Multisite reproducibility of the Etest MIC method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates.

A multicenter study was performed to establish the interlaboratory reproducibility of Etest, to provide an additional comparison of Etest MICs with reference broth macrodilution MICs, and to develop some tentative quality control (QC) guidelines for using Etest for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. Two QC strains, Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258, were tested by Etest against amphotericin B, fluconazole, flucytosine, itraconazole, and ketoconazole in each of four laboratories. The QC strains were tested 20 times each against the five antifungal agents by using a common lot of RPMI agar. A total of 80 MICs per drug per strain were generated during the study. Overall, 98 to 100% of the MICs fell within a 3 log2 dilution range for the respective yeast-antifungal agent combinations. The level of agreement of Etest MICs with broth macrodilution MICs was 86 to 100% with amphotericin B (C. krusei and C. parapsilosis), itraconazole (C. krusei and C. parapsilosis), flucytosine (C. parapsilosis), and fluconazole (C. parapsilosis). A lower level of agreement was observed with ketoconazole (C. krusei and C. parapsilosis). Although all participants reported identical Etest MICs, the MICs of flucytosine and fluconazole when tested against C. krusei fell well above the upper limits of the reference range for this strain. The tentative QC limits for the two QC strains and five antifungal agents when tested by the Etest methodology are the same as the QC limits when tested by the reference broth macrodilution method for amphotericin B and C. krusei, itraconazole and C. krusei, flucytosine and C. parapsilosis, fluconazole and C. parapsilosis, and itraconazole and C. parapsilosis. The Etest QC ranges are 1 dilution broader (4-dilution range) than the reference macrodilution method QC ranges for ketoconazole and C. krusei, amphotericin B and C. parapsilosis, and ketoconazole and C. parapsilosis.     

Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests.

A collaborative comparison of macro- and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests was performed in five laboratories. MICs of amphotericin B, fluconazole, flucytosine, and ketoconazole were determined in all five centers against 95 coded isolates of Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, and Torulopsis glabrata. A standard protocol with the following National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing recommendations was used: an inoculum standardized by spectrophotometer, buffered (RPMI 1640) medium (pH 7.0), incubation at 35 degrees C, and an additive drug dilution procedure. Two inoculum sizes were tested (1 x 10(4) to 5 x 10(3) to 2.5 x 10(3) CFU/ml) and three scoring criteria were evaluated for MIC endpoint determinations, which were scored as 0 (optically clear), < or = 1 (slightly hazy turbidity), and < or = 2 (prominent decrease in turbidity compared with that of the growth control). Overall intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility was optimal with the low-density inoculum, the second-day readings, and MICs scored as either 1 or 2. The microdilution MICs demonstrated interlaboratory agreement with most of the four drugs higher than or similar to that of the macrodilution MICs. In general, there was good interlaboratory agreement with amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine; ketoconazole gave more variable results.     

In vitro susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi: comparison of Etest and reference microdilution methods for determining itraconazole MICs

The performance of the Etest for itraconazole susceptibility testing of 50 isolates of filamentous fungi was assessed in comparison with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) proposed standard microdilution broth method. The NCCLS method employed RPMI 1640 broth medium, and MICs were read after incubation for 48 h at 35 degrees C. Etest MICs were determined with RPMI agar containing 2% glucose and with Casitone agar and were read after incubation for 24 h (Aspergillus spp. and Rhizopus spp.) and 48 h (all species except Rhizopus spp.) at 35 degrees C. The isolates included Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus terreus, Fusarium spp., Pseudallescheria boydii, Rhizopus spp., Paecilomyces variotii, and an Acremonium sp. Overall agreement between Etest and microdilution MICs was 96% with RPMI agar and 80% with Casitone agar. The agreement was 100% for all species except Rhizopus spp. (83%) and Paecilomyces varioti (0%) with RPMI agar. When Casitone agar was used, the agreement ranged from 50% with Rhizopus spp. to 100% with Fusarium spp., P. boydii, P. varioti, and an Acremonium sp. Notably, for Aspergillus spp., the agreement between itraconazole Etest MICs read at 24 h and reference microdilution MICs read at 48 h was 100% with both RPMI and Casitone agar. Both media supported the growth of all filamentous fungi tested. Where a discrepancy was observed between Etest and the reference method, the Etest MIC was generally higher. The Etest method using RPMI agar appears to be a useful method for determining itraconazole susceptibilities of Aspergillus spp. and other filamentous fungi.     

