Iron reduction and sustained response to interferon-alpha therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: results of an Italian multicenter randomized study

OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that iron depletion improves the response to interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis C. We aimed to evaluate whether iron reduction by phlebotomy before interferon improves the rate of virological sustained response in previously untreated noncirrhotic patients. METHODS: One hundred fourteen hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA positive patients with hepatic iron concentrations of > or =700 microg/g dry wt (men) and > or =500 microg/g dry wt (women), stratified according to HCV genotype and gamma-glutamyltransferase values, were randomly allocated to interferon alone (6 MU three times a week) (group A) or to phlebotomy until iron depletion followed by interferon (6 MU three times a week) (group B). After 4 months dosage was reduced to 3 MU three times a week for another 8 months. RESULTS: Virological sustained response was observed in 25 patients (22%), nine (15.8%, 95% CI = 7.5-27.9) of group A and 16 (28.1%, 95% CI = 17.0-41.6) of group B. At univariate analysis the variables associated with the response were HCV genotypes 2-3, normal gamma-glutamyltransferase, higher levels of baseline ALT, normal ALT values, and negativity for HCV-RNA at the 3rd month of therapy. At multivariate analysis, genotype and ALT levels at enrollment maintained their association with the response. A trend toward a better response to interferon was observed in patients who received phlebotomy (odds ratio = 2.32, 95% CI = 0.96-6.24, p = 0.082). Patients with hepatic iron concentration of < or = 1100 microg/g dry wt had a trend toward a higher rate of virological sustained response (p = 0.059) when submitted to treatment B. CONCLUSION: Iron removal by phlebotomy is able to improve the rate of response to interferon, especially in patients with lower hepatic iron deposits; it could be useful as adjuvant therapy to new therapeutic modalities.     

Iron reduction before and during interferon therapy of chronic hepatitis C: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

Patients with chronic hepatitis C and low serum and hepatic iron stores may have an improved response to interferon (IFN). We tested whether iron reduction before and during IFN therapy would lead to an improved sustained biochemical and virological response compared with IFN alone. Eighty-two previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C were randomized to either: group A IFN-alpha2b 3 MU 3 times per week for 6 months, or group B iron reduction before and during IFN-alpha2b 3 MU 3 times per week for 6 months. Group B patients had lower mean serum alanine transaminase (ALT) levels than group A patients during treatment and follow-up. Group B patients had significantly lower mean hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA levels at treatment weeks 4 and 12 (P <.05). Serum HCV RNA was undetectable at the end of treatment in 15 group B patients compared with 7 group A patients (P =.03); 7 group B patients and 3 group A patients had persistently undetectable serum HCV RNA 24 weeks after the end of therapy (P =.20). Paired pre- and posttreatment liver biopsies in 18 group B patients demonstrated significant improvements in 2 of the 3 inflammation scores of the Knodell histological activity index (P <. 05). No changes occurred in the paired biopsies from 15 group A patients. We conclude that iron reduction via therapeutic phlebotomy improves the end-of-treatment virological and histological response to short-term IFN therapy. Additional studies are needed to determine if iron reduction in combination with higher doses or longer duration of IFN may be of benefit.     

Meta-analysis of interferon randomized trials in the treatment of viral hepatitis C in naive patients: 1999 update

