Family history of early cardiovascular disease in children with moderate to severe hypercholesterolemia: relationship to lipoprotein (a) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is an established cardiovascular risk factor in adults. We sought to evaluate whether raised Lp(a) levels were predictive of a family history of early cardiovascular disease (CVD) in children already at increased risk for premature atherosclerosis because of elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Lp(a) and serum lipid levels were measured in 69 children and offspring with established moderate to severe hypercholesterolemia (serum cholesterol > 170 mg/dL) who were aged 10.7 +/- 4.3 years (range 1.5 to 21 years) and had been referred to a pediatric lipid center. The children represented families with a positive (n = 27) or negative (n = 42) history for premature CVD (<55 years of age in parent or grandparent). In all children, Lp(a) levels ranged from 1 to 140 mg/dL, with a median of 29 mg/dL. Mean total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were 234 mg/dL, 166 mg/dL, and 45 mg/dL, respectively. There was no difference in median Lp(a) levels between the children with a positive family history and those with a negative family history (29.9 mg/dL vs 29.0 mg/dL, respectively). In contrast, children with a positive family history showed significantly higher LDL cholesterol levels (186 +/- 61 mg/dL vs 153 +/- 52 mg/dL, P = .02). Thus, in this group of hypercholesterolemic children, LDL cholesterol but not Lp(a) levels were associated with a family history of premature CVD. Further studies are needed to identify additional specific risk factors associated with the development of CVD in this population.     

Effects of bezafibrate on HDL2/HDL3 ratio in postmenopausal hypertriglyceridemic women

The short-term effects of bezafibrate on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol quality and triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism in 186 postmenopausal hypertriglyceridemic women were investigated. Patients were randomized to an untreated group and to bezafibrate (400 mg/d) for 6 months. Fasting lipid concentrations, high-density lipoprotein 2, and high-density lipoprotein 3 levels were measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. At 3 months, bezafibrate had significantly decreased mean serum triglycerides and remnant-like particle cholesterol levels (105.7 +/- 43.4 mg/dL and 5.33 +/- 2.1 mg/dL, P < .001, respectively) from baseline values (232.5 +/- 63.9 mg/dL and 9.69 +/- 3.8 mg/dL, respectively). It also maintained lower total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and remnant-like particle cholesterol concentrations to 6 months. After 3 months, it significantly increased mean serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (55.1 +/- 14.7 vs 64.8 +/- 12.1 mg/dL; P < .0001) and maintained higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 6 months. The high-density lipoprotein 2-high-density lipoprotein 3 ratio was decreased after 3 months of therapy with bezafibrate (2.13 +/- 0.68) from the baseline (2.42 +/- 0.71) (P < .01).     

Standard lipid profile

The standard lipid profile has an enormous scientific evidence base and has provided simple clinical lipid-altering goals focused on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol that have been shown to reduce coronary heart disease. Its limitations in estimating LDL cholesterol are well known: increasing inaccuracies in the nonfasting state, in individuals with triglycerides greater than 200 to 400 mg/dL, and as an accurate measure of LDL particle risk in size and concentration. Until studies are done comparing the benefit of targeting LDL particle concentration and size versus ever lower LDL cholesterol concentration, widespread clinical use of continuing revisions of the standard lipid profile goals will continue to remain one of the giant clinical and public health achievements of the last 50 years.     

Prospective,noninterventional, uncontrolled,open-chart,pharmacoepidemiologic study of prescribing patterns for lipid-lowering drugs at a tertiary care teaching hospital in North India

