Aortic diameter at age 65 in men with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

Objectives. Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been linked to a decreased risk for abdominal aortic aneurysm (aortic diameter ≥30?mm, AAA) development in men. The aim of this study was to evaluate if such an effect is detectable already around the time of diabetes diagnosis. Design. We cross-sectionally compared aortic diameter at ultrasound screening for AAA in 691 men aged 65 years with incipient or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (group A) with 18,262 65-year old control men without diabetes (group B). Results. Aortic diameter did not differ between groups (18.8[17.4–20.8] vs. 19.0[17.5–28.7] mm; p?=?0.43). AAA prevalence was 2.5% in group A and 1.5% in group B (p?=?.010). In logistic regression taking group differences in body mass index (BMI), smoking, presence of atherosclerotic disease and hypertension into account, the difference in AAA prevalence was no longer significant (p?=?.15). Among men in group A, C-peptide (r?=?.093; p?=?.034), but not HbA1c (r?=?.060; p?=?.24) correlated with aortic diameter. Conclusion. Among 65 year old men aortic diameter and AAA prevalence do not differ between those with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and those without diabetes. Putative protective effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus against aortic dilatation and AAA development therefore probably occur later after diagnosis of diabetes.     

Ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a selected group of men over the age of 60, and define main risk factors. DESIGN--Population based screening study. SETTING--Private Norwegian health maintenance organisation. SUBJECTS--500 men over the age of 60 years. INTERVENTIONS--General examination by a general practitioner, together with measurements of blood glucose and serum cholesterol concentrations. Abdominal scan with a B-mode ultrasound imager. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--An increase in the diameter of the aorta of more than 150% over the diameter at the origin of the superior mesenteric artery, or maximum diameter of more than 29 mm. Correlation with history of smoking, serum cholesterol concentration, and general health. RESULTS--29 patients (5.8%) had small, and 12 (2.4%) had large, abdominal aortic aneurysms. There was a significant association between aortic aneurysm and history of smoking (p < 0.01), poor health (defined as coexistent hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes mellitus) (p < 0.01), and increasing age (p = 0.025). There was no association with hypercholesterolaemia. CONCLUSION--Ultrasonic screening of groups at risk followed by elective operation may reduce mortality of abdominal aortic aneurysm.     

A single normal ultrasonographic scan at age 65 years rules out significant aneurysm disease for life in men.

BACKGROUND: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has been carried out in Gloucestershire since 1990. All men in the county are offered aortic ultrasonography in their 65th year. Men with an aortic diameter of less than 26 mm are considered 'normal' and no follow-up is arranged. The aim of this study was to ascertain if men with 'normal' aortic diameters at age 65 years ever develop a clinically significant aneurysm. METHODS: A cohort study was performed on 223 65-year-old men who had an aorta of less than 26 mm in diameter in 1988. These men had repeat ultrasonography in 1993 and 2000. The causes of death in men who died during this interval were investigated. RESULTS: Eight men were lost to follow-up. As far as it was possible to ascertain, none of the 86 men who died over the 12-year interval did so from ruptured AAA. There was no clinically significant increase in mean aortic diameter in the remaining 129 men who had three serial ultrasonographic scans over the 12-year interval. CONCLUSION: A single, 'normal' ultrasound scan at age 65 years effectively rules out the risk of clinically significant aneurysm disease for life in men.     

Negative association between infra-renal aortic diameter and glycaemia: the Health in Men Study.

OBJECTIVE: There is evidence of a negative association between diabetes and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aim of this study was to assess whether there is a similar relationship between both diabetes and glucose level, and infra-renal aortic diameter throughout its range. DESIGN AND METHODS: Infra-renal aortic diameter was measured using ultrasound in 12,203 men aged 65-83 years as part of a trial of screening for AAA. A range of cardiovascular risk factors were also assessed. In a follow-up study, fasting serum glucose was measured in 2,859 non-diabetic men. Aortic diameter was logarithmically transformed and treated as both a continuous and categorical variable in stepwise multivariate linear and logistic models. RESULTS: The median aortic diameter was slightly smaller in the diabetic men (21.3+/-3.9 vs 21.6+/-3.8, P<0.0001). There was an independent negative association between diabetes and AAA (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63,0.98), and an inverse correlation (Coefficient: -0.0064, p=0.0024) between fasting glucose and aortic diameter in non-diabetic men. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes is inversely associated with both AAA and aortic diameter in men over 65 years. This association is independent of other risk factors for AAA. Aortic diameter also has an inverse relationship with fasting glucose concentrations in men without diabetes.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program in Poland

Background

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is currently recommended by several vascular societies. In countries where it has been introduced the prevalence of AAAs differed greatly and was mainly related to cigarette smoking. The screening program also had an enormous impact on the decrease of AAA ruptures and reduced mortality rate. These facts have led to the introduction of the first screening program for AAAs in Poland.

