Validation of a Gyrolab™ assay for quantification of rituximab in human serum

IntroductionGyrolab? technology presents a technology breakthrough for large molecule bioanalysis to support biologic drug development. The advantages of this innovative platform include fully automated nanoscale immunoassay capability, better assay reproducibility and data quality, small reagent and sample volumes, and rapid assay development and validation as a result of reduced run time. Although Gyrolab has been increasingly used in method development in discovery environment, few fully validated Gyrolab assays have been reported. Here we report a method validation of a Gyrolab assay to determine rituximab levels in human serum.MethodsRituximab is captured on a Bioaffy? CD by a biotinylated rat anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody against rituximab and detected by an Alexa Fluor®-labeled anti-human IgG antibody. Assay conditions were optimized to give required sensitivity and dynamic range. The assay validation was conducted according to the current industry standards for GLP-regulated immunoassays.ResultsThe intrabatch precision and accuracy for the assay were determined using spiked human serum samples and shown to have a coefficient of variation (CV) of < 11% with a mean bias < 20%. The interbatch precision (CV) and absolute mean bias were both < 12% with the total error < 25%. Adequate spike recovery was demonstrated in serum samples of healthy individuals and solid tumor patients. The dilutional linearity test showed that the determined concentrations adjusted with various dilution factors had a linear relationship with the expected concentrations and that there was no hook effect. The method has been validated for the quantification of rituximab in human serum from 90 to 60,000 ng/mL with a minimum required dilution of 30.DiscussionThe Gyrolab assay was proved to be accurate, precise and selective, with a comparable sensitivity to the ELISA method, but provided an automated nanoscale assay with a significantly wider assay dynamic range for the determination of rituximab in human serum during pharmacokinetics/toxicokinetics studies.     

Singlicate Ligand Binding Assay Using an Automated Microfluidic System: a Clinical Case Study

The bioanalytical strategy for monoclonal antibody therapeutics, intended for multiple oncology indications, includes multiple integrated measurements of pharmacologically relevant therapeutics from discovery through development. Three ligand binding assays were cohesively developed and validated, as applicable, using the Gyrolab microfluidic system for the measurement of a free monoclonal antibody BMS-986207. Accuracy and precision demonstrate %bias from ?6.3 to 4.4%, percent coefficient of variation (%CV) from 2.6 to 9.8%, and total error from 4.2 to 13.4% in the nonclinical assay; %bias from ?0.3 to 3.3%, %CV from 3.5 to 18.2%, and total error from 6.1 to 19.7% in the clinical assay; and >97% of the sample meeting incurred sample reanalysis criteria. The clinical assay was validated using singlicate wells after gaining significant data in the early phase studies to support this cost-effective and efficient strategy. Each assay met fit-for-purpose and/or regulated bioanalytical method validation criteria including stability, selectivity, dilutional linearity, carryover, and specificity criteria with no interference from co-administered monoclonal antibody.     

Ligand-binding assays: risk of using a platform supported by a single vendor

The use of biological reagents in ligand-binding assays (LBAs) presents inherent challenges when measuring the concentration of large molecules in complex matrices. As a result, there are relatively few platforms that provide the accuracy, precision and robustness needed to determine the concentration of macromolecular therapies and biomarkers, and demonstrate the presence or absence of an immune response. Some bioanalytical laboratories use only one LBA platform to reduce costs, increase efficiency and maintain optimal assay performance. However, the business and regulatory risks of using a single platform supported by only one vendor should be considered. This article summarizes the immunological methods used to support bioanalysis for large molecules that are supported by a single vendor, the benefits of being dedicated to a single platform for bioanalysis used for regulatory filings, the costs associated with restructuring if an immunoassay platform is discontinued and recommendations to mitigate risk when using LBAs in drug development. The experience with the recent discontinuation of the BioVeris? electrochemiluminescent-based platform is discussed.     

