Efficacy and safety of mirogabalin for the treatment of fibromyalgia: results from three 13-week randomized,double-blind,placebo- and active-controlled,parallel-group studies and a 52-week open-label extension study

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin, an α₂δ ligand, in patients with fibromyalgia (FM).

Methods: In three 13-week, multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 studies (studies A, B, and C), patients with FM (n?=?1293, 1270, and 1301, respectively) were randomized (1:1:1:1) to placebo, pregabalin 150?mg twice daily, mirogabalin 15?mg once daily or mirogabalin 15?mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was the change in weekly average daily worst pain score (ADPS) at week 13. Key secondary endpoints included Patient Global Impression of Change and change in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire total score. Long-term safety of mirogabalin was assessed in a 52-week extension study.

Results: Neither mirogabalin dose demonstrated a significant ADPS reduction from baseline vs. placebo at week 13 in any of the three studies. Pregabalin significantly reduced ADPS from baseline vs. placebo in studies B and C (p?=?.0008 and .0001, respectively). The effect of mirogabalin compared with placebo on key secondary endpoints was variable across the studies. Mirogabalin was well tolerated by most patients in the phase 3 studies; no unexpected adverse events occurring during the 52-week extension study.

Conclusion: While both mirogabalin doses were well tolerated by most patients and showed potential for reducing pain associated with FM, the primary endpoint of significant pain reduction in patients on mirogabalin compared with placebo was not achieved in any of the three randomized controlled studies.

Clinical trial registration: NCT02146430; NCT02187159; NCT02187471; and NCT02234583 (extension study).     

Evaluation of levalbuterol metered dose inhaler in pediatric patients with asthma: a double-blind,randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levalbuterol metered dose inhaler (MDI) in children aged 4-11 years (n = 173).

Research design and methods: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind 28‐day study of QID levalbuterol 90?µg, racemic albuterol 180?µg, and placebo (2:1:1 ratio). Serial spirometry was performed on Days 0, 14, and 28. The primary endpoint was the double-blind average peak percent (%) change in FEV₁ from visit pre-dose; the primary comparison was with placebo. Secondary endpoints included the area under the FEV₁ percent change from pre-dose curve and peak % predicted FEV₁. Safety endpoints included adverse events, laboratory tests, rescue medication use, and electrocardiograms.

Results: Levalbuterol significantly improved the least square mean peak percent change in FEV₁ compared with placebo (levalbuterol 25.6% ± 1.3% [p < 0.001]; racemic albuterol 21.8% ± 1.8% [p = ns]; placebo 16.8% ± 1.9%). Results for levalbuterol were similar for the other spirometry endpoints (?p < 0.05 vs. placebo). No levalbuterol-treated patients had a peak percent change in FEV₁ < 10% (compared with 15.8% of racemic albuterol-treated patients and 30.3% of placebo-treated patients). The incidence of adverse events was 43.4% for levalbuterol, 56.4% for racemic albuterol, and 51.4% for placebo. The rate of discontinuation was 1.3% for levalbuterol, 2.6% for racemic albuterol, and 8.6% for placebo. The rate of asthma attacks (10.5%, 12.8%, 14.3%, respectively) was similar among treatments. Levalbuterol and racemic albuterol both reduced rescue medication use (?p < 0.01 vs. placebo) and produced changes in ventricular heart rate and QT_c‐F that were similar to placebo.

Conclusions: In this study, levalbuterol administered via MDI significantly improved airway function in comparison with placebo in asthmatic children aged 4–11 years with a safety profile that was similar to placebo.     