The aim of this study was to update our previous meta-analysis of interferon (IFN) in the treatment of hepatitis C and to analyse new factors, namely, HCV RNA end-point, patients with cirrhosis and patients with normal ALT. We use the Der Simonian and Laird method, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. Seventy-six randomized control trials (RCTs) in naive patients were found but we focused our analysis on 59 RCTs with chronic hepatitis C (26 vs. controls and 33 comparing different regimens) and on seven RCTs in acute hepatitis. Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) at 3 MU thrice weekly (TIW) for 12 months exhibited 39% of virological end-of-treatment response (ETR) and 17% of virological sustained response (SR), respectively, vs. 1% and 3% in untreated controls (all P < 0.001). There was a significant dose effect (in favour of 6 vs. 3 MU TIW): the virological SR at 6 months were 35% in the 6 MU group (95% CI: 24-47) and 16% in the 3 MU group (95% CI: 8-27) and were at 12 months 43% in the 6 MU group (95%CI: 31-56) and 25% in the 3 MU group (95% CI: 16-37). There was a significant duration effect (12 vs. 6 months) upon the virological SR rate both at 3 and 6 MU: 3 MU provided 14% of virological SR (95% CI: 11-19) in the 12 months group vs. 7% (95% CI: 5-11) in the 6 months group and 6 MU provided 22% (95% CI: 17-29) and 16% (95% CI: 11-22) virological SR in the 12 and 6 months groups, respectively. Cirrhotic treated patients had 17% of virological SR (95 CI: 9-24%; P < 0.001) vs. 0% in controls and provided a 20% reduction rate (95 CI: -2% to -37%, P=0.03) in hepatocellular carcinoma incidence. In acute hepatitis C, a 3-month treatment with IFN-alpha showed significant efficacy vs. controls upon the virological SR rate (32% vs. 4%, P < 0.001). In conclusion, we confirm the dose and duration effect of IFN in chronic hepatitis C, and the efficacy of IFN-alpha in the treatment of acute hepatitis and in cirrhotic patients.     

A randomized trial of amantadine and interferon versus interferon alone as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C

The aim of this study was to compare, in an open-label study, the efficacy and safety of a combination of interferon (IFN) and amantadine (AMA) with that of IFN alone in previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 200 patients were randomized to 6 MU of IFN-alpha2a 3 times per week, with 200 mg of AMA daily (n = 99) or to an identical dose of interferon alpha2a (n = 101). Patients were treated for 12 months and observed for 6 months' posttreatment. At the completion of treatment, 28.7% of patients in the monotherapy group and 45.5% in the combination group had a virologic response (P =.014). At 6 months' posttreatment, a sustained virologic response was observed in 16.8% (95% CI: 9-23) of patients with IFN alone versus 29.3% (95% CI: 19-37) of patients who were treated with combination therapy (P =.036). In each of the 2 treatments, genotype was the only predictive parameter for a sustained response. At the logistic regression analysis, therapy and genotype were the only 2 parameters with an independent predictive value. In the combination group, at examination of month 3, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA status had a 97.6% (95% CI: 93-102) positive predictive value and a 50% (95% CI: 37-63) negative predictive value for a sustained virologic clearance. A substantial proportion of na?ve patients with chronic hepatitis C have an end-of-treatment and end-of-follow-up virologic and biochemical response to a combination of IFN and AMA. This new treatment appears safe and well tolerated.     

Combination of interferon alfa-2a and amantadine does not improve the efficacy of interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A recent pilot study suggested that 18% of patients with hepatitis C viral infection achieved a sustained response to a 6-month course of 200 mg of oral amantadine alone with disappearance of serum hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid. We prospectively studied 30 naive patients with chronic hepatitis C viral infection for the possible role of amantadine in improving the efficiency of interferon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. METHODOLOGY: Patients were assigned into two groups on a double-blind and randomized controlled basis. Placebo group received 4.5 MU of interferon alfa-2a thrice weekly and oral placebo daily for 24 weeks. Amantadine group received a combination of the interferon and 200 mg of oral amantadine daily for 24 weeks. Patients were observed and tested for blood chemistry every week for the initial 4 weeks and every 2 weeks thereafter during the treatment until 24 weeks. After the end of treatment, patients were followed up at 4-week intervals for an additional 12 months. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, 5 (33.3%) patients responded to the combination therapy, and 7 (46.7%) patients responded to interferon therapy alone. Twelve months after cessation of the treatment, 3 (21.4%) patients had a sustained complete response to the combination therapy, and 3 (20.0%) patients had a sustained complete response to interferon alone (P = 0.64). CONCLUSION: Amantadine does not increase the efficacy of interferon in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.     

