Efficacy and safety of misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a meta-analysis

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol and the dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction at term.

Method: PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CNKI, EBSCO and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published in English language from 2000 to 2014, Using the keywords misoprostol, dinoprostone, labor induction.

Results: Eight of 436 studies (1669 women) identified met the criteria for meta-analysis. We assigned a quality rating to each included article. The use of misoprostol showed less oxytocin augmentation when compared with dinoprostone (RR?=?0.78, 95% CI?=?0.67–0.90). There was no difference in the risk of tachysystole (RR?=?1.18, 95% CI?=?0.78–1.79), uterine hyperstimulation (RR?=?1.24, 95% CI?=?0.75–2.06), vaginal delivery within 24?h (RR?=?1.10, 95% CI?=?1.00–1.20), cesarean delivery (RR?=?0.84, 95% CI?=?0.56–1.24), Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission (RR?=?0.86, 95% CI?=?0.58–1.28), Apgar scores <7 in 5?min (RR?=?1.18, 95% CI?=?0.39–3.63) between misoprostol and dinoprostone.

Conclusion: Misoprostol compared with dinoprostone appears to show less oxytocin augmentation for labor induction at term. The other outcomes of both drugs were similar. However, these findings were based on small-scale trials. Further studies assessing the effectiveness and safety of misoprostol and dinoprostone in selected groups of patients are warranted.     

Comparing Foley Catheter to Prostaglandins for Cervical Ripening in Multiparous Women

ObjectiveThis study sought to test the hypothesis that among multiparous women requiring cervical ripening, mechanical ripening with a Foley catheter is more effective than prostaglandin preparations.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of multiparous women with a singleton gestation who required cervical ripening in a single tertiary center from 2014 to 2019. Women who underwent cervical ripening with a Foley catheter (Foley group) were compared with women who underwent cervical ripening using a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert (PGE₂-CR group) or dinoprostone vaginal gel (PGE₂-gel group). The primary outcome was the ripening-to-delivery interval.ResultsA total of 229 women met the study criteria (Foley group: 95; PGE₂-CR group: 83; PGE₂-gel group: 51). Women in the Foley group had a significantly shorter ripening-to-delivery interval compared with women in the PGE₂-CR group (16.2 ± 9.2 hours vs. 27.0 ± 14.8 hours; P < 0.001) and were more likely to deliver within 12 hours (47.4% vs. 12.0%; P < 0.001; adjusted relative risk [aRR] 3.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07–7.26) and within 24 hours (78.9% vs. 49.4%; P < 0.001; aRR 1.61; 95% CI 1.26–2.06). Women in the Foley group were also less likely to require a second ripening method compared with women in the PGE₂-CR group (1.1% vs. 8.4%; P = 0.018; aRR 7.26; 95% CI 2.99–17.62). These differences were not observed when comparing the Foley and the PGE₂-gel groups. The cesarean section rate was similar among the Foley group (9.5%), PGE₂-CR group (9.6%; P = 0.970), and PGE₂-gel group (11.8%; P = 0.664).ConclusionIn multiparous women requiring cervical ripening, all methods of cervical ripening have a similar success rate. However, the use of a PGE₂-CR insert is associated with a considerably longer interval to delivery compared with a Foley catheter or PGE₂ gel.     

Which is the safer method of labor induction for oligohydramnios women? Transcervical double balloon catheter or dinoprostone vaginal insert

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of two cervical ripening methods in term primiparous women with unfavorable cervices and oligohydramnios.

Methods: Women (126 cases) with oligohydramnios [amniotic fluid index (AFI) ≤5?cm] and a low Bishop Score (≤6) were assigned randomly to use double balloon catheter (mechanical method group, 67 cases) or dinoprostone 10?mg controlled-release vaginal insert (pharmacological method group, 59 cases) for induction of labor. The study’s primary outcome was caesarean section rate (CSR). The secondary outcome measures included maternal and neonatal morbidity, an incremental changes in Bishop Score, and intrapartum interventions.

