Variability in Diagnosed Asthma in Young Children in a Large Pediatric Primary Care Network

ObjectiveOur objectives were to 1) quantify the frequency of wheezing episodes and asthma diagnosis in young children in a large pediatric primary care network and 2) assess the variability in practice-level asthma diagnosis, accounting for common asthma risk factors and comorbidities. We hypothesized that significant variability in practice-level asthma diagnosis rates would remain after adjusting for associated predictors.MethodsWe generated a retrospective longitudinal birth cohort of children who visited 1 of 31 pediatric primary care practices within the first 6 months of life from 1/2005 to 12/2016. Children were observed for up to 8 years or until the end of the observation window. We used multivariable discrete time survival models to evaluate predictors of asthma diagnosis by 3-month age intervals. We compared unadjusted and adjusted proportions of children diagnosed with asthma by practice.ResultsOf the 161,502 children in the cohort, 34,578 children (21%) received at least 1 asthma diagnosis. In multivariable modeling, male gender, minority race/ethnicity, gestational age <34 weeks, allergic rhinitis, food allergy, and prior wheezing episodes were associated with asthma diagnosis. After adjusting for variation in these predictors across practices, the cumulative incidence of asthma diagnosis by practice by age 6 years ranged from 11% to 47% (interquartile range: 24%–29%).ConclusionsAcross pediatric primary care practices, adjusted incidence of asthma diagnosis by age 6 years ranged widely, though variation gauged by the interquartile range was more modest. Potential sources of practice-level variation, such as differing diagnosis thresholds and labeling of different wheezing phenotypes as “asthma,” should be further investigated.     

Continuity of Care in Primary Care for Young Children With Chronic Conditions

Objectives1) To assess continuity of care (CoC) within primary-care practices for children with asthma and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared to children without chronic conditions, and 2) to determine patient and clinical-care factors associated with CoC.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of electronic health records from office visits of children <9 years, seen ≥4 times between 2015 and 2019 in 10 practices of a community-based primary health care network in California. Three cohorts were constructed: 1) Asthma: ≥2 visits with asthma visit diagnoses; 2) ASD: same method; 3) Controls: no chronic conditions. CoC, using Usual Provider of Care measure (range > 0–1), was calculated for 1) all visits (overall) and 2) well-care visits. Fractional regression models examined CoC adjusting for patient age, medical insurance, practice affiliation, and number of visits.ResultsOf 30,678 children, 1875 (6.1%) were classified with Asthma, 294 (1.0%) with ASD, and 15,465 (50.4%) as Controls. Overall CoC was lower for Asthma (Mean = 0.58, SD 0.21) and ASD (M = 0.57, SD = 0.20) than Controls (M = 0.66, SD = 0.21); differences in well-care CoC were minimal. In regression models, lower overall CoC was found for Asthma (aOR = 0.90, 95% CI, 0.85–0.94). Lower overall and well-care CoC were associated with public insurance (aOR = 0.77, CI, 0.74–0.81; aOR = 0.64, CI, 0.59–0.69).ConclusionAfter accounting for patient and clinical-care factors, children with asthma, but not with ASD, in this primary-care network had significantly lower CoC compared to children without chronic conditions. Public insurance was the most prominent patient factor associated with low CoC, emphasizing the need to address disparities in CoC.     

Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Large Primary Care Network

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on screening for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and screening equity among eligible children presenting for well-child care in a large primary care pediatric network, we compared rates of ASD screening completion and positivity during the pandemic to the year prior, stratified by sociodemographic factors.MethodsPatients who presented for in-person well-child care at 16 to 26 months between March 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021 (COVID-19 cohort, n = 24,549) were compared to those who presented between March 1, 2019 and February 29, 2020 (pre-COVID-19 cohort, n = 26,779). Demographics and rates of completion and positivity of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers with Follow-up (M-CHAT/F) were calculated from the electronic health record and compared by cohort using logistic regression models.ResultsTotal eligible visits decreased by 8.3% between cohorts, with a greater decline in Black and publicly insured children. In the pre-COVID-19 cohort, 89.0% of eligible children were screened at least once, compared to 86.4% during the pandemic (P < 0.001). Significant declines in screening completion were observed across all sociodemographic groups except among Asian children, with the sharpest declines among non-Hispanic White children. Sociodemographic differences were not observed in screen-positive rates by cohort.ConclusionsWell-child visits and ASD screenings declined across groups, but with different patterns by race and ethnicity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings regarding screen-completion rates should not be interpreted as a decline in screening disparities, given differences in who presented for care. Strategies for catch-up screening for all children should be considered.     