Objective

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of AAAs among men aged 60 years and older undergoing ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta.

Material and methods

A single ultrasonography of the abdomen was performed to assess the aorta from the renal arteries to the bifurcation and the diameter of the aorta was measured at its widest point. The cut-off value for determining an aortic aneurysm was set at a diameter of ≥?30 mm. All ultrasonography measurements were performed by physicians in outpatient departments throughout the Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province. Additionally, each subject had to fill out a questionnaire with demographic data, smoking habits, existing comorbidities and familial occurrence of AAAs. The study was conducted from October 2009 to November 2011.

Results

The abdominal aorta ultrasound examinations were carried out in 1556 men aged 60 years and older. The prevalence of AAA in the study population was 6.0?% (94 out of 1556). The average age of the men was 69 years (SD 6 years, range 60–92 years). In the study population 55?% of the men smoked or had smoked and 3?% were aware of the presence of AAAs in family members. There were three risk factors significantly associated with the presence of AAAs: age (p?Conclusion The prevalence of AAAs among men in Poland is higher than in other European countries and the USA. The screening program for AAAs is an easy and reliable method for detecting early stages of the disease and risk factors which are the driving forces for the development of AAAs.     

The natural history of abdominal aortic aneurysms and their risk of rupture

The UK Small Aneurysm Trial has shown that ultrasound surveillance is a safe management option for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (4.0 to 5.5 cm in diameter), with an annual rupture rate of only 1%. We investigated baseline risk factors associated with aneurysm rupture in the 1090 trial patients and an additional 1167 patients enrolled in the UK Small Aneurysm Study. In this cohort of 2257 patients there were 103 cases of aneurysm rupture. After 3 years the annual rate of rupture was 2.2% (95% CI 1.7 to 2.8). The risk of rupture was independently and significantly associated with female sex (p < 0.001), larger initial aneurysm diameter (p < 0.001), current smoking (p = 0.01) and higher mean blood pressure (p = 0.01). Age, body mass index, serum cholesterol concentration and ankle/brachial pressure index were not associated with an increased risk of aneurysm rupture. The most surprising finding was that women had a 3-fold higher risk of aneurysm rupture than men. Effective control of blood pressure and cessation of smoking are two simple measures that are likely to diminish the risk of aneurysm rupture and improve the cardiovascular health of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.     

Carotid Atherosclerosis and Relation to Growth of Infrarenal Aortic Diameter and Follow-up Diameter: The Tromsø Study

ObjectivesThis research aims to study how carotid atherosclerosis is related to growth of infrarenal aortic diameter and aneurysmal formation.DesignPopulation-based follow-up study.Materials and methodsAt baseline, ultrasound examination of the carotid artery and the abdominal aorta was performed in 4241 persons from a general population with no evidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The burden of atherosclerosis was assessed as carotid total plaque area (TPA). After a mean follow-up of 6.3 years, a new ultrasound examination was performed and measurements of the aortic diameter and carotid TPA were repeated. The effects on aortic diameter progression, follow-up diameter and risk for AAA were assessed in multiple linear and logistic regression models according to carotid TPA, adjusted for known risk factors.ResultsWhen analysing AAA as a dichotomous variable, a borderline association between atherosclerosis and AAA could be demonstrated. When modelling aortic diameter as a continuous variable, a 1-SD increase in 5 years' carotid plaque area (ΔTPA) was associated with a 0.12-mm growth in infrarenal aortic diameter (standard error (SE) 0.04) and a 0.20-mm wider aorta at follow-up (SE 0.06). No independent relation was seen for baseline atherosclerosis.ConclusionsCarotid plaque progression was positively related to growth in infrarenal aortic diameter and aortic diameter at follow-up. Whether this co-variation between plaque growth and aortic diameter growth is causally related or independent events is still an open question.     

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a hypertensive population.

