Numb-deficient satellite cells have regeneration and proliferation defects

The adaptor protein Numb has been implicated in the switch between cell proliferation and differentiation made by satellite cells during muscle repair. Using two genetic approaches to ablate Numb, we determined that, in its absence, muscle regeneration in response to injury was impaired. Single myofiber cultures demonstrated a lack of satellite cell proliferation in the absence of Numb, and the proliferation defect was confirmed in satellite cell cultures. Quantitative RT-PCR from Numb-deficient satellite cells demonstrated highly up-regulated expression of p21 and Myostatin, both inhibitors of myoblast proliferation. Transfection with Myostatin-specific siRNA rescued the proliferation defect of Numb-deficient satellite cells. Furthermore, overexpression of Numb in satellite cells inhibited Myostatin expression. These data indicate a unique function for Numb during the initial activation and proliferation of satellite cells in response to muscle injury.Satellite cells represent a muscle-specific stem cell population that allows for muscle growth postnatally and is necessary for muscle repair (1). In response to muscle-fiber damage, quiescent satellite cells that lie along the myofibers under the plasmalemma are activated and proliferate. Proliferating satellite cells have a binary fate decision to make—they can differentiate into myoblasts and intercalate into myofibers by fusion to repair the damaged muscle or they can renew the satellite cell population and return to a quiescent state (2–4). Quiescent satellite cells express paired box 7 (Pax7), but low or undetectable levels of the myogenic regulatory factors Myf5 and MyoD (5, 6). Activated satellite cells robustly express Pax7 and MyoD/Myf5, but a subset will subsequently down-regulate the myogenic regulatory factors in the process of satellite cell self-renewal (7). Recent studies have demonstrated that, in vivo, Pax7-positive cells are necessary for muscle repair (8, 9).Notch signaling is an important regulator of satellite cell function; it is implicated in satellite cell activation, proliferation (2, 10, 11), and maintenance of quiescence (12, 13). Expression of constitutively active Notch1 results in maintenance of Pax7 expression and down-regulation of Myod/Myf5 whereas inhibition of Notch signaling leads to myogenic differentiation (10, 14). In fact, conditional ablation of Rbpj embryonically results in hypotrophic muscle (15), and, if ablated in the adult, satellite cells undergo spontaneous activation and precocious differentiation with a failure of self-renewal (12, 13). In adult muscle, the Notch ligand, Delta-like1 (Dll1), is expressed on satellite cells, myofibers, and newly differentiating myoblasts and is necessary for repair (10, 11, 16). In aged muscle, impairment of regeneration is due, in part, to a failure of Dll1 expression (17).Numb en`s four proteins with molecular masses of 65, 66, 71, and 72 kDa by alternative splicing of two exons (18, 19). The Numb proteins are cytoplasmic adaptors that direct ubiquitination and degradation of Notch1 by recruiting the E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch to the receptor (18–22). Numb is a cell-fate determinant that mediates asymmetric cell division, leading to selective Notch inhibition in one daughter cell and its subsequent differentiation whereas the other daughter has active Notch signaling and remains proliferative (10). Embryonically, Numb is expressed in the myotome whereas Notch1 is limited to the dermomyotome (23, 24). This pattern suggests that the expression of Numb in one daughter cell allows entry into the myogenic lineage. Indeed, overexpression of Numb embryonically increases the number of myogenic progenitors in the somite (25, 26).Numb expression increases during the activation and proliferative expansion of satellite cells, becoming asymmetrically segregated in transit-amplifying cells and leading to asymmetric cell divisions (10, 27). These observations led to a model in which Numb inhibits Notch signaling in one daughter satellite cell, allowing it to undergo myogenic differentiation. The molecular switch that controls the decision of satellite cell progeny to continue proliferating or to differentiate is not well understood. This process seems to be controlled by a decrease of Notch signaling due to increased expression of Numb and an increase in Wnt signaling (10–14, 17, 28). In these studies, we examined the role of Numb in satellite cell function by genetic deletion of Numb from myogenic progenitors and satellite cells. Our observations reveal that Numb is necessary for satellite cell-mediated repair. Furthermore, Numb-deficient satellite cells have an unexpected proliferation defect due to an up-regulation of Myostatin. These data indicate a unique role for Numb in regulating the activation and proliferation of satellite cells.     

