Injury-prevention counseling among residents of internal medicine

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Preventive Service Task Force's Guide to Clinical Preventive Services and Healthy People 2000 recommend that physicians participate in various counseling activities, including injury prevention. Despite recommendations, rates of physician counseling, particularly injury prevention, are low. This study assessed clinical preventive services and attitudes among physicians. Furthermore, the study illustrates how physicians prioritize injury-prevention counseling relative to other prevention recommendations. METHODS: Personal characteristics (i.e., demographics, specialty orientation, attitudes toward prevention, and personal health behaviors) of the residents were collected by a self-administered survey. We performed a 12-month retrospective chart review of 184 new doctor-patient encounters to determine rates of clinical preventive services that included four injury-prevention services: the use of seatbelts, helmets, and smoke detectors; and the safe storage of firearms. RESULTS: Overall, attitudes toward injury prevention in the context of other clinical preventive services were low. Seatbelt counseling was the only injury-prevention service documented in the charts, and was performed at only one of four clinic sites. CONCLUSIONS: Clinic site as a key predictor of preventive practice may be suggestive of the importance of organizational priorities and professional norms. Future injury-prevention education efforts must aim at improving attitudes of current and future physicians to facilitate positive professional norms.     

Developing a Typology of African Americans With Limited Literacy Based on Preventive Health Practice Orientation: Implications for Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies

Preventive health messages are often tailored to reach broad sociodemographic groups. However, within groups, there may be considerable variation in perceptions of preventive health practices, such as colorectal cancer screening. Segmentation analysis provides a tool for crafting messages that are tailored more closely to the mental models of targeted individuals or subgroups. This study used cluster analysis, a psychosocial marketing segmentation technique, to develop a typology of colorectal cancer screening orientation among 102 African American clinic patients between the ages of 50 and 74 years with limited literacy. Patients were from a general internal medicine clinic in a large urban teaching hospital, a subpopulation known to have high rates of colorectal cancer and low rates of screening. Preventive screening orientation variables included the patients' responses to questions involving personal attitudes and preferences toward preventive screening and general prevention practices. A k-means cluster analysis yielded three clusters of patients on the basis of their screening orientation: ready screeners (50.0%), cautious screeners (30.4%), and fearful avoiders (19.6%). The resulting typology clearly defines important subgroups on the basis of their preventive health practice perceptions. The authors propose that the development of a validated typology of patients on the basis of their preventive health perceptions could be applicable to a variety of health concerns. Such a typology would serve to standardize how populations are characterized and would provide a more accurate view of their preventive health-related attitudes, values, concerns, preferences, and behaviors. Used with standardized assessment tools, it would provide an empirical basis for tailoring health messages and improving medical communication.     

Experiences with a combined residency in internal and preventive medicine

BACKGROUND: The importance of integrating preventive medicine training into other residency programs was reinforced recently by the residency review committee for preventive medicine. Griffin Hospital in Derby CT has offered a 4-year integrated internal medicine and preventive medicine residency program since 1997. This article reports the outcomes of that program. METHODS: Data were collected from surveys of program graduates and the American Boards of Internal and Preventive Medicine in 2005-2007, and analyzed in 2007-2008. Graduates rated the program in regard to job preparation, the ease of transition to employment, the value of skills learned, the perceived quality of board preparation, and the quality of the program overall. Graduates rated themselves on core competencies set by the Accreditation Committee for Graduate Medical Education. RESULTS: Since 1997, the program has enrolled 22 residents. Residents and graduates contribute significantly toward quality of care at the hospital. Graduates take and pass at high rates the boards for both for internal and preventive medicine: 100% took internal medicine boards, 90% of them passed; 63% took preventive medicine boards, 100% of them passed). The program has recruited residents mainly through the match. Graduates rated most elements of the program highly. They felt well-prepared for their postgraduation jobs; most respondents reported routinely using preventive medicine skills learned during residency. Graduates either have gone into academic medicine (31%); public health (14%); clinical fellowships (18%); or primary care (9%); or they combine elements of clinical medicine and public health (28%). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating preventive medicine training into clinical residency programs may be an efficient, viable, and cost-effective way of creating more medical specialists with population-medicine skills.     

The AMA Residency Training in Adolescent Preventive Services Project: report of the working group. The American Medical Association.