First report of Cryptococcus laurentii meningitis and a fatal case of Cryptococcus albidus cryptococcaemia in AIDS patients.

We report the first case of Cryptococcus laurentii meningitis and a rare case of Cryptococcus albidus cryptococcaemia in AIDS patients. Both infections were treated with amphotericin B and flucytosine. The C. laurentii meningitis was controlled after 2 weeks of treatment with no evidence of infection 20 months later. The patient with C. albidus cryptococcaemia, despite the amphotericin B/flucytosine combination therapy, died on the 14th day of treatment. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for C. laurentii, as determined by Etest on RPMI 1640 agar, were 0.25 microg ml(-1) of amphotericin B, 1.25 microg ml(-1) flucytosine, 4 microg ml(-1) fluconazole, 0.50 microg ml(-1) itraconazole and 1.0 microg ml(-1) of ketoconazole. The MIC of amphotericin B for C. albidus was 0.5 microg ml(-1), flucytosine 1.25 microg ml(-1), fluzonazole 4 microg ml(-1), itraconazole 0.5 microg ml(-1) and ketonazole 0.25 microg ml(-1). The agreement of the amphotericin B MIC values obtained in antibiotic medium 3 by the broth microdilution method, with those obtained on casitone medium by Etest, was within a two-dilution range for both isolates. C. laurentii may cause meningitis and may also involve the lungs in AIDS patients.     

Comparative evaluation of three antifungal susceptibility test methods for Candida albicans isolates and correlation with response to fluconazole therapy.

In vitro susceptibilities were determined for 56 Candida albicans isolates obtained from the oral cavities of 41 patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. The agents tested included fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, flucytosine, and amphotericin B. MICs were determined by the broth microdilution technique following National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards document M27-P (M27-P micro), a broth microdilution technique using high-resolution medium (HR micro), and the Etest with solidified yeast-nitrogen base agar. The in vitro findings were correlated with in vivo response to fluconazole therapy for oropharyngeal candidiasis. For all C. albicans isolates from patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis not responding to fluconazole MICs were found to be > or = 6.25 micrograms/ml by the M27-P micro method and > or = 25 micrograms/ml by the HR micro method as well as the Etest. However, for several C. albicans isolates from patients who responded to fluconazole therapy MICs found to be above the suggested breakpoints of resistance. The appropriate rank order of best agreement between the M27-P micro method and HR micro method was amphotericin B > fluconazole > flucytosine > ketoconazole > itraconazole. The appropriate rank order with best agreement between the M27-P micro method and the Etest was flucytosine > amphotericin B > fluconazole > ketoconazole > or = itraconazole. It could be concluded that a good correlation between in vitro resistance and clinical failure was found with all methods. However, the test methods used in this study did not necessarily predict clinical response to therapy with fluconazole.     

Evaluation of the E Test for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida glabrata

 The E test was compared to the reference NCCLS broth macrodilution method for susceptibility testing of Candida (Torulopsis) glabrata. The MICs of amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole and itraconazole were determined using the appropriate culture media (RPMI 1640 agar with 2% glucose, Casitone agar or Antibiotic Medium 3 agar) according to the drug tested. Agreement between the two methods was within plus/minus two dilutions for 77–100% of test results, according to the drug/medium combination. The study revealed problems in determining the MICs of azoles using the E test, and confirmed the suitability of Casitone agar for susceptibility testing of fluconazole even if results were read within 24 h.     

