Effect of omeprazole on serum gastrin levels: influence of age and sex

Serum gastrin levels were determined in 120 consecutive patients (43 females, 77 males) with peptic disease 24 h post dose after 4 weeks continuous omeprazole (40 mg daily) treatment. Serum gastrin levels were elevated in 33 (28%) but exceeded the twice normal range in only 6 patients (5%). Age and sex did not influence the magnitude of gastrin levels. Gastrin increments induced by omeprazole compared to pretreatment with H2-blockers in 60 cases were similar in both males (42 +/- 10 pg/ml) and females (44 +/- 9 pg/ml). It is concluded that the magnitude of gastrin increases observed during omeprazole therapy are small and independent of age and sex.     

Prevention of Relapse of Reflux Esophagitis after Endoscopic Healing: The Efficacy and Safety of Omeprazole Compared with Ranitidine

Ninety-eight patients with erosive and/or ulcerative esophagitis unhealed after at least 3 months' treatment with standard doses of cimetidine (≥1200mg daily) or ranitidine (≥300 mg daily) were primarily included in an acute healing phase study, and 51 were allocated to 40 mg omeprazole once daily and 47 to 300 mg ranitidine twice daily. After 12 weeks of treatment, 46 (90%) patients given omeprazole were healed, compared with 22 (47%) allocated to ranitidine. Healed patients were then given maintenance treatment with either 20 mg omeprazole once daily or 150 mg ranitidine twice daily for 12 months. Plasma gastrin was determined and gastric mucosal biopsy specimens were obtained during the entire study to assess the structure of the exocrine and endocrine cell populations of the oxyntic mucosa. Sixty-seven per cent of the total number of patients randomized to omeprazole were maintained in clinical and endoscopic remission throughout the 12-month study period as compared with only 10% among those given ranitidine (p < 0.0001). After 4 weeks of omeprazole treatment basal gastrin levels were slightly increased, with a 95% confidence interval for the change of from 8.6 to 16.9pmol/l. No further increase in basal gastrin levels was observed during the ensuing study months. No significant histopathologic lesion was found in the oxyntic gland mucosa. In conclusion, omeprazole was far superior to ranitidine in preventing recurrence, a goal achieved without adverse events and significant abnormalities in the oxyntic mucosal exocrine or endocrine cells but with a moderate increase in basal gastrin levels.     

24-hour intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin during long-term treatment with omeprazole or ranitidine in patients with reflux esophagitis

The reduction in intragastric acidity and the subsequent increase in plasma gastrin were compared during long-term treatment with either omeprazole or ranitidine in 19 patients with erosive reflux esophagitis. The patients received 40 mg omeprazole in the morning or 300 mg ranitidine twice daily. After healing, half the dose was given as maintenance treatment for 1 year. Intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin were measured 24 h before entry and monthly with the high dose and after 1, 6, and 12 months with the low dose. Omeprazole reduced intragastric acidity more effectively than ranitidine (p less than 0.001). This difference in efficacy was more pronounced during the daytime. Plasma gastrin increased more after omeprazole than after ranitidine (p less than 0.01), and both drugs showed a normal postprandial response and approached fasting levels before the next dose. During long-term treatment with 20 mg omeprazole in the morning no progressive alterations were observed in 24-h intragastric acidity or plasma gastrin.     

Prevention of relapse of reflux esophagitis after endoscopic healing: the efficacy and safety of omeprazole compared with ranitidine.

