EFFECTS OF KETOROLAC TROMETAMOL ON RENAL FUNCTION

We have compared the renal effects of ketorolac trometamol 10mg administered 4-hourly by intermittent i.m. injection or bycontinuous i.m. infusion with placebo in a double-blind studyin 67 patients who had undergone upper abdominal surgery. Ketorolacwas supplemented during the 48-h postoperative study periodwith bolus doses of morphine delivered by a patient controlledanalgesia system. The only significant effect of ketorolac onrenal function compared with patients who received placebo wasreduced excretion of potassium. The overall changes caused bysurgery alone were of much greater magnitude. Bleeding timewas increased with ketorolac, but there were no adverse eventsrelated to this.     

KETOROLAC TROMETAMOL FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY

We have compared the postoperative morphine requirements andanalgesic efficacy of four doses of i.m. ketorolac 30 mg administered6-hourly with placebo in a double-blind study of patients undergoingmajor or minor orthopaedic surgery. During the 24-h postoperativestudy period which began at the end of surgery, patients wereprescribed i.m. morphine 10 mg as required 2-hourly and assessmentswere made of pain at 4 and 24 h. After major surgery, the medianmorphine consumption over 24 h was 10 mg in patients who receivedketorolac, compared with 30 mg in those who received placebo(P = 0.008). Visual analogue pain scores and verbal pain assessmentswere better than placebo at 4 h (P = 0.028 and P = 0.008, respectively),but were not statistically different between the groups at 24h. Overall assessment of pain was similar in both groups whohad undergone major surgery. In the minor surgery groups, medianmorphine consumption was 0 mg in patients who received ketorolac,compared with 10 mg in those given placebo (ns). Visual analoguepain scores at 24 h after surgery were significantly less inpatients who had received ketorolac compared with placebo (P= 0.046) and the overall assessment of pain relief was betterin the ketorolac group (P = 0.0007). Mandatory administrationof ketorolac appeared to be of benefit in both major and minororthopaedic surgery, although the principal effects were reductionin requirement for supplementary morphine for major surgeryand better overall analgesia for minor surgery.     

Analgesic efficacy and safety of preoperative versus postoperative ketorolac in paediatric tonsillectomy

Background : Tonsillectomy is a common procedure in childhood resulting in significant morbidity due to pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of a single dose of ketorolac i.v. given before or after tonsillectomy, compared to placebo.
Methods : A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 60 children, 5 to 15 years of age, admitted for tonsillectomy Patients were allocated to receive ketorolac 1 mg . kg^-1 i.v. or placebo. Postoperative pain was assessed by self-report 1.5, 3, 5, and 24 h after surgery.
Results : Pain scores were significantly lower for both ketorolac groups compared to the placebo group 1.5, 3, and 5 h after surgery ( P <0.05). Pain scores were lowest in the preoperative ketorolac group 1.5 to 5 h after surgery, and significantly fewer children in this group had fentanyl 0 to 1.5 h after surgery. But no significant differences were found between pain scores of the preoperative and postoperative ketorolac groups in the first 24 h after surgery. Acetaminophen consumption during the first 5 h after surgery was significantly less in patients receiving ketorolac ( P <0.05). Patients in the preoperative ketorolac group had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative vomiting ( P <0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative bleeding between groups. Three children in the preoperative, 5 children in the postoperative ketorolac group, and 5 children in the placebo group experienced postoperative haemorrhage.
Conclusion : This study indicates that a single dose of ketorolac 1 mg . kg^-1 i.v. administered either before or immediately after surgery improves postoperative analgesia in children after tonsillectomy without evidence of increased incidence of bleeding.     

I.v. diclofenac and ketorolac for pain after thoracoscopic surgery

We studied intensity of pain, cumulative morphine consumption, ventilatory and renal function, and haemostasis in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and receiving a 2-day i.v. infusion of diclofenac, ketorolac or saline. Plasma concentrations of the two NSAID were also measured. The study was randomized, double- blind and placebo-controlled, with 10 patients in each group. Patients experienced mainly moderate pain. Mean consumption of i.v. morphine during the first day after operation was 57 (SEM 11) mg in the placebo group. Diclofenac and ketorolac were equally effective in reducing total morphine consumption (61% and 52%, respectively). Adverse events were similar and minor. Greater variability in plasma concentrations of ketorolac were detected compared with diclofenac.      