Evaluation of Etest for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures

The performance of the Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures was compared with that of the macrodilution method for determining the MICs of five antifungal agents. Culture broths with blood from bottles positive for yeasts were inoculated directly onto plates for susceptibility testing with the Etest, and the MICs were read after 24 and 48 h of incubation. A total of 141 positive blood cultures (72 cultures of Candida albicans, 31 of Candida tropicalis, 14 of Candida glabrata, 11 of Candida parapsilosis, 3 of Candida krusei, and 3 of Cryptococcus neoformans, 4 miscellaneous yeast species, and 3 mixed cultures) were tested, and the rates of MIC agreement (+/-1 log(2) dilution) between the direct Etest (at 24 and 48 h, respectively) and macrodilution methods were as follows: amphotericin B, 81.8 and 93.5%; flucytosine, 84.8 and 87.7%; fluconazole, 89.4 and 85.5%; itraconazole, 69.7 and 63.8%; ketoconazole, 87.9 and 79.0%. By a large-sample t test, the difference in log(2) dilution between the direct Etest and the macrodilution method was found to be small (P < 0.05). The lone exceptions were ketoconazole at 48 h of incubation and itraconazole at both 24 and 48 h of incubation (P > 0.05). By Tukey's multiple comparisons, the difference between the direct Etest (48 h) and reference methods among different species was found to be less than 1 log(2) dilution. When the MICs were translated into interpretive susceptibility, the minor errors caused by the direct Etest (at 24 and 48 h, respectively) were as follows: flucytosine, 2.3 and 1.4%; fluconazole, 3.0 and 3.6%; itraconazole, 21.2 and 21.3%. Itraconazole also produced an additional 3.0 and 3.6% major errors as determined by the direct Etest at 24 and 48 h, respectively. It was concluded that, except for itraconazole, the Etest method was feasible for direct susceptibility testing of blood cultures positive for yeasts. The method is simple, and the results could be read between 24 and 48 h after direct inoculation, whenever the inhibition zones were discernible.     

Interlaboratory evaluation of the Etest for antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes.

A three-site interlaboratory reproducibility evaluation of the Etest concentration gradient strip method for testing antifungal susceptibilities was conducted using 30 strains of dermatophytes exposed to strips loaded with ketoconazole (KTZ), itraconazole (ITZ), amphotericin B (AMB) and fluconazole (FCZ). Etest minimal inhibitory concentrations were compared with those obtained using a broth microdilution method. All isolates produced clearly detectable growth at 28 degrees C within 72-96 h for reading with the Etest method. The highest interlaboratory agreement between Etest and the microdilution method was shown with FCZ (94%), and the lowest was seen with KTZ (60%). Overall, agreement between the Etest and microdilution method was variable. It was excellent for AMB (97%), good for ITZ (80%) and KTZ (77%), and low for fluconazole (27%).     

Use of fatty acid RPMI 1640 media for testing susceptibilities of eight Malassezia species to the new triazole posaconazole and to six established antifungal agents by a modified NCCLS M27-A2 microdilution method and Etest

A novel formulation of RPMI 1640 medium for susceptibility testing of Malassezia yeasts by broth microdilution (BMD) and Etest is proposed. A modification of the NCCLS M27-A2 BMD method was used to test 53 isolates of Malassezia furfur (12 isolates), M. sympodialis (8 isolates), M. slooffiae (4 isolates), M. globosa (22 isolates), M. obtusa (2 isolates), M. restricta (2 isolates), M. pachydermatis (1 isolates), and M. dermatis (2 isolates) against amphotericin B, ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, terbinafine, and posaconazole by BMD and Etest. RPMI and antibiotic medium 3 (AM3) were supplemented with glucose, bile salts, a mixture of fatty acids, and n-octadecanoate fatty acids and Tween 20. M. furfur ATCC 14521 and M. globosa ATCC 96807 were used as quality control strains. Depending on the species, MICs were read after 48 or 72 h of incubation at 32 degrees C. Low azole and terbinafine MICs were recorded for all Malassezia species, whereas amphotericin B displayed higher MICs (>/=16 microg/ml) against M. furfur, M. restricta, M. globosa, and M. slooffiae strains, which were AM3 confirmed. Agreement of the two methods was 84 to 97%, and intraclass correlation coefficients were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Because of higher amphotericin B MICs provided by Etest for strains also displaying high BMD MICs (>/=1 microg/ml), agreement was poorer. The proposed media are used for the first time and can support optimum growth of eight Malassezia species for recording concordant BMD and Etest MICs.     