Two studies were undertaken to estimate the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a hypertensive population. The initial study screened hypertensive people from three local general practices. In this study 918 patients underwent ultrasound scanning of the abdominal aorta (498 men and 420 women). A total of 24 abdominal aortic aneurysms were identified; 20 in men (4%) and four in women (0.9%). Of these, 11 were > 4 cm in transverse diameter. Following this study, only hypertensive men over the age of 60 years and women over the age of 65 years were screened from a total of 29 general practices. Regular scanning sessions were held at each practice and 1328 patients attended (744 men and 584 women). A total of 43 abdominal aortic aneurysms were detected; 39 in men (5.2%) and four in women (0.7%). Hypertensive men are at increased risk of developing abdominal aortic aneurysms and should be offered an initial ultrasound scan at 60 years of age. Female hypertensives yield a much lower detection rate and screening hypertensive females would probably be an inappropriate use of available resources.     

Ultrasound screening of first-degree relatives of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm

The pedigrees were constructed of 43 patients (probands) who underwent resection of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Seven probands (16.2%) had a first-degree relative (parent, sibling, child) known to have had an abdominal aortic aneurysm (multiplex family). To determine the prevalence of undiagnosed abdominal aortic aneurysm, ultrasound screening of first-degree relatives over age 40 years was undertaken. Of 202 eligible relatives, 103 (51.0%) were screened. An occult abdominal aortic aneurysm was defined as an infrarenal aortic diameter greater than 3.0 cm or an infrarenal/suprarenal aortic diameter ratio of greater than 1.5. An incipient abdominal aortic aneurysm was defined as a clear focal bulge of the infrarenal aorta, which was less than 3.0 cm in greatest diameter. Four of 103 relatives (3.9%) were found to have an occult abdominal aortic aneurysm (age/sex: 57M, 60M, 62F, 65M), and three (2.9%) were found with an incipient abdominal aortic aneurysm (age/sex: 56M, 60M, 67F). These smaller abdominal aortic aneurysms were in patients younger than the operated probands (average age men, 67 years; women, 69 years). Six of seven individuals were in families previously considered simplex, increasing the actual multiplex family frequency from 16.2% to 27.9%. All seven new abdominal aortic aneurysms were found in the 49 siblings age 55 years or older. There were no abdominal aortic aneurysms found in the 39 relatives under age 55 years, in 14 children ages 50 to 59 years or in one parent. Therefore of the siblings age 55 years or older, 5/20 men (25.0%) and 2/29 women (6.9%) were found to have a previously undiagnosed abdominal aortic aneurysm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Axial computed tomography and duplex scanning for the determination of maximal abdominal aortic diameter in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms

Summary BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess differences between axial computed tomography and duplex ultrasound, based on measurements of maximal aortic diameter in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS: From January 2002 until December 2004, 322 patients were admitted with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. All of them underwent abdominal duplex ultrasound scanning and computed tomography by separate laboratories in order to determine the maximal aortic diameter. The computed tomography technologists were blinded to all duplex results and vice versa. RESULTS: Mean computed tomography maximal aortic diameter was 56.17 mm and mean duplex maximal aortic diameter was 53.44 mm. Computed tomography measurements were greater than duplex in 97.83% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Axial computed tomography consistently overestimates the maximal aortic diameter measurements in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms compared with duplex ultrasound.      

The population prevalence of undetected abdominal aortic aneurysm in New Zealand Māori

BackgroundThe prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in Polynesian populations such as the New Zealand Māori has not been characterized. We measured this in a large population-based sample.MethodsA cross-sectional population-based prevalence study was conducted as part of an AAA screening pilot; 2467 Māori men aged 54 to 74 years and 1526 women aged 65 to 74 years registered with a primary care practice in Auckland (New Zealand) were invited to be screened by abdominal ultrasound between June 2016 and March 2018. Patients with pre-existing AAA disease and those with terminal conditions or circumstances that would make them unlikely to benefit from screening were excluded. The prevalence rate of AAA in Māori women was calculated with a cutoff definition of 27 mm as well as with the normal 30-mm definition (used in men). A log-binomial regression model estimated the prevalence rate at exactly 65 years for the purpose of comparison with screened populations in the United Kingdom.ResultsThe crude prevalence rate of undiagnosed AAA in Māori men aged 60 to 74 years was 3.6%. In women, it was 1.7% at the 30-mm threshold and 2.3% at 27 mm. The prevalence rate at exactly 65 years of age was calculated from the log-binomial regression model to be 2.7% (confidence interval [CI], 2.0%-3.8%) in men, 0.9% (CI, 0.4%-2.2%) in women at the 30-mm threshold, and 1.5% (CI, 0.7%-3.0%) in women at the 27-mm threshold. Among smokers, the crude prevalence rates were 7.5% (CI, 4.9%-11.5%) in men and 6.9% (CI, 4.1%-11.5%) in women (30 mm+).ConclusionsThe prevalence of undiagnosed AAA in New Zealand Māori men is considerably higher than in screened populations of equivalent age in the United Kingdom and Sweden. Prevalence rates in New Zealand Māori women are close to those of screened British men. New Zealand should consider implementing a population-based screening program for Māori men and conduct further research into the health impact of screening Māori women.     

