The chimney graft technique for preserving renal arteries in stent-graft sealing zones

Patients with juxtarenal aneurysms require complex surgical open repair, which is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. An alternative procedure that can be used is the "chimney graft" technique. Three cases of abdominal aortic aneurysms were successfully treated in our department with this technique. One type-Ia endoleak occurred which was successfully treated with coiling and biological glue infusion. All of the chimney grafts have remained patent for the period of observation. The "chimney" technique has good results as a bail out procedure in complex EVAR or in well planned difficult cases. Long-term data is necessary to determine the efficacy of this technique.     

Therapie des abdominalen Aortenaneurysmas

The treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has changed significantly since the introduction of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). In terms of perioperative morbidity and mortality, randomized multicenter trials revealed results in favour of EVAR compared to open reconstruction. However, EVAR is associated with possible late complications caused by endoleaks, stent migration, kinking and/or overstenting of side branches, making life-long follow-up necessary. Since the majority of patients requiring therapy are elderly and exhibit attendant comorbidities, EVAR has become the procedure of choice in those patients with favourable anatomy. Medicamentous and conservative treatment may be relevant in patients with small to medium-sized aneurysms. Since smoking is one of the major risk factors for the development of AAA, all patients should be advised to stop smoking. Studies on long-term statin therapy in patients following surgical AAA repair showed a reduction in both overall and cardiovascular mortality; AAA patients should therefore receive statins for secondary prevention.     

Renal consequences of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is less invasive and has a lower operative mortality than conventional surgery. The relationship between renal function and outcome following open AAA repair has been extensively investigated, but less work has been undertaken with respect to renal function and outcome after EVAR. We reviewed the literature (Medline and PubMed databases) between 1991 and 2007 to investigate the relationship between EVAR and renal dysfunction. Our review found that perioperative renal dysfunction is attenuated by EVAR. However, dialysis rates after EVAR are similar to those after open surgery. EVAR patients develop progressive deterioration in renal function over time. The etiology is unclear and probably multifactorial, involving embolization, contrast media, and graft misplacement. The effect of transrenal endograft fixation on long-term renal function is unknown, but the technique may be associated with a significantly increased risk of renal infarction. The etiology of the renal injury during and after EVAR needs further evaluation, and techniques aimed at renal preservation should be pursued.     

The chimney graft: a technique for preserving or rescuing aortic branch vessels in stent-graft sealing zones

PURPOSE: To report an alternative to the fenestrated stent-graft for preserving blood flow to side branches in the sealing zones of aortic stent-grafts. TECHNIQUE: A covered stent is deployed parallel to the main aortic stent-graft, protruding somewhat proximally, like a chimney, to preserve flow to a vital side branch covered by the aortic stent-graft. Use of a chimney graft makes it possible to use standard off-the-shelf stent-grafts to instantly treat lesions with inadequate fixation zones, providing an alternative to fenestrated stent-grafts in urgent cases, in aneurysms with challenging neck morphology, and for reconstituting an aortic side branch unintentionally compromised during endovascular repair. This technique has been used successfully in 10 patients, combining chimney grafts in the renal, superior mesenteric, left subclavian, left common carotid, and innominate arteries with stent-grafts in the abdominal (n=6) or thoracic (n=4) aorta. There has been no late chimney graft-related endoleak on imaging studies up to 8 months. CONCLUSION: The use of chimney grafts is feasible in the renal and superior mesenteric arteries, as well as in the supra-aortic branches, to facilitate stent-graft repair of thoracic or abdominal aortic lesions with inadequate fixation zones.     

Endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms: State of the art

Opinion statement  Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) continue to be a leading cause of death, with increasing incidence and prevalence. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) now represents the most common method of AAA repair in the United States. Ongoing improvements in endovascular stent-graft technology have occurred since the first published report of EVAR in 1991. These improvements have led to multiple US Food and Drug Administration-approved devices, streamlined operative techniques, and extended applicability of EVAR. Despite these facts, basic anatomic considerations still eliminate many patients from being offered EVAR. Distinct advantages of EVAR over open repair have been demonstrated, including a less invasive operative exposure, decreased transfusion requirements, shortened intensive care unit and hospital stay, and decreased perioperative mortality. It is our opinion that in 2009, anatomically suitable patients should be offered EVAR as first-line therapy, except for the less common scenario of the young and fit patient, for which open repair should be strongly considered. Use of EVAR for ruptured AAAs also has shown promise, yielding survival results commensurate with the best single-center results with open repair for rupture. However, questions remain regarding the long-term efficacy of EVAR in preventing aneurysm-related death for all patients treated with this technique. As device improvements and technical advances continue, it is reasonable to expect that long-term results will improve as well. Furthermore, the advent of fenestrated and multi-branch endograft technology is expanding indications, and will continue to enlarge the percentage of patients who will be considered acceptable candidates for EVAR. Lastly, randomized clinical trials are under way to determine whether the generally accepted threshold of 5.5 cm for elective open AAA repair should be decreased in patients who are candidates for EVAR. Until further data emerge, standard guidelines for elective aneurysm repair should remain the norm.     

