Adjuvant Chemotherapy with a Combination of Mitoxantrone,Methotrexate, 5-Fluorouracil for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Phase II Pilot Study

Abstract

A phase II pilot study was carried out on 30 patients to ascertain the toxicity and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (NMF) in the adjuvant setting for axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer. The NMF regimen was mitoxantrone 10 mg/m², methotrexate 40 mg/m², and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m² administered i.v. on day 1, repeated every 3-4 weeks for 6 cycles. The median nadir WBC count was 2,000/ml; grade 4 leukocytopenia occurred only in 1 patient. Nausea and vomiting appeared as grade 0 and 1 severity in 26/30 patients. Alopecia was extremely mild, appeared as grade 0 and 1 in 29/30 patients. The overall and relapsefree survival rates were 67.8% and 68.4% at the 82-month follow-up, respectively. The overall survival rate in premenopausal patients was significantly better than that in postmenopausal patients (P<0.05). NMF is a well-tolerated combination regimen, suitable as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer.     

Mitoxantrone, L-leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil: an effective and well tolerated first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The combination of mitoxantrone plus leucovorin/fluorouracil in heavily pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer has shown significant activity and extremely good tolerability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of this combination in patients not previously submitted to chemotherapy. METHODS: From May 1993 to December 1995 we treated 80 patients with advanced breast cancer with a combination of mitoxantrone, l-leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil. All patients had histologically or cytologically proven breast cancer, WHO performance status 0-3, normal hematological parameters and normal serum bilirubin. Prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease was not allowed, whereas adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) or adjuvant anthracycline (doxorubicin or epirubicin) therapy was allowed; a single prior hormone treatment was permitted. Chemotherapy consisted of mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, l-leucovorin 150 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 2 and 3 and 5-fluorouracil 350 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 2 and 3. The courses were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Objective response (CR + PR) was observed in 46/80 (57%) patients (95% CI, 46%-68%). Complete response (CR) was observed in 21/80 cases (26%). Response was observed in 14/24 (58%) patients with soft tissues as the dominant site of disease, in 22/34 (65%) patients with visceral involvement and in 10/22 (45%) of those with bone as the dominant site of disease. The median duration of response and survival was 9 months (range, 3-16) and 22 months (range, 2-48+), respectively. Toxicity was very manageable, with grade 4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in 6/80 (7.5%) and 1/80 (1.25%) patients, respectively, and negligible non-hematological toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil and high-dose l-leucovorin is a safe and effective regimen for first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer.     

CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) versus cnf (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil) as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II lymph-node positive breast cancer: a phase III randomized multicenter study

A multicenter phase III randomized study compared the efficacies of two adjuvant polychemotherapeutic regimens in 145 patients with stage II node-positive breast cancer. The standard chemotherapy combination, CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil), was administered to 77 women. The experimental protocol, CNF (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, 5-FU), in which mitoxantrone (Novantrone) replaced methotrexate, was given to 68 patients. Follow-up of the 145 patients by six participating hospitals showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.6) between the two treatment regimens during a median follow-up of 4.5 years in terms of overall survival. There was, however, a significant advantage (p = 0.04) in the disease-free survival for those receiving mitoxantrone (mean survival 4.4 years for CNF versus 2.7 years for CMF). Toxic side effects associated with CNF (particularly alopecia and myelotoxicity) were relatively more frequent but acceptable and did not lead to dose reduction. In light of its association with improved disease-free survival in this study, larger studies should be undertaken on the role of mitoxantrone as adjuvant treatment in stage II breast cancer.     

First-line treatment with mitoxantrone, methotrexate, vincristine, and carboplatine (MIMOC) plus cyclical hormonotherapy with tamoxifen and megestrol acetate in advanced breast cancer.