BACKGROUND: The guidelines for management of dyslipidemia released by the US National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) have been questioned for their relevance in the South Asian Indian populations because these populations are reported to have significantly different lipoprotein parameters and atherogenic risk factors than Western populations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine current prescribing patterns for lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs) adopted by physicians in North India. METHODS: This prospective, noninterventional, uncontrolled, open-chart, pharmacoepidemiologic study was conducted from June 2000 to August 2000 at a tertiary care hospital in North India and included 200 dyslipidemic patients. The pattern of prescribing LLDs was recorded, along with the serum levels of lipid parameters-total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a])-at the time of initiating LLD therapy and compared with the 1993 NCEP-II therapeutic guidelines for dyslipidemia management. RESULTS: The mean (SD) levels of lipid parameters in the study population were as follows: TC, 223.2 (21.5) mg/dL; TG, 258.4 (61.3) mg/dL; LDL-C, 131.6 (26.5) mg/dL; HDL-C, 39.8 (8.9) mg/dL; and Lp(a), 44.8 (26.8) mg/dL. The LLDs prescribed were fibrates (53.5%) and statins (46.5%). Forty percent of patients prescribed LLDs did not meet the NCEP-II criteria for initiation of LLD therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable differences in prescribing patterns of LLDs were observed compared with the then-prevalent NCEP-II guidelines. However, due to the abnormally high serum Lp(a) levels present in the average dyslipidemia profile in South Asian Indian populations, this pattern was in accordance with the specific recommendations made for these populations, as well as with the 2001 NCEP-III guidelines.     

Circulating electronegatively charged low-density lipoprotein in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease

There is growing experimental evidence to suggest the role of oxidatively modified low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. The oxidation of lipoprotein moiety causes modification of positively charged lysine residues and results in negative net charge of lipoprotein particles. OBJECTIVE: To measure the amount of circulating electronegatively charged LDL particles (LDL-) in plasma of patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Thirty patients were assigned to the study group (CAD+) and 10 patients to the control group (Ctrl). LDL- was quantitated in homogeneous LDL fractions obtained by ultracentrifugation, using ion exchange high performance liquid chromatography. Plasma lipids were measured using enzymatic kits. RESULTS: The CAD+ group had significantly higher levels of LDL- in the whole LDL fraction (7.66+/-1.92 vs. 5.14+/-0.84%, p=0.0003). Moreover the CAD+ group had significantly higher levels of total cholesterol (255.4+/-35.1 vs. 210.4+/-22.4 mg/dL), LDL cholesterol (154.5+/-26.9 vs. 122.4+/-21.1 mg/dL) and significantly lower levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (40.4+/-9.4 vs. 51.0+/-11.5 mg/dL). LDL- remained significantly higher in the CAD+ group after adjustment for total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol (6.3 vs. 5.14% at p=0.0095). There is a trend towards a positive correlation between LDL- levels and LDL cholesterol in the control group (Spearman R=0.55 at p=0.098). CONCLUSIONS: Electronegatively charged LDL appears to be an additional hallmark of coronary artery disease, independently of established lipid risk factors. The trend towards a positive correlation between LDL cholesterol concentration and the level of LDL- in the control group may reflect the susceptibility of LDL cholesterol to autoxidation, Moreover, this may indicate other oxidative mechanisms in coronary artery disease. Nonetheless, further studies assessing the prognostic value of electronegatively charged LDLs are necessary.     

Efficacy of atorvastatin therapy in ischaemic heart disease - effects on oxidized low-density lipoprotein and adiponectin

The lipid-lowering and anti-atherosclerotic effects of atorvastatin (10 mg/day) were investigated by measuring changes in the levels of oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL), serum lipids (total cholesterol [TC], LDL-cholesterol [LDL-C] and triglycerides [TG]), and in the protein adiponectin. This was undertaken in 22 patients with ischaemic heart disease and serum LDL-C levels > 100 mg/dl. After 3 months of therapy, atorvastatin significantly decreased serum lipids, oxidized LDL was reduced from 457.0 +/- 148.6 to 286.9 +/- 88.5 nmol/l, and adiponectin increased from 9.7 +/- 7.4 to 13.9 +/- 9.98 microg/ml. No significant correlation was observed between adiponectin and LDL-C, TG and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Atorvastatin therapy was not associated with side-effects, such as myalgia and gastrointestinal disorders, and did not give abnormal laboratory test results. It is concluded that atorvastatin decreases serum lipid and oxidized LDL levels, and increases adiponectin levels in patients with ischaemic heart disease.     

A crossover comparison of the efficacy and safety of lovastatin and gemfibrozil in the treatment of hyperlipidemic organ transplant recipients.

