共查询到6条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
目的:探索重性精神障碍住院患者团体治疗的效果,分析疗效的相关因素,为住院患者的团体治疗提供理论与实践上的参考.方法:选取10名住院患者,(精神分裂症,心境障碍各5例)参加连续6次的支持性团体治疗(其中1例完成了4次治疗).治疗结束后进行个案深度访谈,并采用扎根理论对访谈资料进行编码分析.结果:住院患者团体治疗的疗效包括:认知观念提升、社会功能改善、症状改善、专业知识学习、愿意参加后续团体5个方面;住院患者团体治疗的疗效相关因素包括:团体过程、成员自身、领导者、其他因素4个方面.结论:本研究提示,对于住院患者来说,团体治疗是有效的,但影响团体治疗效果的因素比较广泛,需要综合考虑. 相似文献
3.
4.
J L Wallander 《Journal of pediatric psychology》1992,17(5):521-535
Introduces a Special Issue, covering two published issues (5 and 6) of this journal, on theory-driven research in pediatric psychology. A rationale for conducting research from a conceptual basis is presented. It is emphasized that science is primarily an intellectual activity, demonstrated in the form of theory building, testing, and reformulation. Furthermore, it is argued theory serves as a planning and communication aide for scientific pursuit. The process and components of theory-driven research are then highlighted. Theoretical constructs, theoretical and empirical definitions of constructs, and the use of variables are discussed. A definition of scientific theory is offered. Theory testing is distinguished from post hoc theorizing. Differences in the scope of theories are noted. Connections between theory and hypothesis testing and research design are addressed, especially for nonexperimental or correlational research. 相似文献
5.
Background
Balint groups (BGs) are a means of enhancing competence in the physician–patient relationship and are also regarded as beneficial for GPs'' mental health. However, voluntary BGs are still few, some members terminate their participation, and problems are reported in obligatory groups in residency programmes. This raises questions about possible negative aspects of BGs.Aim
To examine difficulties in BGs as experienced by BG leaders.Design of study
Qualitative study using interviews.Setting
Eight BG leaders from five countries were interviewed.Method
The interviews focused on the informants'' experiences of difficulties in their groups and were analysed with a systematic text-condensation method.Results
Three categories of difficulties emerged from the analysis: 1) the individual physician having needs, vulnerabilities, and defences; 2) the group (including the leader) having problems of hidden agendas, rivalries, and frames; and 3) the surrounding environment defining the conditions of the group. BGs were found to fit into modern theories of small groups as complex systems. They are submitted to group dynamics that are sometimes malicious, and are exposed to often tough environmental conditions.Conclusion
Professionally conducted BGs seem to be a gentle, efficient method to train physicians, but with limitations. Participation of a member demands psychological stability and an open mind. BGs need support from the leadership of healthcare organisations in order to exist. 相似文献6.
Natalia Piana Aldo Maldonato Donatella Bloise Luciano Carboni Giovanni Careddu Emanuele Fraticelli Luisa Mereu Giannermete Romani 《Patient education and counseling》2010