Effects of atorvastatin on fasting plasma and marginated apolipoproteins B48 and B100 in large, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in familial combined hyperlipidemia

Large triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) circulate in the blood, but they may also be present in a marginated pool, probably attached to the endothelium. It is unknown whether statins can influence this marginated pool in vivo in humans. Intravenous fat tests were performed in familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) subjects before and after atorvastatin treatment and in controls to investigate whether acute increases in apoB in TRL fractions would occur, potentially reflecting the release of this TRL from a marginated pool. After a 12-h fast, a bolus injection of 10% Intralipid was given to 12 FCHL patients before and after 16-wk treatment with atorvastatin. Twelve carefully matched controls were included. For 60 min postinjection, apoB48, apoB100, and lipids were measured in TRLs. Fasting apoB100 in all TRL fractions were 2- to 3-fold higher in untreated FCHL compared with controls. ApoB48 concentrations in chylomicron fractions increased significantly within 10 min in FCHL before and after treatment, but not in controls. ApoB100 increased significantly in the chylomicron fractions in untreated FCHL and in controls, but not in FCHL after treatment. In very low density lipoprotein 1, apoB100 increased only in untreated FCHL. In very low density lipoprotein 2, apoB100 did not change in any group. These data show that increasing the number of circulating TRLs by chylomicron-like particles, results in increased plasma apoB-TRLs, probably by acute release from a marginated pool. This is a physiological process occurring in FCHL and in healthy normolipidemic subjects, but it is more pronounced in the former. Decreased marginated TRL particles in FCHL is a novel antiatherogenic property of atorvastatin.     

Effect of fenofibrate on serum lipoproteins in subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia

The effects on serum lipoproteins were studied in 8 patients with familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia and 9 patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia during an 8-week treatment with fenofibrate. VLDL, IDL, LDL and HDL were isolated by ultracentrifugation and precipitation. Lipids and apolipoproteins A-I and B were determined by enzymatic and immunonephelometric techniques, respectively. In hypercholesterolemia, administration of fenofibrate resulted in decreases of VLDL, IDL, and LDL (cholesterol -58.3%, -28.6%, and -24.4%), while, in combined hyperlipidemia, treatment with the drug lowered VLDL and IDL (-33.3% and -42.9%). HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I increased only in hypercholesterolemia (+22.9% and +6.9%).     

Effects of atorvastatin on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein subclass, and C-reactive protein in hemodialysis patients

Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with dyslipidemia associated with CRF who were undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Thirty-five patients who were receiving HD were given atorvastatin (10 mg/d) for 3 months. Chylomicron (CM), light and dense very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL), and light and dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were separated by ultracentrifugation. Apolipoprotein (apo) B was measured by electroimmunoassay. Mean LDL particle diameter was measured by gradient gel electrophoresis. Atorvastatin therapy reduced LDL-cholesterol (C) by 36% and remnant-like particle (RLP)-C by 58%. Atorvastatin significantly reduced apo B, apo CIII, and apo E in VLDL by 40% to 46% and IDL-apo B by 66%. Atorvastatin also significantly reduced cholesterol in CM, light VLDL, and dense VLDL without consistently affecting triglyceride (TG) in these lipoproteins. Atorvastatin similarly reduced both light and dense LDL-apo B by 38%. LDL particle size in the HD patients significantly increased during atorvastatin treatment from 25.7 +/- 0.4 to 26.2 +/- 0.6 nm. High sensitive C-reactive protein (HS-CRP) was halved by atorvastatin decreasing from 0.08 +/- 0.05 to 0.04 +/- 0.03 mg/dL. Atorvastatin treatment did not affect the creatinine kinase level, and no classical adverse effects were observed during the study. These results suggest that atorvastatin is safe and effective for the management of dyslipidemia in patients with CFR who are receiving HD, which may help to suppress the development of atherosclerosis.     