A randomized trial of induction doses of interferon alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine for treatment of nonresponder patients with chronic hepatitis C

Background Efficacy and safety of interferon induction therapy alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine were evaluated in chronic hepatitis C patients who were nonresponders to primary antiviral treatment. Methods The study was designed to have 225 HCV nonresponder patients, but at an interim analysis the response rate difference between groups was lower than expected and the enrollment was stopped when 75 patients had been randomized to receive interferon-α2a (group A, n = 26), interferon-α2a plus 15 mg/kg per day of ribavirin (group B, n = 24), or interferon-α2a plus ribavirin plus 200 mg/day of amantadine hydrochloride (group C, n = 25). Treatment duration was 48 weeks. The dose of interferon was 6 MU/day for 4 weeks followed by 3 MU/day for the remaining 44 weeks. Results On intention-to-treat, the sustained virological response at 24 weeks of follow-up was 11.5% in group A, 12.5% in group B, and 12% in group C. Therapy was discontinued because of adverse effects in three patients in group A (11.5%), three in group B (12.5%), and two in group C (8%). Conclusions Nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C may achieve a sustained virological response rate of approximately 12% if retreated with interferon induction treatment followed by administration of a daily dose. The addition of ribavirin or amantadine did not seem to improve the response rates.     

Effects of alpha interferon induction plus ribavirin with or without amantadine in the treatment of interferon non-responsive chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Fifty per cent of chronic hepatitis C patients are non-responders to interferon. At present, there are no recommended therapeutic options for non-responders. AIMS: The safety and long term effect of alpha interferon induction plus ribavirin with or without amantadine in the treatment of interferon non-responsive chronic hepatitis C was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 114 consecutive patients were randomly divided into three groups with a final 2:2:1 ratio: group A (44 patients) received interferon alfa 2b, 3 million units (MU), three times a week, and oral ribavirin (1000 mg/day); group B (46 patients) received interferon 3 MU daily for the first four weeks and subsequently 3 MU three times a week, and ribavirin as in regimen A; and group C (24 patients) received interferon and ribavirin as in regimen B, plus oral amantadine hydrochloride (200 mg/day). The duration of treatment was 12 months. RESULTS: The end of treatment response for groups A and B was 25% and 29%, respectively, and for group C, 68% (p<0.005). At the end of one year of follow up, a sustained response was observed for six (25%) patients in group C, one (2%) patient in group A, and two (4%) patients in group B (p<0.002). The triple regimen was well tolerated and did not increase the frequency or severity of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that for the treatment of interferon non-responder hepatitis C patients, the association of interferon-ribavirin has a negligible long term effect whereas a triple regimen including interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine can be an effective and safe treatment.     

Interferon versus ribavirin plus interferon in chronic hepatitis C previously resistant to interferon: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: More than 70% of patients with chronic hepatitis C are resistant to interferon therapy. Ribavirin, in association with interferon, has been demonstrated as effective, at a dose of 800-1200 mg/day, but the efficacy of a lower dose has not been established. METHODS: We assessed the effectiveness of the combination of 600 mg/day of ribavirin plus 3 MU of interferon over a period of 6 months, in a group of patients previously resistant to interferon. Sixty-two patients with chronic hepatitis C with serum and hepatic HCV RNA relapsers or non-responders to interferon, were randomly divided into two groups: group A received 3 MU of interferon alpha-2b, three times a week for 6 months; group B was given the same dose plus 600 mg per day of ribavirin for 6 months. Two patients from each group dropped from therapy. One patient from group A and two from group B withdrew from treatment because of adverse effects. RESULTS: Mean alanine aminotransferase levels were similar in both groups throughout the study. A sustained response was observed in 7% and 7.4% of groups A and B with short-term response in 39% and 59%, and no response in 54% and 34% from both groups respectively (non-significant). At 12 months, 4 and 7 patients from groups A and B respectively, cleared serum HCV RNA however, only one sustained responder from each group cleared HCV RNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. At 18 months, 3 patients remained serum HCV RNA negative. Adverse effects were similar. Only haemoglobin values were lower in group B in the first month of therapy (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the combination of 3 MU of interferon plus 600 mg of ribavirin is not effective in chronic hepatitis C resistant to interferon.     

