Histologic evaluation of mineralized and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft for ridge and sinus augmentations

The objective of this study was to quantify new bone formation from biopsies of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) following ridge and sinus augmentations. Ninety-three patients who received maxillary sinus or ridge augmentation grafts agreed to core biopsies of their grafts when the implants were placed. Samples ranged from 6 to 36 months postgrafting. These samples were sectioned, stained, and examined histomorphometrically Seventy-two FDBA and 21 DFDBA samples were examined, and the mean percentages of new bone formed were 41.89% and 41.74%, respectively. There was no statistical difference, irrespective of graft site.     

Histomorphometric evaluation of guided bone regeneration around implants with SLA surface: an experimental study in beagle dogs

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of collagen membranes, either alone or combined with a human demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) or natural bovine bone graft, in bone defects around dental implants with an SLA (sand-blasted, large grit, acid-etched) surface. The experiments were carried out in three beagle dogs using a split-mouth design. On one side of the jaw, three implants were placed and intra-bony defects were created and covered with a collagen membrane, randomly combined in two of the defects with human DFDBA or inorganic bovine bone graft. A control implant, without membrane covering or defect filling, was also placed. On the other side of the jaw, three implants were placed and the bone defects were treated in a similar fashion, but without membrane covering. The studied variables were the percentage of bone-to-implant contact within the limits of the initial bony defect and percentage of the original bony defect occupied by bone tissue. Although no statistically significant differences were found in this study between the membrane and nonmembrane groups, bone defects augmented with anorganic bovine bone and membranes showed the most promising results from a histological and histomorphometric perspective.     

Histologic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts in barrier membrane covered periodontal fenestration wounds and ectopic sites in dogs

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate healing responses to demineralized freeze-dried bone powder allografts in standardized periodontal fenestration defects, compared with subcutaneous wounds in a dog model. METHODS: Circular periodontal fenestration defects were created buccally at all four canines in 14 mongrel dogs. Each site received one of the following underneath a barrier membrane: (a) ethylene oxide (EO)-sterilized demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBA), (b) heat-treated DFDBA, (c) non-sterilized DFDBA and (d) ungrafted control. Twelve of the 14 dogs had three subcutaneous chest wall pouches created and one of the three DFDBA materials placed in each. The animals were necropsied at 4 weeks. Histologic sections were prepared through the center of the fenestration sites in an apico-coronal direction. Quantitative analysis using computer-assisted imaging technique was performed. Subcutaneous implants were evaluated histologically and quantified for associated inflammatory cell infiltrate. RESULTS: Fenestration defects healed by partial osseous fill and cementum regeneration with formation of a periodontal ligament. The graft particles generally appeared isolated from the site of osteogenesis and covered by cementum-like substance. Graft particles incorporated into newly formed bone at a distance from the root surface was the exception. No statistically significant differences in new bone formation were observed between treatment groups within animals, but significant inter-animal variation was found (p<0.01). Quantities of retained graft particles were limited, and without cellular resorption. A bone augmentation effect was associated with the barrier in the majority of sites. No bone formation was evident at the subcutaneous sites where graft particles displayed distinctly modified surface zones and multinucleated giant cell resorption. Significantly more inflammatory infiltrate was associated with EO-sterilized grafts compared with heat-treated grafts (p=0.05). CONCLUSION: Implantation of DFDBA neither enhanced osseous healing in periodontal fenestration defects, nor resulted in ectopic bone induction. DFDBA particles implanted in either periodontal fenestration or subcutaneous wounds evoked distinctly different healing responses.     

