Effects of low dose fluticasone/salmeterol combination on surrogate inflammatory markers in moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive surrogate markers provide valuable information on the asthmatic inflammatory process. We wished to examine the effects of low dose fluticasone/salmeterol combination on different commonly used inflammatory markers in moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: Twenty-five moderate persistent atopic asthmatics were enrolled of whom 20 completed an open label study. Following an initial 4 week steroid washout period in which patients took salmeterol 50 microg dry powder inhaler 1 puff BD, they received the addition of fluticasone as fluticasone 100 microg/salmeterol 50 microg combination dry powder inhaler 1 puff BD for the next 2 weeks. Exhaled nitric oxide, spirometry, methacholine PD20, sputum/blood eosinophils and sputum/serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were measured following the salmeterol only and fluticasone/salmeterol combination treatment periods. RESULTS: Compared to salmeterol alone (i.e. after the steroid washout), the use of fluticasone/salmeterol combination conferred significant improvements (P < 0.05) in all surrogate markers of inflammation apart from serum ECP. Geometric mean fold changes were 4.3-fold/1.3-fold for sputum/blood eosinophils, 2.2-fold/1.2-fold for sputum/serum ECP, 2.3-fold for methacholine PD20 and 1.8-fold for exhaled nitric oxide. CONCLUSIONS: Surrogate markers apart from serum ECP may be used as a guide to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of low dose inhaled corticosteroids. Sputum markers tend to be more sensitive than blood when assessing the anti-inflammatory response.     

Eosinophilic bronchitis in asthma: a model for establishing dose-response and relative potency of inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND: Newer generations and formulations of inhaled corticosteroids have necessitated the development of a clinically relevant model to compare their clinical potency. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether sputum eosinophil counts could demonstrate a dose-response to inhaled corticosteroids, and compared the response with other inflammatory markers. METHODS: Fourteen steroid-naive patients with asthma with an initial sputum eosinophilia of > or = 2.5% entered a 6-week sequential, placebo-controlled, patient-blinded, cumulative dose-response study. After 7 days of placebo, they received incremental doses of fluticasone propionate (FP), 50, 100, 200, and 400 microg/d, each for 7 days. Measurements were made of sputum and blood eosinophils, exhaled nitric oxide, spirometry, airway responsiveness to methacholine (methacholine PC20), and symptom scores before and after each dose. RESULTS: Sputum eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide were extremely sensitive to the effects of FP, and exhibited significant dose-dependent reductions of 99.4% and 99.8 parts per billion, respectively, where each variable was expressed per 100 microg/d FP. This compared with a 0.5 doubling dose increase of airway responsiveness to methacholine and a 0.3 decrease in symptom scores. Airway responsiveness to methacholine was the only variable that increased throughout the study. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the model of eosinophilic bronchitis could be used to compare the effect of cumulative doses of an inhaled corticosteroid delivered by different types of delivery systems or preparations using a relatively small number of patients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Future clinical studies based on this model will allow clinicians to make informed decisions regarding the relative potencies of different inhaled corticosteroids.     

Characterization of within-subject responses to fluticasone and montelukast in childhood asthma

BACKGROUND: Responses to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) vary among asthmatic patients. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether responses to ICSs and LTRAs are concordant for individuals or whether asthmatic patients who do not respond to one medication respond to the other. METHODS: Children 6 to 17 years of age with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma were randomized to one of 2 crossover sequences, including 8 weeks of an ICS, fluticasone propionate (100 microg twice daily), and 8 weeks of an LTRA, montelukast (5-10 mg nightly depending on age), in a multicenter, double-masked, 18-week trial. Response was assessed on the basis of improvement in FEV 1 and assessed for relationships to baseline asthma phenotype-associated biomarkers. RESULTS: Defining response as improvement in FEV 1 of 7.5% or greater, 17% of 126 participants responded to both medications, 23% responded to fluticasone alone, 5% responded to montelukast alone, and 55% responded to neither medication. Compared with those who responded to neither medication, favorable response to fluticasone alone was associated with higher levels of exhaled nitric oxide, total eosinophil counts, levels of serum IgE, and levels of serum eosinophil cationic protein and lower levels of methacholine PC(20) and pulmonary function; favorable response to montelukast alone was associated with younger age and shorter disease duration. Greater differential response to fluticasone over montelukast was associated with higher bronchodilator use, bronchodilator response, exhaled nitric oxide levels, and eosinophil cationic protein levels and lower methacholine PC(20) and pulmonary function values. CONCLUSIONS: Response to fluticasone and montelukast vary considerably. Children with low pulmonary function or high levels of markers associated with allergic inflammation should receive ICS therapy. Other children could receive either ICSs or LTRAs.     