The Long-term Benefits of a Single Scan for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) at Age 65

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of a single ultrasonic scan at age 65 to identify patients at risk from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHOD: A total of 6058 men aged 64-81 were recruited to a randomised trial, and 3000 were invited to attend a single screening test. An additional population of 1011 men was offered screening as they reached age 65. If a normal aorta was identified in this sub-group, further scans were offered at two-yearly intervals. Follow up and treatment of those identified as having an aortic dilatation of 3 cm or greater was undertaken. All subject groups were monitored for deaths occurring over the study period, and date and cause of death were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 2212 men attended screening in the randomised trial; the overall compliance was 74%, and prevalence of AAA was 7.7%. Compliance decreased, and prevalence increased, with age. Mortality from ruptured AAA was reduced by 68% at 5 years (screened group compared to the age-matched control population), and by 42% in the study arm (screened and refusers) compared with controls. The benefit persisted at ten years (53% and 21% respectively). Of the uncontrolled sample of 1011 men offered a scan at age 65, 681 attended and 649 of these were found to have a normal aortic diameter; re-screening demonstrated new aneurysm development in 4% over ten years. The aortic diameters of the new AAAs were under 4 cm and would therefore have a low risk of rupture.1 Mortality from rupture in all those with an initially normal aortic diameter was low, at 1 case per 1000 scans over ten years. CONCLUSION: Screening once for AAA at age 65 can identify the majority of AAA that are of clinical significance and can identify a large population at low risk from rupture who do not require surveillance. This policy has been effective when combined with selective treatment in reducing the risk of rupture for ten years in those who attend the screening programme.     

Heart Team therapeutic decision-making and treatment in severe aortic valve stenosis

Objectives After transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been available for high-risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AVS), the decision-making of the Heart Team (HT) has not been examined. Design All adult patients with severe AVS referred to a large tertiary medical centre in 2011 were prospectively included. Multivariate regression analysis identified independent factors associated with treatment decisions. Results A total of 487 patients were included (mean age: 75 years, NYHA class III–IV: 47%). The HT proposed medical therapy (MT) in 35 (7%), TAVI in 60 (12%), and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in 392 (81%) of patients. In patients referred to intervention, TAVI compared with SAVR patients were older (OR?=?1.17 per year, 95% CI 1.09–1.26; p?<?0.01) with more previous coronary artery bypass surgery (OR?=?385, 79–2738; p?<?0.01), obesity (OR?=?4.69, 1.51–13.77; p?<?0.01), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR?=?3.66, 1.21–10.75; p?=?0.02). MT patients compared with patients referred to any intervention were older, had a higher prevalence of COPD, peripheral arterial disease, previous myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular disease. Conclusions The HT proposed intervention in 93% of patients with severe AVS despite high age, advanced symptoms and a high burden of co-morbidity. TAVI was reserved for older patients particularly with previous CABG.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm: incidence in a population at risk

One hundred twenty patients aged fifty years and over underwent screening by ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysms as part of their routine follow-up visit to a cardiologist. The overall incidence of aneurysm greater than or equal to 4 centimeters in diameter was 5%. In the 84 men with aortas less than 4 centimeters, the average aorta size was 2.4 centimeters. In the 30 women with aortas less than 4 centimeters, the average aorta size was significantly smaller, 1.9 centimeters (p less than .001). It was discovered that men who smoke and have hypertension have a statistically significant increase in aorta size compared to those men without these risk factors (less than .05). The results indicate that the incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm is probably high enough in this population to justify screening by ultrasound.     

