Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry, Spine Tango

Spine Tango is the first and only International Spine Registry in operation to date. So far, only surgical spinal interventions have been recorded and no comparable structured and comprehensive documentation instrument for conservative treatments of spinal disorders is available. This study reports on the development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders by using the Delphi consensus method. It was conducted with a group of international experts in the field. We also assessed the usability of this new assessment tool with a prospective feasibility study on 97 outpatients and inpatients with low back or neck pain undergoing conservative treatment. The new ‘Spine Tango conservative’ questionnaire proved useful and suitable for the documentation of pathologies, conservative treatments and outcomes of patients with low back or neck problems. A follow-up questionnaire seemed less important in the predominantly outpatient setting. In the feasibility study, between 43 and 63% of patients reached the minimal clinically important difference in pain relief and Core Outcome Measures Index at 3 months after therapy; 87% of patients with back pain and 85% with neck pain were satisfied with the received treatment. With ‘Spine Tango conservative’ a first step has been taken to develop and implement a complementary system for documentation and evaluation of non-surgical spinal interventions and outcomes within the framework of the International Spine Registry. It proved useful and feasible in a first pilot study, but it will take the experience of many more cases and therapists to develop a version similarly mature as the surgical instruments of Spine Tango.     

Both positive and negative beliefs are important in patients with spine pain: findings from the Occupational and Industrial Orthopaedic Center registry

Background Context

Negative beliefs are known to influence treatment outcome in patients with spine pain (SP). The impact of positive beliefs is less clear.

Italian version of the Roland Disability Questionnaire,specific for low back pain: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Over the last 10 years, patient-oriented evaluations using questionnaires have become an important aspect of clinical spinal outcome studies. Any questionnaire must be translated and culturally adapted in order to be used with different language groups, and the translated version must then be evaluated for reliability and validity, which are fundamental attributes of any measurement tool. The Roland Disability Questionnaire, a low back pain disease-specific tool, was submitted to translation into Italian and to cross-cultural adaptation following the Guillemin criteria. It was then validated on 70 patients (37 male and 33 female; mean age 58, range: 28-67) suffering from low back pain as assessed by clinical examination, imaging and also electromyography in cases of suspected neurological impairment. The test-retest reliability, assessed with intraclass correlation, was 0.92 and the internal consistency reached a Cronbach's alpha of 0.82. The Italian version of the Roland Disability Questionnaire satisfied the validation criteria, showing characteristics of reliability and validity similar to previously published versions translated and adapted for other countries.     

Yoga and disc degenerative disease in cervical and lumbar spine: an MR imaging-based case control study

The objective of the current study was to find out whether yoga practice was beneficial to the spine by comparing degenerative disc disease in the spines of long-time yoga practitioners and non-yoga practicing controls, using an objective measurement tool, magnetic resonance imaging. This matched case–control study comprised 18 yoga instructors with teaching experience of more than 10 years and 18 non-yoga practicing asymptomatic individuals randomly selected from a health checkup database. A validated grading scale was used to grade the condition of cervical and lumbar discs seen in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine, and the resulting data analyzed statistically. The mean number of years of yoga practice for the yoga group was 12.9 ± 7.5. The overall (cervical + lumbar) disc scores of the yoga group were significantly lower (indicating less degenerative disc disease) than those of the control group (P < 0.001). The scores for the cervical vertebral discs of the yoga group were also significantly lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001), while the lower scores for the yoga group in the lumbar group approached, but did not reach, statistical significance (P = 0.055). The scores for individual discs of yoga practitioners showed significantly less degenerative disease at three disc levels, C3/C4, L2/L3 and L3/L4 (P < 0.05). Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the group of long-term practitioners of yoga studied had significantly less degenerative disc disease than a matched control group.     

Short-term outcome in lumbar spine surgery

Summary A prospective survey of the outcome of lumbar surgery was carried out under conditions where all intervention was according to routine procedures. Of a consecutive series of patients 132 cases (92%) could be evaluated. The aim was to investigate possible predictive factors among self-reported data and clinical data readily available under routine circumstances. Follow-up was for six months post-operatively. Surgical findings were: herniated disc (62%), ostechondrosis (21%), other pathology (7%), and negative findings (10%). Unsatisfactory outcome was either relapse, operation before follow-up (9%) or persisting pain (30%). The surgical finding of a disc herniation predicted a significantly better outcome than any other finding. Cases previously operated upon (20%) fared equal with those operated upon for the first time irrespective of surgical findings.Self-reported weighting of preoperative pain and its location showed that predominant sciatica was significantly associated with the finding of a disc herniation, but also with satisfactory outcome irrespective of the operative finding. Factors without predictive value included sex, age, number of prior back surgeries, duration and impact of symptoms, and clinical findings. The social consequences were associated with the duration of low back disease.     

