Trumping professional roles: collaboration of nurse practitioners and physicians for a better U.S. health care system

Professional turf battles have yielded variations in the scope of practice for nurse practitioners (NPs) that obstruct collaboration with physicians that would enhance patient care. Patients would be better served if NPs and physicians worked together to develop better combined models of education and service that take advantage of the benefits of both professions' contributions to care.     

Family physician/nurse practitioner: stories of collaboration

AIMS: This paper presents the experiences of nurse practitioners and family physicians working in collaborative practice at four Canadian rural primary care agencies. It focuses on the qualitative segment of a larger study examining the impact of an educational intervention on interprofessional practice. BACKGROUND: Growing awareness of the importance of health promotion and disease prevention, the increased complexity of community-based care, and the need to use scarce human healthcare resources, especially family physicians, far more efficiently and effectively, have resulted in increased emphasis on primary healthcare renewal in Canada. Key to primary healthcare renewal is care delivery through interdisciplinary teams that include nurse practitioners. METHODS: Narrative analysis, a form of interpretive analysis that respects the integrity of the stories told by participants, was chosen as the strategy to examine the narrative data gathered in two sets of interviews with the nurse practitioners and family physicians. The study was undertaken during 2000. RESULTS: Thirteen family physicians and five nurse practitioners with diverse educational backgrounds and varied experience with collaboration participated in the qualitative component of the study. A number of issues related to working in a shared practice were identified in nurse practitioner and family physician interviews across the research sites. The themes identified in participants' stories included issues related to the scope of practice, emphasizing the importance of role clarity and trust, the ideological difference regarding disease prevention and health promotion, differences in perceptions about the operation of collaborative practice, and the understanding that collaborative relationships evolve. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of nurse practitioners and family physicians in a common clinical practice without some form of orientation process does not produce collaborative practice. Educational strategies related to role expectations are necessary to facilitate the development of care delivery partnerships characterized by interdependent practice.     

Nurses' and physicians' performance on clinical simulation test: hypertension.

The purposes of this study were to determine whether nurse practitioners with a master's degree (NPM), nurse practitioners with a certificate (NPC), and public health nurses (PHN) perform as proficiently as family practice physicians (FPP) in assessing and managing essential hypertension and whether the four groups use a psychosocial or pathophysiological model in providing care. Subjects included 30 FPPs, 30 NPMs, 33 NPCs, and 40 PHNs. A clinical simulation test required subjects to collect data, identify problems, interpret tests, and formulate care plans. Criterion test performance was established by eight expert nurses and physicians. Physicians and nurse practitioners were equally proficient, and public health nurses were significantly less proficient on only 3 of 11 test sections. Sharpest contrasts were in test interpretation, with FPPs clearly more expert. FPPs practice style was less psychosocial but not more pathophysiological than that of the nurse practitioners. The study suggests that, except for nurses greater use of a psychosocial model, expanded role nurses and physicians perform similarly in assessing and managing hypertension and that, with slightly more training, PHNs could perform comparably.     

Nurse Practitioners: Reevaluation of the Need for and Willingness to Hire by Nurse Administrators, Nurse Practitioners, and Physicians

A survey of all nurse administrators and advanced practice nurses and a simple random sample survey of licensed physicians in Nevada were completed to reevaluate the perceived need for and willingness to hire nurse practitioners (NPs). The reevaluation was deemed necessary based on a similar survey that was completed by these authors in 1990. At that time significant questions were raised concerning the lack of understanding of the role of NPs in and their contribution to the health care team.
The results of the study clearly indicate that the unique contributions of the NP to the health care team should be further publicized and clarified. In addition, for some physicians, a significant disparity continues to exist between the optimal, collaborative role and the more readily accepted dependent role of the NP. The family NP (FNP) continues to be the most desired specialty for those who hire NPs.     

A nurse practitioner model of practice in the neonatal intensive care unit

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the practice of the nurse practitioner (NP) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in an attempt to define an advanced practice nursing model that is unique to NP practice in the NICU. DESIGN: This qualitative research used an ethnographic case study design to answer the research question: 'What is the practice model of nurse practitioners working in the NICU?' METHODS: Seven nurse practitioners working in five level II/III NICUs in Massachusetts and Rhode Island were interviewed and observed in practice. Audiotaped interviews using open-ended questions and field notes from participant observations were analyzed for patterns of behavior. RESULTS: These nurse practitioners practiced within a model of advanced practice nursing that emphasized health, holism, and caring within the highly technological and medical NICU environment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A model of NP practice in the NICU is emerging and needs further development and testing. Nurse educators and administrators must find ways to support the nursing model in the advanced practice nursing role in the NICU. Nurse practitioners need to be more active in promoting a clearer understanding of their practice and contributions to the NICU care delivery team.     