Large Molecule Run Acceptance: Recommendation for Best Practices and Harmonization from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Team

The L1 Global Harmonization Team provides recommendations specifically for run acceptance of ligand binding methods used in bioanalysis of macromolecules in support of pharmacokinetics. The team focused on standard curve calibrators and quality controls for use in both pre-study validation and in-study sample analysis, including their preparation and acceptance criteria. The team also considered standard curve editing and the concept of total error.     

Application of the Gyrolab™ platform to ligand-binding assays: a user's perspective

In many areas of drug discovery and development, scientists are in a constant search for methods and platforms to reduce assay time and cost. The Gyrolab? microfluidics platform that we describe here promises to deliver faster ligand-binding assays with lower reagent and sample consumption, while maintaining good accuracy and precision. Due to its limited track record, we evaluated its performance on assays currently used to support pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity studies, and detection of host cell protein impurities in samples from biotechnology processes. This article summarizes our preliminary conclusions about the utility of the Gyrolab microfluidics platform from Gyros AB.     

A Gyrolab Assay for the Quantitation of Free Complement Protein C5a in Human Plasma

Complement protein C5a is recognized as an important component of the alternative complement pathway. Its role is prominent enough to garner interest not only as a biomarker, but also as a potential therapeutic target. Bioanalytical challenges have been posed in proper quantitation of free C5a due to interference from its precursor, C5. Additionally, free therapeutic target quantitation can be difficult due to effects of sample dilution and prolonged sample incubation when therapeutic is used as capture reagent. Gyrolab technology enables quantitation of free target analyte with minimal sample dilution and rapid sample incubations, thus enabling in vitro results that are more representative of in vivo pharmacodynamics. When coupled with strategic sample pretreatment, Gyrolab offers an opportunity to quantitate free C5a in human plasma with an assay that vastly diminishes C5 interference. A Gyrolab assay for the quantitation of free C5a in human plasma was developed and validated. Validation results confirmed that proper sample pretreatment and use of the Gyrolab platform yield accurate and reliable results. Due to the advantages that it provides, Gyrolab has become our default technology of choice for quantitation of free target.     

Assay Formats: Recommendation for Best Practices and Harmonization from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Team

As part of the GBC (Global Bioanalysis Consortium), the L3 assay format team has focused on reviewing common platforms used to support ligand binding assays in the detection of biotherapeutics. The following review is an overview of discussions and presentations from around the globe with a group of experts from different companies to allow an international harmonization of common practices and suggestions for different platforms. Some of the major platforms include Gyrolab, Erenna, RIA, AlphaLISA, Delfia, Immuno-PCR, Luminex, BIAcore, and ELISAs. The review is meant to support bioanalysts in taking decisions between different platforms depending on the needs of the analyte with a number of recommendations to help integration of platforms into a GLP environment.     

'Large Meets Small': connecting the bioanalytical community around peptide and protein bioanalysis with LC-MS(/MS)

This conference report provides an overview of the discussions at the 2nd European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF) Focus Meeting 'Large Meets Small' held on 20 and 21 June 2011 in Brussels. The meeting discussed scientific progress in the bioanalysis of peptides and proteins with MS-based techniques. Bioanalytical experts in ligand-binding assays (LBAs) and MS from industry and academia presented at the meeting or joined the discussion. The conference hosted sessions on technology developments, validation requirements, cutting edge (bio)analytical approaches for both proteins and peptides and discussions on the analytical challenge presented by the metabolism of peptides or proteins. The engagement of the scientists as well as the bioanalytical challenges identified were real: by shifting peptide or protein analysis from the LBAs laboratory into the LC-MS laboratory, the bioanalytical scientist is moving into partially uncharted territory. The conference delegates strongly shared the feeling that success in overcoming the challenges of peptide and protein bioanalysis will require further integration of the expertise of LBAs and LC-MS/MS experts.     