PURPOSE: To improve resident education in provision of adolescent preventive health care. The American Medical Association (AMA) Residency Training in Adolescent Preventive Services Project Working Group convened to identify specific goals and objectives (G&Os) for pediatric and family medicine resident education in adolescent clinical preventive services and recommend strategies to achieve these G&Os. METHODS: Iterative review process involving members of the working group, nine experienced teaching faculty and 16 resident physicians from family medicine and pediatric training programs, and an advisory board. RESULTS: We achieved consensus on appropriate G&Os for pediatric and family medicine residency education in adolescent clinical preventive services. Faculty and residents expressed concerns about achieving G&Os because of challenges to implementing effective training and evaluation strategies. Suggestions for achieving G&Os included development of an adolescent clinical preventive services curriculum and evaluation program that could be adapted for use in a variety of training program structures. Faculty and residents anticipated the success of a training curriculum would be influenced by: (a) availability of adequate numbers of skilled teaching faculty; (b) availability of time and support for faculty development and teaching efforts; and (c) exposure of residents to adequate numbers of adolescent patients in settings where there are clear expectations for delivery of comprehensive preventive services. CONCLUSIONS: The AMA Residency Training in Adolescent Preventive Services Project Working Group presents G&Os for organizing training experiences in adolescent clinical preventive services in family medicine and pediatric residency training programs and recommends strategies to achieve these G&Os.     

Public health detailing: a strategy to improve the delivery of clinical preventive services in New York City

To promote use of essential clinical preventive services, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene developed the Public Health Detailing Program, a primary care provider outreach initiative modeled on pharmaceutical detailing. Department representatives conducted topical campaigns, making unscheduled visits to health care practices and meeting with providers and office staff members. Representatives distributed "action kits" containing practice tools, provider information, and patient education materials; nicotine replacement therapy was distributed during the smoking cessation campaign. More than 2,500 interactions with practice staff members were completed by six health department representatives at approximately 200 sites. Physician visits lasted 10 minutes or longer, and by provider self-report, use of office systems for prevention and adherence to recommended practices increased. Public health detailing is an effective method of reaching providers to deliver key prevention messages, feasible for public health agencies and acceptable to practices. The effectiveness of this intervention in improving clinical prevention services requires further evaluation.     

A threat to the public health workforce: evidence from trends in preventive medicine certification and training

Evidence of a growing need for preventive medicine specialists is the congruence between needed competencies for practice in the current health care environment, as identified by the Council on Graduate Medical Education (COGME) and in other national reports, and the core competencies of preventive medicine residents. The total number of certified specialists in preventive medicine is 6091. The proportion of self-designated preventive medicine specialists among all U.S. physicians is on the decline and the greatest decline has been among those in public health (PH) and general preventive medicine (GPM). In addition, the total number of preventive medicine residents is on the decline, and the decline has been greatest among those training in PH and combined PH/GPM. One of the reasons for this decline has been inadequate funding due to the absence of Medicare graduate medical education (GME) financing for population-based vs. individual patient care services and meager and diminishing Title VII support. A paucity of faculty is apparent in medical schools with residency training and board certification in preventive medicine. Several actions may help reverse this trend and assure adequate numbers of preventive medicine specialists: expansion of Title VII to increase the number of residents receiving stipends and tuition, adding infrastructure support for faculty development and funding of demonstration projects in distance learning and in joint generalist/ preventive medicine residency training. Medicare GME reform should include recognition of population-based services and inclusion of preventive medicine residencies in provisions for "nonhospital-based" training and in up-weighting methodologies for primary care training. Expansion of Veterans Affairs, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and Department of Defense support is also needed as is attention to resident debt reduction.     

Factors influencing physicians' orientation toward prevention

We examined the influence of various background characteristics as well as other variables such as personal health practices, specialty choice, and political orientation, on the attitudes of medical graduates toward the physician's role in prevention. The study was part of a 1979 survey conducted in three U.S. medical schools. The results revealed that graduates who believed more strongly in the physician's role in prevention tended to be in primary care training, had a more liberal political orientation, and came more often from physician families. These graduates also believed more strongly that physicians ought to be role models for their patients in health habits. However, they did not manifest better personal health practices than physicians less oriented toward prevention. There was also a medical school effect, although it could not be determined whether this represented the influence of the curriculum or of the selection process into medical school.     

