Complete hepatocellular carcinoma necrosis following sequential porto-arterial embolization

Most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma （HCC） are not eligible for curative treatment, which is resection or transplantation. Two recent series have emphasized the potential benefits of preoperative arterio-portal embolization prior to surgical resection of such tumours. This preoperative strategy offers a better disease free survival rate and a higher rate of total tumor necrosis. In case of non resectable HCC it is now widely accepted that transarterial chemoembolization （TACE） leads to a better survival when compared to conservative treatment. Thus, the question remains whether combined portal vein embolization （PVE） may enhance the proven efficiency of TACE in patients with unresectable HCC. We herein report the case of a 56-year-old cirrhotic woman with a voluminous HCC unsuitable for surgical resection. Yet, complete turnout necrosis and prolonged survival could be achieved a~er a combined porto-arterial embolization. This case emphasizes the potential synergistic effect of a combined arterio-portal embolization and the hypothetical survival benefit of such a procedure, in selected patients, with HCC not suitable for surgery or local ablative therapy.     

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Opinion statement The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in the United States. Several modalities are available for the treatment of HCC, and decisions regarding the optimal choice of therapy are based on tumor burden and severity of liver disease. Classification systems are helpful for prognostic purposes and to guide in the choice of therapy. Surgical resection is a mainstay of therapy for patients with solitary small tumors and preserved liver function (noncirrhotic or Child-Pugh class A cirrhotic patients without portal hypertension). Unfortunately, a minority of patients is eligible for resection, and postoperative recurrence or de novo HCC is common. Liver transplantation offers the best chance of curing HCC in cirrhotic patients. Patients with a solitary tumor less than 5 cm or no more than three tumors each 3 cm or less have a survival rate of 70% with less than 20% recurrence at 5 years. Access to liver transplantation is limited by organ availability, and tumor progression during the waiting period can lead to ineligibility. Ethanol injection and radiofrequency ablation are effective modalities to ablate small tumors (generally <5 cm) in patients who are not candidates for resection or liver transplantation. These modalities can also be used to treat HCC prior to liver transplantation. Transarterial chemoembolization is used to treat patients with multifocal or large HCC who are ineligible for other therapies. Chemotherapeutic agents are infused into the tumor via the hepatic artery along with embolic material in order to induce tumor necrosis. This technique should be used in selective patients with relatively preserved liver function, absence of portal vein thrombosis, or encephalopathy. Limited data exist to support the use of this modality as a primary treatment option for small HCC. Chemotherapeutic or hormonal therapies have a limited role in the management of patients with HCC. Despite mixed outcomes, we routinely use the somatostatin analog octreotide in advanced, multifocal HCC. Emerging therapies should focus on treatment of small tumors and targeted pharmacologic therapy for advanced disease.     

Complete response with sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) showing portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT) have an extremely poor prognosis. According to treatment guidelines, the only option for HCC patients with PVTT is sorafenib chemotherapy. However, in Asia, various treatments have been attempted and possible prolongation of overall survival has been repeatedly reported. We herein report the first case of a patient with an initially unresectable advanced HCC with PVTT who underwent curative hepatectomy after sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) showing complete histological response. Two months after induction with sorafenib, a significant decrease in serum alpha-fetoprotein level was observed and computed tomography imaging showed a significant decrease in tumor size. Because of remaining PVTT, TACE and curative resection were performed. The combination of sorafenib and TACE may be an effective treatment for HCC patients with PVTT.     

Transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging system

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),the fifth most common cancer that predominantly occurs in liver cirrhosis patients,requires staging systems to design treatments. The barcelona clinic liver cancer staging system(BCLC) is the most commonly used HCC management guideline. For BCLC stage B(intermediate HCC),transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is the standard treatment. Many studies support the use of TACE in early and advanced HCC patients. For BCLC stage 0(very early HCC),TACE could be an alternative for patients unsuitable for radiofrequency ablation(RFA) or hepatic resection. In patients with BCLC stage A,TACE plus RFA provides better local tumor control than RFA alone. TACE can serve as bridge therapy for patients awaiting liver transplantation. For patients with BCLC B,TACE provides survival benefits compared with supportive care options. However,because of the substantial heterogeneity in the patient population with this stage,a better patient stratification system is needed to select the best candidates for TACE. Sorafenib represents the first line treatment in patients with BCLC C stage HCC. Sorafenib plus TACE has shown a demonstrable effect in delaying tumor progression. Additionally,TACE plus radiotherapy has yielded better survival in patients with HCC and portal venous thrombosis. Considering these observations together,TACE clearly has a critical role in the treatment of HCC as a stand-alone or combination therapy in each stage of HCC. Diverse treatment modalities should be used for patients with HCC and a better patient stratification system should be developed to select the best candidates for TACE.     