Exchange protein directly activated by cAMP plays a critical role in bacterial invasion during fatal rickettsioses

Rickettsiae are responsible for some of the most devastating human infections. A high infectivity and severe illness after inhalation make some rickettsiae bioterrorism threats. We report that deletion of the exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) gene, Epac1, in mice protects them from an ordinarily lethal dose of rickettsiae. Inhibition of Epac1 suppresses bacterial adhesion and invasion. Most importantly, pharmacological inhibition of Epac1 in vivo using an Epac-specific small-molecule inhibitor, ESI-09, completely recapitulates the Epac1 knockout phenotype. ESI-09 treatment dramatically decreases the morbidity and mortality associated with fatal spotted fever rickettsiosis. Our results demonstrate that Epac1-mediated signaling represents a mechanism for host–pathogen interactions and that Epac1 is a potential target for the prevention and treatment of fatal rickettsioses.Rickettsiae are responsible for some of the most devastating human infections (1–4). It has been forecasted that temperature increases attributable to global climate change will lead to more widespread distribution of rickettsioses (5). These tick-borne diseases are caused by obligately intracellular bacteria of the genus Rickettsia, including Rickettsia rickettsii, the causative agent of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) in the United States and Latin America (2, 3), and Rickettsia conorii, the causative agent of Mediterranean spotted fever endemic to southern Europe, North Africa, and India (6). A high infectivity and severe illness after inhalation make some rickettsiae (including Rickettsia prowazekii, R. rickettsii, Rickettsia typhi, and R. conorii) bioterrorism threats (7). Although the majority of rickettsial infections can be controlled by appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy if diagnosed early, up to 20% of misdiagnosed or untreated (1, 3) and 5% of treated RMSF cases (8) result in a fatal outcome caused by acute disseminated vascular endothelial infection and damage (9). Fatality rates as high as 32% have been reported in hospitalized patients diagnosed with Mediterranean spotted fever (10). In addition, strains of R. prowazekii resistant to tetracycline and chloramphenicol have been developed in laboratories (11). Disseminated endothelial infection and endothelial barrier disruption with increased microvascular permeability are the central features of SFG rickettsioses (1, 2, 9). The molecular mechanisms involved in rickettsial infection remain incompletely elucidated (9, 12). A comprehensive understanding of rickettsial pathogenesis and the development of novel mechanism-based treatment are urgently needed.Living organisms use intricate signaling networks for sensing and responding to changes in the external environment. cAMP, a ubiquitous second messenger, is an important molecular switch that translates environmental signals into regulatory effects in cells (13). As such, a number of microbial pathogens have evolved a set of diverse virulence-enhancing strategies that exploit the cAMP-signaling pathways of their hosts (14). The intracellular functions of cAMP are predominantly mediated by the classic cAMP receptor, protein kinase A (PKA), and the more recently discovered exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) (15). Thus, far, two isoforms, Epac1 and Epac2, have been identified in humans (16, 17). Epac proteins function by responding to increased intracellular cAMP levels and activating the Ras superfamily small GTPases Ras-proximate 1 and 2 (Rap1 and Rap2). Accumulating evidence demonstrates that the cAMP/Epac1 signaling axis plays key regulatory roles in controlling various cellular functions in endothelial cells in vitro, including cell adhesion (18–21), exocytosis (22), tissue plasminogen activator expression (23), suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS-3) induction (24–27), microtubule dynamics (28, 29), cell–cell junctions, and permeability and barrier functions (30–37). Considering the critical importance of endothelial cells in rickettsioses, we examined the functional roles of Epac1 in rickettsial pathogenesis in vivo, taking advantage of the recently generated Epac1 knockout mouse (38) and Epac-specific inhibitors (39, 40) generated from our laboratory. Our studies demonstrate that Epac1 plays a key role in rickettsial infection and represents a therapeutic target for fatal rickettsioses.     