The relationship between airway hyper‐responsiveness, markers of inflammation and lung function depends on the duration of the asthmatic disease

BACKGROUND: The combination of airway hyper-responsiveness, eosinophilic airway inflammation, and lung function impairment is considered as a hallmark of bronchial asthma. Since airway function might change with time in chronic asthma, the association between parameters which are characteristic of asthma could be different in subjects with different durations of the disease. OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether in patients with asthma the relationship between airway hyperresponsiveness, non-invasive markers of airway inflammation, and baseline lung function depended on the duration of the disease. METHODS: Sixty-six non-smoking patients with mild to moderate allergic asthma without corticosteroids were assigned to two groups, according to a duration of the disease (time interval since doctor's diagnosis) of either < or = 16 years (median 8 years; mean FEV1, 92.6% pred.; n = 34) or > 16 year (median 25 years; mean FEV1, 87.9% pred.; n = 32). RESULTS: Groups did not differ statistically in PC20FEV1 of methacholine, sputum composition, levels of exhaled nitric oxide (NO), lung function parameters, or history of treatment. There were significant correlations between PC20FEV1, eosinophils and NO in patients with a duration of the disease < or = 16 year, but no relation to lung function. In contrast, patients with a duration > 16 year showed a correlation between PC20FEV1 of methacholine and lung function but not eosinophils or NO. In both groups, eosinophils and NO were associated with each other. These results were corroborated by the statistical procedure of factor analysis that revealed 'inflammation' and 'lung function' as major entities and found 'responsiveness' to be associated with only one of them in each group. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that with a shorter duration of the asthmatic disease airway hyper-responsiveness is associated with airway inflammation, whereas with a longer duration it is associated with impaired lung function, suggesting that in chronic asthma ongoing alterations become the primary determinant of functional characteristics.     

Adding salmeterol to an inhaled corticosteroid reduces allergen-induced serum IL-5 and peripheral blood eosinophils

BACKGROUND: Adding a long-acting beta(2)-agonist to inhaled corticosteroids results in better symptomatic asthma control than increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids. OBJECTIVE: Investigating whether adding the long-acting beta(2)-agonist salmeterol to the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate has an effect on allergen-induced allergic inflammation in asthma. METHODS: Bronchial allergen challenges were performed in 26 patients with allergic asthma, pretreating them with a single dose of either fluticasone/salmeterol (100/50 microg) or fluticasone alone (100 microg), in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over design. Sputum and serum markers of bronchial inflammation were measured after allergen challenge, as well as lung function parameters. Primary outcomes were sputum eosinophil numbers and eosinophil cationic protein. RESULTS: Asthmatic responses after allergen challenge were significantly reduced after pretreatment with fluticasone/salmeterol relative to fluticasone alone. Sputum inflammatory markers after allergen challenge were not significantly affected by fluticasone/salmeterol pretreatment. By contrast, serum IL-5 was significantly reduced (geometric mean serum IL-5 [SEM]: 0.5 [0.3] vs 1.1 [0.3] pg/mL 1 hour and 0.6 [0.3] vs 1.1 [0.3] pg/mL 6 hours after challenge with fluticasone/salmeterol vs fluticasone alone pretreatment, respectively; P values < .05). Also, peripheral blood eosinophils were significantly reduced (geometric mean number x 10(6)/L [SEM]: 172 [0.1] vs 237 [0.1] at 6 hours and 271 [0.1] vs 351 [0.1] at 24 hours with fluticasone/salmeterol vs fluticasone alone pretreatment, respectively; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Adding salmeterol to fluticasone reduces allergen-induced serum IL-5 and peripheral blood eosinophils. This phenomenon may contribute to the improved clinical outcomes that result from adding a long-acting beta(2)-agonist to inhaled corticosteroids.     

