Outcome and prognostic factors in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma relapsing after autologous stem-cell transplantation: a retrospective study of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

BackgroundAutologous stem-cell transplantation (autoSCT) is considered a standard treatment of non-frail patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but little is known about outcome of MCL patients relapsing after autoSCT. We therefore sought to analyse the outcome after autoSCT failure and the efficacy of a rescue stem-cell transplantation (SCT) in this setting.Patients and methodsPatients with MCL were eligible if they had relapsed after autoSCT performed between 2000 and 2009. A total of 1054 patients could be identified in the EBMT registry. By contacting the transplant centres, a full dataset could be retrieved for 360 patients.ResultsMedian overall survival (OS) after relapse of the whole study group was 19 months. A long (>12 months) interval between autoSCT and relapse [P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.62], primary refractory disease (P < 0.02, HR 1.92), prior high-dose ARA-C treatment (P = 0.04, HR 1.43), and the year of relapse (P = 0.02, HR 0.92) significantly influenced OS from relapse in multivariate analysis.Eighty patients (22%) received a rescue allogeneic SCT (alloSCT). Relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and OS 2 years after alloSCT was 33% [confidence interval (95% CI 21% to 45%)], 30% (95% CI 19% to 42%), and 46% (95% CI 33% to 59%), respectively. Remission duration after autoSCT was the only variable significantly affecting the outcome of salvage alloSCT. In contrast, rescue autoSCT was not associated with long-term disease control. However, individual patients survived long term even without salvage transplantation.ConclusionsMCL recurrence within 1 year after autoSCT has an extremely dismal outcome, while the prognosis of patients with longer remission durations after autoSCT is significantly better. AlloSCT may offer the possibility of durable survival when performed for patients with a remission duration of more than 12 months after first autoSCT, but the favourable effect of a salvage alloSCT in this setting needs further validation.     

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With FLT3-ITD Mutated AML: Transplantation in CR1 Is the Decisive Factor for Good Outcome

BackgroundPatients with internal tandem duplication in fms-related tyrosine kinase receptor gene 3 (FLT3-ITD)-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a dismal prognosis and the only curative option seems to be allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). However, its timing is still matter of debate.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 73 consecutive AML patients with FLT3-ITD (median age 53, range 20-68 years) allografted with consistent policy to try to refer them all for upfront alloSCT in first complete remission (CR1).ResultsWith a median follow-up of 44 (range, 5-135) months the 5-year overall survival (OS)/disease-free survival (DFS) probabilities were 49%/47%. The cumulative incidence of relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were 37% and 14%, respectively. The estimated 5-year OS for patients who received transplantation in CR1 was 62% versus 0% for patients who received transplantation beyond CR1. Multivariable analysis identified stem cell transplantation beyond CR1 as the key factor for poor OS (hazard ratio [HR], 5.41; P < .0001), DFS (HR, 4.41; P = .0002), and high relapse incidence (HR, 8.08; P < .0001). Acute graft versus host disease Grade ≥3 predicted higher NRM (HR, 3.80; P = .059) as well as inferior OS (HR, 2.04; P = .0079). No association of patient age, nucleophosmin status, donor type, conditioning, and other variables on the survival was detected.ConclusionAlloSCT should be regarded with urgency as soon as CR1 is achieved in this subset of AML patients.     

Outcomes of Intermediate Risk Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Chemotherapy Consolidation: A Retrospective,Propensity-score Adjusted Analysis

Introduction

Optimal post-remission therapy (PRT) for intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia remains an area of ongoing research. We aimed to retrospectively compare outcomes following autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) with allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) and consolidation chemotherapy (CMT) in patients with intermediate-risk karyotype AML in first complete remission.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Identification of Prognostic Factors