Improving Adolescent Depression Screening in Pediatric Primary Care

ObjectiveDepression among adolescents is a leading public health problem. Although screening for adolescent depression in primary care is strongly recommended, screening rates remain low. Effective quality improvement (QI) initiatives can facilitate change. This study aims to assess the impact of a QI learning collaborative on adolescent depression screening and initial plans of care in primary care.MethodsSeventeen pediatric-serving practices in Vermont participated in a QI learning collaborative aimed at improving practitioner knowledge and office systems around adolescent depression screening. Monthly medical record reviews provided monitoring of adolescent depression screening and initial plans of care over 7 months for QI. Randomly sampled annual medical record review data allowed comparison of screening and initial plans of care after the QI learning collaborative between participating and 21 control practices.ResultsAs practices improved their office systems around adolescent depression screening and initial plans of care, data showed marked improvement in depression screening at all 17 practices, from 34% to 97% over 7 months. Adolescents at participating practices had 3.5 times greater odds (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14–10.98, P = .03) of being screened for depression and 37.5 times greater odds (95% CI, 7.67–183.48, P < .0005) of being screened with a validated tool than adolescents at control practices, accounting for patient characteristics.ConclusionsThere were significant within practice increases in adolescent depression screening after a QI learning collaborative, as well as in comparison with control practices 1 year later.     

Performance of the Person Centered Primary Care Measure in Pediatric Continuity Clinic

ObjectiveImprovement efforts in pediatric primary care would benefit from measures that capture families’ holistic experience of the practice. We sought to assess the reliability and validity of the new Person-Centered Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) in a pediatric resident continuity clinic serving low-income families.MethodsWe incorporated the 11-item PCPCM, stems adapted to reflect a parent responding about their child's visit, into a telephone survey of 194 parents presenting for care in October 2019 at a pediatric resident continuity clinic in Cleveland Ohio (64% response rate). We evaluated PCPCM items using factor analysis and Rasch modeling, and assessed associations of the PCPCM with parents’ demographics and perceptions of specific elements of their child's care.ResultsIn this sample of low-income families, the PCPCM had good reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.85). All items loaded onto a single factor in principal axes factor analysis. Of the 11 aspects of primary care represented in the scale, “shared experience” was most difficult for parents to endorse in Rasch modeling. All 11 items contributed significantly to the total scale score with corrected item-total correlations >0.4. The PCPCM score was independent of socio demographics and was associated with parent's report that their child's clinician spends enough time with them.ConclusionsThe PCPCM performs well in a pediatric continuity clinic setting, warranting consideration for its use as a parsimonious parent-reported measure of what patients and clinicians say matters most in pediatric primary care.     

Primary Care Accessibility Effects on Health Care Utilization Among Urban Children

ObjectiveEvidence suggests that spatial accessibility to primary care is a contributing factor to appropriate health care utilization, with limited primary care access resulting in avoidable hospitalizations and emergency department visits which are burdensome on individuals and our health care system. Limited research, however, has examined the effects on children.MethodsWe evaluated associations of spatial accessibility to primary care on health care utilization among a sample of 16,709 children aged 0 to 3 years in Philadelphia who were primarily non-White and publicly insured. Log-Poisson models with generalized estimating equations were used to estimate incidence rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), while accounting for 3 levels of clustering (within individual, within primary care practice, within neighborhood).ResultsIn age-adjusted models, the lowest level of spatial accessibility was associated with 7% fewer primary care visits (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91, 0.95), 15% more emergency department visits (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09, 1.22), and 18% more avoidable hospitalizations (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01, 1.37). After adjustment for individual- (race/ethnicity, sex, number of chronic conditions, insurance status) and neighborhood-level (racial composition and proportion of housing units with no vehicle), spatial accessibility was not significantly associated with rate of health care utilization.ConclusionsIndividual-level predisposing factors, such as age, race, and need, attenuate the association between accessibility to primary care and use of primary care, emergency department visits, and avoidable hospitalization. Given the possibility of modifying access to primary care unlike immutable individual factors, a focus on spatial accessibility to primary care may promote appropriate health care utilization.     

