Clinical associations of anti-CENP-B and anti-Scl70 antibody levels measured by multiplexed fluorescent microsphere immunoassay in systemic sclerosis

The aim of this study was to assess the association between anti-CENP-B and anti-Scl70 antibody levels, measured by multiplexed fluorescent microsphere immunoassay, and the clinical features in patients affected by systemic sclerosis. Clinical evaluation of 80 scleroderma patients was performed in order to evaluate disease activity and organ involvement. Scleroderma-specific autoantibodies were detected using multiplexed fluorescent microsphere immunoassay. Unexpectedly, 11 patients resulted positive for both anti-Scl70 and anti-CENP-B antibodies; six cases showed a weak positivity for one of the two autoantibodies and a stronger positivity for the other one; five cases showed an intense positivity for both autoantibodies. This latter subgroup was excluded from the analysis of the associations between autoantibody levels and the clinical features. In the anti-CENP-B positive patients higher antibody levels were associated with a less extensive skin involvement in comparison with the cases affected by a more extensive skin involvement (521 ± 208 vs 395 ± 166 U/ml, respectively, P 0.038). In the anti-Scl70 positive patients autoantibody levels were directly correlated with skin involvement (P 0.018), showing higher levels in patients with a more extensive skin involvement in comparison with cases characterized by less extensive skin involvement (734 ± 135 vs 490 ± 183 U/ml, respectively, P 0.001). The findings of our study supports the association between autoantibody profile and disease severity in systemic sclerosis. In particular high levels of anti-Scl70 antibodies are associated with a worse cutaneous involvement, while high levels of anti-CENP-B antibodies seem to have a protective effect on skin manifestations.     

Psoriasis onset during infliximab treatment: description of two cases

The authors describe two patients with no personal or family history of psoriasis who developed psoriatic lesions during infliximab treatment: a woman affected by seronegative rheumatoid arthritis and a man affected by ankylosing spondylitis.     

Influence of antibodies against infliximab and etanercept on the treatment effectiveness of these agents in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

We investigated the influence of antibodies against infliximab and etanercept on the serum trough levels of these agents and the influence of these antibodies on the effectiveness of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with these agents. Forty patients treated with infliximab for 54 weeks and 40 patients treated with etanercept for 32 weeks were enrolled. They were divided into responder and non-responder groups. Serum trough levels of and antibodies against these agents were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or radioimmunoassay. Of the 40 patients treated with infliximab, 14 (35%) had anti-infliximab antibodies. Serum trough levels were significantly lower in the non-responder group (14 patients) than in the responder group (26 patients) 6 weeks after initiation of infliximab (p < 0.05). Conversely, titers of anti-infliximab antibody were significantly higher in the non-responder group than in the responder group between 6 and 38 weeks after initiation of infliximab (p < 0.05). Anti-etanercept antibodies were not detected in any patients on etanercept. Serum trough levels of etanercept were not significantly different between the responder (31 patients) and non-responder groups (9 patients). It seems that the appearance of anti-infliximab antibodies might decrease infliximab serum concentrations and, thereby, reduce the agent’s effectiveness. The clinical efficacy of etanercept does not appear to be affected by the serum concentrations if it is administered at standard doses.     

Etanercept response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after secondary loss of efficacy of infliximab

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the effectiveness of half-dose administration of etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who exhibited secondary loss of efficacy of infliximab. Seventeen patients were administered 25 mg of etanercept once weekly for at least 1 year after secondary loss of efficacy of infliximab. The mean duration of treatment with infliximab was 32.5 ± 1.3 months. The patient cohort consisted of 3 males and 14 females, with a mean age of 56.3 ± 11.4 years and mean weight of 57.2 ± 10.9 kg. The mean duration of RA was 16.2 ± 10.9 years. The mean Disease Activity Score 28 was decreased significantly, from 5.8 at the initiation of infliximab therapy to 3.6 at the end of observation. There were no withdrawals due to adverse reactions during the study period, although in 2 subjects the agent was changed to tocilizumab due to lack of effect, one after 18 months and the other after 36 months, and 1 subject withdrew after 18 months for financial reasons. A good response can be expected to a half dose of etanercept in patients with secondary loss of efficacy of infliximab. Reduction of the patient’s cost burden also makes this a superior treatment.     