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of prognostic factors on the outcome of patients with MM after ASCT.Patients and MethodsWe analyzed results of 170 consecutive patients (121 male and 49 female) of MM who underwent ASCT. Patients' median age was 52 years (range, 26-68 years). High dose melphalan (200 mg/m²) was used for conditioning. One hundred thirty-two patients (77.6%) had evidence of chemosensitive disease before transplant. Response was assessed using European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation criteria.ResultsPost ASCT 44.7% of patients achieved CR, 24.7% had very good partial response (VGPR), and 21.2% had partial response (PR). Presence of pretransplant chemosensitive disease (CR, VGPR, and PR) and transplant within 12 months of diagnosis for years before 2006 were associated with higher response rates on multivariate analysis. At a median follow-up of 84 months, median overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) is 85.5 and 41 months, respectively. Estimated OS and EFS at 60 months is 62 ± 0.04% and 41 ± 0.04%, respectively. Patients who responded to transplant (CR, VGPR, and PR) had a longer OS (P < .001) and EFS (P < .001). Additionally, patients who achieved CR post transplant had a longer OS (P < .001) and EFS (P < .001). Patients who received novel agents for induction pretransplant had a longer OS (P < .001) and EFS (P < .002).ConclusionOutcome after ASCT is better for myeloma patients with pretransplant chemosensitive disease and those who achieve CR after transplant.     

Prognostic Factors in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors in patients with RCC.Materials and MethodsThe expression of several biomarkers were measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC), together with 2 analytic factors (thrombocytosis and neutrophilia), in 135 patients with advanced RCC treated with new targeted drugs (NTDs) (n = 67) and/or cytokines (CKs) (n = 68)—with 23 of the patients who received CKs also receiving NTDs—between July 1996 and February 2010. Relationships with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were searched for.ResultsUnivariate statistical analysis revealed that high expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) correlated with poor prognosis in NTD treatment (PFS, 5.4 vs. 13.5, low expression months; P = .033) and CK treatment (PFS, 3.3 vs. 5.7, low expression; P = .003). Overexpression of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) was associated with better prognosis with NTD treatment (OS, 32.1 vs. 7.8 months; P < .001) and CK treatment (OS, 32.9 vs. 5.9 months; P = .001). Positive PTEN was related to good prognosis with sunitinib (PFS, 15.1 vs. 6.5 months; P = .003) and CKs (OS, 13.7 vs. 7.9 months; P = .039). Increased expression of p21 was related to poor prognosis with NTD treatment (PFS, 5.9 vs. 16.8 months; P = .024) and CK treatment (PFS, 3.9 vs. 7.5 months; P < .001) Thrombocytosis was related to poor prognosis with NTDs (OS, 15.9 vs. 26.7 months; P = .007) and CKs (OS, 5.9 vs. 14.3 months; P = .010). Neutrophilia was related to poor prognosis with NTDs (OS, 17.6 vs. 25.4 months; P = .063) and CKs (OS, 5.9 vs. 12.8 months; P = .035). Multivariate analysis revealed that overexpression of CAIX was a favorable prognostic factor independent of PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.107; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.055; P < .001).ConclusionsHIF-1α, PTEN, p21, thrombocytosis, neutrophilia, and CAIX in particular are useful prognostic factors in patients with advanced RCC.     

Timing of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Current Therapies

BackgroundAutologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) during the initial treatment of multiple myeloma has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS). While awaiting further prospective data, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients at our program.Patients and MethodsWe included consecutive patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who had undergone stem cell harvest (SCH) from 2005 to 2014 and separated them into early (SCT within 12 months of diagnosis) and delayed (all others, including SCT not yet) groups. The outcomes were OS, PFS to first relapse, and PFS to second relapse.ResultsOf the 514 patients who had undergone SCH, 227 were in the early and 287 in the delayed groups. Patients in the delayed group who had undergone SCT had received more therapy before SCT (55% had received ≥ 2 lines vs. 6% in the early group; P < .001), had had more progressive disease at SCT (34% vs. 4%; P < .001), had received melphalan doses < 200 mg/m² (22% vs. 10%; P = .001), and had had lower rates of very good partial response or better after SCT (58% vs. 79%; P = .001). On multivariable analysis, no differences were found in median OS (90 vs. 84 months; P = .093), PFS to first relapse (40 vs. 37 months; P = .552), or PFS to second relapse (54 vs. 52 months; P = .488) between the early and delayed groups.ConclusionDelaying SCT did not affect OS or even PFS to second relapse in our cohort of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who had received current era induction therapy.     