Evaluation of a capacitance method for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures

The feasibility of using a capacitance method (CM) for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures was evaluated. The CM used the same test conditions as those recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. After direct inoculation of positive culture broths into module wells (Bactometer; bioMérieux, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.), the end-point determination was made by monitoring the capacitance change in the culture broths with Bactometer. The MIC of amphotericin B was the lowest concentration at which yeast growth was completely inhibited, while the MICs of ketoconazole, flucytosine, and fluconazole were the concentrations at which a >/=80% reduction in capacitance change was observed. The MICs of the four drugs against each blood isolate obtained on subculture plates were also determined by the macrodilution method. For 51 positive blood cultures tested, the percent agreement (+/-2 log(2) dilutions) between the CM and the macrodilution method were as follows: amphotericin B (98%), ketoconazole (92%), flucytosine (84%), and fluconazole (96%). The CM was further used for breakpoint susceptibility testing of fluconazole (8 and 64 microg/ml) and flucytosine (4 and 32 microg/ml) against yeasts in positive blood cultures. After testing of 74 specimens by the CM, flucytosine and fluconazole produced one (1.4%) major error and two (2.8%) minor errors, respectively. All yeasts that displayed resistance to flucytosine or fluconazole were detected within 24 h after direct inoculation of the positive broths into Bactometer. The CM may be useful for the rapid detection of antifungal resistance in positive blood cultures containing yeasts.     

Evaluation of the E test for fluconazole susceptibility testing ofCandida albicans isolates from oropharyngeal candidiasis

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of the E test in determining the antifungal susceptibility ofCandida albicans. Reproducibility of the E test was determined for amphotericin B, fluconazole, and itraconazole using three different solid media: RPMI 1640, Casitone, and yeast nitrogen base agar. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were comparable (results at ±2 dilutions) in 92% of the tests for amphotericin B and in 100% for fluconazole and itraconazole. Determination of MIC endpoints was easiest on Casitone agar.Candida albicans isolates from 23 patients undergoing fluconazole therapy for oropharyngeal candidiasis were tested for fluconazole susceptibility. Good correlation was obtained between the MICs of fluconazole and clinical outcome. Clinical failure was associated with strains for which MICs were 48 g/ml. These results suggest that the E test has potential utility for fluconazole susceptibility testing of clinical yeast isolates.     

Evaluation of Etest method for determining fluconazole and voriconazole MICs for 279 clinical isolates of Candida species infrequently isolated from blood

The performance of Etest in fluconazole and voriconazole testing of 279 isolates of uncommon Candida spp. was assessed in comparison with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)-approved standard broth microdilution (BMD) method. The NCCLS method employed RPMI 1640 broth medium, and MICs were read after incubation for 48 h at 35 degrees C. Etest MICs were determined with RPMI agar containing 2% glucose and were read after incubation for 48 h at 35 degrees C. The isolates include Candida krusei, C. lusitaniae, C. guilliermondii, C. kefyr, C. rugosa, C. lipolytica, C. pelliculosa, C. dubliniensis, C. famata, C. zeylanoides, C. inconspicua, and C. norvegensis. Overall agreement between Etest and BMD MICs was 96% for fluconazole and 95% for voriconazole. Where a discrepancy was observed between Etest and the reference method, the Etest tended to give lower values with both fluconazole and voriconazole. The Etest method using RPMI agar appears to be a useful method for determining fluconazole and voriconazole susceptibilities of uncommon species of Candida.     

