Adrenergic activity and left ventricular function during treatment of essential hypertension with calcium antagonists

The effects of 2 calcium antagonist drugs, verapamil and nifedipine, on blood pressure, heart rate (HR), plasma catecholamines, plasma renin activity and some echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular anatomy and function were studied in 67 patients with essential hypertension. The short- and long-term antihypertensive effect of verapamil was not associated with significant changes in HR, plasma catecholamines or plasma renin activity; the decrease in blood pressure after nifedipine was associated with a significant increase in HR and plasma catecholamines (mainly noradrenaline) (p less than or equal to 0.05). These findings were confirmed in a crossover comparison in 12 hospitalized patients treated with verapamil and nifedipine for 8 days each. The dose of isoproterenol that increased HR by 25 beats/min was significantly increased during verapamil treatment (p less than 0.05) and decreased during nifedipine treatment (p less than 0.01). Stroke volume and shortening fraction increased slightly but significantly (p less than 0.05) with 3 months of nifedipine treatment, while no change was detected with verapamil treatment. Left ventricular mass was significantly decreased after effective antihypertensive treatment for 3 months with verapamil or nifedipine (p less than or equal to 0.05).     

Effects of calcium antagonists on the hypertensive kidney

Summary This review focuses on the effects of calcium antagonists on renal function in hypertensive human subjects. Specifically assessed are the acute and chronic effects of diltiazem, verapamil, amlodipine, felodipine, isradipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, and nitrendipine on glomerular filtration rate; effective renal plasma flow/renal blood flow; renal vascular resistance; and urinary protein excretion. Among the calcium antagonists, only the dihydropyridine derivatives have been demonstrated consistently to acutely increase effective renal plasma flow/renal blood flow. The acute effects on glomerular filtration rate are variable. With respect to chronic therapy, many of the calcium antagonists have been reported to produce sustained increases in the effective renal plasma flow/renal blood flow and/or the glomerular filtration rate. Renal vascular resistance is reduced. Although calcium antagonists preserve or improve renal perfusion and glomerular filtration, long-term clinical trials are required to determine their potential therapeutic benefit to modify the natural course of hypertensive renal disease.     

Calcium antagonists in the treatment of hypertension. An overview

The availability of calcium antagonists has provided yet another therapeutic option in the management of hypertension. Calcium antagonists lower the blood pressure in hypertensive individuals while preserving the blood flow at the microcirculatory level. While all the available calcium antagonists are effective in the treatment of hypertension, they differ in their hemodynamic and pharmacologic actions. Nifedipine appears to be suitable for immediate treatment of severe hypertension and for chronic treatment of uncomplicated or refractory hypertension. In some but not all patients, co-administration of a beta-blocker is necessary to blunt reflex tachycardia. This problem is less likely with the tablet/long-acting formulation of nifedipine. Verapamil and diltiazem are useful as initial therapy for chronic mild-to-moderate hypertension. They are as effective as other first-line drugs in the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension. The heart rate with verapamil or diltiazem does not change or is slightly reduced, thus contrasting with nifedipine. Experience to date suggests that calcium antagonists do not cause adverse biochemical effects and in this respect are superior to diuretics and certain beta-blockers. Currently, verapamil is available as a sustained release preparation. In the near future, nifedipine or diltiazem may also be available in the long acting formulation to permit simplicity and to enhance patient compliance in the treatment of hypertension.     

Adverse hemodynamic and clinical effects of calcium channel blockade in pulmonary hypertension secondary to obliterative pulmonary vascular disease

The hemodynamic and clinical responses to calcium channel blockade with verapamil and nifedipine were compared with those of hydralazine in 12 patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to obliterative pulmonary vascular disease. All three drugs produced a marked and similar decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance; however, this was accompanied by a significant increase in cardiac index with hydralazine (+0.71 liter/min per m2, p less than 0.01), no change in cardiac index with nifedipine and a significant decrease in cardiac index with verapamil (-0.25 liter/min per m2, p less than 0.05). Mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased markedly with both calcium channel blocking drugs (-16.0 mm Hg with verapamil and -14.5 mm Hg with nifedipine, both p less than 0.01), but this was associated with a concomitant increase in mean right atrial pressure (+6.2 mm Hg with verapamil and +4.4 mm Hg with nifedipine, both p less than 0.01); neither variable changed after hydralazine. Hence, right ventricular performance (as reflected by right ventricular stroke work index) deteriorated during treatment with both calcium channel blocking drugs, despite the decrease in resistance to right ventricular ejection; in contrast, right ventricular stroke work index increased after hydralazine. The unfavorable hemodynamic effects of calcium channel blockade were accompanied by severe adverse clinical events, including profound hypotension and cardiogenic shock during acute drug administration and the exacerbation of right heart failure during long-term treatment. These deleterious responses to verapamil and nifedipine are likely the result of a direct depressant effect exerted by these drugs on right ventricular function independent of their pulmonary vasodilatory actions.     

