A comparison of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the kinematic stabilizer prosthesis

The first 121 arthroplasties (in 105 patients) in which the cemented kinematic-stabilizer total knee prosthesis was used for primary arthroplasty or surgical revision at the Mayo Clinic were reviewed. Sixty-six patients (seventy-nine arthroplasties) were followed for a mean of thirty-seven months. There were fifty-three revision and twenty-six primary arthroplasties. The average range of motion in both groups increased from 95 to 101 degrees. Although none of these patients could ascend stairs without support before the operation, thirty-two (51 per cent) could do so at the time of the final follow-up. The incidence of moderate or severe pain was reduced from 86 to 6 per cent. Moderate or severe ligamentous instability had been present in thirty-three knees (42 per cent) preoperatively, but only five knees had significant medial, lateral, anterior, or posterior instability at final follow-up. The Hospital for Special Surgery knee score increased from an average of 56 points to 83 points in all of the knees. At follow-up, the patients who had had primary arthroplasty had 92 per cent good or excellent results and the patients who had had surgical revision had 81 per cent good or excellent results (p less than 0.05). There was no significant difference in the results between the patients who had osteoarthritis and those who had rheumatoid arthritis. Over-all, 85 per cent of the results were good or excellent at final follow-up. Tibial radiolucent lines of one to two millimeters were observed in 29 per cent of the knees at follow-up.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Clinical and radiological outcomes after revision to the low‐contact‐stress mobile‐bearing total knee arthroplasty

Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate the short–medium‐term clinical and radiological outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty using a mobile‐bearing implant. Methods: Forty patients (42 knees) who had revisions using the New Jersey low‐contact‐stress (LCS) mobile‐bearing total knee arthroplasty between 1996 and 2000 were reviewed. Results: The average age at revision was 71 years (range, 38–86 years) and the average follow up was 6 years (range, 5–9 years). Of the 34 patients reviewed clinically, six had excellent results, and 20 had good results, to give a total of 76% excellent or good results. There were five (15%) fair results and three (9%) poor results. Seven patients required revision of the components. There was one case of instability within the first year of revision, which required only exchange of the polyethylene bearing to achieve a satisfactory clinical outcome. Of the 31 knees reviewed radiologically, progressive radiolucent lines were seen at the bone–cement interface in five (16%) of the femoral components and in two (6%) of the tibial components. Conclusion: Unconstrained LCS mobile‐bearing total knee arthroplasty can be used in revision surgery with satisfactory results after medium‐term follow up (level of evidence: therapeutic level III).     

Valgus high tibial osteotomy. A long-term follow-up study

One hundred twenty-eight knees in 107 patients with osteoarthrosis treated by valgus high tibial osteotomy were clinically reviewed. Patients were reviewed from three to 15 years postoperatively (mean, 7.5 years). The revision rate in the osteoarthrotic population was 10.9%. Patients who were older than 60 years of age at the time of surgery had results comparable to those patients who were younger than 60 years of age at the time of surgery. Women and men appeared to have a similar prognosis; 79.6% good and excellent results up to nine years; at ten to 15 years, 70% good and excellent.     

Revision shoulder stabilization: 2- to 10-year results

We evaluated 43 patients who underwent revision shoulder stabilization between 1978 and 1992. Twenty-three shoulders in 23 patients had unidirectional anterior shoulder instability (group A), whereas 21 shoulders in 20 patients exhibited multiple directions of shoulder instability (group B). Within group A recurrent instability developed at a mean of 35.5 months after the initial stabilization. Recurrence was traumatic in 12 patients. Revision surgery included a Bankart repair in 19 patients (coupled with capsular shift in 15 and a Bristow in 1) and capsular shift alone in 4. Within group B recurrent instability developed at a mean of only 16 months after the initial stabilization and was traumatic in only 2 patients. Revision surgery included capsular shift in 11 patients, Bankart repair in 5, anterior/posterior graft reconstruction in 3, and posterior bone block in 2. All patients had significant capsular laxity. A Bankart lesion was found in only 24% of patients. The mean follow-up from revision was 77.3 months (range 24 to 196 months) in group A. The results were excellent in 8 patients, good in 7, fair in 4, and poor in 4. Three of the 4 failures, however, had undergone successful reoperation before follow-up, improving the number of good or excellent results to 18 (78%). In contrast, at a mean follow-up of 61.5 months, only 9 (39%) good or excellent results occurred in group B despite multiple reoperations. Four patients ultimately went on to have glenohumeral fusion. Revision shoulder stabilization is a reliable procedure for patients who have recurrent anterior instability; however, it is unpredictable in patients who have multidirectional instability, with surgical failure and reoperation occurring frequently.     