化学性神经根炎

目的研究分析疼痛椎间盘的纤维环破裂与患者下肢放射痛的关系,进而探讨是否存在化学性神经根炎这一临床病理现象.方法临床收集42例单节段椎间盘源性下腰痛伴单侧或双侧下肢放射痛患者,男27例,女15例;年龄19～52岁,平均34.9岁;症状持续至少6个月,平均3年4个月.通过椎间盘造影和其后的CT扫描,分析纤维环撕裂方向与下肢放射痛侧别的关系;行肌电图和运动神经传导速度检查,分析有无神经根损伤,以及其与下肢放射痛的关系.结果腰椎间盘造影时,所有患者显示单水平纤维环破裂且呈现一致性疼痛复制反应,纤维环撕裂方向与下肢放射痛的侧别有显著的正相关性.42例肌电图检查提示神经根损害者32例（76%）.23例单侧下肢放射痛者中17例（74%）存在神经根损害,均为同侧;19例双侧下肢放射痛者中有15例（79%）存在神经根损害.症状侧腓总神经和胫神经运动传导速度较正常侧减慢,差异有统计学意义.结论疼痛椎间盘产生的炎性化学物质通过纤维环全层撕裂漏出并作用于相邻神经根引起神经根损害,可能是化学性神经根炎产生的基本病理生理学机制.     

The effects of lumbosacral orthoses on spine stability: What changes in EMG can be expected?

Antagonistic trunk muscle activity is normally required to stabilize the spine. A lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) might reduce the need for this antagonistic activity by providing passive stiffness to the trunk and increasing spine stability. The maximum reduction in trunk muscle EMG and in the resultant spine compression force due to the LSO was estimated using a biomechanical model. The lumbar spine stability was first quantified for the average trunk muscle EMG recorded from 11 male subjects performing various isometric trunk exertion tasks. Subsequently, the spine-stiffening effects of the LSO were implemented in the model and trunk muscle forces were reduced iteratively until the original level of spine stability without the LSO was achieved. The upper bound estimates of the reduction in trunk muscle EMG due to LSO ranged from 0.6% to 14.1% of the maximum voluntary activation depending on the task and the muscle. The resultant spine compression force averaged across all tasks decreased by only 355 N. A much larger variance of the experimental data precluded the detection of these effects at statistically significant levels. However, the small effects size does not necessarily exclude the possibility of functional benefits of slightly reducing muscle activity in patients with low back pain.     

Pulmonary complications after spine surgery

Spine surgery is one of the fastest growing branches of orthopedic surgery. Patients often present with a relatively high acuity and, depending on surgical approach, morbidity and mortality can be comparatively high. Among the most prevalent and most frequently fatality-bound perioperative complications are those affecting the pulmonary system; evidence of clinical or subclinical lung injury triggered by spine surgical procedures is emerging. Increasing burden of comorbidity among the patient population further increases the likelihood of adverse outcome. This review is intended to give an overview over some of the most important causes of pulmonary complications after spine surgery, their pathophysiology and possible ways to reduce harm associated with those conditions. We discuss factors surrounding surgical trauma, timing of surgery, bone marrow and debris embolization, transfusion associated lung injury, and ventilator associated lung injury.     

Movement coordination of the lumbar spine and hip during a picking up activity in low back pain subjects

The effect of low back pain, with or without nerve root signs, on the joint coordination and kinematics of the lumbar spine and hips during everyday activities, such as picking up an object from the floor, are largely unknown. An experimental study was designed to compare lumbar spine and hip joint kinematics and coordination in subjects with and without sub-acute low back pain, while picking up an object in a sitting position. A three-dimensional real-time electromagnetic tracking device was used to measure movements of the lumbar spine and hips. Sixty participants with subacute low back pain, with or without straight leg raise signs, and twenty healthy asymptomatic participants were recruited. The ranges of motions of lumbar spine and hips were determined. Movement coordination between the two regions was examined by cross-correlation. Results showed that mobility was significantly reduced in subjects with back pain, who compensated for limited motion through various strategies. The contribution of the lumbar spine relative to that of the hip was, however, found to be similar in all groups. The lumbar spine–hip joint coordination was substantially altered in subjects with back pain, in particular, those with a positive straight leg raise sign. We conclude that changes in the lumbar and hip kinematics were related to back pain and limitation in straight leg raise. Lumbar–hip coordination was mainly affected by the presence of positive straight leg raise sign when picking up an object in a sitting position.     

Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: determining clinical impact and potential harm from overuse

Background

Lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging is frequently said to be “overused” in the evaluation of low back pain, yet data concerning the extent of overuse and the potential harmful effects are lacking.

