Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter?

Valid and reliable self-report measures of cancer screening behaviors are important for evaluating efforts to improve adherence to guidelines. We evaluated test-retest reliability and validity of self-report of the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy (SIG), colonoscopy (COL), and barium enema (BE) using the National Cancer Institute colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) questionnaire. A secondary objective was to evaluate reliability and validity by mail, telephone, and face-to-face survey administration modes. Consenting men and women, 51 to 74 years old, receiving care at a multispecialty clinic for at least 5 years who had not been diagnosed with colorectal cancer were stratified by prior CRCS status and randomized to survey mode (n = 857). Within survey mode, respondents were randomized to complete a second survey at 2 weeks, 3 months, or 6 months. Comparing self-report with administrative and medical records, concordance estimates were 0.91 for COL, 0.85 for FOBT, 0.85 for SIG, and 0.92 for BE. Overall sensitivity estimates were 0.91 for COL, 0.82 for FOBT, 0.76 for SIG, and 0.56 for BE. Specificity estimates were 0.91 for COL, 0.86 for FOBT, 0.89 for SIG, and 0.97 for BE. Sensitivity and specificity varied little by survey mode for any test. Report-to-records ratio showed overreporting for SIG (1.1), COL (1.15), and FOBT (1.57), and underreporting for BE (0.82). Reliability at all time intervals was highest for COL; there was no consistent pattern according to survey mode. This study provides evidence to support the use of the National Cancer Institute CRCS questionnaire to assess self-report with any of the three survey modes.     

Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening in a large medical organization.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among eligible patients in a large medical practice. A secondary objective was to compare CRC screening rates obtained from medical records with physician self-reported CRC screening recommendation. We conducted a retrospective record review of 214 patients ages > or = 50 years of a large multispecialty medical organization in Houston, Texas, for receipt of fecal occult blood test (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (SIG), and/or colonoscopy (COL). We estimated prevalence using two definitions: (a) FOBT in past year or SIG in past 5 years or COL in past 10 years; and (b) FOBT in past year and SIG in past 5 years or COL in past 10 years. Age, gender, race/ethnicity, family history, number of chronic conditions, and index visit were independent variables. Contingency table and logistic regression analysis were used to test for associations between outcomes and independent variables. Our study population was 48% male with a mean age of 63 years (range: 53-84 years). One-quarter of the records showed FOBT by 3-day kit (51 of 214) and 27% by digital rectal exam (57 of 214). SIG was recorded in 32% of records. Half (54%) of the records had documentation of CRC screening according to definition no. 1 and 19% according to definition no. 2. Screening rates from medical record review were lower than those derived from physician self-report. Our findings underscore the need for interventions to improve CRC screening in primary care settings.     

Trends in colorectal cancer screening with home-based fecal occult blood tests in adults ages 50 to 64 years, 2000-2008

BACKGROUND:

National surveys have reported declines in rates of home‐based fecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in the last decade. However, socioeconomic status (SES) and racial/ethnic differences in FOBT trends and their changes relative to endoscopic CRC screening have not been evaluated.

METHODS:

Data on adults ages 50 to 64 years from the 2000, 2005, and 2008 National Health Interview Surveys were used. Weighted analyses and multivariate logistic regression were used to study trends in the use of FOBT and endoscopic CRC screening during this period.

RESULTS:

Between 2000 and 2008, significant declines in FOBT prevalence occurred in higher SES groups, but not in lower SES groups (uninsured and publicly insured, those without a usual source of care, lower educated, lower income, and immigrants to the United States) or Hispanics. Endoscopic CRC screening during the period studied consistently increased in all higher SES subgroups. In contrast, few lower SES subgroups (publicly insured, lower educated, near poor individuals, long‐term immigrants) and Hispanics experienced increases in CRC endoscopic screening, and these increases were smaller than those observed in higher SES subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Socially and economically disadvantaged groups experienced little or no change in FOBT prevalence, and few of these groups experienced contemporaneous increases in CRC endoscopic screening. These trends suggest the continued availability and acceptance of FOBT in these groups. If national CRC screening goals are to be achieved in populations with lower access to colonoscopy, then annual high‐sensitivity FOBT should be promoted as an immediately accessible and viable alternative. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment

Background:

Guidelines underline the role of individual preferences in the selection of a screening test, as insufficient evidence is available to recommend one screening test over another. We conducted a study to determine the preferences of individuals and to predict uptake for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes using various screening tests.

