首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
The Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) is a multicentre, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study designed to compare the effects of candesartan cilexetil and placebo in elderly patients with mild hypertension. The primary objective of the study is to assess the effect of candesartan cilexetil on major cardiovascular events. The secondary objectives of the study are to assess the effect of candesartan cilexetil on cognitive function and on total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, renal function, hospitalization, quality of life and health economics. Male and female patients aged between 70 and 89 years, with a sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 160-179 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90-99 mmHg, and a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 24 or above, are eligible for the study. The overall target study population is 4000 patients, at least 1000 of whom are also to be assessed for quality of life and health economics data. After an open run-in period lasting 1-3 months, during which patients are assessed for eligibility and those who are already on antihypertensive therapy at enrolment are switched to hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg o.d., patients are randomized to receive either candesartan cilexetil 8 mg once daily (o.d.) or matching placebo o.d. At subsequent study visits, if SBP remains >160 mmHg, or has decreased by <10 mmHg since the randomization visit, or DBP is >85 mmHg, study treatment is doubled to candesartan cilexetil 16 mg o.d. or two placebo tablets o.d. Recruitment was completed in January 1999. At that time 4964 patients had been randomized. All randomized patients will be followed for an additional 2 years. If the event rate is lower than anticipated, the follow-up will be prolonged.  相似文献   

2.
The Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) is a multi-centre, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary objective of SCOPE is to assess the effect of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker, candesartan cilexetil 8-16 mg once daily, on major cardiovascular events in elderly patients (70-89 years of age) with mild hypertension (DBP 90-99 and/or SBP 160-179 mmHg). The secondary objectives of the study are to test the hypothesis that antihypertensive therapy can prevent cognitive decline (as measured by the Mini Mental State Examination, MMSE) and dementia, and to assess the effect of therapy on total mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, renal function, and hospitalization. A total of 4964 patients from 15 participating countries were recruited during the randomization phase of SCOPE, exceeding the target population of 4000. The mean age of the patients at enrolment was 76 years, the ratio of male to female patients was approximately 1:2, and 52% of patients were already being treated with an antihypertensive agent at enrolment. The majority of patients (88%) were educated to at least primary school level. At randomization, mean sitting blood pressure values were SBP 166 mmHg and DBP 90 mmHg, and the mean MMSE score was 28. Previous cardiovascular disease in the study population included myocardial infarction (4%), stroke (4%) and atrial fibrillation (4%). Men, more often than women, had a history of previous MI, stroke and atrial fibrillation. A greater percentage of men were smokers (13% vs 6% in women) and had attended university (11% vs 3% of women). Of the randomized patients, 21% were 80 years of age. In this age group smoking was less common (4% vs 10% for 70-79-year-olds) and fewer had attended university (4% vs 7% for 70-79-year-olds). The incidence of MI was similar in both age groups. However, stroke and atrial fibrillation had occurred approximately twice as frequently in the older patients. The patients' mean age at baseline was similar in the participating countries, and most countries showed the approximate 1:2 ratio for male to female patients. There was also little inter-country variation in terms of mean SBP, DBP or MMSE score. However, there was considerable regional variation in the percentage of patients on therapy prior to enrolment.  相似文献   

3.
The Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) is a multi-centre, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary objective of SCOPE is to assess the effect of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker, candesartan cilexetil 8-16 mg once daily, on major cardiovascular events in elderly patients (70-89 years of age) with mild hypertension (DBP 90-99 and/or SBP 160-179 mmHg). The secondary objectives of the study are to test the hypothesis that antihypertensive therapy can prevent cognitive decline (as measured by the Mini Mental State Examination, MMSE) and dementia, and to assess the effect of therapy on total mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, renal function, and hospitalization. A total of 4964 patients from 15 participating countries were recruited during the randomization phase of SCOPE, exceeding the target population of 4000. The mean age of the patients at enrolment was 76 years, the ratio of male to female patients was approximately 1:2, and 52% of patients were already being treated with an antihypertensive agent at enrolment. The majority of patients (88%) were educated to at least primary school level. At randomization, mean sitting blood pressure values were SBP 166 mmHg and DBP 90 mmHg, and the mean MMSE score was 28. Previous cardiovascular disease in the study population included myocardial infarction (4%), stroke (4%) and atrial fibrillation (4%). Men, more often than women, had a history of previous MI, stroke and atrial fibrillation. A greater percentage of men were smokers (13% vs 6% in women) and had attended university (11% vs 3% of women). Of the randomized patients, 21% were 80 years of age. In this age group smoking was less common (4% vs 10% for 70-79-year-olds) and fewer had attended university (4% vs 7% for 70-79-year-olds). The incidence of MI was similar in both age groups. However, stroke and atrial fibrillation had occurred approximately twice as frequently in the older patients. The patients' mean age at baseline was similar in the participating countries, and most countries showed the approximate 1:2 ratio for male to female patients. There was also little inter-country variation in terms of mean SBP, DBP or MMSE score. However, there was considerable regional variation in the percentage of patients on therapy prior to enrolment.  相似文献   

