玻璃体切割治疗玻璃体积血的临床疗效观察

目的:探讨玻璃体切割治疗玻璃体积血的临床疗效。方法:对72例75眼玻璃体积血患者采用玻璃体切割手术治疗,术中根据具体病情联合单纯白内障摘除或白内障摘除联合人工晶状体植入术、眼内异物取出、膜剥离、水下透热、眼内光凝或/和巩膜外冷凝及眼内注气或硅油充填。结果:选取75眼中外伤性玻璃体积血(穿孔性眼外伤19眼,眼球钝挫伤8眼)27眼,视网膜静脉阻塞15眼,增殖期糖尿病视网膜病变12眼,Eales病9眼,视网膜裂孔合并玻璃体积血9眼,年龄相关性黄斑病变3眼。术后随访6～48(平均18±5.6)mo,75眼中72眼视力有不同程度的提高,>0.05者65眼(87%),>0.2者54眼(72%),>0.5者23眼(31%),术后视力没有提高3眼(4%),术后视力与术前相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:严重的眼外伤合并玻璃体积血、大量玻璃体积血药物治疗不吸收,反复发生的玻璃体积血和B超检查发现视网膜脱离者应及时行玻璃体切割术以改善和保护视功能。     

严重眼外伤的玻璃体视网膜手术方法探讨

目的 探讨玻璃体视网膜手术治疗严重眼外伤的效果.方法 玻璃体切除联合白内障人工晶状体植入术、服内异物摘出术、视网膜脱离复位术等治疗严重眼外伤34例(34眼).结果 术后视力较术前提高者26眼(76.47%),术后视力不变者6眼(17.64%),术后视力下降者2眼(5.89%);眼内异物14眼(41.17%)均一次成功摘出,视网膜脱离者13眼(38.23%),手术后成功复位11眼(84.62%).结论 严格选择手术适应证及手术时机,掌握熟练的手术操作技巧,则玻璃体视网膜手术可以挽救大多数严重外伤眼,并能获得一定的视功能.     

玻璃体切割联合手术治疗严重眼外伤的临床观察

目的：探讨玻璃体切割联合手术治疗严重眼外伤的临床疗效。方法：回顾性分析我院自2011-01以来收治的经玻璃体切割联合手术治疗的严重眼外伤患者30例31眼。结果：患者31眼中术后视力提高24眼,术前无光感12眼中术后视力不变2眼,光感2眼,手动3眼,指数4眼,1眼恢复为0.1;6眼球内异物的异物取出率为100%,炎症控制好;18眼复杂视网膜脱离,15眼成功复位,视网膜复位率为83%;14眼外伤性白内障或晶状体脱位,玻璃体手术后12眼行人工晶状体植入术,晶状体植入率为86%。结论：严重眼外伤包括术前无光感眼,经过恰当的玻璃体手术联合相应的治疗措施,可以最大限度保留患者的眼球及挽救患者的视功能。     

玻璃体切除联合硅油填充手术治疗急性感染性眼内炎

目的：研究玻璃体切除联合硅油填充手术治疗急性感染性眼内炎的临床效果。

方法：回顾性分析2008-01/2013-02我院收治的急性感染性眼内炎患者23例23眼临床资料,排除伴有球内异物的病例。所有患者均采用常规闭合三通道玻璃体切除联合硅油填充手术,其中6眼(并发外伤性白内障)联合Ⅰ期晶状体摘除+Ⅰ期人工晶状体植入术,3眼(并发外伤性白内障)联合Ⅰ期晶状体切除+Ⅱ期人工晶状体植入术, 4眼(硅油填充期间并发白内障)联合Ⅱ期晶状体摘除+Ⅱ期人工晶状体植入术,5眼(4眼外伤性眼内炎及1眼青光眼滤过泡漏致眼内炎)保留晶状体,1眼(白内障术后眼内炎)联合Ⅰ期人工晶状体取出+Ⅱ期人工晶状体植入,4眼(白内障术后眼内炎)保留人工晶状体。

结果：随访6～24mo,行玻璃体切除联合硅油填充手术的患者23例23眼眼内炎均得到有效控制,21眼(91%)患者视力不同程度提高。有2眼玻璃体切除术后眼压≥30mmHg,1眼行硅油取出术后眼压恢复正常,另1眼取硅油术后眼压仍高,需应用降眼压药物控制。