Methods:

A discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire was distributed among naive subjects, yet to be screened, and previously screened subjects, aged 50–75 years. Subjects were asked to choose between scenarios on the basis of faecal occult blood test (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), total colonoscopy (TC) with various test-specific screening intervals and mortality reductions, and no screening (opt-out).

Results:

In total, 489 out of 1498 (33%) screening-naïve subjects (52% male; mean age±s.d. 61±7 years) and 545 out of 769 (71%) previously screened subjects (52% male; mean age±s.d. 61±6 years) returned the questionnaire. The type of screening test, screening interval, and risk reduction of CRC-related mortality influenced subjects'' preferences (all P<0.05). Screening-naive and previously screened subjects equally preferred 5-yearly FS and 10-yearly TC (P=0.24; P=0.11), but favoured both strategies to annual FOBT screening (all P-values <0.001) if, based on the literature, realistic risk reduction of CRC-related mortality was applied. Screening-naive and previously screened subjects were willing to undergo a 10-yearly TC instead of a 5-yearly FS to obtain an additional risk reduction of CRC-related mortality of 45% (P<0.001).

Conclusion:

These data provide insight into the extent by which interval and risk reduction of CRC-related mortality affect preferences for CRC screening tests. Assuming realistic test characteristics, subjects in the target population preferred endoscopic screening over FOBT screening, partly, due to the more favourable risk reduction of CRC-related mortality by endoscopy screening. Increasing the knowledge of potential screenees regarding risk reduction by different screening strategies is, therefore, warranted to prevent unrealistic expectations and to optimise informed choice.     

Primary care patients' understanding of colorectal cancer screening

PURPOSE: To determine the current level of awareness and understanding about colorectal cancer (CRC) and colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) among primary care patients in order to develop interventions to educate patients about options for CRCS, help them identify CRCS preferences and make informed choices about CRCS options. METHODS: During the spring of 2001 and 2003, two sets of focus groups with primary care patients were conducted at a large multi-specialty group practice in Houston, Texas. RESULTS: Participants (n = 42) in both sets of focus groups had low knowledge about CRC and expressed fear and embarrassment about CRC and CRCS. Attitudes towards the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) were mixed, with some participants considering it difficult to finish and others preferring the privacy it afforded. Some participants initially failed to recognize the difference between sigmoidoscopy (SIG) and colonoscopy (COL), and several endoscopy-specific barriers were identified such as fear of pain, embarrassment/humiliation, and dislike or fear of test preparation. Some participants felt that endoscopy was likely to be more effective than FOBT, and others clearly preferred COL to SIG. System-specific barriers to endoscopy (e.g. difficulty scheduling appointments and insurance coverage) were also identified. We found little change in the barriers reported by primary care patients, despite a two-year difference between focus groups. Participants also provided suggestions for improving CRCS including telephone, letters and/or email reminders from the clinic, videotapes and websites. CONCLUSIONS: Future interventions focused on improving informed decision-making by educating primary care patients about the risks and benefits of specific test options and about the importance of early detection of CRC could prove to be effective for increasing CRCS.     