Clinical and histologic evaluation of a mineralized block allograft: results from the developmental period (2001-2004)

This article reports on a multicenter evaluation of a novel, sterile, antigen-inactivated, mineralized block allograft in humans during a 3-year developmental period. Consecutive partially edentulous patients (n = 73) with severe localized ridge defects (n = 82) were treated with the material. After 4 to 6 months of healing, tapered screw implants were placed in the grafted bone and subsequently restored. Patients were monitored 25 to 36 months after prosthetic restoration. A biopsy was taken of one patient and submitted for histomorphometric analysis. Block allograft survival was 93% at 12 months, and resorption ranged from none (69%) to slight (0 to 2 mm) (31%) for all surviving allografts. Seven block allografts failed and were removed because of improper contouring, prosthesis impingement, and/or infection. The sites were successfully re-treated and restored with dental implants. Soft tissue dehiscence was successfully treated in seven other sites. Implant survival was 99%. One implant failed without allograft failure. It was replaced with a larger-diameter implant, treated with guided bone regeneration, and subsequently restored. Histomorphometric analysis showed rapid incorporation of the allograft at 6 months without inflammation or necrosis. The block allografts were more technique-sensitive than autografts, which necessitated meticulous surgical technique and follow-up. Short-term results for the block allografts indicated a high degree of predictability, but long-term follow-up is needed.     

Autogenous masticatory mucosal grafts in extraction socket seal procedures: a comparison between sockets grafted with demineralized freeze‐dried bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral

Successful preservation of the edentulous ridge after extractions may eliminate or reduce the need for ridge augmentation procedures. It has been claimed that grafting fresh extraction sockets and sealing them with autogenous soft tissue grafts promote ridge preservation after tooth extraction. In this study, the survival of free autogenous connective tissue grafts sealing extraction sites was evaluated. In 24 healthy patients, 42 maxillary anterior teeth were extracted. After socket debridement, soft tissue margins of the socket orifice were carefully cut to remove epithelial debris, Sockets were filled with either demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBA) or deproteinized natural bovine bone mineral xenograft (DBBMX) to the level of the alveolar bone crest. Circular connective tissue grafts, slightly larger in diameter than the soft tissue socket orifice, were obtained and placed on top of the filler graft material sealing the sockets. Grafts were stabilized and secured by sutures and inspected weekly for the first month. The grafts were classified into 3 groups according to clinical parameters: vital, partially vital and non-vital. After 1 week, 18 grafts were vital, 13 partially vital and 11 non-vital. When only 1 sample unit (1 site per patient) was compared between DFDBA and DBBMX grafted sockets, no significant difference in graft vitality was shown (P = 0.34 for vital; P = 0.67 for vital plus partially vital). After 1 month, all socket orifices were sealed with mucosa. Based on the present observations, it seems that connective tissue grafts sealing fresh extraction sites are mainly dependent on underlying tissue vascularization and that sealing grafted fresh extraction sockets filled with bone substitute allograft or xenograft materials may be beneficial but an unpredictable procedure.     

Histologic Healing Following Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized Versus Combined Mineralized‐Demineralized Freeze‐Dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: Mineralized and demineralized freeze‐dried bone allografts (FDBAs) are used in alveolar ridge (AR) preservation; however, each material has advantages and disadvantages. Combinations of allografts aimed at capitalizing on the advantages each offers are available. To date, there is no evidence to indicate if a combination allograft is superior in this application. The primary objective of this study is to histologically evaluate and compare healing of non‐molar extraction sites grafted with either mineralized FDBA or a 70:30 mineralized:demineralized FDBA combination allograft in AR preservation. The secondary objective is to compare dimensional changes in ridge height and width after grafting with these two materials. Methods: Forty‐two patients randomized into two equal groups received ridge preservation with either 100% mineralized FDBA (active control group) or the combination 70% mineralized: 30% demineralized allograft (test group). Sites were allowed to heal for 18 to 20 weeks, at which time core biopsies were obtained and dental implants were placed. AR dimensions were evaluated at the time of extraction and at implant placement, including change in ridge width and change in buccal and lingual ridge height. Histomorphometric analysis was performed to determine percentage of vital bone, residual graft, and connective tissue/other non‐bone components. Results: There was no significant difference between groups in AR dimensional changes. Combination allograft produced increased vital bone percentage (36.16%) compared to the FDBA group (24.69%; P = 0.0116). The combination allograft also had a significantly lower mean percentage of residual graft particles (18.24%) compared to FDBA (27.04%; P = 0.0350). Conclusions: This study provides the first histologic evidence showing greater new bone formation with a combination mineralized/demineralized allograft compared to 100% mineralized FDBA in AR preservation in humans. Combination allograft results in increased vital bone formation while providing similar dimensional stability of the AR compared to FDBA alone in AR preservation.     