Ninety-eight patients with erosive and/or ulcerative esophagitis unhealed after at least 3 months' treatment with standard doses of cimetidine (greater than or equal to 1200 mg daily) or ranitidine (greater than or equal to 300 mg daily) were primarily included in an acute healing phase study, and 51 were allocated to 40 mg omeprazole once daily and 47 to 300 mg ranitidine twice daily. After 12 weeks of treatment, 46 (90%) patients given omeprazole were healed, compared with 22 (47%) allocated to ranitidine. Healed patients were then given maintenance treatment with either 20 mg omeprazole once daily or 150 mg ranitidine twice daily for 12 months. Plasma gastrin was determined and gastric mucosal biopsy specimens were obtained during the entire study to assess the structure of the exocrine and endocrine cell populations of the oxyntic mucosa. Sixty-seven per cent of the total number of patients randomized to omeprazole were maintained in clinical and endoscopic remission throughout the 12-month study period as compared with only 10% among those given ranitidine (p less than 0.0001). After 4 weeks of omeprazole treatment basal gastrin levels were slightly increased, with a 95% confidence interval for the change of from 8.6 to 16.9 pmol/l. No further increase in basal gastrin levels was observed during the ensuing study months. No significant histopathologic lesion was found in the oxyntic gland mucosa. In conclusion, omeprazole was far superior to ranitidine in preventing recurrence, a goal achieved without adverse events and significant abnormalities in the oxyntic mucosal exocrine or endocrine cells but with a moderate increase in basal gastrin levels.     

24-Hour Intragastric Acidity and Plasma Gastrin during Long-Term Treatment with Omeprazole or Ranitidine in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis

The reduction in intragastric acidity and the subsequent increase in plasma gastrin were compared during long-term treatment with either omeprazole or ranitidine in 19 patients with erosive reflux esophagitis. The patients received 40 mg omeprazole in the morning or 300 mg ranitidine twice daily. After healing, half the dose was given as maintenance treatment for 1 year. Intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin were measured 24 h before entry and monthly with the high dose and after 1, 6, and 12 months with the low dose. Omeprazole reduced intragastric acidity more effectively than ranitidine (p < 0.001). This difference in efficacy was more pronounced during the daytime. Plasma gastrin increased more after omeprazole than after ranitidine (p < 0.01), and both drugs showed a normal postprandial response and approached fasting levels before the next dose. During long-term treatment with 20 mg omeprazole in the morning no progressive alterations were observed in 24-h intragastric acidity or plasma gastrin.     

Long-term omeprazole treatment in man: effects on gastric endocrine cell populations

36 patients with chronic gastric or oesophageal peptic ulceration (including 6 with antrectomy), resistant to high-dose ranitidine treatment for at least 3 months, were successfully treated with 40-60 mg of omeprazole daily for periods between 1 and 2 years. Fasting serum gastrin levels were monitored at regular intervals during therapy and multiple gastric mucosal biopsies were taken during gastroscopy every 3-6 months. Gastrin levels increased significantly during the first 6 months of therapy from a medium level of 81.5 to 206 pg/ml, a slight decrease was seen thereafter. In 10 patients investigated before the start of the treatment and after 1 and 2 years, the volume density of argyrophilic cells in the oxyntic mucosa increased from 0.43 +/- 0.08 to 0.91 +/- 0.14% during the first year; this change was statistically significant. No further increase was observed thereafter. No such difference could be demonstrated between a larger group of 18 patients investigated before and after 1 year of treatment with omeprazole (0.806 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.93 +/- 0.08%) and between a larger group of 22 untreated patients and 17 patients treated for 17-24 months with omeprazole (0.73 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.86 +/- 0.09%). The volume density of argyrophilic cells found in 8 patients with gastrinoma amounted to 1.37 +/- 0.22%. No clusters of endocrine cells were found in omeprazole-treated patients. The D cell volume density in the antral mucosa decreased significantly during the first months of treatment, but steadily increased thereafter to reach pretreatment values after 17 months. There was no change in G cell volume density under therapy. No changes in gastrin levels or oxyntic argyrophilic cells were observed in the antrectomized patients. It is concluded that the hyperplasia of argyrophilic cells observed in some patients during long-term omeprazole treatment is mediated by hypergastrinaemia.     

Effect of duodenal ulcer healing induced by omeprazole and ranitidine on the generation of gastroduodenal eicosanoids, platelet-activating factor, pepsinogen A, and gastrin in duodenal ulcer patients.

