Hypofractionated radiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma

Objectives The optimal treatment for elderly patients (age >70 years) with glioblastoma (GBM) remains controversial. We conducted a prospective trial in 43 consecutive elderly patients with GBM treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) followed by adjuvant temozolomide. Patients and methods Forty-three patients 70 years of age or older with a newly diagnosed GBM and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 60 were treated with hypofractionated RT (6 fractions of 5 Gy each for a total of 30 Gy over 2 weeks) followed by up to 12 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (150–200 mg/m² for 5 days during each 28 day cycle). The HRQOL was assessed with the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire C30. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), toxicity and quality of life. Results The median OS was 9.3 months and the median PFS was 6.3 months. The 6 and 12 month survival rates were 86% and 35%, respectively. The 6 and 12 month PFS rates were 55% and 12%, respectively. In multivariate analysis KPS was the only significant independent predictive factor of survival (P = 0.008). Neurological deterioration occurred during or after RT in 16% of patients and was resolved in most cases with the use of steroids. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 28% of patients during the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment with temozolomide. The treatment had no negative effect on HRQOL, however, fatigue (P = 0.02) and constipation (P = 0.01) scales worsened over time. Conclusions Hypofractionated RT followed by temozolomide may provide survival benefit maintaining a good quality of life in elderly patients with GBM. It may represent a reasonable therapeutic approach especially in patients with less favourably prognostic factors.     

Safety and efficacy of temozolomide in patients with recurrent anaplastic oligodendrogliomas after standard radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Most primary oligodendrogliomas and mixed gliomas (oligoastrocytoma) respond to treatment with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV), with response rates of approximately 80%. However, limited data on second-line treatments are available in patients with recurrent tumors. A novel second-generation alkylating agent, temozolomide, has recently demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. This study describes the effects of temozolomide in patients with recurrent anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO) and anaplastic mixed oligoastrocytoma (AOA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with histologically confirmed AO or AOA who had received previous PCV chemotherapy were treated with temozolomide (150 to 200 mg/m2/d for 5 days per 28-day cycle). The primary end point was objective response. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression, overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability. RESULTS: Eight patients (16.7%) experienced a complete response, 13 patients (27.1%) experienced a partial response (objective response rate, 43.8%), and 19 patients (39.6%) experienced stable disease. For the entire treatment group, median PFS was 6.7 months and median OS was 10 months. For objective responders, median PFS was 13.1 months and median OS was 16 months. For complete responders, PFS was more than 11. 8 months and OS was more than 26 months. Response correlated with improved survival. Temozolomide was safe and well tolerated. Twelve patients developed grade 1/2 thrombocytopenia and three patients developed grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Temozolomide is safe and effective in the treatment of recurrent AO and AOA.     

Up-front temozolomide in elderly patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma and oligoastrocytoma

Optimal treatment of anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors (AOT) in elderly patients is debatable. We report a retrospective study of 44 consecutive patients aged 70 years or older [median age: 74 years; median Karnofsky performance status (KPS): 70] treated with up-front chemotherapy using temozolomide (TMZ) at conventional doses until tumor progression. O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter (MGMTP) methylation was assessed in 38 patients. Of the 41 evaluable patients, partial response (PR) was seen in 13 (32%) patients, 17 (41%) patients achieved stable disease, while the disease progressed in 11 (27%) patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.9 and 12.4 months, respectively. Hematoxicity grades 3?C4 occurred in nine patients (20%). MGMTP was methylated in 50% of patients and was associated with both longer PFS (8.7 versus 5.7 months, P = 0.01) and longer OS (16.1 versus 12.4 months, P = 0.05). The rate of responders to chemotherapy was similar in MGMTP-methylated (38%) and in MGMTP-unmethylated patients (31%), but duration of response was significantly longer in responders with methylated MGMTP than in responders with unmethylated MGMTP (16.1 versus 9.6 months, P = 0.0004). This study demonstrates that a substantial number of elderly patients with AOT can achieve prolonged survival with up-front chemotherapy using TMZ. Further investigation is needed to determine whether this treatment is preferable to initial radiation therapy.     