Evaluation of levalbuterol metered dose inhaler in pediatric patients with asthma: a double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levalbuterol metered dose inhaler (MDI) in children aged 4-11 years (n = 173). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind 28-day study of QID levalbuterol 90 microg, racemic albuterol 180 mug, and placebo (2:1:1 ratio). Serial spirometry was performed on Days 0, 14, and 28. The primary endpoint was the double-blind average peak percent (%) change in FEV(1) from visit pre-dose; the primary comparison was with placebo. Secondary endpoints included the area under the FEV(1) percent change from pre-dose curve and peak % predicted FEV(1). Safety endpoints included adverse events, laboratory tests, rescue medication use, and electrocardiograms. RESULTS: Levalbuterol significantly improved the least square mean peak percent change in FEV(1) compared with placebo (levalbuterol 25.6% +/- 1.3% [p < 0.001]; racemic albuterol 21.8% +/- 1.8% [p = ns]; placebo 16.8% +/- 1.9%). Results for levalbuterol were similar for the other spirometry endpoints (p < 0.05 vs. placebo). No levalbuterol-treated patients had a peak percent change in FEV(1) < 10% (compared with 15.8% of racemic albuterol-treated patients and 30.3% of placebo-treated patients). The incidence of adverse events was 43.4% for levalbuterol, 56.4% for racemic albuterol, and 51.4% for placebo. The rate of discontinuation was 1.3% for levalbuterol, 2.6% for racemic albuterol, and 8.6% for placebo. The rate of asthma attacks (10.5%, 12.8%, 14.3%, respectively) was similar among treatments. Levalbuterol and racemic albuterol both reduced rescue medication use (p < 0.01 vs. placebo) and produced changes in ventricular heart rate and QT(c-F) that were similar to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, levalbuterol administered via MDI significantly improved airway function in comparison with placebo in asthmatic children aged 4-11 years with a safety profile that was similar to placebo.     

Assessment of the cardiac safety of prucalopride in healthy volunteers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled thorough QT study

AIMS

To assess steady-state effects of therapeutic and supra-therapeutic doses of prucalopride on the QT interval using a novel design involving a parallel placebo group with nested crossover for positive control.

METHODS

A double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled study was conducted in 120 healthy male and female volunteers ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00903747","term_id":"NCT00903747"}}NCT00903747). Volunteers were randomized to receive prucalopride 2–10 mg once daily (therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses, respectively) (group 1), placebo with 400 mg moxifloxacin on day 1 (group 2a), or placebo with moxifloxacin on day 15 (group 2b). Twelve-lead 24 h Holter ECGs recorded at various time-points were evaluated blind and centrally.

RESULTS

Estimated mean difference in study specific corrected QT interval (QT_cSS) time-matched change from baseline between prucalopride (2 and 10 mg) and placebo was <5 ms at all time points (maximum mean difference: 3.83 ms at 3.5 h post dose on day 5 with 2 mg [90% Cl −0.33, 6.38 ms]). Upper limits of the two-sided 90% CI for QT_cSS were all <10 ms. There were no outlying QT_cSS values >450 ms and no subjects had an increase >60 ms following prucalopride. Moxifloxacin produced the expected significant changes in QT_cSS (>5 ms, maximum of +12.7 ms at 5 h post dose) at all time-points except 1 h post dose. Prucalopride resulted in small increases in heart rate (maximum of 5.8 beats min^–1), which were similar for 2 and 10 mg. Prucalopride was well tolerated after first day of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Prucalopride at both therapeutic and supra therapeutic doses has no clinically significant effects on cardiac repolarisation in healthy volunteers.     

Efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release for the management of chronic low back pain: results of a prospective,randomized, double-blind,placebo- and active-controlled Phase III study

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release (ER) for the management of moderate to severe chronic low back pain.

Research design: Patients (N = 981) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive tapentadol ER 100 – 250 mg b.i.d., oxycodone HCl controlled release (CR) 20 – 50 mg b.i.d., or placebo over 15 weeks (3-week titration period, 12-week maintenance period).

Main outcome measures: Efficacy was assessed as change from baseline in average pain intensity (11-point NRS) at week 12 of the maintenance period and throughout the maintenance period; last observation carried forward was used to impute missing pain scores. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study.