Applications of a planar electrochemiluminescence platform to support regulated studies of macromolecules: Benefits and limitations in assay range

Development and validation of ligand binding methods that can measure therapeutic antibodies (TA) accurately and precisely are essential for bioanalysis that supports regulated pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicokinetic (TK) studies. Non-bead (planar) electrochemiluminescence (ECL) methods are known to have high sensitivity and a wide assay range and are therefore potentially useful in supporting research studies in the early phases of development as well as for diagnostic fields and multiplex biomarker applications. Here, we demonstrate the applications for using ECL for regulated studies associated with protein drug development. Three planar ECL methods were developed, validated, and implemented to quantify three different TAs to support PK/TK studies. An automated liquid handler was used for the preparation of standards, quality controls, and validation samples to minimize assay variability. Robustness and ruggedness were tested during pre-study validations.     

NonClinical Dose Formulation Analysis Method Validation and Sample Analysis

Nonclinical dose formulation analysis methods are used to confirm test article concentration and homogeneity in formulations and determine formulation stability in support of regulated nonclinical studies. There is currently no regulatory guidance for nonclinical dose formulation analysis method validation or sample analysis. Regulatory guidance for the validation of analytical procedures has been developed for drug product/formulation testing; however, verification of the formulation concentrations falls under the framework of GLP regulations (not GMP). The only current related regulatory guidance is the bioanalytical guidance for method validation. The fundamental parameters for bioanalysis and formulation analysis validations that overlap include: recovery, accuracy, precision, specificity, selectivity, carryover, sensitivity, and stability. Divergence in bioanalytical and drug product validations typically center around the acceptance criteria used. As the dose formulation samples are not true “unknowns”, the concept of quality control samples that cover the entire range of the standard curve serving as the indication for the confidence in the data generated from the “unknown” study samples may not always be necessary. Also, the standard bioanalytical acceptance criteria may not be directly applicable, especially when the determined concentration does not match the target concentration. This paper attempts to reconcile the different practices being performed in the community and to provide recommendations of best practices and proposed acceptance criteria for nonclinical dose formulation method validation and sample analysis.     

Incurred sample accuracy assessment: design of experiments based on standard addition

It is commonly acknowledged that random and systematic analytical errors contribute to poor data quality, and moreover, to imprecise and inaccurate pharmacokinetic parameters. To investigate the random errors in GLP bioanalysis, common ground has been found in today's bioanalysis to assess the reproducibility of the method by reanalyzing part of the incurred samples. The undesired systematic errors in bioanalysis affecting the trueness of the method and leading to inaccurate data remain relatively unattended so far. In order to obtain both precise and accurate data it is suggested in this paper to apply standard addition experiments to calculate the relative systematic errors as an estimate for the incurred sample accuracy. This approach, which can be seen as an important extension to current guidelines in GLP bioanalysis, is illustrated by assessing the accuracy of the bioanalytical results for a bioequivalence study for alendronate.     

Recent advances in use of LC/MS/MS for quantitative high-throughput bioanalytical support of drug discovery

LC/MS/MS based bioanalysis using atmospheric pressure ionization (API)-style interfaces has now been applied for over a decade. This technology, which initially found application for clinical bioanalysis, is now firmly established as the primary bioanalytical tool for ADME studies related to drug discovery and lead optimization (LO). This review focuses on recent advances in LC/MS/MS based bioanalysis in support of drug discovery and LO. The initial part of the article reviews the principal components of LC/MS/MS bioanalysis: sample preparation, chromatography, ionization and mass analysis. In each section, factors affecting high throughput bioanalysis are addressed. Because of the importance of on-line column switching methods to discovery bioanalysis, the section on sample preparation is divided into off-line and on-line approaches. In addition, the discussion of chromatography is limited to reversed phase liquid chromatography with emphasis given to the trend towards high-flow gradient elution techniques. The latter part of the review focuses on considerations for experimental design. In this section, pooling methods such as cassette dosing are discussed along with more highly integrated strategies linking bioanalysis with protocol generation and sample collection. The article concludes by briefly reviewing factors, which affect bioanalytical precision and accuracy, such as ion suppression, analyte stability and metabolite interference.     