Hypercholesterolemia is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis in transplant recipients. It has been notoriously difficult to treat pharmacologically due to the complex interactions that occur with lipid-lowering drugs and immunosuppressive therapies. The purpose of the current study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (lovastatin, 20 mg/d) with a fibric acid derivative (gemfibrozil, 600 mg twice a day). We used a randomized, crossover design in 18 solid organ transplant recipients who followed the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Guidelines diet for 8 weeks and had persistent elevations of total cholesterol (>240 mg/dL). Each patient received each therapy for a minimum of 8 weeks (mean 14.2 +/- 2.4, range 8-20 weeks). The participants had stable allograft function and were treated with a standard immunosuppressive regimen containing cyclosporine, prednisone, and azathioprine. Lovastatin therapy reduced the mean total cholesterol by 15.5% (271.9 mg/dL to 229.9 mg/dL; p = 0.02) and the mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 22.7% (178.2 mg/dL to 137.8 mg/dL; p = 0.07). There were no significant changes in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglycerides. Conversely, when these same patients were treated with gemfibrozil, the mean total cholesterol decreased by 7.9% (271.9 mg/dL to 250.5 mg/dL; p = NS) and the LDL cholesterol decreased by 5.1% (178.2 mg/dL to 169.1 mg/dL; p = NS). In addition, the mean triglyceride concentration decreased significantly by 46.1% (234.0 mg/dL to 126.3 mg/dL; p = 0.002) and the mean HDL cholesterol increased 15.4% (48.8 mg/dL to 56.3 mg/dL; p = 0.09). In all patients, the serum creatinine, hepatocellular enzymes, and creatinine phosphokinase remained stable. Lovastatin was discontinued in three patients for myalgias, one patient with unexplained anemia, and one patient with parasthesias. These results suggest that lovastatin and gemfibrozil are both safe and efficacious in transplant patients. However, neither therapy alone completely corrects abnormalities of high LDL cholesterol and low HDL cholesterol in transplant recipients.     

Niacin as a component of combination therapy for dyslipidemia

Dyslipidemia is one of the most important modifiable risk factors for coronary disease. Despite the availability of highly effective lipid-modifying agents, many patients still do not reach lipid targets established by national guidelines. Niacin has been known to be an effective treatment of dyslipidemia for almost half a century. Niacin substantially increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels while lowering levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, and lipoprotein(a). In addition, niacin converts small LDL particles into more buoyant, less atherogenic LDL particles. Combined with other agents, niacin offers an important treatment option for patients with dyslipidemia. In particular, niacin complements LDL-C-lowering drugs; it is the most effective agent available for increasing HDL-C levels while lowering levels of LDL-C and triglycerides and improving other lipid risk factors such as lipoprotein(a). Combining niacin with statins or bile acid sequestrant therapy is safe and effective for improving lipid levels and decreasing coronary risk. Differences in niacin formulations dictate tolerability profiles and should be considered when selecting niacin as part of lipid therapy. Furthermore, adverse effects on glucose and insulin sensitivity should be considered when selecting candidates for niacin therapy. Adding niacin to lipid-lowering regimens is a valuable option for physicians treating patients with dyslipidemia and should be considered in appropriate patients.     

Fenofibrate decreases plasma fibrinogen, improves lipid profile, and reduces uricemia.

Plasma fibrinogen has been found to be a major cardiovascular disease risk factor. This 2-year trial was designed to assess the effect of fenofibrate on fibrinogen and, as secondary end points, on lipid profile and uric acid in patients with dyslipidemia. Eighty subjects (40 women and 40 men) were admitted to either a control or an active group. Sixty-seven (84%) had sole hypercholesterolemia, 13 (16%) subjects had mixed dyslipidemia. The effect attributable to fenofibrate was a decrease of 15% in fibrinogen, 26% in the ratio low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-20% low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, +10% high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), 34% in triglycerides (median), and 13% in uric acid (P < .0001 for all). Fenofibrate simultaneously affected hemostasis (by lowering fibrinogenemia) and lipid profile. Because fenofibrate has few adverse effects, it could be a fair option for patients who need polytherapy and do not tolerate resins or niacin. Its clinical efficacy should be tested in long-term studies to assess its real capacity to prevent cardiovascular events.     

