Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non-susceptible patients: a prospective long-term study

Objectives: To evaluate the implant survival rate, periodontal and radiographic parameters of non‐submerged screw implants with two different surfaces (TPS and SLA) in periodontally non‐susceptible patients (NSP) and in patients with chronic adult periodontitis (CAP) or with generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP). Material and methods: In 110 healthy partially edentulous subjects, 68 patients with CAP and 16 patients with GAP, a total of 513 implants were installed and followed for on average 48.1±25.9 months. Only fixed partial dentures were used as suprastructures. All patients were offered a supportive periodontal maintenance program. Smoking habits, health impairment, plaque score, bleeding on probing (BOP), type of surface, bone score, bone loss on radiographs and the number of failed implants were noted. Results: Implant survival in the NSP and CAP group was 98% and 96% after 140 months (NS), but only 80% after 100 months in the GAP group (P=0.0026). The overall rate of implant loss was 4.7%, but 15.25% in the GAP group (6/16 patients). The average marginal bone loss for all implants was 0.12±0.71 mm on the mesial side and 0.11±0.68 mm on the distal side. Bone loss/year was 0.08±0.31 and 0.07±0.3 mm in the NSP group, but 0.17±0.2 and 0.17±0.19 mm in the GAP group. Only in the GAP group, was bone loss significantly related to BOP, age, inflammation, presence of plaque, probing depth. Implants with a TPS surface had a lower survival than implants with an SLA surface (93% vs. 97%; P=0.06), especially in the GAP group (80% vs. 83%; P=0.005). Smoking habits had a significant influence on implant survival only in the GAP group (P=0.07), declining in current smokers to 63%, and to 78% in former smokers. Overall, impaired general health had no significant influence (P=0.85). However, impaired health further reduced implant survival in the GAP group (survival: 71%). In a statistical model to predict the chance for implant failing, only periodontal classification (P=0.012) and implant surface type (P=0.027) were significant. Conclusion: Periodontally healthy patients and patients with CAP show no difference in peri‐implant variables and implant survival rate, but patients with GAP have more peri‐implant pathology, more marginal bone loss and a lower implant survival implant rate. SLA surface had a better prognosis than the TPS surface.     

In-patient comparison of immediate and conventional loaded implants in mandibular molar sites within 12 months

Objectives: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of dental implants placed in the mandibular molar sites and immediately functionally restored compared with conventionally loaded controls in an in‐patient study. Material and methods: Twenty‐four dental implants were placed in 12 patients who had first molar loss bilaterally in the mandibular area. One site of the patient was determined as immediately loaded (IL) and the other side was conventionally loaded (CL). Resonance frequency analyses for implant stability measurements, radiographic examinations for marginal bone levels and peri‐implant evaluations were performed during the clinical follow‐up appointments within 12 months. Results: During the 12‐month follow‐up period, only one implant was lost in the IL group. The mean implant stability quotient values were 74.18±5.72 and 75.18±3.51 for Groups IL and CL at surgery, respectively, and the corresponding values were 75.36±5.88 and 75.64±4.84 at 1‐year recall, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant between the two groups during the 12‐month study period (P>0.05). When peri‐implant parameters were evaluated, excellent peri‐implant health was demonstrated during the 1‐year observation period and all implants showed less than 1 mm of marginal bone resorption during the first year. Conclusions: In the present study, immediate functionally loading did not negatively affect implant stability, marginal bone levels and peri‐implant health when compared with conventional loading of single‐tooth implants.     

Peri-implant health around screw-shaped c.p. titanium machined implants in partially edentulous patients with or without ongoing periodontitis

Abstract: The relationship between periodontitis and peri‐implantitis remains a matter of debate. The present study compared, “within” randomly chosen partially edentulous patients (n=84 subjects, 97 jaws), the marginal bone loss around teeth and implants during 5 years (range 3 to 11 years) following the first year of bone remodelling. The patients had all been rehabilitated by means of screw‐shape c.p. titanium implants with a machined surface (Brånemark system^®). During the 5 years observation interval, periodontal parameters (marginal bone and attachment loss, the latter for teeth only) were collected together with data on confounding factors (smoking, oral hygiene, tooth loss). Marginal bone loss was measured through long‐cone intra‐oral radiographs. The mean “interval” bone loss was significantly (P=0.0001) higher around teeth (0.48±0.95 mm) than around implants (0.09±0.28 mm). The corresponding data for the “worst” performing tooth (0.99±1.25 mm) and implant (0.19±0.32 mm) per subject showed the same tendency. Neither attachment nor bone loss around teeth correlated with marginal bone loss around implants. This study indicated that the rate of bone loss around screw‐shape c.p. titanium implants with a machined surface (Brånemark system^® implants) was not influenced by the progression rate of periodontal destruction around the remaining teeth within the same jaw.     

Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible

Background: It has been shown that peri‐implant crestal bone reactions are influenced by both a rough–smooth implant border in one‐piece, non‐submerged, as well as an interface (microgap [MG] between implant/abutment) in two‐piece butt‐joint, submerged and non‐submerged implants being placed at different levels in relation to the crest of the bone. According to standard surgical procedures, the rough–smooth implant border for implants with a smooth collar should be aligned with the crest of the bone exhibiting a smooth collar adjacent to peri‐implant soft tissues. No data, however, are available for implants exhibiting a sandblasted, large‐grit and acid‐etched (SLA) surface all the way to the top of a non‐submerged implant. Thus, the purpose of this study is to histometrically examine crestal bone changes around machined versus SLA‐surfaced implant collars in a side‐by‐side comparison. Methods: A total of 60 titanium implants (30 machined collars and 30 SLA collars) were randomly placed in edentulous mandibular areas of five foxhounds forming six different subgroups (implant subgroups A to F). The implants in subgroups A to C had a machined collar (control), whereas the implants in subgroups D to F were SLA‐treated all the way to the top (MG level; test). Furthermore, the MGs of the implants were placed at different levels in relation to the crest of the bone: the implants in subgroups A and E were 2 mm above the crest, in subgroups C and D 1 mm above, in subgroup B 3 mm above, and in subgroup F at the bone crest level. For all implants, abutment healing screws were connected the day of surgery. These caps were loosened and immediately retightened monthly. At 6 months, animals were sacrificed and non‐decalcified histology was analyzed by evaluating peri‐implant crestal bone levels. Results: For implants in subgroup A, the estimated mean crestal bone loss (± SD) was ?0.52 ± 0.40 mm; in subgroup B, +0.16 ± 0.40 mm (bone gain); in subgroup C, ?1.28 ± 0.21 mm; in subgroup D, ?0.43 ± 0.43 mm; in subgroup E, ?0.03 ± 0.48 mm; and in subgroup F, ?1.11 ± 0.27 mm. Mean bone loss for subgroup A was significantly greater than for subgroup E (P = 0.034) and bone loss for subgroup C was significantly greater than for subgroup D (P <0.001). Conclusions: Choosing a completely SLA‐surfaced non‐submerged implant can reduce the amount of peri‐implant crestal bone loss and reduce the distance from the MG to the first bone–implant contact around unloaded implants compared to implants with a machined collar. Furthermore, a slightly exposed SLA surface during implant placement does not seem to compromise the overall hard and soft tissue integration and, in some cases, results in coronal bone formation in this canine model.     

Impact of Platform Switching on Peri‐Implant Bone Remodeling around Short Implants in the Posterior Region, 1‐Year Results from a Split‐Mouth Clinical Trial

Aim: To assess the effect of platform switching on peri‐implant bone remodeling around short implants (8.5 mm) placed in the resorbed posterior mandibular and maxillary region of partially edentulous patients. Materials and Methods: Seventeen patients with one or more missing teeth at both sides in the posterior region were, according to a split‐mouth design, randomly assigned to be treated with a platform‐matched (control) implant on the one side and a platform‐switched implant (test) on the other side. A total of 62 short implants (8.5 mm) with a dual‐acid etched surface with nanometer‐sized calcium phosphate particles was placed. Follow‐up visits were conducted one month and one year after placing the implant crown. Outcome measures were interproximal bone level changes, implant survival and clinical parameters. Results: One year after loading, peri‐implant bone remodeling around test implants (0.53 ± 0.54 mm) was significant less than around control implants (0.85 ± 0.65 mm; p = .003). With regard to implant survival and clinical parameters no significant differences were observed between test and control implants. Conclusions: This study suggested that peri‐implant bone remodeling is affected by platform switching. One year after loading, interproximal bone levels were better maintained at implants restored according to the platform switching concept.     

Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted Acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs

Background: A minimal marginal bone loss around implants during early healing has been considered acceptable. However, the preservation of the marginal bone is related to soft tissue stability and esthetics. Implant designs and surfaces were evaluated to determine their impact on the behavior of the crestal bone. The purpose of this study is to evaluate histologic marginal bone level changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted acid‐etched–surfaced implants with a machined collar (MC) or no MC (NMC). Methods: Three months after a tooth extraction, 72 sandblasted acid‐etched chemically modified implants were placed in six dogs. Thirty‐six implants had NMC, and 36 implants had a 2.8‐mm MC. All implants were loaded 21 days after placement. For histologic analyses, specimens were obtained at 3 and 12 months. Assessments of the percentage of the total bone‐to‐implant contact and linear measurements of the distance from the shoulder of the implant to the first bone‐to‐implant contact (fBIC) were performed. Based on fBIC measurements, estimates of bone loss were obtained for each implant. A mixed‐model analysis of variance was used to assess the effects of implant type and sacrifice time. Results: All implants achieved osseointegration. The mean bone gain observed around NMC early loaded implants (at 3 months: 0.13 ± 0.37 mm; at 12 months: 0.13 ± 0.44 mm) was significantly different from the mean bone loss for MC early loaded implants (at 3 months: ?0.32 ± 0.70 mm; at 12 months: ?0.79 ± 0.35 mm) at 3 months (P = 0.003) and 12 months (P <0.001). No infrabony component was present at the marginal fBIC around NMC implants in most cases. There were no statistically significant differences among the means of total bone contact for implant types. Conclusions: Chemically modified, sandblasted acid‐etched–surfaced implants with NMC presented crestal bone gain after 3 and 12 months under loading conditions in the canine mandible. The implant design and surface were determinants in the marginal bone level preservation.     

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Bone Loss around Titanium Implants with Oxidized Surface: Six‐Year Follow‐Up Results from a Prospective Case Series Study

Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess long‐term clinical outcomes and peri‐implant bone level changes around oxidized implants supporting partial fixed rehabilitations. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐two partially edentulous patients were included in the study. A total of 33 fixed rehabilitations were placed, supported by 54 titanium implants with oxidized microtextured surface. Prostheses were delivered after 3 and 6 months of implant placement in the mandible and maxilla, respectively. Patients were scheduled for follow‐up at 6 and 12 months and then yearly. At each follow‐up, plaque level and bleeding scores were assessed and periapical radiographs were taken. The main outcomes were prosthesis success, implant survival, implant success, and marginal bone level change. Results: Three patients were excluded from the study because they did not attend the 1‐year follow‐up. Nineteen patients, accounting for 49 implants, were followed for at least 6 years after prosthesis delivery. The mean follow‐up duration was 81.8 months (range 75–96 months). One mandibular single‐tooth implant failed after 1 year in a smoker woman. Cumulative implant survival and success at 6 years were 98.0% and 95.9%, respectively. Prosthesis success was 96.7%. The mean peri‐implant bone loss at 6 years was 0.76 ± 0.47 mm. Not significantly (p = .75) greater bone loss was found in the maxilla (0.78 ± 0.14 mm, n = 19) as compared with the mandible (0.74 ± 0.59 mm, n = 30). In the maxilla, bone loss was significantly greater around implants supporting partial prostheses as compared with single‐tooth implants (p = .03). Full patient satisfaction was reported. Conclusion: Implants with oxidized microtextured surface may achieve excellent long‐term clinical outcomes in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism.     

Immediately restored one-piece single-tooth implants with reduced diameter: one-year results of a multi-center study