Fifty patients with stage IIIB and IV breast cancer entered a prospective study receiving combination chemotherapy consisting of mitoxantrone (8 mg/m2) on day 1, methotrexate (30 mg/m2) on day 1, vincristine (1 mg/m2) on day 2, and carboplatine (250 mg/m2) on day 2 (MIMOC), plus cyclical hormonotherapy with tamoxifen (20 mg daily, days 1-10) and megestrol acetate (160 mg daily, days 11-21). The regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. None had received chemotherapy for advanced disease, although 17 patients had previously received adjuvant chemotherapy and 21 had received adjuvant hormonotherapy with tamoxifen. Twenty-seven patients had positive estrogen receptor (ER+) status, and 23 negative estrogen receptor (ER-) status. Response was observed in 31 (62%) of the 50 analyzed patients (95% CI: 48.5-75.4%), with 5 complete responses (10%). A significantly better response rate was observed in ER+ patients (p = 0.03). The median duration of response was 16 months, and the median time to disease progression was 18 months. The median overall survival was 19 months (27 for responders and 7 for nonresponders). ER+ patients had a higher probability of survival (p = 0.02). Toxicity was moderate. Nausea/vomiting and myelotoxicity were the main side effects. In conclusion, MIMOC plus cyclical hormonotherapy represents a well-tolerated and effective first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. The observed difference in response and survival in favor of ER+ patients warrants further investigation.     

'Neo-FAC' (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) for poor-prognosis stage IV breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Phase II Study.

The authors report a phase II pilot investigation in the Southwest Oncology Group examining a combination of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) incorporating modulated 5-FU in patients with poor-prognosis stage IV breast cancer. Patients with poor-prognosis stage IV breast cancer were treated with this "neo-FAC" as front-line therapy. The regimen consisted of 5-fluorouracil by continuous ambulatory infusion pump at 200 mg/m2/day for 42 days, repeated at 56-day intervals; doxorubicin at 20 mg/m2/week intravenously to a maximum cumulative total dose (including adjuvant therapy, if any) of 500 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/day taken orally; methotrexate 15 mg/m2/week intravenously beginning 1 week after termination of doxorubicin; and oral prednisone decreasing from 60 mg/day on a tapering schedule for a total of 7 weeks of treatment. Treatment was continued until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. Twenty-four patients were accrued to this study. Of these, two were ineligible, and the remaining 22 were evaluable for response. Ten patients experienced grade 3 toxicity, and six had grade 4. There were no treatment-associated deaths. Best responses were a complete response in one patient (5%) and partial responses in 6, for an overall response rate of 32% (7/22 evaluable patients). Overall survival in five pilot studies in the Southwest Oncology Group in this poor-prognosis population are relatively superimposable. The present regimen, with its relatively poor outcome and the expense and inconvenience of administering chemotherapy by ambulatory infusion pump, will not be pursued further.     

CMF (cyclophosphamide,methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) versus CNF (cyclophosphamide,mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil) as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II lymph-node positive breast cancer: results by demographic and clinical subgroups

A multicenter phase III randomized study comparing the efficacies of two adjuvant polychemotherapeutic regimens in 145 patients with stage II node-positive breast cancer: the standard chemotherapy combination, CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil), and an experimental protocol, CNF (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone [Novantrone], 5-fluorouracil) in which mitoxantrone replaced methotrexate. The finding of a significant advantage ( p= 0.04) in the disease-free survival for those receiving mitoxantrone (mean survival 4.4 years for CNF versus 2.7 years for CMF) led the authors to break the data down in subpopulations to determine exactly which groups of women responded more favorably to CNF than CMF. An advantage in disease-free survival was found, most notable in four subgroups: Sephardic women, women less than 45 years of age, premenopausal women, and women with 4 to 10 positive axillary lymph nodes. Although the small numbers of women in each of these subgroups rule out drawing definitive conclusions, the trend merits further study to confirm these observations.     