4.
The Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) assessed the effect of candesartan on cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Patients were randomized to candesartan 8-16 mg daily (n = 2477) or placebo (n =2460). Due to extensive add-on therapy, blood pressure reduction was only about 3/2 mmHg greater in the candesartan group than in the control group. Nevertheless, non-fatal stroke was reduced by 28% (p = 0.04) in the candesartan group compared to the control group, and there was a non-significant 11% reduction in major cardiovascular events (p = 0.19). This report provides results in pre-specified subgroups of patients (age, gender, diabetes, history of stroke, smoking and cardiovascular risk at randomization). Reductions in major cardiovascular events and stroke with candesartan-based therapy were indicated in all subgroups. A significant interaction between treatment and subgroups was found for one pair of subgroups only; the reduction in major cardiovascular events with candesartan was greater in patients with a previous stroke (64% reduction, p = 0.004) than in those without (5% reduction, p > 0.20). In conclusion, this analysis indicated consistent favourable effects of candesartan-based therapy on major cardiovascular events and stroke across the different subgroups of patients. However, the benefit was particularly pronounced in patients who entered the study with a previous stroke.  相似文献   

5.
OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical outcomes in the Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) in patients who did not receive add-on antihypertensive therapy after randomization, i.e. in patients that best reflect the original intention of a placebo-controlled trial. DESIGN: Post-hoc analysis of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred and twenty-seven centres in 15 countries participated in SCOPE. Patients aged 70-89 years, with systolic blood pressure 160-179 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure 90-99 mmHg, and preserved cognitive function were eligible. Out of 4937 patients in SCOPE, 2098 did not receive add-on therapy. INTERVENTION: The number of patients who received candesartan 8-16 mg once daily was 1253, and 845 received placebo. Mean follow-up was 3.7 and 3.5 years, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal stroke or non-fatal myocardial infarction). Secondary: total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal and non-fatal stroke, cognitive function, and dementia. RESULTS: The treatment groups were generally well balanced for baseline characteristics. Blood pressure fell by 21.8/11.0 mmHg in the candesartan group and by 17.2/8.4 mmHg in the placebo group. There were significant relative risk reductions with candesartan in major cardiovascular events (32%, P = 0.013), cardiovascular mortality (29%, P = 0.049), and total mortality (27%, P = 0.018). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in cognitive outcomes. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of elderly patients with mild hypertension is beneficial and supports current recommendations. Candesartan appears an appropriate therapy in such patients, in view of its favourable tolerability profile and ability to reduce major cardiovascular events.  相似文献   

6.
BACKGROUND: We examined whether cognitive function at baseline affected cognitive and cardiovascular outcomes in the Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE), a blood pressure (BP)-lowering intervention trial. METHODS: SCOPE included 4937 patients, aged 70 to 89 years, with mild-to-moderate hypertension and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score > or =24. Double-blind treatment was initiated with candesartan or placebo. Open-label therapy was added as needed to control BP, both in the candesartan (49%) and control (66%) groups. Mean follow-up was 3.7 years. Low cognitive function (LCF) at baseline was defined as MMSE score 24 to 28 (N = 2070), and high cognitive function (HCF) as MMSE score 29 to 30 (N = 2867). RESULTS: Mean BP reductions were approximately 20/10 mm Hg both in LCF and HCF patients, with greater reductions in the candesartan group than in the control group. The incidence of dementia was higher in LCF than in HCF patients. A higher cardiovascular event rate observed in LCF patients was explained by older age and other cardiovascular risk factors at baseline. In LCF patients, the MMSE score declined less in the candesartan than in the control group (mean difference 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.97, P = .04). Nonfatal stroke was reduced in the candesartan group in the total sample (28%, P = .04), with no difference between LCF (27%) and HCF (29%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension and slightly impaired cognitive function (MMSE 24 to 28) are at increased risk of dementia and cardiovascular events. This analysis indicates that effective antihypertensive therapy may reduce cognitive decline and stroke incidence in these patients.  相似文献   