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients who failed interferon monotherapy: effects of higher doses of interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. The Virginia Cooperative Hepatitis Treatment Group

OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of interferon-ribavirin combination therapy for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients who failed previous treatment with interferon monotherapy. METHODS: A total of 140 patients with well-documented chronic HCV who failed to achieve a virological (if HCV-RNA was assessed) or biochemical response (if HCV-RNA was not assessed) to interferon monotherapy, 3 mU three times weekly (TIW) for 3-18 months, were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. Group A patients were treated with 5 mU interferon TIW for 6 months. Ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) was added in those patients HCV-RNA positive at month 3. Group B patients were treated with 3 mU interferon TIW plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 6 months. The dose of interferon was increased to 5 mU TIW in those patients HCV-RNA positive at month 3. Group C patients were treated with 5 mU interferon TIW plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 6 months. Serum ALT and HCV-RNA were monitored during and after treatment for a total of 15 months. RESULTS: Seventeen percent of patients in group A became HCV-RNA negative by treatment month 3. Adding ribavirin resulted in one additional patient becoming HCV-RNA negative. However, none of the patients in this group achieved sustained virological response. Twenty-six percent of patients in group B became HCV-RNA negative by treatment month 3. Increasing the dose of interferon from 3 to 5 mU TIW increased virological response to 30%. However, sustained virological response was observed in only 14%. Thirty percent of patients in group C became HCV-RNA negative, but sustained virological response was observed in only 12%. Sustained virological response was found to be significantly greater in patients with a nontype I HCV genotype (p < 0.002) and in patients who had a decline in HCV-RNA titer to a value < 100,000 copies/ml during their previous course of interferon monotherapy (p < 0.0001). None of the 12 sustained responders were African Americans (p < 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Retreatment of nonresponders with interferon-ribavirin combination therapy results in limited benefit; only 13% of patients achieved sustained virological response. Response was extremely poor in African Americans and those with HCV genotype 1.     

Interferon alfa2a induction therapy in combination with ribavirin and amantadine for the treatment of naive patients with chronic HCV infection

Summary.  Pilot studies have suggested that the addition of amantadine to interferon (IFN) is effective against hepatitis C virus (HCV). Furthermore, IFN induction therapy seems to improve virological response rates. In this open, randomized, multicentre trial we compared safety and efficacy of a triple therapy comprising IFN α 2a, ribavirin and amantadine using high induction doses (6 MU IFN α daily for the first 6 weeks) against a therapy with standard IFN α dosages over the entire treatment period plus amantadine and ribavirin. A total of 158 naive patients with chronic HCV infection were randomized 1:1. Group A ( n  = 81): induction therapy with 6 MU IFN α daily for 6 weeks, followed by 6 MU three times a week (tiw) for 18 weeks and then 3 MU tiw until week 48. Group B ( n  = 77): standard therapy with 6 MU IFN α tiw for 24 weeks, followed by 3 MU until week 48. All patients received oral ribavirin (10 mg/kg/day) and amantadine (200 mg/day). The triple therapy was safe and well tolerated. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to biochemical response rates. Groups A and B did not differ in virological response rates at the end of treatment (33% vs 35%) or at the end of the 6 month follow up period (37% vs 39%). We could not detect favourable effects on sustained virological response rates using induction therapy, in either genotype 1 or non-1 infected patients. In summary, induction therapy with 6 MU IFN α daily did not result in increased overall response rates compared with standard IFN α dosages of 6 MU tiw.     

Evaluation of amantadine in chronic hepatitis C: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The benefit of amantadine combination therapy, either with interferon (IFN) alone (double therapy) or with ribavirin and IFN (triple therapy) is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed the effect of amantadine on the end-of-treatment virological response and the sustained response using meta-analysis of 31 randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: Overall analysis revealed a significant effect of amantadine. Triple therapy was the best regimen for improving the sustained response (mean difference: 8.4%, 95% CI: 2.4-13.8%, P=0.002). In subgroup analysis, amantadine did not have a significant effect upon naive patients or relapsers. In non-responders, combination therapy with amantadine was associated with a significant effect on the sustained response (mean difference: 8.3%, 95% CI: 1.9-14.6%, P=0.01). In sensitivity analysis, double therapy did not improve virological responses. Conversely, triple therapy tended to improve the end-of-treatment virological response and was associated with a significant effect upon the sustained response (mean difference: 12.7%, 95% CI: 3.8-21.6%, P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with amantadine is of no effect upon naive patients or relapsers. In non-responders, triple therapy with amantadine improved the sustained response. New randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this meta-analysis.     

