Survey of hospital policies regarding low-molecular-weight heparins.

Hospital policies regarding the use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) were studied. A questionnaire addressing the formulary status of LMWH products, the use of prescribing guidelines, programs for therapeutic interchange, and policies to promote alternatives to LMWHs when appropriate was prepared. The questionnaire was mailed in January 2001 to pharmacy directors at 70 hospitals located in 19 states. All the hospitals were members of a national group purchasing organization. Forty-nine usable responses were received, for a response rate of 70%. Enoxaparin and dalteparin were the LMWH products most likely to be on the respondents' formularies (98% and 29% of hospitals, respectively). About 29% of the hospitals reported having guidelines on the use of LMWHs. Among hospitals that did not, most indicated that they were considering or would like to implement such guidelines. The most commonly cited barrier to the development and implementation of guidelines was lack of pharmacy personnel. Ten percent of the respondents reported having therapeutic-interchange programs for LMWHs. Cited barriers to therapeutic interchange programs included lack of therapeutic equivalence among products and lack of comparable labeled indications. Policies to promote alternatives to LMWHs were reported by 18% of the respondents. A multihospital survey showed that many hospitals wanted but relatively few had prescribing guidelines for LMWHs.     

Cephalosporin-use restrictions in teaching hospitals

A survey of pharmacy directors in teaching hospitals was conducted in March 1983 to ascertain policies for management of cephalosporin use. Surveys were sent to 298 institutions in each of the United States except Alaska. Respondents were asked various questions regarding hospital policies on cephalosporin use. Responses were received from 179 hospitals that had formularies; 99 of these had formal restriction policies, more frequently for second- and third-generation agents than for first-generation agents, and 13 planned to institute restriction policies. In 68% of hospitals with restriction policies, restricted drugs were released only after consultation with the infectious disease service. Chart review was the most frequently reported method of monitoring use of restricted cephalosporins. Approximately 40% of respondents had therapeutic equivalence policies, and more than 40% had recently deleted one or more cephalosporins from the formulary. The percentage of hospitals with formal restriction policies (55%) was greater than in a 1979 survey (32%). Many teaching hospitals have initiated policies to curb rising drug costs associated with the use of cephalosporin antibiotics.     

Survey of formulary system policies and procedures.

A telephone survey was conducted to determine the policies and procedures of hospital formulary systems. Directors of pharmacy at a random sample of 150 community hospitals were interviewed, and letters were sent to each respondent requesting copies of the formulary and drug evaluation form. One hundred thirty hospitals completed the interview (gross response rate of 87%), and 35 evaluation forms and 49 printed formularies were received. Almost all hospitals had a formulary system and a printed formulary; the most frequently stated purposes were to decrease costs and to ensure appropriate therapy. Most formularies received were simple drug lists with no supporting information. The typical pharmacy and therapeutics committee consisted of 11 members, met every month, and reported to the executive committee. About 80% of the responding institutions had formal procedures for considering formulary additions. Less than half had standardized drug evaluation forms. Most hospitals have a formulary system and a printed version of the formulary; however, the formulary often serves primarily as a drug list, with no supporting information.     

Evaluating a restrictive formulary system by assessing nonformulary-drug requests

Nonformulary-drug requests were used to evaluate a restrictive formulary system in a large university hospital, and a telephone survey of eight similar hospitals was conducted to assess the restrictiveness of their formulary systems. Nonformulary-drug requests were evaluated by two drug information pharmacists over a 12-month period (January-December 1984) to assess the frequency with which nonformulary items were ordered, the costs associated with the procurement of nonformulary drug products, and the rationales given by physicians when ordering nonformulary products. Of all nonformulary requests, 65% were for drugs previously evaluated by the pharmacy and therapeutics committee and denied admission to the formulary. A cost savings of $1887 would have resulted if formulary alternates had been used instead of nonformulary products. Excluding 22% of nonformulary items that were requested for the continuation of preadmission drug therapy, only 13% of the rationales for the remaining requests were appropriate. Although the eight other hospitals surveyed said they had restrictive formularies, all had frequent requests and procedures for procuring nonformulary items and some formularies included most available drugs. The formulary system at the study hospital was considered restrictive, but procedures for nonformulary-drug requests limited the effectiveness of the system. If any benefit is to result from formulary systems, hospitals must strengthen their enforcement of formulary restrictions.     

Prevalence and cost savings of therapeutic interchange among U.S. hospitals.