Effect of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol therapy on seasonal changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide levels in patients with pollen-induced asthma.

BACKGROUND: There has been concern that in allergic asthmatic patients there might be an interactive effect on inflammation between regular salmeterol use and exposure to allergens, resulting in increased airway responsiveness. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of salmeterol on allergen-induced changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) levels in allergic asthmatic patients concomitantly taking inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: Forty-two asthmatic patients sensitized to pollen allergens were randomly allocated to treatment with fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (n=21) or fluticasone propionate alone (n=21). Spirometry, the methacholine provocation concentration causing a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC20), the adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) PC20, and ENO levels were measured before and at the height of the pollen season after 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Changes in the methacholine PC20, the AMP PC20, and ENO levels were not significantly different between treatment groups. No significant changes in the AMP PC20 were observed among the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and fluticasone propionate groups during natural pollen exposure. However, a significant increase in the methacholine PC20 was observed in the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol group (P = .03) and in the fluticasone propionate group (P = .04); ENO concentrations decreased significantly in both groups during natural allergen exposure (P = .009 and .005). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pollen-induced asthma, treatment with either fluticasone propionate or fluticasone propionate-salmeterol is associated with significant reductions in methacholine responsiveness and ENO concentrations, even during natural pollen exposure. Furthermore, at least in patients with mild asthma, natural allergen exposure and the regular use of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol are not associated with a greater increase in ENO levels and airway responsiveness than natural allergen exposure and fluticasone propionate use alone.     

Assessment of inhaled BDP-dose dependency of exhaled nitric oxide and local and serum eosinophilic markers in steroids-naive nonatopic asthmatics

The aim of the present study was to assess the dose-dependency from inhaled steroids of changes of airways inflammation [eosinophils count and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP)] measures in induced sputum and in serum, as well as that of exhaled nitric oxide. Twenty steroid-naive patients with nonatopic asthma of mild to moderate degree [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) = 70% of predicted] and with negative response to the standard tests for allergy were selected; after a 1-week run-in period they were randomized to receive a 12-week treatment period of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate dry powder given with the Pulvinal inhaler (Clenil P, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy) in two different dose regimens, 400 microg bid (high dose) or 200 microg bid (low dose), over a double blind, parallel groups design. The following outcome measures were assessed in baseline and after 1, 6 and 12 weeks of treatment: FEV1 (l), eosinophils count in sputum (%), is ECP (microg/l), serum eosinophils count (%), serum ECP (microg/l) and exhaled NO (ppb). The results showed that all the considered parameters improved in both groups: the increase over baseline of FEV1 and the decrease of NO were significant at any time in the high-dose group and only at week 12 in the low-dose group (NS between groups), whereas the markers of eosinophilic activity showed more consistent reductions in the high-dose than in the low-dose group when measured in induced sputum (P < 0.05 between groups after 6 and 12 weeks for eosinophils count and after 12 weeks for ECP). Decreases over baseline of markers measured in serum were more rapid in the high-dose group, without differences between groups. A marked trend towards a negative correlation was found between FEV1 and ECP, (r = -0.72, P < 0.05), between FEV1 and eosinophils in sputum (r = -0.31, NS) and between FEV1 and exhaled NO (r = -0.38, NS), all of them only in the high-dose group. The results of the study demonstrate that changes of levels of eosinophilic activity in the airways are dependent from the daily dose of inhaled steroids when measured in induced sputum and that the local assessment can therefore represent a practical and noninvasive method to monitor the extent of airways inflammation.     