Treating serum lipid abnormalities in high-priority patients

Normalization of serum lipid levels should be initiated as soon as possible in patients with myocardial, cerebrovascular, or peripheral vascular disease. Clinical trials indicate that coronary artery disease and overall mortality rates can be reduced and atherosclerosis stabilized or reversed by lipid-lowering therapy. Treatment should lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels to 130 mg/dL or less and total triglyceride levels to 150 mg/dL or less and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels to at least 52 mg/dL in men and 66 mg/dL in women. Nonlipid coronary risk factors should be eliminated when possible. Lipid-lowering therapy may consist of dietary modification and drug treatment with colestipol hydrochloride (Colestid), cholestyramine (Cholybar, Questran), lovastatin (Mevacor), gemfibrozil (Lopid), and nicotinic acid (Nicolar).     

Efficacy and tolerability of lovastatin in elderly hypercholesterolemic patients.

In a previously published multicenter study (Kannel and associates, 1990), the effects of six months' treatment with lovastatin were evaluated in patients with hypercholesterolemia. In the present report the results from the 144 elderly patients (aged 65 to 83 years) are presented and compared with those from the 343 patients aged less than 65 years. The initial dose of lovastatin was 20 mg daily and could be increased to a maximum of 80 mg/day. After one month of treatment, in both the elderly and younger patients, levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides, and the total cholesterol: high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and LDL:HDL [corrected] cholesterol ratios were significantly lower and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly higher. These improvements in the lipid profile were maintained for six months in both patient groups. LDL cholesterol goals of less than 130 mg/dl in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) or two CHD risk factors and less than 160 mg/dl among the other patients were achieved by 53% of the elderly patients and 40% of the younger patients at one month (P less than 0.01) and by 62% and 47% at six months (P less than 0.01). By the end of the study, the mean daily dose of lovastatin was 35.4 mg for the elderly and 38.4 mg for the younger patients. The drug was generally well tolerated by all patients. The results indicate that both elderly and younger hypercholesterolemic patients respond well to treatment with lovastatin.     

Lipid and lipoprotein profile in physiological pregnancy

Physiologic pregnancy is associated with a broad series of metabolic adaptations which may also influence the metabolism of lipids and lipoproteins. Although the modification of serum lipids and lipoproteins has been exhaustively investigated during and after pregnancy, the relative changes recorded vary widely among the different studies. A comprehensive lipid and lipoprotein profile was evaluated in 57 women with uncomplicated pregnancies at different gestational ages (20 in the first, 20 in the second, and 17 in the third trimester of pregnancy) and compared to that of 21 non-pregnant women. Conventional lipid parameters, including total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides, were evaluated on the Modular System P. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was quantified by the formula of Friedewald, the atherogenic index of plasma was quantified by the formula log (triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), whereas lipoprotein(a) was assayed on the BN II nephelometric analyzer. We observed that all the lipid parameters tested were significantly modified by the gestational age; in particular, women in the second and third trimester displayed significantly increased total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, lipoprotein(a) and atherogenic index of plasma (third trimester only) when compared to either the control population or the subgroup of women in the first trimester of pregnancy. The value distributions and the relative percentage of women with undesirable or abnormal values according to the current NCEP or AHA/ACC goals were comparable between controls and women in the first trimester. However, when compared with either controls or women in the first trimester, advanced pregnancy was associated with an increased prevalence of undesirable or abnormal values for total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides in the second trimester, and total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, total to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and lipoprotein(a) (only from non-pregnant women) in the third trimester. The results of this case-control study demonstrate that physiological pregnancy is associated with a substantial modification of the lipid and lipoprotein metabolism from the second trimester, providing reference ranges for traditional and emerging cardiovascular risk predictors throughout the gestational period.     

Clinical update on the use of niacin for the treatment of dyslipidemia

PURPOSE: To provide nurse practitioners (NPs) with clinical and practical information about the use of niacin in the treatment of dyslipidemia. DATA SOURCES: Research-based and review articles in the medical literature and National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Niacin provides beneficial effects on all major lipid fractions, particularly high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides. Niacin also reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol; lipoprotein (a); and the number of highly atherogenic small, dense LDL particles. Niacin promotes angiographic regression when used in combination with other drugs that lower LDL cholesterol and can reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with coronary heart disease. Several niacin formulations are available, but the safety (i.e., from hepatotoxicity) and tolerability (i.e., severity of flushing) of these niacin formulations may differ. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Niacin therapy is appropriate for many types of lipid abnormalities, including complex dyslipidemias. NPs can take several steps to minimize potential side effects of niacin therapy and to ensure that patients adhere to this important intervention.     

