Influence of coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention on mid‐term outcomes in patients with aortic valve stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BackgroundA high frequency of coronary artery disease (CAD) is reported in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, the optimal management of CAD in these patients remains unknown.HypothesisWe hypothesis that AS patients with TAVI complicated by CAD have poor prognosis. His study evaluates the prognoses of patients with CAD and severe AS after TAVI.MethodsWe divided 186 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI into three groups: those with CAD involving the left main coronary (LM) or proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesion (the CAD[LADp] group), those with CAD not involving the LM or a LAD proximal lesion (the CAD[non‐LADp] group), and those without CAD (Non‐CAD group). Clinical outcomes were compared among the three groups.ResultsThe CAD[LADp] group showed a higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and all‐cause mortality than the other two groups (log‐rank p = .001 and p = .008, respectively). Even after adjustment for STS score and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) before TAVI, CAD[LADp] remained associated with MACCE and all‐cause mortality. However, PCI for an LM or LAD proximal lesion pre‐TAVI did not reduce the risk of these outcomes.ConclusionsCAD with an LM or LAD proximal lesion is a strong independent predictor of mid‐term MACCEs and all‐cause mortality in patients with severe AS treated with TAVI. PCI before TAVI did not influence the outcomes.     

Changes in mitral regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Objectives : To assess the acute and intermediate changes in mitral regurgitation (MR) severity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the CoreValve Revalving SystemTM (CRS). Background : Following surgical aortic valve replacement, improvement in MR is reported in 27–82% of the patients. The changes in MR severity following CRS implantation are unknown. Methods : Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 79 consecutive patients before and after treatment, and at the first outpatient visit. Left ventricular dimensions and ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial (LA) size, and aortic gradient were measured. MR was assessed by color flow mapping and was graded as none, mild, moderate, or severe. It was defined as organic or functional. The depth of CRS implantation was measured by angiography. Results : Post‐treatment, the mean gradient decreased from 48 ± 16 mm Hg to 9 ± 5 mm Hg (P < 0.0001). There was no significant change in the left ventricular dimensions, LA size, and LVEF. MR pretreatment was mild, moderate, or severe in 57%, 18%, and 1% of the patients, respectively. It was defined as organic in 27 patients (36%) and functional in 27 patients (36%). The degree of MR remained unchanged in 61% of the patients, improved in 17%, and worsened in 22%. MR improvement was associated with a lower baseline LVEF (P = 0.02). There was no association between the changes in MR severity and the depth of CRS implantation. Conclusions : Most patients who underwent TAVI had some degree of MR. Overall there was no change in the degree of MR post‐treatment. Patients in whom MR improved had a lower LVEF at baseline. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Severe intraprosthetic regurgitation and valve embolization after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a novel therapeutic approach for high‐risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. The success rate of this new procedure is high; however, procedural complications can occur and may result in devastating outcomes. Here, we report a case of transfemoral catheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve complicated by severe intravalvular leak due to immobile cusp associated with shock. We treated with a second valve that embolized and deployed in the descending aorta. A third valve was then deployed within the first with elimination of aortic regurgitation and immediate hemodynamic improvement. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Concomitant coronary artery disease and its management in patients referred to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the POL‐TAVI Registry

• The femoropopliteal (FP) artery is a common site for endovascular interventions.
• S.M.A.R.T.® stent is effective in treating FP lesions with results comparable to other treatment options.
• Without head‐to‐head randomized controlled trials, the ideal treatment strategy for FP lesions remains unknown.

     

Delayed aortic dissection and valve thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

We report a case of a 78‐year‐old female who presented with type A aortic dissection 22 months following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In addition, preoperative echocardiogram showed high gradients across the aortic prosthesis which was found to be thrombosed. At surgery, the intimal tear appeared to be non‐acute and anatomically related to the rim of the valve cage. The thrombosed valve was not replaced and the patient received anticoagulation therapy following surgery with significant improvement in valve gradients.     

A simple percutaneous technique for hemostasis and closure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Access closure is a key element to successful retrograde percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. It requires large-bore femoral arterial access (18Fr-28Fr) which most operators manage with surgical access and closure under general anesthesia. We report a case example of how, using our center's peripheral interventional experience, we have developed a simple five step technique to achieve hemostasis percutaneously.     

Feasibility of complex coronary intervention in combination with percutaneous aortic valve implantation in patients with aortic stenosis using percutaneous left ventricular assist device (TandemHeart®)

Coronary atherosclerosis is a common finding in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Indeed, aortic stenosis is associated with risk factors similar those of coronary atherosclerosis such as older age, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and smoking. In light of the evolution of percutaneous aortic valve implantation (PAVI) and ongoing improvements in techniques of PCI, a combined approach using PCI and PAVI can be proposed for patients with complex coronary artery and aortic valve disease. This report describes the feasibility of the combination of percutaneous coronary intervention and percutaneous aortic valve implantation with peripheral left ventricular assist device (TandemHeart) support in 3 elderly patients with complex coronary altery disease and aortic stenosis considered too high risk for conventional surgical therapy. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Novel percutaneous intervention technique for obstructed coronary artery after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (valve-in-valve TAVR) increases the risk of coronary obstruction. Although the coronary protection strategy is widely used, the use of the bailout technique after coronary obstruction is limited. Hence, we report a simple bailout technique for coronary obstruction after valve-in-valve TAVR. An 82-year-old woman presented with structural valve deterioration. The left anterior descending coronary artery had 90% stenosis. After TAVR, the prosthetic valve shifted close to the ascending aorta wall, consequently impairing coronary flow. The wire crossed with the Judkins right guiding catheter (JR) reference to the en-face and perpendicular views. Using the guide-extension catheter, the JR contacted the contralateral ascending aorta as a backup catheter. After a balloon was dilated between the prosthetic valve and aorta, JR engaged into the coronary artery with excellent backup. This novel “Whisker pole guiding technique” is useful, even after valve-in-valve TAVR.