Development of acute opioid tolerance during infusion of remifentanil for pediatric scoliosis surgery

We tested the hypothesis that continuous intraoperative infusion of remifentanil is associated with the development of clinically relevant acute opioid tolerance in adolescents undergoing scoliosis surgery. Thirty adolescents were randomly assigned to receive an intraoperative analgesic regimen consisting of continuous remifentanil infusion or intermittent morphine alone. Postoperative analgesic consumption was assessed with a patient-controlled analgesia device that was used to self-administer morphine. Cumulative postoperative morphine consumption, pain scores, and sedation scores were recorded by a blinded investigator every hour for the first 4 h postoperatively and then every 4 h for a total of 24 h. Cumulative morphine consumption in the remifentanil group was significantly more than that in the morphine group at each time point in the initial 24 h after surgery (P < 0.0001). At 24 h after surgery, cumulative morphine consumption was 30% greater in the remifentanil group (1.65 +/- 0.41 mg/kg) than in the morphine group (1.27 +/- 0.32 mg/kg) (95% confidence interval for the difference, 0.11 to 0.65 mg/kg). Differences in pain and sedation scores were not statistically significant. These data suggest that intraoperative infusion of remifentanil is associated with the development of clinically relevant acute opioid tolerance in adolescents undergoing scoliosis surgery.     

A double-blind comparison of the relative efficacy, side effects and cost of buprenorphine and morphine in patients after cardiac surgery

The analgesic efficacy, side effects and cost of administration of regimens of intravenous buprenorphine and intravenous morphine were compared in a randomized double-blind trial performed during the first 24 h after cardiac surgery. Seven patients received buprenorphine by intermittent intravenous injection and six received morphine by continuous infusion. Both these regimens provided good analgesia for the entire 24 h period, with only mild pain at rest and moderate pain on vigorous coughing. Both regimens also produced mild respiratory depression but this was not of clinical importance: the mean arterial PCO2 in both groups was less than 45 mmHg after extubation. The major difference between drugs in the clinical setting was the ease of administration. Buprenorphine had no narcotic code restriction and could be given by intermittent intravenous injection, whereas morphine required checking and handling as a restricted drug and administration by continuous intravenous infusion. When labour and material costs were computed, over the first 24 postoperative hours, it cost $19.76 per patient to administer morphine, but only $3.16 to administer buprenorphine. Thus the use of buprenorphine injections for the first 24 h after cardiac surgery produced pain relief and respiratory depression comparable to that produced by a morphine infusion, but with a significant cost saving in terms of labour and materials.     

The efficacy of intravenous indomethacin in prevention of postoperative pain

Since intravenous prophylactic anti-inflammatory agents have been suggested to reduce or even replace opiates in postoperative pain therapy, we studied the demand for morphine in 45 patients recovering from abdominal surgery who had received a baseline infusion of either indomethacin, morphine or saline placebo. When extubated after inhalational anaesthesia, each patient received an i.v. bolus of either 0.5 mg.kg-1 indomethacin, 0.07 mg.kg-1 morphine or saline placebo. Thereafter a 20-h infusion of the same test analgesic was started, either 0.1 mg.kg-1.h-1 indomethacin, 0.03 mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine or saline placebo. For additional analgesia, a patient-controlled analgesia device (PCA) delivering 5-mg boluses of morphine was used. For the first 5 postoperative hours, significantly more (P less than 0.05) PCA morphine was needed in the indomethacin group (35 mg) than in the morphine group (24 mg), while the placebo group demanded mean 30 mg. For equal analgesia (measured by VAS and VRS) between 5-20 h, similar amounts (mean 23 and 19 mg) of PCA morphine were required in the indomethacin and morphine groups, in contrast to the placebo group (mean 40 mg) (P less than 0.001). Morphine infusion increased the total consumption of morphine by 25% as compared to placebo. We conclude that, following abdominal surgery, the analgesic effect of indomethacin infusion became apparent after the first 5 postoperative hours, thereafter reducing the demand for PCA morphine by about 40%. Continuous morphine infusion diminishes the postoperative demand for PCA morphine, but also increases the total morphine consumption.     