A novel hypothesis on the sensitivity of the fecal occult blood test

BACKGROUND:

Estimates of the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) (Hemoccult II) sensitivity differed widely between screening trials and led to divergent conclusions on the effects of FOBT screening. We used microsimulation modeling to estimate a preclinical colorectal cancer (CRC) duration and sensitivity for unrehydrated FOBT from the data of 3 randomized controlled trials of Minnesota, Nottingham, and Funen. In addition to 2 usual hypotheses on the sensitivity of FOBT, we tested a novel hypothesis where sensitivity is linked to the stage of clinical diagnosis in the situation without screening.

METHODS:

We used the MISCAN‐Colon microsimulation model to estimate sensitivity and duration, accounting for differences between the trials in demography, background incidence, and trial design. We tested 3 hypotheses for FOBT sensitivity: sensitivity is the same for all preclinical CRC stages, sensitivity increases with each stage, and sensitivity is higher for the stage in which the cancer would have been diagnosed in the absence of screening than for earlier stages. Goodness‐of‐fit was evaluated by comparing expected and observed rates of screen‐detected and interval CRC.

RESULTS:

The hypothesis with a higher sensitivity in the stage of clinical diagnosis gave the best fit. Under this hypothesis, sensitivity of FOBT was 51% in the stage of clinical diagnosis and 19% in earlier stages. The average duration of preclinical CRC was estimated at 6.7 years.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our analysis corroborated a long duration of preclinical CRC, with FOBT most sensitive in the stage of clinical diagnosis. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Colorectal cancer screening comparing no screening,immunochemical and guaiac fecal occult blood tests: A cost‐effectiveness analysis

Comparability of cost‐effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening strategies is limited if heterogeneous study data are combined. We analyzed prospective empirical data from a randomized‐controlled trial to compare cost‐effectiveness of screening with either one round of immunochemical fecal occult blood testing (I‐FOBT; OC‐Sensor®), one round of guaiac FOBT (G‐FOBT; Hemoccult‐II®) or no screening in Dutch aged 50 to 75 years, completed with cancer registry and literature data, from a third‐party payer perspective in a Markov model with first‐ and second‐order Monte Carlo simulation. Costs were measured in Euros (€), effects in life‐years gained, and both were discounted with 3%. Uncertainty surrounding important parameters was analyzed. I‐FOBT dominated the alternatives: after one round of I‐FOBT screening, a hypothetical person would on average gain 0.003 life‐years and save the health care system €27 compared with G‐FOBT and 0.003 life years and €72 compared with no screening. Overall, in 4,460,265 Dutch aged 50–75 years, after one round I‐FOBT screening, 13,400 life‐years and €320 million would have been saved compared with no screening. I‐FOBT also dominated in sensitivity analyses, varying uncertainty surrounding important effect and cost parameters. CRC screening with I‐FOBT dominated G‐FOBT and no screening with or without accounting for uncertainty.     

Adding familial risk assessment to faecal occult blood test can increase the effectiveness of population-based colorectal cancer screening

Background

The Dutch Health Council recently recommended the introduction of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme by faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) for individuals aged 55-75 at population risk of CRC. Individuals at an increased familial CRC risk (?2 times population risk) should be identified at a younger age, so they and their relatives can receive earlier, more intensive surveillance instead of FOBT.

Aims

To determine the percentage of participants with a positive FOBT in a CRC screening programme with an increased familial CRC risk.

Methods

In a population-based study, 10,569 individuals aged 50-75 received an FOBT. Individuals with a positive FOBT were invited for colonoscopy and familial risk assessment. Participants with an average familial CRC risk were compared to those with an increased risk. Increased familial CRC risk was defined as a cumulative lifetime risk of CRC of at least 10%.

Results

Of 6001 participants, 430 had a positive FOBT, of whom 324 (63% males; mean age 63 years) completed colonoscopy and familial risk assessment. CRC (n = 22) and/or advanced adenomas (n = 122) were found in 133 participants. Familial CRC risk was increased in 6% of participants with a positive FOBT. No significant differences were found between participants with an average versus an increased familial CRC risk.

