Bilateral cochlear implantation in children

AIMS: to determine the benefit of bilateral cochlear implantation in a child on speech and language development. METHOD: This child got her first implant, a Nucleus 24-system, on the right side at the age of 2.5 years. The left side was implanted at the age of 4.4 years with a Nucleus 24Contour-system. On the right side she's now wearing an Esprit 24-speechprocessor (SPR). On the left side she has a Sprint-SPR. M. goes to a mainstream school and receives Speech and Language therapy in a Speech and Hearing Rehab Centre. The etiology of her deafness was hyperbilirubinemia. Auditory capacity and speech recognition tests were performed for both ears separately and together. RESULTS: Aided thresholds give a PTA of 28 dBA with the first implant, 22 dBA with the second implant and with both implants we get a PTA of 23 dBA. Results for speech identification and recognition demonstrated an increased performance when both implants are used together. Speech and language development was equivalent to the mean of age 4.5. At the time of testing M. was 4.8 years. At this time the speech and language development show no delays with normal hearing children. CONCLUSIONS: bilateral cochlear implantation in children may have additional value for their speech and language development. Also, implantation may be considered when auditory neuropathy is likely.     

Development of auditory skills after cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations

Conclusions: CI improves hearing thresholds and auditory skills in children with most types of inner ear malformations. However, the development of sound detection skills is not as good as it is in children without inner ear malformations. Objectives: To investigate the influence of inner ear malformations on development of auditory skills after cochlear implantation (CI). Methods: Records of 20 children with inner ear malformations who underwent cochlear implantation before 4 years of age and followed up for more than 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Hearing thresholds, the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), and Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS) scores before and after CI were analyzed and compared with 20 age-matched deaf children who underwent CI. Results: The children with inner ear malformations showed significant improvements in hearing thresholds and the MAIS and MUSS scores 1 year after CI (p?p?p?相似文献   

Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory and speech development of children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder

Objective

To evaluate the auditory and speech abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) after cochlear implantation (CI) and determine the role of age at implantation.

Methods

Ten children participated in this retrospective case series study. All children had evidence of ANSD. All subjects had no cochlear nerve deficiency on magnetic resonance imaging and had used the cochlear implants for a period of 12–84 months. We divided our children into two groups: children who underwent implantation before 24 months of age and children who underwent implantation after 24 months of age. Their auditory and speech abilities were evaluated using the following: behavioral audiometry, the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS), the Standard-Chinese version of the Monosyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test (LNT), the Multisyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test (MLNT), the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) and the Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS).

Results

All children showed progress in their auditory and language abilities. The 4-frequency average hearing level (HL) (500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz) of aided hearing thresholds ranged from 17.5 to 57.5 dB HL. All children developed time-related auditory perception and speech skills. Scores of children with ANSD who received cochlear implants before 24 months tended to be better than those of children who received cochlear implants after 24 months. Seven children completed the Mandarin Lexical Neighborhood Test. Approximately half of the children showed improved open-set speech recognition.

Conclusion

Cochlear implantation is helpful for children with ANSD and may be a good optional treatment for many ANSD children. In addition, children with ANSD fitted with cochlear implants before 24 months tended to acquire auditory and speech skills better than children fitted with cochlear implants after 24 months.     

Cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened children with residual hearing

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the speech perception skills of prelingually deafened French children with preoperative residual hearing who received multichannel cochlear implants. DESIGN: The design of the study incorporated a within-subject, repeated measures design for assessing speech perception skills. SETTING: Montpellier, Toulouse and Lyon Pediatric Cochlear Implant Centers. SUBJECTS: Seven prelingually deafened children demonstrating marginal benefit from conventional amplification prior to implantation with a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant, served as subjects for the speech perception assessment (a speech recognition score less than 30% defines marginal benefit from acoustic amplification on open set materials). The mean age at implantation was 7 years, 9 months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception skills were assessed using open set materials and the MUSS and MAIS questionnaires. RESULTS: Open-set speech recognition averaged 21.4% before implantation, and 83.6% after 1 year's cochlear implant experience. All children demonstrated an open-set score over 60% after 12 months of CI use. MAIS test scores averaged 18.1/40 before implantation and 35.1/40 after 9 months of CI use. MUSS test scores averaged 24.4/40 before implantation and 34.1/40 after 9 months of CI use. CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation should be considered for prelingually hearing impaired children demonstrating marginal benefit from hearing aids, with a speech recognition score less than 30% on open set materials, in order to improve their speech discrimination skills.     