“三文治技术”在腹主动脉瘤腔内修复中保留髂内动脉血流的应用

目的探讨“三文治技术”在合并髂总动脉瘤的腹主动脉瘤患者腔内修复中保留髂内动脉血流的可行性及安全性。方法我们对1例合并双侧髂总动脉瘤的肾下性腹主动脉瘤患者行腔内修复术。该患者由于腹主动脉瘤合并双侧髂总动脉严重扩张,覆膜支架覆盖腹主动脉及髂总动脉瘤的时需覆盖双侧髂内动脉开口,可能造成髂内动脉血流受阻而引起盆腔缺血。我们在进行左髂总动脉腔内修复时应用了“三文治技术”,以覆盖病变血管同时保留一侧髂内动脉血供。结果手术成功地对腹主动脉瘤及双侧髂总动脉瘤进行了覆膜支架的腔内修复,同时保留了髂内动脉血供。结论在复杂腹主动脉瘤髂内修复时,使用“三文治技术”可能是一种有效的保留分支血管血供的方法。     

A modified “Preclosure” technique after percutaneous aortic valve replacement

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of suture‐mediated closure devices using a modified “preclosure” technique for access site management after percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR). Background: PAVR using a retrograde transfemoral approach has recently evolved to an endovascular alternative to open surgery in high‐risk patients. However, large‐bore femoral artery access is required, commonly demanding surgical closure and general anesthesia. A truly percutaneous intervention would be desirable to reduce procedural complexity and diminish the need of vascular surgery and general anaesthesia. Methods: After direct puncture of the common femoral artery, three conventional suture‐mediated closure devices (6F Perclose) were deployed. The preloaded sutures were tied at the end of the procedure. If no immediate hemostasis was achieved, an additional device was deployed thereafter. Results: PAVR with percutaneous access site closure was attempted in 15 consecutive patients and could successfully be achieved in all patients allowing conscious sedation in all but three cases. Following complications occurred: one retroperitoneal bleeding caused by removal of the valve delivery sheath requiring surgical repair, as well as two cases of femoral and iliac artery dissection caused by delivery sheath introduction and treated by stenting and vascular surgery, respectively. Vascular surgery became only necessary due to total vessel occlusion after suture closure and remains the only closure‐related complication. However, treatment led to recovery in all patients. Conclusions: The modified “preclosure” technique is a feasible and safe method for hemostasis after PAVR improving procedural management and diminishing the need for general anesthesia. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Endovascular maneuvers for contralateral stent graft limb misplacement in endovascular aortic repair

Cannulation and placement of the contralateral stent graft limb during endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) procedure are crucial steps as mispositioning may lead to conversion to open aortic repair. Endovascular bail-out strategies for stent graft relocation in EVAR are underreported though detailed knowledge may facilitate application and prevent conversion. We present three endovascular bail-out strategies for repositioning of a mispositioned contralateral stent graft limb. (1) Retraction of the mispositioned component with an inflated reliant balloon and placement of an interposition stent graft after successful cannulation; (2) Push-maneuver of the mispositioned stent graft into the infrarenal aortic aneurysm with an inflated reliant balloon supported by a large lumen introducer sheath and (3) Parallel placement of a second contralateral stent graft limb displacing the mispositioned one against the atrial wall in cases with adequate vessel diameter. Prevention of stent graft mispositioning by applying recognized tests to ensure correct placement are essential, following the slogan: check twice, deploy once.     

Combined surgical and catheter‐based treatment of extensive thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic valve stenosis

An extensive thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) is a potentially life‐threatening condition and remains a technical challenge to surgeons. Over the past decade, repair of aortic arch aneurysms has been accomplished using both hybrid (open and endovascular) and totally endovascular techniques. Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) has changed and extended management options in thoracic aorta disease, including in those patients deemed unfit or unsuitable for open surgery. Accordingly, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly used to treat patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) who are considered at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement. In this report, we describe the combined surgical and catheter‐based treatment of an extensive TAA and AS. To our knowledge, this is the first report of hybrid TAA repair combined with TAVR. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Review of interventional repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with high mortality rate. For over 50 years, open surgical repair was the standard approach for large aneurysms. However, over the past decade, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has emerged as a viable alternative. EVAR is associated with lower operative and short-term morbidity and mortality and similar long-term survival (up to 4 years) compared with surgical repair. Endoleak remains a significant limitation associated with aneurysm expansion and reintervention. With newer, more versatile endograft designs, improvements in durability, and better surveillance techniques, the utilization of EVAR is likely to continue to expand.     