支气管哮喘患者FeNO的表达及临床意义

目的:探讨不同呼出气一氧化氮(Fractional exhaled nitric oxide,FeNO)水平下支气管哮喘患者痰液、血液、肺功能检测等多个观察指标的表达特点,并分析在气道高反应性中的预测价值。方法:选取2017年1月至2019年5月于我院就诊的120例疑似支气管哮喘患者作为研究对象进行前瞻性分析,根据FeNO水平不同,将FeNO>49 ppb的42例患者列为高水平组,FeNO为26~49 ppb的33例患者为低水平组,FeNO≤25 ppb的45例患者为正常组。比较三组患者的基本临床资料、痰嗜酸性粒细胞、痰中性粒细胞、血嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白(Eosinophilic cationic protein,ECP)和免疫球蛋白E(Immunoglobulin E,IgE)以及第1s用力呼气容积(Forced expiratory volume at 1s,FEV1)、FEV1占预测值百分比(FEV1%Pred)、用力肺活量(Forced vital capacity,FVC)以及FEV1与FVC比值(FEV1/FVC)等肺功能检测结果进行统计分析。结果:经Spearman相关性分析显示,血IgE、ECP水平与FeNO水平呈正相关(r=0.615/0.629,P>0.01),FEV1%pred、FEV1/FVC与FeNO水平呈负相关(r=-0.494/0.789,P>0.01)。其中血IgE、ECP、FEV1%pred、FEV1/FVC对于预测支气管哮喘有一定的价值,而联合上述指标对于预测支气管哮喘的准确性最佳(AUC=0.920,P>0.01)。结论:不同FeNO水平支气管哮喘患者在临床表现中具有显著差异,在血IgE、ECP和肺功能FEV1%pred、FEV1/FVC指标检测的基础上增加FeNO可大大增加预测支气管哮喘的准确性。     

Intranasal and inhaled fluticasone propionate for pollen-induced rhinitis and asthma

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that nasal treatment might influence lower airway symptoms and function in patients with comorbid rhinitis and asthma. We investigated the effect of intranasal, inhaled corticosteroid or the combination of both in patients with both pollen-induced rhinitis and asthma. METHODS: A total of 262 patients were randomized to 6 weeks' treatment with intranasal fluticasone propionate (INFP) 200 microg o.d., inhaled fluticasone propionate (IHFP) 250 microg b.i.d., their combination, or intranasal or inhaled placebo, in a multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group study. Treatment was started 2 weeks prior to the pollen season and patients recorded their nasal and bronchial symptoms twice daily. Before and after 4 and 6 weeks' treatment, the patients were assessed for lung function, methacholine responsiveness, and induced sputum cell counts. RESULTS: Intranasal fluticasone propionate significantly increased the percentages of patients reporting no nasal blockage, sneezing, or rhinorrhoea during the pollen season, compared with IHFP or intranasal or inhaled placebo. In contrast, only IHFP significantly improved morning peak-flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and methacholine PD20, and the seasonal increase in the sputum eosinophils and methacholine responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pollen-induced rhinitis and asthma, the combination of intranasal and IHFP is needed to control the seasonal increase in nasal and asthmatic symptoms.     

A multicenter, open-label, randomized comparison of suppressive effects on asthmatic inflammation of lower airways and improved effects on health-related QOL between HFA-BDP and fluticasone propionate]

PURPOSE: It is important to evaluate the effects of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP), which shows predominant deposition in the lower airways, on asthmatic inflammation in the lower airways and the Quality of Life (QOL) of asthma patients, as compared with those of fluticasone propionate (FP) Diskus. METHODS: Seventy-seven adult patients with mild persistent or more severe asthma who were being treated with FP for >/=3 months were randomly assigned to the HFA-BDP group and continued FP group. The differential count of eosinophils in the peripheral blood, the serum cortisol levels, and pulmonary function parameters were measured before the study and at 3 months after the start of the study treatment. The improvements in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores were also compared. Sputum samples collected by the induced expectoration method (inhalation of 10% saline for 15 min) were divided into the early-phase sputum samples obtained within 15 minutes of the inhalation and the late-phase sputum samples obtained later than 15 minutes after the inhalation, and the eosinophil count and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels were measured. RESULTS: In the HFA-BDP group (N=40), the differential count of eosinophils in the peripheral blood was significantly decreased as compared with that in the FP group (p=0.009), and the scores in all the domains of the AQLQ and the percentage improvement of the total score were significantly better as compared with those in FP group (p=0.033). The eosinophil count in the late-phase sputum samples (p=0.022) as well as the ECP level in the sputum samples showed more pronounced decreases in the HFA-BDP group as compared with those in the FP group. On the other hand, no significant changes were detected in the pulmonary function values. CONCLUSION: Use of the HFA-BDP preparation can more effectively suppress residual inflammation in the lower airways and significantly improve the QOL as compared with use of the FP preparation of asthma patients. Examination of induced sputum samples allows detection of changes in the peripheral airways that cannot be detected by pulmonary function testing.     

Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone: a study comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma.

BACKGROUND: The current stepwise approach to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of asthma includes the initiation of an inhaled corticosteroid with the addition of a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator if low dose inhaled corticosteroid fails to control asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether initiation of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate treatment together improves asthma control greater than initiation of monotherapy with the individual agents alone with no additional safety risk in patients with asthma who had not previously been treated with inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: A total of 136 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) between 50% and 80% of predicted] were randomized to twice daily salmeterol 42 microg, fluticasone propionate 88 microg, fluticasone propionate 220 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 88 microg, salmeterol 42 microg plus fluticasone propionate 220 microg, or placebo for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Patients treated with salmeterol combined with fluticasone propionate had improvements over baseline in FEV at endpoint that were at least twice as great (0.6 to 0.7 L) as improvements in patients treated with salmeterol (0.3 L) or fluticasone propionate alone (0.3 L) (P < .05). Patient-rated data (peak expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, percent of days with no asthma symptoms) confirmed greater (P < .05) mean change from baseline improvements after combined treatment compared with fluticasone propionate alone. No clinically significant differences were noted between treatment groups in any safety measurement. CONCLUSION: Initiation of maintenance therapy with salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma treated with short-acting beta2-agonists alone provides greater improvements in pulmonary function and symptom control than initiation of maintenance therapy with fluticasone propionate alone.     

Sensitivity of sputum eosinophil cationic protein level for monitoring asthmatic patients with normal peak expiratory flow]

Previous studies have shown that eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels in the sputum of patients with asthma closely reflect inflammatory activity of the bronchial mucosa. We examined whether the ECP level or eosinophil count in induced sputum provides information useful in determining whether to taper the dose of medications or to terminate treatment especially with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with well controlled asthma. We studied 15 adults with asthma who consistently maintained a peak expiratory flow (PEF) value within 80% or more of their predicted value (green zone) for at least 4 weeks with no asthmatic symptoms. All patients underwent at least two hypretonic saline inhalation tests. Forty sputum samples were obtained for evaluation of cell count and ECP level. Before the tests, patients were requested to record asthmatic symptoms, medications received, and morning and evening PEF values in a diary for more than 3 months. The relations among clinical and laboratory variables, including symptoms scores, medication scores, asthma scores (= symptom scores + medication scores). PEF values, forced expiratory volume (FEV1.0) during the test, and sputum eosinophil count or sputum ECP, were analyzed. The sputum ECP level correlated significantly with the percentage of eosinophils in the sputum (rs = 0.783). There were also significant correlations between the sputum ECP level and the mean weekly symptom scores (rs = 0.500-0.510), medication scores (rs = 0.510-0.540), and asthma scores (rs = 0.509-0.548). However, there were no significant correlations among sputum ECP level, mean morning PEF or evening PEF, daily variation in PEF, and FEV1.0. We conclude that the sputum ECP level is a sensitive laboratory variable useful in monitoring the presence of eosinophilic inflammation in the bronchial mucosa of patients with bronchial asthma, especially those who have mild or no symptoms with normal PEF.     

Eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein in induced sputum and blood: effects of budesonide and terbutaline treatment.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for easily measurable markers of airway inflammation to guide the use of anti-inflammatory treatment in asthma. Eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) levels in sputum and blood correlate with clinical severity, and serial measurements of ECP have been proposed as a suitable candidate. AIMS AND METHODS: Our aim was to confirm that sputum and serum ECP measurements would provide a more sensitive indicator of responses to asthma treatment than eosinophil counts per se, in a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study of terbutaline, budesonide, and their combination in patients with chronic persistent asthma. We compared the changes in eosinophil counts and ECP in induced sputum and blood during each treatment period. RESULTS: Budesonide and combined treatment caused a significant reduction in sputum eosinophils (-2.7% and -2.3%, respectively, P < 0.05). Sputum eosinophils increased with terbutaline (+3.9%, P = 0.049). In contrast, the changes for sputum ECP were not significant. There was a similar treatment effect on blood eosinophils, but not for serum ECP. Correlations between sputum and blood eosinophils were significant with and without budesonide, but were nonsignificant between sputum and blood ECP during the active treatments. Correlations between sputum eosinophils and ECP, and between blood eosinophils and serum ECP were greatest during treatment with placebo or terbutaline alone: budesonide weakened or abolished these relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with eosinophil counts, ECP measurements in either induced sputum or serum failed to reflect treatment-related changes in chronic asthma. We conclude that ECP is not a sensitive or reliable means of evaluating airway inflammation, and can not be recommended for assessing responses to anti-inflammatory therapy.     

Nitric oxide metabolites,eosinophils, and eosinophilic cationic protein in patients with asthma: sputum versus blood

The monitoring of airway inflammation has assessed in bronchial asthma directly by sputum examination, and indirectly by measurements in peripheral blood. To investigate the diagnostic value of these two methods, we compared nitric oxide (NO) metabolites, eosinophils, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in sputum and blood in patients with asthma and control subjects. Sputum and serum were obtained from fifteen patients with asthma, and then were examined before anti-asthma treatment, including steroid preparations. ECP was measured by fluoroimmunoassay. NO metabolites were assayed by using modified Griess reaction. Asthmatic patients, compared with control subjects, had significantly higher level of NO metabolites, higher proportion of eosinophils, and higher levels of ECP in sputum. Asthmatic patients, compared with control subjects, however, had significantly higher number of eosinophils, and were at higher levels of ECP in blood. FEV1, FEV1/FVC was negatively correlated with sputum eosinophils. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that eosinophils in sputum are significantly accurate markers than NO metabolites in sputum and blood. These findings suggest that the proportion of eosinophils in sputum have more accurate diagnostic marker of asthmatic airway inflammation than NO metabolites in sputum in differentiating asthmatic patients from control subjects.     

Relationship between induced sputum cell counts and fluid-phase eosinophil cationic protein and clinical or physiologic profiles in mild asthma.

BACKGROUND: Sputum analysis is the only non-invasive method to examine airway inflammatory processes in subjects with asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between cell counts and fluid phase levels in induced sputum in subjects with mild asthma, and the severity of asthma as assessed by clinical, physiologic and blood measurements. METHODS: Forty patients with mild asthma, aged 17 to 49 years were studied (good sputum sample only from 31). On the first day, spirometry and methacholine challenges were performed. After 2 to 4 days, venous blood for absolute eosinophil count and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) measurement was obtained and sputum was induced by inhalation of hypertonic saline. For the next 15 days subjects recorded their peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom scores, and beta2-agonist requirements twice daily. Differential counts of leukocytes were done on cytospin preparations of homogenized sputum and the supernatant was examined for eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). RESULTS: Sputum eosinophil counts and not neutrophil, epithelial cells, macrophages, or lymphocytes, were inversely correlated to FEV1/FVC % (r = -.57, P = .0008) and to PC20-methacholine (r = -.40, P = .024). No statistical relationship was obtained between eosinophil counts and either symptom scores, bronchodilator requirements, or daily PEF variability. Sputum ECP values were correlated to FEV1/FVC% (r = -.41, P = .026) but not to PC20 (r = -.32, P = .08) or clinical scores or PEF variation. A trend to significance was appreciated between peripheral blood and sputum eosinophil counts (r = .34, P = .067) and no relationship was found between sputum and serum ECP values (r = .10, P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: Although sputum markers give some information about disordered lung function and physiologic changes in the airways, they are not the only factors concerned in the clinical expression of mild asthma.     