Overactive endocannabinoid signaling impairs apolipoprotein E-mediated clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins

The endocannabinoid (EC) system regulates food intake and energy metabolism. Cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) antagonists show promise in the treatment of obesity and its metabolic consequences. Although the reduction in adiposity resulting from therapy with CB1 antagonists may not account fully for the concomitant improvements in dyslipidemia, direct effects of overactive EC signaling on plasma lipoprotein metabolism have not been documented. The present study used a chemical approach to evaluate the direct effects of increased EC signaling in mice by inducing acute elevations of endogenously produced cannabinoids through pharmacological inhibition of their enzymatic hydrolysis by isopropyl dodecylfluorophosphonate (IDFP). Acute IDFP treatment increased plasma levels of triglyceride (TG) (2.0- to 3.1-fold) and cholesterol (1.3- to 1.4-fold) in conjunction with an accumulation in plasma of apolipoprotein (apo)E-depleted TG-rich lipoproteins. These changes did not occur in either CB1-null or apoE-null mice, were prevented by pretreatment with CB1 antagonists, and were not associated with reduced hepatic apoE gene expression. Although IDFP treatment increased hepatic mRNA levels of lipogenic genes (Srebp1 and Fas), there was no effect on TG secretion into plasma. Instead, IDFP treatment impaired clearance of an intravenously administered TG emulsion, despite increased postheparin lipoprotein lipase activity. Therefore, overactive EC signaling elicits an increase in plasma triglyceride levels associated with reduced plasma TG clearance and an accumulation in plasma of apoE-depleted TG-rich lipoproteins. These findings suggest a role of CB1 activation in the pathogenesis of obesity-related hypertriglyceridemia and underscore the potential efficacy of CB1 antagonists in treating metabolic disease.     

阿托伐他汀联合非诺贝特治疗老年混合型高脂血症临床疗效观察

目的 探讨中等剂量阿托伐他汀片剂和非诺贝特胶囊联合应用治疗混合性高脂血症的临床疗效及安全性.方法 混合性高脂血症患者226例,随机分为：阿托伐他汀组112例,阿托伐他汀（20 mg/d）治疗;联合治疗组114例,阿托伐他汀（20 mg/d）和非诺贝特胶囊（200 mg/d）共治疗3个月.观察治疗前、后各项血脂参数的变化、达标率及不良反应.结果 除阿托伐他汀组高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（HDL-C）水平与治疗前相比无明显改善[（0.99±0.27）mmol/L比（0.95±0.24）mmol/L,P＞0.05]外,两组患者各项血脂参数如血清总胆固醇（TC）、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDL-C）和甘油三酯（TG）水平与治疗前相比均有不同程度的改善[阿托伐他汀组：（4.22±0.46）mmol/L比（7.18±0.52）mmol/L,（2.76±0.34）mmol/L比（4.46±0.43）mmol/L,（3.05±0.44）mmol/L比（3.81±0.48）mmol/L;联合治疗组：（3.43±0.42）mmol/L比（7.15±0.50）mmol/L,（2.18±0.31）mmol/L比（4.44±0.42）mmol/L,（1.62±0.31）mmol/L比（3.85±0.51）mmol/L;P均＜0.05],但联合治疗组TG、TC、LDL-C降低的幅度和HDL-C升高幅度较大[（3.05±0.44）mmol/L比（1.62±0.31）mmol/L,（4.22±0.46）mmol/L比（3.43±0.42）mmol/L,（2.76±0.34）mmol/L比（2.18±0.31）mmol/L,（1.23±0.30）mmol/L比（0.99±0.27）mmol/L,P均＜0.05],达标率更高（69.6%比13.4%,83.3%比71.4%,80.7%比67.9%,49.1%比9.8%,P均＜0.05）,明显优于阿托伐他汀组,两组患者不良反应的发生率相比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.结论 中等剂量阿托伐他汀（20 mg/d）和非诺贝特胶囊（200 mg/d）联合应用对混合性高脂血症患者具有良好的安全性和有效性,值得临床推广应用.     

Genetics of familial combined hyperlipidemia

Complex disorders are caused by several environmental factors that interact with multiple genes. These diseases are common at the population level and constitute a major health problem in Western societies. Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) is characterized by elevated levels of serum total cholesterol, triglycerides, or both. This disorder is estimated to be common in Western populations with a prevalence of 1% to 2%. In addition, 14% of patients with premature coronary heart disease (CHD) have FCHL, making this disorder one of the most common genetic dyslipidemias underlying premature CHD. Both genetic and environmental factors are suggested to affect the complex FCHL phenotype, but no specific susceptibility genes to FCHL have been identified. It is hoped that further analysis of the first FCHL locus and other new loci obtained in genome-wide scans will guide us to genes predisposing to this complex disorder.     

Effects of lovastatin therapy on very-low-density lipoprotein triglyceride metabolism in subjects with combined hyperlipidemia: evidence for reduced assembly and secretion of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins.