Atorvastatin, a New HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor as Monotherapy and Combined With Colestipol

BACKGROUND: Atorvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor in clinical development has demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and marked cholesterol and triglyceride reduction at doses ranging from 10-80 mg/day. Since bile acid sequestering resins are often used in combination with HMGRIs to enhance cholesterol reduction, this trial was conducted to explore the use of atorvastatin alone and combined with colestipol in patients with primary hyperlipidemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred six patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol >4.1 mM/L (160 mg/dL) and plasma triglycerides <3.9 mM/L (350 mg/dL) were randomized to treatment consisting of 20 g/day colestipol, 10 mg/day atorvastatin, or 10 mg/day atorvastatin plus 20 g/day colestipol for 12 weeks. Percent change from baseline in lipid variables were measured. The atorvastatin group showed a significant reduction in LDL cholesterol of 35% after 12 weeks. Combination therapy provided an additional 10% reduction in LDL cholesterol over that observed for atorvastatin alone. Twenty-one percent of all patients in the atorvastatin monotherapy group experienced associated adverse events compared with 60% in the combination therapy group. Ninety percent of atorvastatin monotherapy patients were compliant at every visit compared with 75% receiving combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the combination of atorvastatin plus colestipol was more effective in lowering LDL cholesterol than atorvastatin alone, atorvastatin 10 mg/day monotherapy provided a better safety profile and improved patient compliance, which may result in improved long-term cholesterol control.     

Prognostic evaluation of primary non-small cell lung carcinoma patients using biological fluid variables. A systematic review

There is growing experimental evidence to suggest the role of oxidatively modified low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. The oxidation of lipoprotein moiety causes modification of positively charged lysine residues and results in negative net charge of lipoprotein particles. Objective: To measure the amount of circulating electronegatively charged LDL particles (LDL–) in plasma of patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: Thirty patients were assigned to the study group (CAD+) and 10 patients to the control group (Ctrl). LDL– was quantitated in homogeneous LDL fractions obtained by ultracentrifugation, using ion exchange high performance liquid chromatography. Plasma lipids were measured using enzymatic kits. Results: The CAD+ group had significantly higher levels of LDL– in the whole LDL fraction (7.66±1.92 vs. 5.14±0.84%, p=0.0003). Moreover the CAD+ group had significantly higher levels of total cholesterol (255.4±35.1 vs. 210.4±22.4?mg/dL), LDL cholesterol (154.5±26.9 vs. 122.4±21.1?mg/dL) and significantly lower levels of high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (40.4±9.4 vs. 51.0±11.5?mg/dL). LDL– remained significantly higher in the CAD+ group after adjustment for total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol (6.3 vs. 5.14% at p=0.0095). There is a trend towards a positive correlation between LDL– levels and LDL cholesterol in the control group (Spearman R=0.55 at p=0.098). Conclusions: Electronegatively charged LDL appears to be an additional hallmark of coronary artery disease, independently of established lipid risk factors. The trend towards a positive correlation between LDL cholesterol concentration and the level of LDL– in the control group may reflect the susceptibility of LDL cholesterol to autoxidation, Moreover, this may indicate other oxidative mechanisms in coronary artery disease. Nonetheless, further studies assessing the prognostic value of electronegatively charged LDLs are necessary.     

Lipid transfer protein activities in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.

BACKGROUND: Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis that may be due in part to dyslipidemia. The purpose of this study was to assess the regulatory role of lipid transfer proteins in the development of this dyslipidemia. METHODS: Activities of cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) and phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP), as well as lipid and protein components of the major lipoprotein fractions, were evaluated in probands with IGT and were compared with those in subjects with normal glucose tolerance. The effect of a fat-rich meal on these variables was also investigated. RESULTS: IGT probands had a higher triglyceride content in subfractions of low- (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). IGT patients had higher fasting CETP activity. The latter was positively correlated with HDL2 triglycerides and negatively with HDL3 total cholesterol. PLTP activity and mass were not higher in IGT patients. However, PLTP activity correlated with components of VLDL and LDL and was influenced by the type of obesity. Neither CETP and PLTP activities nor PLTP mass were altered by a fat-rich meal. PLTP and CETP activities correlated in both fasting and postprandial conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Increased fasting CETP activity may contribute to increased risk of atherosclerosis in subjects with IGT.     

