Differential effects of olanzapine at dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in dopamine depleted animals

We investigated the degree of striatal dopamine-2 (D₂) receptor occupancy in six schizophrenic patients receiving clinically effective antipsychotic treatment with olanzapine 10–25 mg/day in comparison to patients treated with clozapine 300–600 mg/day (n = 6) or haloperidol 5–20 mg/day (n = 10). ¹²³I Iodobenzamide (IBZM) and single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) were used for the visualization of striatal D₂ receptors. For the quantification of striatal D₂ receptor occupancy, striatal IBZM binding in patients treated with antipsychotics was compared to that in untreated healthy controls (n = 8) reported earlier. Olanzapine led to a mean striatal D₂ receptor occupancy rate of 75% (range 63–85). Haloperidol-treated patients showed dose-dependently (Pearson r = 0.64; P < 0.05) a significantly higher (P < 0.05) mean occupancy rate of 84% (range 67–94). During clozapine treatment, the mean D₂ receptor occupancy of 33% (range < 20–49) was significantly lower than with olanzapine (P < 0.005). The higher striatal D₂ receptor occupancy of haloperidol was correlated with the incidence and severity of extrapyramidal motor side-effects (EPS). No clinical relevant EPS occurred during treatment with olanzapine or clozapine. There was no correlation between the degree of striatal D₂ receptor occupancy and clinical improvement. Received: 18 March 1998/Final version: 10 June 1998     

Potentiation of prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex in rats: pharmacological evaluation of the procedure as a model for detecting antipsychotic activity

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex – whereby presentation of a weak prepulse preceding a startling pulse diminishes the amplitude of the startle reflex – is disrupted by dopamine (DA) agonists; this disruption can be reversed by antipsychotics. There are also some indications in the literature that a few antipsychotics (most notably clozapine and haloperidol) may, on their own, have effects opposite to those of DA agonists, i.e. may enhance PPI. In order to explore these antipsychotic-induced potentiations of PPI more thoroughly, we assessed, in Sprague-Dawley rats, the effects of IP administration of various clinically effective antipsychotics in a PPI procedure with levels of PPI (ranging from 5 to about 40%) low enough to facilitate detection of PPI-potentiating effects of drugs. Both clozapine (5–20 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.25–1 mg/kg) robustly and dose-dependently potentiated PPI. A similar effect was not seen with risperidone (0.1–1 mg/kg) or with the three substituted benzamides amisulpride (10–60 mg/kg), raclopride (0.1–3 mg/kg) and remoxipride (1–10 mg/kg). As risperidone is known to have prominent 5-HT₂ antagonistic activity, these results do not indicate a role for 5-HT₂ receptors in the clozapine and haloperidol PPI-enhancing effects. The absence of effects with the benzamides and with risperidone, at doses with known anti-dopaminergic activity, suggests that DA antagonist activity is not involved. The demonstration that prazosin (3–20 mg/kg), a non-antipsychotic with α₁ adrenoceptor antagonistic properties, dose-dependently potentiated PPI indicates that α₁ receptors might mediate the clozapine and haloperidol PPI-enhancing activity. Additionally, the finding that diazepam (1–10 mg/kg) did not enhance, but on the contrary reduced PPI, argues against a sedation- or general depressant-mediated effect of clozapine, haloperidol and prazosin. The negative results with four clinically active antipsychotics (risperidone and the benzamides), and the positive result with the non-antipsychotic prazosin, indicate that this PPI-enhancing procedure has poor predictive validity as a screening tool for potential antipsychotics. Received: 14 November 1996/Final version: 6 February 1997     

Olanzapine increases in vivo dopamine and norepinephrine release in rat prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens and striatum