Assessment of basal sound identification skills and communication abilities in profoundly deaf children fitted with hearing aids or a cochlear implant

Basal auditory functions and early verbal communication skills were examined in young, profoundly deaf children with hearing aids or a cochlear implant. The hearing aid users (n = 23) were subdivided on the basis of their (unaided) hearing thresholds into: group A (pure tone average (PTA) at 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz: 90–100 dB HL); group B (PTA: 100–110 dB HL); and group C (PTA > 110 dB HL). All the children with a cochlear implant (n = 20) had a profound sensorineural hearing loss with a PTA that exceeded 120 dB HL. Functional hearing was evaluated by means of basal sound identification. The child’s communication abilities with hearing aids or a cochlear implant were assessed using structured observations on the Scales of Early Communication Skills for Hearing Impaired Children. The basal auditory functions on a sound identification level improved over time in the cochlear implant users and groups A and B. Hardly any improvement was seen in group C. The performance of all the groups (either hearing aid or cochlear implant) on the Scales of Early Communication Skills for Hearing Impaired Children at 6 months after fitting the device and at later evaluations, was close to the average level for their age.     

有低频残余听力感音神经聋的人工耳蜗植入术

目的介绍一种有低频残余听力感音神经聋的人工耳蜗植入技术,探讨人工耳蜗植入手术对有残余听力患者的治疗效果和价值。方法15例有残余听力的患者接受了保护残余听力的人工耳蜗植入手术。术中电极植入深度在19mm～24mm左右。术后分别检测单纯使用助听器、单纯使用人工耳蜗、人工耳蜗结合助听器三种不同状态下的听力。结果15例患者中,有13例术后残余听力保存良好,仅分别丢失5～20dB听力,但另2例术后残余听力全部丧失。术后在安静、信噪比15dB和10dB三种不同状态下的言语测试结果显示,人工耳蜗结合助听器使用者测试得分始终保持在很高水平;单纯使用人工耳蜗者也有较好的成绩,但在信噪比达10dB的条件下,测试成绩下降;而单纯使用助听器者,不仅在安静状态下听力成绩不甚理想,一旦加入竞争性噪声,听力测试成绩急剧下降。结论保护和利用残余听力的人工耳蜗植入技术,使人工耳蜗植入手术对象从重度或极重度聋扩大到高频为重度或极重度聋,低频（≤500Hz）为中、轻度聋的患者。接受这项技术患者的听力和言语识别能力均明显优于其单纯配戴助听器和单纯使用人工耳蜗时的听力和言语识别能力。     

1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate speech recognition in quiet and in noise for a group of 12 children, all of whom underwent sequential bilateral cochlear implantation at various ages (range, 1 yr, 8 mo to 9 yr, 6 mo at time of second implant). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Outpatient cochlear implant clinic. PATIENTS: Children who underwent sequential bilateral cochlear implantation. INTERVENTION: Rehabilitative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech recognition in quiet was evaluated for each ear separately using single-word speech recognition assessments (Multisyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test and Early Speech Perception Test) via recorded presentation. Speech recognition in noise was assessed for each ear separately and in the bilateral condition by obtaining a spondee recognition threshold in the presence of speech-weighted noise presented at 45 dB hearing level. The primary outcome measure for speech recognition in noise assessment was the signal-to-noise ratio for 50% performance, which was calculated by determining the difference between the presentation level of the noise and the presentation level at which the speech recognition threshold was obtained. The results of these assessments were contrasted between children receiving their second cochlear implant before 4 years of age and children receiving their second cochlear implant after 4 years of age. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference for speech recognition scores in quiet was obtained between the early-implanted ear and the late-implanted ears for children receiving their second cochlear implant after 4 years of age. There was not a statistically significant difference in speech recognition scores in quiet between the early-implanted and late-implanted ears of children receiving their second cochlear before 4 years of age. Both groups of children possessed better speech recognition scores in noise (statistically significant at an alpha = 0.05) in the bilateral condition relative to either unilateral condition. However, there was not a statistically significant relationship between speech recognition performance in noise and the duration of deafness of the later implanted ear. CONCLUSION: Bilateral cochlear implantation allowed for better speech recognition in noise relative to unilateral performance for a group of 12 children who underwent sequential bilateral cochlear implantation at various ages. There was not a statistically significant relationship between speech recognition in noise benefit, which was defined as the difference in performance between the first implanted ear and the bilateral condition and the age at which the second implant was received. Children receiving bilateral cochlear implants younger than 4 years of age achieved better speech recognition in quiet performance for the later implanted ear as compared with children receiving their second cochlear implant after 4 year of age.     

