Endoscopic,deep mural implantation of Enteryx for the treatment of GERD: 6-month follow-up of a multicenter trial

OBJECTIVES: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the endoscopic implantation of Enteryx, a biocompatible, non-biodegradable liquid polymer for the treatment of GERD. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with heartburn symptoms responsive to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use were enrolled. Inclusion requirements were HRQL score < or = 11 on PPI and > or = 20 off PPI, and 24-hour PH probe with > or = 5% total time at PH < or = 4. Patients with a hiatus hernia > 3 cm, grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, or esophageal motility disorder were excluded. Using a 4-mm needle tipped catheter during standard endoscopy, implants were made in 3-4 quadrants deep into the wall of the cardia. Use of PPI medications, pH-metry, manometry, GERD symptoms, and patient quality of life were assessed over a 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: At 6 months, PPI use was eliminated in 74% and reduced by > 50% in 10% of patients. The median HRQL score improved from 24.0 pre-implant (baseline off PPIs) to 4.0 at 6 months (p < 0.001). Mean total esophageal acid exposure time was 9.5% pretherapy and 6.7% at 6 months (p < 0.001). Mean LES length increased from 2.0 cm at baseline to 3.0 cm posttherapy (p = 0.003). There were no clinically serious adverse events. Transient mild-to-moderate chest pain commonly occurred after implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic implantation of Enteryx is a safe and effective therapy for eliminating or decreasing the need for PPI medications, improving GERD symptoms and patient quality of life, and decreasing esophageal acid exposure among patients suffering from GERD.     

Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of GERD: a multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: A novel endoscopic full-thickness plication device has been designed to inhibit gastroesophageal reflux by placing a transmural plication near the gastroesophageal junction under direct endoscopic visualization. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of endoscopic full-thickness plication in the treatment of patients with symptoms caused by GERD. METHODS: Patients with chronic heartburn requiring maintenance therapy with antisecretory medication were recruited. Exclusion criteria were the following: hiatal hernia (>2 cm), grade III and IV esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus. The following were assessed over a follow-up period of 6 months: GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and SF-36 Health Survey, medication use, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and esophageal manometry. Patients underwent a single, full-thickness plication in the gastric cardia just distal to the gastroesophageal junction. Re-treatment was not permitted. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (mean age 46.3 years, range 23-71 years) underwent endoscopic full-thickness plication (mean procedure time 17.2 minutes). At 6 months after plication, proton pump inhibitor therapy had been eliminated in 74% of previously medication-dependent patients. Median GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life scores improved 67% (19.0 vs. 5.0; p<0.001). Improvements also were observed in median Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and SF-36 Health Survey mental and physical composite scores. Median esophageal acid exposure improved significantly (10 vs. 8; p<0.008) with normalization of pH noted in 30% of patients. No significant change in esophageal manometry was noted. One gastric perforation occurred and was managed conservatively without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a single full-thickness plication placed at the gastroesophageal junction reduced symptoms, medication use, and esophageal acid exposure associated with GERD.     

Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of GERD: 12-month follow-up for the North American open-label trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the intermediate-term (12-month) safety and efficacy of endoscopic full-thickness plication in patients with symptomatic GERD. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with chronic heartburn that required maintenance antisecretory therapy received a single, endoscopically placed, full-thickness plication in the gastric cardia 1 cm distal to the gastroesophageal junction. At baseline and 12 months after plication, patients completed the GERD Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and SF-36 Health Survey, as well as a medication use diary. Ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and esophageal manometry were obtained at baseline and 3 months after plication. At 6 months after plication, the 24-hour pH study was repeated. RESULTS: Of the 57 patients who completed the 12-month follow-up, 40 (70%) were no longer taking a proton pump inhibitor. Median GERD Health Related Quality of Life scores were improved compared with baseline while taking medication (19.0 vs. 5.0; p < 0.0001) and while not taking medication (13.0 vs. 5.0; p < 0.002). At 6 months after the procedure, an improvement in distal esophageal acid exposure was demonstrated in 40 of 51 patients (80%), with a decrease of 39% in the median percentage of time the pH was less than 4 (p < 0.0001). Normal pH scores were observed in 30% of patients. All procedure-related adverse events occurred acutely, as previously reported, and no new adverse event was observed during extended follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Full-thickness plication at the gastroesophageal junction is an effective endoscopic procedure for treatment of patients with symptoms caused by GERD. It reduces reflux symptoms and antisecretory medication use over at least a 1-year period.     