Clinical evaluation of demineralized bone allograft in a hyaluronic acid carrier for sinus lift augmentation in humans: a computed tomography and histomorphometric study

OBJECTIVES: Natural and synthetic graft materials are used routinely in sinus floor augmentations to help support implants in atrophic maxillary ridges. This clinical study was based on the hypothesis that the clinical effectiveness of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft/demineralized bone matrix (DFDBA/DBM) in sinus lifts varies when used in combination bone graft substitute materials. To test this hypothesis, DFDBA was used together with one of three materials: in saline plus anorganic bone (DFDBA: Bio-Oss; in hyaluronic acid (DFDBA: HY, 32 : 68, w/w; DBX alone; DBX plus Bio-Oss; and DBX plus tricalcium phosphate granules (beta-TCP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two sinus lift procedures, eight per group, were performed on 26 patients. Before surgery and at 8 months post-surgery when implants were placed, ridge heights were visualized by computed tomography (CT) and measured by morphometric analysis. Cores of bone were removed by trephine at the sites of implant placement; these biopsies from the graft sites were used for histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS: All 32 sinus lift elevations were successful when measured by CT, increasing from an average 2.84+/-0.2 mm before treatment to 15.2+/-0.6 mm after treatment. The percent of each biopsy that was occupied by new bone and incorporated bone graft materials varied with each treatment: DFDBA+Bio-Oss, DBX+Bio-Oss, or DBX alone was higher than that for DBX+beta-TCP by approximately 10%. When comparing only newly formed bone, DBX+beta-TCP treatment resulted in 50% less bone than the other three preparations. All grafted sites received implants as per the treatment plan for each patient. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the hypothesis that new bone formation is dependent on the DFDBA formulation used and demonstrated that DBX, alone or in combination with other materials, can be used successfully for sinus floor elevation.     

Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone: a clinical report of long-term results

PURPOSE: The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the survival rate of titanium plasma spray-coated cylindric and machined screw-type implants placed in sinuses grafted with anorganic bovine bone mixed with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) or with anorganic bovine bone alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients included in this study were treated with a 1- or 2-stage technique, according to the volume of residual bone. This determined the possibility of primary stabilization and the duration of the treatment, which was 9 or 12 months, respectively. RESULTS: The overall implant survival rate was 94.5% after a mean functioning period of 6.5 +/- 1.9 years. The Implant survival rate was better in sinuses grafted with anorganic bovine bone alone than with a mixture of anorganic bovine bone with DFDBA (96.8% versus 90%). The implant survival rate was similar for cylindric and screw-type implants in sinuses grafted with anorganic bovine bone alone. DISCUSSION: Because of the good bone quality, the implant survival rate was similar for cylindric and screw-type implants in sinuses grafted with anorganic bovine bone. CONCLUSION: Anorganic bovine bone used alone appears to be a suitable material for sinus floor augmentation.     

Clinical and Histologic Observations of Sites Implanted With Intraoral Autologous Bone Grafts or Allografts. 15 Human Case Reports