Temozolomide as First-Line Agent in Treating High-Grade Gliomas: Phase II Study

Temozolomide a recent, oral, second generation alkylating agent is a chemotherapeutic with demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of high-grade gliomas; its efficacy has been demonstrated in both pre-clinical and phase I and II studies. The goal of this study is to determine the activity and safety of temozolomide in improving overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and health-related quality of life (HQL) in patient with malignant gliomas. Forty-two patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma and anaplastic oligodendroglioma were studied. The mean follow-up period was 12 months. The overall response rate (only responsive patient) for all histological groups was 40%, 10 patients (24%) showed a stabilization of disease. The median PFS and OS was respectively 8.35 and 14.1 months: time to progression was 34 week ranging from 21 to 47. In all patients, treatment with temozolomide was associated with improvement of performance status including the patient showing disease progression: Karnofski score improved in all patients by a minimum of 10, with a median of 20 at 6 months. No patient stopped the treatment due to side-effects, no major adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: Temozolomide appears to be an ideal, first-line, single-agent, with a safe profile and demonstrated HQL benefits in patients with high-grade gliomas.     

Phase II and pharmacogenomics study of enzastaurin plus temozolomide during and following radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme and gliosarcoma

This open-label, single-arm, phase II study combined enzastaurin with temozolomide plus radiation therapy (RT) to treat glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and gliosarcoma. Adults with newly diagnosed disease and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 60 were enrolled. Treatment was started within 5 weeks after surgical diagnosis. RT consisted of 60 Gy over 6 weeks. Temozolomide was given at 75 mg/m(2) daily during RT and then adjuvantly at 200 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days, followed by a 23-day break. Enzastaurin was given once daily during RT and in the adjuvant period at 250 mg/day. Cycles were 28 days. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and correlations between efficacy and molecular markers analyzed from tumor tissue samples were also evaluated. A prospectively planned analysis compared OS and PFS of the current trial with outcomes from 3 historical phase II trials that combined novel agents with temozolomide plus RT in patients with GBM or gliosarcoma. Sixty-six patients were enrolled. The treatment regimen was well tolerated. OS (median, 74 weeks) and PFS (median, 36 weeks) results from the current trial were comparable to those from a prior phase II study using erlotinib and were significantly better than those from 2 other previous studies that used thalidomide or cis-retinoic acid, all in combination with temozolomide plus RT. A positive correlation between O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation and OS was observed. Adjusting for age and KPS, no other biomarker was associated with survival outcome. Correlation of relevant biomarkers with OS may be useful in future trials.     

Hypofractionated radiotherapy with or without concurrent temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a review of ten-year single institutional experience

The landmark Stupp study demonstrated a survival advantage with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) with standard radiotherapy (RT) in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients but excluded those older than 70 years. The prospective Roa study of older GBM patients treated with hypofractionated 3-week course RT demonstrated equivalence to standard 6-week course RT. Taken together, these trials suggest hypofractionated RT with TMZ may be a reasonable treatment option for elderly GBM patients. We conducted a retrospective review of GBM patients (age ≥60 years) treated with hypofractionated RT and temozolomide at our institution between 2000 and 2010. We identified 112 patients who received hypofractionated RT, with 57 receiving concurrent and adjuvant TMZ and 55 without concurrent chemotherapy. Of the 55 patients who received hypofractionated RT alone initially, 24 subsequently received TMZ as salvage treatment at time of progression. Among the concurrent RT + TMZ patients, mean age was 70 years (range 60–86), median KPS was 80 (range 30–100) and 24/57 (42%) received prior debulking surgery. Median overall survival (OS) among the RT + TMZ patients was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.5–8.6). Patients without concurrent chemotherapy were similar in demographics (age, sex, corticosteroid use, KPS) except 34/55 (62%) were debulked (P-value 0.045.) Median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 5.9–11.8) (P-value 0.351). Sub-group analysis revealed patients treated with initial hypofractionated radiation with salvage TMZ had increased median OS of 13.3 months (95% CI, 9.9–19.3) (P-value 0.012). Our results suggest concurrent and adjuvant TMZ does not confer a survival benefit in elderly GBM patients. A sequential approach may be a more effective and efficient strategy by selecting responding patients who may benefit most from subsequent salvage chemotherapy.     

Toxicity from chemoradiotherapy in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme

Objectives The optimal treatment for elderly patients (age > 70 years) with glioblastoma remains controversial. We conducted a prospective trial in 32 consecutive elderly patients with glioblastoma who underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT) plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. Patients and Methods 32 patients 70 years of age or older with a newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 70 were treated with RT (daily fractions of 2 Gy for a total of 60 Gy) plus temozolomide at the dose of 75 mg/m² per day followed by six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (150–200 mg/m² for 5 days during each 28-day cycle). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity. Results The median OS was 10.6 months and the median PFS was 7 months. The 6-month and 12-month survival rates were 91% and 37%, respectively. The 6-month and 12-month PFS rates were 56% and 16%, respectively. In multivariate analysis KPS was the only significant independent predictive factor of survival (P = 0.01). Adverse effects were mainly represented by neurotoxicity (40%), which resolved in most cases with the use of steroids, and Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity in 28% of patients. Chemotherapy was stopped in 2 patients, delayed in 9 patients and reduced in 4 patients. Conclusions Standard RT plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is a feasible treatment for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who present with good prognostic factors.     