Comparing HMO physicians' attitudes towards NPs and PAs

This study examined the attitudes of physicians working in health maintenance organizations toward the use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants. It also explored some of the underlying reasons for these attitudes: effect upon quality of care, risk of malpractice, role threat and gender bias. The setting was a health maintenance organization serving 270,000 members. The data were derived from a survey of physicians' attitudes and behavior. Physicians from internal medicine, pediatrics and obstetrics-gynecology were the study population. Internists and pediatricians had favorable attitudes toward both nurse practitioners and physician assistants. Obstetrician-gynecologists had somewhat less favorable attitudes. Physicians in all three specialties favored nurse practitioners more than physician assistants. Physicians felt that nurse practitioners were more likely to increase the quality of care and less likely to increase the risk of malpractice. Nurse practitioners were not seen as a greater role threat. Some gender bias appeared to be present, but it did not appear to constrain the use of nurse practitioners. Large, multi-specialty, prepaid group practice health maintenance organizations may be favorable settings for nurse practitioners and physician assistants to practice primary care.     

Collaboration between pharmacists,physicians and nurse practitioners: A qualitative investigation of working relationships in the inpatient medical setting

While collaborative, team-based care has the potential to improve medication use and reduce adverse drug events and cost, less attention is paid to understanding the processes of well functioning teams. This paper presents the findings from key informant interviews and reflective journaling from pharmacists, physicians and nurse practitioners participating in a multicentre, controlled clinical trial of team-based pharmacist care in hospitalized medical patients. A phenomenological approach guided the data analysis and content analysis was the primary tool for unitizing, categorizing and identifying emerging themes. Pharmacists experienced highs (developing trusting relationships and making positive contributions to patient care) and lows (struggling with documentation and workload) during integration into the medical care team. From the perspective of the participating pharmacists, nurse practitioners and physicians, the integration of pharmacists into the teams was felt to have facilitated positive patient outcomes by improving team drug-therapy decision-making, continuity of care and patient safety. Additionally, the study increased the awareness of all team members' potential roles so that pharmacists, nurses and physicians could play a part in and benefit from working together as a team. Focussed attention on how practice is structured, team process and ongoing support would enable successful implementation of team-based care in a larger context. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00351676)     

Nurse practitioner liability and authority

Nurse practitioners are being held to a higher professional standard. No longer can nurses assume that their practice is protected by physicians and hospitals. Current trends indicate that nurse practitioners are accountable for their actions and are liable for malpractice. Legislation regulating the practice of nurse practitioners varies from state to state; differing opinions among nurses, physicians, and legislators account for some of these variances. The ultimate goal of the health care professions is the delivery of safe, effective, cost-efficient health care. Nurse practitioners are helping to achieve this goal.     

Components Necessary in a Successful Nurse Practitioner-Physician Collaborative Practice

In recent years, collaborative practice has gained much attention from nurse practitioners in primary health care settings. This is because many nurse practitioners feel that nurse practitioners and physicians can complement each other's roles. Together, they can provide more comprehensive, quality primary health care than either profession can provide by itself. Nurse practitioners and physicians working together to care for a common group of patients may have varying degrees of collaboration in their practice. This article discusses some elements and components necessary to maximize the quality and extent of collaboration.     

Canada's health care system provides lessons for NPs.

With increasing economic pressures, swaying public opinion and new government policies rationing health care resources, nurses in Canada are again challenging physicians for room to practice as nurse practitioners. Although the last Canadian nurse practitioner program was discontinued in 1983, and it was argued that the death of the role was inevitable in Canada's health care system, nurse practitioners have not vanished. Social plans in the United States are drawing heavily on the Canadian model of universal access and a government-funded health care system, and dramatic changes are taking place in Ontario's health care system. Now more than ever it is important that nurse practitioners understand Canada's health care system, why the NP role in Ontario has not been highly successful, and why the time is right for reintroduction of nurse practitioners into Ontario's health care system.     

Ambulatory care centers: a unique opportunity for nurse practitioners

Nurse practitioners continue to struggle to find avenues for professional fulfillment. Urgent care or ambulatory care centers (ACCs) may, because of their need to respond to consumer demands for more comprehensive services, offer nurse practitioners a unique opportunity to establish productive primary care practices based on the concepts of total patient care. A model for such a practice has operated successfully since 1983, establishing that both professional and business success can result from the collaborative efforts of nurse practitioners and physicians in an ACC setting.     

Satisfaction With Practice in a Rural State: Perceptions of Nurse Practitioners and Nurse Midwives

Data from nurse practitioners and certified nurse midwive are used to explore contributions to primary care in a rural state and how regulatory restrictiveness and other factors affect satisfaction with practice ( N = 151). Satisfaction is high, especially with home communities and professional aspects of work, including collaboration with physicians. However, many feel limited by regulations and are less satisfied, especially those with a master's degree and those in organizational versus office practice sites. Reducing restrictive regulations, reevaluating practice structures, and providing for full scope of practice and other incentives consistent with rising educational levels can increase access to care.     