Results: Tapentadol ER significantly reduced average pain intensity versus placebo at week 12 (least squares mean difference vs placebo [95% confidence interval], ?0.8 [?1.22, ?0.47]; p < 0.001) and throughout the maintenance period (?0.7 [?1.06,?0.35]; p < 0.001). Oxycodone CR significantly reduced average pain intensity versus placebo at week 12 (?0.9 [?1.24,?0.49]; p < 0.001) and throughout the maintenance period (?0.8 [?1.16,?0.46]; p < 0.001). Tapentadol ER was associated with a lower incidence of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) than oxycodone CR. Gastrointestinal TEAEs, including constipation, nausea, and vomiting, were among the most commonly reported TEAEs (placebo, 26.3%; tapentadol ER, 43.7%; oxycodone CR, 61.9%). The odds of experiencing constipation or the composite of nausea and/or vomiting were significantly lower with tapentadol ER than with oxycodone CR (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Tapentadol ER (100 – 250 mg b.i.d.) effectively relieved moderate to severe chronic low back pain over 15 weeks and had better gastrointestinal tolerability than oxycodone HCl CR (20 – 50 mg b.i.d.).     

Tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the once-daily human GLP-1 analog liraglutide in Japanese healthy subjects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-escalation study

OBJECTIVES: Liraglutide is a once-daily human GLP-1 analog being developed as a Type 2 diabetes therapy. A dose-finding study in Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes showed liraglutide to produce dose-dependent decreases in HbA(1C). Studies have also shown that, with stepped dose titration, liraglutide is well tolerated. This double-blind trial in 24 healthy Japanese men assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once-daily subcutaneous (s.c.) liraglutide using doses exceeding those previously studied, and using the stepped titration approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were randomized to three groups in each of which 6 received liraglutide, and 2 placebo for 35 consecutive days. The daily dose of liraglutide was stepped from 5 microg/kg (s.c. abdomen, morning) to 10 and then 15 microg/kg at 7-day intervals. One group remained at this dose, the others titrating further to 20 and 25 microg/kg, respectively. Subjects remained at the study site from Day 21 until the end of the trial, with standard meals served during inhouse periods. RESULTS: No safety issues, hypoglycemia, gastrointestinal or any other adverse events were observed. Liraglutide showed dose-dependent increases in the pharmacokinetic parameters of AUC0-24 h, C(max) and C(trough), while t(max), t(1/2) and V(d/F) were constant. Mean plasma glucose concentrations were similar across all treatment groups at baseline, but dose-dependent decreases in mean and postprandial plasma glucose were seen with liraglutide, although all values remained within normal ranges. There was a tendency for weight to decrease with liraglutide in comparison to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Liraglutide appears to be well tolerated at doses of up to 25 microg/kg in Japanese subjects. Despite clear pharmacodynamic effects in this euglycemic cohort, a low risk for hypoglycemia was suggested together with good gastrointestinal tolerability.     

Tapentadol prolonged-release for moderate-to-severe chronic osteoarthritis knee pain: a double-blind,randomized, placebo- and oxycodone controlled release-controlled study

Objective: To assess efficacy and safety of tapentadol prolonged release (PR) for moderate-to-severe chronic osteoarthritis knee pain.

Methods: Patients (n?=?990) were randomized (1:1:1) to tapentadol PR, oxycodone controlled release (CR; reference compound for assay sensitivity), or placebo for a double-blind 3-week titration and 12-week maintenance period. Primary efficacy end-points were change from baseline in average pain intensity at week 12 of maintenance (US end-point) and over the entire maintenance period (non-US end-point) with “last observation carried forward” as imputation method for missing scores.