The effect of duodenal ulcer healing induced by omeprazole on gastroduodenal generation of eicosanoids, platelet-activating factor (PAF), pepsinogen A, and gastrin was evaluated. Sixty patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were randomized to receive 20 mg omperazole once daily or 300 mg ranitidine at bedtime for 2 weeks. Patients whose ulcers did not heal were treated for an additional 2 weeks. Endoscopic biopsy specimens and serum samples were obtained before and after treatment. There was no significant difference in the healing rate between the two treatment modalities. At 2 weeks healing rates were 60% and 56% in the omperazole and ranitidine groups, respectively, whereas at 4 weeks the respective healing rates were 96% and 86%. Ulcer healing induced by omeprazole and ranitidine was not accompanied by significant changes in mucosal leukotriene B4 or C4 generation. Mucosal PAF significantly decreased in patients treated with omeprazole for 4 weeks. In omperazole-treated patients there was a trend towards increase in mucosal prostaglandin E2 generation which was significant in the fundus after 4 weeks of treatment. After 2 weeks of omeprazole treatment, serum gastrin and pepsinogen A levels almost doubled when compared with their pretreatment levels. In conclusion, duodenal ulcer healing with 20 mg omeprazole daily is not superior to healing rates with 300 mg ranitidine at bedtime after both 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. In omeprazole-treated subjects ulcer healing was accompanied by a significant decrease in mucosal PAF generation and increased levels of serum gastrin and pepsinogen A.     

U.S. experience with omeprazole in duodenal ulcer

To assess the comparative efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg, a proton pump inhibitor, versus ranitidine 150 mg twice a day, an H2-receptor antagonist, in healing duodenal ulcers we performed a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in 309 patients with endoscopically diagnosed ulcers. Patients were treated for up to four weeks and were seen at week 2 and at week 4, if unhealed at week 2, for determination of ulcer status by endoscopy, review of daily self-assessment symptom diaries, and clinical laboratory including fasting serum gastrin. Gastrin levels were repeated two weeks after cessation of study medication. Evaluation of baseline demographic and laboratory parameters demonstrated no significant differences between the two groups at entry. At week 2, 42% of the omeprazole and 34% of the ranitidine-treated patients were healed (P = NS). At week 4, there was a 19% advantage in ulcer healing for the omeprazole-treated patients in comparison to those treated with ranitidine (82% vs 63%, respectively, P less than 0.05). Healing of ulcers greater than or equal to 1.0 cm occurred in 83% of those treated with omeprazole versus 37% treated with ranitidine (P less than 0.01). There were no significant differences in rate of pain relief or incidence of clinical laboratory abnormalities. Mean fasting serum gastrin value during treatment increased over the baseline in both groups, (P less than 0.05). The percent change was significantly greater with omeprazole but few patients had elevations above the upper limit of normal for the assay. Both drugs were well tolerated. Omeprazole 20 mg demonstrated superiority in healing duodenal ulcers at four weeks in comparison to ranitidine 150 mg twice daily and was more effective in healing ulcers greater than or equal to 1.0 cm.     

OMEPRAZOLE AND COMPLICATED GASTRO-OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE

Abstract Suppression of acid secretion with omeprazole is highly effective for the healing of oesophagitis. The aims of the present study were to determine whether recovery of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with stricture improves dysphagia and decreases the dilatation need and to compare the efficacy of omeprazole versus H₂-receptor antagonists. Thirty-eight patients with peptic stricture (grade IV oesophagitis) and erosive oesophagitis underwent endoscopic dilatation and were randomized to omeprazole (40 mg daily; n = 20) versus ranitidine (150 mg twice daily; n=18). Healing was proven endoscopically and patients were interviewed for dysphagia relief. Patients were assessed for relapse by endoscopy 6 months later. The follow-up period was a further 6 months. Patients received maintenance treatment with 40 mg omeprazole daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily and the total duration of treatment was 1 year. At 6 months, omeprazole produced a highly significant (P < 0.0001) greater rate of oesophagitis healing and highly significant (P < 0.0001) fewer dilatations compared with H₂-receptor antagonists (18 (90%) patients vs five (28%) patients, respectively; 3.5 vs 9.0 dilatations/patient). At 12 months, not one of the 18 successfully treated patients from the omeprazole group had relapsed. The two remaining patients required further dilatation and 40 and 60 mg omeprazole daily for healing. In comparison, all patients on ranitidine had to undergo further bougienage. In conclusion, omeprazole is a safe and effective maintenance treatment for preventing relapse of complicated reflux oesophagitis.     