结论：急性感染性眼内炎患者及时行玻璃体切除联合硅油填充手术治疗,能有效控制眼内炎,提高患者视力。     

状体超声乳化玻璃体切割及后房型人工晶状体植入术

目的　评价晶状体超声乳化玻璃体切割及后房型人工晶状体植入术的临床疗效。方法　对16例患者行晶状体超声乳化玻璃体切割及后房型人工晶状体植入术。结果　3～10个月随访中,所有患者术后视力都有不同程度提高,视力05以上者6例(375%),02～04者7例(4375%),01以下者3例(1875%)。结论　玻璃体切割术中行晶状体超声乳化术联合后房型人工晶状体植入术,能够获得良好视力而无严重并发症,是治疗白内障合并眼后段病变一种较理想的手术。     

复杂眼外伤的玻璃体切除联合手术治疗

目的:探讨玻璃体切除联合手术治疗复杂眼外伤的疗效。方法:玻璃体切除联合白内障摘除、人工晶状体Ⅱ期植入、眼内异物摘出、视网膜脱离复位治疗复杂眼外伤26例26眼。结果:术后视力较术前提高者19眼,视力不变者6眼,视力下降者1眼;眼内炎2眼感染控制,眼内异物9眼均一次成功摘出,视网膜脱离成功复位者5眼,眼球萎缩1眼。结论:选择恰当的手术时机,合理的手术方案,对挽救眼球和恢复视功能起着决定性作用。     

玻璃体切除术治疗复杂眼外伤的临床研究

目的 探讨玻璃体切除术在复杂眼外伤中的治疗效果和应用价值.方法 对36例(36只眼)复杂眼外伤的玻璃体手术进行回顾性分析.结果 36只眼中术后视力提高者32只眼,其中2只眼最佳矫正视力分别为0.4和0.8,0.12～0.3者26只眼,0.05～0.1者4只眼,视力不变者4只眼.9只眼眼内异物(合并化脓性眼内炎4只眼),异物取出率100%,眼内炎控制好;玻璃体积血16只眼,视网膜平伏,无再次出血;复杂视网膜脱离1只眼,视网膜复位;晶状体脱位合并继发性青光眼10只眼,眼压均控制正常,其中3只眼行Ⅰ期人工晶状体植入,7只眼行Ⅱ期人工晶状体植入.结论 玻璃体切除手术是目前最理想的治疗复杂眼外伤的有效方法,能挽救受伤眼并恢复一定的有用视力.     

严重眼外伤的玻璃体手术治疗

目的探讨玻璃体手术治疗严重眼外伤的效果。方法严重眼外伤35例(35眼),行玻璃体切除术和眼内异物摘出术,联合角巩膜缝合、晶状体切除、眼内激光光凝、巩膜外冷凝以及C3F8或硅油填充术,并根据年龄、眼部外伤情况及术前炎症反应,行人工晶状体Ⅰ期植入或Ⅱ期植入术。随访3～6月。结果术中16例眼内异物均成功摘出,视网膜脱离22眼,其中19眼复位。术后视力提高22眼,视力不变10眼,视力下降3眼。结论玻璃体切除术能有效治疗严重眼外伤,能最大限度挽救患者的视力和眼球。     

玻璃体切割联合超声乳化及人工晶状体悬吊术治疗晶状体脱位

目的探讨玻璃体切割联合超声乳化及人工晶状体悬吊术治疗晶状体脱位的临床疗效。方法选取晶状体脱入玻璃体内的患者30例(30眼),其中眼球钝挫伤引起的晶状体全脱位25眼,针拨白内障术后晶状体全脱位2眼,白内障摘出术中晶状体核脱入玻璃体内3眼。根据脱入玻璃体内的晶状体核硬度不同采用不同的手术方法,行玻璃体切割联合晶状体切除及人工晶状体悬吊植入术,必要时行硅油填充。术后随访0.5～1a,观察视力、眼压及并发症等情况。结果本组患者行玻璃体切割联合晶状体切除及人工晶状体悬吊植入术19例(19眼);玻璃体切割联合超声乳化及人工晶状体悬吊植入术10例(10眼);玻璃体切割联合超声乳化及硅油充填术1例(1眼)。术后视力:0.1～0.3者16眼,0.3～0.5者9眼,0.5以上者5眼;术后继发青光眼3眼,经降眼压治疗后恢复正常范围。术后随访期间未发现视网膜脱离、玻璃体积血、人工晶状体偏位等并发症。结论玻璃体切割联合超声乳化及人工晶状体悬吊植入术治疗晶状体脱位是一种安全、有效的方法。     