We have previously reported decreased production rates of the major apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins, very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) in patients with combined hyperlipidemia (CHL) during treatment with lovastatin. In the present study, we determined the effects of lovastatin therapy on VLDL triglyceride (TG) metabolism. Plasma VLDL turnover was determined in six CHL patients, before and during lovastatin therapy. 3H-triglyceride-glycerol-specific activity data derived from injection of 3H-glycerol were analyzed by compartmental modeling. The effects of lovastatin on VLDL TG metabolism were compared with those previously determined on VLDL apoB metabolism in these subjects. Lovastatin therapy was associated with decreased concentrations of VLDL TG in five of six patients and decreased VLDL apoB concentrations in all six. VLDL TG production rates (PR) decreased in five patients, with the mean for the group decreasing from 14.1 +/- 7.1 to 10.3 +/- 4.0 mg/kg/h (P less than .05). VLDL apoB PR also decreased in five patients, with the mean decreasing from 21.8 +/- 20.3 to 12.2 +/- 9.0 mg/kg/d (P = .11). Changes in VLDL TG concentrations during lovastatin treatment were correlated with changes in VLDL apoB concentrations (r = .74, P = .09) and in VLDL TG PR (r = .91, P = .01). Changes in VLDL TG PR were also related to changes in VLDL apoB PR (r = .62, P = NS). There were no consistent changes in the fractional catabolic rates of either VLDL TG or VLDL apoB during lovastatin therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of atorvastatin on postprandial plasma lipoproteins in postinfarction patients with combined hyperlipidaemia

Enhanced and prolonged postprandial lipaemia is implicated in coronary and carotid artery disease. This study assessed the effects of atorvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor, on postprandial plasma concentrations of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs). Sixteen middle-aged men with combined hyperlipidaemia (baseline low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and plasma triglyceride concentrations (median (interquartile range) of 4.54 (4.17-5.26)) and 2.66 (2.04-3.20) mmol/l, respectively) and previous myocardial infarction were randomised to atorvastatin 40 mg or placebo once daily for 8 weeks in a double-blind, cross-over design. The apolipoprotein (apo) B-48 and B-100 contents were determined in subfractions of TRLs as a measure of chylomicron remnant and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particle concentrations (expressed as mg apo B-48 or apo B-100 per litre of plasma), in the fasting state and after intake of a mixed meal. Atorvastatin treatment reduced significantly the fasting plasma concentrations of VLDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and VLDL triglycerides (median% change) by 29, 44 and 27%, respectively, and increased high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 19%, compared with baseline. The postprandial plasma concentrations of large (Svedberg flotation rate (Sf) 60-400) and small (Sf 20-60) VLDLs and chylomicron remnants were almost halved compared with baseline (mean 0-6 h plasma concentrations were reduced by 48% for Sf 60-400 apo B-100, by 46% for Sf 60-400 apo B-48, by 46% for Sf 20-60 apo B-100 and by 27% for Sf 20-60 apo B-48), and the postprandial triglyceridaemia was reduced by 23% during active treatment. In conclusion, atorvastatin 40 mg once daily causes profound reductions of postprandial plasma concentrations of all TRLs in combined hyperlipidaemic patients with premature coronary artery disease.     

Pulse wave velocity in familial combined hyperlipidemia

BACKGROUND: In the present cross-sectional study we investigated whether familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) is associated with an increased arterial wall stiffness, and whether measures of arterial wall stiffness in FCH family members could contribute to cardiovascular risk stratification. METHODS: Ninety-eight subjects with FCH and 230 unaffected relatives filled out a questionnaire about their smoking habits, medical history, and medication use. Fasting venous blood was drawn after discontinuation of any lipid-lowering medication. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx) were determined by applanation tonometry as surrogate markers of arterial stiffness. RESULTS: Patients with FCH had a significantly increased PWV compared to their unaffected relatives (9.07 +/- 2.75 v 8.28 +/- 2.62 m/sec, P = .005), whereas AIx was not increased (21.6 +/- 12.7 v 15.6 +/- 14.1, P = .96). Age- and gender-adjusted PWV was an equally good predictor of the presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in FCH family members as the most predictive combination of age- and gender-adjusted clinical and biochemical risk factors, including total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure (area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) [AUC] 0.83 [0.76-0.90] v AUC 0.84 [0.78-0.91], P = .83). Addition of PWV to the multivariable prognostic model, including these age- and gender-adjusted traditional risk factors, did not increase the predictive ability for CVD (AUC 0.84 [0.79-0.89]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FCH are characterized by an increased arterial stiffness. The PWV predicts the presence of CVD equally well as any combination of clinical and traditional biochemical risk factors, but PWV has no additional value in addition to traditional risk factor screening in FCH families.     