Liposome-entrapped D. pteronyssinus vaccination in mild asthma patients: effect of 1-year double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on inflammation, bronchial hyper-responsiveness and immediate and late bronchial responses to the allergen

BACKGROUND: Allergen vaccination is effective in mite-allergic asthma. Liposomes are immunological adjuvants that can act as allergen carriers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the immunological and functional effects of a liposome-entrapped D. pteronyssinus vaccine on mite monosensitive, mild asthma patients. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on 26 asthma patients who randomly received vaccination or placebo for 1 year. The levels of exposure to Der p 1 allergen were constant during the study. Allergen bronchial challenge was made at the beginning (T0) and after 1 year of treatment (T12). The day before and 24 h after the allergen provocation, patients were challenged with methacholine (Mth) (until FEV1 fell by 40%) and blood and sputum samples were obtained. Dose-response curves to Mth were evaluated in terms of Mth-PD20 (dose of Mth that induced 20% drop in FEV1), slope (Mth-DRS) and level of plateau. Blood and sputum eosinophils and serum levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) were measured. RESULTS: Groups were comparable at the start of the trial. At TI2, previous to the allergen challenge, the active group showed higher values of both FEV1 and Mth-PD20 and lower values of Mth-DRS. The number of patients presenting a level of plateau increased in the active group (from two to four) and decreased in the placebo group (from two to one). At T12, before the allergen challenge, serum ECP levels increased in the placebo group and blood eosinophils showed a trend towards lower numbers in the active one. The immediate response and the changes in Mth-DRS values, sputum eosinophils and serum ECP levels following the allergen challenge were attenuated in the active group. CONCLUSION: Liposome-entrapped D. Pteronyssinus vaccination: (i) protects mild asthma patients from the worsening of asthma due to sustained mite exposure; and (ii) reduces the functional and inflammatory changes induced by allergen bronchial provocation.     

Significant variability in response to inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: A clinical model is needed to compare inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) with respect to efficacy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the relative beneficial and systemic effects in a dose-response relationship for 2 ICSs. METHODS: A 24-week, parallel, open-label, multicenter trial examined the benefit-risk ratio of 2 ICSs in persistent asthma. Benefit was assessed by improvements in FEV(1) and PC(20); risk was assessed by overnight plasma cortisol suppression. Thirty subjects were randomized to either beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 168, 672, and 1344 microg/day (n = 15) or fluticasone propionate (FP) 88, 352, and 704 microg/day (n = 15), both administered by means of a metered dose inhaler (MDI) with chlorofluorocarbon propellant via a spacer, in 3 consecutive 6-week intervals; this was followed by 3 weeks of FP dry powder inhaler (DPI) 2000 microg/day. RESULTS: Maximum FEV(1) response occurred with the low dose for FP-MDI and the medium dose for BDP-MDI and was not further increased by treatment with FP-DPI. Near-maximum methacholine PC(20) improvement occurred with the low dose for FP-MDI and the medium dose for BDP-MDI. Both BDP-MDI and FP-MDI caused dose-dependent cortisol suppression. Responsiveness to ICS treatment was found to vary markedly among subjects. Good (>15%) FEV(1) response, in contrast to poor (<5%) response, was found to be associated with high exhaled nitric oxide (median, 17.6 vs 11.1 ppb), high bronchodilator reversibility (25.2% vs 8.8%), and a low FEV(1)/forced vital capacity ratio (0.63 vs 0.73) before treatment. Excellent (>3 doubling dilutions) improvement in PC(20), in contrast to poor (<1 doubling dilution) improvement, was found to be associated with high sputum eosinophil levels (3.4% vs 0.1%) and older age at onset of asthma (age, 20-29 years vs <10 years). CONCLUSIONS: Near-maximal FEV(1) and PC(20) effects occurred with low-medium dose for both ICSs in the subjects studied. High-dose ICS therapy did not significantly increase the efficacy measures that were evaluated, but it did increase the systemic effect measure, overnight cortisol secretion. Significant intersubject variability in response occurred with both ICSs. It is possible that higher doses of ICSs are necessary to manage more severe patients or to achieve goals of therapy not evaluated in this study, such as prevention of asthma exacerbations.     