Pediatric cochlear implantation in Taiwan: long-term communication outcomes

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Cochlear implantation is an established method of auditory rehabilitation for severely and profoundly hearing impaired individuals. Although numerous studies have examined communication outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients, data concerning the benefits of cochlear implantation in children who speak Mandarin Chinese are lacking. This study examined communication outcomes in 29 Mandarin-speaking children implanted at Chung Gung Memorial Hospital. DESIGN: A prospective between-groups design was used to compare communication outcomes as a function of age at time of implantation. METHODS: Children in the Younger group were implanted before 3 years of age, whereas children in the Older group were implanted after 3 years of age. Outcome measures assessed auditory thresholds, speech perception, speech intelligibility, receptive and expressive language skills, communication barriers, and communication mode. Correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship between communication outcome and age at implantation. RESULTS: Children in the Younger group demonstrated a significant level of difference on Mandarin vowels, consonants, tones, and open-set speech perception compared with the children in the Older group. Between-group differences were also shown on receptive and expressive language skills. But, no significant differences were noted on speech intelligibility or in self-ratings of communication barriers. A larger proportion of children in the Younger group used oral communication and were educated in mainstream classrooms. Communication mode change of the Younger group reached a significant level after cochlear implant. Speech perception performance was negatively correlated with age at implantation as well as chronological age. Mandarin-speaking children can obtain substantial communication benefits from cochlear implantation, with earlier implantation yielding superior results.     

Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: There is little information on speech and language development in pre-school children with mild, moderate or severe hearing impairment. The primary aim of the study is to establish a reference material for clinical use covering various aspects of speech and language functions and to relate test values to pure tone audiograms and parents' judgement of their children's hearing and language abilities. METHODS: Nine speech and language tests were applied or modified, both classical tests and newly developed tests. Ninety-seven children with normal hearing and 156 with hearing impairment were tested. Hearing was 80 dB HL PTA or better in the best ear. Swedish was their strongest language. None had any additional diagnosed major handicaps. The children were 4-6 years of age. The material was divided into 10 categories of hearing impairment, 5 conductive and 5 sensorineural: unilateral; bilateral 0-20; 21-40; 41-60; 61-80 dB HL PTA. The tests, selected on the basis of a three component language model, are phoneme discrimination; rhyme matching; Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-III, word perception); Test for Reception of Grammar (TROG, grammar perception); prosodic phrase focus; rhyme construction; Word Finding Vocabulary Test (word production); Action Picture Test (grammar production); oral motor test. RESULTS: Only categories with sensorineural loss showed significant differences from normal. Word production showed the most marked delay for 21-40 dB HL: 5 and 6 years p<0.01; for 41-60 dB: 4 years p<0.01 and 6 years p<0.01 and 61-80 dB: 5 years p<0.05. Phoneme discrimination 21-40 dB HL: 6 years p<0.05; 41-60 dB: 4 years p<0.01; 61-80 dB: 4 years p<0.001, 5 years p<0.001. Rhyme matching: no significant difference as compared to normal data. Word perception: sensorineural 41-60 dB HL: 6 years p<0.05; 61-80 dB: 4 years p<0.05; 5 years p<0.01. Grammar perception: sensorineural 41-60 dB HL: 6 years p<0.05; 61-80 dB: 5 years p<0.05. Prosodic phrase focus: 41-60 dB HL: 5 years p<0.01. Rhyme construction: 41-60 dB HL: 4 years p<0.05. Grammar production: 61-80 dB HL: 5 years p<0.01. Oral motor function: no differences. The Word production test showed a 1.5-2 years delay for sensorineural impairment 41-80 dB HL through 4-6 years of age. There were no differences between hearing-impaired boys and girls. Extended data for the screening test [E. Borg, A. Risberg, B. McAllister, B.M. Undemar, G. Edquist, A.C. Reinholdsson, et al., Language development in hearing-impaired children. Establishment of a reference material for a "Language test for hearing-impaired children", Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 65 (2002) 15-26] are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Reference values for expected speech and language development are presented that cover nearly 60% of the studied population. The effect of the peripheral hearing impairment is compensated for in many children with hearing impairment up to 60 dB HL. Above that degree of impairment, language delay is more pronounced, probably due to a loss of acuity. The importance of central cognitive functions, speech reading and signing for compensation of peripheral limitations is pointed out.     