LC-MS/MS bioanalytical challenge: ultra-high sensitivity assays

Anne-Fran?oise Aubry is Director of Bioanalytical Sciences at Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., leading a team in developing bioanalytical methods for early development drug candidates in support of toxicology and clinical studies. Her main research interests are high-speed, high-resolution LC and new approaches for LC-MS/MS drug bioanalysis in regulated laboratories. Anne Aubry is on the executive board of the Eastern Analytical Symposium and on the organizing committee of the Applied Pharmaceutical Analysis and Chemical and Pharmaceutical Structure Analysis (Shanghai 2011) conferences. The challenges of developing and running low pg/ml LC-MS/MS bioanalytical assays in a regulated laboratory are reviewed. The practical problems encountered in implementing ultrasensitive assays are less in reaching a suitable sensitivity on the instrument than in implementing procedures to control losses and contamination, eliminate matrix interferences and ensure assay robustness so that the assay can be validated to industry standards. Solutions to these problems can be found in each of the three facets of the bioanalytical assay: the sample preparation, the chromatographic separation and the mass spectrometric detection. The key to developing an ultrasensitive assay is to optimize each of these elements. Progress in MS instrumentation has been essential in our ability to reach the low pg/ml limits.     

Insights in regulated bioanalysis of human insulin and insulin analogs by immunoanalytical methods

Despite the long and illustrious history of insulin and insulin analogs as important biotherapeutics, the regulated bioanalysis (in this article, regulated bioanalysis refers to the formalized process for generating bioanalytical data to support pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic assessments intended for development of insulin and insulin analogs as biotherapeutics, as opposed to the analytical process used for measuring insulin as a biomarker) of these peptides remains a challenging endeavor for a number of reasons. Paramount is the fact that the therapeutic concentrations are often low in serum/plasma and not too dissimilar from the endogenous level, particularly in patients with insulin resistance, such as Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Accordingly, this perspective was written to provide helpful background information for the design and conduct of immunoassays to support regulated bioanalysis of insulin and insulin analogs. Specifically, it highlights the technical challenges for determination of insulin and insulin analogs by immunoanalytical methods that are intended to support evaluations of pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics. In a broader sense, this perspective describes the general bioanalytical issues that are common to regulated bioanalysis of peptides and articulates some of the bioanalytical differences between conventional monoclonal antibodies and peptide therapeutics.     

Automation Practices in Large Molecule Bioanalysis: Recommendations from Group L5 of the Global Bioanalytical Consortium

In recent years, the use of automated sample handling instrumentation has come to the forefront of bioanalytical analysis in order to ensure greater assay consistency and throughput. Since robotic systems are becoming part of everyday analytical procedures, the need for consistent guidance across the pharmaceutical industry has become increasingly important. Pre-existing regulations do not go into sufficient detail in regard to how to handle the use of robotic systems for use with analytical methods, especially large molecule bioanalysis. As a result, Global Bioanalytical Consortium (GBC) Group L5 has put forth specific recommendations for the validation, qualification, and use of robotic systems as part of large molecule bioanalytical analyses in the present white paper. The guidelines presented can be followed to ensure that there is a consistent, transparent methodology that will ensure that robotic systems can be effectively used and documented in a regulated bioanalytical laboratory setting. This will allow for consistent use of robotic sample handling instrumentation as part of large molecule bioanalysis across the globe.     

Recommendations for the Bioanalytical Method Validation of Ligand-Binding Assays to Support Pharmacokinetic Assessments of Macromolecules