Structure-based cleavage mechanism of Thermus thermophilus Argonaute DNA guide strand-mediated DNA target cleavage

We report on crystal structures of ternary Thermus thermophilus Argonaute (TtAgo) complexes with 5′-phosphorylated guide DNA and a series of DNA targets. These ternary complex structures of cleavage-incompatible, cleavage-compatible, and postcleavage states solved at improved resolution up to 2.2 Å have provided molecular insights into the orchestrated positioning of catalytic residues, a pair of Mg²⁺ cations, and the putative water nucleophile positioned for in-line attack on the cleavable phosphate for TtAgo-mediated target cleavage by a RNase H-type mechanism. In addition, these ternary complex structures have provided insights into protein and DNA conformational changes that facilitate transition between cleavage-incompatible and cleavage-compatible states, including the role of a Glu finger in generating a cleavage-competent catalytic Asp-Glu-Asp-Asp tetrad. Following cleavage, the seed segment forms a stable duplex with the complementary segment of the target strand.Argonaute (Ago) proteins, critical components of the RNA-induced silencing complex, play a key role in guide strand-mediated target RNA recognition, cleavage, and product release (reviewed in refs. 1–3). Ago proteins adopt a bilobal scaffold composed of an amino terminal PAZ-containing lobe (N and PAZ domains), a carboxyl-terminal PIWI-containing lobe (Mid and PIWI domains), and connecting linkers L1 and L2. Ago proteins bind guide strands whose 5′-phosphorylated and 3′-hydroxyl ends are anchored within Mid and PAZ pockets, respectively (4–7), with the anchored guide strand then serving as a template for pairing with the target strand (8, 9). The cleavage activity of Ago resides in the RNase H fold adopted by the PIWI domain (10, 11), whereby the enzyme’s Asp-Asp-Asp/His catalytic triad (12–15) initially processes loaded double-stranded siRNAs by cleaving the passenger strand and subsequently processes guide-target RNA duplexes by cleaving the target strand (reviewed in refs. 16–18). Such Mg²⁺ cation-mediated endonucleolytic cleavage of the target RNA strand (19, 20) resulting in 3′-OH and 5′-phosphate ends (21) requires Watson–Crick pairing of the guide and target strands spanning the seed segment (positions 2–2′ to 8–8′) and the cleavage site (10′–11′ step on the target strand) (9). Insights into target RNA recognition and cleavage have emerged from structural (9), chemical (22), and biophysical (23) experiments.Notably, bacterial and archaeal Ago proteins have recently been shown to preferentially bind 5′-phosphoryated guide DNA (14, 15) and use an activated water molecule as the nucleophile (reviewed in ref. 24) to cleave both RNA and DNA target strands (9). Structural studies have been undertaken on bacterial and archaeal Ago proteins in the free state (10, 15) and bound to a 5′-phosphorylated guide DNA strand (4) and added target RNA strand (8, 9). The structural studies of Thermus thermophilus Ago (TtAgo) ternary complexes have provided insights into the nucleation, propagation, and cleavage steps of target RNA silencing in a bacterial system (9). These studies have highlighted the conformational transitions on proceeding from Ago in the free state to the binary complex (4) to the ternary complexes (8, 9) and have emphasized the requirement for a precisely aligned Asp-Asp-Asp triad and a pair of Mg²⁺ cations for cleavage chemistry (9), typical of RNase H fold-mediated enzymes (24, 25). Structural studies have also been extended to binary complexes of both human (5, 6) and yeast (7) Agos bound to 5′-phosphorylated guide RNA strands.Despite these singular advances in the structural biology of RNA silencing, further progress was hampered by the modest resolution (2.8- to 3.0-Å resolution) of TtAgo ternary complexes with guide DNA (4) and added target RNAs (8, 9). This precluded identification of water molecules coordinated with the pair of Mg²⁺ cations, including the key water that acts as a nucleophile and targets the cleavable phosphate between positions 10′-11′ on the target strand. We have now extended our research to TtAgo ternary complexes with guide DNA and target DNA strands, which has permitted us to grow crystals of ternary complexes that diffract to higher (2.2–2.3 Å) resolution in the cleavage-incompatible, cleavage-compatible, and postcleavage steps. These high-resolution structures of TtAgo ternary complexes provide snapshots of distinct key steps in the catalytic cleavage pathway, opening opportunities for experimental probing into DNA target cleavage as a defense mechanism against plasmids and possibly other mobile elements (26, 27).     

