Efficacy of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Cardiovascular Disease

The cardiovascular continuum describes the progression of pathophysiologic events from cardiovascular risk factors to symptomatic cardiovascular disease (CVD) and life-threatening events. Pharmacologic intervention early in the continuum may prevent or slow CVD development and improve quality of life. The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) is central to the pathophysiology of CVD at many stages of the continuum. Numerous clinical trials of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have shown that RAAS blockade provides benefits to patients across the continuum. ARBs are as effective as ACE inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension; however tolerability and adherence to therapy appear to be improved with ARBs. Large clinical trials have shown that ARBs may provide therapeutic benefits beyond blood pressure control in patients with diabetes, heart failure or at risk of heart failure following a myocardial infarction. In addition, ARBs have been shown to provide protective effects in patients with impaired renal function or left ventricular hypertrophy. Additional clinical trials are ongoing to further characterize the role of ARBs in CVD management.     

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy to reduce cardiovascular events in high-risk patients: Part 1

Cardiovascular disease is understood as a continuum; risk factors induce a pathophysiologic cascade that culminates in end-organ failure. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) influences multiple aspects of the pathophysiology via hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic effects. Many long-term clinical trials provide overwhelming evidence of benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) across the cardiovascular continuum, including benefits regarding hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, renal disease, and heart failure. Trials also indicate additive or synergistic effects of combination therapy in renal disease and heart failure, a possibility supported by the basic biochemistry of the agents. Discussion of these trials is included in part 1 of this 2-part review. Part 2 of the review will discuss the extensive interaction of the RAS with the cellular and molecular pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease and the cross-continuum effects of ARBs and ACE inhibitors, which raise the possibility that RAS inhibition can offer protection in high-risk patients who do not have symptoms. The benefits of combined ACE inhibitor/ARB therapy in high-risk patients await confirmation; ongoing clinical research in this area will be discussed.     

Angiotensin II type I receptor blocker and endothelial function in humans: role of nitric oxide and oxidative stress

Recent large clinical trials have shown that angiotensin II type I receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and hypertension. However, the mechanism underlying antiatherogenic effects of ARBs remains unclear. The vascular endothelium is involved in the release of various vasodilators, including nitric oxide (NO), prostacyclin, and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor as well as vasoconstrictors. NO plays an important role in the regulation of vascular tone, the inhibition of platelet aggregation, and the suppression of smooth muscle cell proliferation. Several investigators have reported impairment in endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the forearm, coronary, and renal vasculature in cardiovascular diseases, including hypertensive patients. Cardiovascular diseases are associated with alteration in endothelial function. Endothelial dysfunction is the initial step in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Anti-renin-angiotensin system agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors improve endothelial function in patients with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease. It is well known that ACE inhibitors augment endothelium-dependent vasodilation through an increase in NO bioavailability, by an increase in NO production and a decrease in NO inactivation. ARBs are also thought to prevent cardiovascular complications through an augmentation of endothelial function. In this review, we focus on recent findings and putative mechanisms of the beneficial effects of ARBs on endothelial function.     

Angiotensin receptor blockers: evidence for preserving target organs

Hypertension is a major problem throughout the developed world. Although current antihypertensive treatment regimens reduce morbidity and mortality, patients are often noncompliant, and medications may not completely normalize blood pressure. As a result, current therapy frequently does not prevent or reverse the cardiovascular remodeling that often occurs when blood pressure is chronically elevated. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is effective in controlling hypertension and treating congestive heart failure. Both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) inhibit the activity of the RAS, but these two classes of antihypertensive medications have different mechanisms of action and different pharmacologic profiles. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors block a single pathway in the production of angiotensin II (Ang II). In addition, angiotensin I is not the only substrate for ACE. The ACE inhibitors also block the degradation of bradykinin that may have potential benefits in cardiovascular disease. Bradykinin is, however, the presumed cause of cough associated with ACE inhibitor therapy. Data from clinical trials on ACE inhibitors serve to support the involvement of the RAS in the development of cardiovascular disease. Angiotensin receptor blockers act distally in the RAS to block the Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptor selectively. Thus, ARBs are more specific agents and avoid many side effects. Experimental and clinical trials have documented the efficacy of ARBs in preserving target-organ function and reversing cardiovascular remodeling. In some instances, maximal benefit may be obtained with Ang II blockade using both ARBs and ACE inhibitors. This review describes clinical trials that document the efficacy of ARBs in protecting the myocardium, blood vessels, and renal vasculature.     