Multi-institutional phase II study of temozolomide administered twice daily in the treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas is poor and treatment options are limited. Current chemotherapeutic regimens can improve clinical outcomes, but extend survival by only a few months. Temozolomide is a methylating agent that is typically administered once daily. Because preclinical studies suggested that a twice-daily dosing schedule might be more effective, the safety and efficacy of twice-daily dosing of temozolomide were studied in patients with recurrent gliomas at their first, second, or third recurrence. METHODS: This multi-institutional trial enrolled 120 patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), or anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO). An initial oral dose of 200 mg/m(2) of temozolomide was followed by 9 consecutive doses of 90-mg/m(2) every 12 hours. Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days. Doses were escalated to 100 mg/m(2) twice daily in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or were reduced if unacceptable toxicity occurred. RESULTS: For GBM, AA, and AO patients, respectively, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months, 5.8 months, and 7.7 months, whereas the median overall survival (OS) was 8.8 months, 14.6 months, and 18 months. The overall response rate (partial and complete) for the GBM, AA, and AO patients was 31%, 46%, and 46%, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (1.1%), thrombocytopenia (3.6%), and anemia (0.3%) (graded according to the World Health Organization grading system). CONCLUSIONS: Twice-daily dosing may enhance the efficacy of temozolomide in the treatment of recurrent gliomas without increasing toxicity. This regimen compares favorably with other dosing schedules of temozolomide reported in the literature.     

Correlation between O<Superscript>6</Superscript>-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and survival in elderly patients with glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide

Epigenetic silencing of the O⁶-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene by promoter methylation is correlated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) who receive alkylating agents. The aim of this study is to determine the correlation between MGMT and survival in elderly patients with GBM treated with radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ). Eighty-three patients aged 70 years or older with histologically confirmed GBM treated with RT plus TMZ between February 2005 and September 2009 were investigated in this study. The methylation status of the MGMT promoter was determined by polymerase chain reaction analysis. Median PFS and OS were 7.5 and 12.8 months, respectively. The MGMT promoter was methylated in 42 patients (50.6%) and unmethylated in 41 patients (49.4%). Median OS was 15.3 months in methylated patients and 10.2 months in unmethylated patients (P = 0.0001). Median PFS was 10.5 months in methylated tumors and 5.5 months in unmethylated tumors (P = 0.0001). On multivariate analysis MGMT methylation status emerged as the strongest independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS (P = 0.004 and P = 0.005, respectively). The results of the present study suggest that MGMT methylation status might be an important prognostic factor associated with better OS and PFS in elderly patients with GBM treated with RT and TMZ.     

Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials.

PURPOSE: To determine aggregate outcomes and prognostic covariates in patients with recurrent glioma enrolled onto phase II chemotherapy trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients from eight consecutive phase II trials included 225 with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and 150 with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma (AA). Their median age was 45 years (range, 15 to 82 years) and their median Karnofsky performance score was 80 (range, 60 to 100). Prognostic covariates were analyzed with respect to tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) by multivariate logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 34 (9%) had complete or partial response, whereas 80 (21%) were alive and progression-free at 6 months (APF6). The median PFS was 10 weeks and median OS was 30 weeks. Histology was a robust prognostic factor across all outcomes. GBM patients had significantly poorer outcomes than AA patients. The APF6 proportion was 15% for GBM and 31% for AA, whereas the median PFS was 9 weeks for GBM and 13 weeks for AA. Results were also significantly poorer for patients with more than two prior surgeries or chemotherapy regimens. CONCLUSION: Histology is a dominant factor in determining outcome in patients with recurrent glioma enrolled onto phase II trials. Future trials should be designed with separate histology strata.     

A pilot study of primary temozolomide chemotherapy and deferred radiotherapy in elderly patients with glioblastoma

There is no standard of care for elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). In 15 consecutive patients (median age 79 years) treated with temozolomide (TMZ) (42 days on; 14 days off), median survival was 6 months (range 4–14 months). This pilot study suggests that low dose daily TMZ may represent an alternative and equally effective treatment to more traditionally administered radiotherapy.     