Conclusion

Six percent of participants with a positive FOBT had an increased familial CRC risk. Identifying at-risk participants enables them and their relatives to undergo regular colonoscopies. Adding familial risk assessment to FOBT screening may thus prevent a substantial number of CRCs.     

Colorectal Cancer among Arab–Israeli Women—Possible Reasons for Increased Incidence and Mortality

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective in reducing its incidence by discovering precancerous polyps and detecting early cancer. Evidence indicates lower participation in screening programs among minority ethnic groups. In addition, the Israel Cancer Registry published an increase in the incidence of CRC among Israeli–Arab women. It is important to attempt to understand attitudes toward screening among Israeli–Arab women, assuming it has to do to lack of knowledge and compliance.

Methods

During the study period, a female team gave lectures in Arabic regarding CRC to women in 16 Arab villages. Prior to the lecture, the participants were asked to complete a questionnaire, obtaining information regarding CRC knowledge and screening. Following the lecture, FOBT kits were distributed. Two weeks later, a telephone survey was performed, regarding whether the FOBT was performed, the result of the test, and, if FOBT was not performed, the reasons for not completing the test.

Results

FOBT was performed by 17.8% prior to the lecture; 61% performed the FOBT following our lecture. Reasons cited for avoiding FOBT: 37% was “afraid of a positive result,” 32% avoided performing the test as they were concerned they would be further examined by a male physician; 47.8% concluded that Arab women lack knowledge regarding screening interventions; 23.9% neglect themselves from a health point of view; 11.6% advised that Arab women have no free time to perform tests.

Conclusions

Israeli–Arab women may be less knowledgeable concerning CRC. Educational efforts must be made to increase awareness and promote benefits of CRC screening, by targeting ethnic minorities and women in Israel.     

Effectiveness of a clinic-based colorectal cancer screening promotion program for underserved Hispanics

BACKGROUND:

Hispanics in the United States are less likely than other groups to receive screening services for colorectal cancer.

METHODS:

The authors conducted a clinic‐based individual randomized trial that enrolled Hispanic patients ages 50 to 79 years who had been seen in the Seattle‐based community clinic in the past 5 years. A total of 501 patients met the eligibility criteria and were randomized to 1 of 3 conditions: 1) usual care; 2) mailed fecal occult blood test (FOBT) card and instructions on how to complete the test (mailed FOBT only); and 3) mailed FOBT card and instructions on how to complete the test, telephone reminders, and home visits (mailed FOBT and outreach). The authors assessed postintervention differences in rates of FOBT screening in intervention and usual care groups using computerized medical records reviewed from June 2007 to March 2008.

RESULTS:

Data analysis occurred between November 2008 and September 2009. Nine‐month postintervention screening rates were 26% among patients who received the mailed packet only intervention (P < .001 compared with usual care) and 31% in the group that received the mailed packet and outreach intervention (P < .001 compared with usual care). This compared with 2% in the group that received usual care. Screening rates in the mailed FOBT only group and in the mailed FOBT and outreach group were not significantly different (P = .28).

CONCLUSIONS:

Culturally appropriate clinic‐based interventions may increase colorectal cancer screening among underserved Hispanics. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences Among African Americans: Which Screening Test is Preferred?

African Americans are diagnosed at late stages and suffer disproportionately higher mortality rates from colorectal cancer (CRC). Increasing their participation in CRC screening can help reduce these disparities. In-depth personal interviews were conducted with 60 African Americans to understand if CRC test preferences exist and to identify what attributes of screening tests influence test preferences. Most individuals interviewed preferred colonoscopy as compared to FOBT. Previous participation in CRC screening influenced how individuals made decisions about CRC screening. Enabling individuals without CRC screening experience to first complete FOBT might prepare them to later participate in colonoscopy screening.     

A trial of 3 interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening in African Americans

BACKGROUND:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. CRC incidence and mortality rates are higher among blacks than among whites, and screening rates are lower in blacks than in whites. For the current study, the authors tested 3 interventions that were intended to increase the rate of CRC screening among African Americans.

