Pharmacological management of neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) has a number of severe and disabling consequences, including chronic pain, and around 40% of patients develop persistent neuropathic pain. Pain following SCI has a detrimental impact on the patient's quality of life and is a major specific healthcare problem in its own right. Thus far, there is no cure for the pain and oral pharmaceutical intervention is often inadequate, commonly resulting in a reduction of only 20-30% in pain intensity. Neuropathic pain sensations are characterized by spontaneous persistent pain and a range of abnormally evoked responses, e.g. allodynia (pain evoked by normally non-noxious stimuli) and hyperalgesia (an increased response to noxious stimuli). Neuropathic pain following SCI may be present at or below the level of injury. Oral pharmacological agents used in the treatment of neuropathic pain act either by depressing neuronal activity, by blocking sodium channels or inhibiting calcium channels, by increasing inhibition via GABA agonists, by serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibition, or by decreasing activation via glutamate receptor inhibition, especially by blocking the NMDA receptor. At present, only ten randomized, double-blind, controlled trials have been performed on oral drug treatment of pain after SCI, the results of most of which were negative. The studies included antidepressants (amitriptyline and trazodone), antiepileptics (gabapentin, pregabalin, lamotrigine and valproate) and mexiletine. Gabapentin, pregabalin and amitriptyline showed a significant reduction in neuropathic pain following SCI. Cannabinoids have been found to relieve other types of central pain, and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors as well as opioids relieve peripheral neuropathic pain and may be used to treat patients with SCI pain.     

Pharmacological treatment of diabetic neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain continues to be a difficult and challenging clinical issue to deal with effectively. Painful diabetic polyneuropathy is a complex pain condition that occurs with reasonable frequency in the population and it may be extremely difficult for clinicians to provide patients with effective analgesia. Chronic neuropathic pain may occur in approximately one of every four diabetic patients. The pain may be described as burning or a deep-seated ache with sporadic paroxysms of lancinating painful exacerbations. The pain is often constant, moderate to severe in intensity, usually primarily involves the feet and generally tends to worsen at night. Treatment may be multimodal but largely involves pharmacological approaches. Pharmacological therapeutic options include antidepressants (tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors), α2δ ligands and topical (5%) lidocaine patch. Other agents may be different antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine, lamotrigine, topiramate), topical capsaicin, tramadol and other opioids. Progress continues with respect to understanding various mechanisms that may contribute to painful diabetic neuropathy. Agents that may hold some promise include neurotrophic factors, growth factors, immunomodulators, gene therapy and poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. It is hoped that in the future clinicians will be able to assess patient pathophysiology, which may help them to match optimal therapeutic agents to target individual patient aberrant mechanisms.     

Pharmacological strategies in relieving neuropathic pain

The pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain relies, to a large extent, on drugs belonging to a small number of defined classes. Opioids, tricyclic antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs and membrane stabilisers form the current basis of treatment. Varying levels of evidence support the use of individual members of these classes and overall show no indication that one class of drug, or individual drug has universal effectiveness. More refined knowledge of the modes of action of these agents used to treat neuropathic pain should lead to a more logical approach to the management of this difficult series of conditions. A number of drugs currently licensed for a different indication have recently had an analgesic effect in neuropathic pain attributed to them. In addition, a number of novel compounds are undergoing investigation and provide hope of dicovering more efficacious treatment options in the future.     

Pharmacological strategies in relieving neuropathic pain

The pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain relies, to a large extent, on drugs belonging to a small number of defined classes. Opioids, tricyclic antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs and membrane stabilisers form the current basis of treatment. Varying levels of evidence support the use of individual members of these classes and overall show no indication that one class of drug, or individual drug has universal effectiveness. More refined knowledge of the modes of action of these agents used to treat neuropathic pain should lead to a more logical approach to the management of this difficult series of conditions. A number of drugs currently licensed for a different indication have recently had an analgesic effect in neuropathic pain attributed to them. In addition, a number of novel compounds are undergoing investigation and provide hope of dicovering more efficacious treatment options in the future.     

Pharmacologic management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain

Introduction: Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is a debilitating and distressing complication that occurs in patients with diabetes mellitus. This article provides an overview of diabetic peripheral neuropathy focusing on DPNP.

Areas covered: This article reviews the diagnosis, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of diabetic neuropathy and neuropathic pain. A comprehensive and systematic Medline search of the published literature for treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was done from 1965 to December 2012. Studies not in English language were excluded.

Expert opinion: Neuropathic pain is difficult to treat, and patients rarely experience complete pain relief. Despite several pharmacological agents being used in the treatment of DPNP, only duloxetine and pregabalin have evidence-based support for controlling DPNP.     