Objectives: The aim of the present multi‐center study was to evaluate the treatment outcome of immediately restored one‐piece single‐tooth implants with a diameter of 3 mm after 1 year. Material and methods: A total of 57 one‐piece implants (NobelDirect^® 3.0) were inserted in 47 patients (26 females, 21 males) with a mean age of 31 years (range: 17–76 years) at five different centers. The implants replaced maxillary lateral incisors and mandibular incisors. The implants were placed either in conjunction with tooth extraction or in healed sites, and all implants were immediately restored with a provisional resin crown. If needed, the abutment part of the implant was prepared before crown cementation. The permanent crown was placed after 1.9–14.5 months. Radiographs were taken at implant insertion as well as after 6 and 12 months to evaluate the peri‐implant marginal bone level and bone loss. Moreover, plaque, bleeding on probing and complications were assessed. Results: A total of 44 patients (23 females, 21 males) with 54 implants were available for the 1‐year follow‐up. One implant was lost, thus the 1‐year implant survival was 98%. A statistically significant mean marginal bone loss was observed between baseline and 6 months (1.1 mm, range: ?0.7 to 4.4 mm; n=49) and between baseline and 12 months (1.6 mm, range: ?0.8 to 4.6 mm; n=50). A total of 18% of the implants were characterized by a bone loss of more than 3 mm. No bleeding on probing was observed around 83% of the implants. Plaque was registered at 15% of the implants. The most common complications were related to the provisional crown, i.e. fracture (n=3) and loss of retention (n=3). Conclusions: A high 1‐year implant survival was observed in the present study. However, the excessive peri‐implant marginal bone loss around several implants indicates that this implant should be used with caution until further studies have been conducted. To cite this article:
Zembi? A, Johannesen LH, Schou S, Malo P, Reichert T, Farella M, Hämmerle CHF. Immediately restored one‐piece single‐tooth implants with reduced diameter: one‐year results of a multi‐center study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012; 49–54.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02174.x     

Factors affecting soft tissue level around anterior maxillary single‐tooth implants

Background: Peri‐implant soft tissue recession is a major esthetic concern for the anterior implants. The aim of this study was to determine the factors that affected the facial marginal mucosal level and papilla level around single‐tooth implants in the anterior maxilla. Methods: Forty single‐tooth implants in the anterior maxilla were studied. Variables possibly associated with the soft tissue level were obtained from clinical measurements, study models, peri‐apical radiographs, and computerized tomograms. Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, and binary logistic regression analysis were used to determine the influence of each factor on the facial marginal mucosal level and papilla level. Results: The majority of the implants (75%) replaced the upper central incisors. The facial mucosal margin of the implant was 0.5±0.9 mm more apical than that of the contralateral tooth. Half or more of papilla fill was observed in 89% of the samples. More apical level of the facial mucosal margin at the implant sites was significantly influenced by many factors including a thin peri‐implant biotype, a proclined implant fixture angle, more apical level of the facial bone crest, increased distance from the contact point to the bone crest, contact point to the platform, and contact point to implant bone. A thin biotype was the most significant factor in determining the facial marginal mucosal level. Increased distance from the contact point to the bone crest was the only factor significantly associated with less papilla fill. Conclusions: The papilla level around single‐tooth implants in the anterior maxilla was mainly influenced by the interproximal bone crest level of the adjacent tooth. Facial marginal mucosal level, on the other hand, was affected by multiple factors including the peri‐implant biotype, the facial bone crest level, the implant fixture angle, the interproximal bone crest level, the depth of implant platform, and the level of first bone to implant contact. To cite this article:
Nisapakultorn K, Suphanantachat S, Silkosessak O, Rattanamongkolgul S. Factors affecting soft tissue level around anterior maxillary single‐tooth implants.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 662–670.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01887.x     

Comparison of Peri‐Implant Soft Tissue Parameters and Crestal Bone Loss Around Immediately Loaded and Delayed Loaded Implants in Smokers and Non‐Smokers: 5‐Year Follow‐Up Results

Background: The aim of this study is to compare peri‐implant soft tissue parameters (plaque index [PI], bleeding on probing [BOP], and probing depth [PD] ≥4 mm) and crestal bone loss (CBL) around immediately loaded (IL) and delayed loaded (DL) implants in smokers and non‐smokers. Methods: Thirty‐one patients with IL implants (16 smokers and 15 non‐smokers) and 30 patients with DL implants (17 smokers and 13 non‐smokers) were included. Personal data regarding age, sex, and duration and daily frequency of smoking were gathered using a questionnaire. Peri‐implant PI, BOP, and PD ≥4 mm were recorded, and mesial and distal CBL was measured on standardized digital radiographs. Multiple group comparisons were performed using the Bonferroni post hoc test (P <0.05). Results: All implants replaced mandibular premolars or molars. Mean scores of PI (P <0.05) and PD ≥4 mm (P <0.05) were statistically significantly higher in smokers compared with non‐smokers in patients with IL and DL dental implants. The mean score of BOP (P <0.05) was statistically significantly higher in non‐smokers compared with smokers in both groups. CBL (P <0.05) was statistically significantly higher in smokers compared with non‐smokers in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in PI, BOP, PD ≥4 mm, and total CBL among smokers with IL and DL implants. Conclusions: Tobacco smoking enhances peri‐implant soft tissue inflammation and CBL around IL and DL implants. Loading protocol did not show a significant effect on peri‐implant hard and soft tissue status in healthy smokers and non‐smokers.     