Effect of i.v. ketamine in combination with epidural bupivacaine or epidural morphine on postoperative pain and wound tenderness after renal surgery

We studied 60 patients undergoing operation on the kidney with combined general and epidural anaesthesia, in a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Patients were allocated to receive a preoperative bolus dose of ketamine 10 mg i.v., followed by an i.v. infusion of ketamine 10 mg h-1 for 48 h after operation, or placebo. During the first 24 h after surgery, all patients received 4 ml h-1 of epidural bupivacaine 2.5 mg ml-1. From 24 to 48 h after operation, patients received epidural morphine 0.2 mg h-1 preceded by a bolus dose of 2 mg. In addition, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with i.v. morphine (2.5 mg, lockout time 15 min) was offered from 0 to 48 h after operation. Patients who received ketamine felt significantly more sedated at 0-24 h, but not at 24-48 h after operation, compared with patients who received placebo (P = 0.002 and P = 0.127, respectively). There were no significant differences in pain (VAS) at rest, during mobilization or cough, PCA morphine consumption, sensory block to pinprick, pressure pain detection threshold assessed with an algometer, touch and pain detection thresholds assessed with von Frey hairs, peak flow or side effects other than sedation. The power of detecting a reduction in VAS scores of 20 mm in our study was 80% at the 5% significance level. We conclude that we were unable to demonstrate an (additive) analgesic or opioid sparing effect of ketamine 10 mg h-1 i.v. combined with epidural bupivacaine at 0-24 h, or epidural morphine at 24-48 h after renal surgery.      

Preemptive analgesic effects of ketorolac in ankle fracture surgery

BACKGROUND: Preemptive analgesia has been difficult to show in human experiments. If ketorolac has preemptive effects, then there may be an advantage to administering it at the beginning of surgery despite the potential for increased blood loss. METHODS: The authors performed a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of 48 patients scheduled for ankle fracture surgery in a county trauma hospital. Anesthesia management was standardized and included adequate opioid analgesia (5 microg/kg fentanyl and 0.1 mg/kg morphine). Intravenous 30 mg ketorolac was administered to 23 patients before tourniquet inflation and to 25 patients after tourniquet inflation. Visual analog scale pain scores, morphine patient-controlled analgesia consumption, nausea-vomiting, and postoperative bleeding were measured. RESULTS: The 23 patients given ketorolac before tourniquet inflation had no increase in pain postoperatively compared with their preoperative baseline (P = 0.280). The 25 patients who received ketorolac minutes later after tourniquet inflation had significant increases in their postoperative pain compared with their preoperative baseline (P = 0.00116). This effect was short-lived, and by 6 h the pain score in this group was not significantly more than it was preoperatively. Intergroup comparison showed a lower visual analog scale score at 2 (P = 0.0203) and 4 h (P = 0.00549) in the preemptive group and lower nausea scores at hour 6 (P = 0.00704). There was no difference in patient-controlled analgesia consumption between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous 30 mg ketorolac appears to have preemptive analgesic effects in patients undergoing ankle fracture repair. Ketorolac administered before tourniquet inflation prevents postoperative pain being perceived as more intense than preoperative pain.     

The morphine sparing effect of ketorolac tromethamine

A randomised, double-blind study of patients after upper abdominal surgery was undertaken to assess the analgesic efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine, a new, parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent. Postoperatively, patients received a 24-hour intramuscular infusion of either saline (n = 20), ketorolac 1.5 mg/hour (n = 21) or ketorolac 3.0 mg/hour (n = 20). Cumulative morphine requirements were measured using a patient-controlled analgesia system which delivered intravenous increments of morphine on demand. Pain was assessed by visual analogue scores. Arterial blood gas analyses were performed pre-operatively and on the first postoperative day. Patients who received low and high dose ketorolac infusions required less morphine than the control group (p less than 0.05 and p = 0.06, respectively). This was associated with significantly lower pain scores. Patients who received the higher ketorolac dose had significantly less postoperative increase in arterial carbon dioxide tensions than controls. This study suggests that ketorolac tromethamine is a useful analgesic drug with significant morphine sparing properties.     

