Chromosomal radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients: influence of age of onset of the disease

The age dependency of onset of the disease on chromosomal radiosensitivity of an unselected group of breast cancer patients (n=100) was investigated and compared to a group of healthy women (n=100). The chromosomal radiosensitivity was assessed with the G2 and the G0 micro-nucleus (MN) assay. For the G2 assay lymphocytes were irradiated in vitro with a dose of 0.4 Gy 60Co gamma-rays after 70 h incubation and chromatid breaks were scored in 50 metaphases. For the G0 MN assay lymphocytes were exposed in vitro to 3.5 Gy 60Co gamma-rays at low dose rate (LDR). 72 h post-irradiation cultures were arrested and micronuclei were scored in 1000 binucleate cells. The results demonstrated that the group of breast cancer patients was more radiosensitive than a population of healthy women and this with both the G2 and the G0 MN assay. Analyses of the G2 and MN response in different age groups of the breast cancer patients revealed no significant differences in mean G2 and MN scores and suggest that the age of onset of the disease has no effect on chromosomal radiosensitivity in unselected breast cancer patients. Correlations with different clinical parameters were also investigated.     

Relationship between in vitro chromosomal radiosensitivity of peripheral blood lymphocytes and the expression of normal tissue damage following radiotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a need for rapid and reliable tests for the prediction of normal tissue responses to radiotherapy, as this could lead to individualization of patient radiotherapy schedules and thus improvements in the therapeutic ratio. Because the use of cultured fibroblasts is too slow to be practicable in a clinical setting, we evaluated the predictive role of assays of lymphocyte chromosomal radiosensitivity in patients having radiotherapy for breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiosensitivity was assessed using a micronucleus (MN) assay at high dose rate (HDR) and low dose rate (LDR) on lymphocytes irradiated in the G(0) phase of the cell cycle (Scott D, Barber JB, Levine EL, Burril W, Roberts SA. Radiation-induced micronucleus induction in lymphocytes identifies a frequency of radiosensitive cases among breast cancer patients: a test for predispostion? Br. J. Cancer 1998;77;614-620) and an assay of G(2) phase chromatid radiosensitivity ('G(2) assay') (Scott D, Spreadborough A, Levine E, Roberts SA. Genetic predisposition in breast cancer. Lancet 1994; 344: 1444). In a study of acute reactions, blood samples were taken from breast cancer patients before the start of radiotherapy, and the skin reaction documented. 116 patients were tested with the HDR MN assay, 73 with the LDR MN assay and 123 with the G(2) assay. In a study of late reactions, samples were taken from a series of breast cancer patients 8-14 years after radiotherapy and the patients assessed for the severity of late effects according to the'LENT SOMA' scales. 47 were tested with the HDR assay, 26 with the LDR assay and 19 with the G(2) assay. For each clinical endpoint, patients were classified as being normal reactors or 'highly radiosensitive patients' (HR patients (Burnet NG. Johansen J, Turesson I, Nyman J. Describing patients' normal tissue reactions: Concerning the possiblity of individualising radiotherapy dose presciptions based on potential predictive assays of normal tissue radiosensitivity. Int. J. Cancer 1998;79:606-613)). RESULTS: The HR patients could be identified in some of the assays. For example, for acute skin reactions, 9/123 patients were judged as HR; they had significantly higher G(2) scores than normal reactors (P=0.004). For the late reactions, the mean HDR MN scores were higher for the 4/47 patients who had severe telangiectasia (P=0.042) and the 8/47 patients had severe fibrosis (P=0.055). However, there were no trends towards increased chromosomal radiosensitivity with the micronucleus scores at HDR or LDR, or with G(2) chromosomal radiosensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: While these results support the concept of using lymphocytes to detect elevated sensitivity to radiotherapy (as an alternative to fibroblasts), these assays are unlikely to be of assistance for the prediction of normal tissue effects in the clinic in their present form.     