Results: Both primary end-points were not significantly different for tapentadol PR nor for oxycodone CR vs placebo at week 12 (least squares [LS] mean difference?=?–0.3 [95% CI?=?–0.61–0.09]; p?=?0.152 and 0.2 [95% CI?=?–0.16–0.54]; p?=?0.279, respectively) and over the maintenance period (LS mean difference?=?–0.2 [95% CI?=?–0.55–0.07]; p?=?0.135 and 0.1 [95% CI?=?–0.18–0.44]; p?=?0.421, respectively). Considerably more patients receiving tapentadol PR than oxycodone CR completed the trial (58.3% vs 36.6%). This is consistent with better results with tapentadol PR on the overall health status (PGIC) compared to oxycodone CR. Indeed, respectively, 56% and 42.5% rated at least “much improved” at the end of treatment. Incidences of gastrointestinal adverse events were higher for both active treatments compared to placebo. Tapentadol PR was associated with a better gastrointestinal tolerability profile with incidences of constipation (17.9% vs 35%) and of the composite of nausea and/or vomiting (23.8% vs 46.8%) significantly lower vs oxycodone CR (p?Conclusions: The study did not demonstrate assay sensitivity. The finding that both primary end-points for tapentadol PR were not met can, thus, not be interpreted. Tapentadol PR was better tolerated than oxycodone CR, largely due to fewer gastrointestinal side-effects.     

Effect of lurasidone on neurocognitive performance in patients with schizophrenia: A short-term placebo- and active-controlled study followed by a 6-month double-blind extension

This double-blind study evaluated change in cognitive performance and functional capacity in lurasidone and quetiapine XR-treated schizophrenia patients over a 6-week, placebo-controlled study, followed by a 6-month, double-blind extension. Cognitive performance and functional capacity were assessed with the CogState computerized cognitive battery and the UPSA-B. Analyses were conducted for all subjects, as well as the subsample whose test scores met prespecified validity criteria. No statistically significant differences were found for change in the composite neurocognitive score for lurasidone (80 mg/day and 160 mg/day) groups, quetiapine XR and placebo in the full sample at week 6. For the evaluable sample (N=267), lurasidone 160 mg was superior to both placebo and quetiapine on the neurocognitive composite, while lurasidone 80 mg, quetiapine XR, and placebo did not differ. UPSA-B scores were superior to placebo at 6 weeks for all treatments. In the double-blind extension study, analysis of the full sample showed significantly better cognitive performance in the lurasidone (40–160 mg) group compared to the quetiapine XR (200–800 mg) group at both 3 and 6 months. Cognitive and UPSA-B total scores were significantly correlated at baseline and for change over time. This is the first study to date where the investigational treatment was superior to placebo on both cognitive assessments and a functional coprimary measure at 6 weeks, as well as demonstrated superiority to an active comparator on cognitive assessments at 6 weeks and at 6 months of extension study treatment. These findings require replication, but are not due to practice effects, because of the placebo and active controls.     

Absence of adverse effects of oseltamivir on sleep: a double-blind, randomized study in healthy volunteers in Japan

Influenza-associated neuropsychiatric symptoms include parasomnias such as sleepwalking which is a common sleep disturbance in childhood. Oseltamivir is a widely used antiviral drug for influenza. Recently, sleepwalking-like events have been reported in patients with influenza receiving oseltamivir. We investigated whether oseltamivir itself has effects on sleep. In this crossover study, healthy Japanese male volunteers were randomized into two treatment groups, each of which comprised two double-blind 4-day treatment periods. In the first period, group A received 75 mg oseltamivir (evening dose) on day 3, followed by 75 mg b.i.d. on day 4, and placebo in the second period. Group B received the same treatments, but in reverse order. Polysomnographic assessments were performed on all four nights of each treatment period. Pharmacokinetics were assessed during a 2-day open-label phase beginning on day 12. Thirty-one volunteers aged 20-24 years were enrolled. No volunteer had electroencephalographic abnormalities, and no abnormal behaviour was observed. Sleep parameters measured over the whole night and during early- and late sleep periods (first and last thirds of the night) were very similar for oseltamivir and placebo, although the amount of stage 2 sleep in the middle sleep period was slightly greater with oseltamivir. Pharmacokinetics for oseltamivir phosphate in groups A and B were very similar, but for oseltamivir carboxylate, AUC and C(max) values were higher in group B, probably because this group received oseltamivir on the evening of day 11. Oseltamivir was well tolerated. Oseltamivir did not produce clinically relevant changes on nocturnal polysomnographic variables in young Japanese men.     