Pharmacological characterization of the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain

The chronic constriction injury model is a rat model of neuropathic pain based on a unilateral loose ligation of the sciatic nerve. The aim of the present study was to test its sensitivity to various clinically validated and experimental drugs. Mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia developed within one week post-surgery and were reliably present for at least 7 weeks. Mechanical allodynia was strongly attenuated by morphine (minimal effective dose in brackets: 8 mg/kg, p.o.) and the cannabinoids Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (3 mg/kg, p.o.) and (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl) cyclohexanol (CP 55,940; 0.05 mg/kg, i.p.), and weakly/moderately attenuated by the anticonvulsants gabapentin (50 mg/kg, i.p.) and carbamazepine (32 mg/kg, i.p.), the muscle relaxant baclofen (3 mg/kg, i.p.), and the adenosine kinase inhibitor 4-amino-5-(3-bromophenyl)-7-(6-morpholino-pyridin-3-yl)pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine (ABT-702; 30 mg/kg, i.p.). Thermal hyperalgesia was strongly attenuated by morphine (16 mg/kg, p.o.), Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (6 mg/kg, p.o.), CP 55,940 (0.025 mg/kg, i.p.), carbamazepine (32 mg/kg, i.p.) and the antidepressant amitriptyline (32 mg/kg, p.o.), and weakly/moderately attenuated by gabapentin (50 mg/kg, i.p.), the anti-inflammatory cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib (30 mg/kg, i.p.) and the adenosine A1 receptor positive allosteric modulator 2-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo(b)thiophen-3-yl 4-chlorophenylmethanone (T62; 30 mg/kg, i.p.). Both symptoms were hardly or not affected by the nonselective N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists ketamine and dizocilpine, and the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor NR2B-selective antagonists ifenprodil and R-(R*,S*)-alpha-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-beta-methyl-4-(phenyl-methyl)-1-piperidine propranol (Ro 25-6981). The finding that mechanical allodynia and/or thermal hyperalgesia are attenuated by various established compounds further supports the validity of the chronic constriction injury model for the study of neuropathic pain and its use for the identification of novel treatments.     

Pharmacological management of cancer pain.

Cancer pain remains a major cause of suffering. Improvements in its management have made unrelieved cancer pain unacceptable. While pharmacotherapy is the mainstay of cancer pain treatment, other options such as radiotherapy, nerve blocks, etc., have to be considered as well. A comprehensive approach must also address psychosocial issues. A successful pharmacotherapy programme for cancer pain requires careful assessment of the origin and cause of the pain. The selection of analgesics has to be rationalised using a sequential approach such as the WHO stepladder. Oral application by the block in an individually titrated dosage is recommended. Although morphine remains the most useful opioid, it should be used in combination with nonopioids. Co-analgesics, which contribute to analgesia without being classical analgesics, should be used to treat pain of specific origin. Here membrane-stabilizers, antidepressants and steroids play an often underestimated role in the treatment of neurogenic pain. Anxiolytics and major tranquillisers should be avoided because they cause sedation without improving quality of analgesia. Calcitonin, diphosphonates and spasmolytics are of minor importance in this regard. Finally, concomitant medication to treat side effects of the therapy may be necessary in formulating a comprehensive treatment plan.     

Pharmacological management of metastatic boney pain

Many malignancies metastasise to the skeleton. This often results in a relatively unique pain process, which dramatically affects a patient's quality of life. With one in three members of the population likely to develop cancer at some stage in their lives, the prevalence of bone metastases is high. Despite the large financial investment on therapies for these patients, treatment is still suboptimal. In this article, the various treatments available are reviewed. Opiates and bisphosphonates, the mainstays in current practise, are covered in detail, and evolving therapies that may shape future management are also discussed.     

Pharmacological management of metastatic boney pain

Many malignancies metastasise to the skeleton. This often results in a relatively unique pain process, which dramatically affects a patient’s quality of life. With one in three members of the population likely to develop cancer at some stage in their lives, the prevalence of bone metastases is high. Despite the large financial investment on therapies for these patients, treatment is still suboptimal [1]. In this article, the various treatments available are reviewed. Opiates and bisphosphonates, the mainstays in current practise, are covered in detail, and evolving therapies that may shape future management are also discussed.     

Pregabalin in the management of central neuropathic pain

Central neuropathic pain is a painful condition, often severe, that occurs in a person who is already affected by an injury or disease of the brain or spinal cord. This dual insult is especially threatening to the quality of life of a person and their ability to perform even the most basic of tasks. Despite this high level of suffering there are relatively few trials investigating the management of central neuropathic pain. However, two randomised placebo-controlled studies have recently emerged demonstrating efficacy of pregabalin in reducing central neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury and central poststroke pain. Pregabalin, an anticonvulsant, has been shown to be efficacious in the management of peripheral neuropathic pain of various causes and now may have a role to play in central neuropathic pain.     