Pilot dose-finding trial on interferon alpha in combination with ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients not responding to interferon alone

BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of combination therapy with standard interferon alpha doses and ribavirin is far from being demonstrated in patients with hepatitis C non responders to interferon alpha monotherapy. Recent kinetic studies revealed that these doses may be suboptimal. AIMS: To find the criteria for optimisation of the interferon dose, to be used in combination with ribavirin in patients with hepatitis C non responders to interferon alpha monotherapy. PATIENTS: Sixty-three patients enrolled in a pilot controlled trial were treated for 6 months with ribavirin ([1000-1200 mg daily) and were randomised to concurrently receive interferon alpha 2b for 6 months at: 3 Million Units thrice weekly [group A (21 patients)], 5 MU thrice weekly [group B (21 patients)] and 5 million units daily [group C (21 patients)]. RESULTS: A sustained virological response was observed in: 1 patient from group A (5%), 2 patients from group B (9%) and 8 patients from group C (38%; p=0.02 vs group A; p=0.03 vs group B). Side-effects were not significantly different between the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis showed that infection by hepatitis C virus genotypes 2 or 3 and interferon alpha dosage of 5 million units daily were independent predictors of sustained response. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that higher interferon doses administered daily in combination with ribavirin could be more effective in those patients with hepatitis C who had not responded to interferon alone.     

Daily or three times per week interferon alpha-2b in combination with ribavirin or interferon alone for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to previous interferon alone

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We compared the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of daily interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin with those of interferon alpha-2b three times per week alone or in combination with ribavirin in non-responder patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.METHODS: A total of 376 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon alpha-2b (6 MU three times per week for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B), or daily interferon alpha-2b (3 MU per day for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (group C).RESULTS: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in 11.7, 24.0, and 37.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Sustained virological response was more frequent in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (20.9%) or daily interferon (26.0%) than in patients who received interferon alone (5.8%) (P<0.001). The predictive HCV parameters for sustained response were a low viral load on day 7 and a negative HCV RNA on week 12.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C, virological response with daily interferon and ribavirin, compared to interferon monotherapy, was significantly improved during treatment, although sustained virological response was similar for both combination therapies with ribavirin and three times a week or daily interferon.     

Viral and Host Factors in Determining Response of Relapsers with Chronic Hepatitis C to Retreatment with Interferon

In chronic hepatitis C the rate of relapse afteran end-of-treatment response to interferon may exceed50%. The usefulness of retreatment of relapsers withinterferon in obtaining a complete sustained response and the role of clinical, virological andimmunological features in determining long-term efficacyof retreatment are unclear. We aimed to assess theefficacy of interferon retreatment in obtaining acomplete sustained response, to evaluate whetherincreasing the dose may enhance responsiveness, and toidentify possible predictors of sustained response. Weenrolled 42 patients with biopsy-proven chronichepatitis C without cirrhosis who had previouslyresponded to a six-month course ofInterferon-_2b (total dose: group A, 22patients, 234 MU; group B, 20 patients, 468 MU) and thenrelapsed. All, except one, were HCV-RNA negative at the end of first cycle ofinterferon; most (31/42, 74%) were infected by HCV 1b.Subjects were randomly allocated to receive anothercycle of interferon either at the original dose (group A₁: 234 MU, 11 patients; groupB 468 MU, 10 patient) or twice the original dose (groupA₂: 468 MU, 11 patients; group B : 936 MU, 10patients). At the end of the second cycle of interferon,24 subjects (57%) had normal ALT and were HCV-RNAnegative, and 16 (39%) had normal ALT, but were HCV-RNApositive. A complete sustained response was obtained ineight patients (19%), at a similar rate in all treatment groups. Complete sustainedresponders were different from the other patients interms of age (35.9 ± 10.4 vs 44.1 ± 8.8,P = 0.027), rate of infection with non-1b HCV (6/8 vs5/34, P = 0.0005), serum HCV-RNA (74,016 vs 321,428median copies/ml, P = 0.037) and serum levels of90K/MAC-2 BP (5.76 ± 3.01 vs 10.25 ± 5.16units/ml, P = 0.02), an N-glycoprotein implicated incellular defense functions. Multivariate logistic analysisvalidated age and HCV genotype as independent predictorsof CSR. Among noncirrhotic relapsers who received atotal interferon dose 234 MU in the first cycle,retreatment usually induced end-of-treatment response. Acomplete sustained response was obtained in only one ofevery five subjects. Increasing the dose of interferonabove that of the first cycle did not enhance the rate of sustained response. In conclusionwe might assert that young subjects infected by non-1bHCV and with low levels of HCV-RNA and of 90K/MAC-2 BPare the best candidates for retreatment.     

