Prospective evaluation of carcinoembryonic antigen levels and alternating chemotherapeutic regimens in metastatic breast cancer

Ninety-seven eligible and evaluable women with metastatic breast cancer were placed on a prospective clinical protocol to evaluate the use of continuous cyclic therapy with dibromodulcitol, doxorubicin, vincristine, tamoxifen, and fluoxymesterone (DAVTH) v DAVTH alternating with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and prednisone (CMFP); and the use of pretreatment and serial carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in these patients. Continuous DAVTH and DAVTH/CMFP were equivalent therapies with respect to response rates, time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival. Pretreatment CEA levels were elevated (greater than 5 ng/mL) in 42/97 patients and less than 5 ng/mL in the remaining patients. Patients with elevated pretreatment CEA levels were more likely to be estrogen receptor (ER) positive (P = .006), to have prolonged disease-free intervals (P = .017), to have hepatic (P = .004) and/or osseous (P = .01) metastases, and to have multiple sites of metastatic disease (P = .004). Pretreatment CEA levels did not significantly predict for overall response rates, TTF, or survival; nonetheless, those patients with low pretreatment CEA levels had more complete responses (CRs) (16/55 v 4/42; P = .02). Serial CEA levels during therapy revealed a number of interesting patterns. During the first 4 months of treatment, serial CEA levels in responding patients either (1) progressively declined (15/29 women with elevated pretreatment CEA levels), or (2) initially rose significantly (mean, 243% of pretreatment value) and then declined (14/29 women with elevated pretreatment CEA levels). Peak CEA levels in the latter patients were seen 27 to 135 days following initiation of cytotoxic therapy. In some patients the initial increase in the CEA level was incorrectly interpreted as evidence of impending disease progression. CEA levels frequently increased around the time of clinical disease progression. However, rising CEA levels rarely provided a clinically meaningful lead time before the appearance of other clinical evidence of disease progression. These data suggest that routine pretreatment and monthly serial CEA levels in metastatic breast cancer patients have minimal use in clinical practice. Two further noteworthy findings were observed in this prospective study. First, patients with an unknown ER status had a prolonged median survival when compared with patients with ER positive or negative tumors; this appeared to be related to prolonged disease-free intervals in ER unknown patients. Second, two case of secondary acute leukemia were seen in patients treated with continuous DAVTH therapy.     

A randomized study comparing oral and standard regimens for metastatic breast cancer

We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing oral regimen [doxifluridine, an intermediate metabolite of capecitabine, + medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) + cyclophosphamide (CPA)] (Method A) with a standard regimen (5-fluorouracil + adriamycin + CPA) plus MPA (Method B) as first line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Overall response rate was 55.8% for Method A, 46.3% for Method B. The total ratio of responder and long stable disease was significantly higher with Method A (p=0.006). Median time to progression and survival were not differences between Methods. Incidence of toxicity was 56.3% with Method A and 80.0% with Method B (p=0.014). Oral regimen is more useful than standard therapy.     

A pilot study of cabergoline for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Purpose

The prolactin (PRL) receptor is over-expressed in breast cancer, and pre-clinical data indicate that it contributes to breast oncogenesis. Cabergoline is a potent dopamine receptor agonist of D2 receptors and has a direct inhibitory effect on pituitary PRL secretion.

Methods

A phase II study of cabergoline in patients with metastatic breast cancer was conducted. The primary end point of the study was to determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 2 months. Eligible patients had tumors of any receptor status with no limit of prior lines of therapy. Measurable and unmeasurable diseases were allowed. Cabergoline 1 mg orally, twice weekly (1 cycle = 4 weeks) was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. PRL receptor immunohistochemical staining was performed on available baseline tumor tissue; serial serum PRL levels were assessed.

Results

Twenty women were enrolled; 18 were evaluable for CBR. Tumor receptor status was distributed as follows: HR?any/HER2+ 2(10%), HR+/HER2? 18 (90%). The CBR was 33% (6/18), median progression free survival was 1.8 months, and median overall survival was 10.4 months. Two patients experienced disease control for over 12 months. Most common treatment-related adverse events were nausea (30%), fatigue (25%), and elevation in alkaline phosphatase (15%). Nine patients had baseline tissue for analysis; there was no association between baseline tumor PRL receptor expression and clinical benefit (p = 0.24). Change in serum PRL level and response were not correlated after 2 months of treatment (p = 0.64).