加巴喷丁用于神经病理性疼痛治疗的研究进展

研究表明加巴喷丁(gabapentin)可作用于脊髓背角神经原突触后钙离子通道，从而可能阻断了神经病理性疼痛产生的过程。临床证实加巴喷丁对糖尿病神经病变和带状疱疹后神经痛的治疗效果，是治疗神经病理性疼痛有效的药物。     

Pregabalin in the management of central neuropathic pain

Central neuropathic pain is a painful condition, often severe, that occurs in a person who is already affected by an injury or disease of the brain or spinal cord. This dual insult is especially threatening to the quality of life of a person and their ability to perform even the most basic of tasks. Despite this high level of suffering there are relatively few trials investigating the management of central neuropathic pain. However, two randomised placebo-controlled studies have recently emerged demonstrating efficacy of pregabalin in reducing central neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury and central poststroke pain. Pregabalin, an anticonvulsant, has been shown to be efficacious in the management of peripheral neuropathic pain of various causes and now may have a role to play in central neuropathic pain.     

Role of cannabinoids in the management of neuropathic pain

The treatment of pain, particularly neuropathic pain, is one of the therapeutic applications of cannabis and cannabinoids that is currently under investigation and that stimulates interest among clinicians and basic researchers. Animal pain models, including models of acute, antinociceptive, inflammatory and neuropathic pain, have demonstrated the antinociceptive efficacy of cannabinoids without causing serious alterations in animal behaviour. These data, together with the historic and current empiric use of cannabinoids, support the interest in the analysis of their effectiveness in treating neuropathic pain. The evaluation of controlled trials that focus on the effect of cannabinoids on neuropathic pain reveals that this class of drugs is able to significantly reduce pain perception. Nevertheless, this effect is generally weak and clinical relevance remains under evaluation. Moreover, there is a lack of controlled trials and, in particular, comparisons with other drugs generally used in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Despite the fact that further research is required to achieve a definitive assessment, current data obtained from basic research and from analysis of the available controlled trials indicate that cannabinoids can be accepted as a useful option in the treatment of neuropathic pain.     

Pharmacological management of cancer pain in the elderly

Existing studies indicate a high prevalence rate and poor management of cancer pain in the elderly. Pain is often considered an expected concomitant of aging, and older patients are considered more sensitive to opioids. Despite the well known pharmacokinetic changes in the elderly, the complex network of factors involved in the opioid response make the evaluation of a single element, such as age, more difficult.Notwithstanding such difficulties, appropriate analgesic treatment is able to control cancer pain in the elderly in most cases. Skills necessary to optimise pain control in older cancer patients include the ability to objectively assess functional age (not necessarily related to chronological age since the rate of decline is variable), understand the impact of coexisting conditions, carefully manage the numbers and types of drugs taken at the same time and adequately communicate with patients and relatives.The most common treatment of cancer pain consists of the use of regularly given oral analgesics. The elderly are at increased risk of developing toxicity from NSAIDs, and the overall safety of these drugs in frail elderly patients should be considered. When older patients have clear contraindications to NSAIDs, manifest signs of toxicity from these agents, or find that pain is no longer controlled with this class of drugs, opioids should be started. A variety of opioids are available, and they differ widely with respect to analgesic potency and adverse effects among the elderly.Although the aged population requires lower doses of opioids, only careful titration based on individual response can ensure the appropriate response to clinical demand. Elderly patients are potentially more likely to be affected by opioid toxicity because of the physiological changes associated with aging. Nevertheless, appropriate dosage and administration may limit these risks. Cancer patients with pain who do not respond to increasing doses of opioids because they develop adverse effects before achieving acceptable analgesia may be switched to alternative opioids. Despite the favourable effects reported with opioid switching, monitoring is crucial, particularly in the elderly or patients who are switched from high doses of opioids. Adjuvant analgesics, including antidepressants, antiepileptics, corticosteroids and bisphosphonates may help in the treatment of certain types of chronic pain.With an appropriate and careful approach, it should be possible to reduce or eliminate unrelieved cancer pain in most elderly patients and, consequently, to enhance their quality of life. Older patients with cancer should be continuously assessed for cancer pain, both before and after analgesic treatment.     

HIV-associated neuropathic pain: epidemiology, pathophysiology and management

Peripheral neuropathy is associated with numerous systemic illnesses including HIV infection. Neuropathic pain constitutes approximately 25-50% of all pain clinic visits. Distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common form of peripheral neuropathy in individuals with HIV infection. DSP is distinguished from other forms of neuropathy on the basis of history and neurological examination. The pain associated with DSP can be debilitating. Therefore, it is important to diagnose HIV-associated DSP properly and treat the neuropathic pain in order to improve quality of life. We review the clinical manifestations, epidemiology, pathophysiology and management strategies for HIV-associated DSP.     