Modulating atherosclerosis through inhibition or blockade of angiotensin

Angiotensin-convertng enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are well recognized for their benefits in treating hypertension and congestive heart failure and preventing postmyocardial infarction heart failure or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Recently, blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor was shown to reduce cardiovascular events in hypertensive subjects with LV hypertrophy. Several lines of evidence are now converging to show that ACE inhibitors may affect the atherosclerotic process itself. Emerging clinical data indicate that angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) may possibly modulate atherosclerosis as well. The antiatherogenic properties of ACE inhibitors and ARBs may derive from inhibition or blockade of angiotensin II, now recognized as an agent that increases oxidative stress.Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin-receptor blockade also increase endothelial nitric oxide formation, which improves endothelial function. In contrast to the effects of ARBs, the vascular effects of ACE inhibitors may, in part, be mediated by an increase in bradykinin. This article reviews some of the biologic mechanisms whereby ACE inhibitors and ARBs may modulate atherosclerosis.     

Prevention of macrovascular disease in type 2 diabetic patients: blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system

Type 2 diabetes is reaching epidemic proportions throughout the world, which has major health implications as such patients have considerably increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is involved in a wide range of adverse effects that contribute to the pathogenesis of CHD in diabetic patients, including vascular haemodynamic regulation, oxidative stress and hypertrophy of vascular cells. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used in clinical practice. In diabetic patients ACE inhibitors and ARBs both effectively lower blood pressure, particularly in combination with low-dose thiazide diuretics, and may be considered first line therapies in the treatment of diabetic hypertension. Additionally they have important renoprotective actions independent of their blood pressure-lowering action, which is of particular benefit in diabetic patients, who are at increased risk of developing nephropathy. ARBs are generally well tolerated, but ACE inhibitor therapy is associated with some side effects such as cough and both may result in hyperkalaemia. Blockade of the RAAS with these agents appears to play an important role not only in protecting from renal disease, but it may also help to reduce morbidity and mortality from certain vascular diseases in diabetic patients.     

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Hypertension: To Use or Not to Use?

Most guidelines for the management of patients with cardiovascular disease recommend angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors as first-choice therapy, whereas angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are merely considered an alternative for ACE inhibitor–intolerant patients. The aim of this review was to compare outcomes and adverse events between ACE inhibitors and ARBs in patients. In patients with hypertension and hypertension with compelling indications, we found no difference in efficacy between ARBs and ACE inhibitors with regard to the surrogate endpoint of blood pressure and outcomes of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, and end-stage renal disease. However, ACE inhibitors remain associated with cough and a very low risk of angioedema and fatalities. Overall withdrawal rates because of adverse events are lower with ARBs than with ACE inhibitors. Given the equal outcome efficacy but fewer adverse events with ARBs, risk-to-benefit analysis in aggregate indicates that at present there is little, if any, reason to use ACE inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension or its compelling indications.     

Pleiotropic Effects of Inhibitors of the RAAS in the Diabetic Population: Above and Beyond Blood Pressure Lowering

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are indispensable therapeutic agents for treating hypertension and proteinuria in patients with diabetes mellitus. Studies have shown that the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has effects on various organ systems, including the central nervous system, heart, and kidneys. Angiotensin II has major deleterious effects on vascular compliance, vascular relaxation, and plasma markers of inflammation, which are surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease. Evidence is established from major trials that ACE inhibitors and ARB therapy improve these surrogate markers and reduce cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and stroke. Accumulating evidence also supports the newer class of medication, the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren, as beneficial in hypertensive persons with diabetes mellitus. In this article, we review the mechanisms through which inhibitors of the RAAS benefit persons with hypertension and decrease the development of cardiovascular and renal disease above and beyond blood pressure lowering.     

Tissue angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors: Are they more effective than serum angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors?

Since their discovery in the 1980s, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to decrease angiotensin formation, prevent breakdown of bradykinin, and may also act on peptides of the renin-angiotensin system. They are effective in reducing the risk of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and death from cardiovascular causes in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction or heart failure, and have been shown to reduce atherosclerotic complications in patients who have vascular disease without heart failure. They may preserve endothelial function and counteract initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. Broadly, ACE inhibitors can be divided into tissue specific or serum ACE inhibitors. Tissue-specific ACE inhibitors as a group are not superior to serum ACE inhibitors in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Pending direct comparator clinical trials between a tissue ACE inhibitor and a plasma ACE inhibitor, both ramipril and perindopril can be recommended for secondary risk prevention, based on the evidence.     

