Phase 1 Trial Evaluating Vorinostat Plus Bortezomib,Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

IntroductionBortezomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD) is a standard induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Given preclinical and clinical data suggesting the synergistic activity of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat with both bortezomib and lenalidomide for the treatment of multiple myeloma, we hypothesized that adding vorinostat to VRD (R2V2) would increase the rate and the quality of responses to induction treatment. Here we report the results of a phase 1 trial (NCT01038388) evaluating R2V2 as up-front treatment for NDMM patients.Patients and MethodsR2V2 was tested as induction therapy in a dose-escalation phase 1 study in 30 NDMM patients deemed eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. Treatment consisted of 4 induction cycles with R2V2, followed by either autologous stem-cell transplantation or 4 additional R2V2 cycles and lenalidomide maintenance therapy.ResultsThe maximum tolerated dose of vorinostat was 200 mg daily. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (87%), fatigue and peripheral neuropathy (60%), and thrombocytopenia (33%). R2V2 induced an objective response in 96% of patients, with 48% obtaining at least a complete remission. Median progression-free survival was 52 months, with 77% of patients alive at 5 years.ConclusionR2V2 as induction treatment for NDMM patients resulted in remarkable response rates at the cost of increased toxicity.     

Daratumumab Plus Carfilzomib,Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundCombination therapy regimens containing a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and a steroid are an established standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) regardless of transplant eligibility. Triplet regimens that include lenalidomide/dexamethasone combined with daratumumab or carfilzomib are highly active in multiple myeloma, including NDMM. The aim of this open-label, phase 1b study was to evaluate daratumumab in combination with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-KRd) in patients with NDMM.Patients and MethodsPatients (n = 22), regardless of transplant eligibility, received treatment with D-KRd for up to thirteen 28-day cycles or until autologous stem cell transplant. The first daratumumab dose was administered as a split infusion (8 mg/kg on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1). The primary end point was safety and tolerability.ResultsA total of 10 patients discontinued treatment, most frequently because of elective autologous stem cell transplant (n = 8). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (any grade; grade 3/4) were diarrhea (68%; 18%), lymphopenia (64%; 59%), cough (59%; 5%), and upper respiratory tract infection (55%; 0%). Stem cell collection was successful in most patients (91%). Daratumumab infusion–related reactions occurred in 9 (41%) patients, primarily during the first infusion, and were mild in severity (no grade 3/4 events). The best overall response rate was 95%, including 86% with a very good partial response or better and 67% with a complete response or better.ConclusionD-KRd was well tolerated, and encouraging efficacy results support further investigation of daratumumab-based quadruplet therapies for NDMM.     

Longitudinal Real-World Neuropathy and Patient-Reported Outcomes With Bortezomib and Lenalidomide in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundPeripheral neuropathy is a common treatment-emergent side effect during the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Although bortezomib is most commonly implicated, real-world data suggest that lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may also contribute to neuropathy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).MethodsThe Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) CoMMpass Registry was queried for all patients who received frontline VRd or bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCd). Incidence of neuropathy and patient-reported HRQoL outcomes over the first 12 months after diagnosis were compared between patients receiving VRd or VCd with or without early ASCT before 6 months.ResultsThere were 368 and 191 patients treated with VRd and VCd, respectively. VRd with early ASCT was associated with worse grade 1 neuropathy compared to VRd without early ASCT, as well as compared to VCd with early ASCT. There were no differences in neuropathy between VRd and VCd without early ASCT, and no differences in grade ≥2 neuropathy. There were significant improvements in HRQoL between baseline and 12 months in both VRd and VCd cohorts, regardless of early ASCT. Development of neuropathy was not associated with decrements in progression-free survival or overall survival.ConclusionsIn this longitudinal database analysis, there were no differences in grade ≥2 neuropathy between VRd and VCd frontline induction, and overall HRQoL significantly improved across all cohorts. However, differences in grade 1 neuropathy between VRd and VCd induction suggest that lenalidomide and high-dose melphalan may augment the risk of neuropathy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.     