The in vivo effects of olanzapine on the extracellular monoamine levels in rat prefrontal cortex (Pfc), nucleus accumbens (Acb) and striatum (Cpu) were investigated by means of microdialysis. Sequential doses of olanzapine at 0.5, 3 and 10 mg/kg (SC) dose-dependently increased the extracellular dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) levels in all three brain areas. The increases appeared 30 min after olanzapine administration, reached peaks around 60–90 min and lasted for at least 2 h. The highest DA increases in the Acb and Cpu were induced by olanzapine at 3 mg/kg but at 10 mg/kg in the Pfc. The peak DA increase in the Pfc (421% ± 46 of the baseline) was significantly larger than those in the Acb (287% ± 24) and Cpu (278% ± 28). Similarly, the highest NE increase in the Pfc (414%±40) induced by 10 mg/kg olanzapine was larger than those in the Acb (233% ± 39) and Cpu (223% ± 24). The DA and NE increases in the Pfc induced by olanzapine at 3 and 10 mg/kg (SC) were slightly larger than those induced by clozapine at the same doses. In contrast, haloperidol (0.5 and 2 mg/kg, SC) did not change Pfc DA and NE levels. Extracellular levels of a DA metabolite, DOPAC, and tissue concentrations of a released DA metabolite, 3-methoxytyramine, were also increased by olanzapine, consistent with enhanced DA release. However, olanzapine at the three sequential doses did not alter the extracellular levels of either 5-HT or its metabolite, 5-HIAA, in any of the three brain areas. In conclusion, the present studies demonstrate that in the case of sequential dosing olanzapine more effectively enhances DA and NE release in the Pfc than in the subcortical areas, which may have an impact on its atypical antipsychotic actions. Received: 7 May 1997/Final version: 15 September 1997     

Dissociation of haloperidol, clozapine, and olanzapine effects on electrical activity of mesocortical dopamine neurons and dopamine release in the prefrontal cortex.

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of the typical antipsychotic haloperidol and the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine on both extracellular dopamine (DA) levels in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) as well as electrical activity of mesoprefrontal DA (mPFC-DA) neurons. Extracellular single unit recordings and microdialysis experiments were carried out in different groups of chloral hydrate anesthetised rats under identical experimental conditions. Intravenous administration of haloperidol, clozapine, and olanzapine increased the firing rate and burst activity of antidromically-identified mPFC-DA neurons; maximal increase in firing rate of approximately 140, 155, and 70 %, was produced by haloperidol, clozapine, and olanzapine at doses of 0.2, 2.5, and 1 mg/kg, i.v., respectively. Intravenous administration of the same doses increased extracellular DA levels in mPFC by 20%, 190%, and 70%, respectively. Moreover, while haloperidol and olanzapine increased extracellular levels of the deaminated DA metabolite DOPAC, by 60% and 40%, respectively, clozapine was totally ineffective. The D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 modified neither DA output nor neuronal firing. To determine whether the effect of the three antipsychotics on DA release might depend on a direct action on the mPFC, rats were perfused locally via inverse dialysis in the mPFC at concentrations ranging from 10(-6) to 10(-4)M. While clozapine and olanzapine increased extracellular DA concentrations by up to 400% of basal level, haloperidol was totally ineffective. The results obtained from this study indicate that the rank potency of the three antipsychotics in stimulating the firing rate of DA neurons projecting to mPFC, correlates with their affinity for D2 receptors and doses used clinically. On the other hand, their stimulating effect on DA release does not correlate with their effect on neuronal firing but depends on a direct action on the mPFC.     

Differential actions of classical and atypical antipsychotic drugs on spontaneous neuronal activity in the amygdaloid complex

Classical antipsychotic drugs such as haloperidol produce akinesia and catalepsy, whereas clozapine and related atypical antipsychotics fail to elicit these behaviors even at relatively high doses. Despite these behavioral differences, a cataleptic dose of haloperidol (2.0 mg/kg) produces changes in neuronal activity in the neostriatum and nucleus accumbens comparable to those produced by a non-cataleptic dose of clozapine (20.0 mg/kg). To further elucidate the brain mechanisms underlying the differential behavioral response to these drugs, an electrophysiological analysis was extended to neurons in the rat amygdaloid complex. Whereas an intraperitoneal injection of 2.0 mg/kg haloperidol generally failed to alter the firing rate of amygdaloid neurons, 20.0 mg/kg clozapine typically produced a prolonged increase in activity. Similarly, clozapine, but not haloperidol, reversed the depression of firing rate produced by 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine. The results suggest that neurons in the amygdaloid complex are more responsive to antipsychotic drugs devoid of extrapyramidal side effects than to antipsychotics which elicit parkinsonian-like motor dysfunctions.     