Population screening reduces mortality rate from aortic aneurysm in men

BACKGROUND: Rupture of an unsuspected abdominal aortic aneurysm is a major cause of death in men over the age of 65 years. A significant reduction in deaths is likely to result only from higher rates of detection and increased numbers of elective aneurysm repairs. Screening of men reaching the age of 65 years has been taking place in the county of Gloucestershire, UK since 1990 and the aim of this study was to investigate any change in the mortality rate from aortic aneurysm in the screened portion of the population. METHODS: Total number of deaths from all aortic aneurysm-related causes in the county's population was calculated from hospital and post-mortem records, together with computerized death certificate records, for the years 1994-1998. The overall number of aneurysm-related deaths in men aged 65-73 years, who have been progressively influenced by the screening programme, was compared with that for men of all other ages. RESULTS: The total number of aneurysm-related deaths in men aged 65-73 years decreased progressively year by year between 1994 and 1998; this reduction is highly statistically significant (P < 0. 001). No such change was observed in the unscreened part of the population. CONCLUSION: Screening for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm results in a significant reduction in numbers of deaths from all aneurysm-related causes in the screened portion of the male population.     

Natural history of abdominal aortic aneurysm with and without coexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Purpose:To study the relation between abdominal aortic aneurysms and chronical obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in particular the suggested common elastin degradation caused by elastase and smoking. Methods:A cross-sectional population study and a prospective cohort study of small abdominal aortic aneurysms was performed in a community setting. All previous diagnoses recorded in a hospital computer database were received for 4404 men 65 to 73 years of age who had been invited to a population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. One hundred forty-one men had AAA (4.2%). They were asked to participate in an interview, a clinical examination, and collection of blood sample. Men with an abdominal aortic aneurysm 3 to 5 cm in diameter were offered annual ultrasound scans to check for expansion. Results:Among patients with COPD 7.7% had abdominal aortic aneurysms (crude odds ratio = 2.05). The adjusted odds ratio, however, was only 1.59 after adjustment for coexisting diseases associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (P = .13). The mean annual expansion was 2.74 mm per year among patients with COPD, 2.72 among patients without COPD, and 4.7 mm among patients who used oral steroids compared with 2.6 among patients who did not use steroids (P < .05). Concentration of serum elastin peptide and plasma elastase–α₁-antitrypsin complexes correlated negatively with forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁) among patients with COPD. However, multivariate regression analysis showed that concentration of serum elastin peptide, therapy with β-agonists, and FEV₁ correlated positively with degree of expansion but that concentration of plasma elastase–α₁-antitrypsin complexes and serum α₁-antitrypsin did not influence expansion, suggesting that elastase plays an important role in the pathogenesis of COPD but not of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Conclusion:The high prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among patients with COPD is more likely to be caused by medication and coexisting diseases rather than a common pathway of pathogenesis. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:226-33.)     

A Multicentre Observational Study of the Outcomes of Screening Detected Sub-aneurysmal Aortic Dilatation

ObjectivesCurrently most abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programmes discharge patients with aortic diameter of less than 30 mm. However, sub-aneurysmal aortic dilatation (25 mm–29 mm) does not represent a normal aortic diameter. This observational study aimed to determine the outcomes of patients with screening detected sub aneurysmal aortic dilatation.Design and methodsIndividual patient data was obtained from 8 screening programmes that had performed long term follow up of patients with sub aneurysmal aortic dilatation. Outcome measures recorded were the progression to true aneurysmal dilatation (aortic diameter 30 mm or greater), progression to size threshold for surgical intervention (55 mm) and aneurysm rupture.ResultsAortic measurements for 1696 men and women (median age 66 years at initial scan) with sub-aneurysmal aortae were obtained, median period of follow up was 4.0 years (range 0.1–19.0 years). Following Kaplan Meier and life table analysis 67.7% of patients with 5 complete years of surveillance reached an aortic diameter of 30 mm or greater however 0.9% had an aortic diameter of 54 mm. A total of 26.2% of patients with 10 complete years of follow up had an AAA of greater that 54 mm.ConclusionPatients with sub-aneurysmal aortic dilatation are likely to progress and develop an AAA, although few will rupture or require surgical intervention.     

