Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians: myth or reality?

AIM: We studied the thirty-day mortality and morbidity rate to assess the value of conventional open repair vs endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in an elderly population presenting with a ruptured, symptomatic or asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) undergoing emergency, urgent or elective repair. METHODS: During the period from January 2004 to May 2007, 329 consecutive patients were treated for AAA in our Department. Among these, 81 (24.6%) were aged >80 years (mean age 83.6, range 80-95 years). These older patients were divided into groups according to their clinical presentation: ruptured AAA group (rAAA) - 22 cases (4 emergency EVAR, 18 emergency open repair); symptomatic non-ruptured AAA group (sAAA) - 15 cases (11 urgent EVAR, 4 urgent open repair); asymptomatic AAA group (asAAA) - 44 cases (32 elective EVAR, 12 elective open repair). The main outcome measures were 30-day mortality and 30-day morbidity rate. RESULTS: The mortality rate following open surgery vs EVAR was 66.6% vs 50% (P=NS) in the rAAA group, 25% vs 0% (P=NS) in the sAAA group, and 9% vs 3.2% (P=NS) in the asAAA group. When comparing postoperative morbidities in the octogenarians, 3 of the patients that received EVAR (6.4%) and 15 of those that received open repair (48.4%) had a severe complication (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The introduction of EVAR has considerably changed the balance of risks and benefits for AAA treatment. Our study confirms the high mortality rate for octogenarians with rAAA and haemodynamic instability, and supports the value of an active EVAR approach for octogenarians with AAA to prevent rupture. Moreover, the introduction of endovascular techniques as part of an overall treatment algorithm for ruptured AAAs appears to be potentially associated with improved outcomes in terms of mortality and morbidity as compared to open surgical repairs alone.     

Emergency endovascular treatment of acute symptomatic or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a single-center experience

The purpose of this study is to report our early experience with endovascular treatment of patients with symptomatic non-ruptured (sAAA) or ruptured (rAAA) abdominal aortic aneurysms. Between September 2005 and September 2008, all patients with a diagnosis of sAAA or rAAA were evaluated for endovascular suitability. We did not consider hemodynamic instability to be a contraindication for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Patients whose aneurysm anatomy was not suitable for EVAR received open repair (OR). A total of 46 patients with sAAA or rAAA underwent emergency EVAR: in particular, 18/46 patients were treated for sAAA and 28/46 for rAAA. Successful stent-graft deployment was achieved in 44 patients (96%); we had two open surgical conversions. The 30-day mortality rate was 19.5%. Nine patients died during the first 30 postoperative days: four patients died within 24 hours because of severe hypovolemic shock, two died of respiratory failure, one died as a result of bowel ischemia and two because of myocardial infarction after hospital discharge. Complete follow-up data were available for 35 patients (median 185 days; range 30-730 days). In conclusion, endovascular treatment is feasible and the early experience is promising. The capability of offering EVAR and OR for sAAA and rAAA according to our experience suggests that EVAR and OR should be regarded as complementary techniques to improve outcome of patients with acute AAA.     

Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic and Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Aim: To report our early experience with endovascular treatment of symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using the Talent bifurcated stent graft.

Patients-methods: From August 2003 to May 2007 nine patients with symptomatic AAA (sAAA) (two after previous endovascular repair and endoleak), and eleven patients with ruptured AAA (rAAA) (one with ruptured iliac aneurysm and one with spontaneous aortic rupture) were treated endovascularly. Seven bifurcated stent grafts, (six Talent), and two iliac extensions were implanted into the patients with sAAA, and nine bifurcated stent grafts (eight Talent) and two aorto-uniliacs were implanted into the patients with rAAA.

Results: The deployment of the endovascular device in the intended location was successful in all patients. There was no conversion to open surgery. One patient with sAAA died after stroke and sepsis resulting in 11.1% 30-day mortality in this group. One required re-intervention for a type I endoleak before his discharge. Eight patients were discharged and during a follow-up period of 4–42 months (median 18 months) they have remained well. Two patients with rAAA died in the 30-day postoperative period. Thirty-day mortality was 18.1%. An unintended occlusion of one renal artery was performed. There were 9 survivors. During a follow-up period of 17–45 months (median 26 months) one more died of myocardial infarction.