IBZM SPECT imaging of striatal dopamine-2 receptors in psychotic patients treated with the novel antipsychotic substance quetiapine in comparison to clozapine and haloperidol

We investigated the striatal dopamine-2 (D₂) receptor occupancy caused by different antipsychotic substances in 18 psychotic patients (16 with schizophrenic and two with schizoaffective disorder according to DSM-IV) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using ¹²³I-iodobenzamide (IBZM) as tracer substance. Four patients were treated with the novel antipsychotic compound quetiapine (300–700 mg/day), six with clozapine (300–600 mg/ day) and eight with haloperidol (10–20 mg/day). They were compared with eight healthy controls. Measurement of S/F ratios and consecutive calculation of D₂ receptor occupancy revealed a significantly lower striatal D₂ occupancy rate with quetiapine and clozapine in comparison to haloperidol. In correspondence with the low striatal D₂ receptor occupancy rates and again in contrast to the haloperidol treatment group, there were no extrapyramidal motor side-effects (EPS) in the quetiapine and clozapine treatment groups. Therefore, the reported data support the position that quetiapine can be considered to be an atypical antipsychotic substance due to its relatively weak striatal D₂ receptor blocking property and therefore its low propensity to induce EPS. Received: 12 August 1996/Final version: 11 May 1997     

Clozapine discrimination with a low training dose distinguishes atypical from typical antipsychotic drugs in rats

Rationale: Previous drug discrimination studies with clozapine have not reliably distinguished between atypical and typical antipsychotics. Objectives: The present study was conducted to determine whether low-dose clozapine drug discrimination could distinguish atypical from typical antipsychotics. Methods: Rats were trained to discriminate 1.25 mg/kg clozapine from vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure. Results: Generalization testing revealed full substitution with the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine (90.3% maximum generalization), sertindole (99.8%), and risperidone (87.1%) and partial substitution for quetiapine (seroquel, 66.4%) and the typical antipsychotics haloperidol (56.8%) and thioridazine (74.3%). Remoxipride (23.1%) and the typical antipsychotics chlorpromazine (27.9%) and fluphenazine (29.5%) did not reliably substitute for clozapine. Conclusions: In contrast to previous clozapine drug discrimination studies with higher training doses, the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine, sertindole, and risperidone reliably substituted for clozapine while typical antipsychotics did not. These results suggest that low-dose clozapine drug discrimination may be a more sensitive assay for distinguishing atypical from typical antipsychotic drugs. Received: 3 August 1999 / Final version: 9 December 1999     

Discriminative-stimulus effects of clozapine in squirrel monkeys: comparison with conventional and novel antipsychotic drugs