Retrospective Evaluation of Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non‐Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: The Effect of Bone Grafting at Implant Placement

Background: There is limited information regarding the effect of grafting of the osteotomy after subcrestal implant placement. The primary aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the effect of bone grafting of the defect between the bone crest and the coronal aspect of implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non‐submerged and at subcrestal positions. Methods: Records of 50 consecutive patients treated with subcrestally placed dental implants grafted with a xenograft (Group A) and 50 consecutive patients with subcrestally placed dental implants without any grafting material (Group B) were reviewed. For each implant, the radiographs after placement were compared to images from the last follow‐up visit and evaluated regarding the following: 1) degree of subcrestal positioning of the implant, 2) changes of marginal hard‐tissue height over time, and 3) whether marginal hard‐tissue could be detected on the implant platform at the follow‐up visit. Results: The mean marginal loss of hard tissues was 0.11 ± 0.30 mm for Group A and 0.08 ± 0.22 mm for Group B. Sixty‐nine percent of the implants in Group A and 77% of the implants in Group B demonstrated hard tissue on the implant platform. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding marginal peri‐implant hard‐tissue loss. Conclusion: The present study fails to demonstrate that grafting of the remaining osseous wound defect between the bone crest and the coronal aspect of the implant has a positive effect on marginal peri‐implant hard‐tissue changes.     

Which device is more accurate to determine the stability/mobility of dental implants? A human cadaver study

Summary Non‐invasive devices including resonance frequency (RF) analysis and mobility measuring (MM) damping capacity assessment are used to measure implant stability/mobility. The aims of the study were to compare the primary stability of implant inserted into extraction sockets by using RF with cable, RF wireless and new wireless MM device, to clarify the relation between these devices and to understand the correlations between peri‐implant bone levels and implant stability. A total of 30 screw‐type implants (3·75 × 11 and 4·2 × 11 mm) were inserted into extraction sockets of eight mandibular pre‐molar regions of human cadavers. The primary stability of implants was measured by three devices after insertion. Peri‐implant vertical defects were created in millimetre increments ranging between 0 and 5 mm, and stability/mobility of implants were analysed. At placement, the mean implant stability quotient of RF with cable, RF wireless and MM device values was 46 ± 1, 57·8 ± 9 and ?5·4 ± 1, respectively. Statistical correlations were demonstrated between these devices (P = 0·001). Statistically significant differences were presented for all peri‐implant detects ranging between 0 and 5 mm for RF with cable and RF wireless at all increments. However, only a significant decrease was found between 0 and 1 mm defects, and 4 and 5 mm defects in MM device. Although RF with cable and RF wireless seem to be suitable to detect peri‐implant bone loss around implants in 1 mm increments, the new MM device may not be suitable to detect the 1 mm peri‐implant bone changes in human dried cadaver mandibles.     

Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze whether or not a cantilever extension on a fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) supported by implants increased the amount of peri‐implant bone loss or technical complications compared with reconstructions without cantilevers. Materials and Methods: Fifty‐four partially dentate patients with a total of 54 FDPs supported by 78 implants were enrolled in the study. Twenty‐seven FDPs were with cantilever and 27 FDPs were without cantilever (control group). All FDPs were supported by one or two implants and were located in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The primary outcome variable was change in peri‐implant marginal bone level from the time of FDP placement to the last follow‐up visit. FDPs were under functional loading for a period of 3 up to 12.7 years. Statistical analysis was carried out with Student's t‐test. Regression analyses were carried out to evaluate the influence of confounding factors on the peri‐implant bone level change. In addition, implant survival rates were calculated and technical complications assessed. Results: After a mean observation period of 5.3 years, the mean peri‐implant bone loss for the FDPs with cantilevers was 0.23 mm (SD±0.63 mm) and 0.09 mm (SD±0.43 mm) for FDPs without cantilever. Concerning the bone level change at implants supporting FDPs with or without cantilevers no statistically significant differences were found. The regression analysis revealed that jaw of implant placement had a statistically significant influence on peri‐implant bone loss. When the bone loss in the cantilever group and the control group were compared within the maxilla or mandible separately, no statistically significant difference was found. Implant survival rates reached 95.7% for implants supporting cantilever prostheses and 96.9% for implants of the control group. Five FDPs in the cantilever group showed minor technical complications, none were observed in the control group. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study it was concluded that cantilever on FDPs did not lead to a higher implant failure rate and did not lead to more bone loss around supporting implants compared with implants supporting conventional FDPs. In contrast to these results more technical complications were observed in the group reconstructed with cantilever.     