Comparison of Overall Survival Between De Novo and Secondary Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients of Different Ages

PurposeTo compare the overall survival (OS) between de novo and secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients in different age groups after chemotherapy.Patients and MethodsData from 8305 ALL patients undergoing chemotherapy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 1975 to 2015 were included in this study, of which 7454 (80.11%) were in the de novo ALL group, and 851 (19.89%) were in the secondary ALL (sALL) group. Propensity matching was used before comparison of OS between the two groups.ResultsFemale ALL patients had a lower risk of death than male (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.98; P < .01). The mortality of black patients was higher than in white patients (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.18-1.42; P < .001). Patients aged 45-75 years (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.72-1.94; P < .001) and ≥ 75 years (HR, 3.85; 95% CI, 3.52-4.23; P < .001) had a higher risk of death. Separated/divorced (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10-1.34; P < .001) and widowed (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.21-1.51; P < .001) patients had a higher risk of death than single patients. sALL patients had a higher risk of death than de novo ALL patients (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12-1.30; P < .001). The mean age of the de novo ALL group was lower than in the sALL group (51.05 vs. 60.25; P < .001) after the propensity score was matched, and the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year OS of the de novo ALL group were higher than that of the sALL group aged 18-75 years (P < .001).ConclusionThe survival rate of ALL decreased with increased age. Patients with sALL had poorer OS than de novo patients aged 18-75 years.     

Subgroup analysis in RAISE: a randomized,double-blind phase III study of irinotecan,folinic acid,and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) plus ramucirumab or placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma progression

BackgroundThe RAISE phase III clinical trial demonstrated that ramucirumab + FOLFIRI improved overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.844, P = 0.0219] and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.793, P < 0.0005) compared with placebo + FOLFIRI for second-line metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients previously treated with first-line bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine. Since some patient or disease characteristics could be associated with differential efficacy or safety, prespecified subgroup analyses were undertaken. This report focuses on three of the most relevant ones: KRAS status (wild-type versus mutant), age (<65 versus ≥65 years), and time to progression (TTP) on first-line therapy (<6 versus ≥6 months).Patients and methodsOS and PFS were evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier analysis, with HR determined by the Cox proportional hazards model. Treatment-by-subgroup interaction was tested to determine whether treatment effect was consistent between subgroup pairs.ResultsPatients with both wild-type and mutant KRAS benefited from ramucirumab + FOLFIRI treatment over placebo + FOLFIRI (interaction P = 0.526); although numerically, wild-type KRAS patients benefited more (wild-type KRAS: median OS = 14.4 versus 11.9 months, HR = 0.82, P = 0.049; mutant KRAS: median OS = 12.7 versus 11.3 months, HR = 0.89, P = 0.263). Patients with both longer and shorter first-line TTP benefited from ramucirumab (interaction P = 0.9434), although TTP <6 months was associated with poorer OS (TTP ≥6 months: median OS = 14.3 versus 12.5 months, HR = 0.86, P = 0.061; TTP <6 months: median OS = 10.4 versus 8.0 months, HR = 0.86, P = 0.276). The subgroups of patients ≥65 versus <65 years also derived a similar ramucirumab survival benefit (interaction P = 0.9521) (≥65 years: median OS = 13.8 versus 11.7 months, HR = 0.85, P = 0.156; <65 years: median OS = 13.1 versus 11.9 months, HR = 0.86, P = 0.098). The safety profile of ramucirumab + FOLFIRI was similar across subgroups.ConclusionsThese analyses revealed similar efficacy and safety among patient subgroups with differing KRAS mutation status, longer or shorter first-line TTP, and age. Ramucirumab is a beneficial addition to second-line FOLFIRI treatment for a wide range of patients with mCRC.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01183780     

Outcomes Related to FDG-PET-CT Response in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated With Brentuximab-Vedotin at Relapse or Consolidation

