A clinical phase I study of an EB66 cell-derived H5N1 pandemic vaccine adjuvanted with AS03

BackgroundWe conducted a phase I clinical trial of a cell culture-derived AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccine containing HA antigen (A/Indonesia/05/2005(H5N1)/PR8-IBCDC-RG2) derived from EB66 cells (KD-295).MethodsHealthy male adult volunteers (20–40 years old, N = 60) enrolled in the study were divided into 3 groups, the MA group (3.8 μg of HA + AS03), HA group (7.5 μg of HA + AS03), and 1/2 MA group (half the volume of the MA group), and received KD-295 intramuscularly twice with a 21-day interval. After administration of KD-295, adverse events, clinical laboratory parameters, and immune response to the vaccine strain and heterologous virus strains were evaluated.ResultsNo severe adverse events leading to discontinuation of vaccine administration occurred. The vaccine was well-tolerated. There was no dose dependency in the rate, timing, or duration of the adverse events. Immunogenicity of the vaccines was evaluated by HI (hemagglutination inhibition) assay, which confirmed that the antibody response to the vaccine strain and heterologous strain in all groups met the three criteria for immunogenicity described in the Japanese guidelines for development of a pandemic prototype vaccine. We also measured the neutralizing antibody titers against several virus strains, and confirmed a significant rise in antibody levels to both the vaccine strain and heterologous strains.ConclusionThe EB66-derived H5N1 influenza vaccine adjuvanted with AS03 elicited a broad cross-reactive antibody response among H5N1 strains with acceptable reactogenicity. Therefore, KD-295 can be considered a useful pandemic and pre-pandemic influenza vaccine candidate.     

Immunogenicity and tolerability of an inactivated and adjuvanted pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine, in HIV-1-infected patients

We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of a single dose of the split virion AS03-adjuvanted pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine (A/California/7/2009) in 84 HIV-1 infected individuals. Antibody titers were determined by hemagglutination inhibition assay and by microneutralization. Vaccine was well tolerated. At 21 days post vaccination, 56 (67%) patients had seroconverted. There was no correlation between baseline CD4 cell count (p = 0.539) or HIV viral load (p = 0.381) and immune response. Other vaccine strategies should be evaluated in this HIV population, to improve response rates.     

The immunogenicity and reactogenicity profile of a candidate hepatitis B vaccine in an adult vaccine non-responder population

Approximately 5% of vaccinees display an inadequate response after the administration of the standard three dose hepatitis B vaccine. A new hepatitis B vaccine (HBsAg/AS04) formulated with the adjuvant AS04 which contains 3'-deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A (3D-MPL) and alum has been developed. AS04 enhances the immune response which may be beneficial to non-responders. In a single-blind, randomised study, we tested the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the new vaccine with that of commercially established hepatitis B vaccine, both on a 0, 1, 6 months schedule in 20-60 years old non-responders (titre <10 m IU/ml after four doses of hepatitis B vaccine). One month after the first dose the seroprotection rate was 44% for group 1 (58 subjects) receiving the established vaccine versus 66% for group 2 receiving HBsAg/AS04 (57 subjects) (P=0.03). One month after the second dose this was 58 and 81%, respectively (P<0.005) and 1 month after the third dose this was 68 and 98%, respectively (P<0.001). One month after each dose, GMTs were 34, 56 and 111 mIU/ml for group 1 versus 123222 and 1937 mIU/ml for the HBsAg/AS04 group (P<0.05, <0.01 and 0.0001, respectively). Pain at the injection site was the most commonly reported local symptom and very few symptoms were scored as severe. In this group of adult non-responders to previous hepatitis vaccination, the HBsAg/AS04 vaccine was well tolerated and induced, at all time-points, a superior immune response compared to the licensed hepatitis B vaccine.     

Immunogenicity,reactogenicity, and safety of inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine candidate versus inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in healthy adults aged ≥18 years: A phase III,randomized trial

Background

Two influenza B lineages have been co-circulating since the 1980s, and because inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) contains only one B strain, it provides little/no protection against the alternate B-lineage. We assessed a candidate inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) containing both B lineages versus TIV in healthy adults.