Results: There was no significant difference between the mechanical method group and the pharmacological method group in CSR and change in Bishop Score. Tacysystole, non-reassuring fetal heart patterns, and cases of newborn umbilical-cord arterial blood pH<7.1 were significantly lower with the mechanical method compared with the pharmacological method (p?<?0.05). More patients needed additional intervention in the mechanical method group.

Conclusions: Both methods resulted in a similar CSR. Double balloon catheter resulted in fewer labor complications, but more frequent use of oxytocin and amniotomy. Compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert, double balloon catheter use may be less problematic in women with oligohydramnios.     

Pre-induction of labour: comparing dinoprostone vaginal insert to repeated prostaglandin administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of the dinoprostone vaginal insert compared to repeated prostaglandin administration (including dinoprostone and misoprostol) in women at term. Methods: Electronic databases and additional handsearching were used to identify randomized controlled trial (RCT). We included studies reporting data separately for nulliparous and/or multiparous in women with unfavourable cervix (Bishop <5) and intact membranes. The primary efficacy outcome was caesarean section (CS) rate. Primary safety outcome was uterine hyperstimulation requiring immediate delivery. Results: Eighteen RCTs were eligible and seven studies were included (totally 911 patients). The dinoprostone vaginal insert reduces CS rate in nulliparous women of 24% compared to the other ways of administration (RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.59, 0.98). The risk of oxytocin use is reduced with the use of vaginal insert (RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.42, 0.99). The risk of hyperstimulation is statistically higher in nulliparous women using vaginal insert than the other ways of administration with RR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.08,4.33. Conclusions: In nulliparous women with unprepared cervix and intact membranes vaginal insert perform better than repeated vaginal doses since it is associated with more vaginal deliveries and less oxytocin use. Although vaginal insert is associated with more uterine hyperstimulation, it shows a protective effect toward caesarean section.     

Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis

Objective: To compare dinoprostone 10 mg controlled-release vaginal insert with other forms of vaginal or cervical prostaglandin for cervical ripening.Data Sources: Literature search strategy included review of the Cochrane database of randomized trials, on-line searching of MEDLINE, hand searching of bibliographies, and contact with authors of relevant reports.Methods of Study Selection: Randomized trials were included if they compared a dinoprostone slow-release vaginal insert with an alternative vaginal or cervical prostaglandin for cervical ripening and labor induction in women at term with singleton gestations. Primary end points were delivery by 24 hours postinsertion, uterine hypertonus with fetal heart change, and cesarean delivery rate. Study inclusion, validity assessment, and data extraction were carried out independently by two reviewers, and cross-checked for consistency. Data were combined when appropriate, using the Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effects method. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using chi-square statistics.Tabulation, Integration, and Results: Nine relevant trials were identified, seven comparing the dinoprostone 10 mg vaginal insert with dinoprostone gel and two with misoprostol. Five trials reported adequate methods for randomization concealment. None were double blind. The likelihood of delivery by 24 hours was similar with the vaginal insert and alternatives: common odds ratio (OR) 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56, 1.15). Uterine hypertonus with change in fetal heart and cesarean delivery rate were also similar: common OR 1.19 (95% CI 0.56, 2.54) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.56, 1.08), respectively. The secondary end points of mean time to delivery and delivery by 12 hours appeared to favor misoprostol-dinoprostone gel. However, data for these end points were heterogeneous and their combination is therefore of limited value and potentially misleading.Conclusion: No clinically significant differences were identified between the vaginal insert and alternatives used for cervical ripening at term.     

Cervical ripening: A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to compare the efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter/intravaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening. STUDY DESIGN: Patients admitted for induction of labor were randomized to receive intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 4 hours or intracervical Foley catheter/intravaginal dinoprostone 4 mg every 4 hours. Patients not entering active labor and having ruptured membranes or arrest of dilatation received intravenous oxytocin. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients received Foley catheter/dinoprostone gel and 62 patients received misoprostol. The mean time until cervical ripening was less in the catheter/gel group (7.5 ± 3.4 vs 12.0 ± 5.9 hours, p < 0.01). The mean time until vaginal delivery was less in the catheter/gel group (17.4 ± 6.9 vs 21.2 ± 7.5 hours, p = 0.004). Among vaginal deliveries, more patients in the catheter/gel group delivered within 24 hours (90% vs 69%, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Intracervical Foley catheter/intravaginal dinoprostone was associated with more rapid cervical ripening, shorter induction to vaginal delivery interval, and greater number of vaginal deliveries within 24 hours. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:1333-40.)     

Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin on labor induction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective: It is unclear that whether Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin could improve the efficacy of induction outcome.

Method: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies to evaluate the effect of Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin on labor induction. PubMed, Embase, and other databases were searched from their inception to July 2017. We included all RCTs comparing Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin (i.e. intervention group) with Foley catheter followed by oxytocin (i.e. control group) in the three kinds of women (nulliparas and multiparas/only nulliparas/only multiparas). We estimate summarized relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes, standard mean difference for continuous outcomes. Fixed- and random-effects models were used, depending on heterogeneity.

Results: After application of our inclusion and exclusion criteria, six RCTs with a total of 1133 participants were identified. We found that only nulliparas had significant RR of delivery within 24?h (RR?=?1.32, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.55, I²?=?46.5%). Meanwhile, there was no statistically significant difference between intervention and control groups in vaginal delivery in 24?h, cesarean delivery, time to delivery, and Apgar score at 5?min less than 7. Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin did not increase the risk of side effects, included chorioamnionitis, postpartum hemorrhage, uterine hyperstimulation, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

Conclusion: The results seem to support the use of oxytocin to a Foley catheter at the initiation of labor induction, as it might lead to increases the rate of delivery within 24?h in nulliparas.     

A META-ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED-RELEASE PROSTAGLANDIN FOR CERVICAL RIPENING AND LABOUR INDUCTION

OBJECTIVES: to examine the effectiveness and safety of controlled-release prostaglandin for cervical ripening. DATA SOURCES: we conducted a computerized search of Medline using the keywords "Cervidil"; or "Propess"; or "prostaglandin/dinoprostone" and "pessary"; or "prostaglandin/dinoprostone" and "controlled" and "release"; or "prostaglandin/dinoprostone" and "vaginal" and "insert"; identifying studies in the English literature published between January 1980 and December 1999. STUDY SELECTION: we included all randomized trials that compared controlled-release vaginal prostaglandin with a retrieval string with any other method of cervical ripening or with a placebo. Nine studies were identified.TABULATION, INTERACTION, AND RESULTS: the two coauthors independently abstracted the data and evaluated the studies for methodologic quality, blinded to each other's results. Homogeneity of results was evaluated, and if present, the summary odds ratio and 95 percent confidence intervals were determined. Compared with placebo, controlled-release prostaglandin resulted in cervical change (summary odds ratio [OR] = 3.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.71-5.86), a higher rate of vaginal delivery in 12 hours (OR = 29.01, 95% CI = 7.08-118.87), less need for oxytocin (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.06-0.32), but a higher incidence of excessive uterine activity (P<0.0001) and hyperstimulation (P = 0.004). When compared with Prepidil, there was a higher rate of excessive uterine activity with controlled-release prostaglandin (P = 0.03), but less need for oxytocin (OR = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.01-0.53). When compared with Prepidil/immediate oxytocin, there was a lower rate of active labour in 12 hours with controlled-release prostaglandin (OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.10-0.72). There was a lower rate of vaginal delivery in 12 hours and higher incidence of oxytocin use with controlled-release prostaglandin as compared with misoprostol (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.34-0.83 and OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.08-2.32 respectively). The induction to delivery interval was shorter with controlled-release prostaglandin than with placebo or Prepidil, but longer than with Prepidil/immediate oxytocin, or misoprostol. Although no differences were seen with maternal morbidity (such as Caesarean delivery) or neonatal outcomes, the sample size was not adequate to evaluate these outcomes. CONCLUSION: controlled-release prostaglandin appears to be an effective cervical ripening agent as compared with Prepidil, but may result in an increased incidence of excessive uterine activity. Controlled-release prostaglandin may not be as effective as misoprostol or Prepidil/immediate oxytocin. Further randomized trials with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate maternal morbidity and neonatal outcomes.     

Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations

OBJECTIVE: To determine the better performer among cervical ripening agents for the elective induction of labor. STUDY DESIGN: An open-label, randomized study was done in consecutive patients undergoing elective induction of labor at the 41st week and beyond. Inclusion criteria were: singleton pregnancy, gestational age ascertained through first-trimester ultrasound, Bishop score <4 and nulliparity. Exclusion criteria were: oligohydramnios, maternal/fetal disorder or pregnancy complication, previous uterine surgery, rupture of membranes and presence of uterine activity. Patients received either slow-release dinoprostone vaginal insert (VI) or 0.5-mg dinoprostone intracervical (IC) gel, twice, 6 hours apart. RESULTS: Women receiving VI showed increased risk of entering labor without further stimulation (OR = 6.48, 95% CI 2.06-21.67, p < 0.001) and delivering vaginally within 24 hours (OR = 2.71, 95% CI 1.19-6.21, p = 0.01) in comparison to those receiving IC gel. A stay in the hospital (> 4 days) was more prevalent in women treated with IC gel in comparison to those treated with VI (OR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.04-5.37). CONCLUSION: Preinduction cervical ripening with the dinoprostone slow-release vaginal insert is associated with a hight rate of women undergoing vaginal delivery within 24 hours, with a shorter stay. Considering its good performance, the dinoprostone slow-release vaginal insert is the first choice for elective induction of labor in postdate pregnancy.     

Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone cervical gel for cervical ripening and labour induction. Methods We carried out an experimental clinical trial in which we enrolled 130 cervical consecutive patients with cervical ripening, randomly assigned to one of the following two treatment groups: (1) intravaginal misoprostol and (2) intracervical dinoprostone gel. A total of 50 μm of misoprostol was placed in the posterior vaginal fornix every 6 h for a maximum period of 24 h and 0.5 mg of dinoprostone was administrated in the uterine cervix every 6 h, for a maximum period of 24 h. The primary outcome measure was the number (rate) of women who went to vaginally deliver within 24 h of the protocol initiation. Results Among 130 patients evaluated, 65 were allocated to the misoprostol group and 65 to the dinoprostone group. The proportion of vaginal delivery within 24 h was significantly higher in the misoprostol group (75%) than in the dinoprostone group (53.8%) (RR = 1.40, 95% CI [1.07–1.45], P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the mean time interval of delivery in the misoprostol group and the dinoprostone group (14.9 vs.15.8 h) (P = 0.51). The Bishop score was significantly higher in the misoprostol group, 6 h after the onset of the study (1.38; relative risk, 95% CI [1.02–1.85], P = 0.03). The Caesarean delivery rate for fetal distress was higher in the dinoprostone group (21 vs. 10.8%, P = 0.15). The tachysystole (Misoprostol 6.1% vs. dinoprostone 4.6%, relative risk 1.15, 95% CI [0.6–2.24]) and hyperstimulation syndrome rates (Misoprostol 7.6% vs. dinoprostone 4.6%, relative risk 1.26, 95% CI [0.72–2.24]) were slightly increased in the misoprostol group than in the dinoprostone group without reaching the level of statistical signification. Conclusion Misoprostol as used in this protocol is more effective than cervical dinoprostone gel application in the cervical ripening and labour induction. There is a tendency for an increase in the rate of tachysystole and hyperstimulation syndrome.     