Conclusion: Initial experience with endovascular treatment of patients with symptomatic or ruptured AAA, using the Talent bifurcated stent graft is promising. Bifurcated endografts can be implanted into patients with rAAA. A larger number of patients and longer follow-up is necessary to arrive at more reliable conclusions.     

Presence of Chlamydia pneumoniae in abdominal aortic aneurysms is not associated with increased activity of matrix metalloproteinases.

OBJECTIVE: to test the hypothesis that the presence of Chlamydia pneumoniae (C. pneumoniae) in the wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is associated with increased activity of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and/or MMP-9.DESIGN: case-control study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: in a series of 40 patients with AAA > or =5cm in maximal cross-sectional diameter, C. pneumoniae-DNA was identified in the aneurysm wall by nested PCR in 14 (35%) patients. Another 14 C. pneumoniae-DNA-negative AAA patients from the same series, matched for gender and aneurysm diameter, were used as controls. In each group there were 7 asymptomatic (aAAA) and 7 ruptured (rAAA) aneurysms. MMP-2 and -9 activity was estimated in AAA wall biopsies by gelatin zymography. RESULTS: patients with a C. pneumoniae-DNA-positive aneurysm wall specimen showed an over-all lower activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9 (pro- and active enzyme) compared to the C. pneumoniae-DNA negative patients. However, there were no statistically significant differences in MMP activity between the two groups of patients with aAAA. Among patients with rAAA both pro-MMP-9 (p=0,026) and active-MMP-9 (p=0.007) were significantly lower in C. pneumoniae-DNA-positive patients compared to C. pneumoniae-DNA-negative patients, whereas there were no significant differences in pro-MMP-2 or active-MMP-2. CONCLUSION: this preliminary study does not support the hypothesis that the presence of C. pneumoniae in the AAA wall is associated with increased activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9.     

Early and mid-term results of a prospective observational study comparing emergency endovascular aneurysm repair with open surgery in both ruptured and unruptured acute abdominal aortic aneurysms

The aim of the paper is to prospectively describe early and mid-term outcomes for emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) versus open surgery in acute abdominal aortic aneurysms (aAAAs), both unruptured (symptomatic) and ruptured. We enrolled all consecutive patients treated for aAAA at our center between April 2002 and April 2008. The main outcome parameters were 30-day, 6- and 12-month mortality (all-cause and aneurysm-related). Two hundred forty patients were enrolled in the study. In the unruptured aAAA group (n = 111), 47 (42%) underwent eEVAR. The 30-day, 6- and 12-month mortality rates were 6, 13 and 15% in the eEVAR group versus 11% (NS), 13% (NS) and 16% (NS) in the open group, respectively. In the ruptured aAAA group (n = 129), 25 (19%) underwent eEVAR (mortality rates: 20, 28 and 36%, respectively) compared with 104 (81%) patients who underwent open surgery (mortality rates: 45% (P = 0.021), 60% (P = 0.004) and 63% (P = 0.014), respectively). In conclusion, the present study showed a reduced 30-day, 6- and 12-month mortality of eEVAR compared with open surgery in all patients with aAAA, mainly due to a lower mortality in the ruptured aAAA group. Late aneurysm-related mortality occurred only in the eEVAR group.     

The 30-day mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of gender, age, diameter and comorbidities

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of gender, age, the aneurysm diameter and comorbidity on the 30-day mortality after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: Between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 2006 all consecutive patients who underwent open repair for a ruptured AAA at the tertiary care of Catharina teaching Hospital were included in this study (N=186). Patients who underwent endovascular repair of their ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were excluded from this study. Patient and procedure characteristics were collected and analyzed in relation to 30-day mortality. The association between age, gender, diameter of AAA and comorbidity with 30-day mortality was analyzed with c2 are and logistic regression; a P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In this study there were 186 patients with ruptured AAA repair with an 30-day mortality of 36.6% (68/186). Among female patient 30-day mortality was 45.8% (11/24) compared with 35.2% (57/162) among male patients (P=0.31). Patients of 80 years and older had a 61.3% (19/31) 30-day mortality where younger patients had 33% (51/155) 30-day mortality (P=0.02). Thirty-day mortality was 47.2% (17/36) for patients with an AAA less than 65 mm compared with 34% (36/104) for patients with an AAA of 65 mm or larger (P=0.16). Multivariate analysis demonstrated age was a significant predictor of ruptured AAA repair mortality (P=0.017). CONCLUSION: In this study, age was the only significant risk factor of 30-day mortality after open repair in patients with ruptured AAA.     