Pharmaceutical perspective of neuropathic pain management for primary care providers

Inflammopharmacology - Neuropathic pain (NP) is a chronic condition that affects?~?1% of the general population globally. Several conditions such as chronic diabetes, herpes zoster...     

Pharmacological sensitivity and gene expression analysis of the tibial nerve injury model of neuropathic pain

The tibial nerve injury model is a novel, surgically uncomplicated, rat model of neuropathic pain based on a unilateral transection (neurotomy) of the tibial branch of the sciatic nerve. The aim of the present study was to describe some behavioral and molecular features of the model, and to test its sensitivity to a number of drugs which are currently used for the treatment of neuropathic pain. The model was characterized by a pronounced mechanical allodynia which was present in all subjects and a less robust thermal hyperalgesia. Mechanical allodynia developed within 2 weeks post-surgery and was reliably present for at least 9 weeks. Neurotomized rats showed no autotomy and their body weight developed normally. Gene expression in ipsilateral L5 dorsal root ganglia, analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), showed a pronounced up-regulation of galanin and vasointestinal peptide (VIP). This up-regulation developed rapidly (within 1 to 2 days following neurotomy) and remained present for at least 12 days. On the other hand, expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P mRNA was down-regulated 12 days following neurotomy. Mechanical allodynia was completely reversed by morphine [minimal effective dose (MED): 8 mg/kg, i.p.] and partially reversed by carbamazepine (MED: 64 mg/kg, i.p.), baclofen (MED: 3 mg/kg, i.p.) and amitriptyline (trend for efficacy at 32 mg/kg, i.p.), but not by gabapentin (50-100 mg/kg, i.p.). The finding that the tibial nerve injury model shows a robust and persistent mechanical allodynia which is sensitive to a number of established analgesics, as well as a gene expression profile which is compatible with that obtained in other models of neuropathic pain, further supports its validity as a reliable and surgically uncomplicated model for the study of neuropathic pain.     

Mechanisms of neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain is a disease of global burden. Its symptoms include spontaneous and stimulus-evoked painful sensations. Several maladaptive mechanisms underlying these symptoms have been elucidated in recent years: peripheral sensitization of nociception, abnormal excitability of afferent neurons, central sensitization comprising pronociceptive facilitation, disinhibition of nociception and central reorganization processes, and sympathetically maintained pain. This review aims to illustrate these pathophysiological principles, focussing on molecular and neurophysiological findings. Finally therapeutic options based on these findings are discussed.     

Pharmacological profiles of the novel analgesic M58996 in rat models of persistent and neuropathic pain

We investigated the effects of 4-(N-{1-[2-(4-cyanophenyl)ethyl]-4-hydroxypiperidin-4-ylmethyl}-N-methylamino)benzoic acid monohydrochloride (M58996), a novel analgesic, on persistent and neuropathic pain in rats. In the formalin test, oral M58996 (0.3 - 10 mg/kg) reduced nociceptive behaviors only in the late phase. In the neuropathic pain model, oral M58996 (1 - 10 mg/kg) attenuated mechanical allodynia and heat hyperalgesia in the nerve-injured paw without affecting normal responses of the uninjured paw. High doses (10 - 100 mg/kg) of oral M58996 did not influence normal motor function. Thus, M58996 had a wide dose range showing antinociceptive, antiallodynic, and antihyperalgesic effects without motor dysfunction. In addition, we studied the possible mechanisms involved in the M58996-induced antinociception. The antinociceptive effect of M58996 was reversed by intrathecal pertussis toxin, an inhibitor of the inhibitory- and other-GTP-binding protein (G(i/o) protein), but not by subcutaneous naloxone, an opioid-receptor antagonist. This effect was also reversed by intracerebroventricular or intrathecal tropisetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine(3) (5-HT(3))-receptor antagonist, and intraperitoneal bicuculline, a gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A))-receptor antagonist. These results suggest that M58996 produces its antinociceptive effect by a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein mechanism. In addition, the GABA released by the activation of supraspinal and/or spinal 5-HT(3) receptors is likely to contribute to the M58996-induced antinociception.     

Opioids in neuropathic pain

Opiates lack potent analgesic efficacy in neuropathic pain although it is now generally accepted that the poor effect of these drugs reflects a reduction in their potency. Reduction of morphine antinociceptive potency was postulated to be due to the fact that nerve injury altered the activity of opioid systems or opioid specific signaling. Endogenous opioid systems were found to be represented in the regions involved in the nociception and are implicated in chronic pain. Opioid peptides biosynthesis and opioid receptors density in the nociceptive pathways and their functions change under various conditions associated with neuropathic pain following damage to the spinal cord and injury of peripheral nerves. Identification of a role of opioid systems in neuropathic pain and molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying these processes are of importance to understanding of the opioid action in neuropathic pain that will hopefully facilitate development of therapeutic strategies in which effectiveness of opioids in alleviation neuropathic pain is increased.