Effective treatment strategies other than sorafenib for the patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma invading portal vein

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) accompanying portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT) have relatively few therapeutic options and an extremely poor prognosis. These patients are classified into barcelonaclinic liver cancer stage C and sorafenib is suggested as the standard therapy of care. However, overall survival(OS) gain from sorafenib is unsatisfactory and better treatment modalities are urgently required. Therefore, we critically appraised recent data for the various treatment strategies for patients with HCC accompanying PVTT. In suitable patients, even surgical resection can be considered a potentially curative strategy. Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) can be performed effectively and safely in a carefully chosen population of patients with reserved liver function and sufficient collateral blood flow nearby the blocked portal vein. A recent metaanalysis demonstrated that TACE achieved a substantial improvement of OS in HCC patients accompanying PVTT compared with best supportive care. In addition, transarterial radioembolization(TARE) using yttrium-90 microspheres achieves quality-of-life advantages and is as effective as TACE. A large proportion of HCC patients accompanying PVTT are considered to be proper for TARE. Moreover, TACE or TARE achieved comparable outcomes to sorafenib in recent studies and it was also reported that the combination of radiotherapy with TACE achieved a survival gain compared to sorafenib in HCC patients accompanying PVTT. Surgical resectionbased multimodal treatments, transarterial approaches including TACE and TARE, and TACE-based appropriate combination strategies may improve OS of HCC patients accompanying PVTT.     

Transarterial chemoembolization versus transarterial radioembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: optimization of selecting treatment modality

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of intermediate stage consists of diverse tumor and patient factors in terms of tumor number, size and liver function resulting in various outcomes given by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using radioactive isotope, β-ray emitting Yttrium-90 with a short half-life and penetration depth, is an emerging intra-arterial brachytherapy characterized by potent anti-cancer effect given by radiation but minimal embolic effect. Although there is lack of study directly comparing the efficacy and safety between TACE and TARE in patients with unresectable HCC, several retrospective or small-scaled studies suggest that overall efficacy indicated by overall survival and time to progression is similar between two modalities and TARE has a superiority in the safety including postembolization syndrome, hospitalization days and outpatient-based therapy. In advanced HCC with portal vein (PV) invasion, TACE is not consistently recommended due to risk of hepatic decompensation or failure after procedure. On the contrary, available data suggest that TARE might be a promising treatment option in HCC with PV thrombosis if patient’s liver function is preserved and the level of PV invasion is less than main trunk. Ongoing trials comparing TARE and sorafenib in advanced HCC would elucidate the role of this locoregional therapy. The need of a multidisciplinary team, complex steps of procedure and high cost of TARE are the hurdles to widespread recommendation of this therapy in intermediate or advanced HCC. The optimization of selection between TACE and TARE might be dependent on availability, experience, tumor factors and patient factors.     

Multimodal therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A complementary approach to liver transplantation

Objective. To evaluate the survival benefit of multimodal therapy for the treatment of HCC.Background. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is considered the treatment of choice for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, donor organ shortages and patients whose HCCs exceed OLT criteria require consideration of alternate therapeutic options such as hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), ethanol injection (EI), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and chemotherapy (CTX). This study was performed to evaluate the survival benefit of multimodal therapy for treatment of HCC as complementary therapy to OLT.Methods. A retrospective review was conducted of HCC patients undergoing therapy following multidisciplinary review at our institution from 1996 - 2006 with a minimum of a 2 year patient follow-up. Data were available on 247/252 patients evaluated. Relevant factors at time of diagnosis included symptoms, hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) status, antiviral therapy, Child-Pugh classification, portal vein patency, and TNM staging. Patients underwent primary treatment by hepatic resection, RFA, EI, TACE, CTX, or were observed (best medical management). Patients with persistent or recurrent disease following initial therapy were assessed for salvage therapy. Survival curves and pairwise multiple comparisons were calculated using standard statistical methods.Results. Mean overall survival was 76.8 months. Pairwise comparisons revealed significant mean survival benefits with hepatic resection (93.2 months), RFA (66.2 months), and EI (81.1 months), compared with TACE (47.4 months), CTX (24.9 months), or observation (31.4 months). Shorter survival was associated with symptoms, portal vein thrombus, or Child-Pugh class B or C. HCV infection was associated with significantly shorter survival compared with HBV infection. Antiviral therapy was associated with significantly improved survival in chronic HBV and HCV patients only with earlier stage disease.Conclusion. Multimodal therapy is effective therapy for HCC and may be used as complementary treatment to OLT.     

Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

Radioembolization is a form of brachytherapy in which intra-arterially injected (90)Y-loaded microspheres serve as sources for internal radiation purposes. It produces average disease control rates above 80% and is usually very well tolerated. Main complications do not result from the microembolic effect, even in patients with portal vein occlusion, but rather from an excessive irradiation of non-target tissues including the liver. All the evidence that support the use of radioembolization in HCC is based on retrospective series or non-controlled prospective studies. However, reliable data can be obtained from the literature, particularly since the recent publication of large series accounting for nearly 700 patients. When compared to the standard of care for the intermediate and advanced stages (transarterial embolization and sorafenib), radioembolization consistently provides similar survival rates. Two indications seem particularly appealing in the boundaries of these stages for first-line radioembolization. First, the treatment of patients straddling between the intermediate and advanced stages (intermediate patients with bulky or bilobar disease that are considered poor candidates for TACE, and advanced patients with solitary tumors invading a segmental or lobar branch of the portal vein). Second, the treatment of patients that are slightly above the criteria for resection, ablation or transplantation, for which downstaging could open the door for a radical approach. Radioembolization can also be used to treat patients progressing to TACE or sorafenib. With a number of clinical trials underway, the available evidence shows that it adds a significant value to the therapeutic weaponry against HCC of tertiary care centers dealing with this major cancer problem.     

Multimodality treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract By 1996, 2898 patients with pathologically proven hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) had been treated at the Liver Cancer Institute of Shanghai Medical University. The 5 year survival in the entire series was 36.2%, being increased from 4.8% in 1958–70, 12.2% in 1971–83, to 50.5% in 1984–96 and 274 patients had survived more than 5 years. The increase in the survival rate could be attributed to the decreasing mean tumour diameter (11.7, 10.5 and 9.5 cm, respectively) and multimodality treatment. In addition to small HCC resection (5 year survival 64.9%, n = 735) and large HCC resection (5 year survival 37.4%, n = 1050), the following deserves to be mentioned. First, the 5 year survival of unresectable HCC treated by palliative surgery increased from 0% to 7.2% to 20.0%, which was related to the increase in use of multimodality treatment, particularly in those followed by second-stage resection. Second, cytoreduction and sequential resection is a new field with a significant potential in the treatment of localized unresectable HCC in a cirrhotic liver. Cytoreduction can be achieved by surgery, such as hepatic artery ligation, cannulation, cryosurgery and their combination, and followed by intrahepatic arterial chemoembolization, targeting therapy or regional radiotherapy. Ninety of 647 patients with unresectable HCC so treated had marked shrinkage of tumour and received second-stage resection; the 5 year survival was 71.4%. Third, non-surgical cytoreduction was mainly achieved by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE); for 70 patients with second-stage resection following TACE, the 5 year survival was 56.0%. Finally, re-resection of subclinical recurrence of tumour after curative HCC resection was performed in 155 patients; the 5 year survival calculated from the first resection was 50.9%, which played an important role in increasing the 5 year survival in the resection group (from 13.0% to 29.5% to 56.2%). It is concluded that multimodality treatment with combined and sequential use of different modalities and repeated use of some modalities is of substantial benefit for localized unresectable HCC.     

Current management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

The current management therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) patients are discussed in this review. Despite the development of new therapies, HCC remains a "difficult to treat" cancer because HCC typically occurs in advanced liver disease or hepatic cirrhosis. The progression of multistep and multicentric HCC hampers the prevention of the recurrence of HCC. Many HCC patients are treated with surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation(RFA), although these modalities should be considered in only selected cases with a certain HCC number and size. Although there is a shortage of grafts, liver transplantation has the highest survival rates for HCC. Several modalities are salvage treatments; however, intensive care in combination with other modalities or in combination with surgical resection or RFA might offer a better prognosis. Sorafenib is useful for patients with advanced HCC. In the near future, HCC treatment will include stronger molecular targeted drugs, which will have greater potency and fewer adverse events. Further studies will be ongoing.     