肩关节手术后关节内应用酮洛酸、吗啡、罗哌卡因联合患者自控关节内镇痛对疼痛缓解影响的随机双盲研究

背景本研究评估关节内镇痛对手术后疼痛和镇痛药物需要量的影响。方法51例接受肩关节手术（Bankart）的患者纳入本随机双盲研究。手术结束后在关节内置入导管,随机分为3组分别注射下述药物：组1,罗哌卡因90mg（9ml）、吗啡4mg（10ml）、酮洛酸30mg（1ml）（总量20ml）;组2和组3,生理盐水（20ml）。此外,组1和组3的患者静脉注射1ml生理盐水;组2则静脉注射酮洛酸30mg（1ml）。手术后,组1通过关节内导管应用10ml 0．5％的罗哌卡因按需行手术后镇痛,而组2和组3应用生理盐水。组3是对照组。结果在最初的30和120分钟内,组1患者较组2和组3患者手术后静息和运动状态的疼痛减轻。组1患者较组2和组3手术后首次需要应用局麻药的时间延长（P〈0．001）。手术后最初24小时内,组1和组2患者的平均吗啡用量小于组3（P〈0．001）。组1和组2患者镇痛药物用量差异无显著性。与组2（P〈0．05）和组3（P〈0．001）相比,组1患者的平均满意度较高。结论与对照组相比,关节内联合应用罗哌卡因、吗啡、酮洛酸,随后按需间断应用罗哌卡因可以达到更好的疼痛缓解效果,较少的吗啡用量以及更高的患者满意度。与对照组患者相比,静脉注射酮洛酸组患者吗啡用量减少,并且治疗满意度也较高。     

Ketoprofen, diclofenac or ketorolac for pain after tonsillectomy in adults?

We have compared the analgesic and opioid sparing effect of three i.v. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with placebo in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 80 adult patients after elective tonsillectomy. A standard anaesthetic was used. After induction of anaesthesia, patients received ketoprofen 100 mg, diclofenac 75 mg or ketorolac 30 mg by i.v. infusion over 30 min. Patients in the placebo group received saline. Ketoprofen and diclofenac infusions were repeated after 12 h and ketorolac infusion at 6 h and 12 h. Oxycodone was used as rescue analgesic. Patients in the ketoprofen group requested 32% less opioid and patients in the diclofenac and ketorolac groups 42% less opioid than those in the placebo group (P < 0.05). There were one, two and six patients in the placebo, diclofenac and ketorolac groups, respectively, but none in the ketoprofen group, who did not request opioid analgesia during the study (P < 0.05, ketorolac vs placebo and ketoprofen). Visual analogue pain scores were similar in all groups. Visual analogue satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the diclofenac group compared with the placebo group. The incidence of nausea was 44-54%. There were no differences in the incidence of other adverse reactions. We conclude that all three non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were superior to placebo after tonsillectomy.      

Analgesic effect of continuous intravenous nefopam after urological surgery

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the efficacy of continuous infusion of nefopam. Indeed this analgesic is commonly used by continuous infusion by many anaesthetists to reduce its adverse effects. However whether the analgesic effect of an intermittent administration of nefopam has been proven, the efficacy of continuous infusion has not been established. STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind placebo controlled prospective randomised study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients ASA 1 to 3 undergoing planned urological surgery with laparotomy were included. At the end of surgery, bolus doses of placebo (Group 3) or nefopam 20 mg (Group 1 and 2) were administered to all the patients. Placebo (Group 3), nefopam 80 mg (Group 1) or 120 mg (Group 2) was thereafter continuously infused over 24 hours. All patients received additional analgesia with PCA morphine. We measured pain at rest and on cough with VAS.Adverse side effects such as nausea and vomiting, sedation and respiratory depression were evaluated. Mental performance was measured with mini mental status tests. RESULTS: Patients were older in the placebo group by approximately six years but anesthetic and surgical variables were not different between groups. Pain at rest and on cough was not statistically different between groups. In the placebo group, the median (interquartile range) morphine consumption reached 29 mg (13-53) whereas in patients receiving 80 and 120 mg nefopam, it levelled to 44 mg (11-54) and 35 mg (9-82) respectively (p > 0.05). Patients needed morphine during the same time period whether they received nefopam or not. Patients suffering from adverse effects were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, continuous administration of nefopam did not reduce morphine consumption nor ameliorate analgesia and thus may not be recommended in urological surgery. Nefopam pharmacokinetics when used with continuous infusion as well as surgery types and differences in age between groups may explain these results.     