BackgroundBrentuximab-vedotin (BV) monotherapy has shown high efficacy in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after high-dose chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of treatment with BV of HL patients and examined the predictive ability of PET-CT for response in this setting.Patients and methodsRecords of 49 HL patients (median age, 39 years, 55% male) treated with BV for relapse (71.4%) or consolidation (28.6%) post-ASCT were analyzed. Patients who did not reach complete response (CR) on PET/CT after 4 cycles (non-responders) discontinued BV and received the next treatment line. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between responders and non-responders.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 19.1 months, all consolidation patients were alive and none progressed. Median OS in 23 relapsed patients that did not achieve CR after 4 cycles and continued to the next treatment was 55.0 months, while all those in CR (n = 24) were alive (P = .0120). No statistically significant differences in OS were observed between responders and non-responders with relapsed HL (P = .1072). Median PFS evaluated after 4 BV cycles was significantly longer in responders compared to non-responders (47.9 vs. 1.5 months, P < .0001). Neuropathy and neutropenia were the main toxicities observed.ConclusionsHL patients treated with BV for relapse or consolidation who achieved CR by PET-CT after 4 cycles showed improved PFS and OS compared to non-responders. Non-responders treated for relapsed HL who proceeded to the next treatment line demonstrated comparable OS to responders.     

KD-PACE Salvage Therapy for Aggressive Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma,Plasma Cell Leukemia and Extramedullary Myeloma

BackgroundPatients with advanced/aggressive multiple myeloma have limited treatment options to achieve rapid disease control. In eligible patients, bortezomib, dexamethasone, thalidomide, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide is often used. However, many patients are refractory to or have toxicities from bortezomib and there is a need for bridging therapy. We have used a modified regimen incorporating the second-generation proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib (carfilzomib, dexamethasone, thalidomide, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide [KD-PACE]) instead of bortezomib for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.Patients and MethodsThis 2-center retrospective study included consecutive patients receiving KD-PACE for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, plasma cell leukemia, or extramedullary myeloma. The primary outcome was the feasibility of KD-PACE as a bridging therapy to a more definitive treatment option.ResultsFifty-two patients were included. The median age was 57 years, and 67% were male. Thirty-one patients were bridged with KD-PACE to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (29%), allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (27%), or a clinical trial (12%). Patients bridged to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, or a clinical trial had a superior progression-free survival (8.3 months vs 2.3 months in the nonbridged group; P < .001) and overall survival (median, 16.7 months vs 4.3 months in the nonbridged group; P < .001). No unexpected toxicities occurred from the treatment regimen.ConclusionKD-PACE is a promising treatment option for select patients with advanced/aggressive forms of myeloma requiring rapid disease control before a more definitive salvage therapy such as auto/allotransplantation or a clinical trial.     

High Red Cell Distribution Width is an Adverse Predictive and Prognostic Factor in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With Chemoimmunotherapy

IntroductionThe red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is an easy-to-obtain laboratory value that has emerged as a potential prognostic factor in solid and hematologic malignancies.Patients and MethodsWe evaluated 121 patients with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy at our institution between 2010 and 2012. We categorized patients with high RDW (> 14.6%) and normal RDW (11.6%-14.6%). We fitted multivariate regression models for complete response (CR) and overall survival (OS).ResultsPatients with high RDW were less likely to achieve CR to chemoimmunotherapy than patients with normal RDW (48% vs. 83%; P < .001). The 5-year OS rate for patients with high RDW was lower than in patients with normal RDW (51% vs. 79%; P = .001). In multivariate regression models, high RDW was independently associated with lower odds of achieving CR (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.83; P = .02) and with higher risk of death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04; 95% CI, 1.03-4.02; P = .04) than normal RDW in patients with DLBCL treated with chemoimmunotherapy. High RDW remained an independent adverse factor for OS after adjustment for the International Prognostic Index and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index scores with HR 2.20 (95% CI, 1.12-4.31; P = .02) and HR 2.67 (95% CI 1.28-5.59; P = .009), respectively.ConclusionHigh RDW appears to be an adverse predictive and prognostic factor in patients with de novo DLBCL treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone).     

Long-Term Results in Multiple Myeloma After High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Transplantation According to Response Categories in the Era of Old Drugs