Acute dose-dependent effects of lysergic acid diethylamide in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in healthy subjects

Growing interest has been seen in using lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) in psychiatric research and therapy. However, no modern studies have evaluated subjective and autonomic effects of different and pharmaceutically well-defined doses of LSD. We used a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover design in 16 healthy subjects (eight women, eight men) who underwent six 25 h sessions and received placebo, LSD (25, 50, 100, and 200 µg), and 200 µg LSD 1 h after administration of the serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine-2A (5-HT_2A) receptor antagonist ketanserin (40 mg). Test days were separated by at least 10 days. Outcome measures included self-rating scales that evaluated subjective effects, autonomic effects, adverse effects, plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels, and pharmacokinetics up to 24 h. The pharmacokinetic-subjective response relationship was evaluated. LSD showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and first-order elimination and dose-dependently induced subjective responses starting at the 25 µg dose. A ceiling effect was observed for good drug effects at 100 µg. The 200 µg dose of LSD induced greater ego dissolution than the 100 µg dose and induced significant anxiety. The average duration of subjective effects increased from 6.7 to 11 h with increasing doses of 25–200 µg. LSD moderately increased blood pressure and heart rate. Ketanserin effectively prevented the response to 200 µg LSD. The LSD dose–response curve showed a ceiling effect for subjective good effects, and ego dissolution and anxiety increased further at a dose above 100 µg. These results may assist with dose finding for future LSD research. The full psychedelic effects of LSD are primarily mediated by serotonin 5-HT_2A receptor activation.Subject terms: Drug development, Pharmacology, Human behaviour     

Concentration-QT analysis of the randomized,placebo- and moxifloxacin-controlled thorough QT study of umeclidinium monotherapy and umeclidinium/vilanterol combination in healthy subjects

The long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC) is approved as a once-daily monotherapy and in combination with the long-acting β₂ agonist vilanterol (VI) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The objective of this analysis was to assess the relationship between observed plasma UMEC and/or VI concentrations and QT interval corrected using Fridericia’s correction (QTcF). 103 subjects were enrolled and 86 (83 %) completed the study. Subjects were randomized to 4 of 5 repeat-dose treatments (days 1–10: n = 77 subjects received placebo, n = 76 UMEC 500 µg, n = 78 UMEC/VI 125/25 µg, or n = 76 UMEC/VI 500/100 µg; day 10: n = 74 oral tablet moxifloxacin 400 mg [positive control]). The concentration-QTcF interval relationship was examined using nonlinear mixed-effects methods. For UMEC, predicted QTcF interval prolongation (at observed geometric mean of maximum plasma concentrations) was ?2.38 ms (90 % prediction interval [PI] ?3.82, ?0.85) with UMEC 500 µg and ?0.50 ms (90 % PI ?0.80, ?0.18) and ?2.01 ms (90 % PI ?3.22, ?0.72) with UMEC/VI 125/25 µg and 500/100 µg, respectively. For VI, estimates were 5.89 ms (90 % PI 4.89, 6.91) and 7.23 ms (90 % PI 5.88, 8.55) with UMEC/VI 125/25 µg and 500/100 µg, respectively. Combined additive mean effects were estimated for UMEC/VI 125/25 µg (5.39 ms [90 % PI 4.40, 6.47]) and 500/100 µg (5.22 ms [90 % PI 3.72, 6.80]). The model-predicted decrease with UMEC and increase with UMEC/VI combination in QTcF interval suggest that the QT effect is likely attributable to VI. These model-predicted results support those of previously-published traditional statistical analyses.     