METHODS:

The following interventions were chosen to address evidence gaps in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Guide to Community Preventive Services: one‐on‐one education, group education, and reducing out‐of‐pocket costs. Three hundred sixty‐nine African‐American men and women aged ≥50 years were enrolled in this randomized, controlled community intervention trial. The main outcome measures were postintervention increase in CRC knowledge and obtaining a screening test within 6 months.

RESULTS:

There was substantial attrition: Two hundred fifty‐seven participants completed the intervention and were available for follow‐up 3 months to 6 months later. Among completers, there were significant increases in knowledge in both educational cohorts but in neither of the other 2 cohorts. By the 6‐month follow‐up, 17.7% (11 of 62 participants) of the Control cohort reported having undergone screening compared with 33.9% (22 of 65 participants) of the Group Education cohort (P = .039). Screening rate increases in the other 2 cohorts were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current results indicated that group education could increase CRC cancer screening rates among African Americans. The screening rate of <35% in a group of individuals who participated in an educational program through multiple sessions over a period of several weeks indicated that there still are barriers to overcome. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Determinants of colorectal cancer screening behavior among Chinese Americans

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among Chinese Americans and is the third leading cause of cancer death in this population. The objectives of this study were to determine the rates of CRC screening (via fecal occult blood test (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSIG), and colonoscopy) among Chinese Americans and predictors of utilizing these screening procedures. Participants (N = 206) completed a self-administered questionnaire assessing cancer screening behaviors and beliefs about perceived risk of developing cancer and treatment efficacy. A series of logistic regressions indicated that physician recommendation to obtain CRC screening significantly predicted whether Chinese Americans undergo FOBT, FSIG, or colonoscopy screening (p < 0.001). Acculturation and perceived risk of developing CRC did not predict obtaining any of the screening procedures. FOBT was the most commonly reported screening method used by respondents (65%), followed by FSIG (54%) and colonoscopy (49%). These findings highlight the need to make physicians more aware of the impact their recommendations have in determining CRC screening behavior among Chinese Americans.     

Predictors of adherence to repeat fecal occult blood test in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program

Background:

Socio-economic, environmental factors and general practitioner (GP) involvement may influence adherence to repeat faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) of organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The aim of the study was to identify predictors of adherence to repeat testing.

Methods:

The populationcomprised people eligible for the third round of a CRC screening programme in a French district (n=118 905). Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to identify individual and area-level characteristics associated with ‘compliant participants'' participating in the all three rounds vs ‘occasional participants'' participating in one or two rounds.

Results:

Compared to ‘occasional participants'', ‘compliant participants'' were more likely to participate after receiving a FOBT kit from their GP (odds ratio (OR), 10.7; 95% CI, 10.01–11.5) vs FOBT received at home, and were less likely to live in socio-economically deprived areas (OR, 0.75; 0.70–0.80) and urban areas (OR, 0.94; 0.88–1.00).

Conclusions:

As for a screening round participation, strategies aimed at improving the participation to a screening programme should target GPs and people living in socially deprived areas.     

The impact of population-based faecal occult blood test screening on colorectal cancer mortality: a matched cohort study

Background:

Randomised trials show reduced colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality with faecal occult blood testing (FOBT). This outcome is now examined in a routine, population-based, screening programme.

Methods:

Three biennial rounds of the UK CRC screening pilot were completed in Scotland (2000–2007) before the roll out of a national programme. All residents (50–69 years) in the three pilot Health Boards were invited for screening. They received a FOBT test by post to complete at home and return for analysis. Positive tests were followed up with colonoscopy. Controls, selected from non-pilot Health Boards, were matched by age, gender, and deprivation and assigned the invitation date of matched invitee. Follow-up was from invitation date to 31 December 2009 or date of death if earlier.

