Phase 1 Trial Evaluating Vorinostat Plus Bortezomib,Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

IntroductionBortezomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD) is a standard induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Given preclinical and clinical data suggesting the synergistic activity of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat with both bortezomib and lenalidomide for the treatment of multiple myeloma, we hypothesized that adding vorinostat to VRD (R2V2) would increase the rate and the quality of responses to induction treatment. Here we report the results of a phase 1 trial (NCT01038388) evaluating R2V2 as up-front treatment for NDMM patients.Patients and MethodsR2V2 was tested as induction therapy in a dose-escalation phase 1 study in 30 NDMM patients deemed eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. Treatment consisted of 4 induction cycles with R2V2, followed by either autologous stem-cell transplantation or 4 additional R2V2 cycles and lenalidomide maintenance therapy.ResultsThe maximum tolerated dose of vorinostat was 200 mg daily. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (87%), fatigue and peripheral neuropathy (60%), and thrombocytopenia (33%). R2V2 induced an objective response in 96% of patients, with 48% obtaining at least a complete remission. Median progression-free survival was 52 months, with 77% of patients alive at 5 years.ConclusionR2V2 as induction treatment for NDMM patients resulted in remarkable response rates at the cost of increased toxicity.     

Bortezomib,Vorinostat, and Dexamethasone Combination Therapy in Relapsed Myeloma: Results of the Phase 2 MUK four Trial

IntroductionOutcomes continue to improve in relapsed myeloma as more effective treatment options emerge. We report a multicenter single-arm phase 2 trial evaluating toxicity and efficacy of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor vorinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone.Patients and MethodsSixteen patients who had received a median of 1 prior treatment line received bortezomib subcutaneously 1.3 mg/m² days 1, 4, 8, and 11; dexamethasone 20 mg orally days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, and 11-12; vorinostat 400 mg orally days 1-4, 8-11, and 15-18 of a 21-day cycle. After receipt of a minimum of 3 cycles of therapy, participants received maintenance vorinostat (400 mg days 1-4 and 15-18 of a 28-day cycle).ResultsOverall response was 81.3%: complete response occurred in 4 of 16, very good partial response in 2 of 16, and partial response 7 of 16. Clinical benefit response rate was 100%; median progression-free survival was 11.9 months. A total of 75% patients experienced a dose reduction or stopped treatment as a result of intolerability.ConclusionAlthough toxicity and dose reductions were observed, this study demonstrates that the combination of vorinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is effective in relapsed myeloma with good response rates, suggesting there is an ongoing rationale for further optimization of HDAC inhibitor–based combinations in the treatment of myeloma to improve tolerability and enhance efficacy.     

A Clinical and Correlative Study of Elotuzumab,Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide,and Dexamethasone (Elo-KRd) for Lenalidomide Refractory Multiple Myeloma in First Relapse

IntroductionTreatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in first relapse remains a challenge. This phase II study combined elotuzumab (Elo) with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) for treatment of MM in first relapse with the aim of improving efficacy.MethodsEnrolled patients received Elo-KRd induction for 4 cycles, and Elo-lenalidomide maintenance until progression. The primary endpoint was VGPR or better (≥VGPR) postinduction. Secondary endpoints were MRD by flow cytometry, OS, PFS, and safety. Correlatives included characterization of the impact of Elo-KRd on NK and T cell subsets via flow cytometry. Target accrual of 40 patients was not met due to COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsOf 15 patients enrolled, 10 (67%) had high-risk features (del17p, t[4;14], t[14;16], 1q gain/amplification, plasma cell leukemia, extramedullary MM, or functional high risk), 12 (80%) were lenalidomide-refractory, and 5 (33.3%) bortezomib-refractory. Postinduction ≥VGPR was 7/15 (46.7%) and MRD-negative (10⁻⁵) rate 20%. Overall response during study was 80%, including ≥VGPR as best response of 53.3%. At median follow-up of 28.2 (range, 3.8 to 44.2) months, the median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI 1.9, 18), and median OS not reached (95% CI 10.1, NA). No new safety concerns were reported. Elo-KRd treatment did not augment NK cell distribution or activity in blood or bone marrow. Effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells significantly decreased postinduction, with concomitant acquisition of T central memory phenotype, particularly at a high rate in ≥VGPR group.ConclusionA short course of Elo-KRd induction followed by Elo-lenalidomide maintenance demonstrated activity in predominantly lenalidomide-refractory and / or high-risk MM. The results with this well-tolerated combination are comparable to other contemporary approved triplet combinations.     