Conclusion

Cabergoline was well tolerated, and while the ORR was low, a small subset of patients experienced extended disease control.

     

A pilot study of trastuzumab and vinorelbine-combined therapy for metastatic breast cancer

We performed combined therapy with trastuzumab-vinorelbine for 6 HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients from which informed consent was obtained. As the initial dosage, we administered 4 mg/kg of trastuzumab, followed by a dosage of 2 mg/kg every week thereafter. At the same time, 25 mg/m2 of vinorelbine was administered for 2 weeks, followed by a week of rest. Total administration frequency of trastuzumab was 13-34 times (median: 27 times) and vinorelbine was 8-22 times (median: 17 times). A partial response was seen in 4 patients and no change in 2, for a response rate of 66%. A fixed period effect was recognized in each case, and the TTP was 112-274 days (median: 205 days). The side effects recognized were leukopenia of grade 3 in 1 patient, but she recovered during a withdrawal period. After that, continuous administration was possible. Trastuzumab-vinorelbine combined therapy expanded treatment alternatives for HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients and might prolong life.     

A systematic review of taxane-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer

We compared the results of randomised trials comparing taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens with regimens not containing a taxane in women with metastatic breast cancer. The specialised register of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched in March 2004. Eligibility was assessed and data extracted from eligible studies by two reviewers. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived for time-to-event outcomes, and a fixed-effect model was used for meta-analysis. Tumour response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables. Of 21 eligible trials, 16 had published some results and 12 data on overall survival. An estimated 2621 deaths among 3643 women suggest a significant difference in overall survival in favour of taxane-containing regimens (HR 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.00, P=0.05). The treatment effect on survival was similar if only trials of first-line chemotherapy were included, although not statistically significant. There appeared to be an advantage for taxanes in time to progression (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99, P=0.02) and overall response (odds ratio (OR) 1.34, 95% CI 1.18-1.52, P<0.001). There was significant heterogeneity across the trials (P<0.001), partly because of the varying efficacy of the comparator regimens. Taxane-containing regimens improved overall survival in women with metastatic breast cancer. Taxane-containing regimens are more effective than some, but not all, nontaxane-containing regimens.     

A randomized phase III study comparing three anthracycline-free taxane-based regimens, as first line chemotherapy, in metastatic breast cancer

Background Effective anthracycline-free combinations need to be evaluated in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), due to the increased number of patients treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and methods Patients with MBC were randomized to paclitaxel and carboplatin (PCb) every 3 weeks or docetaxel and gemcitabine (GDoc) every 3 weeks or weekly paclitaxel (Pw). Trastuzumab was given to patients with HER-2 over-expressing tumors. The primary endpoint of the study was survival. Quality of life (QoL) and cost were assessed. Results Totally, 416 eligible patients entered the study. Median survival times were 29.9 months for PCb, 26.9 for GDoc and 41.0 for Pw (P = 0.037). According to multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy, >1 metastatic sites, lack of maintenance hormonal therapy, and worse performance status (PS) were significant adverse prognostic factors for survival, while Pw when compared to GDoc improved survival (P = 0.03), as well as when compared to PCb in the subgroup of patients with PS = 1 (P = 0.01, treatment by PS interaction P = 0.03). No significant differences in terms of time to progression were found. Severe myelotoxicity and mucositis were more frequent with GDoc, while severe neuropathy with PCb and Pw. QoL changes did not differ significantly between treatment groups, while cost analysis favored Pw. Conclusions Pw appears to be the most preferable choice among the 3 anthracycline-free taxanes-based regimens tested in the present study.     