A novel method predicting clinical response using only background clinical data in RA patients before treatment with infliximab

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to generate a novel method for predicting the clinical response to infliximab (IFX), using a machine-learning algorithm with only clinical data obtained before the treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

Methods: We obtained 32 variables out of the clinical data on the patients from two independent hospitals. Next, we selected both clinical parameters and machine-learning algorithms and decided the candidates of prediction method. These candidates were verified by clinical variables on different patients from two other hospitals. Finally, we decided the prediction method to achieve the highest score.

Results: The combination of multilayer perceptron algorithm (neural network) and nine clinical parameters shows the best accuracy performance. This method could predict the good or moderate response to IFX with 92% accuracy. The sensitivity of this method was 96.7%, while the specificity was 75%.

Conclusions: We have developed a novel method for predicting the clinical response using only background clinical data in RA patients before treatment with IFX. Our method for predicting the response to IFX in RA patients may have advantages over the other previous methods in several points including easy usability, cost-effectiveness and accuracy.     

Safety and efficacy of CT-P13 in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in an extension phase or after switching from infliximab

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of CT-P13 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during long-term treatment or after switching from innovator infliximab (IFX).

Methods: Patients who completed 54 weeks of treatment in a phase I/II study (PI/II) received CT-P13 at an initial dose of 3?mg/kg at Week 62, with dose increases permitted up to 10?mg/kg. The primary endpoint was adverse event (AE) incidence.

Results: Thirty-four of 38 patients in the maintenance group and 29 of 33 in the switch group reported at least one AE. Safety profiles in both groups were similar to those in PI/II. Eleven of 28 patients who were positive for anti-drug antibodies (ADA) at Week 62 discontinued the study before Week 110. Forty-one of 43 ADA-negative patients remained negative, and 10 of 28 ADA-positive patients became negative during the study. The mean DAS28 (ESR) at Week 134 was 3.166 in the maintenance group and 3.955 in the switch group.

Conclusions: CT-P13 was well tolerated in patients who maintained the treatment after 54 weeks and in patients who switched to CT-P13 after 54 weeks of IFX treatment. The study also demonstrated a stable clinical efficacy of CT-P13 in RA patients.     

Clinically relevant radiographic progression in joint destruction in RA patients with abnormal MMP-3 or high levels of CRP despite 1-year treatment with infliximab

Objective: Identify the independently related factors of joint destruction progression in RA patients despite of infliximab treatment.

Methods: The subjects were cases who underwent infliximab treatment for one year or longer in our department (n?=?244). Patients in which modified total sharp score (mTSS), joint erosion (JE), and joint space narrowing (JSN) had advanced to the standard value (3.0) or more for one year were defined as mTSS- Clinically-Relevant-Rapid Progression (CRRP) (n?=?20), JE-CRRP (n?=?20), and JSN-CRRP (n?=?23), and the respective related factors at baseline and week 54 were defined by multiple logistic regression.

Results: The median disease duration was 24 months and median mTSS 9.0 at baseline. The median DAS28, CRP, and yearly progression of mTSS improved from 5.8 to 2.6, 1.2 to 0.1?mg/dL, and 4.4 to 0.0 point/year, respectively. The related factor in each of mTSS-CRRP, JE-CRRP, and JSN-CRRP was high CRP levels at baseline. At week 54, the related factor of mTSS-CRRP and JSN-CRRP was high MMP-3 titer; however, the related factor of JE-CRRP was high CRP levels.

Conclusion: High CRP levels at baseline were an independent predictive factor of joint destruction advancement during infliximab treatment. Moreover, it was believed that abnormal MMP-3 at week 54 was the index for mTSS and JSN advancement, while high CRP levels were the index for JE advancement.     