Transoral, flexible endoscopic suturing for treatment of GERD: a multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: A totally transoral outpatient procedure for the treatment of GERD would be appealing. METHODS: A multicenter trial was initiated that included 64 patients with GERD treated with an endoscopic suturing device. Inclusion criteria were 3 or more heartburn episodes per week while not taking medication, dependency on antisecretory medicine, and documented acid reflux by pH monitoring. Exclusion criteria were dysphagia, grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, obesity, and hiatus hernia greater than 2 cm in length. Patients underwent manometry, endoscopy, 24-hour pH monitoring, and symptom severity scoring before and after the procedure. Patients were randomized to a linear or circumferential plication configuration. Adverse procedural events were recorded. RESULTS: Mean 6-month symptom score changes demonstrated procedural efficacy. Heartburn severity and frequency as well as regurgitation all improved (p > 0.0001 for each). Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring showed improvement in number of episodes below pH of 4 at 3 and 6 months (p < 0.0007 and 0.0002) and percentage of total time the pH was less than 4 at 6 months (p < 0.011). Plication configuration did not affect symptoms or pH monitoring results. One patient had a self-contained suture perforation that was successfully treated with antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic gastroplasty is safe. It is associated with reduced symptoms and medication use at 6 month follow-up in patients with uncomplicated GERD.     

Enteryx implantation for GERD: expanded multicenter trial results and interim postapproval follow-up to 24 months

BACKGROUND: Enteryx implantation in the esophagus is an alternative therapy for patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dependent GERD. Although this treatment resulted in highly significant improvement at 6 and 12 months, longer follow-up is needed to more fully assess the durability of these positive effects. METHODS: An open-label, international clinical trial was conducted in 144 PPI-dependent patients with GERD with follow-up at 6 and 12 months. In addition, the durability and the safety of the treatment were assessed for 24 months in 64 patients enrolled in a postapproval study. The primary study outcome measure was usage of PPI. Secondary outcomes in the multicenter trial were GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) symptom score and esophageal acid exposure. RESULTS: At 12 months, PPI use was reduced > or =50% in 84%: 95% confidence interval (CI) [76%, 90%] and was eliminated in 73%: 95% CI[64%, 81%] of evaluable patients (intent-to-treat analysis 78%: 95% CI[70%, 84%] and 68%: 95% CI[60%, 76%], respectively). A GERD-HRQL < or =11 was attained in 78%: 95% CI[69%, 85%] of evaluable patients. Esophageal acid exposure (total time pH <4) was reduced by 31%: 95% CI[17%, 43%]. At 24 months, a > or =50% or greater reduction in PPI use was achieved in 72%: 95% CI[59%, 82%] and PPI use was eliminated in 67%: 95% CI[54%, 78%] of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation provides evidence for sustained effectiveness and safety of implantation of Enteryx in the esophagus in PPI-dependent patients with GERD.     

Rikkunshito improves symptoms in PPI-refractory GERD patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial in Japan

Background

To seek a promising therapeutic regimen for proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the standard PPI treatment, we compared the efficacies of rikkunshito (a Japanese traditional medication) combined with rabeprazole (RPZ) and a double dose of RPZ in a prospective randomized multicenter trial in Japanese PPI-refractory GERD patients.

Methods

One hundred and four patients with GERD symptoms remaining after 4-week treatment with RPZ (10?mg/day) were randomly assigned to 4?weeks of either combination therapy [rikkunshito (7.5?g/day) with a standard dose of RPZ (10?mg/day)] or a double dose of RPZ (20?mg/day). The primary endpoint was the improvement rate, calculated based on the frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) before and after treatment. Subgroup analysis was also performed with respect to each subject??s background factors such as reflux esophagitis (RE)/non-erosive GERD (NERD), age, gender, and body mass index (BMI).

Results

Four-week treatment with rikkunshito combined with RPZ significantly decreased the FSSG score from 17.6?±?6.5 to 12.0?±?6.9, similar to the decrease seen on treatment with a double dose of RPZ. Regarding the therapeutic improvement rate, there were also significant effects in both groups. However, in the subgroup analysis based on RE/NERD, the improvement rate of male NERD patients in the rikkunshito group was significantly greater than that of such patients in the other group (P?P?Conclusion Rikkunshito combined with standard-dose RPZ therapy may be a useful new strategy for PPI-refractory GERD patients.     