Combination chemotherapy with cmf (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-Fluorouracil) versus cnf (mitoxantrone, 5-Fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide) in advanced breast-cancer - a multicenter randomized study

A multicentric randomized study was conducted to compare the CNF regimen (cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m2/iv, mitoxantrone at 10 mg/m2/iv, 5-fluorouracil at 600 mg/m2/iv) with the CMF regimen (methotrexate at 40 mg/m2/iv instead of mitoxantrone) administered every 3 weeks to previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients. In 119 patients evaluable for therapeutic response, complete plus partial response rate was 44% for CNF and 29% for CMF (p>0.05; 95% C.I.: CNF=32%-56%, CMF=18%-40%). No statistically significant difference regarding time to progression, over survival or response to second-line chemotherapy with Epidoxorubicin was observed between the two regimens. Both regimens were well tolerated, but the percent of alopecia and leucopenia was significantly higher in the CNF patient group (31% versus 5% and 18% versus 0%, respectively; p<0.01). In conclusion, CNF was demonstrated to be slightly more toxic but more effective as compared to CMF (global response: 44% versus 29%, respectively). These findings should be taken into consideration when planning future studies of adjuvant chemotherapy.     

A phase III randomized trial comparing adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus standard adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in operable node-positive breast cancer: final results

PURPOSE: To compare concomitant and sequential adjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens in node-positive, operable breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a randomized, French, multicenter, phase III trial enrolling 638 eligible women with prior breast surgery and positive axillary dissection. Patients in Arm A received 500 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil, 12 mg/m2 mitoxantrone, and 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, with concomitant radiotherapy (50 Gy +/- 10-20-Gy boost). Patients in Arm B received 500 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil, 60 mg/m2 epirubicin, and 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, with subsequent radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was administered on Day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles. RESULTS: Median treatment durations were 64 and 126 days (Arms A and B, respectively), with no significant difference in overall or disease-free survival. Five-year locoregional relapse-free survival favored patients with conservative surgery (two thirds of the population), with less local and/or regional recurrence in Arm A than in Arm B (3% vs. 9%; p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis in this subgroup showed a 2.8-fold increased risk of locoregional recurrence with sequential chemoradiotherapy, independent of other prognostic factors (p = 0.027). Febrile neutropenia and Grade 3-4 leukopenia were significantly more frequent in Arm A. Subclinical left ventricular ejection fraction events at 1 year were more frequent with concomitant radiotherapy (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant radiotherapy with adjuvant fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, and cyclophosphamide has significantly better locoregional control in node-positive breast cancer after conservative surgery and 50% shorter treatment, albeit with slightly more acute toxicity. With mitoxantrone no longer available for adjuvant breast cancer treatment, alternative concomitant chemoradiotherapy studies are needed.     

Treatment of previously treated metastatic breast cancer by mitoxantrone and 48-hour continuous infusion of high-dose 5-FU and leucovorin (MFL): low palliative benefit and high treatment-related toxicity

For previously treated advanced breast cancer, there is no standard second-line therapy. Combination chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (MFL regimen) had been reported as an effective and well tolerated regimen. From October 1993 to November 1995, we treated 13 patients with previously chemotherapy-treated metastatic breast cancer by mitoxantrone, 12 mg/m2, on day 1 and continuous infusion of 5-FU, 3000 mg/m2, together with leucovorin, 300 mg/m2, for 48 h from day 1 to 2. Each course of chemotherapy was given every 4 weeks. Most of these patients had more than two metastatic sites, with lung metastasis predominant. Seven patients had been treated with anthracycline. Seven patients had previously received radiotherapy and seven had received hormone therapy. Median number of courses of MFL regimen given was six and the median cumulative dose of mitoxantrone was 68.35 mg/m2. One patient had complete response, seven had stable disease, none had partial response and five had progressive disease. The overall objective response rate was 7.6%. The median follow-up period was 14 months. Median survival was 16 months. Median progression-free survival was 5 months. A complete responder had relapse-free survival up to 17 months. Major toxicities were cardiotoxicity and leukopenia. Eight patients were dead in the last follow-up; two of them died of treatment-related toxicity. The MFL regimen achieves little palliative benefit and induces severe toxicity at a fairly high rate. Administration of this regimen to breast cancer patients who have been treated by chemotherapy and those with impaired heart function requires careful attention.      

Adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatinum,mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil,and calcium folinate in patients with gastric cancer: a phase II study

Gastric carcinoma remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the world. Clinical studies have revealed that approximately two thirds of the patients seek treatment for early recurrence within the abdominal cavity. The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the toxicity, feasibility, and efficacy of adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPCT) with cisplatin, mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid in patients with stage II-III gastric cancer. Patients with stage II and III gastric cancer aged between 15 and 70 years, after curative resection, with adequate liver, renal, and cardiac function were included in the study. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of cisplatin 60 mg/m2, mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2, 5-FU 600 mg/m2, and folinic acid 60 mg/m2, delivered intraperitoneally, diluted in 2 l normal saline. Intraperitoneal fluid was not drained. Each course of IPCT was repeated every 4 weeks for a total 6 cycles. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-eight of the 39 patients (71.8%) completed six courses of the planned schedule. One patient (2.6%) died after a fourth cycle of IPCT from an undetermined reason. The major nonhematologic toxicity from IPCT was grade I-III nausea and/or vomiting experienced by 27 patients (69.2%). Twenty-four (61.5%) patients reported abdominal discomfort. Median follow-up was 23 (range: 3-105) months. Twenty-five patients (64.1%) were dead. Median disease-free survival and overall survival were 12 (CI 95%; 8.3-15.7 months) and 19 months (CI 95%; 10.5-27.5 months), respectively. The cumulative 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 24.7% and 30.7%, respectively. The regimen was generally associated with acceptable toxicity. However, adjuvant IPCT has similar survival rates in comparison to no adjuvant treatment; thus, it cannot be currently recommended outside the context of a clinical trial.     

Adjuvant therapy approaches to breast cancer: Should taxanes be incorporated?

The triplet of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) has emerged as an alternative chemotherapy regimen for adjuvant management of node-positive breast cancer. Based on recently reported 3-year data from the Breast Cancer International Research Group (BCIRG) 001, disease-free survival was significantly higher in patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with TAC rather than the established regimen of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC). TAC reduced the risk of disease recurrence in estrogen receptor-positive and -negative patients. Whereas overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups, TAC led to a significant reduction in mortality in the subset of patients with one to three involved axillary lymph nodes. Overall, these interim BCIRG 001 results, coupled with those from Cancer and Leukemia Group B-9344 and National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-28 (phase III trials of sequential adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel), suggest that taxanes are a valuable component of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer, including those with estrogen receptor positivity and/or extensive lymph node involvement. Accumulating data in the neoadjuvant setting lend further support to the view that the taxanes confer clinically meaningful benefits in the management of early-stage breast cancer. Such ongoing studies as NSABP B-30 will be instrumental in establishing the relative merits of sequential versus concurrent taxane-anthracycline adjuvant regimens for patients with node-positive breast cancer.     

The feasibility of classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) for pre- and post-menopausal node-positive breast cancer patients in a Belgian multicentric trial: a study of consistency in relative dose intensity (RDI) and cumulative doses across institutions.

BACKGROUND: Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) including oral cyclophosphamide is still considered an important adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in patients with early breast cancer (BC). Concern has been raised regarding the feasibility of this regimen, especially in postmenopausal patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 254 pre- and post-menopausal node-positive BC patients aged < or = 70 years received six cycles of CMF in the context of a Belgian multicentric phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy. CMF dose and schedule were as follows: cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 p.o. on days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/ml i.v. on days 1 and 8; cycles q. 28 days. The relative dose intensity (RDI) was calculated as the ratio between the delivered DI and the planned DI. We also analysed the RDI in two subgroups of patients with age > or = 50 years or < 50 years. RESULTS: Overall, the percentage of patients ending the six cycles of the planned CMF regimen was 90%. The mean RDI achieved in the population of 254 patients was 90% (range 8% to 129%). The subgroup analysis of patients aged > or = 50 years and < 50 years showed that 81% and 76% of patients, respectively, received > or = 80% of the planned chemotherapy dose intensity (P = 0.33). No statistically significant difference was found between the percentage of patients who received a RDI < 80% and the participating institutions (P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The classical CMF regimen was a feasible regimen in the context of a multicentric trial, in which academic institutions as well as community hospitals participated. No substantial differences in RDI and cumulative doses were found in relation to a patient's age and the participating institution.     