外周血淋巴细胞松胞素阻滞微核法预测鼻咽癌放射敏感性的临床和实验研究

目的探讨用外周血松胞素阻滞微核法来预测鼻咽癌放射敏感性的可行性。方法前瞻性研究42例鼻咽癌患者放疗前照射0,0.5,1,2,4Gy的外周血,放疗20Gy、60Gy时的外周血行松胞素阻滞微核法检测微核率、微核细胞率,统计分析正常组织敏感组与不敏感组间、鼻咽肿瘤组织局控组与残留组间微核率、微核细胞率、50Gy鼻咽肿瘤消退率等指标有无差异,并分析这些指标间的相互关系。结果在体外照射1Gy及以上剂量、20Gy、60Gy时外周血微核率、微核细胞率在放射敏感组明显比不敏感组增加,在体外照射2Gy及以上剂量、20Gy、60Gy时外周血微核率、微核细胞率在肿瘤局控组比未局控组明显增加。结论外周血淋巴细胞松胞素阻滞微核法有可能作为预测鼻咽癌皮肤、黏膜急性反应敏感性的指标。外周血淋巴细胞微核率、微核细胞率有可能作为预测鼻咽癌根治性放疗近期疗效的指标。     

Radiation-induced micronucleus induction in lymphocytes identifies a high frequency of radiosensitive cases among breast cancer patients: a test for predisposition?

Enhanced sensitivity to the chromosome-damaging effects of ionizing radiation is a feature of many cancer-predisposing conditions. We previously showed that 42% of an unselected series of breast cancer patients and 9% of healthy control subjects showed elevated chromosomal radiosensitivity of lymphocytes irradiated in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. We suggested that, in addition to the highly penetrant genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, which confer a very high risk of breast cancer and are carried by about 5% of all breast cancer patients, there are also low-penetrance predisposing genes carried by a much higher proportion of breast cancer patients, a view supported by recent epidemiological studies. Ideally, testing for the presence of these putative genes should involve the use of simpler methods than the G2 assay, which requires metaphase analysis of chromosome damage. Here we report on the use of a simple, rapid micronucleus assay in G0 lymphocytes exposed to high dose rate (HDR) or low dose rate gamma-irradiation, with delayed mitogenic stimulation. Good assay reproducibility was obtained, particularly with the HDR protocol, which identified 31% (12 out of 39) of breast cancer patients compared with 5% (2 out of 42) of healthy controls as having elevated radiation sensitivity. In the long term, such cytogenetic assays may have the potential for selecting women for intensive screening for breast cancer.     

Chromosomal radiosensitivity in head and neck cancer patients: evidence for genetic predisposition?

The association between chromosomal radiosensitivity and genetic predisposition to head and neck cancer was investigated in this study. In all, 101 head and neck cancer patients and 75 healthy control individuals were included in the study. The G(2) assay was used to measure chromosomal radiosensitivity. The results demonstrated that head and neck cancer patients had a statistically higher number of radiation-induced chromatid breaks than controls, with mean values of 1.23 and 1.10 breaks per cell, respectively (P<0.001). Using the 90th percentile of the G(2) scores of the healthy individuals as a cutoff value for chromosomal radiosensitivity, 26% of the cancer patients were radiosensitive compared with 9% of the healthy controls (P=0.008). The mean number of radiation-induced chromatid breaks and the proportion of radiosensitive individuals were highest for oral cavity cancer patients (1.26 breaks per cell, 38%) and pharynx cancer patients (1.27 breaks per cell, 35%). The difference between patients and controls was most pronounced in the lower age group (相似文献   