Amoxicillin plus omeprazole versus triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease: a prospective, randomized, and controlled study.

Treatment with amoxicillin and omeprazole resulted in encouraging Helicobacter pylori eradication rates in pilot studies that included medium term follow up. These results were evaluated in a prospective, randomised and controlled study. Forty patients with active duodenal ulcer disease and H pylori colonisation of the gastric mucosa were randomly assigned to receive either omeprazole (20 mg twice daily) and amoxicillin suspension (500 mg four times daily) for two weeks (group I) or bismuth subsalicylate (600 mg three times daily), metronidazole (400 mg three times daily), tetracycline (500 mg three times daily), and ranitidine (300 mg in the evening) for two weeks (group II). Study medication was followed in both groups by a four week treatment course with 300 mg ranitidine up to the final examination. One patient from each group was lost to follow up. H pylori was eradicated in 78.9% of group I and 84.2% of group II (p = 1.00). All ulcers in patients on omeprazole plus amoxicillin healed but in the triple treatment group four patients had residual peptic lesions after six weeks (ulcer healing rate: 78.9%, p = 0.11). Complete pain relief occurred after a median duration of 1 day in group I and of 6 days in group II (p = 0.03). There were no major complications in either group but minor side effects were more frequently recorded in patients on triple therapy (63.2% v 15.8%, p < 0.01). In conclusion, two weeks of treatment with omeprazole plus amoxicillin is as good as triple therapy plus ranitidine in eradicating H pylori but seems better with regard to safety, pain relief, and ulcer healing. Thus, amoxicillin plus omeprazole should be recommended as the treatment of choice in eradicating H pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer disease.     

Omeprazole (20 mg daily) compared to ranitidine (150 mg twice daily) in the treatment of esophagitis caused by reflux. Results of a double-blind randomized multicenter trial in France and Belgium

We report the results of a trial of omeprazole 20 mg daily versus ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. in the short-term management of erosive or ulcerative esophagitis. The principal aim of the trial was to assess the healing rates of the esophageal lesions. The trial was conducted in 19 centers (16 in France and 3 in Belgium). The lesions of the esophageal mucosa were defined as follows: grade 2 (n = 112), round or linear erosions; grade 3 (n = 33), confluent erosions affecting the total esophageal circumference; or grade 4 (n = 11), erosions as described above plus deep ulcerations or peptic stenosis which did not need endoscopic dilatation. The main criterion was the complete healing of esophageal lesions after 4 weeks of treatment. Patients were randomly allocated to double-blind treatment with omeprazole or ranitidine. Clinical and endoscopic examinations were done on inclusion in the trial and at day 29 +/- 6, and again at day 57 +/- 6 if esophagitis was unhealed. No patient was excluded from the analysis on an "intention-to-treat" basis, and 25 patients were excluded from the "per protocol" analysis, mainly because of poor compliance with the trial protocol. The healing rate at weak 4 was 50 of 62 patients (81 p. 100) treated with omeprazole and 31 of 69 patients (45 p. 100) with ranitidine (p less than 0.001). The corresponding figures at week 8 were 58 of 61 (95 p. 100) and 40 of 61 (65 p. 100) (p less than 0.001).     

Prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse with omeprazole 20 mg daily: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Abstract We report the first double-blind, placebo-controlled study that assesses the efficacy and safety of omeprazole 20 mg daily in the maintenance treatment of duodenal ulcer. For the healing phase, 128 patients with endoscopically proven active duodenal ulcer and a history of three or more relapses during the 2 years prior to the study were treated until healing with omeprazole 40 mg daily for 2 and up to 8 weeks. One hundred and twenty-three patients whose ulcers were healed were randomized to receive omeprazole 20 mg daily (n = 60) or placebo (n = 63) for 12 months as maintenance treatment. Patients were interviewed at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and endoscopy was performed at 3, 6 and 12 months and whenever symptoms recurred. The healing rates of the 124 patients completing the healing phase were 84, 98 and 100% at 2, 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. During the maintenance phase, eight and four patients discontinued treatment from the omeprazole and placebo groups, respectively. The proportion of patients in remission in the omeprazole group and placebo group after 12 months were 94 and 9% respectively (life table estimates, P < 0.0001). No significant clinical or laboratory changes were observed in patients on therapy with omeprazole. Patients with a history of frequent relapses thus continued to have a very high relapse rate without prophylactic treatment. Omeprazole 20 mg daily was effective and safe in maintaining such patients in remission.     

Long-term efficacy and tolerability of omeprazole in 20 patients with severe Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

Omeprazole efficacy and tolerance were evaluated in 20 patients with longstanding Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) committed to long-term antisecretory therapy. The study included 13 men and 7 women, aged 53 (30-74) years (median and range). Nineteen patients presented with epigastric pain, 14 with vomiting, and 9 with diarrhea. All patients had gastroduodenal ulcerations, associated with esophagitis in 9 cases. Median and extreme values for basal acid output (BAO) and serum gastrin (SG) levels before omeprazole treatment were 41 (3.7-80) mmol H+/h and 413 (111-11,490) pg/ml, respectively. In 18 patients, omeprazole treatment was initiated because of resistance to H2-antagonists, and in 2 patients because of carbothioamide RP 40749 discontinuation. Initial doses of omeprazole were 60 mg per day in 10 patients and ranged from 80 to 160 mg per day in the others. Esophagogastrectomy was performed in one patient at day 15 because of esophageal stenosis. In the remaining 19 patients, median duration of treatment was 16 (7-54) months and median doses of omeprazole were 70 (20-160) mg per day during the survey. Omeprazole therapy was highly effective in inducing rapid disappearance of clinical abnormalities in 18 of 19 patients. Twenty-two days after initiation of treatment, median BAO was 4 (0-14) mmol/h and ulcerations had healed in 17 of 19 patients. Median BAO was less than 5 mmol/h during follow-up. However, asymptomatic ulcer recurrence was noted in 4 patients, but disappeared quickly after omeprazole doses were increased. Median basal gastrin level was 700 (116-36.625) pg/ml at the least determination and was statistically higher than pretreatment values (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Omeprazole versus high-dose ranitidine in mild gastroesophageal reflux disease: short- and long-term treatment. The Dutch Reflux Study Group

OBJECTIVE: Patients with reflux esophagitis suffer from a chronic condition that may cause considerable discomfort because of recurrent symptoms and diminished quality of life. This study was designed to evaluate acute and long-term treatment comparing standard doses of omeprazole and high-dose ranitidine. METHODS: Patients with endoscopically verified symptomatic esophagitis grade I or II were initially treated with omeprazole 20 mg daily or ranitidine 300 mg twice daily for 4-8 wk. Patients who were symptom free were randomized to maintenance treatment with omeprazole 10 mg daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. Patients were seen every 3 months or at symptomatic relapse. RESULTS: The percentage of asymptomatic patients after 4 and 8 wk treatment were 61% and 74%, respectively, for omeprazole and 31% and 50%, respectively, for ranitidine. Of 446 patients treated initially, 277 were asymptomatic, of whom 263 entered the maintenance study. The estimated proportion of patients in remission after 12 months of maintenance treatment with omeprazole 10 mg daily (n = 134) and ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (n = 129) were 68% and 39%, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole 20 mg daily is superior to high-dose ranitidine in the symptomatic treatment of reflux esophagitis grade I and II. Furthermore, omeprazole at half the standard dose is more effective than ranitidine in a standard dose in keeping patients in remission for a period of 12 months.     