Results of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss—Implications for Patient Selection

In patients with some residual hearing and minor benefit from conventional hearing aids, the benefits of cochlear implantation have to be weighed carefully against eventual adverse effects. In this study, pre- and post-operative thresholds as well as functional results after cochlear implantation are reported; 17 of 44 implanted adults had residual hearing pre-operatively (mean threshold(_{250 to 4000 Hz}): 106 dB HL) in the implanted ear. Residual hearing in the implanted ear could not, in general, be preserved post-operatively.

Seventeen of 44 implanted children had some amount of residual hearing in the implanted ear pre-operatively (implanted ear: 114 dB HL; contralateral ear: 109.9 dB HL; mean thresholds(_{250 to 4000 Hz)})).

Contrary to the results in adults, residual hearing in the implanted ear remained statistically unchanged. Hearing in the contralateral ear increased significantly from 109.9 to 101.9 dB HL post-operatively. This increase was mainly attributed to maturation of the central auditory pathway. In adults with residual hearing, the monosyllable word recognition scores increased significantly from 9 per cent pre-operatively to 42 per cent post-operatively. Children with residual hearing tended to perform better on speech-related test material compared to children without prior auditory experience. Cochlear implantation is indicated in adults and children with residual hearing and minor benefit from conventional amplification. The contralateral ear in children should be considered for additional acoustical stimulation.     

Cochlear implantation in recipients with single-sided deafness: Audiological performance

Objective: To examine the auditory benefit of cochlear implants (CI) in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD).

Material and methods: Twenty patients with a normal pure tone audiogram (n?=?8) or moderate hearing loss (n?=?12) in one ear and a CI system MED-EL SONATA/CONCERTO?+?OPUS2 (n?=?12), COCHLEAR CI24RE(ST)?+?CP810 (n?=?7) and Advanced Bionics HiRes90?K?+?Harmony (n?=?1) in the contralateral ear and with at least 6 months of CI experience were tested with respect to directional hearing, speech perception in noise, binaural loudness matching, and binaural pitch matching. Twenty-six normal hearing controls were included for normative reference.

Results: Addition of the CI significantly improves directional hearing (percentage of correct source identifications improved from 14.9 to 15.6%, root mean square error decreased from 125 to 93°) and improves speech perception in noise (speech perception threshold median improved from ?2.3 to ?6.0?dB signal to noise ratio, equivalent to a binaural intelligibility level difference?=?3.7?dB). Alternate binaural loudness balancing showed that matching takes place at levels between 48 and 55?dB HL (group averages). In the pitch matching experiment, the standard deviation of the relative interaural frequency difference at 500, 1000, and 2000?Hz was 24.5, 22.8, and 24.0%, respectively (compared to 11.7, 14.4, and 12.3% in the control group).

Conclusions: In SSD, cochlear implantation considerably improves audiological performance in terms of directional hearing, binaural signal equivalence, and speech perception.     

Developmental delay and outcomes in paediatric cochlear implantation: implications for candidacy

OBJECTIVE: Criteria for paediatric cochlear implant candidacy continue to evolve, as research indicates an increasingly broad range of children for whom the procedure can produce benefit. Children with difficulties in addition to their deafness, or global developmental delay, are not routinely excluded. The aim of this study is to explore the association between developmental delay in young paediatric cochlear implant candidates and progress with the device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study is a retrospective case series analysis of 32 children, aged between 1.2 and 2.8 years at pre-implant assessment. Children were assessed using the Schedule of Growing Skills II and IT-MAIS before implantation. Progress in speech perception and Speech Intelligibility was monitored using the E2L toy test and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR), respectively, 1 and 2 years after switch-on. RESULTS: Data were subjected to regression analyses, with either the E2L or SIR as the outcome variables, and variables derived from the Schedule of Growing Skills II (general development and cognitive functioning), IT-MAIS, age at switch-on and average aided hearing loss pre-implant as the predictor variables. In each analysis the strongest (and statistically significant) predictors of speech perception and Speech Intelligibility were the measures of general development and cognitive functioning, accounting for around 40% of the variance in outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study indicates the value of routinely assessing the general development of young paediatric cochlear implant candidates, as part of the pre-implant decision-making process. Significant developmental delay is predictive of poor outcomes, but children with a mild delay do make appreciable progress. Developmental assessment of young deaf children is therefore important in terms of candidacy decisions and counselling parents regarding potential benefit from a cochlear implant.     