Plethysmography and impulse oscillometry assessment of tiotropium and ipratropium bromide; a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study in healthy subjects

AIMS: Spirometry, plethysmography and impulse oscillometry (IOS) measure different aspects of lung function. These methods have not been compared for their ability to assess long- and short-acting anticholinergic agents. We therefore performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way cross-over study in 30 healthy subjects. METHODS: Single doses of tiotropium bromide (Tio) 54 and 18 mcg, ipratropium bromide (IB) 40 mcg and placebo were administered. Specific conductance (sGaw), total lung capacity (TLC), inspiratory capacity (IC) and residual volume (RV) were measured using plethysmography, while IOS measured resistance (R5-25) and reactance (RF and X5). Pulmonary function was measured for 26 h post dose. RESULTS: Tio caused significant improvements in sGaw, forced expiratory voume in 1 s (FEV(1)), maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) and R5-R25 at time points up to 26 h, with no clear differences between doses. IB improved the same parameters, but only up to 8 h. The weighted mean change (0-24 h) caused by Tio 54 mcg compared with placebo for FEV(1) was 240 ml (95% confidence interval 180, 300), while for sGaw the ratio of geometric means (Tio compared with placebo) was 1.35 (1.28, 1.41). Neither drug caused consistent statistically significant changes in RF, forced vital capacity, TLC or IC over 26 h. RV was significantly improved from 8 to 24 h by Tio 54 mcg only. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to spirometry, IOS resistance measurements and sGaw can distinguish between the effects of long- and shortacting anticholinergic effects in healthy subjects.     

Duloxetine increases serotonin and norepinephrine availability in healthy subjects: a double-blind, controlled study.

Evidence suggests that compounds that increase the synaptic availability of more than one neurotransmitter have greater efficacy in the treatment of depression than single-acting drugs. Preclinical studies indicate that duloxetine acts to inhibit serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporters. The ability of duloxetine to alter 5-HT and NE reuptake was tested in 12 healthy male subjects. Placebo, desipramine 50 mg b.i.d., and duloxetine (80 mg q.d. or 60 mg b.i.d.) were compared in a randomized, double-blind, three-period crossover study in 12 healthy male subjects. Whole-blood 5-HT, urinary excretion of NE and major metabolites, and TYR PD30 (IV tyramine pressor dose needed to increase systolic blood pressure by 30 mmHg) were measured at steady state. Vital signs were measured periodically. Duloxetine affected 5-HT reuptake, with whole-blood 5-HT depletion vs placebo (80 mg q.d.: p=0.07; 60 mg b.i.d.: p=0.02; combined regimens: p=0.01). Cardiovascular changes reflecting increased sympathetic tone were observed with both duloxetine and desipramine, and both treatments significantly decreased whole body NE turnover (p<0.01). Duloxetine and desipramine were associated with similar mean increases in fractional extraneuronal NE concentration, although these changes did not reach statistical significance. TYR PD30 increased significantly with desipramine dosing (p<0.01). In conclusion, whole-blood measurements confirm that duloxetine inhibits platelet 5-HT uptake in vivo. Urinary and cardiovascular measurements suggest that duloxetine has an effect on NE synthesis and turnover, indicative of NE reuptake inhibition. The lack of a detectable impact of duloxetine on TYR PD30 suggests that this may not be the most sensitive indirect measure of NE reuptake when assessing dual reuptake inhibitors.     

Long-term safety and tolerability of lurasidone in schizophrenia: a 12-month, double-blind, active-controlled study