 The effects of conventional and novel atypical antipsychotic drugs were compared to clozapine in squirrel monkeys that discriminated IM injections of clozapine (1.0 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure. Clozapine (0.03–3.0 mg/kg) produced dose-related increases in responding on the clozapine-associated lever with full substitution at the training dose in all monkeys. Dose-related increases in responding on the clozapine-associated lever and full substitution also were observed with structural analogues of clozapine including perlapine and fluperlapine (0.1–3.0 mg/kg), seroquel (0.1–5.6 mg/kg), and JL 5, JL 8 and JL 18 (0.1–3.0 mg/kg). Other clozapine analogues, including olanzapine, amoxapine, loxapine and clothiapine, and conventional antipsychotic drugs, including phenothiazines such as chlorpromazine and thioridazine, produced some clozapine-associated responding up to the highest doses that could be studied, but did not substitute for clozapine. Olanzapine did produce full clozapine-lever responding following pretreatment with the dopamine D₂-receptor agonist (+)-PHNO (0.003–0.01 mg/kg). Putatively atypical antipsychotics that are structurally unrelated to clozapine including risperidone (0.003–0.1 mg/kg), sertindole (0.03–1.0 mg/kg) and remoxipride (0.1–5.6 mg/kg) similarly failed to substitute for clozapine up to the highest doses. The present results indicate that some, but not all, structural analogs of clozapine have clozapine-like discriminative-stimulus effects and that novel antipsychotic drugs which purportedly have clozapine-like clinical efficacy may not produce its interoceptive stimulus effects. Received: 2 November 1996 / Final version: 13 January 1997     

Effects of clozapine,olanzapine and haloperidol on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour in the rat

Rationale. Antipsychotic drugs, particularly the newer atypical compounds, have been associated with rapid weight gain in a clinical setting. However, there are few reported animal models producing reliable hyperphagia correlating with the human weight gain liability of these drugs. Objective. To compare the effects of the classic neuroleptic haloperidol with the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour in rats. Methods. Male hooded Lister rats drank a palatable high-calorie fat emulsion (10% Intralipid) during 30-min test sessions and microstructural analyses were made following administration of each drug over a range of doses. Results. Clozapine (0.3 mg/kg) and olanzapine (0.1, 0.3, 1 mg/kg) significantly increased intake, whilst haloperidol (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/kg) significantly decreased drinking. No significant changes in the latency to the first lick were observed following any of the drugs tested. Median interlick intervals showed small, dose-related increases after clozapine (3.0 mg/kg), olanzapine (0.3, 1.0 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.1, 0.2 mg/kg). Olanzapine (1.0 mg/kg) significantly elevated the number of clusters of licking (bouts of licking separated by pauses greater than 500 ms), whilst clozapine and haloperidol did not. Mean cluster size (licks per cluster) was not affected by clozapine or olanzapine, but haloperidol (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/kg) produced marked, significant decreases in cluster size. Conclusions. Clozapine and olanzapine increased fat intake whereas haloperidol did not, and this resembles the greater weight gain liability of atypical antipsychotics in humans. A delay or reduction of the post-ingestive satiety signal combined with preserved palatability appears to be the mechanism responsible for fat hyperphagia in rats treated with clozapine and olanzapine. Conversely, haloperidol leaves satiety unaffected but reduces the palatability of the fat emulsion resulting in reduced intake. Electronic Publication     

Regulation of ionotropic glutamate receptors following subchronic and chronic treatment with typical and atypical antipsychotics

Quantitative in vitro receptor autoradiography was used to examine changes in three ionotropic glutamate receptor subtypes using ³H-MK801 (NMDA-R antagonist), ³H-CNQX (AMPA-R antagonist) and ³H-kainic acid (kainate-R agonist) following subchronic (28 days) and chronic (8 months) treatment of rats with a typical antipsychotic, haloperidol (1.5 mg/kg per day), atypical antipsychotic, clozapine (25 mg/kg per day), the dopamine D₂/D₃ receptor antagonist, raclopride (10 mg/kg per day), and the dopamine D1 (D₁/D₅) receptor antagonist SCH23390 (0.5 mg/kg per day). Subchronic and chronic drug treatments did not significantly alter ³H-CNQX or ³H-kainate binding in any of brain regions examined. Subchronic SCH23390 treatment elevated ³H-MK801 binding in the hippocampal formation with significant increases in the CA₁ and dentate gyrus, suggesting a specific role for dopamine D1 receptors in the regulation of hippocampal NMDA receptor function. Subchronic, but not chronic, haloperidol and clozapine treatment significantly reduced ³H-MK801 binding in the medial prefrontal cortex. This suggests that typical and atypical antipsychotics may exert some of their clinical effects by affecting NMDA receptors in the medial prefrontal cortex. Both subchronic and chronic clozapine treatment decreased ³H-MK801 binding in the caudate putamen. The minimal extrapyramidal side effects produced by clozapine may result, in part, from the reduction in NMDA receptor binding in the caudate putamen. Received: 29 February 1996 /Final version: 15 July 1996     