A randomized phase II study of alternating and sequential regimens of docetaxel and doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of alternating and sequential regimens of docetaxel and doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with MBC requiring first-line chemotherapy for progressive disease (n = 106) were randomized and received 3-weekly monotherapy with docetaxel (T, 100 mg/m2, 1-h i.v. infusion) and doxorubicin (A, 75 mg/m2, 20-30-min i.v. infusion) either on a cycle-by-cycle alternating basis (ATATATAT, n = 51) or sequentially each for four cycles (TTTTAAAA, n = 55). RESULTS: For both regimens, the median number of cycles administered was the maximum of eight. The alternating and sequential groups achieved similar objective tumor response rates (60% and 67%, respectively) and similar median duration of response (47 and 44 weeks, respectively). With a median follow-up of 31 months, median survival times were estimated at 20 and 26 months in the alternating and sequential groups, respectively. No unexpected toxicities were reported. Compared with alternating therapy, patients receiving sequential therapy were more likely to complete the planned eight chemotherapy cycles (69% versus 63%), and had a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia (2% versus 14%). CONCLUSIONS: Alternating and sequential docetaxel-doxorubicin regimens are viable alternatives to simultaneous combination therapy in MBC, with sequential therapy achieving slightly higher response rates and improved tolerability compared with alternating therapy.     

Two regimens of docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer

Conclusions All cancer therapy seeks to balance maximum anticancer efficacy with minimal toxicity. This study suggests, but because of the small sample size does not prove, that weekly administration of docetaxel is better tolerated without loss of efficacy.     

3-year results of docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel has proven efficacy in metastatic breast cancer. In this pilot study, we explored the efficacy/feasibility of docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens as adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1996 till March 1998, four consecutive groups of patients with stages II and III breast cancer, aged < or = 70 years, received one of the following regimens: a) sequential Doxorubicin (A) --> Docetaxel (T) --> CMF (Cyclophosphamide+Methotrexate+5-Fluorouracil): A 75 mg/m q 3 wks x 3, followed by T100 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 3, followed by i.v. CMF Days 1+8 q 4 wks x 3; b) sequential accelerated A --> T --> CMF: A and T administered at the same doses q 2 wks with Lenograstin support; c) combination therapy: A 50 mg/m2 + T 75 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4, followed by CMF x 4; d) sequential T --> A --> CMF: T and A, administered as in group a), with the reverse sequence. When indicated, radiotherapy was administered during or after CMF, and Tamoxifen after CMF. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were treated. The median age was 48 years (29-66) and the median number of positive axillary nodes was 6 (1-25). Tumors were operable in 94% and locally advanced in 6% of cases. Pathological tumor size was >2 cm in 72% of cases. There were 21 relapses, (18 systemic, 3 locoregional) and 11 patients (12%) have died from disease progression. At median follow-up of 39 months (6-57), overall survival (OS) was 87% (95% CI, 79-94%) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 76% (95% CI, 67%-85%). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of these docetaxel-based regimens, in terms of OS and DFS, appears to be at least as good as standard anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), in similar high-risk patient populations.     

A feasibility study evaluating docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer

Background and purpose:Docetaxel is an active agent in thetreatment of metastatic breast cancer. We evaluated the feasibility ofdocetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens as adjuvant therapies forpatients with node-positive breast cancer. Patients and methods:Three consecutive groups of patients withnode-positive breast cancer or locally-advanced disease, aged 70 years,received one of the following regimens: a) sequential A T CMF:doxorubicin 75 mg/m² q 3 weeks × 3, followed by docetaxel 100mg/m² q 3 weeks × 3, followed by i.v. CMF days 1 + 8 q 4weeks × 3; b) sequential accelerated A T CMF: A and T wereadministered at the same doses q 2 weeks; c) combination therapy: doxorubicin50 mg/m² + docetaxel 75 mg/m² q 3 weeks × 4,followed by CMF × 4. When indicated, radiotherapy was administeredduring or after CMF, and tamoxifen started after the end of CMF. Results:Seventy-nine patients have been treated. Median age was48 years. A 30% rate of early treatment discontinuation was observedin patients receiving the sequential accelerated therapy (23% duringA T), due principally to severe skin toxicity. Median relativedose-intensity was 100% in the three treatment arms. The incidence ofG3–G4 major toxicities by treated patients, was as follows: skintoxicity a: 5%; b: 27%; c: 0%; stomatitis a: 20%;b: 20%; c: 3%. The incidence of neutropenic fever was a:30%; b: 13%; c: 48%. After a median follow-up of 18months, no late toxicity has been reported. Conclusions:The accelerated sequential A T CMFtreatment is not feasible due to an excess of skin toxicity. The sequentialnon accelerated and the combination regimens are feasible and under evaluationin a phase III trial of adjuvant therapy.     