Total hip arthroplasty in patients who have chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Twenty patients who had chronic lymphocytic leukemia underwent 25 elective primary total hip arthroplasties at the Mayo Clinic. No patient had a post-operative prosthetic infection. No patient had an intraoperative or postoperative hemorrhagic complication. One patient had a revision for aseptic loosening. After an average follow-up period of 4.6 years, there were 84% good and excellent results. It is concluded that patients who have early-stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia may not be at increased risk for major perioperative or postoperative complications in total hip arthroplasty. The surgeon must remain vigilant for postoperative complications, but satisfactory clinical results can be obtained in this patient population.     

Twenty-year evaluation of the New Jersey LCS Rotating Platform Knee Replacement

Clinical results of the initial cemented and cementless series of 233 New Jersey Low Contact Stress Rotating Platform Knee Replacements in 184 patients surviving at least 10 years were analyzed using a strict knee scoring scale. The study showed excellent (46.7%) and good (53.3%) results in primary cemented rotating platform knee replacements, and excellent (68.1%), good (29.8%), and fair (2.1%) results in primary cementless rotating platform knee replacements. Radiographic evaluation at a minimum 10-year follow-up showed stable fixation of all components, no gross migration but significant osteolysis requiring bearing exchange, and bone grafting in three cementless rotating platform knee replacements (1.8%) in three patients who underwent previous surgeries at an average 10.2 years from the index surgery. Survivorship of the patients who underwent primary cemented rotating platform knee replacements with end points of revision for any mechanical reason or a poor clinical knee score was 97.7% at 10 and 20 years. Survivorship of the patients who underwent cementless rotating platform knee replacements with end points of revision for any mechanical reason or a poor clinical knee score was 98.3% at 10 and 18 years.     

Total knee arthroplasty in elderly patients. Comparison of tibial component designs.

The authors examined 98 total knee arthroplasties in 73 patients who were 80 years of age or older at the time of surgery (average, 82 years; range, 80-90 years). The follow-up period averaged 4.5 years (range, 2-12 years). The patients were divided into two groups based on their tibial component design. There were 38 all-polyethylene tibial components in 28 patients and 60 metal-backed tibial components in 45 patients. There were 61 (62%) excellent, 30 (31%) good, 2 (2%) fair, and 5 (5%) poor results. Three of the five poor results required revision for septic failure. Of the knees with an all-polyethylene tibial component, 20 (53%) were rated as excellent, 15 (39%) as good, and 3 (8%) as poor. One of these knees rated as poor required revision for septic failure. The knees with a metal-backed tibial tray had 41 (68%) rated as excellent, 15 (25%) as good, 2 (3%) as fair, and 2 (3%) as poor. Both of the knees with poor results required revision for septic failure. Stratifying the results by component composition revealed 97% survival for both types of tibial trays. These results were obtained at 12 years for the all-polyethylene components and at 8 years for the metal-backed prosthesis. In conclusion, the authors believe that total knee arthroplasty is a reliable and durable procedure in the treatment of knee arthritis in the elderly. Elderly patients may represent a special case because they are generally less active than younger patients and may place less stress on their prosthesis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-term follow-up of triple arthrodesis

Thirty-seven children in whom 46 triple arthrodeses had been performed were followed up for 19 to 33 years (average, 24 years). Better results were evident in patients who had been operated on because of poliomyelitis, pes cavus or pes planus than in patients operated on for club foot, cerebral palsy or spina bifida. The use of staples appeared to improve the result. A neutral position of the heel is desirable. Varus positions required revision in three patients. A heel-toe gait was noticeable in 74% of patients. Osteoarthritis occurred 24% and pseudarthrosis in 4% of our patients. In 91% of patients the functional result could be described as good or excellent.     