Methods

Subjects received one dose of QIV (lot 1, 2, or 3) or one of two TIVs (B strain from Victoria or Yamagata lineage); randomization was 2:2:2:1:1. Hemagglutination-inhibition assays were performed 21-days post-vaccination; superiority of QIV versus TIV for the alternate B-lineage was demonstrated if the 95% confidence interval (CI) lower limit for the GMT ratio was ≥1.5, and non-inferiority against the shared strains was demonstrated if the 95% CI upper limit for the GMT ratio was ≤1.5. Reactogenicity and safety were assessed during the post-vaccination period. NCT01196975.

Results

Immunogenicity of QIV lots was consistent, QIV was superior to TIV for the alternate B-lineage strain, and QIV was non-inferior versus TIVs for shared strains (A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B-strain). Reactogenicity and safety profile of the QIV was consistent with seasonal influenza vaccines.

Conclusion

QIV provided superior immunogenicity for the added B strain without affecting the antibody response to the TIV strains, and without compromising safety.     

Unadjuvanted pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine in HIV-1-infected adults

We evaluated the immune response to a 2009 influenza A (H1N1) unadjuvanted vaccine in HIV-infected patients and assessed the boosting effect of a second dose. HIV-infected adults were enrolled and scheduled to receive the H1N1 unadjuvanted vaccine containing 15 μg of A/California/7/2009 haemagglutinin. Anti-H1N1 antibody titers were measured at enrollment and 4-8 weeks after each vaccination by using haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and virus neutralization (NT) assays. One hundred and four patients were analyzed. Seroconversion, as measured by using HI and NT assays, was observed in 52 (50.0%) patients and 49 (47.1%) patients, respectively, after the first dose. Seroconversion rate evaluated by using NT, but not HI, antibody titers was associated with HIV RNA levels of <400 copies/ml (odds ratio, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.15-8.96). Other parameters, including CD4 cell count, were not associated with seroconversion. In a cohort that received two vaccine doses at a 4-8-week interval (n = 54), the seroconversion rate and geometric mean titer for HI antibodies were 44.4% (95% CI, 30.8-58.1%) and 30.5 (95% CI, 19.9-46.9) after the first dose, respectively, and 48.1% (95% CI, 34.4-61.9%) and 39.0 (95% CI, 26.1-58.2) after the second dose, respectively. Among HIV-infected patients, the seroconversion rate was around 50% after the first dose of unadjuvanted vaccine. A second dose of vaccine had a limited boosting effect on immunity in this patient cohort.     

Vaccination against highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus in zoos using an adjuvanted inactivated H5N2 vaccine

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus infections have recently caused unprecedented morbidity and mortality in a wide range of avian species. European Commission directive 2005/744/EC allowed vaccination in zoos under strict conditions, while reducing confinement measures. Vaccination with a commercial H5N2 vaccine with vaccine doses adapted to mean body weight per species was safe, and proved immunogenic throughout the range of species tested, with some variations between and within taxonomic orders. After booster vaccination the overall homologous geometric mean titre (GMT) to the vaccine strain, measured in 334 birds, was 190 (95% CI: 152-236), and 80.5% of vaccinated birds developed a titre of >or=40. Titres to the HPAI H5N1 virus followed a similar trend, but were lower (GMT: 61 (95% CI: 49-76); 61%>or=40). The breadth of the immune response was further demonstrated by measuring antibody titres against prototype strains of four antigenic clades of currently circulating H5N1 viruses. These data indicate that vaccination should be regarded as a beneficial component of the preventive measures (including increased bio-security and monitoring) that can be undertaken in zoos to prevent an outbreak of and decrease environmental contamination by HPAI H5N1 virus, while alleviating confinement measures.     

Immunogenicity and safety of an AS03-adjuvanted H5N1 pandemic influenza vaccine in Korean adults: A phase IV,randomized, open-label,controlled study