Olanzapine,a novel atypical antipsychotic,reversesd-amphetamine-induced inhibition of midbrain dopamine cells

This study compared the ability of the novel atypical antipsychotic olanzapine with that of clozapine to reverse thed-amphetamine-induced inhibition of substantia nigra (A9) and ventral tegmental area (A10) dopamine (DA) cells. Extracellular single-unit recordings were made from A9 and A10 DA cells in anesthetized rats. When administered alone, neither olanzapine nor clozapine altered the firing rate of A9 or A10 DA cells. Administration ofd-amphetamine (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg, IV, decreased the firing rate of A9 and A10 DA cells. Olanzapine completely reversed the inhibitory effects ofd-amphetamine on A10 DA cells (ED₁₀₀=0.18 mg/kg, IV) and on A9 DA cells (ED₁₀₀=1.0 mg/mg, IV). Clozapine completely reversed the inhibitory effects ofd-amphetamine on A10 DA cells (ED₁₀₀=3.8 mg/kg, IV), but only partially reversed the effects ofd-amphetamine on A9 DA cells at the highest dose tested (8.0 mg/kg, IV). Thus, olanzapine, like clozapine, was more potent in reversing the effects ofd-amphetamine on A10 than A9 DA cells. In addition, olanzapine was more potent than clozapine in the reversal ofd-amphetamine effects on A9 and A10 DA cells. These results indicate that olanzapine and clozapine have similar effects on DA unit activity and predict that olanzapine should have an atypical antipsychotic profile in man.     

Discriminative stimulus control with olanzapine: generalization to the atypical antipsychotic clozapine

 The present study was conducted to determine if the putative atypical antipsychotic olanzapine could be established as a discriminative stimulus in rats. Seven rats were successfully trained to discriminate olanzapine (0.5 mg/kg, IP) from vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure (mean number of acquisition sessions=39.3). Generalization testing with olanzapine (0.0625–2.0 mg/kg) yielded an ED₅₀ of 0.170 mg/kg (95% confidence interval=0.118–0.246 mg/kg). The atypical antipsychotic clozapine (0.156–10.0 mg/kg) fully substituted for olanzapine in all rats at the 2.5 mg/kg dose with 99.0% drug-lever responding, in six rats at the 0.625 mg/kg dose, and in five rats at the 1.25 and 5.0 mg/kg doses (ED₅₀=0.259 mg/kg, 95% confidence interval=0.089–0.755 mg/kg). This study is the first demonstration that rats can be trained to discriminate olanzapine from vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure and that the olanzapine discrimination cue generalizes to clozapine. Received: 11 June 1996 / Final version: 19 July 1996     

New and old antipsychotics versus clozapine in a monkey model: adverse effects and antiamphetamine effects

Rationale: Neuroleptic primed Cebus apella monkeys have proven reliable in screening antipsychotics for extrapyramidal side effect (EPS) potential in humans, and the ratio EPS liability/antiamphetamine efficacy [“therapeutic index” (TI)] has fit well with clinical results. Objectives: 1) To find the TIs of one new (quetiapine), three potential [NNC 756 (dopamine (DA) D₁ antagonist), NNC 22-0031 (alpha-1 adrenergic/5-HT₂ serotonergic/DA D₁ and D₂ antagonist) and DOD 647 (DA D₁ and D₂ antagonist)] and three old antipsychotics (haloperidol, melperone and clozapine), 2) to test the model further and 3) to gain more insight as to clozapine’s neuropharmacology. Methods: Seven monkeys received haloperidol daily for 2 years; all were sensitized to dystonia. All drugs were given SC, in increasing doses until two animals had dystonia/other adverse effects (AE), and in decreasing doses with a fixed dose of dextroamphetamine producing motor unrest and stereotypies, to find the minimum significant antiamphetamine dose (AA). The ratio AE/AA = TI. Results: Excepting clozapine and DOD 647, all drugs induced dystonia. At 2–4 mg/kg, clozapine caused uncoordinated movements, myoclonic jerks and rough tremor; unlike dystonia, the syndrome was not alleviated but worsened by the anticholinergic, biperiden. DOD 647 up to 2 mg/kg had no adverse effects. The TIs of the new and potential antipsychotics were 3–5 versus 4 for clozapine and 1 for haloperidol and melperone, suggesting that like clozapine, these new drugs will not produce EPS at antipsychotic doses. Received: 31 October 1997/Final version: 9 November 1998     