Chromosomal radiosensitivity in two cell lineages derived from clinically radiosensitive cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Despite its prominent contribution to cancer cure and palliation, around 1% to 5% of cancer patients suffer serious side effects from radiotherapy. A cardinal goal in the fields of radiobiology and oncology is to predict normal tissue radiosensitivity of a cancer patient before radiotherapy. Higher tumor control rates are likely if radiotherapy individualization could be achieved by applying predictive approaches. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Here, we make use of the cytokinesis block micronucleus assay to assess radiosensitivity in cell lines derived from two different cell lineages obtained from clinically radiosensitive patients. We determined the micronucleus frequency after graded doses of ionizing radiation to primary fibroblasts and lymphoblast cell lines derived from 36 highly radiosensitive cancer patients. RESULTS: Many cell lines, following exposure to ionizing radiation, from patients with severe clinical reactions to radiotherapy showed statistically significantly higher frequencies of micronuclei than those from patients who had normal reactions to radiotherapy. One individual revealed significantly higher micronucleus frequencies in both cell lineages. Interestingly, lymphoblast cell lines from one patient showed micronucleus frequencies similar to ataxia telangiectasia mutated-deficient cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the micronucleus assay may have use for identifying predisposition to clinical radiosensitivity, at least in a subset of patients as a component of a pretreatment radiosensitivity assay for use in the clinic.     

G(2) chromosomal radiosensitivity in Danish survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer and their offspring

In order to investigate the relationship between chromosomal radiosensitivity and early-onset cancer, the G(2) chromosomal radiosensitivity assay was undertaken on a group of 23 Danish survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer, a control group comprising their partners and a group of 38 of their offspring. In addition, the previously reported in-house control group from Westlakes Research Institute (WRI) was extended to 27 individuals. When using the 90th percentile cutoff for the WRI control group, the proportion of individuals with elevated radiosensitivity was 11, 35, 52 and 53% for the WRI control, partner control, cancer survivor and the offspring groups, respectively, with significant differences between the WRI control group and the cancer survivor group (P=0.002) and the offspring group (P<0.001). However, while the comparisons with the WRI control group support an association of chromosomal radiosensitivity with cancer predisposition, when the partner control group was used to define the radiosensitivity cutoff point, no significant differences in radiosensitivity profiles were found between the partner control group and either the cancer survivor group or the offspring group. The failure to distinguish between the G(2) aberration profiles of the apparently normal group of partners and the cancer survivor group suggests that any association with cancer should be viewed with caution, but also raises questions as to the suitability of the partners of cancer survivors to act as an appropriate control group. Heritability of the radiosensitive phenotype was examined by segregation analysis of the Danish families and suggested that 67.3% of the phenotypic variance of G(2) chromosomal radiosensitivity is attributable to a putative major gene locus with dominant effect.     

The increment of micronucleus frequency in cervical carcinoma during irradiation in vivo and its prognostic value for tumour radiocurability.

A potential usefulness of micronucleus assay for prediction of tumour radiosensitivity has been tested in 64 patients with advanced stage (II B-IV B) cervical carcinoma treated by radiotherapy. The study of cellular radiosensitivity in vitro was conducted in parallel with the study of cellular damage after tumour irradiation in vivo. Radiosensitivity of in vitro cultured primary cells isolated from tumour biopsies taken before radiotherapy was evaluated using cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Frequency of micronuclei per binucleated cell (MN/BNC) at 2 Gy was used as a measure of radiosensitivity. Radiation sensitivity in vivo was expressed as per cent increment of micronucleus frequency in cells isolated from biopsy taken after 20 Gy (external irradiation, 10 x 2 Gy) over the pre-treatment spontaneous micronucleus level and was called MN20. Very low correlation (r = 0.324) was observed between micronucleus frequency in vitro and in vivo. Although micronucleus frequency at 2 Gy differed widely between tumours evaluated (mean MN/BNC was 0.224; range 0.08-0.416), no significant correlation was observed between this parameter and clinical outcome. The average increment of micronucleus frequency after 20 Gy amounted to 193% of spontaneous level (range 60-610%) and was independent of spontaneous micronucleation before radiotherapy. In contrast to in vitro results, these from in vivo assay seem to have a predictive value for radiotherapy of cervix cancer. The micronucleus increment in vivo that reached at least 117.5% of pretreatment value (first quartile for MN20 data set) correlated significantly with better tumour local control (P < 0.008) and overall survival (P < 0.045). Our results suggest that evaluation of increment of micronucleus frequency during radiotherapy (after fixed tested dose of 20 Gy) offers a potentially valuable approach to predicting individual radioresponsiveness and may be helpful for individualization of treatment strategy in advanced stage cervical cancer.     