Comparison of morphologic features of intact and ruptured aneurysms of infrarenal abdominal aorta

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been suggested as a technique to improve outcome of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Whether this technique becomes an established treatment will depend, in part, on the anatomy of ruptured AAA. METHODS: The anatomy of intact and ruptured AAA seen in a university department of vascular surgery over 5 years was reviewed. Aneurysm anatomy was assessed with spiral computed tomographic angiography. Suitability for EVAR was assessed from the dimensions of the proximal neck and common iliac arteries. Neck length less than 15 mm, neck width greater than 30 mm, and common iliac artery diameter greater than 22 mm were declared unsuitable for EVAR. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-three patients with intact AAA and 46 with ruptured AAA were identified. Larger intact aneurysms were significantly associated with longer renal artery-bifurcation distance and more complex proximal neck architecture. In this sample, patients with ruptured AAA were more likely to have larger aneurysms with shorter and narrower proximal necks. Significantly more intact aneurysms were morphologically suitable for endovascular repair compared with ruptured AAA (78% vs 43%; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ruptured AAA are less likely to be suitable for endovascular repair than are intact AAA, most probably because of larger diameter at presentation. Open repair will likely remain the treatment of choice in most patients with ruptured AAA, because of current morphologic constraints of endovascular repair.     

���Ը����������붯��Ӳ���Ը����������ٴ��ص㼰Զ����Ч�����о�

??Case-control study on clinical features and long term effect of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm in comparison with atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysm WANG Shao-ye, ZHANG Jian, YIN Ming-di, et al. Department of Vascular Surgery, the First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
Corresponding author: ZHANG Jian, E-mail: jianzhang_cmu@yahoo.com.cn
Abstract Objective To analyze clinical features and long term effect of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (iAAA). Methods Between 1988 and 2008, 412 cases of AAA in the First Hospital of China Medical University were performed elective surgical operations. Eleven (2.7%) of them were diagnosed as iAAA. The former group was matched in a case control fashion to a group of 33 patients with aAAA with similar characteristics of age, gender and preoperative risk factors. All available clinical, pathologic and postoperative variables were reviewed retrospectively, and the two groups were compared. Results In comparison with aAAA, patients with iAAA were more symptomatic significantly (100% vs. 42.4%, P=0.001) and had larger aneurysm size on admission ??(7.4±0.7)cm vs. (6.3±0.9) cm??P=0.006??, and preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate was found to be elevated significantly ??(44.5±9.1)mm/h vs. (11.4±5.4)mm/h??P<0.05??. Surgical morbidity and mortality rates did not differ between two groups. The operation time of patients with iAAA was longer than patients with aAAA significantly ??(308±36)min vs. (224±46)min, P<0.05??, and cross-clamp time was similar in both groups??(41.5±6.2) min vs. (41.8±6.2)min, P= 0.92??. A five-year survival rate analysis showed no significant difference between two groups (P=0.711) . Conclusion Despite the more symptomatic, larger size and long operation time of iAAA, iAAA can be treated with low morbidity and mortality similar as aAAA now. Long term effect of iAAA is of no difference from aAAA.     

Audit of 200 consecutive aortic aneurysm repairs carried out by a single surgeon in a district hospital: results of surgery and factors affecting outcome.

It has been suggested that surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) be confined to designated centres. A prospective audit of 200 consecutive AAA repairs at a district general hospital was performed between 1981 and 1990. The 30-day mortality rates for elective, symptomatic and ruptured aneurysm repair were 1.4%, 3.5% and 30%, respectively. The major factor affecting outcome after the mode of presentation was the age of the patient, with 30-day mortality rates for emergency treatment increasing from 21% (age range 60-69 years) to 42% (age range 70-79 years). This mortality rate for ruptured aneurysms is an underestimate, with two-thirds of patients with rupture dying before reaching hospital and some patients dying in hospital undiagnosed. The major contribution to improved overall mortality would therefore be detection before rupture (usually by ultrasound) and improved diagnostic accuracy. Many patients with ruptured aneurysms had symptoms for only a short period before presentation (42% for less than 6 h) and required urgent surgery (26% reached theatre within 1 h). These two factors make long-distance transfer of these patients an unrealistic option. The concentration of this type of surgery in relatively few centres will distance the patient from their relatives and reduce the opportunity for the majority of junior doctors to acquire an understanding of the presentation, natural history and management of aortic aneurysms. This understanding when combined with a screening programme is likely to have a far greater impact on the overall mortality from AAA than restricting the centres for surgical treatment.     