Daratumumab,Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma: Three-year Follow-up of CASTOR

BackgroundIn the phase III CASTOR study in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-Vd) demonstrated significant clinical benefit versus Vd alone. Outcomes after 40.0 months of median follow-up are discussed.Patients and MethodsEligible patients had received ≥ 1 line of treatment and were administered bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²) and dexamethasone (20 mg) for 8 cycles with or without daratumumab (16 mg/kg) until disease progression.ResultsOf 498 patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (D-Vd, n = 251; Vd, n = 247), 47% had 1 prior line of treatment (1PL; D-Vd, n = 122; Vd, n = 113). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged with D-Vd versus Vd in the ITT population (16.7 vs. 7.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.40; P < .0001) and the 1PL subgroup (27.0 vs. 7.9 months; HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15-0.32; P < .0001). In lenalidomide-refractory patients, the median PFS was 7.8 versus 4.9 months (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28-0.68; P = .0002) for D-Vd (n = 60) versus Vd (n = 81). Minimal residual disease (MRD)–negativity rates (10⁻⁵) were greater with D-Vd versus Vd (ITT: 14% vs. 2%; 1PL: 20% vs. 3%; both P < .0001). PFS2 was significantly prolonged with D-Vd versus Vd (ITT: HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.38-0.61; 1PL: HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.51; P < .0001). No new safety concerns were observed.ConclusionAfter 3 years, D-Vd maintained significant benefits in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma with a consistent safety profile. D-Vd provided the greatest benefit at first relapse and increased MRD-negativity rates.     

Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in Transplant-Eligible Patients

Treatment of myeloma has changed significantly in the past decade as a result of better understanding of disease biology, more effective treatments, and improved supportive care. Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an effective treatment for myeloma and remains a critical component in its management. Given the potential impact of therapy on stem cell collection, initial treatment decisions in myeloma still depend on the patient’s transplant eligibility. The goals of initial therapy remain rapid disease control allowing for reversal of disease complications, as well as reduction in the risk of early death—all with minimal toxicity. The introduction of new drugs such as thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide has enabled us to achieve this goal, and combinations of these drugs have also led to unprecedented response depth. In addition, the newer drugs are being explored as maintenance therapy following SCT. This review summarizes the current approach to the treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma in transplant-eligible patients.     

偏小剂量的硼替佐米联合地塞米松治疗初发多发性骨髓瘤疗效观察

目的每次1.75 mg(0.8～1.0 mg/m2)的硼替佐米联合地塞米松对初发多发性骨髓瘤疗效观察。方法17例初发患者接受硼替佐米+地塞米松的方案治疗。硼替佐米每次1.75 mg(0.8～1.0 mg/m2),第1、4、8、11天,3～5秒内静脉推注完成;地塞米松20 mg/d,第1、2、4、5、8、9、11、12天静脉滴注,同时地塞米松0.75mg/d,口服,第1～12天。21天为1个疗程。完成4个疗程。结果完成4个疗程偏小剂量硼替佐米结合地塞米松治疗的初发多发性骨髓瘤患者的有效率为88.23%。高于传统VAD化疗方案的有效率(44.74%),且两者有统计学差异;不低于推荐剂量(1.3 mg/m2)的硼替佐米方案治疗的有效率。结论偏小剂量硼替佐米联合地塞米松对初发多发性骨髓瘤治疗仍有较好疗效,但其对疗效维持的长久性尚需进一步随访观察。     

Prognostic Value of Serum Paraprotein Response Kinetics in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

IntroductionResponse kinetics is a well-established prognostic marker in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The situation is not clear in multiple myeloma (MM) despite having a biomarker for response monitoring (monoclonal component [MC]).Materials and MethodsWe developed a mathematical model to assess the prognostic value of serum MC response kinetics during 6 induction cycles, in 373 NDMM transplanted patients treated in the GEM2012Menos65 clinical trial. The model calculated a “resistance” parameter that reflects the stagnation in the response after an initial descent.ResultsTwo patient subgroups were defined based on low and high resistance, that respectively captured sensitive and refractory kinetics, with progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years of 72% and 59% (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.93; P = .02). Resistance significantly correlated with depth of response measured after consolidation (80.9% CR and 68.4% minimal residual disease negativity in patients with sensitive vs. 31% and 20% in those with refractory kinetics). Furthermore, it modulated the impact of reaching CR after consolidation; thus, within CR patients those with refractory kinetics had significantly shorter PFS than those with sensitive kinetics (median 54 months vs. NR; P = .02). Minimal residual disease negativity abrogated this effect. Our study also questions the benefit of rapid responders compared to late responders (5-year PFS 59.7% vs. 76.5%, respectively [P < .002]). Of note, 85% of patients considered as late responders were classified as having sensitive kinetics.ConclusionThis semi-mechanistic modeling of M-component kinetics could be of great value to identify patients at risk of early treatment failure, who may benefit from early rescue intervention strategies.     