Relationship between sputum inflammatory markers and osmotic airway hyperresponsiveness during induction of sputum in asthmatic patients

Hypertonic saline aerosols are being used increasingly for bronchial provocation testing and induction of sputum. The aims of this study were to assess the response to challenge with 3% hypertonic saline administered via a ultrasonic nebulizer in patients with asthma, and to evaluate relationship between % fall of FEV1 during induction of sputum (osmotic airway hyperresponsiveness; osmotic AHR) and biochemical markers of induced sputum. We investigated changes in FEV1 in response to inhaling ultrasonically nebulized 3% saline in 25 patients with asthma and 10 control subjects. FEV1 was measured before, during, and after induction of sputum. We used fluoroimmunoassay to detect eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), immunohistochemical staining to detect EG2+ (secretory form of ECP) eosinophils, and a sandwich ELISA to detect interleukin (IL)-5. Protein concentration was determined by using bicinchoninic acid protein assay reagent. Asthmatics, compared with controls, had significantly higher osmotic AHR. Moderate to severe asthmatics had significantly higher osmotic AHR compared to mild asthmatics. Osmotic AHR was significantly correlated with the proportion of eosinophils, the levels of ECP, EG2+ eosinophils, IL-5, and proteins. These data suggest that osmotic AHR is closely related to the clinical status and biochemical markers of sputum supernatant in asthmatic patients.     

Long-term comparison of 3 controller regimens for mild-moderate persistent childhood asthma: the Pediatric Asthma Controller Trial

BACKGROUND: More evidence is needed on which to base recommendations for treatment of mild-moderate persistent asthma in school-aged children. OBJECTIVE: The Pediatric Asthma Controller Trial (PACT) compared the effectiveness of 3 regimens in achieving asthma control. METHODS: A total of 285 children (ages 6-14 years) with mild-moderate persistent asthma on the basis of symptoms, and with FEV(1) >or= 80% predicted and methacholine FEV(1) PC(20) or= 80% predicted, confirming current guideline recommendations.     

Allergen-induced bronchial inflammation in house dust mite-allergic patients with or without asthma

BACKGROUND: It is presently unknown which factors determine the occurrence and persistence of asthma in house dust mite-allergic individuals. The level of allergen-specific IgE antibodies does not seem to be decisive for asthmatic symptoms. Moreover, levels of exposure to mite allergens do not seem to differ significantly between asthmatic and non-asthmatics individuals. AIM: It was hypothesized that the presence or absence of asthmatic symptoms in house dust mite-allergic patients is associated with quantitative or qualitative differences in the cellular bronchial inflammatory response during the late phase of the allergic reaction. This hypothesis was tested in the bronchial allergen challenge model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Whole lung challenges with house dust mite extract were performed in 52 house dust mite-allergic subjects, of whom 26 had asthma and 26 had perennial rhinitis without asthmatic symptoms. Primary outcomes were parameters for bronchial inflammation in serial samples of induced sputum (cell differentials, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), interleukin-8 (IL-8), myeloperoxydase (MPO)). In addition, lung function, non-specific bronchial hyper-responsiveness and serial blood samples (eosinophils and IL-5) were analysed. RESULTS: At baseline sputum eosinophils and ECP were similar in both groups but neutrophils and IL-8 were higher in asthmatics. The early bronchoconstriction after allergen challenge was similar in asthma and non-asthmatic rhinitis (median decrease in FEV1: asthma -31.7% vs. non-asthmatics -29.1%, P > 0.1). The late phase bronchoconstriction was significantly greater in asthma (median decrease in FEV1: asthma -27.6% vs. non-asthmatics -18.9%, P = 0.02). Induction of bronchial hyper-responsiveness was similar in both groups. Bronchial allergen challenge elicited significant increases in sputum eosinophils and ECP, which were indistinguishable for both groups (P > 0.1 and P = 0.07, respectively). In contrast, higher numbers of neutrophils persisted in asthma 24h after challenge and were accompanied by significant increases in IL-8 and MPO, which were absent in non-asthmatics (difference between groups P = 0.007 and P = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: Allergen challenge inducedvery similar increases in eosinophils and ECP in induced sputum in allergic asthmatics and in allergic non-asthmatic patients. The difference in bronchial inflammation between asthma and non-asthmatic rhinitis appeared to be more closely related to indices for neutrophilic inflammation.