Interferon versus ribavirin plus interferon in chronic hepatitis C previously resistant to interferon: a randomized trial

Abstract: Background: More than 70% of patients with chronic hepatitis C are resistant to interferon therapy. Ribavirin, in association with interferon, has been demonstrated as effective, at a dose of 800–1200 mg/day, but the efficacy of a lower dose has not been established. Methods: We assessed the effectiveness of the combination of 600mg/day of ribavirin plus 3 MU of interferon over a period of 6 months, in a group of patients previously resistant to interferon. Sixty-two patients with chronic hepatitis C with serum and hepatic HCV RNA relapsers or non-responders to interferon, were randomly divided into two groups: group A received 3 MU of interferon alpha-2b, three times a week for 6 months; group B was given the same dose plus 600 mg per day of ribavirin for 6 months. Two patients from each group dropped from therapy. One patient from group A and two from group B withdrew from treatment because of adverse effects. Results: Mean alanine aminotransferase levels were similar in both groups throughout the study. A sustained response was observed in 7% and 7.4% of groups A and B with short-term response in 39% and 59%, and no response in 54% and 34% from both groups respectively (nonsignificant). At 12 months, 4 and 7 patients from groups A and B respectively, cleared serum HCV RNA however, only one sustained responder from each group cleared HCV RNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. At 18 months, 3 patients remained serum HCV RNA negative. Adverse effects were similar. Only haemoglobin values were lower in group B in the first month of therapy (p<0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, the combination of 3 MU of interferon plus 600 mg of ribavirin is not effective in chronic hepatitis C resistant to interferon.     

Interferon and ribavirin versus interferon and amantadine in interferon nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the potential efficacy and safety of a combination of interferon and ribavirin with that of interferon and amantadine in patients who had previously failed to respond to interferon monotherapy. METHODS: A total of 29 patients were randomized to 3 million units of alpha-interferon three times weekly with 1000 mg of ribavirin daily (group A, n = 14) or an identical dose of alpha-interferon and amantadine hydrochloride given in a dose of 200 mg daily (group B, n = 15). Patients were treated for 24 wk and observed for 24 wk posttreatment. RESULTS: The treatment groups were evenly matched with respect to gender, frequency of genotype 1, presence of fibrosis, as well as baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HCV RNA levels. At the end of therapy, five of 14 or 36% of patients in group A versus 0 of 15 in group B had both normal serum ALT and nondetectable HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (p = 0.017). A complete response was sustained, however, in only two of 13 patients (15%) in group A who completed 24 wk of observation posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of interferon nonresponders have an end-of-treatment biochemical and virological response to a combination of interferon and ribavirin, and sustained responses are possible. The addition of amantadine to interferon, in contrast, does not seem to enhance the antiviral effectiveness of interferon in patients who have previously failed to respond.     