Low-dose fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme with poor prognosis: a feasibility study

We explored the feasibility of concurrent palliative chemotherapy and low-dose fractionated radiotherapy (LD-FRT) in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Patients with recurrent/progressive GBM at least 3 months after the end of primary radiotherapy received 0.3 Gy twice daily with cisplatin and fotemustine if progressing on temozolomide, or 0.4 Gy twice daily with temozolomide if recurrent 4-6 months later (retreatment group). Newly diagnosed GBM with gross residual mass received 30 Gy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide and 0.4 Gy twice daily from the second adjuvant cycle (naive group) for 2-4 cycles. Twenty-six patients were enrolled. In the retreatment group (n = 17; median LD-FRT total dose 7.2 Gy [range 2.4-11.6]), grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity was observed in 5.9% of patients. Median follow-up time was 20 months (range 4-35). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of recurrence or progression were 4 and 8 months, respectively (OS at 6 months, 69%; at 12 months, 16.7%). In the naive group (n = 9; median LD-FRT total dose 8 Gy [range 3.2-16]), grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity was observed in 11.1% of patients. Median follow-up time was 17 months (range 8-20)-median PFS was 9 months, with PFS at 6 months and at 1 year of 66.7% and 26.7%, respectively; and median OS was 12 months, with OS at 6 months and at 1 year of 77.8% and 34.6%, respectively. LD-FRT with concurrent chemotherapy was well tolerated.     

Phase II study of temozolomide, thalidomide, and celecoxib for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults

We conducted a phase II study of the combination of temozolomide and angiogenesis inhibitors for treating adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients who had stable disease following standard radiation therapy received temozolomide for 5 days in 28-day cycles, in combination with daily thalidomide and celecoxib. Patients were treated until tumor progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. Four-month progression-free survival (PFS) from study enrollment was the primary end point, and overall survival (OS) was the secondary end point. In addition, we sought to correlate response with O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status and serum levels of angiogenic peptides. Fifty patients with glioblastoma were enrolled (18 women, 32 men). Median age was 54 years (range, 29-78) and median KPS score was 90 (range, 70-100). From study enrollment, median PFS was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.2-8.0) and 4-month PFS was 63% (95% CI: 46%-75%). Median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI: 8.5-16.4) and 1-year OS was 47%. Of the 47 patients evaluable for best response, none had a complete response, five (11%) had partial response, four (9%) had minor response, 22 (47%) had stable disease, and 16 (34%) had progressive disease. Analysis of serial serum samples obtained from 47 patients for four angiogenic peptides failed to show a significant correlation with response or survival for three of the peptides; higher vascular endothelial growth factor levels showed a trend toward correlation with decreased OS (p=0.07) and PFS (p=0.09). The addition of celecoxib and thalidomide to adjuvant temozolomide was well tolerated but did not meet the primary end point of improvement of 4-month PFS from study enrollment.     

Impact of age and co-morbidities in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a pooled data analysis of three prospective mono-institutional phase II studies

To analyse the impact of age and co-morbidities on compliance and outcomes in GBM patients enrolled in three prospective phase II trials. GBM patients (??18?years) were treated with radiotherapy (60?Gy) or enrolled in a Fractionated Stereotactic Conformal-Radiotherapy Phase II trial (69.4?Gy). Concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy with Temozolomide (TMZ) was administered. Charlson Index Co-morbidity (CCI) was used to assess co-morbidity. Toxicity was evaluated according to RTOG score. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan?CMaier. Influence of age and co-morbidity was evaluated using log-rank test. From 2001 to 2008, 146 patients were enrolled: 56 (38.4?%) aged over 65 and 90 under 65. CCI ??1 was observed in 41?% of elderly and 22?% of young group. Patients?? compliance was 97.9?% for radio-chemotherapy. Acute toxicity was mild with no difference between the groups. Global median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 12 and 18?months, respectively. Age, surgery and radiation dose correlated with survival (p?=?0.01, p?=?0.04 and p?=?0.03). CCI ??2 did not show any influence on OS. Our data show that elderly with a good performance status and few co-morbidity may be treated as younger patients; moreover, age confirms a negative impact on survival while CCI ??2 did not correlated with OS.     