Endoluminal gastroplasty (EndoCinch) versus endoscopic polymer implantation (Enteryx) for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6-month results of a prospective, randomized trial

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare and determine the efficiency and safety of two newly introduced endoscopic antireflux procedures in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: In a prospective, randomized trial, endoluminal gastroplasty (EndoCinch) was compared with polymer injection (Enteryx) employing 51 consecutive patients dependent on proton pump inhibitor therapy. Follow-up evaluation included drug consumption, symptoms, quality-of-life scoring, endoscopy, pH monitoring, manometry, and documentation of adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were assigned to EndoCinch treatment, 23 patients received Enteryx implantation, and two patients dropped out before applying endoscopic therapy. At 6 months, proton pump inhibitor therapy could be stopped or dosage was reduced by > or =50% in 20 of 26 (77%) EndoCinch-treated patients and in 20 of 23 patients treated by Enteryx (87%, p= 0.365), which differed significantly in both groups compared to the pre-interventional status (p < 0.0001). Esophageal acid reflux (pH < 4) decreased from 14.5% to 9.6% in EndoCinch-treated patients (p= 0.071) and from 15.5% to 13.9% in patients treated by Enteryx (p= 0.930). Heartburn symptom score, modified DeMeester score, gastrointestinal life quality index, and SF-36 physical health survey score improved significantly in both groups postinterventionally (p < 0.0001). Approximately 25% of the patients in both groups required retreatment in an attempt to achieve symptom control. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective, randomized study directly comparing two endoscopic anti-GERD techniques. EndoCinch and Enteryx seem to be equally successful in the treatment of GERD significantly reducing the proton pump inhibitor dosages, and also by improving symptoms of patients. Both endoluminal antireflux procedures may be promising therapeutic options; long-term evaluation will have to show if the positive initial results can be maintained.     

Optimal treatment duration of glyceryl trinitrate for chronic anal fissure: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial

Background

Chronic anal fissure (CAF) is a painful condition that is unlikely to resolve with conventional conservative management. Previous studies have reported that topical treatment of CAF with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) reduces pain and promotes healing, but optimal treatment duration is unknown.

Methods

To assess the effect of different treatment durations on CAF, we designed a prospective randomized trial comparing 40 versus 80 days with twice daily topical 0.4% GTN treatment (Rectogesic^®, Prostrakan Group). Chronicity was defined by the presence of both morphological (fibrosis, skin tag, exposed sphincter, hypertrophied anal papilla) and time criteria (symptoms present for more than 2 months or pain of less duration but similar episodes in the past). A gravity score (1 = no visible sphincter; 2 = visible sphincter; 3 = visible sphincter and fibrosis) was used at baseline. Fissure healing, the primary endpoint of the study, maximum pain at defecation measured with VAS and maximum anal resting pressure were assessed at baseline and at 14, 28, 40 and 80 days. Data was gathered at the end of the assigned treatment.

Results

Of 188 patients with chronic fissure, 96 were randomized to the 40-day group and 92 to the 80-day group. Patients were well matched for sex, age, VAS and fissure score. There were 34 (19%) patients who did not complete treatment, 18 (10%) because of side effects. Of 154 patients who completed treatment, 90 (58%) had their fissures healed and 105 (68%) were pain free. There was no difference in healing or symptoms between the 40- and the 80-day group. There was no predictor of fissure healing. A low fissure gravity score correlated with increased resolution of pain (P < 0.05) and improvement of VAS score (P < 0.05) on both univariate and multivariate analysis. A lower baseline resting pressure was associated with better pain resolution on univariate analysis (P < 0.01). VAS at defecation and fissure healing significantly improved until 40 days (P < 0.001), while the difference between 40 and 80 days was not significant.

Conclusion

We found no benefits in treating CAF with topical GTN for 80 days compared to 40 days. Fissure healing and VAS improvement continue until 6 weeks of treatment but are unlikely thereafter.     