Hypertension mega-trials with cardiovascular end points: effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers

Background

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system has a pivotal role in the short- and long-term regulation of blood pressure through its principal mediator, angiotensin II. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) decrease the deleterious effects of angiotensin II on the vasculature and heart, but have different mechanisms of action. Although the blood pressure-lowering effect of ACE inhibitors and ARBs is equivalent to that of most other antihypertensive agents, emerging data suggest that these drug classes may have a greater effect on decreasing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates in specific patient populations.

Methods

We reviewed large (approximately ≥5000 patients) hypertension clinical trials using ACE inhibitors and ARBs and with cardiovascular morbidity/mortality end points.

Results

Six trials of ACE inhibitors and 5 trials of ARBs (3 completed, 2 ongoing) were selected for this analysis. Data from these hypertension mega-trials suggest that ACE inhibitors and ARBs may decrease cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, and left ventricular hypertrophy. However, some trials showed important blood-pressure differences and are therefore partly inconclusive for particular drug effects.

Conclusions

Analysis of recently reported and ongoing mega-trials of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors may support the notion that their vasculoprotective properties confer greater benefit by virtue of their effects beyond blood-pressure reduction. Results from trials that will be completed in the next few years may provide further support of blocking the renin-angiotensin-system in cardiovascular protection in the management of hypertension.     

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockade for cardiovascular disease prevention

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a significant role in pathophysiology of multiple disease states. RAAS blockade is beneficial in patients with hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, chronic heart failure, stroke, and diabetic renal disease. RAAS blockade with the combination angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has demonstrated conflicting results in recent clinical trials. This article reviews the latest evidence of isolated ACEI or ARB use, their combination, and the role of aldosterone blockers and direct renin inhibitors in patients at risk, and makes recommendations for their use in the prevention of morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular disease.     

Meta-analysis of randomized trials of angioedema as an adverse event of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors

Angioedema is a rare, potentially life-threatening adverse event of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. The objective of the present study was to determine the risk of angioedema from randomized clinical trials. A PubMed/CENTRAL/EMBASE search was made for randomized clinical trials from 1980 to October 2011 in patients on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), or direct renin inhibitor (DRI). Trials with a total number of patients ≥100 and a duration of ≥8 weeks were included for analysis. Incidence of angioedema was pooled by weighing the incident rate of each trial by the inverse of the variance. Twenty-six trials with 74,857 patients in the ACE inhibitor arm with 232,523 person-years of follow-up, 19 trials with 35,479 patients on ARB with 122,293 person-years of follow-up, and 2 trials with 5,141 patients on DRI with 1,735 person-years of follow-up met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. In head-to-head comparison in 7 trials, risk of angioedema with ACE inhibitors was 2.2 times higher than with ARBs (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 3.3). With ACE inhibitors and ARBs, incidence of angioedema was higher in heart failure trials compared to hypertension or coronary artery disease trials without heart failure (p <0.0001). Weighted incidence of angioedema with ACE inhibitors was 0.30% (95% CI 0.28 to 0.32) compared to 0.11% (95% CI 0.09 to 0.13) with ARBs, 0.13% (95% CI 0.08 to 0.19) with DRIs, and 0.07% with placebo (95% CI 0.05 to 0.09). In conclusion, incidence of angioedema with ARBs and DRI was <1/2 than that with ACE inhibitors and not significantly different from placebo. Incidence of angioedema was higher in patients with heart failure compared to those without heart failure with ACE inhibitors and ARBs.     

Role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in atrial fibrillation and cardiac remodeling

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes recent clinical trial evidence showing a reduction in the development and recurrence of atrial fibrillation with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor-blocking agents (ARBs). It then explores the possible mechanisms for this effect based on current animal models and limited human study. RECENT FINDINGS: Post hoc analyses of trials in patients with heart failure, hypertension, or myocardial infarction have observed reductions in atrial fibrillation among patients treated with ACE inhibitors or ARBs. Recent studies of these agents in animal models of atrial fibrillation suggest that they may prevent atrial fibrillation by reversing the cardiac structural and electrical changes, known as cardiac remodeling, that lead to the development of atrial fibrillation. This concept is also supported by two prospective studies showing that ACE inhibitors and ARBs prevent the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion. SUMMARY: Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is a novel concept for the treatment of atrial fibrillation that may target the underlying substrate of atrial fibrillation. Further human research is required to determine whether ACE inhibitors and ARBs prevent atrial fibrillation, and if so, whether this is a result of blood pressure lowering alone or a specific effect of these agents. Ongoing research will establish whether ACE inhibitors or ARBs have specific benefits in patients with atrial fibrillation.     