Comparison of in-office magnetic resonance imaging versus conventional radiography in detecting changes in erosions after one year of infliximab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare standard hand radiographs with in-office 0.2?T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in monitoring response to therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were receiving infliximab, to evaluate the frequency and location of erosions, and to determine if there were differences in outcome based on disease duration at baseline. Patients who satisfied the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA and were receiving infliximab therapy were evaluated with a baseline and 1-year follow-up MRI. Magnetic resonance images were interpreted by two blinded, board-certified radiologists. Bone erosions were identified as well-defined defects extending through the cortical margin. The mean age of the 48 patients was 58.5 years. The median infliximab dosage was 4?mg/kg. Baseline data showed that 41 patients had abnormal MRIs. The mean time between the baseline and follow-up MRI examinations was 10.5 months. Follow-up MRI revealed regression in 11 patients. Thirty-one patients had both MRIs and radiographs. Magnetic resonance imaging was approximately twice as sensitive as radiography in detecting erosions at baseline. In-office MRI was useful in monitoring disease response after the initiation of infliximab treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging is potentially a very valuable diagnostic tool and prognostic indicator for use in patients with RA.     

Comparison of in-office magnetic resonance imaging versus conventional radiography in detecting changes in erosions after one year of infliximab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The objective of this study was to compare standard hand radiographs with in-office 0.2 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in monitoring response to therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were receiving infliximab, to evaluate the frequency and location of erosions, and to determine if there were differences in outcome based on disease duration at baseline. Patients who satisfied the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA and were receiving infliximab therapy were evaluated with a baseline and 1-year follow-up MRI. Magnetic resonance images were interpreted by two blinded, board-certified radiologists. Bone erosions were identified as well-defined defects extending through the cortical margin. The mean age of the 48 patients was 58.5 years. The median infliximab dosage was 4 mg/kg. Baseline data showed that 41 patients had abnormal MRIs. The mean time between the baseline and follow-up MRI examinations was 10.5 months. Follow-up MRI revealed regression in 11 patients. Thirty-one patients had both MRIs and radiographs. Magnetic resonance imaging was approximately twice as sensitive as radiography in detecting erosions at baseline. In-office MRI was useful in monitoring disease response after the initiation of infliximab treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging is potentially a very valuable diagnostic tool and prognostic indicator for use in patients with RA.     

Efficacy of treatment intensification with adalimumab,etanercept and infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review of cohort studies with focus on dose

Objectives

To summarize the empirical evidence regarding the effect of treatment intensification on clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with one of the TNF-α-inhibitors, adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab.

Methods

A systematic search of the bibliographic databases Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane Central identifying articles concerning treatment with adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis exposed to dose increase or shortening of dosing intervals was performed. Longitudinal cohorts, both clinical trials and observational studies, were included. ACR and EULAR response criteria and DAS28 were the preferred outcome measures.

Results

Out of 1135 records, eleven studies were included in the final evidence synthesis. One article concerned all the three TNF-α-inhibitors, eight used infliximab, one adalimumab and one etanercept. According to GRADE, evidence was weakened in particular by the lack of control groups, and for treatment intensification with adalimumab and etanercept, no conclusions could be drawn. With infliximab, two trials of high quality revealed contradictory results, but six studies described an improved clinical outcome following intensified treatment strategies. Some studies (2/2) also indicated that for infliximab, frequency increase was superior to dose increase.

Conclusions

Available studies indicate that intensifying treatment with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients, preferably by increasing the frequency of drug administration, may lead to improved clinical outcome in some patients, but the evidence is weak. There is an urgent need for prospectively designed cohort studies to be able to draw a final conclusion.     