Effects of bilateral cochlear implants in children: Timing of second surgery and the significance of wearing bilateral cochlear implants in Japan

ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the speech perception with first, second, or bilateral cochlear implants (CI) and to reveal the effects of wearing bilateral CI in children.MethodsAfter reviewing the medical records, a total of 19 children who underwent bilateral cochlear implantation serially between 2012 and 2015 at Kyoto University Hospital (tertiary referral center) were included in this study. All patients had no delay in language development. The study group comprised nine boys and ten girls, and their age ranged from 3 years 8 months to 12 years 5 months when they underwent the tests in this study. The mean and median ages were 8 years 6 months and 9 years 2 months, respectively.We measured the appropriate signal/noise ratio (SNR) to test speech perception of Japanese language in noise by testing the hearing ability of unilateral CI patients with or without noise and by surveying the sound environment in a classroom of a mainstream elementary school.Speech perception in quiet and noise and the left-right localization ability were examined using first, second, or bilateral cochlear implants in all patients.ResultsConsidering the results of hearing ability tests with noise and the SNR of the elementary school classrooms, we decided to use SNR of +10 dB to evaluate the speech perception ability in noise. The speech perception ability using the second CI was significantly worse in patients undergoing second cochlear implantation after 7 years old than in those who underwent surgery before 3.5 years old. Moreover, patients undergoing second cochlear implantation before 7 years old showed significantly better left–right localization of high-frequency sound.ConclusionsSecond cochlear implantation before 7 years old is a critical factor in acquiring beneficial speech perception ability with the second CI and sound localization ability with the bilateral CI.     

Partial deafness cochlear implantation in children

OBJECTIVE: Partial deafness cochlear implantation and electric-acoustic stimulation have proven to be a useful method of treating adults with a ski-slope type hearing loss. Good hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes have been reported. This study aims to assess partial deafness cochlear implantation in children. METHOD: Nine children, ranging in age from 4.2 to 12 years, received a cochlear implant following the round window surgical technique for partial deafness cochlear implantation. Hearing preservation was assessed by pure-tone audiometry and speech perception outcomes were measured using monosyllable word tests in quiet and noise. Data are available for most children up to a period of 1 year. RESULTS: Hearing could be preserved partially in all cases, however, one child does not have sufficient preservation to make use of electric-acoustic stimulation. The eight children with sufficiently preserved hearing either use the natural low frequency hearing in combination with a cochlear implant to hear or use the DUET combined hearing system. Speech perception tests showed improvement in quiet and noise over time. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that partial deafness cochlear implantation is a viable treatment method in children. However, surgery should only be conducted by an experienced surgeon and parents need to be carefully counselled about the risks and benefits of partial deafness cochlear implantation.     

Connexin-associated deafness and speech perception outcome of cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE: To compare performance after cochlear implantation in children with mutations in connexin (Cx) 26 (GJB2) or Cx30 (GJB6) and children with deafness of unknown etiology. DESIGN: Genetic analysis and speech perception evaluation was performed in the children with and without Cx mutations who had undergone cochlear implantation. Speech perception performance was retrospectively analyzed 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after implantation. Test material was selected according to the child's age and cognitive and language abilities. SETTING: The study took place at speech and hearing and genetic centers of a hospital in the central part of Israel and the genetics departments of 3 additional centrally located hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 30 children who had undergone cochlear implantation were selected for the study, with control patients matched according to age at implantation, duration of implant use, and mode of communication. There was no evidence for additional disabilities or handicaps in either group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception measurements included a questionnaire, as well as closed and open-set tests. RESULTS: Overall, the 2 groups showed significant improvement in speech perception results after implantation. Four years after implantation, both groups achieved mean open-set speech perception scores of approximately 60%, 75%, and 90% for monosyllabic, 2 syllables, and words in sentences tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were no apparent differences in speech perception performance after implantation between the children with Cx mutations and children with deafness of unknown etiology. These data have important implications as a prognostic indicator when counseling candidates for cochlear implantation.     

Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants (CI) and single-sided deafness (SSD). Design: Mandarin speech recognition thresholds were adaptively measured in five listening conditions and four spatial configurations. The original signal was delivered to the left ear. The right ear received either no input, one of three CI simulations in which the insertion depth was varied, or the original signal. Speech and noise were presented at either front, left, or right. Study sample: Ten Mandarin-speaking NH listeners with pure-tone thresholds less than 20?dB HL. Results: Relative to no input in the right ear, the CI simulations provided significant improvements in head shadow benefit for all insertion depths, as well as better spatial release of masking (SRM) for the deepest simulated insertion. There were no significant improvements in summation or squelch for any of the CI simulations. Conclusions: The benefits of cochlear implantation were largely limited to head shadow, with some benefit for SRM. The greatest benefits were observed for the deepest simulated CI insertion, suggesting that reducing mismatch between acoustic and electric hearing may increase the benefit of cochlear implantation.     