Results:

There were 379 655 people in each group (median age 55.6 years, 51.6% male). Participation was 60.6%. There were 961 (0.25%) CRC deaths in invitees, 1056 (0.28%) in controls, rate ratio (RR) 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–0.99) overall and 0.73 (95% CI 0.65–0.82) for participants. Non-participants had increased CRC mortality compared with controls, RR 1.21 (95% CI 1.06–1.38).

Conclusion:

There was a 10% relative reduction in CRC mortality in a routine screening programme, rising to 27% in participants.     

Predictors of colorectal cancer screening from patients enrolled in a managed care health plan

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing recognition of the importance of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in reducing cancer mortality, national screening rates are low, indicating a critical need to understand the barriers and remedies for underutilization of CRC screening tests. METHODS: Using results from independent cross-sectional telephone surveys with patients aged>or=50 years performed before (2000; n=498) and after (2003; n=482) a quality improvement intervention for CRC screening within a large managed care health plan, the trends and predictors of CRC screening with fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and/or endoscopy (flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy) were examined from a patient perspective. RESULTS: In 2000, patient reported screening rates within guidelines were 38% for any test, 23% for endoscopy, and 22% for FOBT. In 2003, screening rates increased to 50% for any test, 39% for endoscopy, and 24% for FOBT. Having discussed CRC with a doctor significantly increased the odds of being screened (FOBT: odds ratio [OR], 2.09 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.47-2.96]; endoscopy: OR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.67-3.26]; and any test: OR, 2.86 [95% CI, 2.06-3.96]), and reporting barriers to CRC in general decreased the odds of being screened (FOBT: OR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.60-0.95]; endoscopy: OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.60-0.92]; and any test: OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.54-0.80]). CONCLUSIONS: Although screening rates increased over the 3-year period, evidence was found of ongoing underutilization of CRC screening. The 2 strongest determinants of obtaining CRC screening were provider influence and patient barriers related to CRC screening in general, pointing to the need for multilevel interventions that target both the provider and patient.     

Long‐term risk of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy in a Danish gFOBT screening cohort

Faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is implemented in several countries. Approximately half of all screen positive persons have negative colonoscopy, but consensus is lacking on how these persons should be followed up. Health authorities in Denmark and The Netherlands recommend suspending screening for 8–10 years, while patients in UK are invited to screening after 2 years. In this cohort‐study, we followed 166,277 individuals invited to FOBT‐screening in 2005–2006 and a reference group comprising the remaining 1,240,348 Danes of the same age. We linked Danish population and health service registers to obtain information about colonoscopy outcome and incident CRC. We estimated CRC risk by colonoscopy outcome (adenoma, other colorectal pathology or negative colonoscopy) for the reference group, the screening group, and subgroups. Persons with positive screening FOBT followed by negative colonoscopy had the same long‐term CRC risk as persons with adenoma detected due to a positive screening FOBT (aHR 1.33, 95% CI: 0.65–2.71). We found no difference in the long‐term CRC risk between persons with negative colonoscopy after a positive FOBT screening test and the unscreened reference population (aHR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.62–1.78). Since FOBT screen positive persons in our study remained at average risk of CRC despite of a negative index colonoscopy, we question the safety of suspending FOBT screening for this group. It needs to be monitored whether recent efforts to improve colonoscopy quality have been successful in ensuring low CRC risk after negative colonoscopy also in FOBT positive persons.     

Underuse of colorectal cancer screening among men screened for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND:

Evidence suggests that colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces disease‐specific mortality, whereas the utility of prostate cancer screening remains uncertain. However, adherence rates for prostate cancer screening and CRC screening are very similar, with population‐based studies showing that approximately 50% of eligible US men are adherent to both tests. Among men scheduled to participate in a free prostate cancer screening program, the authors assessed the rates and correlates of CRC screening to determine the utility of this setting for addressing CRC screening nonadherence.