Cardiovascular morbidity and associated risk factors in Spanish patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases attending rheumatology clinics: Baseline data of the CARMA Project

ObjectiveTo establish the cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and associated risk factors for CV disease (CVD) in Spanish patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD) and unexposed individuals attending rheumatology clinics.MethodsAnalysis of data from the baseline visit of a 10-year prospective study [CARdiovascular in rheuMAtology (CARMA) project] that includes a cohort of patients with CIRD [rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)] and another cohort of matched individuals without CIRD attending outpatient rheumatology clinics from 67 hospitals in Spain. Prevalence of CV morbidity, CV risk factors, and systematic coronary risk evaluation (SCORE) assessment were analyzed.ResultsA total of 2234 patients (775 RA, 738 AS, and 721 PsA) and 677 unexposed subjects were included. Patients had low disease activity at the time of recruitment. PsA patients had more commonly classic CV risk factors and metabolic syndrome features than did the remaining individuals. The prevalence of CVD was higher in RA (10.5%) than in AS (7.6%), PsA (7.2%), and unexposed individuals (6.4%). A multivariate analysis adjusted for the presence of classic CV risk factors and disease duration revealed a positive trend for CVD in RA (OR = 1.58; 95% CI: 0.90–2.76; p = 0.10) and AS (OR = 1.77; 95% CI: 0.96–3.27; p = 0.07). Disease duration in all CIRD groups and functional capacity (HAQ) in RA were associated with an increased risk of CVD (OR = 2.15; 95% CI: 1.29–3.56; p = 0.003). Most patients had a moderate CV risk according to the SCORE charts.ConclusionsDespite recent advances in the management of CIRD, incidence of CVD remains increased in Spanish subjects with CIRD attending outpatient rheumatology clinics.     

An open-label pilot study of the effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and previous infliximab treatment: relationship to reasons for failure and anti-infliximab antibody status

This prospective open-label pilot study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab and the relationship to antibodies against infliximab (IFX) in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had been treated previously with IFX and experienced treatment failure owing to lack or loss of response or intolerance. Patients self-administered adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week for 16 weeks, followed by maintenance therapy for up to Week 56. Measures of effectiveness included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, 28-joint Disease Activity Score, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index. Serum IFX concentrations, human antichimeric antibody against IFX (HACA), adalimumab serum concentrations, antiadalimumab antibody, and safety also were assessed. Of the 41 enrolled patients, 37 completed 16 weeks and 30 completed 56 weeks of treatment. Patients experienced clinically meaningful improvements in all measures of RA activity, with greater response rates observed for patients who had experienced loss of initial response to or intolerance of IFX. At Week 16, 46% of patients achieved an ACR20 and 28% achieved an ACR50; 61% achieved an at least moderate and 17% achieved a good EULAR response. Clinical benefit was maintained through Week 56 in all effectiveness parameters. Baseline HACA status did not significantly impact effectiveness. No new safety signals were observed; neither former IFX intolerance status nor baseline HACA status had a clinically relevant impact on adverse event frequency or severity. Adalimumab was effective and well-tolerated in patients with RA who previously failed IFX therapy, irrespective of reason for discontinuation and of HACA status.     

Impact of trough serum level on radiographic and clinical response to infliximab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the RISING study

Abstract

This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of 10 mg/kg infliximab with those of 3 mg/kg infliximab treatment in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients. After the patients received 3 mg/kg infliximab infusion at weeks 0, 2, and 6, they were randomly assigned to be administered 3, 6 or 10 mg/kg infliximab every 8 weeks from week 14 to 46. Mean American College of Rheumatology improvement (ACR-N) at week 54, the primary endpoint, was 51.3% and 58.3% for the 3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg groups, respectively, with a statistically significant difference. Treatment with 10 mg/kg was found to be remarkably beneficial in patients who had not responded to three infusions with 3 mg/kg at week 10. The median changes in the modified Sharp score were 0.0 in the two groups. There were no significant differences in the incidences of adverse events between the groups. In patients who achieved better clinical response or greater inhibition of progression of joint damage, trough serum infliximab level was significantly higher than in patients who did not. The magnitudes of both efficacies were correlated with the trough serum infliximab level (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00691028).     