Put prevention into practice: a controlled evaluation

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether Put Prevention Into Practice (PPIP) materials affected the delivery of 8 clinical preventive services. METHODS: Program materials were provided to a family medicine practice serving a diverse, low-income population. Appropriate use of clinical preventive services was assessed via medical record reviews at baseline, 6 months, 18 months, and 30 months at both intervention and control sites. RESULTS: The delivery rates of 7 clinical preventive services were higher in the intervention site at 6 months. These rates had flattened or decreased by 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: Use of PPIP materials modestly improved delivery of certain clinical preventive services. Sustained improvement will require substantial system changes and ongoing support.     

The delivery of preventive services for patient symptoms

BACKGROUND: Although data are available on rates of delivery of preventive services by primary care physicians, the proportion of services delivered because of related symptoms or signs, rather than for primary or secondary prevention of disease is not known. METHODS: Research nurses directly observed 4454 consecutive visits to 138 practicing family physicians. Direct observation was used to identify delivery of 36 different services recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and to assess whether delivery of these services was associated with related signs or symptoms. RESULTS: One or more preventive services were delivered in 33% of visits, with rates ranging from 0.2% (HIV prevention) to 19.9% (tobacco counseling). In contrast to pure prevention, services were frequently performed for assessment or care of symptoms or signs, with the ratio ranging from 0% (eye examination; car seat, poison control, and HIV prevention counseling) to 66.7% (hearing test). Physicians varied considerably in the frequency at which their delivery of recommended preventive services was associated with patient symptoms, from 0% to 100% for screening services and from 0% to 100% for counseling services. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the illness focus of most primary care visits, preventive service delivery is often associated with related signs or symptoms. Care of illnesses appears to present an important impetus and perhaps teachable moments for providing preventive care. Clinician variability in preventive service delivery for patient symptoms shows an opportunity to improve the primary and secondary prevention focus of practice to meet public health prevention goals.     

Tools,teamwork, and tenacity: an examination of family practice office system influences on preventive service delivery

BACKGROUND: Most research examining primary care office characteristics and preventive service delivery (PSD) has evaluated preventive service aids and equipment, while generally overlooking the complex interactions among multiple office systems where multiple factors influence the overall practice. We test a theoretical model of practice influences on PSD that accounts for Tools (preventive service aids/equipment), Teamwork (office organization), and Tenacity (prevention delivery attitudes). METHODS: Office characteristics and 4454 patient visits were observed for 138 family physicians in northeast Ohio. Utilizing U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations, age- and gender-specific PSD summary scores were computed for each patient and then averaged per physician. Multivariate analysis of variance tested office characteristic associations with PSD scores. RESULTS: Tools were common, but most were not significantly associated with PSD scores. The Teamwork indicators of clear staff role expectations and shared vision among physician and staff existed, respectively, for 80 and 73% of physicians. A high average reported practice focus on prevention existed, despite low staff involvement in PSD (22.2%). Compared with Tools, more Teamwork and Tenacity characteristics were associated with the PSD scores. CONCLUSION: Teamwork and Tenacity appear to be more important than Tools in delivering preventive services in primary care practices.     

天津市宝坻区某镇居民卫生服务满意度基线调查分析——国家科技部十一五规划项目“全科型乡镇卫生院建设”项目

目的:了解农村居民对乡镇卫生院卫生服务的满意情况,为发展和提高农村卫生服务提供理论依据。方法:随机抽取587名口东镇居民,通过问卷调查形式,进行就医满意度调查,并对数据进行描述性分析。结果:本次调查结果显示,农村居民对于乡镇卫生院门诊服务的总体满意度为31.8%,各分类的满意度由高到低依次为:护士满意度(80.3%)、就医便捷程度(72.6%)、城镇居民医保报销情况(52.1%)、收费合理性(44.3%)、服务态度(35.3%)、解释交流(33.7%)、慢病防治知识告知(8.6%)、预防保健服务(8.5%)、药品齐全程度(5.3%)、就医设施和环境(4.8%)、医师技术(4.8%)。结论:满意度最低的五项为医师技术、就医设施和环境、药品齐全程度、慢病防治知识告知、预防保健服务,满意度均不足10%,提示乡镇卫生院应多渠道提高医师自身业务水平,不断提高卫生院预防保健职能,优化卫生院就医条件,增加药品种类,为居民提供更优质的卫生服务,以提高卫生院的整体满意度水平。     