Nifedipine in congestive heart failure: effects on resting and exercise hemodynamics and regional blood flow

Ten patients with moderate to severe congestive heart failure (CHF) underwent central and regional hemodynamic measurements at rest and central hemodynamic measurements during exercise before and after the oral administration of nifedipine (0.2 mg/kg). Nifedipine significantly decreased systemic blood pressure, systemic vascular resistance, pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Stroke volume and cardiac output increased after nifedipine. The measured parameters of left ventricular inotropy did not change significantly for this calcium channel blocker. While blood flow to renal, hepatic, and limb vascular beds increased (p less than 0.05 for renal and limb) after nifedipine, only limb blood flow increased in proportion to the increase in cardiac output, suggesting preferential dilatation of limb vasculature. Although initial-dose nifedipine did not increase exercise duration, it elicited an improvement in exercise hemodynamics by reducing systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and increasing stroke volume and cardiac output. The calcium channel blocker, nifedipine, can be administered safely in the setting of ventricular failure and appears to favorably alter resting and exercise hemodynamics. A select number of patients with CHF may benefit from its long-term administration.     

Effects of chronic calcium channel blockade on sympathetic nerve activity in hypertension

The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is an important regulator of the circulation. Its activity is increased in hypertension and heart failure and adversely affects prognosis. Although certain drugs inhibit SNS, dihydropyridine calcium antagonists may stimulate the system. Phenylalkylamine calcium antagonists such as verapamil have a different pharmacological profile. We therefore tested the hypothesis of whether amlodipine, nifedipine, or verapamil differs in the effects on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSA). Forty-three patients (31 men, 12 women) with mild to moderate hypertension were randomly assigned to 1 drug for 8 weeks. Blood pressure, heart rate, and MSA (by microneurography) were measured at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. All calcium antagonists led to a similar decrease in blood pressure of 5.0+/-1.5 to 6.4+/-1.4 mm Hg at 8 weeks (P<0.001 versus baseline). There were no significant differences in MSA between groups. With amlodipine, MSA averaged 49+/-3 bursts/min (3 versus baseline); with nifedipine, 48+/-3 bursts/min (2 versus baseline); and with verapamil, 49+/-2 bursts/min (all, P=NS). With verapamil, norepinephrine decreased by 4% but tended to increase by about one third with amlodipine or nifedipine (P=NS). Thus, in hypertension slow release forms of verapamil, nifedipine, and amlodipine exert comparable antihypertensive effects and do not change MSA, although there was a trend toward decreased MSA and plasma norepinephrine with verapamil.     

Calcium antagonism--a new concept for treating essential hypertension

Research on calcium antagonists has been prompted by the observation that the powerful vasodilatory effect of verapamil, as well as other calcium antagonists, is enhanced in hypertensive patients. Increased vascular resistance, seen in most types of hypertension, is determined by the intracellular free calcium concentration. The finding of an increased vascular responsiveness to calcium-channel blockade and the direct relation between the degree of antihypertensive response and the height of pretreatment blood pressure indicate abnormal intracellular calcium handling in patients with essential hypertension. This is supported by the observation that the intracellular free calcium concentration was significantly increased in patients with essential hypertension compared with normotensive subjects. The decrease in blood pressure with calcium antagonists was directly correlated with the patient's age and inversely with the pretreatment plasma renin activity. There was comparable antihypertensive efficacy among verapamil, nifedipine and nitrendipine. Increased understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms in essential hypertension and pharmacotherapeutic studies have led to a new strategy for treatment of high blood pressure--in which calcium antagonists may be used, at least in part, as alternatives to diuretic drugs primarily in older and low renin patients with essential hypertension.     