METHODS:

Participants (N = 331) were 50 to 70 years old with no history of prostate cancer or CRC. Men registered for free prostate cancer screening and completed a telephone interview 1 to 2 weeks before undergoing prostate cancer screening.

RESULTS:

One half of the participants who underwent free prostate cancer screening were eligible for but nonadherent to CRC screening. Importantly, 76% of the men who were nonadherent to CRC screening had a regular physician and/or health insurance, suggesting that CRC screening adherence was feasible in this group. Furthermore, multivariate analyses indicated that the only significant correlates of CRC screening adherence were having a regular physician, health insurance, and a history of prostate cancer screening.

CONCLUSIONS:

Free prostate cancer screening programs may provide a teachable moment to increase CRC screening among men who may not have the usual systemic barriers to CRC screening, at a time when they may be very receptive to cancer screening messages. In the United States, a large number of men participate in annual free prostate cancer screening programs and represent an easily accessible and untapped group that can benefit from interventions to increase CRC screening rates. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Effectiveness of a patient and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: the CHOICE trial

BACKGROUND:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality but is underused. Effective interventions to increase screening that can be implemented broadly are needed.

METHODS:

A controlled trial was conducted to evaluate a patient‐level and practice‐level intervention to increase the use of recommended CRC screening tests among health plan members. The patient‐level intervention was a patient decision aid and included stage‐targeted brochures that were mailed to health plan members. Intervention practices received academic detailing to prepare practices to facilitate CRC testing once patients were activated by the decision aid. We used patient surveys and claims data to assess CRC test completion.

RESULTS:

Among 443 active participants, 75.8% were ages 52 to 59 years, 80.9% were white, 62.1% were women, and 46.4% had college degrees or greater education. Among 380 active participants with known screening status at 12 months based on survey results, 39% in the intervention group reported receiving CRC screening compared with 32.2% in the usual care group (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval; [CI], 0.88‐2.05; P = .17). After adjusting for baseline differences and accounting for clustering, the effect was somewhat larger (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.98‐2.73; P = .06). Claims analysis produced similar effects for active participants. The intervention was more effective in those who had incomes >$50,000 (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.07‐4.35) than in those who had lower incomes (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.53‐2.94; P = .03 for interaction).

CONCLUSIONS:

Interventions combining a patient‐directed decision aid and practice‐directed academic detailing had a modest but statistically nonsignificant effect on CRC screening rates among active participants. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Changes in colorectal cancer screening use after introduction of alternative screening offer in Germany: Prospective cohort study

In October 2002, screening colonoscopy was added to the German colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program as an alternative to fecal occult blood test (FOBT). We aimed to evaluate the change in CRC screening use after introduction of the dual screening offer and to assess determinants of screening use. Data were drawn from a population-based cohort study initiated during 2000–2002 in Germany (n = 5,845, age range at recruitment: 50–75 years). We conducted both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses to obtain uptake rates of CRC screening based on four waves of data. Age-group specific proportions of participants having had FOBT within 2 years remained essentially unchanged at 61–67% between 2000 and 2002 (1st wave) and 2005–2007 (3rd wave). The proportions of participants having undergone screening colonoscopy within 10 years increased from 23–29% to 46–57%, leading to a substantial overall increase in being up-to-date with CRC screening from 66–68% to 77–80%. In 2008–2010 (4th wave), FOBT use declined and colonoscopy use continued to increase. Obesity was significantly associated with lower prevalence of being up-to-date with FOBT (odds ratio [OR] at 8-year follow-up 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.80) and screening colonoscopy (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62–0.86). Also, smokers were less likely to have ever used FOBT (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.40–0.75) or colonoscopy (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63–0.90) compared to nonsmokers. After the introduction of dual screening offer, the overall adherence to CRC screening steeply increased, mainly due to an increase in screening colonoscopy uptake. Screening tests kept being underused by obese people and smokers who are at elevated CRC risk.