Vaccinations and preventive screening services for older adults: opportunities and challenges in the USA

Vaccinations and disease-screening services occupy an important position within the constellation of interventions designed to prevent, forestall or mitigate illness: they straddle the worlds of clinical medicine and public health. This paper focuses on a set of clinical preventive services that are recommended in the USA for adults aged 65 and older, based on their age and gender. These services include immunisations against influenza and pneumococcal disease, and screening for colorectal and breast cancers. We explore opportunities and challenges to enhance the delivery of these interventions, and describe some recently developed models for integrating prevention efforts based in clinician offices and in communities. We also report on a state-level surveillance measure that assesses whether older adults are 'up to date' on this subset of preventive services. To better protect the health of older Americans and change the projected trajectory of medical costs, expanded delivery of recommended vaccinations and disease screenings is likely to remain a focus for both US medicine and public health.     

A clinical trial of tailored office systems for preventive service delivery. The Study to Enhance Prevention by Understanding Practice (STEP-UP).

BACKGROUND: The potential of primary care practice settings to prevent disease and morbidity through health habit counseling, screening for asymptomatic disease, and immunizations has been incompletely met. This study was designed to test a practice-tailored approach to increasing preventive service delivery with particular emphasis on health habit counseling. DESIGN: Group randomized clinical trial and multimethod process assessment. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-seven community family practices in northeast Ohio. INTERVENTION: After a 1-day practice assessment, a nurse facilitator met with practice clinicians and staff and assisted them with choosing and implementing individualized tools and approaches aimed at increasing preventive service delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Summary scores of the health habit counseling, screening and immunization services recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force up to date for consecutive patients during randomly selected chart review days. RESULTS: A significant increase (p=0.015) in global preventive service delivery rates at the 1-year follow-up was found in the intervention group (31% to 42%) compared to the control group (35% to 37%). Rates specifically for health habit counseling (p=0.007) and screening services (p=0.048) were increased, but not for immunizations. CONCLUSIONS: An approach to increasing preventive service delivery that is individualized to meet particular practice needs can increase global preventive service delivery rates.     

Electronic medical records and prevention quality: the prevention index

BACKGROUND: The Prevention Index is a methodology for using electronic medical records to identify and evaluate practice variations in the delivery of preventive care. METHODS: The Prevention Index was used to evaluate the provision of 10 recommended adult preventive services using electronic medical record data for the years 1999 through 2002 among the 450,000 members of a large Northwest integrated care system. The analyses were conducted in 2005. The Prevention Index determines the proportion of person-time that is covered using consensus guidelines as a standard of care. It is analyzed at the population level and produces quality measures at the individual, practice, clinic, and system levels. The Prevention Index also removes diagnostic services in evaluating preventive care. RESULTS: Overall, about 47% of recommended person-time was actually covered by the services in 2002. For nine services with care guidelines, the percent of covered person-time ranged from 19% for chlamydia screening to 80% for blood pressure screening. The percent of recommended person-time covered by these preventive services varied widely across clinical practices. From 17% to 53% of preventive screening tests were delivered for non-screening purposes. CONCLUSIONS: There are wide variations across clinical practices in the adherence to standard prevention guidelines, and also wide variations across different recommended clinical services. The Prevention Index methodology may allow the identification of the source of these variations, allowing system corrections and other remedial actions to be applied precisely and efficiently.     

Are two doctors better than one? Women's physician use and appropriate care.

This study examines nonelderly women's concurrent use of two types of physicians (generalists and obstetrician-gynecologists) for regular health care and associations with receipt of preventive care, including a range of recommended screening, counseling, and heart disease prevention services. Data are from the 1999 Women's Health Care Experiences Survey conducted in Baltimore, Maryland, using random digit dialing (N = 509 women ages 18 to 64). Key findings are: 58% of women report using two physicians (a generalist and an ob/gyn) for regular care; seeing both a generalist and an ob/gyn, compared with seeing a generalist alone, is consistently associated with receiving more clinical preventive services, including screening, counseling, and preventive services related to heart disease. Because seeing an ob/gyn in addition to a generalist physician is associated with receiving recommended preventive services (even for heart disease), the findings suggest that non-elderly women who rely on a generalist alone may receive substandard preventive care. The implications for women's access to ob/gyns and for appropriate design of women's primary care are discussed.     