The prevalence and cost savings of therapeutic interchange (TI) among teaching, nonteaching, and investor-owned hospitals in the United States was studied. A survey was sent to all directors of pharmacy at hospitals listed in the 1999 American Hospital Association directory as having more than 100 beds; 463 (29.8%) hospitals responded. The survey elicited data about hospital demographics, the policies and personnel involved in TI, and the estimated cost savings incurred by the use of TI. Eighty-eight percent of teaching, 89% of nonteaching, and 100% of investor-owned hospitals reported having established TI policies and procedures; 88% of responding hospitals reported the use of TI as a means of formulary management. Individuals involved in the decision-making process for TI policies included physicians, pharmacists, and pharmacy and therapeutics committee members. Most responding hospitals reported having an automatic interchange procedure, and few required physician consent before the substitution was made. The most commonly substituted medication classes were histamine H2-receptor antagonists, proton-pump inhibitors, antacids, and quinolones. Differences in TI procedures and the medication classes commonly substituted were not significant between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. The annual dollar savings was estimated by 36% of teaching, 38% of nonteaching, and 50% of investor-owned hospitals and determined by record keeping in 18% of teaching, 20% of nonteaching, and 40% of investor-owned hospitals. Eighty-eight percent of teaching, 89% of nonteaching, and 100% of investor-owned hospitals have established TI policies. Significant variation in cost savings occurred when hospitals attempted to estimate the annual dollar savings, as no adequate commercially available software exists to perform this task.     

Effect of Misalignment between Hospital and Provincial Formularies on Medication Discrepancies at Discharge: PPITS (Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapeutic Substitution) Study

Background

Medication discrepancies may occur on admission, transfer, or discharge from hospital. Therapeutic interchange within a drug class is a common practice in hospitals, and orders for specific proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often substituted with the hospital’s formulary PPI through therapeutic interchange protocols. Rabeprazole is the PPI on the formulary of the British Columbia PharmaCare program. However, different PPIs may appear on the formularies of the province’s hospitals. This misalignment and use of therapeutic interchange may lead to increased rates of medication discrepancies at the time of discharge.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of formulary misalignment for PPIs between St Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver and the British Columbia PharmaCare program and use of therapeutic interchange on the occurrence of medication discrepancies at discharge.

Methods

A cohort chart review was performed to compare discharge discrepancy rates for PPI orders between 2 periods: June 2006 to June 2008, when the same PPI appeared on the hospital and provincial formularies, and July 2008 to July 2010, when the designated PPIs differed between the hospital and provincial formularies. Data for the first study period were used to establish the baseline discharge discrepancy rate, and data for the later period represented the discharge discrepancy rate in the presence of misalignment between the hospital and PharmaCare formularies.

Results

The discharge discrepancy rate for PPIs was 27.3% (24/88) when the 2 formularies were aligned and 49.1% (81/165) when the formularies were misaligned. This represents an absolute increase of 21.8 percentage points in the risk of discharge discrepancies (95% confidence interval 9.8–33.9 percentage points; p < 0.001) when the hospital and provincial formularies were misaligned and the hospital’s therapeutic interchange protocol was used.

Conclusions

Misalignment between the PPIs specified in the hospital and provincial formularies, combined with use of therapeutic interchange, was associated with a significant increase in medication discrepancies at discharge.     

Herbal products: behaviors and beliefs among Italian women

PURPOSE: The use of phytotherapy is growing worldwide, but the popular perception is that this kind of approach is natural and therefore safer than traditional medicine; for this reason the use is frequently not communicated to the doctor. Instead, even if many herbal remedies are benign in nature, some of these therapies have potentially harmful side effects or adverse interactions with other medications. So, the purpose of our study was to analyze the behavior patterns and decision-making modalities about herbal remedy use among a sample of Italian women. METHODS: During a 5-month period, interviews to women attending the outpatient ambulatory of an urban university general hospital were made on the basis of a pre-structured 25-item questionnaire. RESULTS: Among a random study population of 1,044 subsequent patients, 491 women (47.03%) reported to have been taking one or more herbal products in the last year, sometimes used during pregnancy or given to their children (35.23%). The 10 most frequently used herbal products reported were propolis, aloe, valerian root, blueberry, fennel, dandelion, mallow, arnica, thyme, and Echinacea. The major purposes for using these products were to stimulate the immune system and to cure respiratory problems. 47/491 (9.57%) women reported side effects, but only 36% referred to the doctor. In most of the cases, herbal products were taken in combination with drugs (44.61%) or homeopathic treatments (11.81%). The majority of our women did not obtain information about this kind of therapy from a health care provider (72.71%). CONCLUSIONS: The present survey highlights the general use of phytomedicines by a sample of Italian women, the potential risk of their confidence with the 'natural world,' and the lack of discussion on this argument with doctors and pharmacists. This suggests the importance of training for health care providers and the need of informational programs for consumers.     