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the long-term prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) and the quality of response to therapy in a cohort of 173 patients treated with high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous transplantation in the era of old drugs.Patients and MethodsA total of 173 patients with de novo MM who received a transplant between 1994 and 2010 were analyzed. VAD (vincristine, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], dexamethasone) was used as front-line regimen before auto-HPCT. The conditioning was HDM 200 mg/m². Patients were evaluated for clinical response using the criteria from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, modified to include near complete remission (nCR) and very good partial remission (VGPR).ResultsThe response distribution after transplantation in our series was complete remission (CR) in 33 cases (19%), nearly complete remission (nCR) in 38 cases (22%), VGPR in 30 cases (17%), partial remission (PR) in 65 cases (38%), and stable disease (SD) in 7 cases (4%). Patients were followed for 48 ± 36 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for the CR group. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 122 months for CR, 55 months for nCR, 56 months for VGPR, 32 months for PR, and 22 months for SD. Significant differences in PFS and OS were found between the CR and nCR groups (P = .003 and P = .001, respectively), between the CR and VGPR groups (P = .002 and P = .001, respectively), and between the CR and PR groups (P = .000 and P = .001, respectively). Responses were clustered in 3 main categories, ie, CR, nCR + VGPR + PR, and SD. The respective 10-year PFS and OS values were 58% and 70% for CR, 15% and 18% for nCR + VGPR + PR, and 0% and 0% for SD.ConclusionThe achievement of depth and prolonged response represents the most important prognostic factor. The relapse rate is low for patients in CR after 10 years of follow-up, possibly signifying a cure.     

Combination of Frailty Status and Comorbidity Score Improves the Stratification of Survival in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Owing to Good Predictive Capability for Infection-related Mortality

BackgroundWe investigated the prognostic effects of frailty and its association with comorbidity in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).Patients and MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 118 consecutive patients diagnosed with MDS. Frailty was evaluated using the clinical frailty scale (CFS). Comorbidity was classified using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and MDS comorbidity index (MDS-CI).ResultsOn multivariate analysis, CFS (≥ 5 vs. < 5; hazard ratio [HR], 3.37; P = .002), CCI (≥ 2 vs. < 2; HR, 2.59; P = .002), and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) category (HR, 2.1; P = .009) were independently predictive of overall survival (OS). One-year OS of patients with CFS ≥ 5 or CCI ≥ 2 were significantly worse compared with those with CFS < 5 or CCI < 2 (55% vs. 91%; P < .001; 46% vs. 91%; P < .001, respectively). OS was clearly stratified into 3 groups according to CFS (≥ 5 vs. < 5) and CCI (≥ 2 vs. < 2; P < .001). When comparing these 3 groups, the incidence of infection-related mortality progressively increased with CFS ≥ 5 and/or CCI ≥ 2 (P < .001). This effect was more obvious in patients with lower IPSS-R.ConclusionThe present study suggests frailty and comorbidity may be patient-related, independent predictive factors of poor prognosis. This could probably be attributed to increasing infection-related mortality with frailty and comorbidity. Combining the evaluation of frailty and comorbidity with IPSS-R might aid in more precise prediction of OS, especially in patients with low risk of MDS.     

Preoperative Elevation of C-Reactive Protein Is a Predictor for Adverse Oncologic Survival Outcomes for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis from the International Marker Consortium Renal Cancer (INMARC)

BackgroundWe sought to analyze the usefulness of pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) as a predictor of survival and oncological outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).MethodsRetrospective international analysis of patients with RCC with pretreatment CRP values from 2006 to 2017. A CRP of more than >5 mg/L was deemed elevated. The cohort was subdivided into 2 groups for analysis (normal CRP ≤5 mg/L; elevated CRP >5). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan–Meier analyses (KMA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were used to delineate survival outcomes and their predictors.ResultsWe analyzed 2445 patients (1641 male/804 female; normal CRP 1056/elevated CRP 1389; mean follow-up 36 months). Patients with elevated CRP had a higher incidence of hypertension (P = .001), higher body mass index (P < .001), and larger tumor size (6.0 cm vs 3.9 cm; P < .001). MVA for RFS demonstrated elevated CRP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; P = .005), tumor size (HR, 1.1; P < .001), and high tumor grade (HR, 3.1; P < .001) to be independent risk factors. For normal vs elevated CRP, KMA for RFS of stages 1–4 RCC revealed a 5-year RFS of 93% vs 88% (P = .001), 95% vs 83% (P = .163), 84% vs 62% (P = .001), and 58% vs 60% (P = .513), respectively. KMA MA KMA for OS of stages 1–4 RCC revealed a 5-year OS of 98% vs 81% (P = .001), 94% vs 80% (P = .103), 94% vs 65% (P = .001), and 99% vs 38% (P < .001), respectively.ConclusionsPretreatment CRP was an independent predictor of RFS and OS in an international multicenter cohort of patients with RCC.     