Total knee arthroplasty in patients after patellectomy

Twenty-six total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were evaluated in 22 patients who had had a patellectomy. Fourteen knees (12 patients) had a primary TKA, and 12 patients had a revision TKA. Two patients in the revision group, whose prostheses failed, were from the primary TKA group. The mean follow-up time was 8.5 years in the primary TKA group and 7.6 years in the revision TKA group. A group of 14 control knees with patellae was randomly generated but matched for prosthesis, diagnosis, surgeon, age, and time of surgery. This group was similarly evaluated with an average follow-up time of 6.9 years. The primary TKA group had seven knees that were rated as good or excellent, two as fair, and three as poor. The control group had a significantly higher average rating than the primary TKA group. In this group, there were 12 good or excellent knees, three fair, and none poor. Postoperative pain, flexion contracture, extension lag, and range of motion all contributed significant information to the final score, whereas other variables (walking, function, strength, and instability) did not contribute any additional information. Although higher overall scores may have been expected if the patients had patellae, the results during the follow-up examination were satisfactory and justified TKA in these patients. In general, however, patients without patellae may be at a higher risk for failure of the prosthesis, as seen in five patients having primary TKA and another ten patients with failed TKA requiring revision.     

Revision resurfacing knee arthroplasty for aseptic loosening

This re-investigation presents our experience with revision resurfacing knee arthroplasty caused by aseptic failure. The evaluation of the results should elucidate the benefit of revision, its complications as well as the impact of the implant type used. The study involved 36 patients whose primary resurfacing knee prostheses failed by aseptic loosening. The rather elderly patients (average 68.3 years) underwent revision 6 years later on average. In 30 cases (83.3%), arthroplasty could be repeated with resurfacing implants, whereas the use of hinge prostheses was unavoidable in 6 knees (16.7%). After an average of 7 years later, 30 knees were re-investigated according to the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scoring system. Results were compared with the HSS values prior to revision. Complications and revised implant survivorship were reported chronologically. The revision knees had a 80% incidence of improved HSS score. In 73.3% the outcome was graded as good or even excellent. In contrast, scoring values before revision were dissatisfying without exception. The early complication rate after operation was 25%. Persisting pain, instability and limited mobility led to repeated revision in two cases and arthrodesis of one of the knees. The outcome of revision after 7 years revealed a remarkable early complication rate. Nevertheless, good or excellent results could be scored after implantation of PFC, PFC-modular, TC and TCIII prostheses. Received: 29 October 1996     

The fate of revised uncemented acetabular components in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The results of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had revision hip arthroplasty have been studied infrequently. The purpose of this study was to review the authors' clinical and radiographic experiences and outcomes with revision hip arthroplasty. Revision total hip arthroplasties were done on 28 patients (30 hips). All hips had morselized bone grafting and four hips had bulk allografts for segmental defects. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 50 years (range, 20-74 years). Patients were followed up for 4 to 15 years (mean, 7 years). At the latest followup, 14 hips (13 patients) of the 30 hips (47%) had good and excellent Harris hip score ratings. Mechanical failures included six hips (five patients) that had revision arthroplasty and two hips (two patients) that had resection arthroplasty. Six other hips (five patients) had poor Harris hip score ratings. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve for failure of the acetabular component revealed an 89% chance of survivorship curve for failure of the acetabular component revealed an 89% chance of survival at 60 months and a 44% chance of survival at 108 months. Based on the results of this study, revision hip arthroplasty for acetabular loosening with a cementless acetabular prosthesis has a low rate of success in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.     

Results of cementless revisions of total hip arthroplasties using the Harris-Galante prosthesis

Sixty patients were treated with Harris-Galante prosthesis for failed, nonseptic, cemented total hip arthroplasties. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months, although 23 patients were followed for two or more years. Acetabular bone grafting was done in 86% and femoral bone grafting in 57% of the patients. The average postoperative hip score was 84 (range, 48-100). Seventy-one percent of the patients were rated good or excellent. Among those with a minimum two-year follow-up examination, 73% had good or excellent results. Ninety-six percent had no, slight, or only mild pain. None of the components has required revision. No pads have become loose or displaced and no sepsis has occurred. One femoral component has subsided, but the patient is asymptomatic. No socket has migrated. The results are excellent for this group of patients.     