Improving Postpartum Depression Screening and Referral in Pediatric Primary Care

IntroductionPostpartum depression (PPD) affects up to 20% of American mothers and, if left untreated, can have serious, lifelong effects on women and their children. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that pediatric practices screen for PPD at the 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-month well-child checks; however, few pediatric practices oblige.MethodsThis project standardized the PPD screening schedule and developed a novel referral algorithm that was concurrently implemented in a rural primary care pediatric practice.ResultsThe project significantly increased the clinic's screening rate from 33% to 80% (p < .001) and improved referral rates from 66% to 79%.DiscussionBy standardizing PPD screening and implementing a referral algorithm in the ambulatory pediatric setting, more PPD cases can be identified, further evaluated, and, hopefully, treated to improve maternal and infant health outcomes.     

Integrating Mental Health Services in Primary Care Continuity Clinics: A National CORNET Study

ObjectiveTo determine whether pediatric continuity clinics integrate mental health (MH) services into care delivery; and to determine whether the level of MH integration is related to access to MH services, types of MH screening performed, self-efficacy, satisfaction with referral sites, and communication with the primary care provider.MethodsPediatric Residency Integrated Survey of Mental Health in Primary Care (PRISM_PC) is a newly designed cross-sectional, Web-based survey of continuity clinic directors participating in a national network of pediatric continuity clinics (CORNET). Definitions of MH models included integrated or nonintegrated MH models or traditional care. The survey included questions regarding access, screening that was performed at sites, comfort with MH management as well as provider satisfaction and communication with referral sites.ResultsSeventy-eight percent (57 of 73) of CORNET site directors responded, representing input from 30% of US pediatric residency continuity programs. Thirty-five percent (n = 20) reported an integrated MH model while 65% (n = 37) reported a nonintegrated MH model. Seventy-nine percent screened for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, 44% for behavioral-emotional issues, and 19% for pediatric depression. No differences were found in terms of screening or tools used on the basis of the level of MH integration. Those with integrated programs were more likely to have access to an on-site psychologist (P = .001) or psychiatrist (P = .006).ConclusionsDirectors from one-third of training programs surveyed reported some level of MH integration in their primary care teaching clinics. Future studies are needed to compare patient and resident education outcomes between integrated and nonintegrated sites.     

Walk-in Model for Ill Care in an Urban Academic Pediatric Clinic

Objectives

Since the Institute of Medicine's 2001 charge to reform health care, there has been a focus on the role of the medical home. Access to care in the proper setting and at the proper time is central to health care reform. We aimed to increase the volume of patients receiving care for acute illnesses within the medical home rather than the emergency department or urgent care center from 41% to 60%.

Improving the Frequency and Documentation of Gun Safety Counseling in a Resident Primary Care Clinic

ObjectiveIncrease the frequency and documentation of gun safety discussions during well-child checks in the pediatric primary care resident clinic to 50% within 6 months.MethodsThis is a quality improvement study in a pediatric resident continuity clinic. Before implementing any interventions, a survey was conducted to understand residents’ attitudes and practices regarding gun safety screening and counseling. Interventions included a parent safety survey, Be SMART materials in clinic, and a prompt embedded into Electronic Health Record templates. Chart reviews were conducted to determine frequency of gun safety discussion. Resident self-reported comfort with gun safety counseling was also evaluated.ResultsA statistical process control chart was generated to track documentation and found the baseline mean rate of gun safety discussions during well-child checks was 3%. Rates increased following the addition of the Electronic Health Record prompt, with the mean further increased to 84% in July 2019. A sustained rate of over 75% was achieved through February 2020. Over 4 study months, the proportion of trainees reporting feeling very uncomfortable/uncomfortable with gun safety counseling decreased from 22% to 15%. The Be SMART program was identified as a key intervention increasing gun safety counseling.ConclusionsOur study identified an effective approach to improving the frequency and documentation of gun safety discussions in an academic primary care setting, providing a unique blueprint for firearm screening and safe storage counseling success. Ultimately, we believe this will increase safe storage behaviors in the home and reduce risks of child death from firearms.     