Effects of ionizing radiation on cells from Fanconi's anemia patients

The lymphocytes from some Fanconi's anemia patients appeared to be more radiosensitive than normal as measured by the number of X-ray-(or bleomycin-) induced chromosome aberrations seen following G2 treatment. Fibroblasts from the same patients, however, all showed the same degree of colony survival as normals following exposure to gamma-rays [Do, 1.13 +/- 0.072 (S.E.) Gy and 1.14 +/- 0.077 Gy for Fanconi's anemia and normal fibroblasts, respectively]. The lack of increased radiosensitivity in Fanconi's fibroblasts was also observed by the same degree of inhibition of DNA synthesis as seen in normals following gamma-irradiation. The results show clearly that there is no increase in radiosensitivity common to all cell types from Fanconi's patients, although an apparent increase in chromosomal radiosensitivity may be seen in the lymphocytes from an occasional patient.     

Individual radiosensitivity measured with lymphocytes may be used to predict the risk of fibrosis after radiotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To analyse the relationship of individual cellular radiosensitivity and fibrosis after breast conserving therapy. A new model was used describing the percentage of patients developing fibrosis per year and per patient at risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, 86 patients were included, who had undergone breast conserving surgery and irradiation of the breast with a median dose of 55 Gy (54-55 Gy) given at 2.5 Gy/fraction (n=57) or 2 Gy/fraction (n=29). Median age was 62 years (range 44-86) and median follow-up was 7.5 years (range 5-17). Patients were examined for fibrosis according to the LENT/SOMA score. For analysis, fibrosis was classified as grade 0 and grade 1 (G0-1) or present grade 2 and grade 3 (G2-3). The time to complete development of fibrosis was determined by analysis of yearly mammograms. Individual cellular radiosensitivity was determined by scoring lethal chromosomal aberrations in in vitro irradiated (6 Gy) lymphocytes using metaphase technique. Patients with low/intermediate cellular radiosensitivity were compared with patients with high cellular radiosensitivity using actuarial methods. RESULTS: Ten patients developed fibrosis at 1-8 years after radiotherapy. Individual cellular radiosensitivity was described by normal distribution of lethal chromosomal aberrations, the average was 5.47 lethal aberrations per cell (standard deviation (SD) 0.71). Cellular radiosensitivity was defined as low/intermediate (< or =6.18 lethal aberrations) in 73 patients and high (>6.18 lethal aberrations; mean+SD) in 13 patients. In both groups, the actuarial rate of fibrosis-free patients decreased exponentially with time after radiotherapy. Patients with high cellular radiosensitivity showed a 2.3-fold higher annual rate for fibrosis than patients with intermediate and low radiosensitivity (3.6 versus 1.6% per year). CONCLUSIONS: In breast cancer patients, high individual cellular radiosensitivity as determined by the number of lethal chromosome aberrations in in vitro irradiated lymphocytes might be associated with an enhanced annual rate of fibrosis.     

Does skin fibroblast radiosensitivity predict squamous cancer cell radiosensitivity of the same individual?

Individualization of radiation doses is presumed to result in better radiotherapy outcome. Success rate in measuring radiosensitivity is probably the most limiting factor for present radiosensitivity assays to be introduced into clinical routine. To find a simpler predictive parameter, we compared the radiosensitivity of dermal fibroblasts and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cell lines established from the same individuals. The radiosensitivity was tested using the clonogenic 96-well plate assay. The surviving fraction at 2.0 Gy (SF2) was determined, as well as the mean inactivation dose (AUC) of cancer cells. SF2 of SCC cell lines and skin fibroblasts were 0.25-0.44 and 0.11-0.43, respectively. AUC of SCC cells was 1.4-2.1 Gy. Dermal fibroblasts were more radiosensitive than SCC cells in 14 of 15 cases. In 1 patient (UT-SCC-8), cancer cells were found to be more radiosensitive than corresponding dermal fibroblasts. There was a clear tendency to a correlation between radiosensitivities of these 2 cell types, but statistical significance was reached only when the data of UT-SCC-8 was excluded. In our material, the intrinsic radiosensitivity of head and neck SCC cells could in most cases be predicted from the intrinsic radiosensitivity of dermal fibroblasts established from the same individual.     