5-Fluorouracil and dipyridamole in metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study

In an attempt to increase the clinical activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by blocking the thymidine salvage pathway, 15 patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were treated with oral dipyridamole (D): 75 mg p.o. q.i.d. and 5-FU: 400 mg/m2 i.v. by bolus for 5 consecutive days, every 28 days. All the patients were pretreated with 5-FU and an anthracycline-based regimen. Toxicity was minimal, with 8 patients experiencing a D-related moderate headache. Although no objective responses were seen, two patients with 5-FU refractory disease showed tumor shrinkage. A different D schedule and the addition of folinic acid (FA) to 5-FU might provide better results and deserves further evaluation.     

Trastuzumab regimens for HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer

Combination treatment with chemotherapy and trastuzumab is now standard therapy for the first-line treatment of women with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Combination therapy with trastuzumab has been shown to increase response rates, time to progression, quality of life, and overall survival for such patients. Several combination regimens have been developed, and newer combination regimens have recently been reported and are being studied in ongoing clinical trials. Newer trastuzumab-based regimens include triplet combinations with taxanes and platinum salts and regimens combining other innovative therapies. Among the increasing array of available combinations, several have proven appropriate for first-line therapy. To date, the optimal combination region has not been defined. Moreover, several questions remain regarding best scheduling, treatment duration, and use of trastuzumab at disease progression. This review briefly outlines the evolving role of trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer.     

非小细胞肺癌三种化疗新方案的药物经济学评价

目的 从药物经济学角度出发，对中晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）三种化疗新方案进行分析评价，为临床合理用药提供参考。方法 采用药物经济学费用－效果分析法101例中晚期NSCLC的三种化疗方案，泰素＋顺铂（paclitaxel DDP,PC)，泰索帝＋顺铂（docetaxel DDP,TC)，以及诺维本＋顺铂（vinorelbine DDP,VC)，进行临床病例的回顾性分析比较。结果 PC、TC和VC组的有效率分别为46．9％、48．6％和47．1％；中位生存期分别为7．8、7．5和7．6月；1年生存率分别为37．5％、37．1％和38．2％；PC组的有效率、中位生存期与TC组比较有显著性差异（P＜0．05），但与VC组比较则无显著性差异（P＞0．05）；三组间1年生存率无显著性差异（P＞0．05）。三方案的1个化疗周期人均总费用分别为人民币15840．5、15831．1和9401．8元；有效率每增加1个百分点所需费用分别为337．75、325．74和199．61元；中位生存期每延长1个月的成本为2030．83、2110．97和1237．08元；1年生存率每提高1个百分点需支出的人民币分别为422．41、426．71和246．12元。结论 在中晚期NSCLC的3种化疗新方案中，VC的费用明显低于PC和TC方案，获得的单位效果的成本也最低。     

Short-term chemotherapy of poor-prognosis metastatic breast cancer with three non-cross resistant chemotherapy regimens. A Southwest Oncology Group Study

A Southwest Oncology Group pilot study was designed to evaluate a brief, 4.5-month induction course of chemotherapy with three presumably non-cross resistant regimens in poor-prognosis metastatic breast cancer. Sixty-three patients were treated with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, plus vincristine on day 1, methotrexate followed 30 minutes later by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on day 22, and mitomycin C plus 3 days of vinblastine on day 43. All three sequential regimens were repeated once and therapy was then discontinued in responding patients. The same chemotherapy was reinstituted at the time of relapse. The overall response rate to the induction chemotherapy was 35% and included only one complete response (2%). Median response duration was 9 months. Respondents were off all therapy for a median of 5 months (range, 1-12+ months) and were followed without evidence of progressive disease. Response to retreatment was 30% with no complete responses seen. Overall median survival from the data of diagnosis of metastatic disease was 24 months, with a median survival of 14 months from the date of initiation of therapy. Toxicity for this induction regimen was moderate with two treatment-related deaths secondary to myelosuppression. While the results of this pilot study fail to support the use of non-cross resistant regimens in breast cancer, short-term therapy appears to have no adverse effect on survival and resulted in significant periods during which no therapy was given, resulting in a reduction in overall toxicity.     