The impact of gender on presentation, therapy, and mortality of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States, 2001-2004

INTRODUCTION: The elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) may decrease a patient's risk of rupture and confers a significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate than emergency repair. Previous works have shown that AAA rupture rates are higher in women compared to men, and that women have higher associated in-hospital mortality rates. This study was performed to evaluate, currently, to what extent patient gender influences presentation and treatment of AAA and the associated outcomes in the United States. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used, with pertinent ICD-9 codes, to identify all patient-discharges that occurred with the primary diagnosis of intact (iAAA) or ruptured/dissecting (rAAA) abdominal aortic aneurysms between the years 2001 and 2004. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses of variables were performed. RESULTS: An estimated 220,403 AAA patient-discharges were identified during the study period. 37,016 (17%) patients presented with rAAA. A higher percentage of women with AAA presented with rupture compared to men (21% vs 16%; odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.54). This rupture rate did not significantly change from 2001 to 2004 (P = .85 for trend). For iAAA, women had higher odds of in-hospital mortality than men (OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.24-2.07). Compared to men, in-hospital mortality rates for women with iAAA were higher for both endovascular (2.1% vs 0.83%, P < .0001) and open repairs (6.1% vs 4.0%, P < .0001). For iAAA, fewer women underwent endovascular repair (32.4% vs 46.7%, P < .0001; O.R. 0.59, 95% CI, 0.52-0.67). For patients who presented with rAAA, women were less likely to undergo surgical intervention compared to men (59% vs 70%, P < .0001). For those that underwent repair, women had higher in-hospital mortality rates than men (43% vs 36%, P < .0001; OR 1.49, 95% CI, 1.16-1.91). CONCLUSION: A higher percentage of women currently present with aneurysm rupture. They have higher in-hospital mortality rates for both iAAA and rAAA. This gender difference in the outcomes following repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has persisted over time, the cause of which is not explained by these or previous data, a fact that warrants further investigation.     

Clamp before you cut: Proximal control of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using endovascular balloon occlusion--Case reports

While the mortality rate for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has declined over the last several decades, the rate for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) has unfortunately remained disturbingly high. Undiagnosed aneurysms may present with little warning until abdominal pain, syncope, and hypotension signify rupture. Fifty percent of patients with ruptured aneurysms die before reaching a medical facility, and their survival is highly dependent on hemodynamic stability at presentation. The degree of rupture containment and comorbid status of the patient determine hemodynamic stability. Endovascular stent grafting has significantly improved perioperative morbidity and mortality rates for elective AAA repair, and some of the same endovascular techniques can be used to obtain proximal control in patients presenting with RAAA. We describe 3 consecutive cases of RAAA where proximal control was obtained using a percutaneously placed, transfemoral aortic occlusion balloon before induction of anesthesia.     

Endovascular treatment of ruptured and symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To report the experience of endovascular repair (ER) in patients with ruptured and symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA and sAAA), comparing results with a cohort of controls who underwent open repair (OR) of sAAA or rAAA. DESIGN: A historically controlled cohort study. MATERIALS: Retrospective data from 21 patients who underwent ER and prospective data from 23 patients who underwent OR. METHODS: Results were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: Eleven ER patients had sAAAs and 10 had rAAAs. Nine OR patients had rAAAs and 13 had sAAAs. Thirty-day mortality was 11% in patients with rAAA in the ER group, and 54% in the OR group (p=0.03). There were no post-operative deaths in the patients who had an sAAA in the ER group, and one death in the patients who had sAAA in the OR group. Results as expressed as mean ER value versus mean OR value and p-value. ER was associated with significant reductions in the length of operation (2.6 versus 3.1h, p=0.03), blood transfusion requirements (0.86 versus 10.7 units p<0.01), time in critical care (1.5 versus 6.1 days, p=0.02), and total hospital stay (8.5 versus 17.5 days, p=0.01) compared with OR. There was no difference in time from admission to arrival in theatre between the two groups (3.4 versus 5.0h, p=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with rAAA and sAAA that are suitable for stenting, ER has reduced mortality compared with open repair. Assessment for ER does not cause a pre-operative delay, operating time is reduced, blood transfusion requirements are reduced and there is a faster recovery.     