Evaluation of the Etest and disk diffusion methods for determining susceptibilities of 235 bloodstream isolates of Candida glabrata to fluconazole and voriconazole

The performances of the Etest and the disk diffusion methods for testing of the susceptibilities of 235 Candida glabrata isolates to fluconazole and voriconazole were compared with that of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) approved standard broth microdilution (BMD) method. The NCCLS method used RPMI 1640 broth medium, and MICs were read after incubation for 48 h at 35 degrees C. Etest MICs were determined with RPMI 1640 agar containing 2% glucose (RPG agar) and with Mueller-Hinton agar containing 2% glucose and 0.5 microg of methylene blue per ml (MBE agar) and were read after incubation for 48 h at 35 degrees C. Disk diffusion testing was performed with MBE agar, 25-microg fluconazole disks, and 1- microg voriconazole disks and by incubation at 35 degrees C for 24 h. Overall agreements between the Etest and the BMD MICs obtained with RPG and MBE agars were 91 and 96%, respectively, for fluconazole and 93 and 95%, respectively, for voriconazole. Categorical agreements between the agar-based methods and BMD were 52.3 to 64.7% with fluconazole and 94.8 to 97.4% with voriconazole. The vast majority of the discrepancies by the disk diffusion and Etest methods with fluconazole were minor errors. The agar-based methods performed well in identifying isolates with resistance to fluconazole and decreased susceptibility to voriconazole.     

Quality control guidelines for National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards--recommended broth macrodilution testing of ketoconazole and itraconazole.

Ketoconazole and itraconazole were tested in a multilaboratory study to establish quality control (QC) guidelines for yeast antifungal susceptibility testing. Two isolates that had been previously identified as QC isolates for amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine (Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258) were tested in accordance with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-P guidelines. Each isolate was tested 20 times with the two antifungal agents in the five laboratories by using a lot of RPMI 1640 unique to each laboratory as well as a lot common to all five laboratories, thus generating 200 MICs per drug per organism. Overall, 96 to 99% of the MICs for each drug fell within the desired 3-log2 dilution range (mode +/- 1 log2 dilution). By using these data, 3-log2 dilution QC ranges encompassing 98% of the observed MICs for three of the organism-drug combinations and 94% of the observed MICs for the fourth combination were established. These QC ranges are 0.064 to 0.25 micrograms/ml for both ketoconazole and itraconazole against C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and 0.125 to 0.5 micrograms/ml for both ketoconazole and itraconazole against C. krusei ATCC 6258.     

Evaluation of Etest method for determining voriconazole and amphotericin B MICs for 162 clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans

The performance of the Etest for voriconazole and amphotericin B susceptibility testing of 162 isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans was assessed against the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) broth microdilution method. The NCCLS method employed RPMI 1640 broth medium, and MICs were read after incubation for 72 h at 35 degrees C. MICs were determined by Etest for all 162 isolates with RPMI 1640 agar containing 2% glucose (RPG agar) and were read after incubation for 72 h at 35 degrees C. The Etest results for both voriconazole and amphotericin B correlated well with reference MICs. Agreement was 94% for voriconazole and 99% for amphotericin B. When discrepancy was noted between the results obtained by Etest and broth microdilution for voriconazole, the Etest generally provided a higher MIC. The Etest method using RPG agar appears to be a useful method for determining the susceptibility of C. neoformans to voriconazole and amphotericin B.     

In vitro susceptibility testing of Aspergillus spp.: comparison of Etest and reference microdilution methods for determining voriconazole and itraconazole MICs

The performance of the Etest for voriconazole and for itraconazole susceptibility testing of 376 isolates of Aspergillus spp. was assessed in comparison with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) proposed standard microdilution broth method. The NCCLS method employed RPMI 1640 broth medium, and MICs were read after incubation for 48 h at 35 degrees C. Etest MICs were determined with RPMI agar containing 2% glucose and were read after incubation for 48 h at 35 degrees C. The isolates included A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. niger, A. terreus, A. versicolor, A. glaucus, A. nidulans, A. ustus, and A. sydowii. Overall agreement percentages between the Etest and microdilution MICs were 97.6% for voriconazole and 95.8% for itraconazole. Where a discrepancy was observed between Etest and the reference method, the Etest tended to give lower values with voriconazole and higher values with itraconazole. The Etest method using RPMI agar appears to be a useful method for determining the voriconazole and itraconazole susceptibilities of Aspergillus spp.     