Chromosomal radiosensitivity as a marker of predisposition to common cancers?

We previously found that 40% of breast cancer patients showed enhanced sensitivity to X-ray induced chromosome damage in G(2)lymphocytes and suggested that this might indicate a low penetrance predisposition to breast cancer, for which there is good epidemiological evidence. We have now tested the hypothesis that elevated G(2)radiosensitivity is a marker of such predisposition to other common cancers. We tested patients with colorectal cancer, for which there is also good epidemiological evidence of inherited risk in a substantial proportion of cases, and patients with cancers having a strong environmental aetiology (lung and cervix). We also repeated our study of breast cancer cases and tested patients with chronic diseases other than cancer. The results support our hypothesis, in that 30% (12/37) of colorectal cases showed enhanced sensitivity compared with 9% (6/66) of normal healthy controls (P = 0.01), whereas the proportions of sensitive cervix (11%, 3/27, P = 0.72) and lung cancer cases (23%, 8/35, P = 0.07) were not significantly above normals. We confirmed the enhanced sensitivity of 40% (12/31, P = 0.001) of breast cancer patients and found that patients with non-malignant disease had a normal response in the assay (12%, 4/34, P = 0.73). We suggest that enhanced G(2)chromosomal radiosensitivity is a consequence of inherited defects in the ability of cells to process DNA damage from endogenous or exogenous sources, of a type that is mimicked by ionizing radiation, and that such defects predispose to breast and colorectal cancer.     

Measurements using the alkaline comet assay predict bladder cancer cell radiosensitivity

In the UK, the two main treatments of invasive bladder cancer are radiotherapy or cystectomy. However, approximately 50% of patients undergoing radiotherapy fail to respond. If tumour radiosensitivity could be predicted in advance, it may be possible to improve control rates significantly by selecting for radiotherapy those patients whose tumours are radiosensitive. Additionally, patients who would benefit from surgery would be identified earlier. The alkaline comet assay (ACA) is a sensitive method for the detection of DNA strand break damage in cells. In the present study, using six bladder cancer cell lines of differing radiosensitivities, cell survival was compared to the manifestation of radiogenic DNA damage as assessed by ACA. For all the cell lines, the extent of comet formation strongly correlates with cell killing (R2>0.96), with a greater response being noted in radiosensitive cells. In repair studies, measures of residual damage correlate with survival fraction at 2 Gy (R2>0.96), but for only five of the cell lines. Finally, cells from human bladder tumour biopsies reveal a wide range of predicted radiosensitivies as determined by ACA. Overall, these studies demonstrate ACA to be a good predictive measure of bladder cancer cell radiosensitivity at low dose, with potential clinical application.     

Individual radiosensitivity measured with lymphocytes may predict the risk of acute reaction after radiotherapy