Vascular protective effects of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists: Theoretical basis for a combination therapy in hypertension and other cardiovasular diseases

Hypertension is an important cardiovascular risk factor. High blood pressure per se is not a disease but a hemodynamic alteration associated with vascular disease. Two classes of drugs are especially effective in lowering blood pressure and preventing cardiovascular complications, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium antagonists. The hemdynamic effects of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists are complementary. While ACE inhibitors inhibit the renin-angiotensin system and reduce sympathetic outflow, calcium antagonists dilate large conduit and resistance arteries. Certain calcium antagonists, such as verapamil, lower heart rate. In the blood vessel wall, the local vascular effects of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists are also complementary. While ACE inhibitors inhibit activation of angiotensin I into angiotensin II and prevent the breakdown of bradykinin (which stimulates nitric oxide and prostacyclin formation), calcium antagonists inhibit the effects of vasoconstrictor hormones such as angiotensin II at the level of vascular smooth muscle by reducing calcium inflow and facilitating the vasodilator effects of nitric oxide. Calcium antagonists reduce smooth muscle cell proliferation and atherosclerosis. In hypertensive animals, verapamil and trandolapril normalize endothelial dysfunction. In large angiographic trials, nifedipine and nicardipine reduced the development of new atherosclerotic plaques. After myocardial infarction, verapamil reduces mortality and cardiac events in patients without heart failure. In contrast, ACE inhibitors are effective after myocardial infarction in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Urinary albumin excretion rate decreases during ACE inhibitor therapy or with a calcium antagonist such as verapamil; combination of the two drugs has an additive effect. In resistance arteries, hypertension is associated with an increased media/lumen ratio. ACE inhibitors, but not beta-blockers, markedly improve these structural changes. In summary, ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists have a complementary profile, both in their hemodynamic and local vascular action. Hence, combination therapy with these two classes of drugs appears particularly useful in patients with hypertension, not only to lower blood pressure, but hopefully to achieve improved cardiovascular protection.     

Heart rate variability in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes treated with long acting calcium antagonists

BACKGROUND: Enhanced sympathetic activity is a potential cause of increased risk of cardiovascular complications during treatment of hypertension and type 2 diabetes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Heart rate variability (HRV) was assessed before and after 12-16 weeks of treatment with calcium antagonists in 89 patients with mild and moderate hypertension. RESULTS: Changes of majority of parameters of 24 hour blood pressure monitoring were in general favorable however lowering of magnitude and rate of morning blood pressure rise was observed only in verapamil treated patients. Analysis of HRV showed that treatment with all long acting calcium antagonists under study was associated with enhancement of sympathetic activity. In supine position nifedipine treated compared with verapamil treated patients exhibited greater sympathetic activity. In upright position changes of HRV parameters characteristic for increased sympathetic activity were also more pronounced in dihydropyridine treated compared with verapamil treated patients. CONCLUSION: Effect of calcium antagonists on parameters of HRV is negative and this should be taken into consideration when antihypertensive treatment of patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes is selected.     

Use of calcium antagonists in ventricular dysfunction

Calcium antagonists are now widely used in a variety of cardiocirculatory disorders, many of which are associated with varying levels of depressed myocardial function. Thus, the hemodynamic effects of calcium antagonists in patients with normal as well as depressed ventricular function are clinically relevant. None of the 3 agents verapamil, nifedipine or diltiazem exerts significant negative inotropic effects in patients with relatively normal myocardial function, although increases in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure may occur with verapamil and possibly diltiazem. In a setting in which ischemia, hypertension or arrhythmias contribute to cardiac failure, all 3 agents may ameliorate myocardial decompensation if they reverse the precipitating causes. In patients with depressed myocardial function, the effects of diltiazem are not known; verapamil may depress myocardial function, especially if the ventricular filling pressure is increased. Nifedipine generally has little depressant action in this setting and usually improves cardiac function, especially if the sympathetic reflexes are intact. However, hemodynamic deterioration after nifedipine administration has been reported. Thus, the available data do not support the use of calcium antagonists as afterload-reducing agents in heart failure and suggest caution in the use of these agents in patients with impaired ventricular performance.     