In vitro activities of voriconazole and five licensed antifungal agents against Candida dubliniensis: comparison of CLSI M27-A2, Sensititre YeastOne, disk diffusion, and Etest methods

We compared the in vitro activity of six antifungal agents against 62 isolates of Candida dubliniensis by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI [formerly National Committee for the Clinical Laboratory Standards]) M27-A2, Sensititre YeastOne, disk diffusion, and Etest methods and we studied the effect of the time of reading. For the azoles, voriconazole was the most potent in vitro followed by fluconazole, ketoconazole, and itraconazole. All the isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B and flucytosine. The highest rate of resistance was obtained against itraconazole with a high number of isolates defined as susceptible dose-dependent. At 24 hr, 100% of the isolates were susceptible to ketoconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine, 98% susceptible to voriconazole and fluconazole, and 95% for itraconazole. At 48 hr, 100% of the isolates remained susceptible for flucytosine and amphotericin B, 95% for voriconazole, 93% for fluconazole, 90% for ketoconazole, and 82% for itraconazole. The agreement between the CLSI and the other methods was better at 24 than 48 hr.     

Susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans: a microdilution technique.

We studied a series of test conditions in a microtiter system to define the optimal method for determining the susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans to antifungal agents. Twenty-one isolates of C. neoformans were grown for 24 or 48 h in four chemically defined media: yeast nitrogen base (BYNB 7); RPMI 1640; synthetic amino acid medium--fungal (SAAMF), buffered at pH 7.0 to select the medium that best supported growth of this fastidious yeast; and yeast nitrogen base, pH 5.4 (YNB 5.4). Maximum growth of C. neoformans, at 35 degrees C, was obtained in YNB 5.4, with the next highest growth levels in BYNB 7, SAAMF, and RPMI. Growth at 24 h was uniformly poor in all media and lacked reproducibility. In contrast, incubation for 48 h gave adequate growth with low standard deviations, and 48 h was selected as the optimal incubation period for this study. Comparison of the relationship between growth kinetics and initial inoculum size for eight cryptococcal isolates showed that 10(4) cells per ml yielded optimal growth in BYNB 7 and YNB 5.4, whereas 10(5) cells per ml was optimal in RPMI and SAAMF. Furthermore, variation of inocula from 10(3) to 10(5) cells per ml showed small but significant inoculum effects in determining MICs of fluconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine for C. neoformans. Therefore, 10(4) cells per ml was chosen as the optimal inoculum for susceptibility testing in this study. Mean MICs of fluconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine for 21 crytococcal isolates in RPMI and BYNB 7 were low (for example, fluconazole had mean MICs of 1.2 and 1.3 micrograms/ml in RPMI and BYNB 7, respectively) and differed significantly from medium to medium. In contrast, the MICs obtained in SAAMF were significantly higher (e.g., fluconazole had a mean MIC of 2.2 micrograms/ml). Variance in MICs was large with fluconazole and flucytosine but small with amphotericin B, irrespective of the medium used. A microtiter system employing BYNB 7 as the medium, 48 h as the incubation period, and 10(4) cells per ml as the final inoculum is a simple, accurate, and reproducible method for the testing of C. neoformans susceptibility to fluconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine.     