玻璃体切除联合手术治疗严重眼外伤82例

目的：观察玻璃体切除联合手术治疗严重眼外伤的临床效果。方法：采用标准三切口玻璃体切除联合白内障人工晶状体植入，眼内异物摘出，视网膜脱离复位术等治疗严重眼外伤82例，结果：术后视力提高60例，占73．2％，盲率由治疗前84．1％降至31．7％,其中27例视力提高到0．3以上，29例视力在0．05－0．3，35例眼内异物均一次手术摘出，视网膜脱离复位率达81．3％。结论：玻璃体切除联合手术治疗严重眼外伤术后视力恢复较好，并发症少。     

玻璃体切除手术治疗复杂眼外伤

目的:探讨玻璃体切除术在治疗复杂眼外伤中的应用价值。方法:对75例77眼复杂眼外伤的玻璃体切除手术进行临床分析。结果:眼内非磁性异物18眼,摘出率100%。玻璃体积血26眼,复杂视网膜脱离23眼,复位率85%,化脓性眼内炎5眼,炎症均控制。继发性青光眼5眼,眼压均控制在正常范围内。77眼中术后视力提高者63眼(85%),视力不变或下降者14眼(15%)。结论:玻璃体切除手术是目前最理想的治疗复杂眼外伤的方法。     

眼外伤晶状体玻璃体切除术后二期IOL植入术

目的 探讨复杂性眼外伤玻璃体切除术后无晶状体眼二期人工晶状体植入术临床疗效，评估手术的可行性及安全性。方法 手术31例(31眼)，术后随访3～20月，观察视力、散光度、眼压及并发症：结果 30眼术后裸眼视力均达到或接近术前矫正视力：后房型人工晶状体睫状沟植入7眼中视力≥0．5者占28．57％，后房型人工晶状体透巩膜睫状沟缝线固定术18眼中视力≥0.5者占22．22％，虹膜型人工晶状体植入术6眼中视力≥0．5者占33．33％：1眼视力下降。结论 复杂性眼外伤行玻璃体切除术后二期人工晶状体植入，经过术前病例的选择，术中采用眼内灌注，适宜的人工晶状体植入，可获得较好的视力。     

Long-term results after epilenticular intraocular lens implantation following traumatic cataract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the late postoperative outcome and complication rate after lensectomy with primary epilenticular intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for traumatic cataract. Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 11 patients who were operated on for traumatic cataract after penetrating or blunt ocular trauma between 1997 and 2002. One patient developed cataract due to a large rupture of the posterior capsule after blunt trauma. Ten patients sustained a penetrating ocular injury with (7 eyes) or without (3 eyes) intraocular foreign body (IOFB). In all patients the IOL was implanted at the beginning of the operation into the ciliary sulcus in front of the opaque lens followed by pars-plana lensectomy and vitrectomy. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 27.4 months. Eight eyes (72.7 %) achieved a final visual acuity of 0.5 or better. Major causes of limited visual acuity were central corneal scars causing irregular astigmatism. In all patients the IOL was safely and easily implanted into the ciliary sulcus. During the subsequent pars-plana lensectomy and vitrectomy as well as during the follow-up period all IOLs remained anatomically stable and well centered. In one patient PVR retinal detachment had to be treated by pars-plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade. CONCLUSIONS: Epilenticular IOL implantation followed by pars-plana lensectomy is an easy and safe method to treat traumatic cataract in the setting of penetrating ocular trauma repair. It is associated with a favorable visual outcome and a low rate of postoperative complications.     

外伤性白内障的手术治疗探讨(英文)

目的:探讨联合手术治疗外伤性白内障的疗效。方法:角巩膜裂伤清创缝合、白内障摘除、人工晶状体植入、玻璃体切除联合手术治疗外伤性白内障73例(73眼)。结果:患者73例中,眼球钝挫伤27例,穿通伤46例,术后3mo矫正视力<0.05者5例(7%),0.05～0.3者17例(23%),>0.3者49例(67%),手术脱盲率为93%,2例(3%)眼球萎缩,平均随访时间7.8(3～15)mo。结论:掌握好联合手术的适应证,合理设计手术方式,巧妙地处理并发症,可以最大限度恢复患者的最佳视力。     

Secondary intraocular lens implantation of traumatic cataract in open-globe injury