Drosophila seminal protein ovulin mediates ovulation through female octopamine neuronal signaling

Across animal taxa, seminal proteins are important regulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. However, little is understood about the physiological or molecular mechanisms by which seminal proteins effect these changes. To investigate this topic, we studied the increase in Drosophila melanogaster ovulation behavior induced by mating. Ovulation requires octopamine (OA) signaling from the central nervous system to coordinate an egg’s release from the ovary and its passage into the oviduct. The seminal protein ovulin increases ovulation rates after mating. We tested whether ovulin acts through OA to increase ovulation behavior. Increasing OA neuronal excitability compensated for a lack of ovulin received during mating. Moreover, we identified a mating-dependent relaxation of oviduct musculature, for which ovulin is a necessary and sufficient male contribution. We report further that oviduct muscle relaxation can be induced by activating OA neurons, requires normal metabolic production of OA, and reflects ovulin’s increasing of OA neuronal signaling. Finally, we showed that as a result of ovulin exposure, there is subsequent growth of OA synaptic sites at the oviduct, demonstrating that seminal proteins can contribute to synaptic plasticity. Together, these results demonstrate that ovulin increases ovulation through OA neuronal signaling and, by extension, that seminal proteins can alter reproductive physiology by modulating known female pathways regulating reproduction.Throughout internally fertilizing animals, seminal proteins play important roles in regulating female fertility by altering female physiology and, in some cases, behavior after mating (reviewed in refs. 1–3). Despite this, little is understood about the physiological mechanisms by which seminal proteins induce postmating changes and how their actions are linked with known networks regulating female reproductive physiology.In Drosophila melanogaster, the suite of seminal proteins has been identified, as have many seminal protein-dependent postmating responses, including changes in egg production and laying, remating behavior, locomotion, feeding, and in ovulation rate (reviewed in refs. 2 and 3). For example, the Drosophila seminal protein ovulin elevates ovulation rate to maximal levels during the 24 h following mating (4, 5), and the seminal protein sex peptide (SP) suppresses female mating receptivity and increases egg-laying behavior for several days after mating (6–10). However, although a receptor for SP has been identified (11), along with elements of the neural circuit in which it is required (12–14), SP’s mechanism of action has not yet been linked to regulatory networks known to control postmating behaviors. Thus, a crucial question remains: how do male-derived seminal proteins interact with regulatory networks in females to trigger postmating responses?We addressed this question by examining the stimulation of Drosophila ovulation by the seminal protein ovulin. In insects, ovulation, defined here as the release of an egg from the ovary to the uterus, is among the best understood reproductive processes in terms of its physiology and neurogenetics (15–27). In D. melanogaster, ovulation requires input from neurons in the abdominal ganglia that release the catecholaminergic neuromodulators octopamine (OA) and tyramine (17, 18, 28). Drosophila ovulation also requires an OA receptor, OA receptor in mushroom bodies (OAMB) (19, 20). Moreover, it has been proposed that OA may integrate extrinsic factors to regulate ovulation rates (17). Noradrenaline, the vertebrate structural and functional equivalent to OA (29, 30), is important for mammalian ovulation, and its dysregulation has been associated with ovulation disorders (31–38). In this paper we investigate the role of neurons that release OA and tyramine in ovulin’s action. For simplicity, we refer to these neurons as “OA neurons” to reflect the well-established role of OA in ovulation behavior (16–20, 22).We investigated how action of the seminal protein ovulin relates to the conserved canonical neuromodulatory pathway that regulates ovulation physiology (39–41). We found that ovulin increases ovulation and egg laying through OA neuronal signaling. We also found that ovulin relaxes oviduct muscle tonus, a postmating process that is also mediated by OA neuronal signaling. Finally, subsequent to these effects we detected an ovulin-dependent increase in synaptic sites between OA motor neurons and oviduct muscle, suggesting that ovulin’s stimulation of OA neurons could have increased their synaptic activity. These results suggest that ovulin affects ovulation by manipulating the gain of a neuromodulatory pathway regulating ovulation physiology.     