肝癌肝移植

肝移植和肝切除是目前肝癌的2种主要治疗方法。早期肝癌合并晚期肝病患者肝移植后疗效评估最佳;但是对于肝功能代偿尚可、不伴门静脉高压的早期肝癌患者来说,最佳的治疗方案仍存在争议。大量的研究证明肝移植后无病生存率更高,但是尚不清楚长期生存率如何。通过改进手术技术和实行补救性肝移植的方法可明显改善肝切除后患者生存率,且避免了可因切除治愈的患者因等待移植时间过长而失去机会。     

肝细胞癌降期转化的治疗策略

手术是肝细胞癌(HCC)最重要的根治性手段,但初诊时能获得手术切除的HCC患者不足30%。如何将不能切除转化为可根治性切除成为提高HCC生存率的重要方面,也是近年来的研究热点。目前,综合运用经肝动脉插管治疗、放射治疗、靶向治疗等方法让HCC实现降期,或者通过门静脉栓塞、联合肝脏隔断和门静脉结扎使残余肝体积快速增大,均可实现转化成功从而获得根治性切除的机会。但是,如何优化多种治疗模式,规范复杂性肝癌患者的多学科诊疗路径,提高手术切除的效率和安全性,仍需要进一步深入探讨和研究。     

Hepatozelluläres Karzinom

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitutes one of the most frequent cancers worldwide and in 80-90% develops as a consequence of liver cirrhosis. The prognosis of patients with HCC is not only dependent on the tumor stage, but also on the liver function. Patients with early HCC without extrahepatic metastasis can be successfully treated by liver transplantation, tumor resection or percutaneous tumor ablation (e.g. ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation). Meta-analyses have shown that transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) appears to be an effective treatment for more advanced tumors, at least for a subgroup of patients with good liver function. However, in approximately 50% of HCC patients these treatment options are not applicable or not effective, because they suffer from advanced tumors and/or impaired liver function. Recently a randomized placebo controlled phase III study showed that the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib significantly improves survival of patients with advanced HCC and good liver function (child A). As a consequence of this study sorafenib is now available for effective systemic treatment of patients with advanced HCC.     

Prospective cohort study of transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in 8510 patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To elucidate the survival of the patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent transcatheter arterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) and to analyze the factors affecting the survivals. METHODS: During the last 8 years, a nationwide prospective cohort study was performed in 8510 patients with unresectable HCC who underwent TACE using emulsion of lipiodol and anticancer agents followed by gelatin sponge particles as an initial treatment. Exclusion criteria were extrahepatic metastases and/or any previous treatment prior to the present TACE. The primary end point was survival. The survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The multivariate analyses for the factors affecting survival were evaluated by the Cox proportional hazard model. The mean follow-up period was 1.77 years. RESULTS: For overall survival rates by TACE, median and 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year survivals were 34 months, 82%, 47%, 26%, and 16%, respectively. Both the degree of liver damage and the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system proposed by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan demonstrated good stratification of survivals (P = .0001). The multivariate analyses showed significant difference in degree of liver damage (P = .0001), alpha-fetoprotein value (P = .0001), maximum tumor size (P = .0001), number of lesions (P = .0001), and portal vein invasion (P = .0001). The last 3 factors could be replaced by TNM stage. The TACE-related mortality rate after the initial therapy was .5%. CONCLUSIONS: TACE showed safe therapeutic modality with a 5-year survival of 26% for unresectable HCC patients. The degrees of liver damage, TNM stage, and alpha-fetoprotein values were independent risk factors for patient survival.     

Strategies to increase the resectability of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is best treated by liver transplantation, but the applicability of transplantation is greatly limited. Tumor resection in partial hepatectomy is hence resorted to. However, in most parts of the world, only 20%-30% of HCCs are resectable. The main reason for such a low resectability is a future liver remnant too small to be sufficient for the patient. To allow more HCC patients to undergo curative hepatectomy, a variety of ways have been developed to increase the resectability of HCC, mainly ways to increase the future liver remnants in patients through hypertrophy. They include portal vein embolization, sequential transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization, staged hepatectomy, two-staged hepatectomy with portal vein ligation, and Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation in Staged Hepatectomy. Herein we review, describe and evaluate these different ways, ways that can be life-saving.     