Calcium antagonists in heart failure

Clinical experience with calcium antagonists in congestive heart failure has, to date, been mainly restricted to the use of nifedipine but there is either no or only a limited extent of information available on diltiazem and verapamil. In patients with acute and chronic congestive heart failure, single-dose administration of nifedipine was seen to lead to a decrease in systemic vascular resistance, left ventricular filling pressure and ventricular volumes as well as to an increase in stroke volume, ejection fraction and mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening. These favorable effects could not be detected in eight patients during a three-week treatment phase with 80 mg nifedipine daily: resting blood pressure, cardiac volumes, echocardiographically-dimensions and exercise tolerance were unchanged as compared with placebo. In patients with ischemic heart disease and impaired ventricular function, in addition to an improvement in systolic function, single-dose nifedipine administration led to favorable effects on diastolic function with a shift of the diastolic pressure-volume relationship downward and to the diastolic pressure-volume relationship downward and to the left. In patients with severe aortic regurgitation, the observed increase in effective cardiac output affected by nifedipine was primarily attributable to an increase in heart rate. In the presence of an initially-elevated systemic vascular resistance, the regurgitation fraction decreased. In pulmonary hypertension, favorable hemodynamic effects have been reported after acute administration of verapamil as well as diltiazem and nifedipine. In individual cases, promising results in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension have been reported during long-term therapy with nifedipine provided that a favorable initial response could be documented.     

Effect of cimetidine and ranitidine on cardiovascular drugs

A compilation of drug interactions between H2 antagonists and cardiovascular drugs is found in Table I. Cimetidine's potency, lipophilicity, and affinity for binding to the P-450 cytochrome system can probably be attributed to the drug interactions that have been identified with the H2 antagonists. The mechanism for most cimetidine drug interactions is inhibition of hepatic metabolism. There is conflicting evidence regarding significance of altered liver blood flow for both cimetidine and ranitidine and their influence on other agents. Cimetidine may increase propranolol's blood concentrations and potentiate beta blocking effects through inhibition of hepatic microsomal enzymes and possibly through reduction of hepatic blood flow. Ranitidine has no effect on propranolol. Cimetidine, when administered concurrently with metoprolol, could possibly cause an increase in plasma metoprolol concentrations or bioavailability through inhibition of hepatic P-450 metabolizing enzymes. No effect of cimetidine on metoprolol pharmacodynamics was evident. Ranitidine has no effect on metoprolol pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. Neither H2 antagonist altered the kinetics or physiologic effects of atenolol. Atenolol is the drug of choice in patients receiving H2 antagonists, since no interaction has been observed. Metoprolol could probably be used safely in most patients, as no change in pharmacodynamics has been evident. Concurrent administration of cimetidine and nifedipine may result in alterations in heart rate and blood pressure. The mechanism is inhibition of oxidative liver metabolism. Ranitidine has no effect on nifedipine. Studies are needed to investigate the interaction between the H2 antagonists and diltiazem or verapamil. Cimetidine, given concomitantly with lidocaine, may increase lidocaine concentrations and clinical symptoms of lidocaine toxicity. The mechanism involved is probably a reduction in oxidative drug metabolism or liver blood flow. Ranitidine has no significant effects on lidocaine pharmacokinetics. Cimetidine may increase quinidine levels and symptoms of quinidine toxicity. Additionally, enhanced arrhythmic effects may be observed. The interaction probably caused by an inhibition of hepatic drug metabolism of quinidine by cimetidine would be most significant in patients with liver disease and in the elderly. Ranitidine may enhance quinidine's arrhythmic effect. Cimetidine can possibly increase procainamide and NAPA serum concentrations, especially in the elderly and in patients with renal dysfunction, predisposing them to adverse side effects. The interaction is mediated by a reduction of tubular secretion of procainamide and NAPA.     

Role of calcium antagonists in systemic hypertension

Despite the physiologic rationale of their use in hypertension, traditional vasodilators such as hydralazine and minoxidil are often relegated to the second and, more often, to the third and fourth steps of step-care programs. Although they are powerful blood pressure-lowering agents, they cause tachycardia, excessive renin stimulation and sodium retention, and cannot be used as the only antihypertensive agent. The characteristics of the antihypertensive action of calcium antagonists make them suitable for monotherapy. Indeed, all calcium antagonists, while effectively lowering blood pressure through vasodilation, either do not affect heart rate (verapamil and its analogs) or cause a moderate and transient heart rate increase (dihydropyridine compounds). Dihydropyridines also possess a natriuretic effect, probably due to inhibition of tubular sodium transport. The natriuretic effect is evident during the first 2 days of administration, but a small negative sodium balance persists for at least 1 week. There is no increase in body weight or fluid volumes with long-term administration of calcium antagonists with a marked acute natriuretic response, such as dihydropyridines, and those antagonists with a very moderate immediate natriuretic response, such as verapamil. All calcium antagonists, therefore, appear capable of preventing the sodium and water retention that vasodilatation would otherwise entail. More liberal step-care guidelines are now possible to find the agent most suitable for the individual patient. In these guidelines, calcium antagonists, as well as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, are considered as possible first-choice agents along with diuretics and beta blockers.     