PURPOSE: We tested whether the chromosomal radiosensitivity of in vitro irradiated lymphocytes could be used to predict the risk of acute reactions after radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two prospective studies were performed: study A with 51 patients included different tumor sites and study B included 87 breast cancer patients. Acute reaction was assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group score. In both studies, patients were treated with curative radiotherapy, and the mean tumor dose applied was 55 Gy (40-65) +/- boost with 11 Gy (6-31) in study A and 50.4 Gy +/- boost with 10 Gy in study B. Individual radiosensitivity was determined with lymphocytes irradiated in vitro with X-ray doses of either 3 or 6 Gy and scoring the number of chromosomal deletions. RESULTS: Acute reactions displayed a typical spectrum with 57% in study A and 53% in study B showing an acute reaction of Grade 2-3. Individual radiosensitivity in both studies was characterized by a substantial variation and the fraction of patients with Grade 2-3 reaction was found to increase with increasing individual radiosensitivity measured at 6 Gy (study A, p = 0.238; study B, p = 0.023). For study B, this fraction increased with breast volume, and the impact of individual radiosensitivity on acute reaction was especially pronounced (p = 0.00025) for lower breast volume. No such clear association with acute reaction was observed when individual radiosensitivity was assessed at 3 Gy. CONCLUSION: Individual radiosensitivity determined at 6 Gy seems to be a good predictor for risk of acute effects after curative radiotherapy.     

Radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in lymphocytes from breast cancer patients and their correlation with acute skin reactions to radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Repair of radiation-induced DNA damage plays a critical role for both the susceptibility of patients to side effects after radiotherapy and their subsequent cancer risk. The study objective was to evaluate whether DNA repair data determined in vitro are correlated with the occurrence of acute side effects during radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Breast cancer patients receiving radiation therapy after a breast-conserving surgery were recruited in a prospective epidemiologic study. As an indicator for clinical radiosensitivity, adverse reactions of the skin were recorded. Cryo-preserved lymphocytes from 113 study participants were gamma-irradiated with 5 Gy in vitro and analyzed using the alkaline comet assay. Reproducibility of the assay was determined by repeated analysis (n = 26) of cells from a healthy donor. A coefficient of variation of 0.3 was calculated. RESULTS: The various parameters determined to characterize the individual DNA repair capacity showed large differences between patients. Eleven patients were identified with considerably enhanced DNA damage induction, and 7 patients exhibited severely reduced DNA repair capacity after 15 and 30 min. Six patients were considered as clinically radiosensitive, indicated by moist desquamation of the skin after a total radiation dose of about 50 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Using the alkaline comet assay as described here, breast cancer patients were identified showing abnormal cellular radiation effects, but this repair deficiency corresponded only at a very limited extent to the acute radiation sensitivity of the skin. Because impaired DNA repair could be involved in the development of late irradiation effects, individuals exhibiting severely reduced DNA repair capacity should be followed for the development of late clinical symptoms.     

Ovarian cancer: radiation sensitivity in vitro

The radiosensitivity of four human ovarian cancer cell lines was investigated in vitro by a clonogenic assay and analyzed using the linear-quadratic model. Two cell lines were found to be highly radiosensitive (mean inactivation dose (D) 0.82-0.92 Gy; surviving fraction 2 Gy (SF2) less than or equal to 0.13). Two other cell lines were less sensitive to radiation (D 1.31-1.94 Gy; SF2 0.22-0.38). Although the use of external radiotherapy in ovarian cancer has been limited due to the pattern of metastatic spread of this cancer, the present data support the view that ovarian carcinomas are radiosensitive tumors. Investigations on the effects of new approaches, such as delivering radiation more specifically to intraperitoneal ovarian cancer cells, are warranted.     

Telomere length abnormalities in mammalian radiosensitive cells

Telomere lengths in radiosensitive murine lymphoma cells L5178Y-S and parental radioresistant L5178Y cells were measured by quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results revealed a 7-fold reduction in telomere length in radiosensitive cells (7 kb) in comparison with radioresistant cells (48 kb). Therefore, it was reasoned that telomere length might be used as a marker for chromosomal radiosensitivity. In agreement with this hypothesis, a significant inverse correlation between telomere length and chromosomal radiosensitivity was observed in lymphocytes from 24 breast cancer patients and 5 normal individuals. In contrast, no chromosomal radiosensitivity was observed in mouse cell lines that showed shortened telomeres, possibly reflecting differences in radiation responses between primary cells and established cell lines. Telomere length abnormalities observed in radiosensitive cells suggest that these two phenotypes may be linked.     