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers for prevention of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in preventing the new onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a public health problem of epidemic proportions and its prevalence is on the rise. The typical American born today has a one in three chance of developing type 2 diabetes. This diagnosis is associated with an adverse cardiovascular prognosis and is considered the risk equivalent of established coronary disease. Even in high-risk individuals, diabetes is a preventable disease. Several studies have shown that ACE inhibitors and ARBs decrease the incidence of new-onset type 2 diabetes. However, the exact role of these agents in diabetes prevention has not yet been fully elucidated. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled clinical trials of ACE inhibitors or ARBs, identified through a MEDLINE search and a review of reports from scientific meetings, to study the efficacy of these medications in diabetes prevention. RESULTS: This showed that ACE inhibitors and ARBs were associated with reductions in the incidence of newly diagnosed diabetes by 27% and 23%, respectively, and by 25% in the pooled analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an ACE inhibitor or ARB should be considered in patients with pre-diabetic conditions such as metabolic syndrome, hypertension, impaired fasting glucose, family history of diabetes, obesity, congestive heart failure, or coronary heart disease.     

Vascular protective effects of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists: Theoretical basis for a combination therapy in hypertension and other cardiovasular diseases

Hypertension is an important cardiovascular risk factor. High blood pressure per se is not a disease but a hemodynamic alteration associated with vascular disease. Two classes of drugs are especially effective in lowering blood pressure and preventing cardiovascular complications, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium antagonists. The hemdynamic effects of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists are complementary. While ACE inhibitors inhibit the renin-angiotensin system and reduce sympathetic outflow, calcium antagonists dilate large conduit and resistance arteries. Certain calcium antagonists, such as verapamil, lower heart rate. In the blood vessel wall, the local vascular effects of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists are also complementary. While ACE inhibitors inhibit activation of angiotensin I into angiotensin II and prevent the breakdown of bradykinin (which stimulates nitric oxide and prostacyclin formation), calcium antagonists inhibit the effects of vasoconstrictor hormones such as angiotensin II at the level of vascular smooth muscle by reducing calcium inflow and facilitating the vasodilator effects of nitric oxide. Calcium antagonists reduce smooth muscle cell proliferation and atherosclerosis. In hypertensive animals, verapamil and trandolapril normalize endothelial dysfunction. In large angiographic trials, nifedipine and nicardipine reduced the development of new atherosclerotic plaques. After myocardial infarction, verapamil reduces mortality and cardiac events in patients without heart failure. In contrast, ACE inhibitors are effective after myocardial infarction in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Urinary albumin excretion rate decreases during ACE inhibitor therapy or with a calcium antagonist such as verapamil; combination of the two drugs has an additive effect. In resistance arteries, hypertension is associated with an increased media/lumen ratio. ACE inhibitors, but not beta-blockers, markedly improve these structural changes. In summary, ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists have a complementary profile, both in their hemodynamic and local vascular action. Hence, combination therapy with these two classes of drugs appears particularly useful in patients with hypertension, not only to lower blood pressure, but hopefully to achieve improved cardiovascular protection.     

Update in pharmacologic treatment of hypertension.

Initial pharmacologic therapy for hypertension is low-dose thiazide diuretics, beta-blockers, and ACE inhibitors. Increasing data have confirmed that ACE inhibitors have specific benefit in patients with diabetes, atherosclerosis, left ventricular dysfunction, and renal insufficiency. CCBs are alternative agents for ISH in the elderly and appear to decrease stroke with perhaps less protection against progression of renal insufficiency and proteinuria, CAD mortality and new onset heart failure versus other initial agents, especially ACE inhibitors. ARBs are well tolerated and effective blood pressure lowering agents but have not been confirmed as effective as ACE inhibitors for reducing renal progression, clinical events, or mortality from heart failure. Effective pharmacologic antihypertensive therapy may avoid disabling and undetected cerebrovascular disease, cognitive dysfunction, and disturbing symptoms of elevated blood pressure. Vasopeptidase inhibitor, such as omapatrilat, and endothelin-1 antagonist, such as bosentan, may become future agents approved for the reduction of morbidity and mortality with hypertension. The ALLHAT trial continues to examine the potential benefits and harms of amlodipine versus chlorthalidone and lisinopril in a diverse high-risk population. Based on ALLHAT data, however, doxazosin is no longer an acceptable initial pharmacological agent. Intensive pharmacologic treatment with blood pressure lowering to less than 130/85 mm Hg is recommended with diabetes, renal insufficiency, and heart failure with additional goal of less than 125/75 mm Hg with renal failure and proteinuria greater than 1 g/24 h, based on multiple outcome studies.     