Weight management practices among primary care providers

This pilot study examined how primary care providers manage patients with weight problems, an important component of primary care. A convenience sample of 17 nurse practitioners and 15 physicians were surveyed about assessments and interventions used in practice for weight management along with perceived barriers to providing effective weight management. Practice patterns between gender, profession and practice setting of the nurse practitioners were compared.     

Perceptions of physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists about the role of acute care nurse practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Information about the contributions of acute care nurse practitioners to medical management teams in critical care settings is limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine contributions of acute care nurse practitioners to medical management of critically ill patients from the perspectives of 3 disciplines: medicine, respiratory care, and nursing. METHODS: Attending physicians, respiratory therapists, and nurses in 2 intensive care units were asked to list 3 advantages and 3 disadvantages of collaborative care provided by acute care nurse practitioners. Qualitative methods (coding/constant comparative analysis) were used to identify common themes and subthemes. Overall response rate was 35% (from 69% for attending physicians to 26% for nurses). RESULTS: Responses were grouped into 4 main themes: accessibility, competence/knowledge, care coordination/communication, and system issues. Acute care nurse practitioners were valued for their accessibility, expertise in routine daily management of patients, and ability to meet patient/family needs, especially for "long-stay" patients. Also, they were respected for their commitment to providing quality care and for their communication skills, exemplified through teaching of nursing staff, patient/family involvement, and fluency in weaning protocols. Physicians valued acute care nurse practitioners' continuity of care, patient/family focus, and commitment. Nurses valued their accessibility, commitment, and patient/family focus. Respiratory therapists valued their accessibility, commitment, and consistency in implementing weaning protocols. CONCLUSION: Responses reflected unique advantages of acute care nurse practitioners as members of medical management teams in critical care settings. Despite perceptions of the acute care nurse practitioner's role as medically oriented, the themes reflect a clear nursing focus.     

Using cost-analysis techniques to measure the value of nurse practitioner care

Nurse practitioners are in a unique position to deliver high-quality care to a variety of populations and are being utilized in many countries worldwide. Although certain aspects of the nurse practitioner role may differ from country to country, limited financial support and competition for access to patients make it incumbent on nurse practitioners to document the cost-effectiveness of their care. Cost analysis, a business tool that can be used by any practitioner in any health care system, was used to examine business practices of an academic-based nurse-managed centre. In order for this tool to be effective, nurse practitioners must become comfortable with using cost-analysis techniques in their practices. Linking outcome data with cost data was found to be one method for explicating the value of nurse practitioner practice. Nurse practitioners must also recognize that they are competing with primary-care physician practices and other primary health-care practices. It is vital for nurse practitioners to document both the quality and the costs of their care in order to compete with physicians and other health care providers, in order to influence policy and other health-care decision makers.     

The Acute Care Nurse Practitioner in Collaborative Practice

Nurse-physician relationships remain, for the most part, hierarchical in nature. A hierarchical structure allows the person at the top, most notably the physician, the highest level of authority and power for decision making. Other health care providers are delegated various tasks related to the medical plan of care. One role of nonmedical health care providers, including nurses, is to support the medical plan of care and increase the productivity of physicians. Medical centers have house staff, usually interns and residents, who work collaboratively with the attending physicians in care delivery. At one medical center, a shortage of medical house staff for internal medicine prompted the development and evaluation of an alternative service. The alternative service utilized master prepared, certified nurse practitioners on a nonteaching service to provide care for selected types of medical patients. Physicians consulted with nurse practitioners, but retained decision-making authority concerning patient admission to the service. This paper describes the development and evaluation of an alternative service based on a collaborative practice model and the role of nurse practitioners working under such a model. Discussion includes suggestions for process guideline development for organizations that want to improve collaborative practice relationships between unit nursing staff, nurse practitioners, and physicians.     

The experience of role transition in acute care nurse practitioners in Taiwan under the collaborative practice model

The role of the acute care nurse practitioner in Taiwan has changed significantly since the 1990s due in significant part to a shortage of interns and resident physicians in acute care settings. The first year of professional practice represents an important transitional year during which new professionals develop their competency to provide high-quality care to hospitalized patients. As the actual experience of individuals undergoing this transitional process into their new role has yet to be fully explored, this research studied and categorized the experiences of acute care nurse practitioners during their first year of role transition under the collaborative model of practice. We used a qualitative inquiry method with in-depth interviews to investigate the relevant experiences of 10 acute care nurse practitioners working at a medical center in Taiwan. Results show that the experience of expert nurses in their transition to acute care nurse practitioners passed through three phases during the first year under the collaborative practice model. These phases include the role ambiguity, role acquisition, and role implementation phases. Each phase contained a set of sub-themes which describe the multiple dimensions of this experience. This study highlights the experiences, stresses and accomplishments of acute care nurse practitioners during their initial year of advanced practice.