Improving Emergency Preparedness in Pediatric Primary Care Offices: A Simulation-Based Interventional Study

ObjectivesPediatric emergencies pose a challenge to primary care practices due to irregular frequency and complexity. Simulation-based assessment can improve skills and comfort in emergencies. Our aim was improving pediatric office emergency preparedness, as measured by adherence to the existing American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement, and quality of emergency care in a simulated setting, as measured by performance checklists.MethodsThis was a single center study nested in a multicenter, prospective study measuring emergency preparedness and quality of care in 16 pediatric primary care practices and consisted of 3 phases: baseline assessment, intervention, and follow-up assessment. Baseline emergency preparedness was measured by checklist based on AAP guidelines, and quality of care was assessed using in-situ simulation. A report-out was provided along with resources addressing potential areas for improvement after baseline assessment. A repeat preparedness and simulation assessment was performed after a 6 to 10 month intervention period to measure improvement from baseline.ResultsSixteen offices were recruited with 13 completing baseline and follow-up preparedness assessment. Eight of these sites also completed baseline and follow-up simulation assessment. Median baseline preparedness score was 70% and follow-up was 75.9%. Median baseline simulation performance scores were 37.4% and 35.5% for respiratory distress and seizure scenarios, respectively. Follow-up simulation assessment scores were 73% and 76.9% respectively (P = .001).ConclusionsOur collaborative was able to successfully improve the quality of care in a simulated setting in a group of pediatric primary care offices over 6 to 10 months. Future work will focus on expansion and improving emergency preparedness.     

Perspectives of Caregivers Experiencing Persistent Food Insecurity at an Academic Primary Care Clinic

ObjectiveFood insecurity (FI) is often transitory and instigated by changes in family circumstances or environmental events. Clinics have developed interventions to address FI, yet families may face persistent FI. Little is known about persistently food insecure families’ experiences with clinic-based interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of caregivers experiencing persistent FI in a clinical setting.MethodsWe conducted 40 semistructured interviews at one academic primary care clinic between July 2019 and December 2019. The clinic routinely screened families for FI at every visit; families screening positive could meet with a care navigator and receive bags of nonperishable foods. Caregivers who received food bags at ≥3 visits, spoke English or Spanish, and were ≥18 years old were eligible to participate. Interviews were recorded, de-identified, transcribed, and systematically coded using inductive content analysis. A modified constant comparative method was used to iteratively review codes, identify emerging themes, and resolve differences through consensus.ResultsForty caregivers were interviewed; all were women; 45% were Hispanic/Latinx and 37.5% African American/Black. Three major themes emerged: 1) unmet social and medical needs and the challenges of caregiving complicate FI; 2) social supports help address FI and other social challenges that present barriers to accessing resources; and 3) caregivers provide practical recommendations for addressing persistent FI.ConclusionFamilies experiencing persistent FI described important social supports that help address FI and other social challenges that present barriers to accessing resources. Clinic-based resources were welcomed interventions, but their impact may be limited; practical recommendations were made.     

Vaccinations in Primary Care

Vaccination is amongst the best strategies to improve child survival and reduce morbidity. Vaccines represent the most cost effective and simple intervention to protect against distressing epidemics. There are mortality and morbidity related benefits derived from preventing infectious diseases through vaccination; these include financial benefits by avoiding hospitalization, preventing long-term disability and increased productivity. Ever since the invention of the first vaccine against smallpox by Edward Jenner in 1796, vaccination has become indispensable healthcare intervention and has saved millions of lives. Due to significant scientific progress, many vaccines are available and numerous are anticipated; however, vaccine preventable infectious diseases are still prevalent. Due to rapid pace of developments in the field of vaccination, providers must continue to update their knowledge. The present review is aimed at helping general practitioners understand routine vaccinations, their considerations, issues and side effects.