Enhanced chromosomal radiosensitivity in peripheral blood lymphocytes of larynx cancer patients

PURPOSE: The chromosomal radiosensitivity in peripheral blood lymphocytes of cancer patients was reported to be higher than that of healthy donors. This effect is especially prominent when aberrations induced in the G2 phase of the cell cycle are analyzed. The aim of our study was to investigate if the G2 aberration frequencies in lymphocytes of patients with larynx cancer are higher than in the case of control individuals. Also, we tested if the frequencies of G2 aberrations correlate with side effects of radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Peripheral blood of 38 patients was collected before the onset of radiotherapy, cultured for 72 h, and irradiated with 2 Gy after 67 h. Lymphocytes of 40 healthy donors were treated in the same way. RESULTS: The spontaneous and radiation-induced aberration frequencies in lymphocytes of patients were on average higher than in those of healthy donors. No statistically significant correlation was observed between aberration frequencies in lymphocytes and the degree of both early and late normal tissue reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The chromosomal radiosensitivity of lymphocytes of patients with larynx cancer may be a marker of cancer predisposition; however, it does not appear to have a predictive value for the risk of developing side effects to radiotherapy.     

Investigating the Vinblastine Induced-Chromosomal Abnormality in the Already Gamma Irradiated L929 Cell Line Using Micronucleus Assay in Cytokinesis Blocked Binucleated Cells

Objectives: Vast number of studies show the relationship between aneuploidy and cancer. Ionizing radiation inaddition to induce all kinds of damages to the cells and structure of chromosomes, is also able to induce aneuploidythrough direct damages to chromosome division apparatus. Also irradiation of the cells induces mutations in severalgenes which might be involved in cell division fidelity and play a role in reversing the effect of aneugens. Therefore,irradiation of cells and tissues might produce sensitivity to agents with aneugenic capability in irradiated cells. Methods:To investigate the persistent genomic effect of ionizing irradiation on chromosomal instability, L929 cells were gammairradiated with the dose of 2 Gy. Cells were left to recover from the harmful effect of irradiation. They were treated withlow dose of vinblastine (0.5 ng.ml-1) 72h post-gamma irradiation. Finally, the induced chromosomal abnormalitieswere scored using micronucleus assay in cytokinesis-blocked binucleated cells (MnBi). Results: Irradiation-recoveredL929 cells treated with vinblastine showed a statistically higher frequency of MnBi compared to non-irradiated andvinblastine treated cells. Conclusion: The results indicate that gamma irradiation, in addition to direct induction ofchromosomal damages, is also able to create persisting genomic sensitivity in the cells to chromosomal instability,which is detectable when exposed to the second stimulus.     

Absence of mutations in the ATM gene in breast cancer patients with severe responses to radiotherapy.

The effectiveness of cancer radiotherapy is compromised by the small proportion (approximately 5%) of patients who sustain severe normal tissue damage after standard radiotherapy treatments. Predictive tests are required to identify these highly radiosensitive cases. Patients with the rare, recessively inherited, cancer-prone syndrome ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) sustain extremely severe normal tissue necrosis after radiotherapy and their cultured cells are also highly radiosensitive. Clinically normal carriers (heterozygotes) of the A-T gene have an increased risk of breast cancer, account for approximately 4% of all breast cancer cases and show a modest increase in cellular radiosensitivity in vitro. It has been suggested that a substantial proportion of highly radiosensitive (HR) breast cancer patients may be A-T heterozygotes, and that screening for mutations in the A-T gene could be used as a predictive test. We have tested this hypothesis in a group of cancer patients who showed adverse reactions to radiotherapy. Sixteen HR breast cancer patients showing mainly acute reactions (and seven HR patients with other cancers) were tested for ATM mutations using the restriction endonuclease fingerprinting assay. No mutations typical of those found in obligate A-T heterozygotes were detected. If the estimate that 4% of breast cancer cases are A-T gene carriers is correct, then ATM mutations do not confer clinical radiosensitivity. These early results suggest that screening for ATM mutations in cancer patients may not be of value in predicting adverse reactions.