Treatment of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies with nifedipine

The calcium channel blocker, nifedipine, is an effective antihypertensive agent for the treatment of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies. It produces a prompt, safe, predictable, and consistent reduction in systemic arterial pressure with minimal adverse effects. The reduction in blood pressure is inversely correlated with the pretreatment blood pressure level. Various nonparenteral administration forms (oral, sublingual, buccal, and rectal) permit a versatile, noninvasive, cost-effective alternative to parenteral antihypertensive therapy and continuous hemodynamic monitoring. The overall efficacy in reaching goal blood pressure approaches 98% with a 10 to 20 mg dose of nifedipine. Hemodynamic changes are favorable, and there is rarely any associated morbidity (severe hypotension) or mortality. The role of nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies is promising, but further studies are needed to compare it to other approved emergency antihypertensive regimens.     

Calcium antagonists and stunned myocardium: Importance for clinicians?

Summary Experimental evidence indicates that calcium antagonists enhance the recovery of contractile function in canine myocardium stunned by a brief, 15-minute episode of transient coronary artery occlusion. In fact, both nifedipine and verapamil have been shown to improve systolic contraction, even when treatment was delayed, that is, when the agents were administered 30 minutes after reperfusion. The beneficial effects of delayed treatment were not a consequence of myocardial high-energy phosphate preservation. Furthermore, as low-dose intracoronary nifedipine enhanced the recovery of function in the absence of systemic hemodynamic or coronary vasodilatory effects, the improved function associated with delayed administration of calcium antagonists could not be attributed solely to afterload reduction or increased coronary blood flow. These data suggest that calcium-channel blockers exert a direct effect on the previously ischemic tissue, perhaps by subtle modulation of calcium transport or flux within the stunned myocytes. Although the precise mechanism of action of these agents remain unresolved, these intriguing experimental results raise the possibility that calcium antagonists may provide a clinically useful means of attenuating postischemic dysfunction of viable myocardium salvaged by thrombolysis, angioplasty, or cardiopulmonary bypass. The potential role of calcium-channel blockers in these clinical instances of stunned myocardium awaits further evaluation.     

Pharmacokinetics of calcium-entry blockers

Effective use of drugs in therapy depends not only on clinical acumen but also on the availability of relevant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. Such information assists in development of safe dosing regimens, prediction of abnormal handling of drugs in states of disease and disorder and anticipation of drug interactions. For the calcium-entry blocking agents now available in the United States (verapamil, nifedipine and diltiazem), these data appeared well after clinical patterns of use evolved. Nonetheless, their relevance continues to be demonstrated by the dependence of each agent on intact liver blood flow and function for normal rates of elimination; by the nonlinear kinetic characteristics for verapamil and diltiazem (and probably for nifedipine, as well) and the derivative implications for decreased dosing frequency requirements; and by observations now appearing on the relation between plasma drug levels and drug effects, both therapeutic and toxic. Such data are discussed herein, with emphasis on those aspects that impact on the clinical use of the calcium-entry antagonists.     

Pharmacokinetic overview of doxazosin

After both oral and intravenous administration, doxazosin is extensively metabolized, with only about 5% of the administered dose excreted unchanged in urine. For single doses, oral bioavailability has been calculated to be about 65%; terminal elimination half-life is approximately 10 to 12 hours. In later multiple-dose studies in which doxazosin concentrations were measured beyond 24 hours after administration, the terminal elimination half-life was 22 hours. Clearance of doxazosin, presumably in the liver, involves the production of mainly O-demethylated and C-hydroxylated metabolites, and is low in comparison with hepatic blood flow. Protein binding is reported to be 98.3% in humans. Relatively low clearance (1.0 to 2.0 ml/min/kg) in association with a moderate volume of distribution (1.0 to 1.9 liters/kg) is responsible for doxazosin's relatively long plasma half-life. There is no evidence to suggest that active metabolites contribute significantly to the pharmacologic activity of doxazosin; both hypotensive effect and alpha-adrenoceptor inhibitor activity have been directly related to the concentration of doxazosin in blood. During long-term treatment, no significant changes in the disposition of doxazosin have been reported; with dosages up to the maximum clinically used dosage of 16 mg daily, there is no evidence of dose-dependent pharmacokinetics. Studies in elderly patients have shown no major pharmacokinetic differences. Overall, these pharmacokinetic results suggest that doxazosin is suitable for once-daily administration in the long-term treatment of patients with essential hypertension.     