Evaluation of the Survival Benefit of Different Chemotherapy Regimens in Patients with T1-2N0 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in patients with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer.

Methods

Of 67,321 patients who were registered in the Korean Breast Cancer Society nationwide database between January 1999 and December 2008, 4,033 patients with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer were included. The overall survival of patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy was compared with those treated with adjuvant anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC), 5-fluorouracil, anthracycline, and cyclophosphamide (FAC), or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF).

Results

The median follow-up was 52.5 months. Chemotherapy was used in 87.4% of patients; it was used more commonly in patients with T2 tumors, those who were younger, had a higher histologic grade, and who showed lymphovascular invasion. The 5-year cumulative overall survival rate was 95.4%. Younger age, breast-conserving surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with improved overall survival. The 5-year cumulative overall survival rate of patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy and those treated with AC, FAC, and CMF were 92.5%, 95.9%, 95.3%, and 95.9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the administration of any adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was significantly associated with improved overall survival (p=0.038). No significant difference in survival benefit was observed among the three different treatment groups.

Conclusion

A standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen with the least drug-related toxicity might be a reasonable treatment for patients with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer.     

A phase II study of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and thiotepa with autologous marrow support for patients with relapsed breast cancer

To further improve the effect of high-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer, we sought to develop a second active high-dose noncross-resistant regimen to use in tandem with our customary high-dose regimen of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (CVP). We performed a phase II trial of high-dose mitoxantrone 30 mg/m2, etoposide 200 mg/m2 every 12 hours x 6, and thiotepa 250 mg/m2 x 3 days (MVT) in 31 patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer and one with locally advanced chemotherapy-refractory breast cancer. These patients were ineligible for high-dose CVP chemotherapy because of the amount of prior treatment and poor-response status. Of the 32 patients, 14 responded to cycle 1, did not experience any grade 4 toxicity, and received a second cycle of MVT. Overall, seven of 31 patients achieved a complete response (CR; 23%). Four of the 14, who were partial responders to the first cycle, achieved a CR after the second cycle. The overall response rate was 19 of 31 (61%) with an overall median freedom from progression of 4 to 5 months and an overall median survival of 9 months. Toxicity consisted primarily of mucositis (grade 3 or 4 in 69%). The results indicate that high-dose MVT produces significant activity, even in heavily pretreated patients. Administration of a second cycle of high-dose therapy with MVT increased the CR rate, and the morbidity and mortality from the second cycle were not greater than that for the first cycle. Because of the high incidence of grade 3 or 4 mucositis with this regimen, we are currently completing a follow-up study of high-dose mitoxantrone and thiotepa alone.     

The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens consisting of different combinations of drugs in the treatment of advanced oral cancer

We performed a retrospective analysis on the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with three cycles of methotrexate (100 mg/m2 on day 1), cisplatin (90 mg/m2 on day 1) and bleomycin (20mg/m2 on day 1-5) with 21 d gap between each cycle in 44 patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cheek, lip and tongue followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin (90 mg/m2 on day 1), Mitomycin C (6 mg/m2 on day 1) and 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 120 h continuous infusion from day 1) repeated every 3 weeks for three cycles. Following induction chemotherapy, complete response was observed in 11 out of 44 patients (25%), and a partial response in a further 28 patients (64%). The overall median survival of all patients was 29 months and those in stage III and stage IV were 30 and 15 months respectively (P< 0.001). The median duration of the time to relapse in patients who responded to adjuvant chemotherapy was 28 months. The main toxic effect was vomiting followed by hematological toxicity. No treatment-related deaths occurred. The regimen showed a significant response, encouraging median survival and a good tolerability profile.     

Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of doxorubicin versus methotrexate in combination with intravenous cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (FAC versus CMF) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 4-year period, 985 women undergoing curative surgery for breast cancer (T1-3 N0-2 M0, stage I-IIIA, UICC) from nine hospitals were stratified with respect to axillary node involvement (node positive versus node negative) and randomized to receive either FAC (500/50/500/m(2)) every 3 weeks for six cycles or CMF (600/60/600/m(2)) every 3 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: The relative dose intensities of FAC and CMF were 87% and 85% of planned doses, respectively. Unadjusted data indicated a non-significant trend towards better results with FAC. In the prospectively formed subset of node-negative patients, disease-free survival and overall survival were statistically superior in the FAC treatment arm (P = 0.041 and 0.034, respectively), but this advantage was not seen in the subset of node-positive patients, probably because of a difference in the percentage of patients with four or more positive nodes. Adjusting data for size of treatment effect and potential interactions (number of positive nodes, tumor size, treatment center), the overall relative risk (RR) of disease recurrence and death were significantly lower with FAC treatment (RR 1.2, P = 0.03, and RR 1.3, P = 0.05, respectively). This result was mainly due to the difference observed in the node-negative patient population. Toxicity was mild: FAC induced more alopecia, emesis, mucositis and cardiotoxicity; this last was of clinical concern, but was infrequent and manageable. CMF induced more conjunctivitis and weight gain. There were no toxic deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Doxorubicin in combination with day 1 i.v. cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil is superior to methotrexate in combination with day 1 i.v. cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. A treatment effect is particularly evident in the node-negative patients. Although the clinical toxicity of FAC is greater than that of CMF, the levels were manageable and clinically acceptable.     

Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer: update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5.

PURPOSE: Certain anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens are associated with improved relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with the classic regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in women with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 1993, 710 pre- and perimenopausal women with axillary node-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either cyclophosphamide 75 mg/m(2) orally days 1 through 14, epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 and 8, and fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 and 8 (CEF) or CMF (cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m(2) orally days 1 through 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 and 8, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 and 8). On the basis of follow-up to May 1997 (median follow-up time, 59 months), there was a statistically significant improvement in RFS and OS for CEF compared with CMF. RESULTS: The trial results are now updated, with a median follow-up of 10 years for live patients. The 10-year RFS is 52% for patients who received CEF compared with 45% for CMF patients (hazard ratio [HR] for CMF v CEF = 1.31; stratified log-rank, P = .007). The 10-year OS for patients who received CEF and CMF are 62% and 58%, respectively (HR for CMF v CEF = 1.18; stratified log-rank, P = .085). The rates of acute leukemia have not changed since the original report, whereas the rates of congestive heart failure are slightly higher but acceptable (four patients [1.1%] in the CEF group v one patient [0.3%] in the CMF group). CONCLUSION: The previously demonstrated benefit of CEF compared with CMF adjuvant chemotherapy is maintained with longer follow-up in the MA5 trial.     