PURPOSE: With this publication a subcommittee of the AAPS Ligand Binding Assay Bioanalytical Focus Group (LBABFG) makes recommendations for the development, validation, and implementation of ligand binding assays (LBAs) that are intended to support pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic assessments of macromolecules. METHODS: This subcommittee was comprised of 10 members representing Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology, and the contract research organization industries from the United States, Canada, and Europe. Each section of this consensus document addresses a specific analytical performance characteristic or aspect for validation of a LBA. Within each section the topics are organized by an assay's life cycle, the development phase, pre-study validation, and in-study validation. Because unique issues often accompany bioanalytical assays for macromolecules, this document should be viewed as a guide for designing and conducting the validation of ligand binding assays. RESULTS: Values of +/- 20% (25% at the lower limit of quantification [LLOQ]) are recommended as default acceptance criteria for accuracy (% relative error [RE], mean bias) and interbatch precision (%coefficient of variation [CV]). In addition, we propose as secondary criteria for method acceptance that the sum of the interbatch precision (%CV) and the absolute value of the mean bias (%RE) be less than or equal to 30%. This added criterion is recommended to help ensure that in-study runs of test samples will meet the proposed run acceptance criteria of 4-6-30. Exceptions to the proposed process and acceptance criteria are appropriate when accompanied by a sound scientific rationale. CONCLUSIONS: In this consensus document, we attempt to make recommendations that are based on bioanalytical best practices and statistical thinking for development and validation of LBAs.     

Regulated drug bioanalysis for human pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug management

Regulated drug bioanalysis (i.e., determination of drug concentrations in biological matrices for regulated studies) usually refers to animal toxicokinetics, bioavailability/bioequivalence and clinical pharmacokinetic studies. However, there is another important regulated drug bioanalysis - therapeutic drug management (TDM). In the USA, TDM is regulated by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. In this article, we review and compare human pharmacokinetic sample analysis and TDM sample analysis. The US FDA/Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance and the American Association for Clinical Chemistry/TDM Roundtable Recommended Generic Assay Validation Guidance are also compared. Some regulated drug bioanalysis issues, such as terminology, validation concepts and acceptance criteria, are discussed. Fostering interaction between bioanalysts from pharmaceutical science and clinical chemistry and reducing the regulatory gaps between different agencies for drug bioanalysis is our objective.     

Assessment of Incurred Sample Reanalysis for Macromolecules to Evaluate Bioanalytical Method Robustness: Effects from Imprecision

Incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) is recommended by regulatory agencies to demonstrate reproducibility of validated methods and provide confidence that methods used in pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic assessments give reproducible results. For macromolecules to pass ISR, regulatory recommendations require that two thirds of ISR samples be within 30% of the average of original and reanalyzed values. A modified Bland-Altman (mBA) analysis was used to evaluate whether total error (TE), the sum of precision and accuracy, was predictive of a method's passing ISR and to identify potential contributing parameters for ISR success. Simulated studies determined minimum precision requirements for methods to have successful ISR and evaluated the relationship between precision and the probability of a method's passing ISR acceptance criteria. The present analysis evaluated ISRs conducted for 37 studies involving ligand-binding assays (LBAs), with TEs ranging from 15% to 30%. An mBA approach was used to assess accuracy and precision of ISR, each with a threshold of 30%. All ISR studies met current regulatory criteria; using mBA, all studies met the accuracy threshold of 30% or less, but two studies (5%) failed to meet the 30% precision threshold. Simulation results showed that when an LBA has ≤15% imprecision, the ISR criteria for both the regulatory recommendation and mBA would be met in 99.9% of studies. Approximately 71% of samples are expected to be within 1.5 times the method imprecision. Therefore, precision appears to be a critical parameter in LBA reproducibility and may also be useful in identifying methods that have difficulty passing ISR.     

Generic Anti-PEG Antibody Assay on ProterixBio’s (Formerly BioScale) ViBE Platform Shows Poor Reproducibility

PEGylation is a modification commonly used to increase the half-life of therapeutic proteins. The strategy for immunogenicity testing of these compounds should include methods to detect both anti-protein and anti-PEG antibodies. We previously reported a method for the detection of anti-PEG antibodies using ProterixBio’s (formerly BioScale) acoustic membrane microparticle (AMMP) technology. Our initial method development work showed the assay was capable of detecting antibodies in human serum with a sensitivity of 1 μg/mL with good reproducibility (CV?<?7%). Since the publication of this initial paper, additional experimentation was performed in an effort to validate the assay for support of clinical sample analysis. This additional data indicate that the method has high variability (CV%?>?20) and is unsuitable to support clinical sample analysis.