Gastric acid secretion and plasma gastrin during short-term treatment with omeprazole and ranitidine in duodenal ulcer patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in peptic acid secretion, and in fasting and meal-stimulated plasma gastrin levels after a 7-day course of omeprazole 30 mg/day or ranitidine 300 mg/day, administered in accordance with a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy protocol. Ten duodenal ulcer patients were studied. Their acid and pepsin output was determined prior to and after treatment. Plasma gastrin levels were also determined under basal conditions on day 7 of treatment, and 24 hours after the last administration of the drug. With regard to acid output, omeprazole resulted in a 98% reduction in BAO and an 80% reduction in PAO, both significantly greater than those achieved with ranitidine (BAO 50%, PAO 25%). No significant changes in pepsin secretion were observed. The increase in fasting plasma gastrin observed after ranitidine and omeprazole was 86% and 242%, respectively, on day 7, and 13% and 103% twenty-four hours after final dose. Increases in meal-stimulated plasma gastrin were, respectively, 126% and 125% on day 7 and 8 after omeprazole, whereas the increase with ranitidine was 62% only on day 7 of treatment, with subsequent normalization. In addition to confirming the well-known effect of omeprazole on the physiology of gastric secretion, our data show that administration of therapeutic doses of traditional H2-antagonists is accompanied by a secondary hypergastrinemia, which is rapidly reversible after discontinuation of therapy.     

Comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine in treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with gastric acid hypersecretion

Secretion of gastric acid and volume, serum gastrin concentration, and ambulatory 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring were evaluated prospectively in 12 patients with idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion (basal acid output greater than 10.0 meq/hr) undergoing treatment for refractory chronic long-standing pyrosis. Treatment lasted six months and consisted of three months of ranitidine (mean 2150 mg/day, range 1200–3000 mg/day), followed by three months of omeprazole (mean 33 mg/day, range 20–60 mg/day). Both ranitidine and omeprazole significantly reduced gastric acid output (P<0.001) and gastric volume output (P<0.001) compared to a basal evaluation and resulted in complete disappearance of pyrosis. Total reflux time (percent 24 hr intraesophageal pH less than 4) was significantly reduced by ranitidine (P<0.02) and omeprazole (P<0.001) compared to basal evaluation; however, the effects of omeprazole were significantly greater than ranitidine (P<0.05). Omeprazole caused a significant increase in serum gastrin concentration compared to both basal and ranitidine (P<0.05). Endoscopically documented erosive esophagitis was present in nine of the 12 patients, and seven of the 12 patients had Barrett's epithelium. All 12 patients had complete resolution of pyrosis and healed esophagitis by six months, but no significant endoscopic regression was observed in the extent of Barrett's epithelium. No side effects occurred with these high doses of ranitidine or omeprazole. These results indicate that high-dose ranitidine and omeprazole are effective therapy for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, with omeprazole, total reflux times are reduced more than with ranitidine, often into the normal range. That marked reduction of gastric acid secretion with omeprazole, which greatly reduces total reflux times, accounts for the significant elevation of serum gastrin concentration seen during omeprazole therapy.     

Bleeding from staple line erosion after esophageal transection: effect of omeprazole.

Esophageal staple transection effectively controls acute variceal bleeding, but up to 50% of these patients will have recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In our experience, most of these bleeding episodes are caused by total or partial circumferential ulceration at the level of the staple transection: staple line erosion. It caused rebleeding in 29 (40%) of our patients. Whereas the pathogenesis of this lesion is unknown, acid reflux is a consequence of transection surgery. Assuming that staple line erosion could be healed by acid suppression therapy, thereby preventing recurrent bleeding, an acid suppression regimen was evaluated prospectively in 24 patients. Only six (25%) healed with daily standard (300 mg) or high-dose (1,200 mg) ranitidine combined with sucralfate (4 gm). The remaining 18 (75%) healed after omeprazole administration (40 mg/day) for 1 mo. Maintenance ranitidine alone (300 mg/day) was introduced, but 11 (48%) had relapse of erosions. All 11 healed with omeprazole (40 mg/day) for 2 mo, but again on maintenance ranitidine, 10 relapsed. All healed with further omeprazole and healing persisted with long-term administration (20 mg/day). Fifteen rebleeding episodes occurred in eight patients on maintenance ranitidine. Whereas relapse of staple line erosions did occur in the absence of rebleeding, all rebleeding episodes were associated with the relapse of staple line erosion. Omeprazole is more effective than ranitidine alone and combined with sucralfate in healing staple line erosion. Omeprazole prevents rebleeding, which may enhance the long-term benefits of staple transection for acute variceal bleeding.     