Clinical Study of Thalidomide Combined with Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Objective: To investigate the relationship between the efficacy and safety of different doses of thalidomide(Thal) plus dexamethasone (Dex) as the initial therapy in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiplemyeloma (MM). Methods: Clinical data of 28 elderly patients with newly diagnosed MM who underwent theTD regimen as the initial therapy were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groupsaccording to the maximal sustained dose of Thal: lower dose (group A) and higher dose (group B). The overallresponse rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AES) werecompared between the two groups. Results: A total of 28 patients were followed up with a median of 18 months.The ORR was 60.1%. The median response time and PFS were 2.0 and 17.0 months, respectively. The meansustained dose of Thal in group B was significantly higher than group A (292.9 mg v 180.4 mg, P=0.01). Therewas no significantly difference in ORR (57.1% v 64.3%, P=1.00) and PFS (9.63months v 17.66 months, P=0.73)between groups A and B. During the follow up, only five patients died (<40%) and, therefore, median OS valueswere not available. It is estimated, however, that the mean survival time in the two groups was 35.6 and 33.4months (P>0.05), respectively. All of the patients tolerated the treatment well. The incidence of AES in patientswith a grading above 3 in group B was significantly higher than in group A (P=0.033). Conclusions: The TDregimen results in a high response rate and manageable AES as the initial therapy in elderly patients with MM.TD should be considered as the front line regimen for the treatment of elderly patients with MM in areas withfinancial constraints. The clinical response can be achieved at a low dose Thal with minimal toxicity.     

Tolerance,Kinetics, and Depth of Response for Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib Combination in Chinese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Background

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is an important toxicity that limits the use of bortezomib (Btz). Attempts to reduce PN have included its subcutaneous (SC) administration.

Daratumumab,Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Chinese Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Analysis of LEPUS

BackgroundIn the phase 3 LEPUS study, daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-Vd) demonstrated significant clinical benefit versus Vd alone in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we report updated efficacy and safety results from LEPUS.Patients and MethodsChinese patients with ≥ 1 prior line of therapy were randomized 2:1 to bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²) and dexamethasone (20 mg) for eight cycles ± daratumumab (16 mg/kg) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsIn total, 211 patients were randomized to D-Vd (n = 141) or Vd (n = 70). At a 25.1-month median follow-up, D-Vd prolonged PFS versus Vd (median, 14.8 vs. 6.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.51; P < .00001). PFS benefit of D-Vd versus Vd was maintained across prespecified subgroups, including patients with prior bortezomib (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.53), patients who were refractory to last prior line of therapy (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.65), and patients with high-risk cytogenetics (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.71). Overall response rate (84.7% vs.66.7%; P = .00314) and rates of very good partial response or better (71.5% vs. 34.9%; P < .00001) and complete response or better (40.1% vs 14.3%; P = .00016) were higher with D-Vd versus Vd. No new safety concerns were identified.ConclusionsIn this updated analysis, D-Vd maintained significant efficacy benefits versus Vd alone and demonstrated a consistent safety profile, further supporting the use of D-Vd as a standard of care in Chinese patients with RRMM.     