Primary plasma cell leukemia: a retrospective multicenter study of 73 patients

BackgroundEpidemiological and clinical information on primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) are rarely reported. The aims are to evaluate the clinical features, prognostic factors, and efficacy of treatments in pPCL.Patients and methodsA multicenter retrospective cohort study was carried out from January 2000 to December 2008 in 26 Italian hematology divisions. A total of 128 cases of plasma cell leukemia were collected, and 73 of them (57%) were classified as primary (male/female 43/30).ResultsSixty-four patients had at least 1 sign of end-organ damage and 10 had extramedullary localization. One patient died early; of the remaining patients, 36 (50%) received anthracycline-based regimens as first-line therapy, 17 (24%) single alkylating agents, and 30 (42%) bortezomib or thalidomide as additional (n = 11) or unique treatments (n = 19). Twenty-three patients (31%) underwent autologous and/or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The median overall survival (OS) was 12.6 months; complete or partial response was achieved in 22 (30%) and 18 patients (25%), respectively; the median duration of response (DOR) was 16.4 months. HSCT patients had a longer OS and DOR (median 38.1 and 25.8 months, respectively) compared with nontransplanted patients (9.1 and 7.3 months, respectively, P < 0.001). OS was influenced by nonresponse to treatment, hypoalbuminemia, and HSCT. DOR was favorably influenced only by HSCT.ConclusionspPCL is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis and a low response rate to conventional therapy. HSCT is effective, increasing OS and DOR by 69% and 88%, respectively. The use of bortezomib and thalidomide may improve outcomes.     

Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio at Relapse Predicts Outcome for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era

BackgroundPatients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a poor prognosis, even in the rituximab era. Several studies have reported the clinical importance of the peripheral blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in various malignancies, including lymphoma. However, the prognostic value of the LMR in relapsed/refractory DLBCL has not been well evaluated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the LMR at relapse can predict clinical outcomes for relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients treated with rituximab.Patients and MethodsWe analyzed data on 74 patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, who were initially treated with R-CHOP (rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) or an R–CHOP-like regimen.ResultsThere was a significant association between a low LMR (≤ 2.6) and shorter overall survival (OS; P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS; P < .001) compared with the high LMR group (> 2.6). Multivariate analysis showed that LMR was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P < .001) and PFS (P < .001), as was the international prognostic index (IPI) at relapse for OS. In addition, the LMR had an incremental value for OS and PFS compared with the IPI at relapse.ConclusionThe LMR predicts OS and PFS outcomes in relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients treated with rituximab, and might facilitate better stratification among patients in low- and intermediate-risk IPI groups.     

Second Primary Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Head and Neck Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics and Survival Outcomes in 3597 Patients

IntroductionRetrospective studies have shown an increased risk of second primary lung cancer in patients with a history of head and neck cancer (HNC). No population-based study has examined the overall survival (OS) outcomes of patients with second primary non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after HNC comparison with patients with first primary NSCLC.Patients and MethodsIndividuals with histologically confirmed NSCLC diagnosed after nonmetastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNC-NSCLC; n = 3597) were identified in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registries (1988-2013). OS and baseline characteristics were compared in patients with first primary NSCLC (NSCLC-1; n = 365,551) in the same registries.ResultsSquamous NSCLC was more common in HNC-NSCLC (n = 745 [64.1%] localized, n = 833 [71.9%] regional, and n = 811 [63.5%] distant) than in the NSCLC-1 (n = 30,901 [38.3%] localized, n = 50,557 [48.2%] regional, and n = 53,720 [29.8%] distant; P < .001). The leading cause of death in HNC-NSCLC was NSCLC (n = 2183; 60.6%), and median OS after localized, regional, and distant NSCLC diagnosis was 2.50 years, 1.17 years, and 5 months, respectively. For NSCLC-1, median OS was 4.58 years, 1.58 years, and 6 months, respectively. These differences were significant (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, a history of HNC remained associated with worse OS for localized (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.51; P < .001), regional (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.19-1.35; P < .001) and distant (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18; P < .01) stage NSCLC.ConclusionA history of HNC adversely affects OS in patients who subsequently develop NSCLC. This OS decrement might have implications for NSCLC surveillance and NSCLC therapy selection in this population.     