Effect of melatonin on serum lipids in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Indirect evidence suggests that melatonin may lower serum cholesterol. We undertook a pilot study to assess the effect of melatonin on serum lipids in patients with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: Patients with a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level greater than 160 mg/dL despite a 3-month trial of a low-fat diet were enrolled. Patients were randomized in a single-blind, cross-over fashion to receive placebo, 0.3 mg melatonin, or 3 mg melatonin at bedtime for 6 weeks. Serum lipids (total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, LDL) were obtained at baseline and after each treatment arm. The means of the lipid components were compared between placebo and each active treatment arm. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the study. Five patients dropped out of the study, two because of side effects to melatonin and three because of protocol violations. There was no statistically significant difference in lipid components between placebo and both melatonin doses. There was a trend toward a decreased total cholesterol and LDL with the 3-mg dosage. Three patients had significant decreases in LDL on 3 mg melatonin. CONCLUSION: At the dosage studied, melatonin had no uniform effect on serum lipids in patients with hypercholesterolemia.     

Apolipoproteins as markers and managers of coronary risk

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Western communities. Reliable indices of coronary risk assessment and targets for drug treatment are important to the management of patients. Although plasma LDL cholesterol is well established as a predictor of CAD, it may not be the best circulatory marker. Results from recent epidemiological studies and statin trials suggest that apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB), with or without apoA-I, is superior to LDL cholesterol in predicting coronary events. Measurements of apolipoproteins are internationally standardized, automated, cost-effective and more convenient and precise than those for LDL cholesterol. ApoB may also be preferable to the measurement of non-HDL cholesterol. Measurement of apolipoproteins (apoB and possibly apoA-I) should be routinely added to the routine lipid profile (cholesterol, triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) to assess the atherogenic potential of lipid disorders. This is particularly relevant to dyslipidaemias characterized by an elevation in plasma triglycerides. Apolipoproteins, especially apoB, could also replace the standard "lipid profile" as a target for therapy in at-risk patients.     

Effects of atorvastatin 10 mg and fenofibrate 200 mg on the low-density lipoprotein profile in dyslipidemic patients: A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study

Background: Elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations are highly atherogenic, especially the small, dense LDL (sdLDL) species. Fenofibrate has been reported to shift the LDL profile by decreasing the sdLDL subfraction and increasing larger LDL subclasses. Atorvastatin, anantihyperlipidemic agent, has been reported to reduce plasma total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG) concentrations and thus could modify the LDL profile.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of fenofi brate and atorvastatin on standard lipid concentrations and the LDL profile.Methods: In this randomized, open-label, parallel-group study, men and women aged 18 to 79 years with type II primary dyslipidemia, defined as LDL-C ≥160 and TG 150 to 400 mg/dL, after a 4- to 6-week washout period while eating an appropriate diet, were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg once daily or fenofi-brate 200 mg once daily. Plasma lipid concentrations and cholesterol and apolipoprotein (apo) B (reflecting the LDL particle number) in each LDL subfraction prepared by ultracentrifiigation were determined at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Tolerability was assessed using adverse events (AEs) obtained on laboratory analysis and vital sign measurement. Adherence was assessed by counting unused drug supplies.Results: A total of 165 patients (117 men, 48 women; mean [SD] age, 50.1 [10.7] years; mean TC concentration, 289 mg/dL) were randomized to receive atorvastatin (n = 81) or fenofibrate (n = 84). Compared with fenofibrate, atorvastatin was associated with a significantly greater mean (SD) percentage decrease in TC (27.0% [12.3%] vs 16.5% [12.9%]; P < 0.001), calculated LDL-C (35.4% [15.8%] vs 17.3% [17.2%]; P < 0.001), TC/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (29.1% [16.3%] vs 22.9% [15.9%]; P = 0.001), and apoB (30.3% [12.7%] vs 19.6% [15.5%]; P < 0.001). Compared with atorvastatin, fenofibrate was associated with a significantly greater decrease in TG (37.2% [25.9%] vs 20.2% [27.3%]; P < 0.001) and a significantly greater increase in HDL-C concentration (10.4% [15.7%] vs 4.6% [12.1%]; P = 0.017). Fibrinogen concentration was significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.002); it was decreased with fenofibrate use (4.6% [23.7%]) and was increased with atorvastatin use (5.7% [23.5%]). Atorvastatin did not markedly affect the LDL distribution; it was associated with a homogeneous decrease in cholesterol and apoB concentrations in all subfractions, whereas fenofibrate was associated with a marked movement toward a normalized LDL profile, shifting the sdLDL subfractions toward larger and less atherogenic particles, particularly in those patients with baseline TG ≥200 mg/dL. No serious AEs related to the study treatments were reported. A total of 5 AEs were observed in 8 patients, including: abdominal pain, 3 patients (2 in the atorvastatin group and 1 in the fenofibrate group); abnormal liver function test results, 1 (fenofibrate); increased creatine Phosphokinase activity, 2 (atorvastatin); gastrointestinal disorders, 1 (fenofibrate); and vertigo, 1 (fenofibrate).Conclusion: In these dyslipidemic patients, fenofibrate treatment was associated with an improved LDL subfraction profile beyond reduction in LDL-C, particularly in patients with elevated TG concentration, whereas atorvastatin was associated with equally reduced concentrations of cholesterol and apoB in all LDL subfractions independent of TG concentrations.     