The cases reported in this paper were treated at 7 different clinical centers and present clinical and histologic observations from 15 patients and 21 human biopsies. The biopsies were taken from extraction sockets or dental implant sites which were grafted with either autologous intra-oral bone (6 sites), demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDBA) (7 sites), or mineralized freeze-dried bone (MFDBA) (7 sites), or a combination of autologous bone, DFDBA and a barrier membrane (1 site). Six sites were grafted with DFDBA and augmented with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) barrier membranes. Biopsies for histological evaluation were taken 4 to 13 months after implantation. A bone scoring system of 0 to 4 was used to evaluate the sections for dead implanted particles or the presence of vital bone. A bone score of 3 indicated the presence of dead implant material, blood vessels, islands of cartilage, osteoblasts, and new bone formation. A score of 4 indicated total replacement of the implanted material by the host bone. The average bone score for sites which received autologous bone was 2.33; for DFDBA sites, 0.98; and MFDBA was 0.18. The over-riding histologic characteristic of sites implanted with DFDBA or MFDBA was retention of non-vital graft particles within fibrous connective tissue. Biopsies taken adjacent to the host bed demonstrated incorporation of the allografts (osteoconduction). Sites grafted with autologous bone chips also demonstrated non-vital bone chips surrounded by vital host bone (osteoconduction). Sites which received barrier membranes did not appear to improve or impair bone healing of the augmented sites. Autologous bone chips harvested from within the oral cavity as well as allografts may serve as biologic fillers, but do not apparently contribute to osteoinduction. Autologous bone will eventually be resorbed and replaced by the host. DFDBA and MFDBA are resorbed very slowly and apparently do not contribute to osteoinduction. Allografts apparently are not resorbed by osteoclasts and therefore their continued use around dental implants is questioned. J Periodontol 1996;67:1025–1033.     

In vitro evaluation of the mitogenic effect of platelet-derived growth factor-BB on human periodontal ligament cells cultured with various bone allografts

BACKGROUND: Several studies have documented the role of growth factors in periodontal regeneration. It has been shown that platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is a potent stimulator of human periodontal ligament (PDL) cells. A variety of bone graft materials are used to treat osseous defects caused by periodontal disease. We evaluated the mitogenic effect of PDGF on human PDL cells cultured with different allografts to determine which of the allografts with or without PDGF promoted periodontal regeneration. METHODS: Two human demineralized freeze-dried allografts of cortical (DFDBA) and cancellous (DFBA) bone and a non-demineralized freeze-dried allograft (FBA) from cancellous bone were used alone or supplemented with PDGF-BB. Human PDL cultures were derived from the mid-root of 2 maxillary premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons. Cells were grown separately in 24-well dishes with or without 20 mg of each bone allograft. On day 2 of quiescence, new medium was added with 10 ng/ml of PDGF-BB. DNA synthesis was estimated by measuring [3H] thymidine incorporation to determine the effects of the test agents on cell proliferation. Cells were processed and subjected to scintillation counting after 48 hours of incubation. Counts per minute (cpm/well) were determined for each sample. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference (P<0.05) on PDL cell proliferation when the allografts were used alone. PDL cells exhibited significantly greater proliferative responses to the 2 demineralized bone allografts, DFDBA and DFBA, when combined with PDGF-BB. A statistically significant difference on DNA synthesis was noticed when PDGF-BB was added to PDL cells cultured with FBA. PDL cells displayed no significant increase in mitogenic activity when cultured with PDGF-BB alone. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrate the beneficial role of DFDBA, DFBA, and FBA as synergic agents with PDGF-BB to periodontal regeneration. The significant ability of the 2 decalcified bone allografts, DFDBA and DFBA, combined with PDGF to stimulate PDL cell proliferation might be a useful adjunct in the treatment of periodontal defects.     

The effect of residual calcium in decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in a critical-sized defect in the Rattus norvegicus calvarium

Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA), a widely used graft material in periodontal regenerative procedures, is processed with hydrochloric acid in the attempt to expose proteins located within the bone matrixes that are capable of inducing new bone formation. However, the degree of DFDBA demineralization varies between tissue banks, which may have an effect on clinical regeneration. This study uses the critical-sized defect (CSD) model to evaluate the wound-healing response to the residual calcium of donor bone. If the percentage of residual calcium in a graft were demonstrated to significantly enhance wound healing, then periodontal patients may benefit from further standardization of human-allograft processing. Sixty adult, male, Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (Rattus norvegicus) were randomly and equally divided into 4 test groups (ie, DFDBA at 1%, 2%, and 3% to 6% residual calcium levels and FDBA at 23% residual calcium) and a control group (no allograft). An 8-mm-diameter craniotomy was made in the rat calvarium, and polytetrafluoroethylene membranes with pore sizes of 0.50 microm were placed intracranially and ectocranially. Treatment materials were carefully placed into the CSD with a new sterilized dental amalgam carrier. Tetracycline hydrochloride was injected intraperitoneally for labeling new bone growth, and animals were euthanized 12 weeks postsurgery. As a result, histomorphometric bone fill at 12 weeks showed a statistically significant increase in the 2% DFDBA group as compared to all other groups. The authors conclude that a 2% residual calcium level in human DFDBA appears to significantly (P < or = .05) enhance osseous wound healing in the rat calvarium.     