Marginal Bone Level Changes and Prosthetic Maintenance of Mandibular Overdentures Supported by 2 Implants: A 5‐Year Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Documentation of early loading of mandibular overdentures supported by different implant systems is scarce. Purpose: This study aimed to compare the biologic and prosthetic outcome of mandibular overdentures supported by unsplinted early‐loaded one‐ and two‐stage oral implants after 5 years of function. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐eight consecutive patients were screened following an inclusion and exclusion criteria, and randomly allocated to treatment groups. Ball‐retained mandibular overdentures were fabricated on two unsplinted Straumann® (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) and Brånemark® (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) dental implants and subjected to an early‐loading protocol. During the 5‐year period, prosthetic complications were recorded. At 5‐years of function, plaque, peri‐implant inflammation, bleeding, and calculus index scores were recorded, and standard periapical radiographs were obtained from each implant for measurement of marginal bone loss. Results: All implants survived during the observation period. The peri‐implant inflammation, bleeding, and calculus index scores around Straumann and Brånemark implants were similar (p > .05). The marginal bone loss around Brånemark implants (1.21 ± 0.1) was higher than Straumann implants (0.73 ± 0.06) at 5 years of function (p = .002). Kaplan–Meier tests revealed that 1‐ and 5‐year survival of overdentures on Straumann and Brånemark implants were similar (p = .85). Wear of the ball abutment in the Brånemark group was higher than in the Straumann group (p < .05). Complications regarding the retainer and the need for occlusal adjustments were higher in the Straumann group (p < .05). Chi‐square test revealed that the frequency of retightening of the retainer was higher in the Straumann group than in the Brånemark group (p < .05). Conclusions: Mandibular overdentures supported by unsplinted early‐loaded Straumann and Brånemark implants lead to similar peri‐implant soft tissue and prosthetic outcomes, although higher marginal bone loss could be observed around Brånemark implants after 5 years.     

Treatment Outcome in Patients With Peri‐Implantitis in a Periodontal Clinic: A Retrospective Study

Background: The number of placed implants has grown during the past decade, and the prevalence of peri‐implantitis has increased. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the treatment outcome of peri‐implantitis and to identify factors influencing the treatment success rate. Methods: The study was conducted as a retrospective longitudinal study on a referral population. The material included 382 implants with peri‐implantitis in 150 patients. Peri‐implantitis was defined as presence of pocket depths ≥5 mm, bleeding at probing and/or suppuration, and the presence of implant radiographic bone loss ≥3 mm or bone loss comprising at least three threads of the implant. Variance analyses, χ² analyses, and logistic regression analysis were used for data analyses. Results: The mean age of the participants at baseline was found to be 64 years (range: 22 to 87 years). The mean ± SD follow‐up time was 26 ± 20 months, and the mean time between implant installation and baseline was 6.4 years (range: 1 to 20 years). Periodontal flap surgery with osteoplasty was the most common type of therapy (47%), and regenerative surgery procedures with bone substitute materials were chosen in 20% of the cases. The mean success rate at patient level was 69%. The results of the logistic regression analyses showed that the success rate was significantly lower for individuals with the diagnosis of severe periodontitis, severe marginal bone loss around the implants, poor oral hygiene, and low compliance. Conclusion: The effectiveness of the peri‐implantitis therapy was impaired by severe periodontitis, severe marginal bone loss around the implants, poor oral hygiene, and low compliance.     