A Phase I/II Trial of Panobinostat in Combination With Lenalidomide in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

BackgroundLenalidomide and panobinostat have shown single-agent efficacy of 14% to 50% and 27% to 58%, respectively, in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This phase I/II study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of lenalidomide combined with panobinostat in relapsed/refractory HL.Patients and MethodsIn the phase I trial, previously treated patients with classical or lymphocyte-predominant HL received escalating doses of lenalidomide on days 1 to 21 and panobinostat 3 times a week (TIW) every 28 days. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined during cycle 1. When the MTD was determined, a phase II study was conducted to determine overall response (OR).ResultsTwenty-four patients enrolled; 11 in the phase I and 13 in phase II portions. No DLTs were observed but 2 patients who received 25 mg lenalidomide and 20 mg panobinostat experienced neutropenia and thrombocytopenia > 14 days in cycle 2, leading to selection of 25 mg lenalidomide on days 1 to 21 and 15 mg panobinostat TIW for the phase II dose. In all 24 patients, Grade 3 to 4 toxicities consisted of neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (42%), lymphopenia (25%), and febrile neutropenia (25%). OR was 16.7% (2 complete response [CR] and 2 partial response). One patient with CR had lymphocyte-predominant HL and received 22 cycles. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.8 and 16.4 months, respectively.ConclusionAlthough the combination of panobinostat and lenalidomide appears safe in patients with relapsed/refractory HL, the limited efficacy and significant rates of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia observed do not support further evaluation of this combination in HL.     

Phase I Trial of Vorinostat Combined With Bortezomib for the Treatment of Relapsing and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundDevelopment of targeted therapies for MM has improved response rates and increased patient survival, but ultimately the disease becomes refractory and progresses. Vorinostat combined with bortezomib has demonstrated synergistic antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity in preclinical models of MM. The objectives of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose for vorinostat with bortezomib in patients with advanced MM and to evaluate the clinical benefit of this new drug combination.Patients and MethodsPatients ≥ 18 years old with relapsed and/or refractory MM were enrolled into escalating dose cohorts of vorinostat and bortezomib combination therapy. Thirty-four patients were enrolled and were evaluable for safety and efficacy analyses.ResultsAll patients reported adverse events, 89% of which were mild to moderate in severity. Thirteen patients experienced 29 serious adverse events, 12 (41%) of which were considered drug-related. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Partial responses were observed in 9 (27%) patients. Minimal responses were observed in 2 additional patients (6%), and another 20 patients (59%) experienced disease stabilization.ConclusionVorinostat with bortezomib is generally well-tolerated and has clinical activity in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Response rates were similar in patients previously exposed to bortezomib and patients who were naive to bortezomib therapy.     