BackgroundAS03-adjuvanted H5N1 pandemic influenza vaccines have been assessed in an extensive clinical development program conducted in North America, Europe, and Asia including children from 6 months of age, adults, and elderly adults. We evaluated AS03-H5N1 in Korean adults 18 through 60 years of age.MethodsThis Phase IV, randomized, study was conducted to assess the immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of two doses (3.75 μg of hemagglutinin antigen) of A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) adjuvanted with AS03 given 21 days apart in Korean adults. Antibody responses were assessed using hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assays against the vaccine strain and a vaccine-heterologous strain (A/Vietnam/1194/2004) 21 days after the second dose. A control group (safety) received a licensed seasonal inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV). Reactogenicity was assessed for 7 days after each vaccination, and unsolicited adverse events were assessed for 182 days following vaccination in both study groups (NCT01730378).ResultsAS03-H5N1 was immunogenic and elicited robust HI antibody responses with seroconversion rates of 100% for the vaccine strain and 69.1% for the heterologous strain (N = 81). HI antibody responses fulfilled the European licensure criteria for immunogenicity (primary endpoint). The incidence of local and systemic solicited adverse events (reactogenicity) was higher with AS03-H5N1 than TIV. There was no apparent difference in the rate of unsolicited adverse events in the AS03-H5N1 and TIV groups.ConclusionThe results indicate that AS03-H5N1 vaccine is immunogenic with reactogenicity and safety findings that are consistent with the established profile of AS03-H5N1 vaccine.     

Clinical testing of an inactivated influenza A/H5N1 vaccine candidate in a double-blinded,placebo-controlled,randomized trial in healthy adults in Vietnam

We tested an inactivated egg-grown whole virus influenza A/H5N1 vaccine candidate developed by the Institute of Vaccines and Medical Biologicals (IVAC), a state-run vaccine manufacturer in Vietnam, in a Phase 1, placebo controlled, double blinded, randomized trial. The vaccine was adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide. The trial enrolled 75 subjects who were randomized to receive two injections of one of the following: low-dose of vaccine (7.5 mcg HA), high-dose of vaccine (15 mcg HA), or placebo. The vaccine candidate was well tolerated with minimal local reactogenicity consisting of mild, short-lived injection site pain and/or tenderness. No systemic reactogenicity was observed other than transient low-grade fever in about 13% of the subjects and no unsolicited adverse events were attributable to product administration. Immune responses were assessed at baseline and after the first and second dose by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and microneutralization (MN) assays, with 72% of the high-dose and 68% of the low-dose vaccine recipients presenting a ⩾4-fold response in the HAI assay and 72% of the high-dose and 61% of the low-dose vaccine recipients exhibiting a ⩾4-fold response in the MN assay. These promising results support further development. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02171819, June 20, 2014.     

An adjuvanted pandemic influenza H1N1 vaccine provides early and long term protection in health care workers

Mass vaccination was the most effective prophylaxis for protecting the population during the influenza H1N1 pandemic. We have evaluated the tolerability, immunogenicity and kinetics of the antibody response to a monovalent oil-in-water (AS03) adjuvanted human pandemic split influenza A/California/7/2009 H1N1 (3.75 μg haemagglutinin) vaccine in health care workers. Vaccination elicited a rapid and early protective level of haemagglutination inhibition antibody from 6 to 7 days post vaccination, and by 14 to 21 days post vaccination, up to 98% of vaccinees had protective antibody titres which persisted for at least 3 months in 84-92% of subjects. A rapid induction of protective antibody is important in reducing community spread of pandemic influenza and in helping maintain the integrity of the health care system during the pandemic.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a virus-like particle pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccine in a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adults in Mexico

Virus-like particles (VLPs) can be rapidly developed from influenza virus genetic sequences in order to supply vaccine after the onset of a pandemic. The safety and immunogenicity of one or two doses of a recombinant A (H1N1) 2009 influenza VLP vaccine was evaluated in a two-stage, Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in 4563 healthy adults, 18-64 years of age, during the H1N1 2009 pandemic in Mexico. In Part A, 1013 subjects were randomized into four treatment groups (5 μg, 15 μg, or 45 μg hemagglutinin [HA] VLP vaccine or placebo) and vaccinated 21 days apart, with sera collected on Days 1, 14 and 36 for hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) testing. After review of safety and immunogenicity data from Part A, additional subjects were immunized with a single dose of 15 μg VLP vaccine (N = 2537) or placebo (N = 1011) and assessed for safety in Part B. Results showed the H1N1 2009 VLP vaccine was safe and well-tolerated. Systemic solicited events were similar between placebo and VLP vaccinated groups with no vaccine-related serious adverse events. Dose response trends for solicited local adverse events were observed, with higher incidences of local pain, swelling, tenderness, and redness reported in the higher VLP dose groups (15 μg and 45 μg) compared to the placebo and 5 μg VLP groups following both vaccinations. Although the majority of local AEs were mild in severity, a dose trend in events of moderate or greater severity was also noted for these solicited events. The VLP vaccine groups demonstrated robust HAI immune responses after a single vaccination, with high rates of seroprotection (≥40 HAI titer) in 82-92% of all subjects and in 64-85% of subjects who were seronegative at the time of immunization. HAI geometric mean titers (GMTs), geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and seroconversion rates were also all statistically higher in the VLP groups compared to placebo for both post-baseline time points. Based on these data, additional clinical trials are in development to evaluate influenza vaccine candidate antigens manufactured using Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9)/baculovirus-based VLP technology.     