7.
Aim: Reduction of elevated blood pressure (BP) has been an important treatment goal in elderly hypertensive patients. However, it has been reported that an excessive reduction of systolic BP to less than 120 mmHg might be harmful in such patients. We investigated whether this was the case in a study which assessed long‐term antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability and impact on cardiovascular/cerebrovascular (CV) morbidity/mortality in a large cohort of Japanese patients. Methods: This study was performed at general practitioners' offices nationwide with a target sample size of 1500 patients. Hypertensive patients aged 60 years or more who achieved successful BP control with candesartan monotherapy, and who tolerated the treatment for at least 8 weeks, were enrolled into the study and followed for 3 years. Results: BP was maintained below the target level of 140/90 mmHg over the 3‐year period. The incidence of CV events during the study period was 20.4/1000 person‐years. Investigation of the relationship between BP and the incidence of CV events revealed that patients with higher BP generally had a higher incidence of events. However, very elderly patients (≥75 years) with a systolic BP (SBP) of less than 120 mmHg also had a higher incidence of CV events compared with those with an SBP of 120–139 mmHg. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that treatment with candesartan maintained long‐term control of BP in elderly hypertensive patients without serious adverse events. CV events demonstrated a J‐curve relationship with SBP in patients aged 75 years or older, which suggests that excessive BP reductions might be harmful for very elderly patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2011; 11: 414–421.  相似文献   

8.
The Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) was a multinational, randomised, double-blind study to assess the effects of candesartan 8-16 mg daily on cardiovascular events and cognitive function in elderly patients (aged 70-89 years) with mild to moderate hypertension. A total of 4937 patients were randomised to candesartan or placebo with other antihypertensive drugs (mostly diuretics, beta-blockers, and calcium antagonists) added as needed to control blood pressure. Only 16% of the patients in the control group received placebo alone. The mean follow-up was 3.7 years. The aim of this health-related quality of life (HRQL) substudy analysis was to investigate changes in HRQL during antihypertensive treatment, and possible differences in patients receiving candesartan-based or other antihypertensive treatment. Three validated HRQL instruments were used: the Psychological General Well-being (PGWB) Index, the Subjective Symptoms Assessment Profile (SSA-P), and the EuroQoL Health Utility Index (EuroQoL). The HRQL was generally good at baseline and well preserved during follow-up in the presence of substantial blood pressure reductions in both treatment groups. Several of the observed changes in score from baseline to last visit favoured candesartan-based compared to control treatment, particularly the changes in PGWB Anxiety (-0.5 vs -1.0, P=0.01), PGWB Positive well-being (-0.8 vs -1.1, P=0.04), SSA-P Cardiac symptoms (0.03 vs 0.10, P=0.03), and EuroQoL Current health (-3.1 vs -5.3, P=0.008). This favourable result may be related to the somewhat lower blood pressure associated with candesartan-based treatment. In conclusion, there should be no reason to withhold modern antihypertensive therapy in elderly patients due to concerns for a negative effect on HRQL.  相似文献   

9.
10.
BACKGROUND: The prognostic benefits of blood pressure lowering treatment in elderly hypertensive patients were established more than a decade ago, but are less clear in those with mildly to moderately elevated blood pressure. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether candesartan-based antihypertensive treatment in elderly patients with mildly to moderately elevated blood pressure confers a reduction in cardiovascular events, cognitive decline and dementia. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study conducted in 1997-2002. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study was of 4964 patients aged 70-89 years, with systolic blood pressure 160-179 mmHg, and/or diastolic blood pressure 90-99 mmHg, and a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) test score >or= 24. A total of 527 centres in 15 countries participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned randomly to receive the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan or placebo, with open-label active antihypertensive therapy added as needed. As a consequence, active antihypertensive therapy was extensively used in the control group (84% of patients). Mean follow-up was 3.7 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was major cardiovascular events, a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal stroke and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Secondary outcome measures included cardiovascular death, non-fatal and fatal stroke and myocardial infarction, cognitive function measured by the MMSE and dementia. RESULTS: Blood pressure fell by 21.7/10.8 mmHg in the candesartan group and by 18.5/9.2 mmHg in the control group. A first major cardiovascular event occurred in 242 candesartan patients and in 268 control patients; risk reduction with candesartan was 10.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), -6.0 to 25.1, P = 0.19]. Candesartan-based treatment reduced non-fatal stroke by 27.8% (95% CI, 1.3 to 47.2, P = 0.04), and all stroke by 23.6% (95% CI, -0.7 to 42.1, P = 0.056). There were no significant differences in myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality. Mean MMSE score fell from 28.5 to 28.0 in the candesartan group and from 28.5 to 27.9 in the control group (P = 0.20). The proportions of patients who had a significant cognitive decline or developed dementia were not different in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly hypertensive patients, a slightly more effective blood pressure reduction during candesartan-based therapy, compared with control therapy, was associated with a modest, statistically non-significant, reduction in major cardiovascular events and with a marked reduction in non-fatal stroke. Cognitive function was well maintained in both treatment groups in the presence of substantial blood pressure reductions. Both treatment regimens were generally well tolerated.  相似文献   