Rat subcutaneous tissue response to macrogranular porous anorganic bovine bone graft

The ideal bone graft must present biocompatibility, osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties, resistance and plasticity. Xenogenic grafts of bovine cancellous bone origin are particularly interesting due to their biologically designed porous structure that enhance both cellular and vascular invasion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tissue response induced by bovine macrogranular porous anorganic bone implanted in rat subcutaneous tissue. Forty rats were assigned to 2 groups, as follows: the control group received empty collagen capsules and the test group received subcutaneous implants of the test material. Samples were collected after 10, 20, 30 and 60 days and processed histologically. Histological analysis showed at 10 days a granulomatous inflammatory infiltrate, rich in multinucleated giant cells and free of lymphocytes or plasma cells, similarly to mineralized allograft implanted in rat subcutaneous. In later periods, there was a significant decrease in the inflammatory infiltrate and an increase in fibrosis around graft particles. In conclusion, the test material induced a foreign body-type granuloma with subsequent fibrosis around the graft particles implanted in rat subcutaneous and did not elicit any immune response, thus being considered biocompatible.     

Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series

This study compared bone grafting regimens and different implant surfaces used for sinus augmentation and presented long-term implant success rates in augmented sinuses. Two hundred fifty-seven consecutive patients with 625 implants were evaluated retrospectively. In phase 1, 188 sinuses were grafted with (1) autograft alone; (2) autograft + demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) + absorbable hydroxyapatite (AHA) in a ratio of approximately 1:3:3; or (3) DFDBA + AHA + nonabsorbable HA (NHA) in a ratio of approximately 1:1:1. In phase 2, grafting regimen 3 (combination of DFDBA + AHA + NHA) was used in another 69 patients. Data were analyzed based on bone grafting regimen, implant surface texture, and time of implant placement (immediate or delayed). In phase 1, graft type 3 had the lowest implant failure rate (2.7%), followed by type 2 (14.3%) and type 1 (44.4%). The overall implant failure rate was 3.6%. Smooth implants showed the highest failure rate (21.8%), followed by titanium plasma-sprayed (2.9%) and HA-coated (0.7%) implants. In phase 2, the overall implant survival rate was 92.5% after 3 years. Smooth implants showed the highest failure rate (41.7%), followed by sand-blasted, large-grit, acid-etched (6.8%) and HA-coated (3.4%) implants. All failures occurred when implants were placed simultaneously with sinus grafts. This study suggests that long-term implant success can be obtained when maxillary sinuses are augmented with a combination of DFDBA + AHA + NHA. Rough surfaces and delayed implant placement seem to increase implant success in these areas.     

Histologic comparison of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized versus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft

Background: Allografts, such as demineralized freeze‐dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and mineralized freeze‐dried bone allograft (FDBA) are commonly used by clinicians for ridge preservation procedures. The primary objective of this study is to histologically evaluate and compare the healing of non‐molar extraction sockets grafted with DFDBA versus FDBA for ridge preservation. The secondary aim of this study is to compare dimensional changes in ridge height and width after grafting with these two materials. Materials: Forty patients were randomly divided into two groups of 20. Extraction sockets were filled with either FDBA or DFDBA. To minimize variables associated with the organ donor and with tissue processing, all of the graft material was procured from a single donor; the only difference in the two materials was the percentage mineralization of the final bone graft. A 2‐mm‐diameter core biopsy was taken from each grafted site ≈19 weeks after grafting. Histomorphometric analysis was performed to determine percentage of vital bone, residual graft particles, and connective tissue (CT)/other non‐bone components. Results: There were no significant differences when comparing changes in alveolar ridge dimensions of the two groups. There was no significant difference in percentage CT/other between groups. DFDBA had a significantly greater percentage of vital bone at 38.42% versus FDBA at 24.63%. The DFDBA group also had a significantly lower mean percentage of residual graft particles at 8.88% compared to FDBA at 25.42%. Conclusion: This study provides the first histologic and clinical evidence directly comparing ridge preservation with DFDBA versus FDBA in humans and demonstrates significantly greater new bone formation with DFDBA.     