Surgical technique of hepatectomy combined with simultaneous resection of hepatic artery and portal vein for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (with video)

Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas often involve the bifurcation of the portal vein and the hepatic artery at initial presentation. Previously, vascular invasion was a major obstacle for R0 resection; therefore, such tumors were regarded as locally advanced, unresectable disease. Recently, in leading centers, these tumors have been resected using a specific technique, vascular resection and reconstruction. Vascular resection is classified into three types: portal vein resection alone, hepatic artery resection alone, and simultaneous resection of both the portal vein and hepatic artery. Of these, portal vein resection is widely performed, whereas hepatic artery resection remains controversial. Therefore, hepatectomy combined with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery represents one of the most complicated and challenging procedures in hepatobiliary surgery. The survival benefit of this extended procedure remains unproven, and there is only a single study reporting an unexpectedly favorable outcome in 50 patients. Considering the dismal survival in patients with unresectable disease, hepatic artery resection and/or portal vein resection may be a promising option of choice. However, the technique is highly demanding and has not been standardized. Therefore, this extended surgery may be allowed only in selected hepatobiliary centers.     

Outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma referred to a tertiary centre with availability of multiple treatment options including cadaveric liver transplantation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary cancer of the liver with an established causal link to viral hepatitis and other forms of chronic liver disease. Aims: The aim of this study was to analyse the determinants of outcome in patients with HCC referred to a tertiary centre for management. Method: Two hundred and thirty-five prospective patients with HCC and minimum 12-month follow-up were studied. Results: The cohort was heterogeneous, with 52% Caucasian, 40% Asian and 5% of Middle-Eastern origin. Independent predictors of outcome included tumour size and number, the presence of ascites or portal vein thrombosis, alpha-foetoprotein >50 U/L and an impaired performance status. Treatment was determined on an individual case basis by a multidisciplinary tumour team. Surgical resection was primary treatment in 43 patients, liver transplantation in 40 patients, local ablation (percutaneous radiofrequency ablation or alcohol injection) in 33 patients, transarterial chemoembolisation in 33 patients, chemotherapy or other systemic therapy in 30 patients and no treatment in 56 patients. After adjustment for significant covariates, both liver transplantation (P<0.001) and surgical resection (P=0.029) had a significant effect on patient survival compared with no treatment, but local ablation (P=0.410) and chemoembolisation (P=0.831) did not. Liver transplantation resulted in superior overall and, in particular, disease-free survival compared with surgical resection (disease-free survival 84 vs 15% at 5 years). Conclusion: In conclusion, both surgical resection and liver transplantation significantly improve the survival of patients with HCC, but improvements need to be made to the delivery of loco-regional therapy to enhance its effectiveness.     

Tumor thrombus types influence the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with the tumor thrombi in the portal vein

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the benefits of the tumor thrombus types system on determining treatments and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients (HCC) with tumor thrombi in the portal vein. METHODOLOGY: According to anatomic features of the portal vein in the liver and tumor thrombus of HCC developing modes, a uniform tumor thrombus types system (types I-IV) was first recommended. 84 HCC patients with portal vein tumor thrombi, which from January 2000 to January 2003 in the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, were divided into I-IV groups according to types I-IV of the tumor thrombus system. The median survival periods and effectiveness of surgical resection or non-resection for I-IV groups were retrospectively observed. RESULTS: The median survival periods for patients of group I (n=17), II (n=26), III (n=35) and group IV (n=6) were 10.1, 7.2, 5.7 and 3.0 months, respectively (p = 0.0001). From tumor thrombus type I to type III, the patients received surgical resection were better than that of non-resection (P = 0.0006). Among the patients receiving resection treatment, resection of tumor thrombus type I had the best effects, while for patients with tumor thrombus type IV, the results were not good. In case of non-resection treatments, the survival periods of patients with tumor thrombi type I, II and III were similar, which supposed that TACE may be of little effects on tumor thrombi. CONCLUSIONS: Types of tumor thrombus system suggested may be helpful to determine the treatments and prognosis of HCC patients with tumor thrombi in the portal vein.     

Advanced HCC: emerging molecular therapies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common complication of chronic liver disease and represents the third-leading cause of death world-wide. While the majority of cases occur in Asia, the incidence has been rising in the West for some time. This is driven not only by the Hepatitis C epidemic but also the rising incidence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and resulting liver disease. Despite its frequency, treatments for HCC have generally been limited. Curative treatments are limited to surgical resection or liver transplant for a subset of patients and locally ablative techniques such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been shown to extend survival for patients with unresectable and intermediate stage liver cancer. For patients with advanced HCC, sorafenib, a small molecule multitargeted kinase inhibitor is the only agent that has been shown to improve survival. At this time there is an abundance of research activity in HCC with an emphasis on developing new agents that target specific molecular alterations in HCC. In this review, we will focus on those agents currently in Phase III studies for front-line, second-line and other indications.