Peri-implant bone organization under immediate loading conditions: collagen fiber orientation and mineral density analyses in the minipig model

Background: Mechanical properties of bones are greatly influenced by percentages of organic and mineral constituents. Nevertheless, information about mineralization level on a microscopic scale and collagen fiber organization in peri‐implant bone after immediate loading is scarce. Purpose: The aim of this work was to analyze and compare the degree of mineralization and collagen fiber orientation in alveolar bone (AB) and peri‐implant bone of immediately loaded (IL) and unloaded (NL) implants. Materials and Methods: A total of 25 dental implants of 3.8 mm in diameter and 11 mm in length were used in the present study. In five minipigs, three premolars and the first molar were removed from the left side of the mandible. Three months later, five implants for each animal were inserted. Four implants were loaded immediately with a fixed restoration, while one implant was left unloaded. After a 4‐month healing period, all implants were retrieved. Circularly polarized light and scanning electron microscope with backscattered electron imaging were used to analyze both peri‐implant and AB retrieved 5 mm from the implant. Results: The bone/implant contact ratio (BIC %) was 77.8 ± 5.9% for the IL implants and 78.0 ± 5.8% for the NL implants; the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.554). In the peri‐implant bone, the area related to transverse collagen fibers was 112,453 ± 4,605 pixels for IL implants and 87,256 ± 2,428 pixels for NL implants. In the AB, the area related to transverse collagen fibers was 172,340 ± 3,892 pixels. The difference between groups was statistically significant (p < .001). The degree of mineralization of peri‐implant bone was 137 ± 19 gray level for IL implants and 115 ± 24 gray level for NL implants, while in the AB, the degree of mineralization was 125 ± 26 gray level. This difference was statistically significant (p < .001). Conclusion: In this study, it was found that IL and NL implants showed the same degree of osseointegration. The bone matrix around IL implants had a higher quantity of transverse collagen fibers and presented a higher level of mineralization.     

Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5-year results

Purpose: The aim of this study was to test whether or not implants associated with bone regeneration show the same survival and success rates as implants placed in native bone in patients requiring both forms of therapy. Material and methods: Thirty‐four patients (median age of 60.3 years, range 18–77.7 years) had been treated 5 years before the follow‐up examination. Machined screw‐type implants were inserted following one of two surgical procedures: (1) simultaneously with a guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure, which involved grafting with xenogenic bone substitute material, autogenous bone or a mixture of the two and defect covering with a bio‐absorbable collagen membrane (test) and (2) standard implantation procedure without bone regeneration (control). For data recording, one test and one control implant from each patient were assessed. Examination included measurements of plaque control record (PCR), probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), width of keratinized mucosa (KM), frequency of situations with supra‐mucosal location of the crown margin, implant survival assessment and radiographic examination. Radiographs were digitized to assess the marginal bone level (MBL). Differences between groups were tested using the one‐sample t‐test. The estimation of survival rate was based on Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: The follow‐up period of the 34 GBR and 34 control implants ranged from 49 to 70 months (median time 57 months). Cumulative survival rates reached 100% for the GBR group and 94.1% for the control group without statistical significance. No statistically significant differences for clinical and radiographic parameters were found between the two groups regarding PCR, BOP, PPD, KM and MBL. Conclusion: The present study showed that, clinically, implants placed with concomitant bone regeneration did not performed differently from implants placed into native bone with respect to implant survival, marginal bone height and peri‐implant soft tissue parameters.     

Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15-month evaluation

Objectives: Chemical modification of the already proven sand‐blasted and acid‐etched (SLA) implant had increased its surface wettability and consequent early‐term osseointegration characteristics. The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the stability changes, success, survival, peri‐implant parameters and marginal bone loss (MBL) of the early‐loaded standard (SLA) and modified sand‐blasted, acid‐etched (modSLA) implants. Material and methods: A total of 96 SLA and modSLA implants were placed in a bi‐lateral, cross‐arch position to the jaws of 22 patients. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was used to measure the implant stability in the surgery and following healing after 1, 3 and 6 weeks. At the stage of loading, a panoramic X‐ray was obtained and RFA measurement was repeated for all implants. Implants were restored by metal–ceramic crowns and followed for 1 year to determine the success, survival rate, peri‐implant parameters and MBL. Results were compared by one‐ and two‐way ANOVA, log‐rank test and generalized linear mixed models (P<0.05). Results: One modSLA implant was lost after 3 weeks following the surgery yielding to a 100 and 97.91% success rate for SLA and modSLA implants, respectively (P=0.323). At the loading stage, modSLA implants showed significantly lower MBL (0.18 ± 0.05 mm) than SLA implants (0.22 ± 0.06 mm; P=0.002). In the loading stage, RFA value of the modSLA implants (60.42 ± 6.82) was significantly higher than the both implant types in the surgical stage (55.46 ± 8.29 and 56.68 ± 8.19), and following 1 (56.08 ± 7.01 and 55.60 ± 9.07) and 3 weeks of healing (55.94 ± 5.95 and 55.40 ± 6.50 for SLA and modSLA implants, respectively). Conclusions: modSLA implants demonstrated a better stability and a reduced MBL at the loading stage. Both SLA and modSLA implants demonstrated a favorable success and survival at the end of 15‐month follow‐up. To cite this article :
Karabuda ZC, Abdel‐Haq J. Arιsan V. Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand‐blasted, acid‐etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15‐month evaluation.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 840–849
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02065.x     