Three-year analysis of Tapered Screw-Vent implants placed into extraction sockets grafted with mineralized bone allograft

With clinicians placing more dental implants, it is becoming increasingly important to maintain bone volume after tooth extraction. This article reports the results of implants placed into extraction sites grafted with particulate mineralized bone allograft (Puros). A total of 313 extraction sites were grafted with mineralized bone graft during a 36-month period. A total of 252 Tapered Screw-Vent dental implants were placed into the grafted extraction sites after a 4- to 7-month healing period. All reentries revealed a bony hard structure acceptable for osteotomy preparation. A total of 244 of these implants have been restored with fixed prosthesis and 6 with removable overdentures for a total of 250 loaded implants. A total of 6 implants failed, which required their removal (2 implants before load and 4 after loading), resulting in a 97.6% implant success rate. We conclude that mineralized human allograft placed into extraction sites is clinically useful to maintain bone volume. This material provided a bony hard structure acceptable for implant placement with good success rates.     

Experimental study of osseointegrated dental implants placed into fresh extraction sockets in dogs]

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the better way in treating bone defects around implants. METHODS: 12 mongrel dogs, pure titanium implants were immediately inserted in the mesial roots of the second, third and fourth mandibular premolar sockets. The defects around implants were separately filled with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA), demineralized freeze-dried allocancellous in combination with bBMP (bBMP compound bone) and nothing. RESULTS: Histologic observation showed that bone defects around implants were substituted by new bone in DFDBA group at 12 weeks and in bBMP compound bone group at 8 weeks, and also the osseointegration were obtained between implants and bone, but bone defects were only filled about 3/5 in no graft group at 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Immediate implants could obtain good osseointegration if the defects around implants were treated properly and the right technique was used, and also the use of bBMP compound bone could promote obviously bone formation in defects around implants.     

GBR in human extraction sockets and ridge defects prior to implant placement: clinical results and histologic evidence of osteoblastic and osteoclastic activities in DFDBA

This study evaluated new bone formation in 3 types of osseous defects following treatment with demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBA) and cell-occlusive membranes. For 8 patients electing to receive implant treatment, a distinction was made among 3 clinical situations: (1) existing alveolar ridge defects; (2) extraction sockets with lost buccal plate; and (3) extraction sockets with an intact alveolus. Implants were placed a mean of 6 months after the regenerative procedure. Clinical examination of bone width and height at the time of implant placement showed sufficient augmentation or preservation, and implants were inserted without incident. Histologic examination of hard tissue biopsies obtained from the implant sites revealed no discernible differences among the 3 types of defects. Specifically, all sites demonstrated DFDBA particles surrounded by woven or lamellar bone. No fibrous encapsulation of DFDBA or inflammatory reaction was observed. Osteoblasts were found lining marrow spaces. Howeship's lacunae, with and without resident osteoclasts, were clearly seen in several DFDBA particles; this finding supports the belief that DFDBA undergoes osteoclasis in vivo. These results demonstrate that commercially available DFDBA has osteoconductive properties that lead to appositional new bone growth in both self-contained and non-self contained osseous defects.     

Bone augmentation at titanium implants using autologous bone grafts and a bioresorbable barrier. An experimental study in the rabbit tibia.