11.
12.
The estimated prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) in the general population is 3% to 8%. As the average age of the population in the United States and other countries continues to increase, the overall prevalence of SCH may also be expected to increase. Although age‐related changes in thyroid function are well described, normal thyroid‐stimulating hormone (TSH) reference limits, derived for age‐specific populations, are not routinely used to identify thyroid dysfunction in elderly adults. Therefore, currently accepted values for the upper limit of normal of TSH may be inappropriate for diagnosing SCH in individuals aged 65 and older, resulting in potential overestimation of the prevalence of SCH in this population. This review discusses the current evidence of the effects of SCH on cardiovascular health and neuropsychiatric function in older adults. Although the results of some studies are conflicting, the overall evidence suggests that the consequences of SCH may be different for elderly adults than for younger populations. Treatment of SCH in older individuals requires special consideration with regard to thyroid hormone replacement therapy and expected clinical outcomes. Although careful identification of individuals with persistent SCH who could benefit from levothyroxine treatment is necessary, current evidence suggests that individuals with TSH levels greater than 10 mIU/L who test positive for antithyroid antibodies or are symptomatic may benefit from levothyroxine treatment to reduce the risk of progression to overt hypothyroidism, decrease the risk of adverse cardiovascular events, and improve their quality of life. After treatment is initiated, careful monitoring is essential.  相似文献   

13.
ABSTRACT

This study of Hebrew speaking Israelis (n = 77) found that the MEAMS had internal reliability (Cronbach alpha = .75) and parallel form reliability (r = .71). Validity was examined by correlaing the MEAMS to established tests such as the MMSE (r = .64) and Clock Completion Test (r = -.53) and Functional Independent Measure (r = .35). The MEAMS correlated with demographic variables (age r = -.38, education r = .24).  相似文献   

14.
Because medically useful information could also be gathered through hospital-based studies, the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of HT among the elderly at a university hospital in Turkey. A total of 3,038 elderly were enrolled. Overall, 75.1% of the patients had HT. Among the hypertensive elderly, 88.9% were aware that they had HT, and only 20.9% had BPs that were under control. The low prevalence of control, even among individuals aware of their HT, suggests that the education of health care providers at all stages of professional training is especially important.  相似文献   

15.
16.
Cozaar降压疗效及对靶器官的保护作用   总被引:6,自引:1,他引:5  
罗助荣  郑冰 《高血压杂志》1999,7(2):148-150
目的探讨血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂-Cozaar(科素亚)的降压疗效及对心肾靶器官的影响。方法60例高血压病Ⅱ期患者服用Cozaar50mg/d~100mg/d治疗八周。结果Cozaar不仅使血压持续下降,并且逆转心脏左室肥厚,改善心功能,降低尿蛋白排泄量及血尿β2-MG含量水平(P<0.01)。结论Cozaar降压疗效肯定及对高血压靶器官具有保护作用。  相似文献   

17.
Patients who survive a first stroke are often left with permanent disabilities, and have significant needs for rehabilitation and long-term care. Antihypertensive treatment reduces the risk of cardiovascular events such as stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of candesartan-based antihypertensive treatment for the prevention of nonfatal stroke. The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on data from Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE), where patients were randomly assigned to receive the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan or placebo, with open-label active antihypertensive treatment added as needed. The analysis was carried out using a Markov model, which combined clinical and resource utilization data from SCOPE with Swedish retail prices for drugs and unit costs for in-patient stays, and outpatient visits. The cost per patient was 1949 EUR in the candesartan group and 1578 EUR in the control group. The largest share of the cost was attributed to antihypertensive treatment in the candesartan group and to the long-term cost of stroke in the control group. Candesartan-based antihypertensive treatment was associated with 0.0289 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient and an incremental cost per QALY gained of approximately 13,000 EUR. Sensitivity analyses showed that these results were fairly stable. In conclusion, the cost per QALY gained with candesartan-based antihypertensive treatment lies within the range of society's willingness to pay for health gains. The results indicate that candesartan-based antihypertensive treatment is cost-effective for the prevention of nonfatal stroke.  相似文献   