A phase II study of temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial malignant glioma before radiation therapy

Temozolomide is a novel second-generation oral alkylating agent with demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and anaplastic astrocytoma (AA). A multicenter phase II trial was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of temozolomide before radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed GBM and AA. Fifty-seven patients (51 adult, 6 pediatric) with newly diagnosed supratentorial GBM or AA were treated with temozolomide (200 mg/m ( 2 ) per day for 5 consecutive days every 28 days) for a maximum of 4 cycles. All patients were then treated with external beam radiotherapy. Twenty-two patients (39%) achieved objective response, including 6 (11%) with complete response (CR) and 16 (28%) with partial response (PR). Additionally, 18 (32%) patients had stable disease (SD). Of 21 patients (18 adult, 3 pediatric) with AA, 2 (10%) achieved CR, 5 (24%) achieved PR, and 8 (38%) had SD. Among adult patients with AA, the median progression-free and overall survival rates were 7.6 and 23.5 months, respectively. Among 36 patients (33 adult, 3 pediatric) with GBM, 4 (11%) had CR, 11 (31%) had PR, and 10 (28%) had SD. The median progression-free and overall survival rates among adult patients with GBM were 3.9 and 13.2 months, respectively. Temozolomide was safe and well tolerated in adult and pediatric patients. Grades 3 and 4 adverse events were reported in 16 (28%) and 7 (12%) patients, respectively. Temozolomide was safe and effective in treating newly diagnosed GBM and AA before radiotherapy. This pre-irradiation treatment approach appears promising, but will require additional evaluation in comparative studies.     

The added value of concurrently administered temozolomide versus adjuvant temozolomide alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Purpose Temozolomide (TMZ), given concurrently with radiotherapy (RT) and as adjuvant monotherapy afterwards, has led to improved survival in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). However, it is unclear whether its primary mechanism of action is through enhancement of radiation response, independent cytotoxicity, or both. We sought to determine the relative contribution of concomitant temozolomide in patients treated by concurrent and adjuvant TMZ versus adjuvant TMZ alone in the setting of newly diagnosed GBM. Methods and Materials We identified patients diagnosed with GBM and treated with surgery, involved-field radiotherapy, and chemotherapy at MGH between 2002 and 2004. Eligible patients received either adjuvant temozolomide alone (group 1) or temozolomide concurrently with RT followed by adjuvant TMZ (group 2). The primary endpoint of this retrospective analysis was overall survival (OS). Results Forty-three patients (group 1, n = 21; group 2, n = 22) were included in this study. The median follow-up was 33.7 months for surviving patients. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between these two groups. On univariate analysis, patients who received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide experienced a 2-year OS of 51% and median survival of 25.5 months, compared with a 2-year OS of 36% and median survival of 15.6 months for group 1 patients (P < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) favoring concurrent TMZ trended towards significance (HR = 0.51, P = 0.08) despite modest patient numbers. Conclusions Concurrent and adjuvant TMZ was associated with improved survival compared to adjuvant TMZ alone, highlighting the potentiation of radiation effect by temozolomide in the clinical setting. Statement of originality: This work is completely original and has not been published or presented elsewhere. John W. Henson and Bindu Avutu contributed equally to this publication.     

Survival Analysis of Glioblastoma Multiforme

Introduction: To evaluate the survival of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). Material and Methods: Patients witha pathological diagnosis of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) between 1 January 1994 and 30 November 2013, wereretrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria: 1) GBM patients with confirmed pathology, 2) GBM patients were treatedby multimodality therapy. Exclusion criteria: 1) GBM patients with unconfirmed pathology, 2) GBM patients with spinalinvolvement, 3) GBM patients with incomplete data records. Seventy-seven patients were treated by multimodalitytherapy such as surgery plus post-operative radiotherapy (PORT), post-operative Temozolomide (TMZ) concurrent withradiotherapy (CCRT), post-operative CCRT with adjuvant TMZ. The overall survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meiermethod and the log-rank test was used to compare the survival curves. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered to bestatistically significant. Results: Seventy-seven patients with a median age of 53 years (range 4-76 years) showeda median survival time (MST) of 12 months. In subgroup analyses, the PORT patients revealed a MST of 11 monthsand 2 year overall survival (OS) rates were 17.2%, the patients with post-operative CCRT with or without adjuvantTMZ revealed a MST of 23 months and 2 year OS rates were 38.2%. The MST of patients by Recursive PartitioningAnalysis (RPA), classifications III, IV, V, VI were 26.8 months, 14.2 months, 9.9 months, and 4.0 months, (p <0.001).Conclusions: The MST of the patients who had post-operative CCRT with or without adjuvant TMZ was better thanthe PORT group. The RPA classification can be used to predict survival. Multimodality therapy demonstrated the mosteffective treatment outcome. Temozolomide might be beneficial for GBM patients in order to increase survival time.     

Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin or capecitabine in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the outcome of 140 patients aged > or = 70 years of age who received first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer within the German phase III trial of FUFOX (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin) versus CAPOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty (30%) elderly patients of 476 total patients were identified, and 138 patients received the CAPOX or FUFOX treatment. RESULTS: Overall, treatment was well tolerated, and grade 3/4 toxicities were similar in both groups, with more gastrointestinal side effects in the elderly group but less neurosensory side effects. The response rate (RR) was comparable between both cohorts (49% in elderly patients vs. 52% in patients aged < 70 years). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months for patients aged > or = 70 years and 7.5 months for patients aged < 70 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% CI, 0.86-1.34). With regard to the chemotherapy regimen, there was no inferiority between FUFOX and CAPOX in patients aged > or = 70 years (7.9 months vs. 7.6 months). The median overall survival (OS) between FUFOX and CAPOX was comparable in patients aged > or = 70 years (14.4 months vs. 14.2 months). However, when compared with patients aged < 70 years, the median OS was significantly shorter (18.8 months vs. 14.4 months; P = 0.013; HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07-1.76). This was consistent with our multivariate analysis, which revealed that age > or = 70 years was a negative factor for OS. CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU/leucovorin or capecitabine was generally well tolerated in elderly patients. Elderly patients had similar PFS and overall RRs compared with the population aged < 70 years, but the OS was shorter.     

Phase 2 study of temozolomide and Caelyx in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

Temozolomide has established activity in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Caelyx (liposomal doxorubicin) has established activity in a broad range of tumors but has not been extensively evaluated in the treatment of GBM. Phase 1 data suggest that temozolomide and Caelyx can be combined safely at full dose. In this phase 2 study, combination temozolomide (200 mg/m(2) orally, days 1-5) and Caelyx (40 mg/m(2) i.v., day 1) was given every 4 weeks to a cohort of 22 patients with recurrent GBM, who received a total of 109 cycles (median 3.5 cycles). The median age of the patients was 55 years (range, 31-80 years), and 17 were male. All patients had received radiotherapy, but only 2 had received prior chemotherapy. One patient (5%) had a complete response, 3 patients (14%) had a partial response, and 11 patients (50%) had stable disease. The median time to progression for the cohort was 3.2 months (range, 1-13 months). Median overall survival was 8.2 months (range, 1-16+ months). Seven patients (32%) were progression free at 6 months. Hematological toxicity included grade 3/4 neutropenia in 4 patients (18%) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 4 patients (18%). Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity included rash in 3 patients (14%), nausea and vomiting in 1 patient (4%), hypersensitivity reaction to Caelyx in 3 patients (14%), and palmar-plantar toxicity in 1 patient (4%). We conclude that the combination of temozolomide and Caelyx is well tolerated, results in a modest objective response rate, but has encouraging disease stabilization in the treatment of recurrent GBM.     

Efficacy of protracted dose-dense temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma

The current standard therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is multimodal, comprising surgical resection plus radiotherapy and concurrent temozolomide, then adjuvant temozolomide for 6 months. This has been shown to provide survival benefits; however, the prognosis for these patients remains poor, and most relapse. The objective of this prospective Phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of protracted, dose-dense temozolomide therapy (100 mg/m² for 21 consecutive days of a 28-day cycle) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma or grade 3 gliomas who had previously received standard therapy. Of the 25 patients included (median age 50 years), 20 were evaluable for radiologic response. Two patients had partial responses and 10 had stable disease (60% overall clinical benefit); 8 patients (40%) progressed after the first treatment cycle. Five patients were not assessed for radiologic response due to early clinical progression but were included in the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. The median follow-up time was 7 months (range, 1–14 months). The median PFS was 3 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.8–4.2) and the median OS was 7 months (95% CI 5.1–8.9). The 6-month PFS rate (primary endpoint) was 17.3% (95% CI 1.7–32.2) and the 1-year OS rate was 12% (95% CI −1–25). This regimen was well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event was lymphopenia (grade 3–4 in 20 patients); no opportunistic infections were reported. Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 2 patients (grade 4 hepatic toxicity and thrombocytopenia). These data suggest that protracted, dose-dense temozolomide had modest activity with manageable toxicity in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma previously treated with temozolomide.