Does Cervical Ripening at Term Using a High Volume Foley Catheter Result in a Lower Caesarean Section Rate Than a Low Volume Foley Catheter? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter before induction of labour is a common obstetrical intervention. In this study we aimed to evaluate primarily the relationship between high or low volume Foley catheters used for cervical ripening and Caesarean section, and secondarily the relationship between Foley catheter volume, cervical ripeness, and time to delivery. We searched Medline and Embase from their inceptions with the assistance of an experienced librarian. All abstracts and complete articles were independently reviewed by two reviewers, according to predefined inclusion criteria. Six hundred forty-eight abstracts were identified, and 30 complete articles were read in full. Three articles with a total of 575 participating women met the inclusion criteria. The rate of Caesarean section with use of 80 mL Foley catheters was not significantly different from the rate using 30 mL Foley catheters (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.41). A favourable cervix (which was defined heterogeneously) was more common with high volume catheters (RR 1.72; 95% CI 1.46 to 2.04), and failure to deliver in 24 hours was lower (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.90). High volume Foley catheters improve the likelihood of a favourable cervix and chance of delivery in 24 hours more than low volume Foley catheters. As a more favourable cervix before induction of labour is associated with a lower rate of Caesarean section, a randomized controlled trial comparing high and low volume Foley catheters for cervical ripening using Caesarean section as the primary outcome is warranted.     

Comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate for labor induction

Objective(S): To compare the effectiveness and safety of intra-cervical Foley catheter combined with intra-vaginal isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) versus intra-vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in pregnant women with unripe cervices.

Methods: Open-labeled randomized controlled trial in Cairo university hospital, Cairo, Egypt during 2012–2014. Three hundred and ninety-five pregnant women at term or post-term with an indication for labor induction and unripe cervix were included in the study. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups. Vaginal misoprostol was used in group 1 (n?=?197) and intra-cervical Foley catheter plus vaginal IMN in group 2 (n?=?198). Our main outcome measure was cesarean section rate.

Results: Among the 395 included patients there were significantly lower duration of induction of labor (p?<?0.001) in group 1with lower cesarean section rates [22.8% in group 1versus 33.3% in group 2; RR 0.7 (0.6–0.9), (p?=?0.020)]. Whereas the uterine hyperstimulation (p?<?0.001) was significantly higher in group 1. There were no significant differences between both groups as regard patients’ demographic characteristics.

Conclusions(s): Vaginal misoprostol is more effective but less safe than Foley catheter combined with vaginal IMN for induction of labor in term and post-term pregnancy.     

可控释地诺前列酮栓与米索前列醇及Foley尿管用于足月妊娠促宫颈成熟及引产的效果及安全性比较

Objective?To explore the effects and safety of controlled-release dinoprostone suppositories, misoprostol and Foley catheters for full-term pregnancy in promoting cervical ripening and induce labor. Methods?86 full-term pregnant primiparas with cervical Bishop score<6 and indications for labor induction were prospectively selected and admitted between May 2020 and August 2021. They were divided into 3 groups according to the internal sampling method, 29 cases as group A were treated with controlled-release dinoprostone suppositories, 27 cases as group B were treated with misoprostol, and 30 cases as group C were treated with Foley catheters. The treatment effects and safety of the three groups were compared. Results?The time from induction to labor and the time from labor induction to delivery in group A and C were shorter than those in group B (P＜0.05), and the success rate of induction was higher than that in group B (P＜0.05). The cervical Bishop scores after administration of 4 h, 12 h and 24 h were all higher than group B (P＜0.05). Conclusion?Compared with misoprostol, the controlled-release dinoprostone suppository and Foley catheter are more suitable for full-term pregnancy induction, which can promote cervical ripening and increase the success rate of labor induction.     

Pregnancy outcomes after failed cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 followed by Foley balloon catheter

Objective: To study pregnancy outcomes of cervical ripening with Foley catheter, in women who failed to respond to prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all patients with a singleton pregnancy, who underwent cervical ripening with vaginal PGE2, between 2013 and 2014, was performed. Patients who failed to respond to a total dose of 6–9 mg PGE2, defined as no change in Bishop score, underwent subsequent ripening with Foley catheter (non-responders group). Data were compared to patients who achieved sufficient response to a total dose of up to 9 mg PGE2 (responders group).