9例人工耳蜗植入儿童术后康复评估结果分析

目的 探讨3～7岁在训聋儿植入人工耳蜗后听觉言语康复进展情况.方法 使用美国GSI-16配置声场的双声道临床听力计,在标准声场下对9例儿童进行人工耳蜗术后声场听阈测试;采用<聋儿听力语言康复评估方法>,在术后3、6、9、12个月分别进行听觉言语康复评估.结果 9例人工耳蜗植入儿童声场听阈测试均值为26～35 dB HL;随着术后时间的增加,9例儿童的听觉言语评估成绩逐步提高,术后12个月时平均言语识别率达89.8%,平均语言年龄为3.0岁.结论 人工耳蜗植入有助于重度、极重度聋儿的听力语言康复.     

Binaural–bimodal hearing: Concomitant use of a unilateral cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid

Conclusion. The benefit obtained with a contralateral hearing aid (HA) in unilateral cochlear implantees improves over time, at least during the first year after implantation. Objective. To evaluate binaural–bimodal auditory ability and its early changes over time after unilateral cochlear implantation in patients with residual hearing in the non-implanted ear, in which they use an HA. Material and methods. Sentence identification in background noise was tested in 12 patients (3 post-lingual adults and 9 pre-lingual adults and older children) under 3 listening conditions: cochlear implant (CI) alone, HA alone and CI?+?HA. The presentation level was 55 dB HL with a signal-to-noise ratio of +10 dB. Subjects were tested after 1–6 months of concomitant use of both devices and again after a further 7–12 months. Results. At the first testing session, the mean score in background noise was 34.9% with CI alone (range 0–90%) and 41.1% with both devices (range 0–100%). Seven patients could recognize sentences in noise with CI alone, and four of them showed further improvement with added amplification. At the second session, at which all subjects could recognize sentences in noise with the CI alone, seven showed further improvement with added amplification. The mean score was 60.6% with CI alone (range 10–99%) and 75.5% with both devices (range 52–100%).     

Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated outcomes and predictive factors, specifically language skills, for a group of prelingually hearing-impaired adults who received a cochlear implant. Design: Speech perception data, demographic information, and other related variables such as communication mode, residual hearing, and receptive language abilities were explored. Pre- and post-implant speech perception scores were compared and multiple regression analysis was used to identify significant predictive relationships. Study sample: The study included 43 adults with a prelingual onset of hearing loss, who proceeded with cochlear implantation at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Results: The majority of patients experienced benefit from their cochlear implants, with 88% demonstrating significant improvement in speech perception performance. Volunteers achieved better post-operative speech perception scores if they had a shorter duration of severe-to-profound hearing loss, better language skills, and used an exclusively oral communication mode. Conclusions: Although post-operative speech perception performance is significantly poorer for prelingually hearing-impaired adults compared to postlingually hearing-impaired patients, the study group demonstrated significant benefit from their cochlear implants. The variability in post-operative outcomes can be predicted to some extent from the hearing history and language abilities of the individual patient.     

Influence of contralateral acoustic hearing on adult bimodal outcomes after cochlear implantation

Objective: To examine post-implantation benefit and time taken to acclimate to the cochlear implant for adult candidates with more hearing in the contralateral non-implanted ear than has been previously considered within local candidacy guidelines. Design: Prospective, within-subject experimental design. Study sample: Forty postlingual hearing-impaired adult subjects with a contralateral ear word score in quiet ranging from 27% to 100% (median 67%). Results: Post-implantation improvement of 2.4?dB and 4.0?dB was observed on a sentence in coincident babble test at presentation levels of 65 and 55?dB SPL respectively, and a 2.1?dB benefit in spatial release from masking (SRM) advantage observed when the noise location favoured the implanted side. Significant post-operative group mean change of between 2.1 and 3.0 was observed on the sub-scales of the speech, spatial, and qualities (SSQ) questionnaire. Degree of post-implantation speech reception threshold (SRT) benefit on the coincident babble test and on perception of soft speech and sounds in the environment was greater for subjects with less contralateral hearing. The degree of contralateral acoustic hearing did not affect time taken to acclimate to the device. Conclusions: The findings from this study support cochlear implantation for candidates with substantial acoustic hearing in the contralateral ear, and provide guidance regarding post-implantation expectations.