Reconstitution of long and short patch mismatch repair reactions using Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins

A problem in understanding eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair (MMR) mechanisms is linking insights into MMR mechanisms from genetics and cell-biology studies with those from biochemical studies of MMR proteins and reconstituted MMR reactions. This type of analysis has proven difficult because reconstitution approaches have been most successful for human MMR whereas analysis of MMR in vivo has been most advanced in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we describe the reconstitution of MMR reactions using purified S. cerevisiae proteins and mispair-containing DNA substrates. A mixture of MutS homolog 2 (Msh2)–MutS homolog 6, Exonuclease 1, replication protein A, replication factor C-Δ1N, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and DNA polymerase δ was found to repair substrates containing TG, CC, +1 (+T), +2 (+GC), and +4 (+ACGA) mispairs and either a 5′ or 3′ strand interruption with different efficiencies. The Msh2–MutS homolog 3 mispair recognition protein could substitute for the Msh2–Msh6 mispair recognition protein and showed a different specificity of repair of the different mispairs whereas addition of MutL homolog 1–postmeiotic segregation 1 had no affect on MMR. Repair was catalytic, with as many as 11 substrates repaired per molecule of Exo1. Repair of the substrates containing either a 5′ or 3′ strand interruption occurred by mispair binding-dependent 5′ excision and subsequent resynthesis with excision tracts of up to ∼2.9 kb occurring during the repair of the substrate with a 3′ strand interruption. The availability of this reconstituted MMR reaction now makes possible detailed biochemical studies of the wealth of mutations identified that affect S. cerevisiae MMR.DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a critical DNA repair pathway that is coupled to DNA replication in eukaryotes where it corrects misincorporation errors made during DNA replication (1–9). This pathway prevents mutations and acts to prevent the development of cancer (10, 11). MMR also contributes to gene conversion by repairing mispaired bases that occur during the formation of recombination intermediates (3, 4, 12). Finally, MMR acts to suppress recombination between divergent but homologous DNA sequences, thereby preventing the formation of genome rearrangements that can result from nonallelic homologous recombination (4, 13–15).Our knowledge of the mechanism of eukaryotic MMR comes from several general lines of investigation (3–9). Studies of bacterial MMR have provided a basic mechanistic framework for comparative studies (5). Genetic and cell-biology studies, primarily in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, have identified eukaryotic MMR genes, provided models for how their gene products define MMR pathways, and elucidated some of the details of how MMR pathways interact with replication (1–4). Reconstitution studies, primarily in human systems, have identified some of the catalytic features of eukaryotic MMR (7–9, 16, 17). Biochemical and structural studies of S. cerevisiae and human MMR proteins have provided information about the function of individual MMR proteins (6–9).In eukaryotic MMR, mispairs are bound by MutS homolog 2 (Msh2)–MutS homolog 6 (Msh6) and Msh2–MutS homolog 3 (Msh3), two partially redundant complexes of MutS-related proteins (3, 4, 18, 19). These complexes recruit a MutL-related complex, called MutL homoloh 1 (Mlh1)–postmeiotic segregation 1 (Pms1) in S. cerevisiae and Mlh1–postmeiotic segregation 2 (Pms2) in human and mouse (3, 4, 20–23). The Mlh1–Pms1/Pms2 complex has an endonuclease activity suggested to play a role in the initiation of the excision step of MMR (24, 25). Downstream of mismatch recognition is a mispair excision step that can be catalyzed by Exonuclease 1 (Exo1) (26–28); however, defects in both S. cerevisiae and mouse Exo1 result in only a partial MMR deficiency, suggesting the existence of additional excision mechanisms (26, 27, 29). DNA polymerase δ, the single-strand DNA binding protein replication protein A (RPA), the sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and the clamp loader replication factor C (RFC) are also required for MMR at different steps, including activation of Mlh1–Pms1/Pms2, stimulation of Exo1, potentially in Exo1-independent mispair excision, and in the gap-filling resynthesis steps of MMR (3, 16, 17, 24, 27, 30–36). Although much is known about these core MMR proteins, it is not well understood how eukaryotic MMR is coupled to DNA replication (1, 2), how excision is targeted to the newly replicated strand (1, 25, 37–39), or how different MMR mechanisms such as Exo1-dependent and -independent subpathways are selected or how many such subpathways exist (1, 24, 27, 29).S. cerevisiae has provided a number of tools for studying MMR, including forward genetic screens for mutations affecting MMR, including dominant and separation-of-function mutations, the ability to evaluate structure-based mutations in vivo, cell biological tools for visualizing and analyzing MMR proteins in vivo, and overproduction of individual MMR proteins for biochemical analysis. However, linking these tools with biochemical systems that catalyze MMR reactions in vitro for mechanistic studies has not yet been possible. Here, we describe the development of MMR reactions reconstituted using purified proteins for the analysis of MMR mechanisms.     