Results: Compared with the responders group (n?=?813), patients in the non-responders group (n?=?49) had higher rates of nulliparity (p?<?0.001), pre-induction cervical dilation ≤1?cm (p?=?0.004), pre-induction cervical effacement?≤50% (p?=?0.01) and birth weight >4000?g (p?=?0.02). A significantly higher cesarean delivery rate was observed in the non-responders group (51 versus 12.3%, p?<?0.001). Failed ripening with PGE2 was found to be independently associated with cesarean delivery (aOR?=?5.11, 95% CI?=?2.72–9.62).

Conclusions: The need for an additional cervical ripening method after failure with PGE2 is associated with a very high risk of cesarean delivery. This is particularly significant in nulliparous women, women carrying large fetuses, and women presenting with a low Bishop score.     

Comparison of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial

Objective: To compare the efficacy of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion and the Cook cervical ripening balloon. Methods: Women at term with a singleton pregnancy who presented for labor induction were randomly assigned to the Foley catheter or the Cook cervical ripening balloon (costs $3 and $41, respectively). The main outcome measures included time from device insertion to delivery, rates of successful vaginal delivery and occurrence of adverse events. Results: The study was completed by 188 women. Time from balloon insertion to expulsion and from insertion to delivery was significantly shorter in the Foley catheter group when compared with the Cook cervical ripening balloon group (6.9 ± 4.2 vs. 10.1 ± 4.7 hours, p = .001 and 19.6 ± 11.4 vs. 23.4 ± 15.5 hours, p = .03, respectively). There were no significant differences in other outcomes. Conclusions: Considering its shorter induction process and lower cost, Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion is superior to the Cook cervical ripening balloon for initiating cervical ripening.     

Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management

BACKGROUND: Misoprostol fails to induce labour in 5-20% of women at term. AIM: To analyse possible predictors of unsuccessful induction with 50 microg vaginal misoprostol and effectiveness and the safety of intracervical Foley catheter application in induction failures. METHODS: An observational study was conducted on 1030 women with singleton, live fetuses, vertex presentation, > 34 weeks of gestation and Bishop score < 5. Induction of labour with 50 microg vaginal misoprostol repeated every 6 h was attempted. Women without regular uterine contractions and cervical changes at the end of 24 h were considered to be unsuccessful, and a transcervical Foley balloon catheter was placed and inflated with 50 mL saline. Possible predictors of induction failures were analysed via logistic regression analysis. Neonatal outcomes and vaginal delivery achieved after Foley catheter were also determined. RESULTS: Induction was successful in 918 cases (89.1%) and Foley catheter was placed in 112 (10.8%) women. Increasing gestational age in weeks (odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.88) and increasing Bishop score (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.90) decreased the risk of failed induction. Failure rates were 16% (27/169) in post-term nulliparous women with Bishop score 相似文献   

Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether the rate of uterine rupture in patients with a previous cesarean delivery is related to labor induction and/or cervical ripening using transcervical Foley catheter. METHODS: Charts of all patients who had a trial of labor after a previous cesarean delivery in our institution between 1988 and 2002 were reviewed. The rates of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and uterine rupture in patients with spontaneous labor (control group) were compared with those of patients who underwent a labor induction by means of amniotomy with or without oxytocin and patients who underwent a labor induction/cervical ripening using a transcervical Foley catheter. Logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS: Of 2479 patients, 1807 had a spontaneous labor, 417 had labor induced by amniotomy with or without oxytocin, and 255 had labor induced by using transcervical Foley catheter. The rate of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery was significantly different among the groups (78.0% versus 77.9% versus 55.7%, P <.001), but not the rate of uterine rupture (1.1% versus 1.2% versus 1.6%, P =.81). After adjusting for confounding variables, the odds ratio (OR) for successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41, 1.15), and the OR for uterine rupture was 0.47 (95% CI 0.06, 3.59) in patients who underwent an induction of labor using a transcervical Foley catheter when compared with patients with spontaneous labor. CONCLUSION: Labor induction using a transcervical Foley catheter was not associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture.     

Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether adding oxytocin to transcervical Foley catheter preinduction cervical ripening improves induction success. METHODS: This trial enrolled 200 women with singleton pregnancies presenting for preinduction ripening. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Foley catheter alone (control) or Foley catheter plus low-dose oxytocin (treatment). Providers were not blinded to use of oxytocin, and labor was managed according to routine obstetric protocols. This study was powered to detect a 20% difference in the proportion of patients delivered within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were related to vaginal delivery rate, duration of induction, complications, and pain management. RESULTS: Results were available for 183 (92 treatment, 91 control) of 200 patients randomly assigned. There were no differences in proportions of deliveries-overall (65% compared with 60%; relative risk [RR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.35, number needed to treat 21) or vaginal (48% compared with 46%; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.76-1.41, number needed to treat 60)-in 24 hours, or cesarean deliveries or times to deliveries between treatment or control groups. Rates of complications were comparable; however, the treatment group had a higher proportion of regional analgesia requirement during induction than controls (23% compared with 9%, P=.01; RR 2.60, 95% CI 1.21-5.56). CONCLUSION: Addition of oxytocin to transcervical Foley catheter does not shorten the time to delivery and has no effect on the likelihood of delivery within 24 hours or vaginal delivery rate, although there is an increased use of analgesia by these patients during ripening. The use of oxytocin in addition to Foley catheter ripening is not justified. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00468520. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.     

A randomized comparison of extra-amniotic saline infusion and intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening

Objective: To compare extra-amniotic saline infusion to intracervical dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening.Methods: Women with Bishop scores less than 5 were assigned randomly to either extra-amniotic saline infusion (n = 26) or intracervical dinoprostone gel (n = 26) for preinduction cervical ripening. A sample size of 50 would have 80% power to detect a 10-hour difference in the mean time from start of cervical ripening to delivery for the two methods of intervention, with a type I error of .05.Results: The study populations were similar in age, gestational age, and initial Bishop score. They differed in parity, with 22 nulliparas in the extra-amniotic saline infusion group versus 13 in the dinoprostone gel group (relative risk [RR] 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11, 2.57). The number of women achieving a favorable Bishop score at 6 hours was greater with extra-amniotic saline infusion (n = 20) than dinoprostone gel (n = 9) (RR 2.14, 95% CI 1.22, 3.75). Mean time from start of ripening to delivery was 25.9 hours with extra-amniotic saline infusion and 30.2 hours with dinoprostone gel (P = .25). Birth weight, Apgar scores, umbilical artery pH, and infectious morbidity were similar between groups.Conclusion: More women achieved a favorable Bishop score at 6 and 12 hours after the start of cervical ripening with extra-amniotic saline infusion compared with dinoprostone gel. Saline infusion is as safe as dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening.     

Suction curettage as first line treatment in cases with cesarean scar pregnancy: feasibility and effectiveness in early pregnancy

Objective: A cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is an extremely rare form of an ectopic pregnancy, which is defined as the localization of a fertilized ovum surrounded by uterine muscular fiber and scar tissue. The objective of this study was to discuss the management options for CSPs in a singleton center. In the current study, we discussed the current management options for CSPs based on our 6 years of experience.

Material and methods: A retrospective evaluation of diagnosed and treated 26 patients with CSPs in Istanbul Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital during a 6-year period was discussed. Suction curettage was performed as first-line treatment in patients with a gestation <8 weeks and myometrial thickness >2?mm.

Results: Twenty-two (84.6%) patients with CSPs were initially treated surgically (curettage and hysterotomy) and four (15.4%) patients were treated medically with methotrexate injections. Vacuum aspiration was performed in 19 patients as a first-line treatment, six of them needed an additional Foley balloon catheter to be inserted for tamponade because of persistent vaginal bleeding. Suction curettage was successful in 12 patients. The treatment rate for suction curettage with or without Foley balloon catheter tamponade was 16 of 19 (84.2%).

Conclusion: The early diagnosis of a CSP (7–8 weeks gestation) with a β-hCG level <17.000?mIU/ml and a myometrial thickness >2?mm can be treated with suction curettage with or without placement of a uterine Foley balloon as curative treatment.