Amlodipine once a day in stable angina: Double-blind crossover comparison with placebo

Although calcium antagonists form a mainstay of therapy in patients with angina pectoris, the currently available agents have significant limitations. Nifedipine, diltiazem, and verapamil are all high-clearance agents with significant hepatic extraction and rapid clearance, leading to limited and shortlived bioavailability necessitating frequent daily administration. In contrast, amlodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, has a long half-life of 35–50 h (compared with 3 to 4 h elimination half-life of diltiazem, verapamil, and nifedipine).¹ After oral doses, the relative bioavailability of amlodipine is high (64%) and absorption is smooth, with peak plasma levels being achieved 6–12 h postdose.¹ Bioavailability is not affected by the consumption of food.² In common with other dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, amlodipine is eliminated mainly by metabolism.³ None of the metabolites of amlodipine has significant calcium antagonist effects in humans.³ In contrast to verapamil or diltiazem, amlodipine has no effect on sinus or atrioventricular node⁴ and little or no effect on the resting heart rate.⁵ Amlodipine does not have any appreciable negative inotropic effect with the relevant clinical dose.⁶ Other clinical studies have shown amlodipine to be effective when used once-daily in chronic stable angina and vasospastic angina.⁷ Comparative studies indicate that the antianginal efficacy of amlodipine is comparable to the beta blocker nadolol⁸ and the benzothiazepine calcium antagonist diltiazem.⁹ Amlodipine has also been found to provide improved antianginal effects when combined to treatment with beta blockers and/or long-acting nitrates.^{10, 11} Treatment with amlodipine either as monotherapy or combined with other antianginal therapy for up to 26 weeks shows that efficacy is maintained, with no evidence of tolerance.¹¹ We evaluated the antianginal efficacy and safety of amlodipine in a placebo-controlled multicenter randomized crossover study in patients with chronic stable angina.     

Differential therapy with calcium antagonists in pulmonary hypertension secondary to COPD. Hemodynamic effects of nifedipine, diltiazem, and verapamil

In 53 patients with COPD and precapillary pulmonary hypertension, we investigated the effect of three typical calcium antagonists on hemodynamics at rest and during bicycle ergometer exercise. In the responders, the decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance following nifedipine was 23 percent at rest (p less than 0.0005) and 35 percent during exercise (p less than 0.0005); following diltiazem, it was 10 percent at rest (p less than 0.05) and 23 percent during exercise (p less than 0.025); following verapamil, it was 22 percent at rest (p less than 0.005) and 11 percent during exercise (p less than 0.025). The cardiac index rose significantly at rest and under exercise only after the administration of nifedipine (+16 percent and +8 percent, resp). Nifedipine caused the most distinctive peripheral vasodilation. The heart rate increased slightly following nifedipine and decreased slightly following diltiazem and verapamil. After long-term therapy with nifedipine (13 +/- 5 months), the decrease in pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance was no longer significant. In our opinion, the different hemodynamic action profiles will have consequences for the differential therapy in patients with COPD and pulmonary hypertension.     

Usefulness of calcium antagonists for congestive heart failure

In patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) due to dilated cardiomyopathy, nifedipine, diltiazem and several of the newer calcium antagonists including nicardipine, nitrendipine, felodipine and PN 200-110 (isradipine) improve left ventricular function. Because of its relatively more pronounced negative inotropic and chronotropic actions, verapamil is generally not tolerated by patients with left ventricular failure. In addition, even relatively vascular-selective agents such as nifedipine can occasionally cause significant left ventricular depression, particularly if combined with beta-adrenergic blocking agents. Comparative studies using nitroprusside to cause an equivalent decrease in arterial pressure indicate that nifedipine acts predominantly on the arterial vasculature, and that a small but significant decrease in contractility occurs, apparently due to a direct myocardial action. Although diltiazem causes a depression in myocardial contractility in dogs with volume overload heart failure, limited data show no significant negative inotropic action in patients with heart failure. The negative inotropic effects, if any, of newer and possibly more vascular-selective agents are not yet known. Calcium antagonists appear to act predominantly on the limb and coronary vasculature, with relatively less effect on renal and hepatic vessels. In patients with CHF, nifedipine causes an increase in coronary blood flow and a decrease in the aorto-coronary sinus oxygen difference indicating an improvement in myocardial energetics. Although nifedipine causes an increase in cardiac index and decreases in systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise, the limited data available fail to show a short- or long-term increase in exercise capacity. Nifedipine causes an increase in plasma renin activity, possibly due to a direct action on the kidney.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)