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the visual outcome and accuracy of biometry in traumatic cataract in open-globe injury. METHODS: A clinical retrospective study of 30 consecutive patients treated for ocular penetrating trauma was conducted. Patient demographics, causes of injury, wound categories, timing and procedures of the primary repair, interval of subsequent intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, follow-up, and postoperative complications were recorded. Additionally, binocular biometry was documented. Twenty-six eyes (86.7%) were open-globe injuries occurring in the workplace. All patients received cataract extraction with primary repair of the penetrating wound, 18 eyes (60%) underwent trans pars plana vitrectomy with lensectomy and 12 eyes (40%) underwent lens aspiration or extracapsular cataract extraction. Simultaneously, 16 eyes (53.3%) underwent intraocular foreign body removal. RESULTS: The mean visual improvement after secondary IOL implantation was statistically significant (p = 0.002). Seventeen eyes (56.7%) achieved final best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. The mean deviation of final refraction and target refraction was -0.69 +/- 0.56 diopter, and 23 eyes (76.7%) were within 1 diopter based on biometry of the traumatic eye. In 18 eyes (60%), the difference was within 1 diopter according to biometry of the fellow eye. In 5 cases (16.7%), there was no improvement of vision because of central corneal scar, secondary glaucoma, macular pucker, or recurrent retinal detachment. INTERPRETATION: The vision of patients with traumatic cataract in open-globe injury was improved after prompt surgical intervention and subsequent IOL implantation. A minority of patients experienced no change in vision or a deterioration of vision due to irregular astigmatism caused by a corneal wound or variable damage to the posterior segment. Using biometry of the injured eye after primary repair was more accurate than using biometry of the fellow eye to determine the power of the lens for IOL implantation in variable open-globe injury.     

玻璃体手术联合人工晶体植入治疗经选择的复杂眼外伤103例

目的：观察累及眼球前后节的复杂外伤患者施行玻璃体手术联合人工晶体植入的视力效果。方法：对１０３例（１０４只眼）复杂眼外伤经一次玻璃体手术联合人工晶体植入的病例进行回顾性研究。结果：本组眼内异物３５例,眼球穿通伤３７例,无眼内异物的爆炸伤９例（１０只眼）,眼球钝挫伤２２例。除３例儿童视力不能检查外,在１００例１０１只眼中,手术前视力为无光感～指数的８８只眼（８７．１％）;手术后９４只眼（９３．１％）     

玻璃体手术后无晶状体眼的二期人工晶状体植入术

目的评价因复杂眼外伤或视网膜脱离行玻璃体手术和晶状体切除术后,二期手术植入人工晶状体(intraocular lens,IOL)的视力效果、手术技术及其安全性 。方法对在1996年11月至1999年12月之间在我院进行该手术的32例(32只眼,每例均为单眼)行回顾性分析。二期手术中应用经睫状体平部的眼内灌注,并根据晶状体囊膜完整性选择不同类型的IOL。结果本组包括复杂眼外伤30例(眼后节异物伤15例,穿通伤伴外伤性眼内炎及玻璃体积血各6例,钝挫伤伴晶状体脱位3例);原发性视网膜脱离2例。均接受过玻璃体切割、晶状体切割,或眼内异物取出、角膜缝合等。2次手术的间隔为1～16个月,平均(6.8±3.7)个月。在25例晶状体囊环完整或存留2/3以上的眼植入后房型IOL于睫状沟内;5例作了IOL的透巩膜缝线固定术;植入前房型或带虹膜IOL各1例。5例同期放出硅油。手术后29例视力提高。主要并发症为角膜水肿及低眼压。结论在玻璃体手术后的二期手术中,应用眼内灌注和适当的IOL植入,可使经选择的无晶状体眼安全获得较好的视力恢复。(中华眼底病杂志,2001,17:96-98)     

Combined phacoemulsification, vitrectomy, foreign-body extraction, and intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of simultaneous phacoemulsification, pars plana vitrectomy, intraocular foreign-body extraction, and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: SSK Ankara Eye Hospital, Department of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: Seventeen patients with corneal perforation, intraocular foreign body, vitreous hemorrhage, and lens opacity had simultaneous clear corneal phacoemulsification, pars plana vitrectomy, intraocular foreign-body extraction, and IOL implantation. RESULTS: Postoperative complications included massive retinal fibrosis in 2 patients, retinal detachment in 1, and cilioretinal artery occlusion in 1. At a mean follow-up of 15.2 months, best corrected visual acuity improved in the remaining 13 eyes (76%). The IOL was stable in all cases. CONCLUSION: Combined phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and vitreoretinal surgery was safe in selected cases of penetrating ocular trauma resulting from an intraocular foreign body.