后路椎间盘切除椎体融合治疗椎间盘源性下腰痛

目的：观察后路腰椎间盘切除椎体融合治疗椎间盘源性下腰痛的近期疗效。方法：将经临床检查和推间盘造影确诊为椎间盘内紊乱的２７例患者分为两者,一组行椎板开窗间盘切除椎体间Ｃａｇｅ内植骨术（Ｃａｇｅ组）,另一组行椎板开窗间盘切除椎体间植骨经椎弓根内固定术（ＰＳＦ组）,术后随访２～３年,观察患者腰痛改善和腰椎融合情况。结果：腰痛改善率：术后第１年Ｃａｇｅ组为８９％,ＰＳＦ组为９１％,术后第２年Ｃａｇｅ组为９３％,ＰＳＦ组为９４％,腰椎融合率：术后第１年Ｃａｇｅ组为９２％、ＰＳＦ组为９３％,随访期内两组各有１例未融合。结论：后路椎间盘切除椎体间Ｃａｇｅ内植骨或椎间盘切除椎体间植骨经椎弓根内固定治疗椎间盘源性下腰前,近期疗效满意。     

针刺疗法在骨科的应用进展

<正>骨科相关疾病的治疗方式多样,其中针刺以中医理论作为指导,具有适应范围广、疗效显著、使用方便等优势。自古至今,被广泛应用于临床治疗骨科疾病,形成了独特的治疗体系。1在脊柱疾病的应用1. 1颈椎病颈椎病的常见典型症状为颈部疼痛、上肢麻木或伴有放射样疼痛,严重者可出现踩棉花感、行走不稳等症状。王明明~([1])开展的一项"项七针"治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的临床疗效观察     

Neck and back pain specific outcome assessment questionnaires in the Spanish language: a systematic literature review

Background contextAccurate measurement of functional improvement in clinical practice is becoming increasingly recognized as essential in demonstrating whether patients are deriving meaningful benefit from care. Several simple questionnaires have been developed for this purpose. The majority of these have been developed in English. In North America, there is a growing need for clinical tools, including outcome assessment tools that are available in the Spanish language.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding spine-specific outcome assessment questionnaires that are available in Spanish and to examine the evidence on their clinical utility.Study designSystematic review.MethodsThe Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and MANTIS databases were searched for any studies on the topic of outcome assessment questionnaires in the Spanish language. Relevant articles were reviewed, and the data on reliability, validity, time to completion, and any other properties of the questionnaire was extracted.ResultsThe search strategy identified 287 articles, of which 10 were deemed relevant. With regard to neck pain, data were found regarding Spanish translations of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Core Outcome Measure for neck pain. With regard to low back pain, data were found regarding Spanish translations of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ), and the North American Spine Society—American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons questionnaire.ConclusionsSeveral reliable and valid outcome assessment questionnaires are available in the Spanish language. All were originally developed in English. It appears from the data reviewed that the most useful instruments are the NDI for neck pain patients and the ODI and RMQ for low back pain patients. The current trend is for the development of culturally adapted versions of these questionnaires that are specific to a particular country or region.     

The effect of walking faster on people with acute low back pain

Little is known about self-selected speed and fast walking in people with acute low back pain. This study aimed to investigate (1) the strategies that people with acute low back pain use to change from self-selected speed to fast walking and (2) the effect of a period of treadmill walking on level of back pain. Eight participants with acute low back pain and eight matched control participants were evaluated during self-selected speed and fast walking on a treadmill. The eight participants with back pain were retested 6 weeks later when pain had resolved. Measurements were taken of (1) three-dimensional angular movements of the pelvis and lumbar spine using a videoanalysis system, (2) the timing and distance parameters of walking, and (3) pain levels as measured by a visual analogue scale. We found that to walk faster, those with acute low back pain increased stride length and the frontal plane movements of pelvic list and lumbar lateral flexion (pelvis) to a greater extent than when symptoms had resolved. We also found that 10 min of treadmill walking at self-selected speed led to a reduction in the level of back pain and that there was a high degree of negative correlation between level of back pain and stride length. An additional 5 min of fast walking did not lead to any further changes in level of back pain. These findings support clinical recommendations that the moderate physical activity of walking may be beneficial in the management of people with acute low back pain. To walk faster, people with acute low back pain may utilise strategies that had been limited at self-selected speed, without any increase in pain.     