Patient-controlled analgesia: effect of adding continuous infusion of morphine]

This double blind study aimed to assess the effects of a continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion of morphine added to an intermittent bolus patient controlled analgesia on morphine demand and related side-effects. Patients scheduled for abdominal and thoracic surgery (ASA 2 or 3) were randomly allocated postoperatively to three groups (n = 10 each): group 1 were given i.v. boluses of 2 mg of morphine (lockout interval = 15 min); the other two groups were given the same boluses as well as a continuous i.v. infusion of either 1 mg.kg-1 of morphine (group 2) or 2 mg.kg-1 (group 3). Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale before starting analgesia, and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 36 h. Total and bolus morphine doses were recorded at the same time. Breathing rate and the level of sedation were measured every hour and blood gases every time 40 mg of morphine had been consumed. Morphine administration was stopped if breathing rate decreased to less than 10 c.min-1, the patient became too sedated, or PaCO2 rose to more than 45 mmHg. Pain scores were similar in the three groups. Total amounts of morphine were higher in groups 2 (56.8 +/- 23.8 mg) and 3 (116.2 +/- 41.8 mg) compared with group 1 (38.2 +/- 17.8 mg) (p < 0.05). Morphine administration was stopped in 5 patients in group 3 and in 1 in group 2 because PaCO2 had risen to more than 45 mmHg. Therefore, a continuous i.v. infusion is not required in patients receiving PCA, all the more so as this has deleterious respiratory effects.     

A randomized trial of automated intermittent ropivacaine administration vs. continuous infusion in an interscalene catheter

Background

Ultrasound‐guided interscalene nerve block with ropivacaine as local anesthetic agent given as boluses or continuous infusion is the preferred pain management after major shoulder surgery. The use of automated intermittent boluses has been shown to be superior to continuous infusion in sciatic and epidural nerve block. Hypothesis: Automated intermittent boluses reduce pain after major shoulder surgery.

Methods

Seventy patients aged 18–75 years, scheduled for major shoulder surgery under general anesthesia with interscalene nerve block were included in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were allocated to either automated intermittent boluses with 16 mg ropivacaine every 2 h combined with patient‐controlled administration or to a conventional regimen of continuous infusion of 8 mg/h (4 ml/h) of ropivacaine combined with patient controlled administration (2 ml, lockout time 30 min). Pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) was assessed every 8 h postoperatively.

Results

Fifty‐seven patients completed the study, 29 in the continuous infusion group and 28 in the automated intermittent bolus group. Shoulder arthroplasty was performed in 49 (86%) of the cases. There were no significant differences in VAS score from 8 to 48 h post‐operatively. No significant difference in opioid usage was observed. The automated intermittent bolus group reported significantly less force on coughing and more hoarseness. A significantly lower volume of ropivacaine was used in the automated intermittent bolus group.

Conclusion

Automated intermittent boluses did not reduce pain or rescue opioid consumption compared with continuous infusion of ropivacaine. The automated intermittent bolus group had significantly less force on coughing and more hoarseness.     

Effects on biliary tract pressure in humans of intravenous ketorolac tromethamine compared with morphine and placebo.

This study compared the effect of ketorolac tromethamine with that of morphine and placebo on biliary tract pressure. Intraoperatively, 31 anesthetized patients received either ketorolac (30 mg IV, n = 16) or morphine (5 mg IV, n = 15) after a cholecystectomy or gallstone removal. Intrabiliary tract pressure was measured 5 min after dosing. Postoperatively, 11 patients who had undergone biliary tract surgery received 10 mg of ketorolac or placebo, according to a randomized crossover design on 2 consecutive days. Intraoperatively, the biliary tract pressure did not change significantly from baseline after ketorolac administration. In the morphine group, there was significant increase in pressure over baseline. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference between ketorolac and placebo. We conclude that ketorolac has little or no effect on biliary tract dynamics; therefore, ketorolac may be a logical choice for analgesia in those situations in which spasm of the biliary tract is undesirable.     

Analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: subacromial versus interscalene continuous infusion of ropivacaine