Effects of estrogen and medroxyprogesterone acetate on subpopulations of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoproteins

Hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women has been shown to increase both triglyceride (TG) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. To better understand the effects of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), the 2 most commonly prescribed hormones in HRT, on the different subpopulations of TG-rich and HDL lipoproteins, we conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, crossover study consisting of 3 different phases in 14 postmenopausal women. The 3 phases, each 8-week long, included: (1) placebo, (2) CEE 0.625 mg/d, and (3) CEE 0.625 mg/d and MPA 2.5 mg/d. Slight and statistically nonsignificant elevations in TG levels were observed during the CEE treatment. While very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol levels were not significantly affected by CEE and CEE + MPA, both HRT treatments lowered remnant lipoprotein (RLP) cholesterol (-14% and -37%, respectively). Compared with placebo, CEE caused a significant increase in HDL, HDL(2), apolipoprotein (apo) A-I, LpAI, alpha1, and prealpha1 levels (12%, 27%, 17%, 26%, 60%, and 102%, respectively). The combination therapy blunted the CEE effect on all HDL parameters, resulting in HDL, HDL(2), and LpAI levels being no longer significantly different from placebo. Apo A-I levels and alpha1, and prealpha1 levels were still significantly higher than placebo (+11%, +50%, and +112%, respectively). These results indicate that HRT has beneficial effects on RLP levels and that, while the estrogen component of HRT has a beneficial effect on the HDL subpopulations mostly associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) protection, MPA partially inhibits this effect.     

Elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in diabetes

The role of the intestine in cholesterol metabolism in human diabetes in unclear, although abnormalities have been demonstrated in cholesterol synthesis and absorption in diabetic animals. This study examines the relationship between fasting and post-prandial apolipoprotein B-48 in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Eight type 2 diabetic patients and ten healthy non-diabetic control subjects were given a high-fat meal (1300 kcal), and the triglyceride-rich lipoprotein fraction was isolated by ultracentrifugation (d<1.006 g/ml) from fasting and post-prandial plasma. Apolipoprotein B-48 and apo B-100 were separated on 4%–15% gradient gels and quantified by densitometric scanning with reference to a purified low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apo B-100 preparation. Diabetic patients had significantly higher concentrations of apo B-48 and apo B-100 in both the fasting (P<0.05) and post-prandial (P<0.001) triglyceride-rich lipoprotein samples compared with non-diabetic subjects. The diabetic patients also exhibited a significantly different post-prandial profile for apo B-48 and apo B-100, with a prolonged increase and a later post-prandial peak, than the non-diabetic subjects (P<0.01). These results suggest that the raised fasting triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, often found in diabetes, are associated with apo B-48 and may be derived from increased intestinal chylomicron production. The post-prandial pattern suggests an abnormality in intestinal production as well as hepatic clearance of apo B-48 in type 2 diabetes.     

Effect of statins on LDL particle size in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia: a comparison between atorvastatin and pravastatin

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Elevation of plasma cholesterol and/or triglycerides, and the prevalence of small dense low density lipoproteins (LDL) particles remarkably increase the risk in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL). There are, at present, inconsistent data on the effects of different treatments on size and density of LDL particles in FCHL patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study was designed to evaluate the effect of 3 months' treatment with atorvastatin (10mg/day) or pravastatin (20mg/day) on the lipid/lipoprotein profile and LDL size in a total of 86 FCHL patients. Both statins significantly lowered plasma total and LDL cholesterol, with a significantly higher hypocholesterolemic effect observed with atorvastatin (-26.8+/-11.1% and -35.9+/-11.1%, respectively) compared to pravastatin (-17.6+/-11.1% and -24.5+/-10.2%). The percent decrease in plasma triglycerides was highly variable, but more pronounced with atorvastatin (-19.8+/-29.2%) than with pravastatin (-5.3+/-48.6%). Opposite changes in LDL size were seen with the 2 treatments, with increased mean LDL particle diameter with atorvastatin, and decreased diameter with pravastatin, and significant between treatment difference in terms of percent modification vs baseline (+0.5+/-1.6% with atorvastatin vs -0.3+/-1.8% with pravastatin). CONCLUSIONS: The present results support the evidence indicative of a greater hypocholesterolemic effect of atorvastatin compared to pravastatin, and in addition show a raising effect of atorvastatin on the size of LDL particles in FCHL patients.     