Drug product management in health maintenance organizations.

A national mail survey of drug product management in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) is described. The survey covered 570 HMOs--502 by questionnaires mailed to pharmacy directors at individual independent and multistate HMOs and 68 represented by six executives of multistate HMOs who agreed to report aggregate data for their HMO operations. Responses for 180 individual HMOs were received (36% response rate); four of the six multistate HMO executives returned aggregate data. Individual HMO respondents reported using the following methods of drug product management: formularies, 66% (of these, 60% reported using a restrictive formulary or a restrictive formulary with exceptions); MACs, 54%; prior authorization, 44%; contracts for co-marketed and single-source drug entities, 46% for each. Almost all HMOs with contracts also had exclusive or preferred status for dispensing or reimbursement of some drug products. Most HMOs received discounts, manufacturer's value-added services, price protection, rebates based on market share, and rebates based on use as contract incentives; discounts and rebates based on use were chosen as the most preferred incentives. Established methods of drug product management, such as formularies and MACs, were most commonly reported by HMOs; however, nearly half reported using new approaches, including contracts with manufacturers, incentives, such as discounts and rebates based on use, and exclusive or preferred status.     

Medication management in English National Health Service hospitals.

PURPOSE: The methods currently used by English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals to manage the use of medicines were studied. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to directors of pharmacy at all English NHS hospitals in May 2001. RESULTS: The response rate was 57% (157/ 275). Sixty-six percent of the responding hospitals provided general acute care services, and 34% provided mental health services. About 1 responder in 5 (19%) was a specialty hospital functioning either as a freestanding institution or alongside other hospitals. The average total expenditure by the hospital trusts was pound 94 million (dollar 175 million), of which drugs accounted for pound 3.5 million (dollar 6.5 million). Many hospitals either had formularies or were constructing them (86%), and most hospitals used a process to manage the introduction of new medicines. About three fourths of the hospitals had < or = 20 pharmacist full-time equivalents. The implementation of national guidelines was variable, although some of this variation may have been due to differences in service provision. Few hospitals were actively monitoring compliance with guidelines (31%), but audits of current care were common (72%). CONCLUSION: A survey of English NHS hospitals provided information on pharmacy staffing, drug expenditures, and measures taken to ensure rational medication use.     

Drug and Therapeutics Committees in Danish Hospitals: A Survey of Organization,Activities and Drug Selection Procedures

To implement rational pharmacotherapy in hospitals, it is important to develop, implement and evaluate hospital drug formularies (HDFs). A report from Denmark recommended standardizing activities of the drug and therapeutics committees (DTCs) in Denmark, but little is known about their current organization. The aim of the study was to describe the organization of DTCs in Denmark, how HDFs are developed and implemented, and to what extent policies that support the use of HDFs exist. A questionnaire was developed based on previous research and guidelines and contained 20 questions, which were divided into the following subjects: structure, activities, drug selection and implementation. The questionnaire was sent to the chairmen of the nine DTCs in Denmark. The response rate was 100% (9/9). The DTCs varied in structure and activities; meetings were held between 2 and 6 times annually, and the duration of the meetings lasted between 1 and 2.5 hr. Eight (89%) DTCs developed HDFs, policies and guidelines (P&Gs) that supported the use of HDFs. Eight (89%) had established criteria for inclusion of drugs on the HDFs, and seven had developed criteria for generic substitution and therapeutic interchange. The number of trade names on the HDFs varied between 116 and 1195. The nine DTCs in Denmark varied considerably regarding structure and activity. The main activity was to develop formularies, and most of the committees developed policies that supported medication use.     

Antibiotic prescribing for lower respiratory tract infections within secondary care

□ A systematic content analysis of the treatment guidelines for lower respiratory tract infection was performed on antibiotic formularies and policies obtained from hospital management units within the West Midlands and university hospitals from the rest of the United Kingdom □ Analysis of antibiotic formularies and policies demonstrated considerable variation between prescribing guidelines with regard both to the agents and dosages used □ A proportion of hospitals in the West Midlands and university hospitals from the rest of the UK gave no guidance regarding drug dosages, which may result in wide variations in therapy □ These findings have important consequences for quality of patient care, drug budget management and antibiotic resistance     

Pharmacy practice in hospital settings in GCC countries: Prescribing and transcribing