Endoscopic implantation of Plexiglas (PMMA) microspheres for the treatment of GERD

BACKGROUND: A gelatinous implant containing polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) beads is successfully used to augment the diminished thickness of the chorium in patients with skin defects and wrinkles. The aim of the present study was to determine whether submucosal injection of PMMA microspheres into the lower esophageal folds decreases the severity of symptoms and acid reflux in patients with GERD. METHODS: Endoscopic submucosal implantation of PMMA was carried out in 10 patients with GERD who were either refractory to or dependent on proton pump inhibitors. Symptom severity score, 24-hour pH monitoring, upper GI endoscopy, and EUS were performed to evaluate the efficacy of implantation. RESULTS: A significant decrease in the symptom severity score and mean total time with esophageal pH less than 4 was noted after the implantation of PMMA (p < 0.05). Seven of 10 patients were taking no medication after PMMA implantation. There were no serious procedure-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic implantation of PMMA into the submucosa of the lower esophageal folds may be a new method for treating GERD. Further studies are required to determine the long-term efficacy of the procedure.     

Endoscopic versus operative gastrostomy: final results of a prospective randomized trial

This study compared operative gastrostomy (OG) (by surgeons) with endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) (by physicians) in a prospective randomized fashion to determine whether one technique was superior. PEG (Sachs-Vine) and OG (Stamm) were done using local anesthesia. Patients were assessed for complications, mortality, tube function, and cost. Groups were equally matched for indications and underlying disease. Fifty-seven had OG and 64 had attempted PEG. Complications occurred in 26% of OG patients and 9% died. Complications occurred in 25% of PEG patients and 12% died. Tube feeding was initiated in both groups within a mean of 29 (24 to 72) hours of the gastrostomy placement. OG cost $1675 and PEG $979 to perform. Twenty-one PEG patients required endoscopic tube change which raised their total cost to $1574. We conclude there is no difference between OG (using local anesthesia) and PEG with regard to morbidity, mortality, or tube function. The endoscopic technique does appear to have economic advantage.     

A new pharmacological treatment for intermittent claudication: results of a randomized, multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective medication is limited for the relief of intermittent claudication, a common manifestation of arterial occlusive disease. Cilostazol is a potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation with vasodilation effects. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cilostazol for the treatment of intermittent claudication. METHODS: Thirty-seven outpatient vascular medicine clinics at regional tertiary and university hospitals in the United States participated in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial. Of the 663 screened volunteer patients with leg discomfort, a total of 516 men and women 40 years or older with a diagnosis of moderately severe chronic, stable, symptomatic intermittent claudication were randomized to receive cilostazol, 100 mg, cilostazol, 50 mg, or placebo twice a day orally for 24 weeks. Outcome measures included pain-free and maximal walking distances via treadmill testing, patient-based quality-of-life measures, global assessments by patient and physician, and cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality survival analysis. RESULTS: The clinical and statistical superiority of active treatment over placebo was evident as early as week 4, with continued improvement at all subsequent time points. After 24 weeks, patients who received cilostazol, 100 mg, twice a day had a 51% geometric mean improvement in maximal walking distance (P<.001 vs placebo); those who received cilostazol, 50 mg, twice a day had a 38% geometric mean improvement in maximal walking distance (P<.001 vs placebo). These percentages translate into an arithmetic mean increase in distance walked, from 129.7 m at baseline to 258.8 m at week 24 for the cilostazol, 100 mg, group, and from 131.5 to 198.8 m for the cilostazol, 50 mg, group. Geometric mean change for pain-free walking distance increased by 59% (P<.001) and 48% (P<.001), respectively, in the cilostazol, 100 mg, and cilostazol, 50 mg, groups. These results were corroborated by the results of subjective quality-of-life assessments, functional status, and global evaluations. Headache, abnormal stool samples or diarrhea, dizziness, and palpitations were the most commonly reported potentially drug-related adverse events and were self-limited. A total of 75 patients (14.5%) withdrew because of any adverse event, which was equally distributed between all 3 treatment groups. Similarly, there were no differences between groups in the incidence of combined cardiovascular morbidity or all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, long-term use of cilostazol, 100 mg or 50 mg, twice a day significantly improves walking distances in patients with intermittent claudication.     