Combination of ultrasonic decontamination,soft tissue curettage,and submucosal air polishing with povidone‐iodine application for non‐surgical therapy of peri‐implantitis: 12‐month clinical outcomes

1 Background

The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of a concept for non‐surgical peri‐implantitis combining stepwise mechanical debridement measures with adjuvant povidone‐iodine application with and without systemic antibiotics.

2 Methods

Forty‐five patients with chronic periodontitis and a total of 164 screw‐typed implants with peri‐implantitis were included. Peri‐implantitis was defined as radiographic bone loss of > 2 mm, probing depth (PD) ≥5 mm with bleeding on probing (BOP). Stepwise treatment of implants was performed with ultrasonic debridement, soft tissue curettage (STC), glycine powder air polishing (GPAP), and a repeated submucosal application of povidone‐iodine. Teeth with PD > 4 mm were treated simultaneously according to the same concept except STC. In cases with severe periodontitis (n = 24), amoxicillin and metronidazole (AM) were prescribed for 7 days.

3 Results

After 12 months, implants treated without AM showed significant reductions (P < 0.05) of mean PD (1.4 ± 0.7 mm), clinical attachment level (CAL) (1.3 ± 0.8 mm), and BOP (33.4% ± 17.2%). In deep pockets (PD > 6 mm) changes of mean PD (2.3 ± 1.3 mm), CAL (2.0 ± 1.6 mm), and BOP (44.0% ± 41.7%) were more pronounced. Intake of AM did not significantly influence the changes in these parameters. However, the reduction of implant sites with PD > 4 mm and BOP was significantly higher in patients with AM than in those without AM (31.8% ± 12.6% versus 20.8% ± 14.7%; P < 0.05).

4 Conclusions

The combination of ultrasonic debridement, STC, and GPAP with adjuvant povidone‐iodine led to significant clinical improvements at implants. Systemic antibiotics had limited effects on the reduction of persisting implant sites with treatment need.     

Comparison of peri‐implant clinical and radiographic status around short (6 mm in length) dental implants placed in cigarette‐smokers and never‐smokers: Six‐year follow‐up results

Background

It is hypothesized that peri‐implant clinical and radiographic inflammatory parameters (probing depth [PD], bleeding on probing [BOP] and plaque index [PI]; and radiographic (crestal bone loss [CBL]) are worse among cigarette‐smokers (CS) compared with never‐smokers (NS) with short implants.

Purpose

The present 6‐year follow‐up retrospective study compared the peri‐implant clinical and radiographic parameters in CS and NS with short dental implants (6 mm in length).

Materials and methods

Fifty‐six male individuals were included. These individuals divided into 2 groups as follows: (a) Group‐1: 29 self‐reported systemically healthy CS with 48 short‐implants; and (b) Group‐2: 27 self‐reported systemically healthy NS with 43 short implants. Peri‐implant PD, PI, BOP, and CBL were measured. Group comparisons were done using the Kruskal‐Wallis test and sample size was estimated. Level of significance was set at P values < .05.

Results

In groups 1 and 2, the follow‐up durations were 6.2 ± 0.1 years and 6.1 ± 0.3 years, respectively. A cigarette smoking history of 8.9 ± 3.6 pack years was reported by individuals in Group‐1. At follow‐up, scores of peri‐implant PD, BOP, PI, and mesial and distal CBL were comparable around short implants in both groups.

Conclusion

Under strict oral hygiene maintenance protocols, short dental implants can remain functionally stable in CS in a manner similar to NS.