Postsurgical sequential methotrexate, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for stages 3 and 4 gastric carcinoma: A preliminary study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The present study compared the effects of sequential methotrexate and fluorouracil followed by leucovorin rescue (MFL), as an adjuvant chemotherapy vs. UFT (a combination of uracil and tegafur), on patient survival and recurrence following surgery for advanced gastric carcinoma. METHODS: Between July 1990 and June 1998, a total of 54 patients with advanced gastric cancer were treated postoperatively by adjuvant chemotherapy using MFL or UFT. Surgical treatment was performed according to standardized procedures for radical resection of gastric cancer. The patients were stratified into two groups following surgery. The MFL regimen consisted of methotrexate (100 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2) at hour 3, followed by leucovorin rescue. The oral UFT (375 mg/m2/day), a combination of tegafur and uracil in a molar ratio of 1:4, was continued for 3 years or longer depending on the patients tolerance. RESULTS: In stage 3 gastric cancer, the overall survival rates following surgery was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the MFL than the UFT group. Difference in disease free survival was not statistically significant between the groups. Recurrence rates showed a trend (p = 0.08) to decrease in the MFL than the UFT group. In stage 4 gastric cancer, no significant difference was obtained in the overall survival rates between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggested the superiority of MFL treatment for improving postoperative survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer, in particular for those patients with a high risk of recurrence following potential curative resection. In patients with stage 4 gastric cancer, however, MFL treatment showed similar effects as UFT on the postsurgical survival of the patients.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide,methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil,vincristine, and prednisone compared with single-agent L-phenylalanine mustard for patients with operable breast carcinoma and positive axillary lymph nodes: 20-year results of a Southwest Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil plus vincristine and prednisone (CMFVP) was compared with single-agent L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) for the treatment of patients with axillary lymph node positive primary breast carcinoma over 20-years of follow-up. METHODS: Four hundred forty-one women with axillary lymph node positive breast carcinoma were randomized to receive either combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (60 mg/m(2) orally every day for 1 year), fluorouracil (300 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] weekly for 1 year), methotrexate (15 mg/m(2) IV weekly for 1 year), vincristine (0.625 mg/m(2) IV for 10 weeks), prednisone (30 mg/m(2) orally on Days 1-14, 20 mg/m(2) on Days 15-28, and 10 mg/m(2) on Days 29-42), or single-agent chemotherapy with L-PAM (5 mg/m(2) orally every day for 5 days every 6 weeks for 2 years) after undergoing surgery. Patients were stratified according to menopausal status and number of positive lymph nodes (1-3 positive lymph nodes or > 3 positive lymph nodes). Seventy-seven patients were ineligible. RESULTS: The maximum follow-up is 24 years, with a median follow-up of 21.5 years. Disease free survival and overall survival were superior with CMFVP (two-sided log-rank test; P = 0.0008 and P = 0.007, respectively). For all patients, the estimated 20-year survival rate of patients who received CMFVP was 40% compared with 27% for patients who received L-PAM. There was a substantial survival benefit for CMFVP compared with L-PAM in the subsets of premenopausal patients and patients with four or more positive lymph nodes. The estimated 20-year survival rate for premenopausal women who received CMFVP was 49% compared with 33% for premenopausal women who received L-PAM. Among women with > or = 4 positive lymph nodes, the estimated survival rate for patients who received CMFVP was 31% compared with 15% for patients who received L-PAM. Both regimens were tolerated well. Toxicity was more severe and frequent among patients who received CMFVP. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that, after 20 years of follow-up, adjuvant chemotherapy with CMFVP remains superior to L-PAM for the treatment of patients with lymph node positive breast carcinoma.     

Adjuvant cytotoxic and endocrine therapy in pre- and postmenopausal patients with breast cancer and one to nine infiltrated nodes: five-year results of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized HE 10/92 study

SUMMARY: The present randomized phase III trial was designed to detect a 15% benefit in relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) from the incorporation of adjuvant tamoxifen to the combination of CNF [cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m2; mitoxantrone (Novantrone), 10 mg/m2; fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2 chemotherapy and ovarian ablation in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer and conversely from the incorporation of CNF chemotherapy to adjuvant tamoxifen in node-positive postmenopausal patients. From April 1992 until March 1998, 456 patients with operable breast cancer and one to nine infiltrated axillary nodes entered the study. Premenopausal patients were treated with six cycles of CNF chemotherapy followed by ovarian ablation with monthly injections of triptoreline 3.75 mg for 1 year (Group A, 84 patients) or the same treatment followed by 5 years of tamoxifen (Group B, 92 patients). Postmenopausal patients received 5 years of tamoxifen (Group C, 145 patients) or 6 cycles of CNF followed by 5 years of tamoxifen (Group D, 135 patients). Adjuvant radiation was administered to all patients with partial mastectomy. After a median follow-up period of 5 years, 125 patients (27%) relapsed and 79 (17%) died. The 5-year actuarial RFS for premenopausal patients was 65% in Group A and 68% in Group B (p = 0.86) and for postmenopausal patients 70% in Group C and 67% in Group D (p = 0.36). Also, the respective OS rates were 77% and 80% (p = 0.68) for premenopausal and 84% and 78% (p = 0.10) for postmenopausal patients. Severe toxicities were infrequently seen, with the exception of leukopenia (18%), among the 311 patients treated with CNF. In conclusion, the present study failed to demonstrate a 15% difference in RFS in favor of node-positive premenopausal patients treated with an additional 5 years of tamoxifen after CNF adjuvant chemotherapy and ovarian ablation. Similarly, six cycles of CNF preceding 5 years of tamoxifen did not translate to a 15% RFS benefit in node-positive postmenopausal patients.