Endovascular treatment of paravisceral mycotic aneurysm: Chimmeny endovascular sealing the end of de road

Open surgery is the elective treatment for mycotic aneurysms of the aorta. This surgery consists of resection of the aneurysm, debridement and revascularization with an in situ or extra-anatomic bypass. Even when surgery has been successful, the morbimortality is raised and the endovascular treatment has become an alternative for specific patients. When mycotic aneurysms involved the visceral arteries, more complex techniques are necessary such as fenestrated endovascular aortic repair or chimmeny endovascular aortic repair and the most frequent complications of this are endoleaks and oclussion the visceral arteries. We present a case of a pacient with a paravisceral abdominal mycotic aneurysms that was result with 2 chimney technique(in the right renal and superior mesenteric arteries) and a single Nellix EVAS(Endologix, Irvine, Calif) of 12 cm long without evidence of endoleaks in the follow-up.     

Duplex Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography for the Postoperative Follow-Up of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Where Do We Stand Now?

In the last decade, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has rapidly developed to be the preferred method for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with suitable anatomy. EVAR offers the advantage of lower perioperative mortality and morbidity but carries the cost of device-related complications such as endoleak, graft migration, graft thrombosis, and structural graft failure. These complications mandate a lifelong surveillance of EVAR patients and their endografts. The purpose of this study is to review and evaluate the safety of color-duplex ultrasound (CDU) as compared with computed tomography (CT), based on the current literature, for post-EVAR surveillance. The post-EVAR follow-up modalities, CDU versus CT, are evaluated questioning three parameters: (1) accuracy of aneurysm size, (2) detection and classification of endoleaks, and (3) detection of stent-graft deformation. Studies comparing CDU with CT scan for investigation of post-EVAR complications have produced mixed results. Further and long-term research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of CDU versus CT, before CDU can be recommended as the primary imaging modality for EVAR surveillance, in place of CT for stable aneurysms.     

Endovascular repair of a leaking aortic-arch pseudoaneurysm using graft stent combined with chimney protection to left common carotid artery: Case report and review of literature

Aortic pseudoaneurysm (PsA) is a rare but serious condition that has high mortality and morbidity rates if untreated. We report a rare case of leaking aortic-arch PsA repaired by thoracic endovascular aortic repair using graft stent with the chimney technique to protect the left common carotid artery. Unlike other cases in the literature, our case was unique, having leaking PsA not related to previous cardiac surgery or aortic dissection. The successful management of this patient using thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with the chimney technique suggests that this approach may be an attractive therapeutic alternative to treat aortic-arch PsA.     

What is the best management for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients at high surgical risk? A single-center review.

AIM: To determine the best treatment for high-risk patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: We reviewed a prospective database of all patients who underwent conventional (OPEN) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between January 1998 and December 2002. Patients were preoperatively classified according to the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA). Comorbidities and medical risk factors were categorized according to the Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards. Perioperative mortality and morbidity rates were analyzed according to the type of surgical procedure (OPEN vs EVAR) and ASA class. Patients in ASA classes I and II were excluded. Continuous data were expressed as mean +/- standard deviation. All data were calculated using the cumulated actuarial method of event outcome probability. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed and the log-rank statistic and chi squared test were used for comparative data. P values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: Of the total 375 patients who underwent AAA repair, 168 (45%) belonged in ASA classes III and IV (85 submitted OPEN and 83 EVAR to repair). Among general risk factors only coronary artery disease differed significantly between the 4 groups (P = 0.04). The Bonferroni correction identified a statistically significant difference between ASA classes III and IV for the OPEN technique and for EVAR (P = 0.007 and P = 0.012). Neither 30-day morbidity or mortality differed significantly according to ASA class and surgical technique. The median follow-up was 19 months (range 5-60 months). The overall survival was 78% at 60 months. Survival rates during follow-up differed significantly in the 2 risk classes (ASA III 5/123, 4% vs ASA IV 9/38, 24%), (P = 0.0001). The deaths in the ASA class 4 patients (12/14; 86%) were caused by preexisting medical comorbidities (in 9 patients cardiovascular, in 1 cancer and in 2 cirrhosis). CONCLUSIONS: Except patients with small aneurysms (< 6 cm), in whom the risk of death at 1-year due to comorbidities exceeds the risk of a ruptured aneurysm, all patients at high surgical risk (ASA class IV) benefit from AAA repair. Patients with small aneurysms must undergo strict surveillance to assess growth and aneurysmal wall changes to prevent unexpected rupture.     