The structural kinetics of switch-1 and the neck linker explain the functions of kinesin-1 and Eg5

Kinesins perform mechanical work to power a variety of cellular functions, from mitosis to organelle transport. Distinct functions shape distinct enzymologies, and this is illustrated by comparing kinesin-1, a highly processive transport motor that can work alone, to Eg5, a minimally processive mitotic motor that works in large ensembles. Although crystallographic models for both motors reveal similar structures for the domains involved in mechanochemical transduction—including switch-1 and the neck linker—how movement of these two domains is coordinated through the ATPase cycle remains unknown. We have addressed this issue by using a novel combination of transient kinetics and time-resolved fluorescence, which we refer to as “structural kinetics,” to map the timing of structural changes in the switch-1 loop and neck linker. We find that differences between the structural kinetics of Eg5 and kinesin-1 yield insights into how these two motors adapt their enzymologies for their distinct functions.There are more than 42 kinesin genes in the human genome, representing 14 distinct classes (1). All are members of the P-loop NTPase superfamily of nucleotide triphosphate hydrolases (2–4). Like other NTPases, kinesins share a conserved Walker motif nucleotide-binding fold (2, 4) that consists of a central twisted β-sheet and three nucleotide-binding loops, which are termed switch-1, switch-2, and the P-loop. Kinesins also share a common microtubule (MT) binding interface, which isomerizes between states that either bind MTs weakly or strongly, and a mechanical element, termed the neck linker (NL). The NL has been proposed to isomerize between two conformations: one that is flexible and termed undocked, and the other that is ordered and termed docked, where it interacts with a cleft in the motor domain formed by the twisted β-sheet and is oriented along the MT axis (5–7). NL isomerization (5, 8) is hypothesized to be the force-generating transition in kinesin motors (6, 7, 9–11), and its position has also been proposed to coordinate the ATPase cycles of processive kinesin dimers by regulating nucleotide binding and hydrolysis (11).Spectroscopic and structural studies have led to a model to explain how kinesins generate force (5–7, 9, 10, 12–15) (summarized in SI Appendix, Fig. S1), which proposes that the conformations of the nucleotide binding site, the MT-binding interface, and the NL are all determined by the state of the catalytic site. It predicts that when unbound to the MT, the motor contains ADP in its catalytic site and its NL is undocked. MT binding accelerates ADP dissociation, thereby allowing ATP to bind, the NL to dock, and mechanical work to be performed. ATP hydrolysis and phosphate release are then followed by dissociation from the MT to complete the cycle (5, 7–10, 14). This model also argues that: (i) NL docking of the MT-attached motor domain moves the tethered, trailing head into a forward position, where it undergoes a biased diffusional search to attach to the next MT-binding site (11, 14); (ii) switch-1, which coordinates the γ-phosphate of ATP, alternates between two conformations, referred to as “open” and “closed,” and the NL alternates between docked and undocked (5, 6, 10, 13–15); and (iii) coordination between the conformations of switch-1 and the NL regulates the timing of the ATPase cycles of the two motor domains in processive kinesin dimers (11). However, the model fails to explain several features of kinesins. For example, it predicts that ATP does not bind to kinesin when the NL is docked. This prediction is inconsistent with studies of both Eg5 and kinesin-1, which suggest ATP binds more readily when the NL is docked (11, 16, 17). The model also predicts that the NL should be docked after ATP binding. However, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) probes attached to the NL show a significant population of both mobile and immobile NL states in the presence of both pre- and posthydrolytic ATP analogs (5). Furthermore, the model cannot explain the load dependence of stall, detachment, and back stepping, all of which require a branched pathway (11).To resolve these uncertainties, we have measured the kinetics of the structural changes that occur in switch-1 and the NL with nucleotide binding while the motor is bound to the MT in an experimental design that we refer to as “structural kinetics.” We carried out these experiments using an novel spectroscopic approach, termed transient time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer, (TR)²FRET, that allows us to monitor the kinetics and thermodynamics of both the undocked/docked transition in the NL and the open/closed transition in switch-1 that accompany the process of nucleotide binding. These experiments explain differences in the enzymologies of kinesin-1 and Eg5 and suggest an interesting role for the L5 loop in controlling the timing of conformational changes in the Eg5 switch-1 and NL.