Comparison of the Etest and the sensititre colorimetric methods with the NCCLS proposed standard for antifungal susceptibility testing of Aspergillus species

The susceptibilities of 25 clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus, A. flavus, A. terreus, A. nidulans, and A. ustus to itraconazole and amphotericin B were determined by an agar diffusion-dilution method (the Etest method) and a colorimetric broth microdilution method (the Sensititre method); and the results were compared with those obtained by the NCCLS proposed standard M-38P method for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Various MIC endpoints for the three methods were determined visually by four different observers in three blinded experiments, and the reproducibilities among the observers (interobserver agreement) and among the replicates (interexperimental agreement) as well as the levels of agreement between the NCCLS, the Etest, and the Sensititre methods were calculated. High levels of reproducibility (within 1 twofold dilution) were found for the NCCLS method (>95%) with the MIC-0 endpoint (complete inhibition of growth) for both drugs and with the MIC-1 endpoint (slight growth) for itraconazole and for the Sensititre method (>90%) with all MIC endpoints, although for the latter the interexperimental agreement for itraconazole was comparatively lower (83 to 93%). The Etest method was less reproducible (67 to 87%) for both drugs. Using the recommended MIC endpoints, high levels of agreement (within one twofold dilution) between the NCCLS and the Sensititre methods for all species were found for amphotericin B (>77%) but not for itraconazole (<66%), for which the MICs by the Sensititre method were up to 3 twofold dilutions lower than the corresponding MICs by the NCCLS method. The use of the first blue well as an endpoint for the Sensititre method and 48 h of incubation improved the levels of agreement with the NCCLS method. Low levels of agreement between the NCCLS and the Etest methods using the recommended MIC endpoints were found for most species, especially after 48 h of incubation (<50%), when the MICs obtained by the Etest method were up to 9 twofold dilutions higher than the corresponding MICs obtained by the NCCLS method. Relatively better agreement was found after 24 h, although it was species dependent, with the highest levels of agreement (>82%) found for A. terreus and A. ustus for amphotericin B and A. fumigatus for both drugs. Overall, better agreement was found when MIC-0 was used as the MIC endpoint for the NCCLS method for both drugs and when the MICs by the Etest method were determined after 48 h of incubation for itraconazole and after 24 h of incubation for amphotericin B.     

Comparative study of broth macrodilution and microdilution techniques for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards' proposed standard.

A comparative study of broth macro- and microdilution methods for susceptibility testing of fluconazole, itraconazole, flucytosine, and amphotericin B was conducted with 273 yeasts. The clinical isolates included 100 Candida albicans, 28 Candida tropicalis, 25 Candida parapsilosis, 15 Candida lusitaniae, 15 Candida krusei, 50 Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans, 25 Torulopsis (Candida) glabrata, and 15 Trichosporon beigelii strains. Both methods were performed according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards' (NCCLS) recommendations (document M27-P). For fluconazole, itraconazole, and flucytosine, the endpoint was the tube that showed 80% growth inhibition compared with the growth control for the macrodilution method and the well with slightly hazy turbidity (score 1) compared with the growth control for the microdilution method. For amphotericin B, the endpoint was the tube and/or well in which there was absence of growth. For the reference macrodilution method, the MICs were determined after 48 h of incubation for Candida spp., T. glabrata, and T. beigelii and after 72 h for C. neoformans var. neoformans. For the microdilution method, either the first-day MICs (24 h for all isolates other than C. neoformans and 48 h for C. neoformans var. neoformans) or the second-day MICs (48 and 72 h, respectively) were evaluated. The agreement within one doubling dilution of the macrodilution reference for all drugs was higher with the second-day MICs than with the first-day MICs for the microdilution test for most of the tested strains. General agreement was 92% for fluconazole, 85.7% for itraconazole, 98.3% for flucytosine, and 96.4% for amphotericin B. For C. neoformans var. neoformans and T. beigelii, the agreement of the first-day reading was higher than that of the second-day reading for fluconazole (94 versus 92%, respectively, for C. neoformans var. neoformans, and 86.7 versus 80%, respectively, for T. beigelii). Our studies indicate that the microdilution technique performed following the NCCLS guidelines with a second-day reading is a valid alternative method for testing fluconazole, itraconazole, flucytosine, and amphotericin B against these eight species of yeasts.