Bortezomib,Melphalan, and Prednisone With or Without Daratumumab in Transplant-ineligible Asian Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Phase 3 OCTANS Study

IntroductionIn the global phase 3 ALCYONE trial, daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) improved outcomes versus VMP in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Here, we report the primary analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS trial of D-VMP versus VMP in transplant-ineligible Asian NDMM patients.Patients and MethodsIn total, 220 patients were randomized (2:1) to receive 9 cycles of VMP (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² subcutaneously twice weekly in Cycle 1 and weekly in Cycles 2 to 9; melphalan 9 mg/m² orally; and prednisone 60 mg/m² orally on Days 1 to 4 of each cycle) ± daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously weekly in Cycle 1, every 3 weeks in Cycles 2 to 9, and every 4 weeks thereafter until disease progression.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 12.3 months, very good partial response or better rates (primary endpoint) were 74.0% versus 43.2% with D-VMP versus VMP (odds ratio, 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.99-6.43; P < .0001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) with D-VMP versus VMP was not reached versus 18.2 months (hazard ratio, .43; 95% CI, .24-.77; P = .0033); 12-month PFS rates were 84.2% versus 64.6%. The most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events with D-VMP/VMP were thrombocytopenia (46.5%/45.1%), neutropenia (39.6%/50.7%), and leukopenia (31.3%/36.6%).ConclusionD-VMP demonstrated a favorable benefit/risk profile in transplant-ineligible Asian NDMM patients. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03217812.     

Adherence to Lenalidomide in Older Adults With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

IntroductionOne of the most common orally administered antimyeloma agents, lenalidomide, has significantly improved outcomes in multiple myeloma, including in older patients. However, despite its utilization and cost, the rates and factors related to adherence to lenalidomide in older adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma remain unknown.Patients and MethodsData were collected from adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma over age 65 years being treated with lenalidomide therapy between the years 2007 and 2014 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked databases. Adherence was measured as medication possession ratio (MPR), which was defined as the ratio of the number of days the patient had pills in their possession to the number of days in the observation period in the first year after myeloma diagnosis. MPR of < 90% was considered poor adherence.ResultsA total of 793 patients were included in the analysis. The mean MPR in our cohort was 89.5 ± 9.3%. Overall, 38% (n = 302) of the patients were considered to have poor adherence. Factors associated with poor adherence included increasing age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.03 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.05; P = .024), black race (aOR = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.08-2.73; P = .022), and polypharmacy (aOR = 1.04 per medication; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .008).ConclusionOver a third of older adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were considered to have poor adherence to lenalidomide, using the MPR as a surrogate for adherence. This highlights the need to further understand factors and devise strategies to support adherence in this patient cohort.     

Lack of Renal Recovery Predicts Poor Survival in Patients of Multiple Myeloma With Renal Impairment

BackgroundRenal impairment (RI) confers a poor prognosis in multiple myeloma. Reversibility of renal function is associated with improved survival in such patients. Patients in developing countries often present at an advanced stage and renal impairment is present in up to 40% of patients at diagnosis. We studied the renal outcome and survival of these patients with bortezomib-based induction therapy.Materials and MethodsIt was a single-center prospective study in a tertiary care multi-specialty institute in patients of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who presented with RI from July 2018 to December 2019. The diagnosis of multiple myeloma was made based on IMWG14 criteria. All patients received bortezomib and or immunomodulatory drug-based triplet or quadruplet induction therapy. Hematological and renal outcomes were assessed as per IMWG 2016 criteria.ResultsAmong 216 consecutive patients of NDMM, RI was seen in 91 (42.2%) patients. The median age of 91 patients was 60 years. (range- 32-80 years). Light chain myeloma was seen in 26% (n = 24) of patients. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 15.36 mL/min (3.1-38 mL/min) and a majority of patients were in the advanced ISS stage. (ISS III = 85.7%). Thirty-six (39.5%) patients received hemodialysis at presentation. Renal response was seen in 67 (73%) patients and 20 (out of 36; 55%) became dialysis independent over a median time of 38 days (Range 15-160 days). At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, 30 (33%) patients had died, of which, 14 (15.4%) patients had early mortality (within 2 months of diagnosis). Presence of light chain myeloma and cast nephropathy (definite or probable) were identified as independent predictors of poor renal recovery on multivariate analysis. (HR = 2.841; 95% CI [1.471-5.486], P = .002 for light chain myeloma; HR = 1.859; 95% CI (1.087-3.180); P = .024 for cast nephropathy) Patients with low eGFR at presentation (<12.5 mL/min) were more likely to have persistent renal insufficiency. (HR-3.521; 95% CI (1.856-6.679), P = .000). Patients who attained sustained renal recovery had improved survival as compared to patients in whom renal function failed to improve. (median OS- not reached vs. 8.3 months, P = .000) Achievement of hematological response and independence from hemodialysis was associated with improved survival on multivariate analysis.ConclusionRenal impairment was reversible in almost three-fourths of NDMM patients. achievement of hematological response and hemodialysis independence were independent predictors of improved overall survival in NDMM patients with RI.     