PurposeTo outline hospital pharmacy practices across the Gulf Cooperation Councils (GCC) countries’ hospitals.MethodsA modified survey questionnaire was prepared from the original 2019 American Society of Health-System Pharmacist (ASHP) survey questions. Survey details were discussed with some pharmacy directors for clarity and relevance. A list of hospitals were obtained from the Ministry of Health of each of the targeted GCC countries. A secure invitation link containing a survey questionnaire was sent to the participants directly.ResultsSixty four hospitals responded to this survey. The overall response rate was 52%. About 47% of the surveyed hospitals considered their drug formularies as closed, and strict. Additionally, only 44% of hospitals compare the effectiveness of products, when taking formulary decisions for drug inclusion. Forty-four percent of hospitals have computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE / EHR) system functionality for formulary system management. At about 39.1% hospitals, pharmacists have the responsibility for managing medication therapies, majority were engaged in providing anticoagulation therapies. About 61% of hospital pharmacies in GCC countries receive medication orders electronically, through CPOE/EHR. Majority (66%) of the hospitals in GCC countries have an active Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) while only 40% of pharmacists have a key role in providing clinical support. About 57.8% of hospital pharmacy directors reported that pharmacists do not provide ambulatory care clinical pharmacy services in their hospitals.ConclusionIn GCC countries’ hospitals, there are major areas for improvement to patient care of which pharmacists are uniquely qualified as the medication experts to have the most meaningful outcomes in all of the domains of safe medication use, medication therapy management, antimicrobial stewardship program and participation in outpatient clinics.     

ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: prescribing and transcribing--2004.

PURPOSE: Results of the 2004 ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings that pertain to prescribing and transcribing are presented. METHODS: A stratified random sample of pharmacy directors at 1183 general and children's medical-surgical hospitals in the United States was surveyed by mail. SMG Marketing Group, Inc., supplied data on hospital characteristics; the survey sample was drawn from SMG's hospital database. RESULTS: The response rate was 41.7%. Compared with the results of the 2001 survey, the number of times pharmacy and therapeutics committees met increased, suggesting an increase in efforts to monitor and manage medication use in hospitals. There was an increase in the use of quality-of-life information to make formulary decisions, indicating a shift away from cost-based formularies. There was a decrease in the rates of formulary compliance, but an increase in the use of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, suggesting the emergence of more comprehensive approaches to improving prescribing. The use of medication-use evaluations increased in smaller hospitals, suggesting greater use of best practices is occurring in these institutions. The use of drug information services continues to decline, as the use of more efficient and easily accessible online sources of drug information increases. Reading back oral orders to improve accuracy dramatically increased since 2001. The adoption of computerized prescriber-order-entry systems continues to be slow, with fewer than 5% of hospitals reporting their use. CONCLUSION: The 2004 ASHP survey results indicate that pharmacists are continuing to improve medication use at the prescribing and transcribing steps of the medication-use system.     

Observations on the use of ready-to-use and point-of-care activated parenteral products in automated dispensing cabinets in U.S. hospitals.

PURPOSE: The use of ready-to-use (RTU) and point-of-care (POC) activated parenteral products and their storage in automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) in U.S. hospitals were evaluated. METHODS: A survey on the use of RTU and POC activated parenteral products, including storage and dispensing of the products, was developed and sent electronically to hospital pharmacy administrators. Survey respondents were identified using the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists' member database. RESULTS: Of the 4070 surveys sent, 965 (23.7%) were completed and returned. Most pharmacy administrators (94.7%) reported that their institution used some form of RTU and POC activated parenteral product, with 74% using ADCs to dispense these products. Efficiency was the most common reason cited for storage of RTU and POC activated products in ADCs. Facilities varied on reasons for not implementing this technology, with 47 facilities citing implementation costs, limited number of RTU and POC activated products on the hospital's formulary, lack of available pediatric formulations, and safety concerns as the main reasons. More than half of respondents noted space limitations as the greatest challenge to adding RTU and POC activated products to ADCs. CONCLUSION: Nearly three fourths of survey respondents reported using RTU and POC products in conjunction with ADCs; however, the approach to including these products in ADCs varied based on the characteristics, policies, and preferences of the individual facility. Advantages of RTU and POC products identified by respondents included enhanced safety benefits, increased dispensing efficiency, cost avoidance due to reduced waste, and improved compliance with federal and state regulations.     