尼麦角林治疗血管性认知功能障碍的前瞻性、多中心临床研究

目的　验证尼麦角林 (乐喜林 )治疗血管性认知功能障碍的有效性和安全性。　方法　前瞻性、分层随机、阳性药物 (脑通 )对照的多中心临床试验。选择 15 0例认知功能障碍的患者 ,主要评价指标为精神认知能力 (CCSE)和社会活动功能 (FAQ)以及CCI指数 (CCSE +FAQ) ,次要评价指标为血液流变学指标和疗效指数。　结果　CCSE评分由治疗前的 (16 85± 5 2 3)分提高到治疗后的(2 0 6 1± 5 2 6 )分 ,FAQ评分由治疗前的 (14 77± 5 93)分提高到治疗后的 (18 74± 6 12 )分 ,差异均有显著性 (P <0 0 1) ,CCI指数由治疗前 31 6 2± 10 96提高到治疗后 39 35± 11 13(P <0 0 1) ;全血低切黏度由 7 0 7± 2 6 5下降到 6 0 8± 3 2 2、红细胞压积由 (4 3 4 7± 4 30 )下降到 (4 0 82± 3 93) %、血浆比黏度由 1 91± 0 38下降到 1 78± 0 30 ,差异均有显著性 (P <0 0 1) ;通过阳性药物 (脑通 )对照 ,结果表明国产尼麦角林和进口尼麦角林对血液流变学和认知功能方面具有相同的功效 ,对认知功能障碍的总有效率分别为 76 %和 70 %。　结论　乐喜林是治疗血管性认知功能障碍的高效、安全的药物 ,与进口尼麦角林具有相同的品质。     

Safety and efficacy of IV treprostinil for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a prospective, multicenter, open-label, 12-week trial

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life-threatening disease for which both continuous IV epoprostenol and continuous subcutaneous treprostinil have proven effective. With continuous IV treprostinil having potential advantages over both of the above therapies, we investigated the safety and efficacy of this regimen in patients with PAH. METHODS: We conducted a 12-week, prospective, open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter study of continuous IV treprostinil in 16 patients with PAH that was idiopathic (n = 8), related to connective tissue disease (n = 6), or related to congenital heart disease (n = 2). The primary end point was change from baseline to week 12 in exercise capacity assessed by the 6-min walk (6MW) test. RESULTS: Continuous IV treprostinil increased 6MW distance (mean +/- SE) by 82 m from baseline (319 +/- 22 m) to week 12 (400 +/- 26 m) [n = 14; p = 0.001]. There were also significant improvements in the secondary end points of Naughton-Balke treadmill time (p = 0.007), Borg dyspnea score (p = 0.008), and hemodynamics (mean pulmonary artery pressure, p = 0.03; cardiac index, p = 0.002; pulmonary vascular resistance, p = 0.001) at week 12 compared with baseline. Side effects were mild and consistent with those reported with prostacyclin treatment. One death, unrelated to study drug, occurred during the 12-week study in a patient who received 3 days of treprostinil and died 2 weeks later. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term IV infusion of treprostinil is safe and appears to be effective for the treatment of patients with PAH.     

Effect of a collective educational program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective 12-month randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on health and functional status of an 8-week group-education program for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in addition to usual medical care. METHODS: All consecutive inpatients and outpatients with RA (ACR criteria) were asked to participate in this randomized, prospective, controlled trial. The educational intervention consisted of 8 weekly ambulatory sessions, each lasting 6 hours. Followup was undertaken after 1 year. The primary criterion for judging effectiveness was the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score; secondary criteria consisted of coping, medical knowledge, patient global satisfaction, and quality of life scores before the intervention and after 1 year. RESULTS: We asked 1242 inpatients and outpatients to participate in the study: 208 (16.75%) agreed (104 in each group). At baseline, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. After 1 year, no statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in change in HAQ score: -0.04 +/- 0.46 (education group) vs -0.06 +/- 0.47 (control group) (p = 0.79). Statistically significant differences were found in 3 domains: patient coping (-1.22 +/- 5.55 vs -0.22 +/- 3.81; p = 0.03), knowledge (3.42 +/- 4.73 vs 0.73 +/- 3.78; p < 0.0001), and satisfaction (10.07 +/- 11.70 vs 5.72 +/- 13.77; p = 0.02), all of which were better for the group attending the education sessions. CONCLUSION: Despite improvements in patient coping, knowledge, and satisfaction, the education program was not found to be effective at 1 year. There may have been methodological problems relating to the sensitivity of questionnaires and patient selection, and tailored educational interventions should be considered.