Intravenous therapy with high doses of ranitidine and omeprazole in critically ill patients with bleeding peptic ulcerations of the upper intestinal tract: an open randomized controlled trial

Thirty-nine critically ill patients with actively bleeding peptic ulcerations--Forrest Ib--in the stomach or duodenum were randomly allocated to intravenous therapy with 400 mg ranitidine per day or 80 mg omeprazole per day (120 mg on the 1st day) for 5 days. Successful therapy was proven by control endoscopy on day 6 if less than 2.5 liters of blood had to be transfused from the start of therapy to maintain a hemoglobin value of 10g/l or above. Treatment failure meant that more than 2.5 liters of blood were necessary to maintain a hemoglobin level above 10 g/l. Of 20 patients in the ranitidine group bleeding stopped in only 3 patients (15%). Of 17 patients who continued bleeding under ranitidine therapy the bleeding could be controlled in 13 patients after changing to omeprazole treatment. Of 19 patients in the omeprazole group bleeding stopped in 16 patients (84%). These results demonstrate that the significantly more effective reduction of acidity by omeprazole is promising for the therapy of bleeding peptic ulcerations and may reduce the need for invasive therapy or operation.     

Omeprazole in the treatment of erosive oesophagitis refractory to high dose cimetidine and ranitidine.

Forty five patients with refractory oesophagitis, defined as persisting erosive changes or ulceration despite a minimum of three months' treatment with cimetidine 3.2 g daily or ranitidine 0.9 g daily, were treated in an open trial with omeprazole 40 mg daily for up to eight weeks. Endoscopically defined healing was observed in 73% of patients after four weeks' treatment and in 91% after eight weeks' treatment. Symptoms were completely relieved in 60% of patients, improved in 34%, unchanged in 4%, and worsened in 2%. After healing patients returned to maintenance treatment with cimetidine 1.6-3.2 g daily, depending on the severity of their illness before treatment with omeprazole. By six months and 12 months only 55% and 33% of patients respectively were still in remission. This study suggests that when erosive oesophagitis is refractory to treatment with high dose cimetidine or ranitidine, treatment with omeprazole 40 mg daily for up to eight weeks is effective in inducing healing and relieving symptoms.     

潘托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡临床疗效观察

目的：研究潘托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡的疗效及安全性。方法：将经胃镜证实的消化性溃疡患者随机分成潘托拉唑组（治疗组,简称潘组）和奥美拉唑组（对照组,简称奥组）,其中潘组60例,应用潘托拉唑40mg,1次／d;奥组58例;应用败类美拉唑20mg,1次／d。十二指肠溃疡患者疗程4周,胃溃疡6周。停药后均复查胃镜观察溃疡愈合情况。治疗期间每周随访1次。并记录症状改善情况及不良反应。结果：十二指肠溃疡的愈合率两组分别为91．7％和94．7％,胃溃疡的愈合率两组分别为91．7％反应。结果十二指肠溃疡的愈合率两组分别为91．7％和94．7％,胃溃疡的愈合率两组分别为91．7％和90．0％,P值均＞0．05。各项症状的改善情况两组相仿（P＞0．05）。治疗期间,两组均有良好的耐受性。结论潘托拉唑对消化性溃疡有较高的治愈率和症状改善率。疗效与奥美拉唑相当,其不良反应很少,患者耐受性好,是一种有应用前景的质子泵抑制剂。