A pilot study of recombinant interferon beta-1a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C

AIMS: Interferon alpha monotherapy induces a sustained response in less than 20% of patients treated for chronic hepatitis C. Interferon beta represents a potential therapeutic alternative for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of recombinant interferon beta-la administered subcutaneously. METHODS: Twenty-one drug-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated with recombinant interferon beta-la administered, subcutaneously, for 24 weeks using two different regimens: 9 MU, three times per week (n=11) and 12 MU, three times per week (n=10). RESULTS: At the end of the treatment period, nine (43%) patients had a biochemical and virological response (i.e. normal ALT and absence of hepatitis C virus RNA by PCR). Four of these patients were in the 9 MU group and five in the 12 MU group. A biochemical and virological sustained response occurred in four (19%) patients, all in the 9 MU dose group. The 4 patients with a sustained response maintained their response during a follow-up period of 33 to 58 months. Side effects were mild and 19 (90%) patients completed the treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study indicate that interferon beta-la administered subcutaneously is an effective therapy for some patients with chronic hepatitis C, and suggest that interferon beta-1a deserves further evaluations in larger trials especially in combination with ribavirin.     

Twice-a-day versus once-a-day interferon-beta therapy in chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The intravenous administration of interferon-beta may be effective for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, as is intramuscular interferon-beta. We compared the efficacy and safety of twice-a-day versus once-a-day of natural interferon-beta for the initial treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODOLOGY: Forty-nine patients with chronic hepatitis C, with less than 5 Meq/mL serum hepatitis C virus-RNA, were randomly assigned into one of the two treatment groups A and B and treated with natural interferon-beta following two different protocols. Twenty-two patients were treated with twice-a-day interferon-beta (3 MU) for 3 weeks followed by once-a-day interferon-beta (6 MU) for 5 weeks (group A), and 20 patients were treated with once-a-day interferon-beta (6 MU) for 8 weeks (group B). Seven patients did not complete the treatment protocol. Efficacy was assessed by measuring the serum levels of hepatitis C virus-RNA and aminotransferase. RESULTS: The rate of sustained virological response was significantly higher in group A (14 of 22 patients, 63.6%) than in group B (6 of 20 patients, 30.0%) (P < 0.05). Among patients with hepatitis C virus-RNA level less than 1 Meq/mL, the sustained virological response rate was significantly higher in group A (13 of 15 patients, 86.7%) than in group B (5 of 12 patients, 41.7%) (P < 0.05). However, the sustained virological response rate in patients with hepatitis C virus levels more than 1 Meq/mL was not significantly different between group A (1 of 7 patients, 14.3%) and group B (1 of 8 patients, 12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Twice-a-day interferon-beta therapy is more effective than once-a-day interferon-beta for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients with hepatitis C virus-RNA levels less than 1 Meq/mL.     

Interferon and ursodeoxycholic acid combined therapy in chronic viral C hepatitis: controlled randomized trial in 203 patients

AIMS: This prospective randomized trial was carried out in order to determine whether the long-term administration of ursodeoxycholic acid after discontinuation of interferon had any beneficial effect on the clinical course of hepatitis C virus infection. METHODS: Enrolled in the study were 203 patients with chronic active hepatitis C. They were all given: interferon alpha-2a (3 MU subcutaneously thrice a week) and ursodeoxycholic acid (10 mg/kg/day) for 9 months. At month 9, biochemical responders only were randomized into ursodeoxycholic acid treatment or placebo for 12 additional months (double blind study). RESULTS: At the end of interferon therapy, 71 patients (37%) were virological responders and 107 (56%) patients were biochemical responders and were randomized: 54 into the ursodeoxycholic acid group and 53 into the placebo group. Sustained response was evaluated 12 months after withdrawal of interferon. Sustained biochemical and virological responses were, respectively, 30% and 22% in the ursodeoxycholic acid group and 46% and 32% in the placebo group, which did not significantly differ. Histological evolution of fibrosis and necrotic inflammatory activity were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Continuation of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy after withdrawal of interferon in patients with end-of-treatment response did not result in any significant improvement either in the maintenance of response to interferon or in liver histology.