A randomized phase II study of combination, alternating and sequential regimens of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of doxorubicin and docetaxel (DOC) administered either as a combination, an alternating or a sequential regimen in women with metastatic breast cancer. Secondary objectives included overall response, time to progression, survival and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with breast cancer (n=123) were randomized to receive doxorubicin and DOC either in combination (60 mg/m2 of each drug), or by alternated or sequential schedule (100 mg/m2 DOC and 75 mg/m2 doxorubicin) every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles as first chemotherapy for stage IV disease. A second randomization allocated patients from each arm to receive prophylactic oral ciprofloxacin or no therapy to prevent febrile neutropenia. RESULTS: Patients received a median of eight cycles. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response was 63%, 52% and 61% in the combination, alternating and sequential schedules, respectively. Corresponding rates of complete response were 15%, 14% and 11%. Grade 4 neutropenia was common in all arms (81%) and, together with febrile neutropenia, was significantly more frequent with the combination. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin did not reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia or infection. Other frequent non-hematological adverse events included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis and asthenia. Congestive heart failure only occurred in the combination arm (10%). CONCLUSION: All three schedules are feasible and endowed of good therapeutic activity. In view of the more pronounced toxicity and the risk of cardiac events because of the higher exposure to doxorubicin, the combination should be least favored when treating women with metastatic breast cancer. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin was ineffective and is not recommended.     

Intravenous administration of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in metastatic breast cancer. A pilot study

Sixty-two women with advanced breast cancer were admitted to a pilot study in which a modified CMF regimen was administered. Cyclophosphamide was administered i.v. at a dosage of 600 mg/m2 on the same day as fluorouracil (600 mg/m2/i.v.) and methotrexate (40 mg/m2/i.v.). The therapy was recycled on the 21st day and in the presence of myelosuppression, the administration of the drugs was delayed for 1-2 weeks recovery of the hematologic values. CR + PR were obtained in 42% of patients and no change in 32% (U.I.C.C. criteria). Metastases to soft tissues showed CR + PR in 55% of the cases, bone in 33% and viscera in 35%. The menopausal status, the disease-free interval and the number of involved sites did not influence statistically the percentage of responses; however, the response rate was influenced statistically by previous treatment. The median duration of response was 7.5 months; the median overall survival of the 60 evaluable patients was 18 months. Due to myelosuppression, CMF i.v. administration was delayed 90/620 times (14%). Toxicity was acceptable and had a lower incidence than that reported in the literature in different series of CMF administered p.o. Nausea and vomiting, in particular, were limited to 24-48 h after administration of the drugs, and alopecia was seldom observed.     

Evaluation of therapeutic regimens for taxane-resistant recurrent/metastatic breast cancer

Taxanes (TX) were administered to 246 of 292 patients with recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who were treated in Hiei Hospital between January 2001 and May 2006. Recently, TX has been increasingly prescribed for preoperative treatment and postoperative adjuvant therapy. To improve the prognosis of MBC, regimens effective for TX-resistant cancer patients should be developed. In this study, with respect to hormone receptor (HR) and Her 2/neu (HER 2), we retrospectively investigated whether our series responded to the regimens used after TX resistance was acquired. As post TX-resistance therapy (trastuzumab was combined in HER2-positive patients), 387 treatment regimens were administered to 166 patients. The following regimens achieved a response rate (patients achieving PR or CR/patients who could be evaluated) of 10% or more: combination therapy with TX and capecitabine (11/61, 18%), CPT-11 (10/57, 17.5%), vinorelbine (5/46, 10.9%), MFL-P (continuous treatment with MTX, 5-FU, LV, and CDDP) (12/47, 25.5%), and DMpC (5'-DFUR, MPA, CPA p.o.) (5/16, 31.2%). The latter 2 regimens achieved a high response rate,and some HR (-) and HER 2 (-) patients also responded to these regimens. In HR (+) or HER 2 (+) patients who responded to TX, survival was longer than that of non-responders. However, there was no difference in the treatment responsiveness of post-TX regimens between TX-responders and non-responders, suggesting the survival-prolonging effect of TX.     