Phase I and II randomised trials of the safety and immunogenicity of a prototype adjuvanted inactivated split-virus influenza A (H5N1) vaccine in healthy adults

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a prototype inactivated, split-virus H5N1 (avian influenza A) vaccine. A secondary objective was to assess the cross-reactivity of immune responses to two variant clade 2 H5N1 strains. METHODS: In two randomised, dose comparison, parallel assignment, multicentre trials conducted in Australia, healthy adult volunteers received two doses of 7.5 microg or 15 microg H5 haemagglutinin (HA) vaccine+/-AlPO4 adjuvant (phase I trial; N=400) or two doses of 30 microg or 45 microg H5 HA with AlPO4 adjuvant (phase II trial; N=400). Revaccination with a booster dose was offered 6 months after dose 2 (phase I trial only). Main outcome measures were the change in immunogenicity at each follow-up visit from baseline, measured using HA inhibition (HI) and virus microneutralisation (MN) assays, and the frequency and nature of adverse events (AEs). Computer generated tables were used to randomly allocate treatments; participants and investigators were blinded to treatment allocation. FINDINGS: All formulations were well-tolerated; no unexpected serious adverse events were reported. Two doses of 30 microg or 45 microg H5 HA adjuvanted formulations elicited the highest immune responses, with considerable MN antibody (>or=1:20) persistence up to 6 months post-vaccination. The 7.5 and 15 microg formulations (+/-adjuvant) were less immunogenic than the higher dose formulations; HI and MN antibody titres decreased to near pre-vaccination levels at 6 months but were restored to post-dose 2 levels after the booster dose. Immune responses in the phase I trial demonstrated modest levels of cross-protective MN antibodies against two currently circulating, distinct clade 2 H5N1 strains. INTERPRETATION: Two doses of prototype 30 microg or 45 microg aluminium-adjuvanted, clade 1 H5N1 vaccines were immunogenic and well-tolerated with considerable 6-month antibody persistence. The prototype H5N1 vaccine also elicited modest levels of cross-protective MN antibodies against variant clade 2 H5N1 strains [ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00136331, NCT00320346; Funding: CSL Limited, Australia].     

Dose ranging of adjuvant and antigen in a cell culture H5N1 influenza vaccine: Safety and immunogenicity of a phase 1/2 clinical trial

Background

Dose-sparing strategies and new production technologies will be necessary to produce adequate supplies of vaccines for pandemic influenza. One approach is to include adjuvant, which can reduce the amount of antigen required for immunization and stimulate cross-reactive responses to drifted variants of novel viruses. Dose-sparing studies of adjuvant, itself a finite resource, have not previously been reported for H5N1 vaccine development.

Methodology/principal findings

A total of 753 healthy 18–40-year-old adults were randomized to one of 12 groups (N ∼ 60/group) to receive two intramuscular doses, 21 days apart, of 3.75, 7.5 or 15 μg of cell culture grown influenza A/H5N1 hemagglutinin (A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1)/PR-8-IBCDC-RG2), each dose level formulated with 0%, 25%, 50% or 100% of the MF59 dose contained in licensed influenza vaccine. 752 subjects actually received one dose, and 695 a second dose. Serum hemagglutination inhibition and neutralizing antibody levels, were determined before and 21 days after each dose. Safety and reactogenicity were assessed by self-completed diary cards. Nonadjuvanted H5N1 formulations were poorly immunogenic, but antibody responses were significantly enhanced by all doses of MF59 for each antigen level. The 3.75 μg H5N1 containing 50% MF59 satisfied the European criteria for pandemic vaccine licensure. All formulations were well tolerated, although MF59 dose-dependent increases in the frequency of injection site pain were observed. The frequencies of injection site and systemic reactions were lower after receipt of the second dose of vaccine. No vaccine-related SAE was reported.