Self-report of quality of medical student health care

OBJECTIVES: To summarise survey results for the quality of medical students' personal health care, characterise the results according to the demographics and career orientations of the students, and evaluate the relationship between the perceived quality of health care received and the degree of emphasis on prevention in the health care provided. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional study with 2316 medical students in the class of 2003 from 16 medical schools, surveyed at 3 points during their training. We used a self-administered questionnaire designed to assess personal health care and related variables in medical students. RESULTS: The majority (92%) reported receiving health care that was at least good, but only a minority (23%) said they received excellent health care. Half had a regular doctor. Health care quality was rated more highly at Year 1 orientation than at later timepoints by students who had a regular personal doctor, and especially by those with personal doctors who emphasised prevention. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of medical students perceived that they had received health care that was good or better, but most did not believe it was excellent. As the provision of preventive care is important to students, increasing the amount of preventive care provided to students may both increase their personal satisfaction with their health care and model good clinical preventive practices for them.     

Preventive practicum training in healthcare organizations. The Meharry model.

BACKGROUND: Practicum training for preventive medicine residents often occurs in agencies whose community is geographically defined and whose governance is closely linked to public election. We were unsure about the financial ability of such departments to support training and are concerned that over-reliance on traditional health departments might not be best for either medically indigent populations or preventive medicine. We, therefore, sought to apply a public health model--based on a strategic partnership between nursing and preventive medicine--to a large health care organization. The result was formation of a mini-health department, suitable for fully accredited preventive medicine practicum training, within the Alvin C. York Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Murfreesboro, TN. This Center serves a defined population of 21,594 patients and about 1600 employees. The theoretical framework for the new department was based on demonstration of a close fit between the competencies expected of preventive medicine physicians by the American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM) and activities required by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). Because of JCAHO requirements, many healthcare organizations already pay for preventive medicine services. CONCLUSIONS: By placing preventive medicine training faculty into existing budget slots at our institution, systemwide personnel costs for prevention decreased by about $36,000 per year, even as personnel funding for preventive medicine physicians increased from about $24,000 to $376,000 per year. Moreover, there was dramatic, sustained improvement in 17 indicators of preventive care quality as determined by an external peer review organization. In addition to providing a new venue for training, this model may also improve the quality and reach of preventive services, decreased fixed costs for service delivery, and yield new employment opportunities for preventive medicine physicians.     

Broadening the Evidence Base for Evidence-Based Guidelines: A Research Agenda Based on the Work of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Evidence-based evaluations of clinical preventive services help define priorities for research in prevention as part of primary health care. In this article, we draw on our experiences with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) to outline some major areas where research is needed to define the appropriate use of specific screening tests, counseling interventions, immunizations, and chemoprophylaxis. Areas of particular importance included research to: (1) Identify effective and practical primary care interventions for modifying personal health practices of patients, especially around issues such as diet, exercise, alcohol and drug use, and risky sexual behavior; (2) Clarify the optimal periodicity for certain screening tests and counseling interventions; (3) Identify practical ways to allow patients to share decision-making about preventive care, especially for services of possible but uncertain benefit; (4) Examine the most sensitive and efficient ways to identify high-risk groups who may need different services than the average population; and (5) Expand the use of decision-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis to help identify optimal use of clinical preventive services. Given the difficulty of large, prospective trials, we discuss the use of alternative research designs to fill in critical gaps in the evidence for the effectiveness of specific services. Finally, we note several issues of increasing importance that may need to be addressed by future work of the USPSTF: what are the most reliable and effective ways to (1) measure and (2) improve the delivery and quality of preventive care provided in the primary care setting.     

Rural, Urban and Suburban Comparisons of Preventive Services in Family Practice Clinics

Numerous studies have compared health services provided in rural and urban areas, and overall they have found that utilization is lower in rural areas. A significant factor in lower utilization is that rural residents have less access to health services. Much less is known about rural and urban utilization differences once a patient has access to a service provider. This paper focuses on preventive services received when a patient is already in a clinic. Using data from an in-depth qualitative study of 16 family practice clinics in Nebraska, comparisons of physician-specific preventive service rates are made across three geographic categories: rural, urban and suburban. Results from a one-way multivariate analysis of variance show that preventive services rates for nine services examined were as high or higher in rural areas, suggesting that rural health services do not lag for patients with access.