Impact of Tumor Location on Patient Outcomes in Small Bowel Cancers

BackgroundSmall bowel cancers are rare gastrointestinal malignancies and tumor location impact on outcomes is unclear.Material and MethodsA retrospective review was performed on stage I to IV small bowel cancer cases from 2000 to 2017 in British Columbia, Canada. Baseline patient characteristics, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by tumor location and systemic therapy use patterns were summarized.ResultsOf 340 patients included, primary tumor distribution was: duodenum (51.2%), ileum (19.1%), jejunum (18.5%), and unspecified (11.2%). Median DFS for stage I to III disease was 37.7, 49.1, and 26.7 months for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tumors (P = .018). Median OS was 9.6, 35.2, and 20.1 months for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tumors (P < .0001). Compared to duodenal primaries, both jejunal and ileal tumors were associated with significantly improved OS (HR 0.43, P < .001 for jejunal; HR 0.71, P = .035 for ileal). Adjuvant therapy was given to 21.6% of stage II and 50.6% of stage III cancers. Among patients with metastatic disease, median OS was 4.2, 11.4, and 6.9 months for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tumors (P = .0019). Jejunal tumors had the best prognosis (HR 0.48, P = .001 vs. duodenum).ConclusionSurvival differences exist when small bowel cancers were assessed by tumor location, and jejunal tumors portended better prognosis overall.     

Identifying the target NSCLC patient for maintenance therapy: an analysis from a placebo-controlled,phase III trial of maintenance pemetrexed (H3E-MC-JMEN)

BackgroundThis was a post hoc analysis of patients with non-squamous histology from a phase III maintenance pemetrexed study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methodsThe six symptom items' [average symptom burden index (ASBI)] mean at baseline was calculated using the lung cancer symptom scale (LCSS). Low and high symptom burden (LSB, ASBI < 25; HSB, ASBI ≥ 25) and performance status (PS: 0, 1) subgroups were analyzed for treatment effect on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for demographic/clinical factors.ResultsSignificantly longer PFS and OS for pemetrexed versus placebo occurred in LSB patients [PFS: median 5.1 versus 2.4 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.49, P < 0.0001; OS: median 17.5 versus 11.0 months, HR 0.63, P = 0.0012] and PS 0 patients (PFS: median 5.5 versus 1.7 months, HR 0.36, P < 0.0001; OS: median 17.7 versus 10.3 months, HR 0.54, P = 0.0019). Significantly longer PFS, but not OS, occurred in HSB patients (median 3.7 versus 2.8 months, HR 0.50, P = 0.0033) and PS 1 patients (median 4.4 versus 2.8 months, HR 0.60, P = 0.0002).ConclusionsASBI and PS are associated with survival for non-squamous NSCLC patients, suggesting that maintenance pemetrexed is useful for LSB or PS 0 patients following induction.     

Survival Outcomes With Thoracic Radiotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BackgroundThe prognosis of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung carcinoma (ES-SCLC) is poor. The benefit of consolidative thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) in ES-SCLC has been inconclusive, and its use inconsistent. The objective of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) of ES-SCLC patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) with or without TRT using an administrative database approach.Patients and MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with ES-SCLC diagnosed between 2010 and 2014. Those with brain metastases, those who received radiotherapy before CT, or radiotherapy outside the thorax, were excluded. Propensity score-matching (PSM) was used to compare OS of patients treated with CT and TRT with those who received CT alone. Patients who received >10 radiotherapy fractions were also compared with those who received 10 or fewer.ResultsWe included 14,367 patients in the primary analysis; 12,019 received CT alone, and 2348 received CT with TRT. In multivariate analysis, CT was associated with an increased risk of death relative to CT with TRT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.74 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.64-1.84]; log-rank P < .001), which remained significant with PSM. Median OS was 12.1 versus 8.2 months (CT with TRT vs. CT); 12-month OS was 50.5% versus 28.5%, and 5-year OS 7.6% versus 2.0% (HR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.67-1.95], HR P < .001). Of 3099 patients who received TRT, >10 radiotherapy fractions was associated with superior OS (HR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.49-1.95], log-rank P < .001); this finding remained significant with PSM.ConclusionUse of TRT after CT in ES-SCLC patients was associated with long-term survival; its use should be considered in addition to standard of care CT.