Conclusions

Dose-sparing of both antigen and adjuvant is possible without compromising immunogenicity, while improving reactogenicity and is a promising strategy that will expand the availability of vaccines for global control of pandemic influenza.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine adjuvanted with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin: A phase 1 clinical trial

ObjectivesHydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CyD), an oligosaccharide used as an excipient in pharmaceutical preparation, was recently reported to function as a vaccine adjuvant to co-administered antigens. In this study, we investigated the safety and immunogenicity of a seasonal influenza vaccine adjuvanted with HP-β-CyD (FluCyD-vac) in healthy adults compared with those of a standard seasonal influenza vaccine (Flu-vac).MethodsWe conducted a single-blinded randomized phase 1 clinical trial study, and used two quadrivalent split seasonal influenza vaccines: FluCyD-vac containing 9 μg of HA/strain and 20% w/v of HP-β-CyD, and Flu-vac containing 15 μg of hemagglutinin (HA)/strain only. All participants were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of Flu/CyD-vac or Flu-vac at a ratio of 2:1. We assessed solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) and immune responses using hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers. In addition, we assessed T-cell function in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), after stimulation with HA vaccine strains, using flow cytometry.ResultsAmong 36 healthy volunteers enrolled in the study (FluCyD-vac, n = 24; Flu-vac, n = 12), FluCyD-vac was well tolerated. Most of the solicited AEs were mild local skin reactions at the injection site. No serious AEs were reported in either group. HI titers 21 days after vaccination with FluCyD-vac were comparable with those of Flu-vac and sufficient to meet international criteria, despite reduced HA antigen doses. When PBMCs were stimulated with the four HA antigens in the vaccine, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α-producing CD4⁺ T cells were enhanced in the FluCyD-vac group.ConclusionFluCyD-vac was well-tolerated and immunogenic, despite containing 40% less HA antigens than Flu-vac. This study showed that HP-β-CyD is a potentially safe, novel adjuvant for human influenza vaccine.Clinical trial registry: UMIN000028530.     

Safety and immunogenicity profile of an experimental hepatitis B vaccine adjuvanted with AS04

The reactogenicity and safety of an experimental hepatitis B (HB) vaccine containing adjuvant system (AS04) was compared with a licensed vaccine in a phase III, single-blind, randomised study in healthy volunteers ≥15 years of age. A total of 1303 subjects were enrolled to receive either two doses of HB-AS04 (0, 6 months) or three doses of the comparator vaccine (0, 1, 6 months). Two doses of HB-AS04 elicited seroprotection rates close to 100% and two-fold higher GMTs than the comparator vaccine. Results showed that both vaccines were well tolerated and the general safety profile of HB-AS04 was similar to that of the comparator vaccine.     

Safety and immunogenicity profile of an experimental hepatitis B vaccine adjuvanted with AS04

The reactogenicity and safety of an experimental hepatitis B (HB) vaccine containing adjuvant system (AS04) was compared with a licensed vaccine in a phase III, single-blind, randomised study in healthy volunteers >or=15 years of age. A total of 1303 subjects were enrolled to receive either two doses of HB-AS04 (0, 6 months) or three doses of the comparator vaccine (0, 1, 6 months). Two doses of HB-AS04 elicited seroprotection rates close to 100% and two-fold higher GMTs than the comparator vaccine. Results showed that both vaccines were well tolerated and the general safety profile of HB-AS04 was similar to that of the comparator vaccine.     

Safety and immunogenicity of three different formulations of an adjuvanted varicella-zoster virus subunit candidate vaccine in older adults: A phase II,randomized, controlled study

Background

This study investigated the safety and immunogenicity of different formulations and schedules of a candidate subunit herpes zoster vaccine containing varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E (gE) with or without the adjuvant system AS01_B.

Methods

In this phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled study, adults aged ≥60 years (N = 714) received one dose of 100 μg gE/AS01_B, two doses, two months apart, of 25, 50, or 100 μg gE/AS01_B, or two doses of unadjuvanted 100 μg gE/saline. Frequencies of CD4⁺ T cells expressing ≥2 activation markers following induction with gE were measured by intracellular cytokine staining and serum anti-gE antibody concentrations by ELISA.