The renin angiotensin system as a therapeutic target to prevent diabetes and its complications

The role of the RAAS in development and maintenance of blood pressure is well established.In addition, the deleterious effects of angiotensin II on the heart, vasculature, and kidneys have been clearly defined. There seems to be a close relationship between endothelial dysfunction, insulin resistance (a precursor to diabetes and coronary artery disease) and angiotensin II. The signaling pathways for insulin in the vascular wall interacts with the angiotensin signaling, giving rise to potential mechanisms for development of diabetes and resulting harmful effects. A large number of clinical trials using ACE inhibitors or ARBs have shown significant reduction in secondary endpoints in the development of new onset of diabetes. Ongoing prospective studies involving ARBs (eg, the Nateglinide and Valsartan Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research trial) and ACE inhibitors (eg, the Diabetes Re-duction Assessment with Ramipril and Rosiglita-zone Medication trial) are testing the ability of certain agents to prevent type 2 diabetes. In the meantime, it is important to recognize insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome as entities that increase the risk for cardiovascular disease. In addition to lifestyle modifications, managing endothelial dysfunction and protecting the vasculature will help prevent diabetes and cardiovascular disease.     

Comparison of various blood pressure lowering treatments on the primary prevention of cardiovascular outcomes in recent randomised clinical trials

Randomised clinical trials completed over the past 8 to 10 years have provided much new evidence regarding the cardiovascular risks and benefits of treatment with newer blood pressure lowering drugs, particularly ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCB). Trials of active treatment against placebo have now established that ACE inhibitors and CCBs reduce the risk of coronary heat disease and stroke in subjects with elevated blood pressure and that ACE inhibitors reduce the risk of heart failure but calcium antagonists do not. Clinical trials comparing active treatment regimens based on different blood pressure lowering drug classes, have provided convincing evidence that ACE inhibitors, CCBs, and "conventional treatment" with diuretics/beta-blockers are equally effective in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease, but that minor differences of the order of 5-12% favouring calcium antagonists may exist. The one area with a major difference is again for the primary prevention of heart failure where calcium antagonists are clearly inferior to diuretics/ beta-blockers and to ACE inhibitors. There is now convincing evidence that blood pressure lowering is effective in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular outcomes in subjects with established coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes and chronic kidney disease, especially diabetic nephropathy. Clinical trial evidence comprising regimens based on different drug classes for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular outcomes is still very limited. It is possible that longer differences will be found between the efficacy and safety of drugs in secondary prevention than have been reported so far in primary prevention.     

Vascular effects of systemic hypertension.

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, including coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, renal failure, and aortic aneurysms. It is also a potent promoter of atherosclerosis. Observational studies have shown a linear relationship between a wide range of blood pressures and the risk for CAD and stroke. Clinical trials have indicated that hypertension reduction leads to the predicted reduction in stroke incidence, but that CAD incidence is affected to a lesser extent than predicted. The modest effect of traditional antihypertensive drugs on CAD may be due to several factors, including failure to reverse well-established coronary atherosclerosis, particularly if multiple risk factors are not reduced as well. Metabolic side effects of antihypertensive drugs or excessive lowering of blood pressure leading to inadequate myocardial perfusion, especially in patients with increased left ventricular (LV) mass, also may play important roles. Hypertension is a major cause of renal failure, particularly in black males, but control of the hypertension does not necessarily prevent deterioration of renal function. Increased glomerular pressure is thought to play a causative role in the development of renal failure in hypertensive and diabetic patients. Antihypertensive drugs may have a direct effect on the arterial wall, which may be independent of their antihypertensive action. Beta-adrenergic blockers, calcium antagonists, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors inhibit the development of vascular lesions in response to hypercholesterolemia or to iatrogenic balloon injury, but the clinical importance of these observations remains to be determined.     

The role of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular disease

Pharmacologic attenuation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) either through angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition or angiotensin II receptor blockade now occupies a central role in the management of hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, and cardiovascular and renal disease. Although our understanding and use of these agents has expanded significantly over the past decade, the relative and differential benefits of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are still not entirely clear. The data continue to support the first-line use of ACE inhibitors for all indications. Results for combination ACE inhibitor and ARB therapy in clinical outcome trials have been disappointing and do not support its use. New strategies for RAAS modulation bring hope for further progress in the treatment of hypertensive and cardiovascular disease.