A cross-sectional survey of the profile and activities of Antimicrobial Management Teams in Irish Hospitals

Background Surveillance of antimicrobial prescribing, in order to control the increase in antimicrobial resistance, is recommended by the Guidelines for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Hospitals in Ireland. Objective The objective of the study is to determine the profile and activities of Antimicrobial Management Teams (AMTs) in Irish Hospitals by surveying hospital pharmacists. Setting: Hospitals in Ireland. Method A self-completion postal questionnaire was developed from a recent study conducted by members of the authoring team in the United Kingdom, adapted for the Irish context. It was issued to all hospitals in Ireland (n = 70). Differences in responses, using Pearson’s Chi squared tests, were evaluated between public and private hospitals to determine whether the funding category had an effect on activities. Main outcome measures: (1) A profile of AMTs in Ireland. (2) The presence and content of antimicrobial prescribing policies and how adherence to the policies is measured. Results The response rate was 73 % (n = 51, 71 % public). 57 % (29/51) of hospitals have an antimicrobial management team in place with 93 % (27/29) having a Consultant Medical Microbiologist, 24 % (7/29) having a Consultant in Infectious Diseases and 69 % (20/29) having an Antimicrobial Pharmacist. There is an antimicrobial prescribing policy in place in 88 % (45/51) of hospitals responding. 80 % (36/51) of replies report that the volume of antibiotics prescribed is monitored, 47 % (24/51) conduct audits to measure appropriateness of all antibiotics prescribed and 43 % (22/51) conduct audits of appropriate prescribing of restricted antibiotics. Public hospitals were significantly more likely than private hospitals to review the volume of antibiotics prescribed (p = 0.021) and to audit the appropriateness of restricted antibiotics use (p = 0.003). A lack of resources was reported as the main barrier to antimicrobial surveillance by hospital pharmacists. Conclusion Around half of Irish hospitals do not have an antimicrobial management team in place but most hospitals have an antimicrobial prescribing policy. Most AMTs have representation by Consultants and Pharmacists, but audit and feedback of antibiotic prescribing activities is limited. Significant differences in audit activities were found between public and private hospitals, with private hospitals performing less well.     

National survey of recent changes in hospital policies on pharmaceutical sales representatives' activities

Data from a national survey of recent changes in hospital policies on the activities of pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSRs) are presented. Data were collected by means of a mail survey sent in October 1985 to pharmacy directors of 857 randomly selected hospitals. The questionnaire asked them to identify recent (since 1983) and anticipated changes in restrictions on policies concerning products that PSRs are permitted to detail and sample, persons with whom PSRs can have business contact, requirements for drug exhibits and displays, and areas where PSRs can detail products. Respondents also were asked to describe which PSR services they found to be most useful, which services they would like to see discontinued, and what new services they would like PSRs to provide. Data from 446 of 451 (52.2%) returned questionnaires were included in the analysis. For each of the four policy areas, approximately one fifth of the directors indicated that changes had been made during the previous two years, and nearly all of the changes involved increased restrictions. Half of the respondents reported that their hospitals planned to increase restrictions on products that PSRs would be permitted to detail or sample. The most common reason given for anticipated policy changes was a desire to improve control of the formulary. The directors viewed information about new products as the most useful PSR service, most directors wanted PSRs to discontinue sampling or excessive sampling, and most desired greater educational support from PSRs. From late 1983 to 1986, approximately 20% of hospitals had increased restrictions on the activities of PSRs, and many of the respondents anticipated further increases in restrictions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Safety implications regarding use of phytomedicines

Objective Since the approach of the general population to phytomedicine is that the therapy therapy is natural and therefore safe, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the use of herbal compounds, alone or in combination with traditional drugs, and the appearance of side-effects among a sample of Italian women. Methods Our research was conducted over a 5–month period in the outpatient ambulatories of an urban university general hospital. The sample population consisted of women who were interviewed about phytotherapy use on the basis of a pre-structured questionnaire. Results Among 1,063 women contacted, 1,044 completed the interview and 491 (47%) reported taking at least one herbal compound in the last year; 272 women (55.4%) consumed only phytomedicines, while 219 (44.6%) also took traditional drugs. Seventy-three different herbal products were used, 32 were consumed in association with traditional drugs. Forty-seven of 491 (9.6%) women reported side-effects, 22 after taking only phytomedicines (8.1%), 25 in combination with traditional drugs (11.4%). The observed adverse manifestations included the following: gastrointestinal after dandelion, propolis or fennel; cardiovascular after liquorice, ginseng, and green tea; dermatological after propolis, thyme, arnica, and passionflower; and neurological after guarana and liquorice. Drugs taken in association and potentially involved in adverse reactions were NSAIDs, antibiotics, benzodiazepines, antihypertensives and oral contraceptives. In some cases (n=5), side-effects were so serious to justify an admission to the hospital. In 29/47 of cases (61.7%), the adverse reaction was not communicated to the doctor. Conclusions Our data confirm that herbal products are largely taken on a self-treatment basis, and users have the convinction that these therapies are natural and therefore safe.