Results

Frequencies of gE-specific CD4⁺ T cells were >3-fold higher after two doses of all gE/AS01_B formulations than after one dose of 100 μg gE/AS01_B or two doses of 100 μg gE/saline. Frequencies were comparable after two doses of 25, 50, or 100 μg gE/AS01_B. Serum anti-gE antibody concentrations were comparable after two doses of 50 or 100 μg gE/AS01_B and higher than in the other groups. Immune responses persisted for at least 36 months. Reactogenicities of all gE/AS01_B formulations were similar but greater than with gE/saline.

Conclusions

The three formulations of gE/AS01_B were immunogenic and well tolerated in adults aged ≥60 years. Two vaccinations with gE/AS01_B induced higher immune responses than one and the dose of gE impacted humoral but not cellular immune responses (NCT00434577).     

Characterization of an influenza A H5N2 reassortant as a candidate for live-attenuated and inactivated vaccines against highly pathogenic H5N1 viruses with pandemic potential

We generated a high-growth 7:1 reassortant (Len17/H5) that contained the hemagglutinin (HA) gene from non-pathogenic A/Duck/Potsdam/1402-6/86 (H5N2) virus and other genes from the cold-adapted (ca) attenuated A/Leningrad/134/17/57 (H2H2) strain. Len17/H5 demonstrated an attenuated phenotype in mice and did not infect chickens. Mice administered Len17/H5 either as a live-attenuated intranasal vaccine or as an inactivated intramuscular vaccine were substantially protected from lethal challenge with highly pathogenic A/Hong Kong/483/97 (H5N1) virus and were protected from pulmonary infection with antigenically distinct A/Hong Kong/213/2003 (H5N1) virus. The cross-protective effect correlated with the levels of virus-specific mucosal IgA and/or serum IgG antibodies. Our results suggest a new strategy of using classical genetic reassortment between a high-growth ca H2N2 strain and antigenically related non-pathogenic avian viruses to prepare live-attenuated and inactivated vaccines for influenza pandemic.     

Immunogenicity,reactogenicity and safety of 2 doses of an adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine administered 2, 6 or 12 months apart in older adults: Results of a phase III,randomized, open-label,multicenter study

BackgroundIn phase III trials, 2 doses of a herpes zoster (HZ) subunit vaccine (HZ/su; 50 µg varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E [gE] and AS01_B Adjuvant System) administered 2-months apart in older adults (≥50 and ≥70 years) demonstrated >90% efficacy in preventing HZ and had a clinically acceptable safety profile. Here we report immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety following administration of 2 HZ/su doses at intervals longer than 2 months.MethodsIn this Phase III, open-label trial conducted in the US and Estonia, 354 adults ≥50 years were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 2 HZ/su doses 2, 6, or 12 months apart. gE-specific humoral immune responses were evaluated at pre-vaccination, 1 and 12 months post-dose 2. Co-primary objectives were to compare immune responses to HZ/su 1 month post-dose 2 when given 6-months or 12-months apart to those administered 2-months apart. For each participant, safety information was collected from dose 1 to 12 months post-dose 2.Results346 participants completed the study and 343 were included in the according-to-protocol cohort for immunogenicity. One month post-dose 2, vaccine response rates were 96.5% (97.5% confidence interval [CI]: 90.4; 99.2) and 94.5% (97.5% CI: 87.6; 98.3) for the 0, 6- and 0, 12-month schedules, respectively, both schedules meeting the pre-defined criterion. Non-inferiority of anti-gE geometric mean concentrations was demonstrated for HZ/su administered on 0, 6-month compared to a 0, 2-month schedule; however, HZ/su administered on a 0, 12-month schedule did not meet the non-inferiority criterion. Injection site pain was the most commonly reported solicited adverse event (AE). 26 participants each reported at least 1 serious AE; none were assessed as related to vaccination.ConclusionsImmune responses to HZ/su administered at 0, 6-month were non-inferior to those elicited by a 0, 2-month schedule. HZ/su exhibited a clinically acceptable safety profile for all dosing intervals.Clinical Trials Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01751165).