Effect of acute and chronic olanzapine treatment on phencyclidine-induced behavioral sensitization in rats with neonatal dopamine loss

In agreement with previous work, adult rats given selective lesions to dopamine (DA)-containing neurons as neonates exhibited a greater behavioral sensitization to repeated phencyclidine (PCP) treatment in comparison to sham-lesioned controls. Acute administration of olanzapine (1-5 mg/kg ip) or clozapine (15 mg/kg ip) decreased sensitized PCP-induced activity in both lesioned and control animals. Acute haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg ip) had no impact on PCP responsiveness in lesioned animals, but significantly antagonized PCP effects in sham-lesioned controls. Ketanserin, a selective 5-HT(2A)/5-HT(2C)-receptor antagonist, significantly reduced PCP activation in both lesioned and control rats, suggesting that the efficacy of atypical antipsychotics against PCP-induced sensitized responses may be mediated by one of the 5-HT(2)-receptor subtypes. A 6-week chronic regimen of orally administered olanzapine, clozapine, or haloperidol failed to block the sensitization induced by repeated PCP exposure. However, a 10-month oral olanzapine treatment significantly blunted the behavioral sensitization to repeated PCP exposure in lesioned animals, even after withdrawal from chronic olanzapine for more than 3 weeks. A 10-month oral haloperidol treatment had no effect on the sensitization induced by repeated PCP dosing. The persistent effect of chronic olanzapine administration on PCP sensitization may be relevant to the chronic therapeutic efficacy of atypical antipsychotics treating schizophrenia-a clinical syndrome linked to enhanced sensitivity to N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonists.     

Comparative characterisation of the discriminative stimulus properties of clozapine and other antipsychotics in rats

 The discriminative stimulus properties of the prototypical atypical neuroleptic clozapine (5 mg/kg, IP) were characterised in rats using a fixed ratio assay. Clozapine induced full dose-related generalization in the absence of response suppression. Amphetamine and pentylenetetrazol failed to generalise at doses known to be discriminable, showing a degree of specificity for the clozapine cue. The typical neuroleptics haloperidol and loxapine induced minimal (20%) generalization at doses with marked behavioural effects; thus clozapine discrimination dissociates clozapine from typical neuroleptics. Atypical neuroleptics which are not clozapine congeners produced weak partial generalization when tested up to the highest doses that could be studied. The maximal levels of generalization induced by these agents were: amisulpiride 28%, risperidone 40% and sertindole 50%. Clozapine congeners typically caused more generalization, the novel pyridobenzoxapine JL13 inducing 70% maximal generalization. Most generalization (83%) was seen with the clozapine congener seroquel, although in contrast to clozapine, it only generalised at doses with marked effects on responding, so that no drug mimicked clozapine fully. Surprisingly, the clozapine congener olanzapine only induced a maximal level of 38% generalization. This apparently anomalous finding is attributed to an inability to test high doses of the drug due to its rate-suppressant actions. The clozapine cue can be used to rank atypical neuroleptics in terms of their similarity to clozapine in vivo. The clozapine cue is probably a compound cue, since only agents showing “polyvalent” receptor pharmacology induced substantial generalization. Received: 19 May 1997 / Final version:25 July 1997     

The discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine in rats

Rationale: Analysis of the preclinical behavioral effects of atypical antipsychotic agents will provide a better understanding of how they differ from typical antipsychotics and aid in the development of future atypical antipsychotic drugs. Objectives: The present study was designed to provide information about the discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine. Methods: Rats were trained to discriminate the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine (either 0.5 mg/kg OLZ or 0.25 mg/kg OLZ, i.p.) from vehicle in a two- lever drug discrimination procedure. The atypical antipsychotic clozapine fully substituted for olanzapine in both the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group (99.3% drug lever responding [DLR]) and the 0.25-mg/kg OLZ group (99.9% DLR). The typical antipsychotic chlorpromazine also substituted for olanzapine in both the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group (87.5% DLR) and in the 0.25-mg/kg OLZ group (98.9% DLR); whereas, haloperidol displayed partial substitution for olanzapine in the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group (56.1% DLR) and in the 0.25-mg/kg OLZ group (76.4% DLR). The 5.0-mg/kg dose of thioridazine produced olanzapine-appropriate responding in the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group (99.6% DLR), but only partial substitution was seen with the 0.25-mg/kg OLZ training dose (64.0% DLR). The atypical antipsychotics raclopride (53.9% DLR) and risperidone (60.1% DLR) displayed only partial substitution in the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group. Both the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist scopolamine (90.0% DLR) and the 5-HT_2A/2C serotonergic antagonist ritanserin (86.0% DLR) fully substituted for olanzapine in the 0.5-mg/kg OLZ group. Conclusions: In contrast to previous discrimination studies with clozapine-trained rats, the typical antipsychotic agents chlorpromazine and thioridazine and the serotonin antagonist ritanserin substituted for olanzapine. These results demonstrate that there are differences in the mechanisms underlying the discriminative stimulus properties of clozapine and olanzapine. Specifically, olanzapine’s discriminative stimulus properties appear to be meditated in part by both cholinergic and serotonergic mechanisms. Received: 1 March 1999 / Final version: 6 September 1999     

Discrimination and self-administration of nicotine by inbred strains of mice

These studies aim to characterize the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in two inbred strains of mice that differ in many pharmacological responses, and to investigate the feasibility of IV self-administration studies with nicotine in one of the strains. For discrimination studies, three groups of C57BL/6 and one group of DBA/2 mice were trained in a two-lever operant conditioning paradigm with a tandem VI-30″ FR-10 schedule of food reinforcement. After 40 training sessions, accuracy reached 57.5, 77.5 and 90.0% in C57BL/6 mice trained with (–)-nicotine (SC) in doses of 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 mg/kg, respectively (n = 8). DBA/2 mice trained with 0.8 mg/kg nicotine attained similar (73.3%) accuracy (n = 9). Results from extinction tests showed that all groups of mice yielded orderly dose-response curves for nicotine (0.03–1.6 mg/kg), but stimulus control remained notably weaker for the mice trained with 0.4 mg/kg nicotine than for any other group. Overall rates of responding in the undrugged state were lower for DBA/2 than for C57BL/6 mice; DBA/2 mice were also slightly less sensitive than C57BL/6 mice to the response rate-reducing effect of nicotine. The nicotine antagonist mecamylamine (1.5 mg/kg SC) blocked the discriminative stimulus effect of the training dose of nicotine in all groups. The results of the IV self-administration study suggest that nicotine (0.1 mg/kg) can serve as a positive reinforcer in drug–naive C57BL/6J mice (n = 13). Behaviour maintained by 0.1 mg/kg nicotine injections was significantly greater than behaviour maintained by vehicle injections, and it was maintained under an intermittent schedule of reinforcement (FR4). The methods described provide possible approaches for genetic analyses of strain differences in sensitivity to the discriminative and reinforcing stimulus properties of nicotine. Received: 11 April 1998/Final version: 28 June 1998     