Outcomes differ between subgroups of patients with low back and leg pain following neural manual therapy: a prospective cohort study

The objective is to determine if pain and disability outcomes of patients treated with neural mobilisation differ for sub-classifications of low back and leg pain (LB&LP). Radiating leg pain is a poor prognostic factor for recovery in patients with LBP. To improve outcome, a new pathomechanism-based classification system was proposed: neuropathic sensitization (NS), denervation (D), peripheral nerve sensitization (PNS) and musculoskeletal (M). Seventy-seven patients with unilateral LB&LP were recruited. Following classification, all subjects were treated seven times with neural mobilisation techniques. A successful outcome was defined as achieving a minimal clinically important change in pain intensity (11-point numerical rating scale), physical function (Roland Morris disability questionnaire) and global perceived change (7-point Likert scale: from 1 = “completely recovered” to 7 = “worse than ever”). The proportion of responders was significantly greater in PNS (55.6%) than the other three groups (NS 10%; D 14.3% and M10%). After adjusting for baseline differences, mean magnitude of improvement of the outcome measures were significantly greater in PNS compared to the other groups. Patients classified as PNS have a more favourable prognosis following neural mobilisation compared to the other groups.     

A hypothesis of chronic back pain: ligament subfailure injuries lead to muscle control dysfunction

Clinical reports and research studies have documented the behavior of chronic low back and neck pain patients. A few hypotheses have attempted to explain these varied clinical and research findings. A new hypothesis, based upon the concept that subfailure injuries of ligaments (spinal ligaments, disc annulus and facet capsules) may cause chronic back pain due to muscle control dysfunction, is presented. The hypothesis has the following sequential steps. Single trauma or cumulative microtrauma causes subfailure injuries of the ligaments and embedded mechanoreceptors. The injured mechanoreceptors generate corrupted transducer signals, which lead to corrupted muscle response pattern produced by the neuromuscular control unit. Muscle coordination and individual muscle force characteristics, i.e. onset, magnitude, and shut-off, are disrupted. This results in abnormal stresses and strains in the ligaments, mechanoreceptors and muscles, and excessive loading of the facet joints. Due to inherently poor healing of spinal ligaments, accelerated degeneration of disc and facet joints may occur. The abnormal conditions may persist, and, over time, may lead to chronic back pain via inflammation of neural tissues. The hypothesis explains many of the clinical observations and research findings about the back pain patients. The hypothesis may help in a better understanding of chronic low back and neck pain patients, and in improved clinical management.     

Ten-year survey reveals differences in GP management of neck and back pain

Purpose

Clinical guidelines provide similar recommendations for the management of new neck pain and low back pain (LBP) but it is unclear if general practitioner’s (GP) care is similar. While GP’s management of LBP is well documented, little is known about GP’s management of neck pain. We aimed to describe GP’s management of new neck pain and compare this to GP’s management of new LBP in Australia between April 2000 and March 2010.

Methods

All GP–patient encounters for a new (i.e. first visit to any medical practitioner) neck pain or LBP problem were compared in terms of treatment delivered, referral patterns and requests for laboratory and imaging investigations.

Results

General practitioners in Australia have managed new neck pain and LBP problems at a rate of 3.1 and 5.8 per 1,000 GP–patient encounters, respectively. GP’s primarily utilised medications, in particular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to manage new neck and LBP problems and referred approximately 25% of all patients for imaging. Patients with new neck pain are more frequently managed using physical treatments and were referred more often to allied health professionals and specialists. In comparison, patients with new LBP were managed more frequently with medication, advice, provision of a sickness certificate and ordering of pathology tests.

Conclusions

This is the first time GP management of a new episode of neck pain has been documented using a nationally representative sample and it is also the first time that the management of back and neck pain has been compared. Despite guidelines endorsing a similar approach for the management of new neck pain and LBP, in actual clinical practice Australian GPs manage these two conditions differently.     

Management of facet joints osteoarthritis associated with chronic low back pain: A systematic review

IntroductionFacet joint injections (FJI) and medial branch blocks (MBB) can be employed for chronic low back pain (LBP) using different drugs such as corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, sarapin and local anaesthetics. This systematic review compares the results of injections obtained with different compounds in the management LBP originating from facet joints.MethodsThe present systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. The literature search was performed in October 2020. All the randomized clinical trials concerning injection treatments for chronic LBP. Drugs rather than steroids, hyaluronic acid, anaesthetics and sarapin were not considered, as well as those reporting outcomes from combined treatments. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the numeric rating scale (NRS) were retrieved.ResultsData from 587 patients were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 12.4 ± 10.5 months. The mean age was 51.3 ± 9.6 years old. 57% (335/587) of patients were women. Steroids promoted a reduction of NRS by 28% (P < 0.0001) and an improvement of the ODI by 13.2% (P = 0.005), and local anaesthetics produced an improvement of the ODI by 9.8% (P < 0.0001). Sarapin resulted in a reduction of NRS by 44% (P = 0.04) and an improvement the ODI by 14.9% (P = 0.004); sarapin combined with steroids promoted a reduction of NRS by 47% (P = 0.04) and an improvement of the ODI by 11.7% (P = 0.001).ConclusionInjections for chronic LBP deriving from facet joints osteoarthritis are encouraging, especially when considering MBB.Level of evidenceI, systematic review of RCTs.