Improvement of the HAQ score by infliximab treatment in patients with RA: its association with disease activity and joint destruction

Abstract

We conducted a two-year prospective study to clarify the efficacy of infliximab at improving the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score and associated factors in 67 patients with advanced rheumatoid arthritis (RA). All patients were scheduled to receive infliximab at a dose of 3 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 6 and every eight weeks thereafter through to week 102, and were fully examined at the time of each infusion. Parameters of disease activity such as the serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP), the serum level of matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) and the 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) were obtained, and the functional capabilities of the patients were assessed using the HAQ score. The serum CRP, the MMP-3, the DAS28(CRP) level, and the mean HAQ score decreased rapidly at two weeks after the start of infliximab treatment (CRP from 3.7 to 0.9 mg/dl, MMP-3 from 362.3 to 192.8 ng/ml, DAS28(CRP) from 5.6 to 3.7, and HAQ score from 1.5 to 0.9). Compared with the baseline values, the mean progression of the modified van der Heijde (vdH)–Sharp score after one year was 4.4 ± 5.8 (median: 3.0), and that after two years was 3.1 ± 6.9 (median: 1.0). A 93% reduction in the rate of joint destruction, as measured using the vdH–Sharp score, was estimated after infliximab therapy. Patients with less joint damage (shorter disease duration or lower vdH–Sharp score) regained more of their daily activities. The present study demonstrated the importance of activity control before the progression of irreversible factors, such as joint destruction, for maintaining the functional capacities of RA patients.     

Improvement of the HAQ score by infliximab treatment in patients with RA: its association with disease activity and joint destruction

We conducted a two-year prospective study to clarify the efficacy of infliximab at improving the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score and associated factors in 67 patients with advanced rheumatoid arthritis (RA). All patients were scheduled to receive infliximab at a dose of 3 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 6 and every eight weeks thereafter through to week 102, and were fully examined at the time of each infusion. Parameters of disease activity such as the serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP), the serum level of matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) and the 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) were obtained, and the functional capabilities of the patients were assessed using the HAQ score. The serum CRP, the MMP-3, the DAS28(CRP) level, and the mean HAQ score decreased rapidly at two weeks after the start of infliximab treatment (CRP from 3.7 to 0.9 mg/dl, MMP-3 from 362.3 to 192.8 ng/ml, DAS28(CRP) from 5.6 to 3.7, and HAQ score from 1.5 to 0.9). Compared with the baseline values, the mean progression of the modified van der Heijde (vdH)–Sharp score after one year was 4.4 ± 5.8 (median: 3.0), and that after two years was 3.1 ± 6.9 (median: 1.0). A 93% reduction in the rate of joint destruction, as measured using the vdH–Sharp score, was estimated after infliximab therapy. Patients with less joint damage (shorter disease duration or lower vdH–Sharp score) regained more of their daily activities. The present study demonstrated the importance of activity control before the progression of irreversible factors, such as joint destruction, for maintaining the functional capacities of RA patients.     

Differences between the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and the modified HAQ (mHAQ) score before and after infliximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

We conducted a 1-year prospective study to clarify differences between the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) and the modified HAQ (mHAQ) score among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with infliximab. A total of 87 patients were scheduled to receive infliximab infusion at a dose of 3 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter for 54 weeks; all patients received a full examination at each infusion appointment. The 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) and functional capability of each patient was assessed at each visit, using the HAQ-DI and the mHAQ score. A strong correlation was observed between the HAQ-DI and the mHAQ score at baseline (r = 0.892). Over the course of the treatment, the mean mHAQ score changed similarly to the HAQ-DI, but the mean HAQ-DI was significantly higher than the mean mHAQ score at each time-point (for the HAQ-DI vs. mHAQ score, baseline: 1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 0.9 ± 0.6, p < 0.0001; 6 weeks: 1.1 ± 0.7 vs. 0.6 ± 0.5, p < 0.0001; 30 weeks: 1.0 ± 0.7 vs. 0.6 ± 0.5, p < 0.0001; 54 weeks: 0.9 ± 0.7 vs. 0.6 ± 0.6, p = 0.0006). In the categories of “eating”, “reaching”, and “other activities”, the scores for several items excluded from the mHAQ score were significantly higher than those included in the mHAQ score over the year-long study period. We identified items contributing to significant differences between the HAQ-DI and the mHAQ score among RA patients treated with infliximab.     