Activation of midline thalamic nuclei by antipsychotic drugs

The thalamus has been proposed as a site which may be involved in the production of the syndrome of schizophrenia and the response of schizophrenic symptoms to treatment. These studies test whether, consistent with this hypothesis, the activation of thalamic nuclei is a shared property of neuroleptic antipsychotic drugs. Rats were given single doses of the typical high and low potency neuroleptics haloperidol (1 mg/kg) and chlorpromazine (20 mg/kg), the atypical neuroleptics thiroridazine (20 mg/kg) and clozapine (20 mg/kg), the specific dopamine antagonist raclopride (3 mg/kg), the mixed dopamine/serotonin antagonist risperidone (3 mg/kg) or drug-free vehicle. Increased expression of Fos-like protein was utilized as a marker of cellular activation. All drugs tested, including typical and atypical antipsychotic agents, led to similar effects on the midline thalamic paraventricular, centromedian and rhomboid nuclei and the nucleus reuniens. These results suggest that midline thalamic nuclei may participate in neural circuits mediating some of the shared effects of antipsychotic drugs. Received: 9 January 1997/Final verion: 13 June 1997     

Seroquel, clozapine and chlorpromazine restore sensorimotor gating in ketamine-treated rats

Sensorimotor gating of the startle reflex – measured by prepulse inhibition (PPI) – is impaired in schizophrenia patients and in rats treated with either dopamine (DA) agonists or with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists. While both typical and atypical antipsychotics restore PPI in DA agonist-treated rats, studies thus far have demonstrated that only atypical antipsychotics restore PPI in rats treated with NMDA antagonists. This model for predicting atypical antipsychotic properties has been studied extensively in rats, and there is interest in moving these studies into humans, where the NMDA antagonist ketamine is also reported to significantly reduce PPI. In anticipation of such studies, and to facilitate the use of this model in humans, we examined the effects of high and low potency typical antipsychotics (haloperidol and chlorpromazine), the atypical antipsychotic clozapine, and the putative atypical antipsychotic, Seroquel, on ketamine-disrupted PPI in rats, across a range of ketamine that produced submaximal, as well as maximal disruptions of PPI. Ketamine dose-dependently reduced PPI, and this effect was significantly opposed by Seroquel, clozapine and chlorpromazine, but not haloperidol. The effects of chlorpromazine on ketamine-disrupted PPI demonstrate that the ability of antipsychotics to restore PPI in NMDA antagonist-treated rats is not specific to clinically atypical antipsychotics. Receptor properties shared by Seroquel, clozapine and chlorpromazine, but not haloperidol, may implicate critical substrates in the NMDA antagonist-induced disruption of PPI. Received: 31 December 1997/Final version: 11 March 1998     

The effects of the atypical antipsychotic amperozide on vacuous jaw movements in rats: a novel dose response profile

Classic neuroleptic drugs produce a syndrome of vacuous jaw movements in rats, and this syndrome has been offered as an animal model of early onset extrapyramidal side effects. The atypical antipsychotics do not produce elevations in vacuous jaw movements, or do so only at very high doses. The purpose of the present study was to determine the impact of the putative antipsychotic, amperozide, on vacuous jaw movements in rats. Groups of rats received daily injections of haloperidol (0.2, 0.4, or 0.8 mg/kg), clozapine (2.0, 4.0, 8.0 mg/kg), amperozide (2.0, 4.0, 8.0 mg/kg) or vehicle for 4 weeks. Once per week, rats were observed for the presence of vacuous jaw movements. Haloperidol increased vacuous jaw movements with increasing doses. Clozapine only produced elevations in vacuous jaw movements at the highest dose. In contrast, increasing doses of amperozide resulted in decreasing vacuous jaw movements for this portion of the dose-response curve. This is the first report of the effect of amperozide on vacuous jaw movements and results are discussed in terms of a potentially unique behavioral profile with respect to this behavior. Received: 22 February 1996/Final version: 15 December 1997