A 12-week, prospective, open-label analysis of the effect of rosuvastatin on triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism in patients with primary dyslipidemia

BACKGROUND: Although the effect of statins on lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been extensively studied, their hypotriglyceridemic capacity is not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: The present study examined clinical and laboratory factors potentially associated with the triglyceride (TG)-lowering effect of rosuvastatin. METHODS: Eligible patients had primary dyslipidemia and a moderate risk of heart disease. Patients were prescribed rosuvastatin 10 mg/d in an open-label fashion and kept 3-day food diaries. Laboratory measurements, performed at baseline and 12 weeks, included serum lipid parameters (total cholesterol [TC], TGs, LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], and apolipoprotein [apo] levels), non-lipid metabolic variables (including carbohydrate metabolism parameters and renal, liver, and thyroid function tests), and LDL-subfraction profile (by high-resolution 3% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). Tolerability was assessed at each visit. RESULTS: Participants were 75 hyperlipidemic patients (39 men and 36 women; mean age, 51.7 years). At 12 weeks, TC levels were reduced by 35.1% (P < 0.001), TGs by 15.2% (P < 0.001), LDL-C by 48.5% (P < 0.001), apoE by 35.4% (P < 0.001), and apoE by 17.3% (P < 0.001) from baseline, whereas HDL-C and apoA1 levels were not significantly changed. Stepwise linear regression analysis showed that baseline TG levels were most significantly correlated (R(2) = 42.0%; P < 0.001) with the TG-lowering effect of rosuvastatin, followed by the reduction in apoCIII levels (R(2) = 13.6%; P < 0.01). Rosuvastatin use was associated with a reduction in cholesterol mass of both large LDL particles (mean [SD], from 150.5 [36.6] to 90.5 [24.3] mg/dL; P < 0.001) and small, dense LDL (sdLDL) particles (from 11.5 [8.4] to 6.6 [4.5] mg/dL; P < 0.001). Rosuvastatin had no effect on cholesterol distribution of the LDL subfractions (mean [SD], large particles, from 90.8% [7.0%] to 91.8% [5.1%]; sdLDL, from 7.1% [4.7%] to 7.5% [4.8%]) or the mean LDL particle size (from 26.5 [4.2] to 26.6 [4.0] rim). A significant increase in mean LDL particle size after rosuvastatin treatment (mean [SD], from 26.4 [0.4] to 26.9 [0.4] rim; P = 0.02) was observed only in patients with baseline TG levels > or =120 mg/dL. No serious adverse events requiring study treatment discontinuation were reported. One patient who presented with headache and 2 patients who presented with fatigue quickly recovered without discontinuing rosuvastatin treatment. A posttreatment elevation in aminotransferase levels <3-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN) was recorded in 5 (6.7%) patients, and 2 (2.7%) patients experienced elevated creatine kinase concentrations <5-fold ULN. CONCLUSION: Baseline TG levels were the most important independent variable associated with the TG-lowering effect of rosuvastatin.