Weekly Bortezomib,Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin,and Dexamethasone Is a Safe and Effective Therapy for Elderly Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundThe synergic, additive effect of bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has never been tested in an elderly group of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM).Patients and Methods:In this study, 25 patients with a median age of 75 years were treated with bortezomib at usual doses of 1.3 mg/m² every 21 days. After 2 cycles, bortezomib was given intravenously (I.V.) weekly every 32 days. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m² I.V. was given on day 4 for 2 cycles and then was given on day 8. Dexamethasone 40 mg I.V. was given on days 1-4 for 2 cycles and then 20 mg weekly.Results:Bortezomib/PLD/dexamethasone therapy resulted in 20 of 25 objective responses for an overall response rate of 80% (complete remission + very good partial remission, 66%). Median overall survival was not reached. Median duration of response (progression-free survival) was 8 months. Eleven of 16 patients (68%) with ≥ VGPR still maintain a response at a median of 12 months versus 4 months for patients with < VGPR (PFS, overall survival; P = .0001). Grade 3/4 toxicities were mild in most of the patients.ConclusionBortezomib/PLD/dexamethasone combination is safe and effective in elderly patients with resistant-relapsing MM.     

Undertreatment of Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Therapies

Background

With the expanding armamentarium of therapeutic agents for multiple myeloma (MM), it is important to identify any undertreated patient populations to mitigate outcome disparities.

Induction Treatment With Cyclophosphamide,Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Phase II Study

Background:Thalidomide has alternative mechanisms of action; it can be combined with dexamethasone or alkylating agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM); however, the optimal doses and appropriate intervals of thalidomide continue to be debated.Patients and Methods:We assessed the clinical efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed MM; 68 patients were treated with pulsed cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) chemotherapy for induction treatment.Results:After a median of 28 months' follow-up, the overall response rate was 79.4%, with a 42.6% complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR). Patients with cytogenetically high-risk disease had poor CR/VGPR rates (27.3%) at a median of 11.5 months of time to progression (TTP) compared with patients with standard-risk disease who achieved CR/VGPR rates (50%) at a median of 20.3 months of TTP. The major adverse events included peripheral sensory neuropathy (14.3%), infection (10.2%), and thromboembolic complications (5.9%). Thirty-two patients who achieved more than a PR proceeded to peripheral blood stem cell collection with a median number of 5.0 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg collected.Conclusion:CTD resulted in a favorable response with tolerable toxicity in patients with MM and did not affect the yield of the stem cell collection.     

Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis

Light chain amyloidosis (AL) is a plasma cell dyscrasia characterized by organ dysfunction, morbidity, and early mortality. Daratumumab in combination with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is now standard frontline AL therapy; however, not all patients are candidates for this intensive regimen. Given the potency of Daratumumab, we evaluated an alternative frontline regimen: daratumumab, bortezomib, and limited-duration dexamethasone (Dara-Vd). Over a 3 year period, we treated 21 patients with Dara-Vd. At baseline, all patients had cardiac and/or renal dysfunction, including 30% of patients with Mayo stage IIIB cardiac disease. Nineteen of 21 patients (90%) achieved a hematologic response with 38% achieving a complete response. The median time to response was 11 days. Ten of 15 (67%) evaluable patients achieved a cardiac response and 7 of 9 (78%) achieved a renal response. The 1-year overall survival was 76%. In untreated systemic AL amyloidosis, Dara-Vd produces rapid and deep hematologic and organ responses. Dara-Vd was well-tolerated and efficacious, even among patients with extensive cardiac dysfunction.