Efficacy and safety of single-dose mizoribine for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results at 6 months after switching from a multiple-dose regimen without a change in total daily dose

Abstract

To determine the efficacy and safety of single-dose mizoribine (MZR) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a 6-month, single-arm, open-label, prospective observation study was performed. In patients who had been taking MZR at 100–150 mg/day in 2–3 divided portions continuously for at least 3 months, and who had shown a lack of clinical response, or escape (defined as a lack of response at the time of switching, even if some form of response had been shown before that), multiple-dose administration was switched to single-dose administration without changing the total daily dose. Efficacy was assessed in terms of the disease activity score, using the 28-joint count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS 28-ESR). Of the 34 enrolled patients, 28 met all the eligibility criteria and were assessed for efficacy, and finally 26 patients were able to receive the single-dose regimen throughout the full 6 months. The DAS28-ESR showed a significant decrease from 2 months after switching, and 46.4% of the 28 patients finally achieved a good or moderate response (3 and 10 patients, respectively). With regard to safety, no serious adverse events were observed. In conclusion, the administration of MZR at 100 or 150 mg in a single dose is thought to be a useful alternative form of MZR therapy.     

Subcutaneous administration of methotrexate at high doses makes a better performance in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis compared with oral administration of methotrexate: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesThis study was conducted to determine whether subcutaneous (SC) methotrexate (MTX) makes better performance on bioavailability, clinical efficiency, side effects occurrence, and treatment failure in the treatment of RA compared with oral MTX.MethodsThe databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Seven studies involving 1335 patients were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. The outcomes of meta-analysis were presented as mean difference (MD) or odd ration (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).ResultsMeta-analysis showed that SC MTX can significantly increase the AUC_0−t (area under plasma concentration curve from administration to last observed concentration at time t) (MD = 506.84; 95% CI: 80.80–932.89), shorten the time to reach maximum observed concentration (T_max) (MD = −0.13; 95% CI: −0.25 to −0.01) and the apparent terminal elimination half-life (t^1/2) (MD = −0.39; 95% CI: −0.70 to −0.08), reduce the occurrence of nausea (OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.28–0.97) and diarrhea (OR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.20–0.95), improve the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) (OR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.09–2.61) and ACR70 (OR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.02–2.26), and relieve the pain (MD = −0.65; 95% CI: −0.93 to −0.37) compared with oral MTX. However, the differences in maximum plasma concentration (C_max), the occurrence of headache, vomiting and dyspepsia, ACR50, treatment failure were not significant between the two groups.ConclusionSC route of MTX at high doses made better performance on improving the bioavailability and clinical efficacy, reducing the GI disorders, but it cannot decrease the treatment failure when compared with oral administration of MTX.     

Simplified Disease Activity Index remission at month 6 is an independent predictor of functional and structural remissions at month 12 during abatacept treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A multi-center,prospective cohort study in Japan

Objective: To evaluate association of clinical remission at month 6 with functional and structural remissions at month 12 during abatacept treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: This 12-month prospective, multicenter cohort study enrolled 168 patients with RA who started abatacept. Outcomes were assessed using composite measures, quality of life indices, and the van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score (mTSS). The logistic regression analysis was applied to identify factors associated with outcomes and their odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Results: At month 6 and 12, 21.4% and 26.2% of the patients achieved Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission (SDAI <3.3), and 40.6% and 41.7% achieved Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI <0.5) remission. Among 129 patients whose mTSS progression was evaluated at month 12, 83 (64.3%) achieved structural remission (ΔmTSS ≤0.5 for 12 months). SDAI remission at month 6 was identified as a significant predictor of both functional (OR, 3.732; 95% CI, 1.328–10.489) and structural remissions (OR, 4.301; 95% CI, 1.298–14.243) at month 12 after adjusting for covariates.

Conclusions: Aiming for SDAI remission at month 6 is an appropriate strategy to obtain good functional and structural outcomes at month 12.