Plasma homocysteine in subjects with familial combined hyperlipidemia

Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) is characterised by hypercholesterolemia and/or hypertriglyceridemia and associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels in subjects with FCH are relatively moderately elevated and do not fully explain the increased risk of CVD. Hyperhomocysteinemia is a disorder of methionine metabolism and also a well-known independent risk factor for CVD. We investigated whether subjects with FCH have higher plasma homocysteine concentrations than controls, and whether homocysteine contributes to the increased risk of CVD in FCH. Furthermore we evaluated whether parameters of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism and/or insulin resistance are associated with the homocysteine level. In total 667 subjects, including 161 subjects with FCH, 109 spouses who referenced as control group and 397 normolipidemic relatives were studied. FCH was defined by the presence of plasma total cholesterol and/or triglyceride levels above the 90th percentile adjusted for age and gender. The mean homocysteine concentration of the FCH group did not significantly differ from the control group. The risk for CVD due to hyperhomocysteinemia in subjects with FCH was not higher than in subjects without FCH. No associations were observed between plasma homocysteine concentration and plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels, including small dense low density lipoprotein, nor between homocysteine concentration and insulin resistance.     

Additive beneficial effects of fenofibrate combined with atorvastatin in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia

OBJECTIVES: We compared vascular and metabolic responses (and adverse responses) to statin and fibrate therapies alone or in combination in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. BACKGROUND: The mechanisms of action for statins and fibrates are distinct. METHODS: Fifty-six patients were given atorvastatin 10 mg and placebo, atorvastatin 10 mg and fenofibrate 200 mg, or fenofibrate 200 mg and placebo daily during each two-month treatment period of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial with two washout periods of two months' each. RESULTS: Lipoproteins were changed to a greater extent with combined therapy when compared with atorvastatin or fenofibrate alone. Flow-mediated dilator response to hyperemia and plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and fibrinogen levels were changed to a greater extent with combined therapy when compared with atorvastatin or fenofibrate alone (p < 0.001, p = 0.182, and p = 0.015 by analysis of variance [ANOVA], respectively). The effects of combined therapy or fenofibrate alone on plasma adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity (determined by the Quantitative Insulin-Sensitivity Check Index [QUICKI]) were significantly greater than those of atorvastatin alone (p = 0.022 for adiponectin and p = 0.049 for QUICKI by ANOVA). No patients were withdrawn from the study as the result of serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy is safe and has beneficial additive effects on endothelial function in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.     

Combination drug therapy for familial combined hyperlipidemia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of gemfibrozil and colestipol with gemfibrozil and lovastatin in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized trial. SETTING: An outpatient clinical research center in a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Seventeen patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia documented by studies of first-degree relatives; nine patients with type 2b hyperlipoproteinemia, and eight patients with type 4 hyperlipoproteinemia. INTERVENTIONS: Baseline lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein levels were obtained during control periods on diet alone and on gemfibrozil therapy. Patients then received gemfibrozil and colestipol or gemfibrozil and lovastatin in a randomized order. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In patients with type 2b hyperlipoproteinemia, gemfibrozil alone significantly reduced total cholesterol by 11%, and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-apolipoprotein B by 18%, did not change LDL-cholesterol, and raised high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels by 26%. Addition of either colestipol or lovastatin reduced LDL-cholesterol levels by 17% and 25%, respectively, compared to gemfibrozil alone. However, colestipol mitigated the HDL-cholesterol raising effect of gemfibrozil and did not further reduce LDL-apolipoprotein B levels. In contrast, addition of lovastatin caused an additional reduction of LDL-apolipoprotein B 19% compared with gemfibrozil alone. In patients with type 4 hyperlipoproteinemia, gemfibrozil alone reduced triglycerides by 40%, raised HDL-cholesterol by 26%, and increased LDL-cholesterol levels by 29%. The addition of either colestipol or lovastatin reduced LDL-cholesterol levels by 34% and 33%, respectively (compared with gemfibrozil alone), but greater reductions of LDL-apolipoprotein B (30% with lovastatin compared with 15% with colestipol, compared with gemfibrozil alone), and increases in HDL-cholesterol levels (8% increase with lovastatin compared with 10% decrease with colestipol, compared to gemfibrozil alone) were seen with the lovastatin combination. CONCLUSIONS: Although gemfibrozil with either colestipol or lovastatin favorably altered lipoprotein levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and familial combined hyperlipidemia, the combination of gemfibrozil and lovastatin appeared superior overall.