18.
The associations of blood pressure components with cardiovascular risks and death remain unclear, and the definition of wide pulse pressure (PP) is still controversial. Using data from 1257 participants without a history of cardiovascular disease, who were followed for 4.84 years, we performed multivariable Cox regression analyses to assess how systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and PP contribute to risks of cardiovascular events and all‐cause death. Among all participants, SBP and PP were significantly associated with the risks of cardiovascular events and all‐cause death (all p < .05). DBP was not significantly associated with the risk of all‐cause death; rather, it was only associated with a marginally significant 1% increased risk for cardiovascular events (p = 0.051). In participants aged < 65 years, DBP was significantly associated with a 3% increased risk for cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.01–1.06). The association between PP and cardiovascular events appeared to be J‐shaped in comparison to participants with the lowest‐risk PP (50–60 mmHg), with adjusted HRs of 1.71 (95% CI: 1.03–2.85), 1.63 (95% CI: 1.00–2.68), and 2.13 (95% CI: 1.32–3.43) in the <50, 60.0–72.5, and ≥72.5 mmHg subgroups, respectively. The optimal cutoff points of a wide PP for predicting the risks of cardiovascular events and all‐cause death were 70.25 and 76.25 mmHg, respectively. SBP and PP had a greater effect on cardiovascular risk, whereas DBP independently influenced cardiovascular events in middle‐aged participants. Considerable PP alterations should be avoided in antihypertensive treatment.  相似文献   

19.
目的探讨老年高血压患者身体活动能力对认知功能的影响。方法 2015年8月至2016年5月从武汉市28个社区卫生服务中心/乡镇卫生院分层随机抽取年龄≥65岁的高血压患者1 508人,患者的身体活动状况采用老年人身体活动量表(PASE)评估,其中身体活动包括休闲身体活动、家务活动、职业身体活动;认知功能采用简易精神状态量表(MMSE)评估。结果多因素非条件Logistic回归分析结果显示,较多身体活动、受教育程度高、运动习惯好是认知功能的保护性因素,而高龄是认知功能的危险因素;认知功能与性别有关,女性较男性认知功能差;认知功能与高血压患者吸烟、体质量指数、腰围身高比、血压水平分级、高血压合并糖尿病、冠心病、高血脂症未见显著相关性(P>0.05);多元线性回归分析结果显示,将身体活动细化分类后,认知功能与休闲身体活动中坐着的运动、外出散步或步行、中度身体活动、费力身体活动以及职业身体活动呈正相关,且与坐着的运动、外出散步或步行相关性最明显(β值分别为0.185,0.191;均P<0.05)。认知功能与轻度身体活动、增加肌肉力量的活动、家务活动不相关(P>0.05)。结论老年高血压患者较多身体活动是认知功能的保护性因素,认知功能与休闲身体活动中坐着的运动、外出散步或步行相关性最明显。  相似文献   

20.
硝酸酯类药物对老年单纯收缩期高血压的有益作用   总被引:9,自引:0,他引:9  
目的 观察硝酸酯类药物对老年单纯收缩期高血压 (ISH)患者降压治疗的有益作用。方法  87例ISH患者随机分为对照组 4 6例和治疗组 4 1例 ,对照组给予非洛地平缓释片 5mg ,每日一次口服 ,治疗组在上述治疗的基础上给予加用单硝酸异山梨酯 (ISMN) 2 0mg ,每日二次口服 ,疗程8周。结果  (1)治疗组从第 2周开始收缩压 (SBP)下降幅度即大于对照组 ,且先于对照组于第 4周降至正常 ,差别有显著性 (P <0 0 5 ) ;(2 )从第 2周开始治疗组舒张压 (DBP)下降幅度即小于对照组(P <0 0 5 ) ,第 6周开始差距进一步加大 ,差别有显著性 (P <0 0 1) ,整个观察期内治疗组DBP下降幅度始终小于对照组 ,且从第 4周开始处于相对稳定状态 ;(3)第 2周开始治疗组PP下降幅度即大于对照组 (P <0 0 5 ) ,第 4周开始差距进一步加大 ,差别有显著性 (P <0 0 1)。结论 硝酸酯类药物能降低ISH患者的SBP ,而对DBP影响不大 ,使PP减小 ,对ISH患者降压治疗的有益。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号