Endovascular repair of paraanastomotic aneurysms after aortic reconstruction

We designed this retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous approaches for repair of paraanastomotic aneurysms that develop after surgical aortic reconstruction. The catheterization records of patients who had undergone percutaneous repair of para-anastomotic aneurysms from January 2001 through December 2005 were reviewed, and data regarding preoperative aneurysm size, risk factors, intraoperative techniques, morbidity, and death were recorded. Eight patients had undergone exclusion of a total of 10 paraanastomotic aneurysms. The average age of the prosthetic graft at diagnosis was 11.7 years. Four of the patients were symptomatic; none of these had a ruptured aneurysm. All patients received commercially available devices. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Conscious sedation alone was administered to 7 patients. There were no in-hospital deaths, and morbidity was minimal. We conclude that endovascular exclusion of paraanastomotic aneurysms after aortic reconstruction is a viable alternative to open surgical repair and greatly reduces the risk of morbidity and death.     

Endovascular Treatment versus Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The Influence of Fitness in Decision Making

Two methods of repair are currently available for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), open aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The decision making depends on the balance of risks and benefits. The treating physician must take into account the patient''s life expectancy, the patient''s fitness, the anatomic suitability that makes endovascular repair possible, and finally the patient''s preference. The patient''s fitness is an important variable predicting the outcome of AAA surgical reconstruction. The hypothesis is that the impact of risk factors upon perioperative mortality might differ between patients undergoing open repair and endovascular repair. The purpose of this review article is to investigate whether fitter patients with a large AAA benefit more from having endovascular rather than open repair. According to the available data, there is emerging evidence that patients at high medical risk for open repair may benefit from EVAR while in low risk patients with suitable anatomy for EVAR, both techniques have similar effects. There is rising evidence that a patient with ruptured AAA would benefit more from an endovascular procedure if eligible, and thus fitness in such emergencies is not the first priority but anatomical suitability for EVAR.     

Endografting increases total volume of AAA repairs but not at the expense of open surgery: experience in more than 1000 patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the volume of open graft replacements (OGR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) versus endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVAR) over time and after modifying selection criteria. METHODS: A review was conducted of 1021 consecutive patients who underwent AAA repair from 1989 through 2002: 496 elective OGRs for infrarenal AAAs (STANDARD), 289 elective EVARs for infrarenal AAAs, 59 complex OGRs for suprarenal AAAs, and 177 emergent OGRs for ruptured AAAs. Patients from 1995 to 2002 were divided into 2 groups based on shifting treatment strategies; 454 patients were treated by STANDARD or EVAR at the surgeon's discretion between 1995 and 2000 (post EVAR). The second group comprised 161 patients treated in 2001-2002 after the introduction of "high-risk" screening criteria (age > or = 72 years, diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, impaired pulmonary function, or ASA class IV) that dictated EVAR whenever anatomically feasible. For comparison, 170 STANDARD repairs performed in the 6 years prior to EVAR served as a control. RESULTS: While surgery for ruptured AAAs remained fairly stable over the 14-year period, the number of patients undergoing elective repair increased due to the implementation of EVAR. During the 6 years after its introduction, EVAR averaged 34.3 patients per year; after 2001, the annual frequency of EVAR increased to 41.5 (p > 0.05). In like fashion, the rate of STANDARD repairs increased to 41.3 patients per year versus 28.3 before EVAR (p = 0.032). ASA class IV patients increased by almost 9 fold in the recent period versus pre EVAR (p = 0.006). The overall mortality after elective infrarenal AAA repair decreased between the pre and post EVAR periods (6.5% versus 3.7%, p > 0.05) and fell still further to 1.2% in the most recent period (p = 0.021 versus pre EVAR). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an EVAR program increases the total volume of AAA repairs but does not reduce open surgical procedures. By allocating patients to EVAR or open repair based their risk factors, mortality was markedly reduced.     

Surgical Versus Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Evidence to Guide the Optimal Approach for the Individual Patient

The choice between an open surgical and an endovascular approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair remains an individualized clinical decision. As the technology and applications of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) continue to evolve, so does the literature investigating its outcomes. Multiple high-quality, randomized controlled trials comparing EVAR to open surgical repair (OSR) have now been published with long-term follow-up. Experience with ruptured aneurysms and the use of complex endografts is growing as well. This review is an up-to-date compilation of pertinent clinical trials for practitioners placed in the context of individual patient considerations to guide the choice of an optimal approach to the management of AAAs.     

Endovascular Repair of a Large Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Using Monitored Anesthesia Care and Local Anesthesia

Over the last decade, there has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) from open repair to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Regardless of the method used during emergent rupture, open verses endovascular repair, the overall mortality remains high. Recent studies have compared patient outcomes using different types of anesthesia during elective EVAR procedures. The data show that during an elective EVAR, monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with local anesthesia is not only just as safe as general anesthesia, but it offers other potential benefits as well. There is limited data in regards to patient outcomes using MAC and local anesthesia during cases of large ruptured aneurysms that are treated with EVAR. This case report discusses the treatment of a patient who presented with a large 13 cm ruptured AAA which was successfully repaired using EVAR with MAC and local anesthesia.