A Phase II Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundVenetoclax is a selective BCL-2 inhibitor with clinical activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Combinations of venetoclax with agents that have complementary mechanisms of action may improve venetoclax efficacy in RRMM. This study evaluated venetoclax with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (VenPd) in RRMM.Patients and MethodsThis phase II open label study (NCT03567616) evaluated VenPd in patients with RRMM who had received ≥ 1 prior therapy and were refractory to lenalidomide. Venetoclax was administered orally daily for days 1 to 28, pomalidomide was administered orally daily for days 1 to 21, and dexamethasone was administered weekly for each 28-day cycle. The primary objective was to characterize the safety and tolerability of VenPd. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the efficacy and pharmacokinetics. The study was terminated early due to partial clinical hold and decision to pursue biomarker driven strategy.ResultsEight patients were enrolled. Patients had a median age of 67.5 years. All patients received 400 mg venetoclax; 4 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities and the dose was not escalated. All patients had a grade ≥ 3 adverse event, and the most common was neutropenia (n = 6); cytopenias were the most prevalent adverse events. Five patients (63%) had a confirmed response, and the median duration of response was 12.9 months. The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months.ConclusionsGiven the limited enrollment, no clear safety or efficacy conclusions about VenPd can be drawn. Preliminary safety data, particularly the occurrence of cytopenias, can be used to guide dosing strategies for future combinations of venetoclax with immunomodulatory agents.     

A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide Alone in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Chromosome 5 Abnormalities

BackgroundLenalidomide is effective in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with deletion 5q. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk MDS with any chromosome 5 abnormality.Patients and MethodsEighteen adults with AML and 9 with high-risk MDS were enrolled. Lenalidomide was given orally at doses 5 to 25 mg daily for 21 days of a 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable adverse event.ResultsMedian age for all 27 patients was 64 years (range, 39-88 years) with a median of 2 previous therapies (range, 1-6 lines). Two patients (7%) with AML and 5q deletion and +8 cytogenetic abnormality in 2 separate clones achieved complete remission (CR) or CR without platelet recovery (CRp). Response durations were 4 and 6 months, respectively. No responses were seen in patients with chromosome 5 abnormality in a complex cytogenetic background. Twenty patients (74%) developed neutropenic fever or infection requiring hospitalization.ConclusionsClinical activity of lenalidomide as single agent in AML and high-risk MDS with chromosome 5 abnormalities appears to be limited to patients with noncomplex cytogenetics.     

Cyclocytidine-A Phase I Study

Cyclocytidine (2, 2'-0-cyclocytidine) is a synthetic Ara C analogwhich is not deaminated by cytidinc deaminase. Excellent antitumoreffects of this compound against L1210 and other experimentaltumors have been reported recently. Two-to-six milligrams per kilogram weight of cyclocytidine,was injected into 10 patients mainly with hematological tumors. Acute toxic symptoms by cyclocytidine were remarkably less thanthat by Ara C. Peripheral blood cell counts dropped moderatelyand megaloblastosis was detected in all specimens collectedduring the cyclocytidine treatment. No significant biochemicaland biological changes were found. Good partial remission wasobserved in 2 cases of acute leukemia.     

Lenalidomide Monotherapy in Chemotherapy-Naive,Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients: Final Results of a Phase II Study

BackgroundWe investigated the activity of lenalidomide, which has antiangiogenic, antineoplastic, and immunomodulatory properties, in chemotherapy-naive, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients.PatientsPatients received 25 mg/d lenalidomide for 21 days in 28-day cycles, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity developed. Endpoints included overall response rate and clinical benefit (overall response + stable disease), toxicity, time to radiographic progression, and time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, overall survival, and quality of life.ResultsThirty-two patients were enrolled in the study; of these, 77% (n = 25) had Gleason scores ≥ 7. The median age was 74 years (58-89 y), the median PSA level was 66 ng/mL (2-919 ng/mL), and 5 of 32 patients (17%) had liver or lung involvement. The median number of lenalidomide cycles was 3 (1-16 cycles). Stable disease was seen in 20 patients, for a clinical benefit rate of 63%. The median time to radiographic progression was 4 months (2-16 mo); the median overall survival was 20 months. Of 27 PSA-evaluable patients, 13 (48%) had a decline in PSA level; 3 (11%) had > 50% PSA decrease; the median time to PSA progression was 3 months (2-9 mo). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were the most common adverse events without adverse impact on quality of life. Serious adverse events occurred in 14 patients (44%), including 1 patient (3%) with a rash definitely related to lenalidomide.ConclusionLenalidomide monotherapy demonstrates modest activity in chemotherapy-naive CRPC.