OBJECTIVES: A continuous infusion of local anesthetic in the subacromial space has been shown to provide superior pain relief compared with placebo. This technique has been considered as an alternative to a continuous interscalene infusion. The aim of our study is to compare these 2 techniques for pain relief after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: In a prospective randomized trial, 30 consecutive patients undergoing rotator cuff repair were included. An interscalene brachial plexus block was performed in all patients with mepivacaine 1.5% 30 mL. Then, 15 patients had an indwelling interscalene catheter inserted immediately after the block via a needle. Fifteen other patients had a subacromial catheter placed at the end of surgery by the surgeon. In both groups, a 2 mg/mL ropivacaine continuous infusion (5 mL/h) with PCA bolus (5 mL/30 min) was maintained for 48 hours. Pain was assessed in PACU and at 24 and 48 hours after surgery, at rest, and during passive motion. Total amount of oral morphine self-administered as rescue analgesia and cumulative 24-hour and 48-hour local anesthetic consumption were noted. Patient satisfaction and side effects were also noted. RESULTS: Pain during motion in PACU (0 [0 to 60] v 40 [0 to 100] mm) and at 24 hours (10 [0 to 60] v 45 [20 to 100] mm), oral morphine (0 [0 to 6] v 3.5 [0 to 10] morphine capsules), and total amount of local anesthetic at 24 hours (122.5 [120 to 170] v 143 [129 to 250] mg) were lower in the continuous interscalene group. Local anesthetic side effects were less frequent in the continuous subacromial group. Satisfaction was comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: After arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, continuous interscalene block provides better analgesia compared with continuous subacromial infusion but with an increased incidence of minor side effects.     

The effect of bupivacaine and morphine on pain and bowel function after colonic surgery

Sixty patients scheduled for colonic surgery were randomly allocated to four groups according to postoperative pain medication: I. Control group, the patients received oxycodone intramuscularly (0.15 mg kg-1) on request. II. Epidural bupivacaine (0.25%) continuously administered by infusion pump, 4-6 ml h-1, for 48 h. III. Epidural morphine, 2-6 mg, at the end of operation and repeated on the first and second postoperative mornings. IV. Epidural morphine, 2-6 mg per die, administered for 48 h continuously by infusion pump. All patients received a balanced anaesthesia with enflurane, fentanyl and vecuronium. Postoperatively, intramuscular oxycodone was given on request. There were no significant differences between the groups in changes in peak flow, spirometry and blood-gas analyses postoperatively. Pain intensity (visual analogue scale) was lower in Groups II and III at 3 h and in Group IV at 24 h compared to the control Group I. All the epidurally treated groups needed less additional analgesics than the control Group I. Postoperatively bowel movements occurred on the second day in Group II (bupivacaine) as compared to the fourth day in all other groups (P less than 0.05).     

Oxyhaemoglobin saturation following elective abdominal surgery in patients receiving continuous intravenous infusion or intramuscular morphine analgesia

Oxygen saturation was continuously measured using computerised pulse oximetry for 8 h overnight pre-operatively and for the first 24 h postoperatively in 40 patients receiving intermittent intramuscular morphine or continuous infusion of morphine following elective upper abdominal surgery. The proportion of time with an oxygen saturation less than 94% was used as an index of desaturation. Patients receiving continuous infusion analgesia received a larger morphine dose and achieved better analgesia than the intramuscular group. Postoperatively, the duration of desaturation increased 10-fold over pre-operative values, 'intramuscular' patients spending 39.0% (SD, 37.0%) and 'continuous infusion' patients 40.0% (SD, 37.5%) of the time below 94% saturation. Although newer therapies (e.g. epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia) are currently receiving greater attention, the sequelae of these more traditional analgesic techniques warrant further study.     

Morphine with or without a local anaesthetic for postoperative intrathecal pain treatment after selective dorsal rhizotomy in children

Selective dorsal rhizotomy is a surgical procedure with a selective division of posterior spinal nerve rootlets to treat spasticity in children. The extensive surgical procedure with multilevel laminectomies and the nerve root manipulation result in intense pain postoperatively. Two intrathecal (IT) regimes of pain treatment were compared in these children, concerning their pain relief and possible side-effects. In a prospective study, 12 children (3-6 years of age) with six in each group, received either intermittent IT morphine (5 microg x kg(-1) four times a day) or continuous infusion of a mixture of bupivacaine (40 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) and morphine (0.6 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1)). Pain score was lower in the bupivacaine/morphine group (0.2 +/- 1.1) compared to intermittent morphine (2 +/- 2.4) on a scale from 0 to 6 (P less than or = 0.0001). Bupivacaine/morphine resulted in a lower, but not significant, difference in pruritus and lower muscle spasm. Haemodynamic and ventilatory parameters did not differ between the groups. Intrathecal continuous infusion of bupivacaine and morphine was superior to intermittent morphine in the treatment of pain after selective dorsal rhizotomy operations.