Urinary retention after endovascular treatment for aortic aneurysm: A single hospital experience

ObjectiveAfter endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for aortic aneurysm, some patients may develop urinary retention that may be vasogenic or neurogenic. This single-institution study investigated the characteristics of patients who developed urinary retention after EVAR for aortic aneurysm.Materials and MethodsPatients with thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysms and who underwent EVAR between November 2005 and October 2012 were reviewed. Those with post-operative urinary retention requiring urodynamic evaluation with filling cystometry (CMG) were identified. Their characteristics, surgical details, and urodynamic findings were collected for analysis.ResultsDuring the study period, 736 patients received endovascular treatment. Ten patients (nine males and one female; mean age at surgery, 71 ± 15.0 years) developed post-operative urinary retention, for an incidence rate of 1.36%. Two had co-morbid benign prostatic obstruction but all had aneurysm involving the thoracic aorta, with the largest mean aneurysm diameter at 64.8 ± 22.6 mm. All of the distal landing zones were above the celiac trunk and without occlusion of the blood supply to the urinary bladder. Seven patients had cerebrovascular complications or spinal cord ischemia. The CMG done within three months showed detrusor normoreflexia or over-activity in five, poor compliance of the urinary bladder in three, and acontractile detrusor in two patients. Those with acontractile detrusor had detrusor over-activity on follow-up CMG. Eight had successful decatheterization, while two with poor compliance of the urinary bladder needed long-term catheterization. The mean urethral catheter retention duration was 51.4 ± 33.1 days.ConclusionsUrinary retention is a rare complication after EVAR for thoracic aortic aneurysm. Spinal cord ischemia or cerebrovascular complications may be contributory.     

A systematic review and meta-analysis of proximal aortic neck dilatation after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveTo provide an updated systematic literature review summarizing current evidence on aortic neck dilatation (AND) after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.MethodsAn extensive electronic search in major electronic databases was conducted between January 2000 and December 2021. Eligible for inclusion were observational studies that followed up with patients (n ≥ 20) undergoing EVAR with self-expanding endografts, for 12 or more months, evaluated AND with computed tomography angiography and provided data on relevant outcomes. The primary end point was the incidence of AND after EVAR, and the secondary end points were the occurrence of type Ia endoleak, stent graft migration, secondary rupture, and reintervention.ResultsWe included 34 studies with a total sample of 12,038 patients (10,413 men; median age, 71 years). AND was defined clearly in 18 studies, but significant differences in AND definition were evidenced. The pooled incidence of AND based on quantitative analysis of 16 studies with a total of 9201 patients (7961 men; median age, 72 years) was calculated at 22.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.4-34.4) over a follow-up period ranging from 12 months to 14 years. The risk of a type Ia endoleak was significantly higher in AND patients compared with those without AND (odds ratio, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.10-7.93; P = .030). Similarly, endograft migration was more common in the AND group compared with the non-AND group (odds ratio, 5.95; 95% CI, 1.80-19.69; P = .004). The combined incidence of secondary rupture and reintervention did not differ significantly between the two groups, even though the combined effect was in favor of the non-AND group.ConclusionsProximal AND after EVAR is common and occurs in a large proportion of patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. AND can influence the long-term durability of proximal endograft fixation and is significantly related to adverse outcomes, often leading to reinterventions.     

The relationship between abdominal aortic aneurysm wall compliance, maximum diameter and growth rate.

AIM: Aortic compliance as measured by the pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep) and stiffness (beta), may allow a more precise estimate of rupture risk. The aim of this study was to determine the relationships between compliance, maximal aneurysm diameter and growth rate. METHODS: Sixty abdominal aortic aneurysm patients of median age 73 years, were studied. Growth rate was derived from repeat ultrasound scans obtained over a median period of 21 months (range 6-48). At the end of follow-up, patients underwent measurement of maximum aortic diameter, Ep and beta using the Diamove echo-tracking system. RESULTS: Growth rate correlated positively (r = 0.6, P < 0.01) with maximum diameter on entry to the study There was a positive correlation between mean arterial pressure and Ep (r = 0.3, P = 0.03), but not between mean arterial pressure and beta (r = 0.8, P = 0.61). A positive correlation was found between final maximum diameter and Ep (r = 0.22, P = 0.04) but not beta (r = 0.16, P = 0.11). There was no significant relationship between growth rate and Ep or beta. CONCLUSION: Large aneurysms tended to be less compliant. Within a population of abdominal aortic aneurysm of similar maximum diameter there was a 10-fold variation in Ep and beta. Compliance and growth rate were not related. If aortic compliance is related to risk of rupture then this predictive information is likely to be largely independent of that currently obtained from size and growth rate.