The aim of the present investigation was to compare the effect of using autologous bone particles covered with a bioresorbable matrix barrier with the use of bone particles alone on bone augmentation at titanium implants installed in the rabbit tibia. Two Brånemark System® implants, one in each tibia, were inserted in each of 9 rabbits in such a way that 5 threads were not covered with bone. Autologous bone particles were harvested from the skull and placed over the exposed implant surfaces on each tibia. The bone graft on one tibia was covered with a Guidor® Matrix Barrier, while the bone graft on the other tibia served as a control. After a healing period of 12 weeks, the animals were sacrificed and specimens taken for histomorphometrical analyses. The analyses showed that a significantly larger volume of augmented bone tissue had formed at the test sites. There were, however, no differences in the amount of mineralized bone. In fact, the difference in tissue volume was due to an increased amount of bone marrow at the test sites. The degree of mineralized bone to implant contact as well as the degree of mineralized bone within the threads at the test implants were similar to that at the controls. In conclusion, it was found that the coverage of particulate autologous bone grafts with a bioresorbable barrier resulted in a larger volume of augmented bone than the use of bone grafts not covered with a barrier.     

Effect of bovine bone and collagen membranes on healing of mandibular bone blocks: a prospective randomized controlled study

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate if the use of deprotenized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and collagen barrier membranes (CM) in combination with mandibular bone block grafts could reduce bone block graft resorption during healing. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study has been designed. Twenty‐two ridges presenting horizontal alveolar deficiency (crest width <4 mm) and at least two adjacent missing teeth were included in the study. In the control group, one or multiple mandibular blocks were used to gain horizontal augmentation of the ridge. In the test group, DBBM granules were added at the periphery and over the graft. The reconstructions were covered by two layers of CM. Implants were placed 4 months after grafting. Direct measurements of crest width were performed before and immediately after bone augmentation, and immediately before implant placement. Results: Statistical analysis showed no significant differences in crest width between test and control groups at baseline and immediately after grafting. Mean augmentation at first surgery in the test group was 4.18 vs. 4.57 mm in the control group. Final gain obtained at the time of implant placement was 3.93 mm in the test and 3.67 mm in the control groups. The difference in mean graft resorption between test and control sites was statistically significant (0.25 mm in the test group vs. 0.89 mm in the control group, P=0.03). Complications seem to occur more often in the test group (complications recorded in three cases in the test group vs. one complication recorded in the control group). In all cases, implants could be placed in the planned sites and a total of 55 implants were placed (28 in the test group and 27 in the control group). All implants could be considered successfully integrated at the 24‐month follow‐up visit. Conclusion: The results from this study showed that the addition of bovine bone mineral and a CM around and over a mandibular bone block graft could minimize graft resorption during healing. On the other hand, the use of bone substitutes and barrier membranes in combination with block grafts increased the frequency of complications and the difficulty of their management. To cite this article:
Cordaro L, Torsello F, Morcavallo S, Mirisola di Torresanto V. Effect of bovine bone and collagen membranes on healing of mandibular bone blocks: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 1145–1150.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02093.x     

Predictability of simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla: A 9-year longitudinal experience study of 2132 implants placed into 731 human sinus grafts

PURPOSE: One-stage implant placement in the grafted maxillary sinus has traditionally been limited to patients with at least 5 mm of residual bone to ensure complete implant stabilization. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the long-term survival rates of implants with roughened surfaces placed immediately into maxillary sinus grafts in patients with 1 to 5 mm of residual bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2132 microtextured screw-type (n=1374) or hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder-type (n=758) implants were immediately placed into the grafted sinuses of 731 patients. The implants were restored and monitored for up to 9 years of clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Cumulative survival at 9 years was 97.9% (n=2091 implants); 20.4% of the implants were placed in 1 to 2 mm of residual bone. Discussion: Initial implant stability and parallelism were achieved through a combination of meticulous condensation of the particulate bone graft material around the implants, the frictional interface of the roughened implant surfaces and the host tissues, and selection of an appropriate graft material. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous implant placement into sinus floor grafts can be a predictable treatment option for patients with at least 1 to 2 mm of vertical residual bone height when careful case planning and meticulous surgical techniques are used.