Total knee arthroplasty in patellectomized patients

Thirty-two total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in patellectomized patients were evaluated with recent clinical and radiographic examinations. Eighteen patients had primary TKA with a mean follow-up period of 49 months, and 14 patients had a revision TKA with a mean follow-up period of 36 months. A control group of 13 TKA patients with intact patellae were randomly generated but matched for age, sex, follow-up data, diagnosis, and prosthesis. Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining types of prostheses were used in the primary knees, while the revision knees underwent arthroplasties with the more constrained, posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses. All knees were evaluated based on the Knee Society's clinical and radiographic scoring system. In addition, 18 patients (9 primary, 9 revision) underwent isokinetic dynamometer testing for quantitation of peak quadriceps and hamstring torque. The knee score, indicative of pain relief, averaged 82.5 in the primary group (16 good/excellent, 1 fair, 1 poor), 86.5 in the revision group (12 good/excellent, 1 fair, 1 poor), and 93,9 in the control group (13/13 excellent). The function score averaged 59.7 in the primary group (6 good/excellent, 6 fair, 6 poor), 60.0 in the revision group (5 good/excellent, 2 fair, 7 poor), and 80.9 in the control group (12 good/excellent, 1 fair). The lower function scores predominantly reflected the patients' difficulty in independently climbing or descending stairs. This was also reflected in their higher flexion to extension peak torque ratios. There was one failure in the primary group requiring a revision and one failure in the revision group requiring a knee fusion. There was no radiographic evidence of impending failure in any of the remaining knees. No clinical or radiographic differences were found between the patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Although the knee and function scores were lower in the patellectomized patients, the overall results were generally satisfactory without a high incidence of failures. Satisfactory results were obtained in the primary TKAs using the minimally constrained prostheses when the posterior cruciate ligament was intact. Revision TKAs, in which the posterior cruciate ligament was absent, also demonstrated satisfactory results with the more constrianed, posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses.     

Reconstruction of the lower urinary tract for neurogenic bladder: lessons from the adolescent age group.

Of 42 adolescents with neurogenic bladder who presented for lower urinary tract reconstruction, 4 patients with severe spina bifida were unfit for major surgery. Five patients had a simple undiversion; 4 of these had a poor outcome because of unpredicted sphincter incontinence (1 patient) or instability (3). A total of 26 patients had an enterocystoplasty. All 7 patients who had a substitution cystoplasty had a good result, as did 3 males with a clam cystoplasty. Nine of 16 females had a poor result from a clam procedure. In 3 the problem lay with self-catheterisation difficulties. One each had persistent hyper-reflexia and sphincter incontinence. Four had hyper-reflexia on sexual intercourse. Overall, 42% of females had problems from the retained bladder segment. Seven patients had continent urinary diversions. The results were good, although 2 Kock nipples required revision. Surgery was well tolerated. There was a 21% re-operation rate for complications. Pre-operative investigation correctly predicted sphincter competence and the need for self-catheterisation in 79 and 86% respectively.     

Primary exchange revision arthroplasty for infected total knee replacement: a long-term study

Infected knee replacement is a serious complication that requires significant hospital-based resources for successful management. A successful primary exchange revision technique offers decreased morbidity for the patient by eliminating a second major operation and associated hospitalization, which in turn substantially reduces the cost associated with this dreaded condition. Twenty-two consecutive infected primary total knee arthroplasties in 22 patients were treated with primary exchange revision arthroplasties using antibiotic-impregnated cement. The surgical technique consisted of excision of draining sinuses, complete synovectomy, removal of granulation tissue, and debulking of the extensor mechanism. Postoperative treatment consisted of 4 to 6 weeks of parenterally administered antibiotics and 6 to 12 months of orally administered antibiotics. Both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms were treated. At an average follow-up of 10.2 years (range, 1.4 to 19.6 years), 90.9% were free of recurrent infection. Knee scores averaged 79.5, with 85.7% good or excellent results. The physiological classification of the host appeared to influence the outcome of revision. All patients in class A or B (20 knees) had successful eradication of their primary infection after 1-stage revision, whereas the only failure in the group was a physiological class C patient, who eventually expired from ongoing end-organ liver failure. These results compare most favorably with those of delayed-exchange revision arthroplasty while providing a more cost-effective management program.     

Glenoid Reconstruction in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty

Failed shoulder arthroplasty associated with glenoid bony deficiency is a difficult problem. Revision surgery is complex with unpredictable outcome. We asked whether revision shoulder arthroplasty with glenoid bone grafting could lead to good outcome. We retrospectively reviewed 21 patients who underwent glenoid bone grafting using corticocancellous bone grafting or impaction grafting using cancellous bone graft. Three patients underwent revision TSA, five patients hemiarthroplasty, 10 patients hemiarthroplasty with biologic resurfacing of the glenoid, and three patients revision to reverse TSA. The patients had minimum 25 months followup (average, 45 months; range, 25-92 months). All patients had improvement in their range of motion and the Constant-Murley score. Most improvement occurred in patients with glenoid reimplantation. Patients who underwent revision reverse TSA had improvement in shoulder flexion but decrease in external rotation motion. We conclude revision shoulder arthroplasty with glenoid bone grafting can produce good short-term outcome and glenoid component reinsertion should be attempted whenever possible.     

胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的长期随访

目的 :为了观察胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的远期治疗效果。方法 :作者随访了 1988～ 1997年10年间在新加坡中央医院行胫骨高位截骨术的 438名 (486膝 )膝关节骨关节炎的患者。结果 :手术后 5年内的优良率为 88.5 % ,手术后 5～ 10年的优良率为 6 1.9%。但在手术后仍有 18.9%的患者因治疗效果的下降须再次手术置换人工膝关节。结论 :我们认为胫骨高位截骨术虽然是治疗膝关节骨关节炎的一种有效手段 ,但远期仍有一部分患者因治疗效果下降须再次手术。     

Cemented total knee arthroplasty for gonarthrosis in patients 55 years old or younger

The results of 68 cemented total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in 50 patients with gonarthrosis who were 55 years old or younger at the time of surgery were reviewed. These patients were operated on between 1979 and 1987 and were followed for an average of 6.2 years. The average age of the patients was 50 years. Patients were evaluated by the Hospital for Special Surgery knee score. The average preoperative score was 53, and the average follow-up score was 90. Overall, 55 TKAs were rated as excellent and 13 as good. Using the knee rating score advocated by the Knee Society, the average postoperative score was 92 for pain and 84 for function. There were four successful reoperations for patellar component loosening, all in metal-backed patellae. The femoral and tibial components in these patients were intact, and at the follow-up period, two knees were rated as excellent and two as good. Detailed roentgenographic evaluation demonstrated that 20% of tibial components had radiolucencies in at least one zone on the anteroposterior roentgenogram and in 11% on the lateral roentgenogram. Femoral radiolucencies occurred in only 2% of knees. Patellar radiolucencies in one or more zones occurred in 20% of knees that had not had patellar revision. No complete or progressive radiolucencies at the bone-cement interface were noted for any component, and no components were considered to be roentgenographically loose. Cemented TKAs can achieve excellent long-term results in patients younger than 55 years old with gonarthrosis of the knee. These results compare with those obtained in published reports on older age groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Disease Progression After Unicompartmental Arthroplasty: Add a Compartment or Revise to Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundFive percent to 7% of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) require revision for disease progression in untreated compartment(s), most commonly to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). TKA requires removal of bone and usually the anterior cruciate ligament. Preserving the UKA and converting to a bicompartmental arthroplasty (BCA) by performing a second UKA is an alternative.MethodsThe results of 73 UKA-BCA patients were compared to 75 patients treated by UKA-TKA revision. Knee Society, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement, and patient satisfaction scores were collected by a blinded therapist. Patients were asked about their implant preference and recovery. Twenty-two UKA-BCA revision patients had a UKA (6) or TKA (16) in the contralateral knee; thus, a direct comparison of UKA-BCA to both UKA and TKA was possible.ResultsOf the UKA-BCA patients, 69 (94%) had excellent or good, 2 (3%) fair, and 2 (3%) poor outcomes with 1 patient requiring revision to TKA. Of patients with a TKA in the contralateral knee, 13 (81%) preferred the UKA-BCA replacement and 3 (19%) preferred the TKA. All patients said the UKA-BCA revision recovery was similar or easier than their initial UKA. Of UKA-TKA revisions, 59 (79%) had excellent or good, 9 (12%) fair, and 7 (9%) poor outcomes. There was 1 wound infection and 1 re-revision in the UKA-BCA group and 1 wound infection and 3 re-revisions in the UKA-TKA group. The Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement and Knee Society Scores were better for UKA-BCA compared to UKA-TKA.ConclusionUKA-BCA is a successful treatment for disease progression following UKA.     

Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup

We evaluated implant survivorship, reoperation rates, and complication rates of a group of patients who had total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented prosthetic device using cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs at 5 to 8 years followup. Three hundred thirty-four consecutive primary total knee arthroplasties (186 cruciate retaining and 148 posterior stabilized) were done in 287 patients at our institution during a 2-year period. Kaplan Meier survivorship using revision for any reason and revision for aseptic loosening as endpoints were 95.9% and 99.5% respectively at 8 years. Nine patients (four with cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties, five with posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties; 3.1%) had reoperations for any reason. No patients had reoperation for problems related to the patellofemoral joint. Thirty-two patients (11.1%) had intraoperative or postoperative complications. There were no differences in any of the outcomes analyzed between patients who had cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized total knee replacements. Our results show that with appropriate patient selection and meticulous attention to surgical technique, excellent clinical and radiographic results can be achieved with a third-generation total knee arthroplasty system at intermediate followup.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study).