Using bevacizumab with different chemotherapeutic regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: balancing utility with low toxicity

The addition of bevacizumab to currently available treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer has changed the traditional chemotherapy-based paradigm. In this review we cover published clinical trials pertaining to the toxicity and efficacy of bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. Several randomized trials have studied combinations of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine with bevacizumab. Efficacy in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival has been improved to varying degrees with the addition of bevacizumab. Bevacizumab's distinctive toxicity profile has been well demonstrated in these trials, and has been shown to be manageable. However, certain patient groups, such as the elderly, may require particular toxicity considerations with bevacizumab. The optimal timing, dose and duration of bevacizumab-containing therapy have yet to be fully determined. Further randomized data, particularly for patients with potentially resectable liver metastases, are required in order to fully define the role of bevacizumab in the increasingly complex management paradigm for this disease.     

A pilot genome-wide association study of early-onset breast cancer

High-density oligonucleotide microarrays containing a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have enabled genome-wide association (GWA) analysis to become a reality. We used the early access Affymetrix Mendel Nsp 250K chips in a GWA case–control pilot study to identify genomic regions associated with breast cancer. We included 30 randomly sampled incident invasive breast cancer cases aged <45 years without deleterious mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, and 30 population controls individually matched on age, ethnicity and geographical area. The overall genotype call rate was 97.13 ± 1.33% for controls and 97.48 ± 1.42% for cases. Comparison was made between cases and controls for 203,477 genotyped SNPs using (a) unconditional logistic regression (ULR), (b) conditional logistic regression (CLR) models with adjustment for the matched pairs, (c) allelic tests for single marker tests and (d) haplotype trend regression (HTR). Genomic control and EIGENSTRAT methods were used for correction of population stratification in appropriate models. We demonstrate the similarity and dissimilarity of results from different statistical analyses. We found several possible significant regions harboring biologically meaningful known candidate genes, such as genes encoding fibroblast growth factor, transforming growth factor, epidermal growth factor, and estrogen synthesis enzymes to be associated with early-onset breast cancer. In single marker analysis, none of the SNPs were statistically significant after correction for multiple testing. However, haplotype association tests, using 90730 tag-SNPs, suggested two regions in GLG1 and UGT1 genes retaining significance even after Bonferroni correction. Nevertheless, without systematic replication, findings from this pilot study, especially the associations of breast cancer in relation to specific SNPs, should be interpreted with great caution.     

A randomized phase II study of sequential docetaxel and doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel has yielded promising response rates as a component of doxorubicin-based combination schedules in patients with metastatic breast cancer, including docetaxel/doxorubicin and docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC). This randomized two-stage phase II study was conducted to evaluate sequential treatment with docetaxel and AC as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients were randomized to either docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for three cycles followed by AC (60/600 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for three cycles (n = 17) or vice-versa (n = 16), without prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. In addition, we compared pre-treatment serum sErbB1 and sErbB2 protein concentrations with that of an age- and menopausal status-matched group of healthy women, and examined changes in serum sErbB1 and sErbB2 protein concentrations in these two treatment schedules. Data from each one of the two arms of the trial (docetaxel then AC, or AC and then docetaxel) were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Enrollment was suspended after the first-stage of accrual, based on statistical design. Confirmed objective response rates after six cycles of treatment were 35% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14% to 62%] with docetaxel then AC and 38% (95% CI 15% to 65%) with AC then docetaxel. Dose reductions were frequent and mostly due to grade 4 neutropenia. Median survival time was 2.5 years in the docetaxel then AC group, and 1.1 years in the AC then docetaxel group. Serum sErbB1 concentrations were not significantly different between the study patients and healthy women, and did not change significantly after three and six cycles of treatment. In contrast, serum sErbB2 concentrations were significantly higher in the study patients compared with healthy women and tended to decrease after three and six cycles of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Response rates at the end of six cycles of treatment, which led to termination of accrual after the first stage using either the sequence of docetaxel first or docetaxel after AC chemotherapy, were lower than anticipated. However, median survival times and median progression-free survival times are similar to those reported in other studies. These data further suggest that additional studies to assess whether serum sErbB2 concentrations are useful predictors of responsiveness to chemotherapy are warranted.