The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of lurasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia. Clinically stable adult outpatients with schizophrenia were randomized in a 2 : 1 ratio to 12 months of double-blind treatment with once-daily, flexibly-dosed lurasidone (40-120 mg) or risperidone (2-6 mg). Outcome measures included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, ECG, and laboratory tests. Secondary assessments included measures of psychopathology. A total of 427 patients were randomized to treatment with lurasidone and 202 with risperidone. The three most frequent AEs in the lurasidone group (vs. risperidone) were nausea (16.7 vs. 10.9%), insomnia (15.8 vs. 13.4%), and sedation (14.6 vs. 13.9%); the three most frequent AEs in the risperidone group (vs. lurasidone) were increased weight (19.8 vs. 9.3%), somnolence (17.8 vs. 13.6%), and headache (14.9 vs. 10.0%). A higher proportion of patients receiving risperidone had at least a 7% endpoint increase in weight (14 vs. 7%). The median endpoint change in prolactin was significantly higher for risperidone (P<0.001). A comparable improvement in efficacy measures was observed with both agents and the rates of relapse were similar. All-cause discontinuation rates were higher for lurasidone versus risperidone. Long-term treatment with lurasidone was generally well tolerated in this study, with minimal effects on weight and metabolic outcomes.     

Antiparkinsonian drug-induced sleepiness: a double-blind placebo-controlled study of L-dopa, bromocriptine and pramipexole in healthy subjects

AIMS

To assess the sleepiness induced by pramipexole, a D2/D3-dopamine receptor agonist commonly used in Parkinson''s disease and restless legs syndrome, without the problem of the confounding factors related to the disease.

METHODS

Placebo, bromocriptine (2.5 mg), L-dopa (100 mg) and pramipexole (0.5 mg) were administered in a single oral dose on four separate days, with at least a 2-week wash-out period in a randomized cross-over design. Induced somnolence was assessed using Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) and subjective scaling of vigilance. Twelve male subjects (26.3 ± 5.5 years old) without anxiety, mood, sleep or sedation disorders were enrolled.

RESULTS

Pramipexole significantly reduced mean sleep latency compared with placebo 3 h 30 min [−6.1 min (−9.8, −2.4), P = 0.002] and 5 h 30 min [−5.6 min (−7.7, −3.5), P = 0.003] after administration. In addition, the total duration of sleep during the tests was higher with pramipexole than with placebo [+6.0 min (2.3, 9.7), P < 0.001]. These differences were not observed with L-dopa and bromocriptine in comparison with placebo. The induced sleepiness was not associated with an increase in subjective somnolence scaling, indicating that this adverse event may occur without prior warning.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that a single oral dose of pramipexole induces sleepiness as assessed by MSLT in healthy young subjects, independent of disease-related sleep dysfunction.     

Efficacy and safety of tapentadol prolonged release formulation in the treatment of elderly patients with moderate-to-severe chronic osteoarthritis knee pain: a pooled analysis of two double-blind,randomized, placebo-, and active-controlled trials

Objective: To compare efficacy and safety of tapentadol prolonged release (PR) vs oxycodone controlled release (CR) in younger patients (<65?years of age) and in elderly patients (≥65 and ≥75 years of age) in the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic osteoarthritis (OA) knee pain.

Methods: Data from two double-blind, randomized, placebo-, and oxycodone CR-controlled phase 3 trials were pooled and stratified by age. Primary efficacy end-points were change from baseline in average pain intensity at week 12 (US end-point) and over the entire maintenance period (non-US end-point).

Results: A total of 1357 patients <65?years, 653 patients ≥65?years, and 176 patients ≥75?years of age were assessed. The comparison between tapentadol PR and oxycodone CR showed numerically better pain relief under tapentadol PR for both primary end-points in all three age groups. More favorable improvements were also observed for patient global impression of change, the Short Form-36 physical component score, and EuroQoL-5Dimensions health status index. In the elderly, incidences of dizziness and somnolence were comparable between active treatments, but incidences of nausea, vomiting, and constipation were considerably lower under tapentadol PR. Treatment completion rates were lowest under oxycodone CR;?>?50% of elderly oxycodone CR patients named side-effects as the main reason for discontinuation.

Conclusions: Tapentadol PR was effective in the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic OA pain in elderly and younger patients. Compared to oxycodone CR, the overall and the gastrointestinal tolerability profile in particular were better in all tapentadol PR groups, regardless of age.