Outcomes of surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement for aortic insufficiency

BackgroundResults and durability of aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis are well known, but no study has focused on the results of aortic valve replacement in aortic insufficiency.AimThe aim of this retrospective study was to describe our mid-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement for aortic insufficiency.MethodsAll consecutive adult patients who underwent bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement for aortic insufficiency at two European centres (in France and Germany) between May 2005 and December 2020 were analysed.ResultsDuring the study period, 289 patients were included. Mean age was 56.9 ± 12.5 years. Overall operative mortality was 1.5%, and the 10-year survival estimate rate was 75.0%, which was significantly lower than in the age- and sex-matched general population, with a standardized mortality ratio of 2.88 (95% confidence interval 1.96–4.08; P < 0001). Freedom from aortic valve-related death was 87.6%, and from aortic valve-related reoperation was 87.4%. No patient aged > 60 years was reoperated on during follow-up. Freedom from severe structural valve deterioration at 10 years was 73.3%, and freedom from moderate structural valve deterioration at 10 years was 50.3%. Freedom from major adverse valve-related events at 10 years was 69.7%.ConclusionsAlthough bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement for aortic insufficiency shows good early results, 10-year mortality and major adverse valve-related event rates in young patients may be a concern, with a reduction in life expectancy compared with the general population.     

The difficult balance between thrombosis and bleeding after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A translational review

The difficult balance between thrombosis and bleeding after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. TAVR: transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

     

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the SAPIEN 3 valve to treat aortic regurgitation: The French multicentre S3AR study

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve implantation now has a major role in the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, evidence is scarce on its feasibility and safety to treat patients with pure aortic regurgitation.AimsWe sought to evaluate the results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) in patients with pure aortic regurgitation on native non-calcified valves.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective and prospective French multicentre observational study. We included all patients with symptomatic severe pure aortic regurgitation on native non-calcified valves, contraindicated to or at high risk for surgical valve replacement, who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve.ResultsA total of 37 patients (male sex, 73%) with a median age of 81 years (interquartile range 69–85 years) were screened using transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography and were included at eight French centres. At baseline, 83.8% of patients (n = 31) had dyspnoea New York Heart Association class ≥ III. The device success rate was 94.6% (n = 35). At 30 days, the all-cause mortality rate was 8.1% (n = 3) and valve migration occurred in 10.8% of cases (n = 4). Dyspnoea New York Heart Association class ≤ II was seen in 86.5% of patients (n = 32), and all survivors had aortic regurgitation grade ≤ 1. At 1-year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 16.2% (n = 6), 89.7% (n = 26/29) of survivors were in New York Heart Association class ≤ II and all had aortic regurgitation grade ≤ 2.ConclusionTranscatheter aortic valve implantation using the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve seems promising to treat selected high-risk patients with pure aortic regurgitation on non-calcified native valves, contraindicated to surgical aortic valve replacement.     

Durability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A translational review

Central illustration. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: deterioration biomarkers, pathophysiology and data durability. BVT: bioprosthetic valve thrombosis; ¹⁸FDG: ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose; HOMA index: homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; Lp(a): lipoprotein(a); MDCT: multidetector computed tomography; PCSK9: proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9; PET-CT: positron emission tomography; computed tomography; SVD: structural valve deterioration; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation; TTE: transthoracic echocardiography; y: years.

     

Mitral valve repair is better than mitral valve replacement in native mitral valve endocarditis: Results from a prospective matched cohort

Central Illustration. Main result of the study, including feasibility of mitral valve repair in 76% of cases, and better survival in the mitral valve replacement group.

     

Effectiveness of high implantation of SAPIEN 3 in preventing pacemaker implantation: A propensity score analysis

BackgroundIn transcatheter aortic valve implantation, high implantation on the aortic annulus may prevent conduction pathway injury, leading to a decrease in the rate of permanent pacemaker implantation.AimTo assess the impact of high implantation of SAPIEN 3 on the prevention of permanent pacemaker implantation.MethodsSince August 2020, we have performed high implantation by fluoroscopically positioning the lower part of the lucent line at the virtual basal ring line on a coplanar view before valve implantation. Patients treated before the adoption of this method were defined as the conventional group. We compared the high implantation group with the conventional group using propensity score analysis.ResultsOverall, the high implantation group (n = 95) showed a significantly shorter ventricular strut length than the conventional group (n = 85): median 1.3 (interquartile range 0.2–2.4) mm vs 2.8 (1.8–4.1) mm (P < 0.001). The permanent pacemaker implantation rate was significantly lower in the high implantation group than in the conventional group (2.1% vs 11.8%; P = 0.009). According to 100 propensity score analyses based on multiple imputation and the selection of appropriate covariates, the median P value for the comparison of permanent pacemaker implantation rates after transcatheter aortic valve implantation between the high implantation group and the conventional group ranged between 0.001 and 0.017, indicating a more significant reduction in the permanent pacemaker implantation rate in the high implantation group than in the conventional group. Neither valve dislodgement nor the need for a second valve was observed in either group.ConclusionsThe high implantation of SAPIEN 3 successfully decreases ventricular strut length, reducing the permanent pacemaker implantation rate after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.