Endovascular repair or surveillance of patients with small AAA.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) treated in a prospective trial of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to patients randomized to the surveillance arm of the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. METHOD: All patients with small AAA (< or = 5.5 cm diameter) treated with a stent graft (EVARsmall) in the multicenter AneuRx clinical trial from 1997 to 1999 were reviewed with follow up through 2003. A subgroup of patients (EVARmatch) who met the age (60-76 years) and aneurysm size (4.0-5.5 cm diameter) inclusion criteria of the UK Small Aneurysm Trial were compared to the published results of the surveillance patient cohort (UKsurveil) of the UK Small Aneurysm Trial (NEJM 346:1445, 2002). Endpoints of comparison were aneurysm rupture, fatal aneurysm rupture, operative mortality, aneurysm related death and overall mortality. The total patient years of follow-up for EVAR patients was 1369 years and for UK patients was 3048 years. Statistical comparisons of EVARmatch and UKsurveil patients were made for rates per 100 patient years of follow up (/100 years) to adjust for differences in follow-up time. RESULTS: The EVARsmall group of 478 patients comprised 40% of the total number of patients treated during the course of the AneuRx clinical trial. The EVARmatch group of 312 patients excluded 151 patients for age < 60 or > 76 years and 15 patients for AAA diameter < 4 cm. With the exception of age, there were no significant differences between EVARsmall and EVARmatch in pre-operative factors or post-operative outcomes. In comparison to the UKsurveil group of 527 patients, the EVARmatch group was slightly older (70 +/- 4 vs. 69 +/- 4 years, p = 0.009), had larger aneurysms (5.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 4.6 +/- 0.4 cm, p < 0.001), fewer women (7 vs. 18%, p < 0.001), and had a higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension and a lower prevalence of smoking at baseline. Ruptures occurred in 1.6% of EVARmatch patients and 5.1% of UKsurveil patients; this difference was not significant when adjusted for the difference in length of follow up. Fatal aneurysm rupture rate, adjusted for follow up time, was four times higher in UKsurveil (0.8/100 patient years) than in EVARmatch (0.2/100 patient years, p < 0.001); this difference remained significant when adjusted for difference in gender mix. Elective operative mortality rate was significantly lower in EVARmatch (1.9%) than in UKsurveil (5.9%, p < 0.01). Aneurysm-related death rate was two times higher in UKsurveil (1.6/100 patient years) than in EVARmatch (0.8/100 patient years, p = 0.03). All-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in UKsurveil (8.3/100 patient years) than in EVARmatch (6.4/100 patient years, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: It appears that endovascular repair of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (4.0-5.5 cm) significantly reduces the risk of fatal aneurysm rupture and aneurysm-related death and improves overall patient survival compared to an ultrasound surveillance strategy with selective open surgical repair.     

Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Outcome analysis is increasingly being used to develop health-care policy and direct patient referral. For example, the Leapfrog Group health-care quality initiative has proposed "evidence-based hospital" referral criteria for specific procedures including elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA-R). These criteria include an annual hospital AAA operative volume exceeding 50 cases and provision of intensive care unit (ICU) care by board-certified intensivists. Outcomes after AAA-R are reportedly influenced by presentation (intact vs. ruptured), operative approach (endovascular vs. open, transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal), surgeon subspecialty, case volume (hospital and surgeon), and provision of postoperative care by an intensivist. The purpose of this study was to compare our single-center results with those of high-volume centers to assess the validity of the concept that surrogate markers, such as case volume or intensivist involvement, can be used to estimate procedural outcome. A retrospective review was performed of AAA-Rs at one low-volume academic medical center from January 1994 to March 2005. Demographic data, aneurysm diameter and location, operative indications, and repair approach were documented. Postoperative complications, mortality rates, and hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS) were noted and compared to established benchmarks. During the study period, 270 patients underwent AAA-R (annual mean = 27 hospital cases and 13.4 cases/attending vascular surgeon). ICU care was provided by a dedicated vascular surgery service without routine intensivist involvement. Open, elective, infrarenal AAA-R was performed in 161 patients (60%), with a 2.5% hospital mortality rate (30-day, 3.1%). Thirty-three (12%) patients underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), with no mortality. Both ICU (3.7 vs. 1.4 days, p = 0.03) and hospital (9.2 vs. 2.8 days, p = 0.002) LOS were significantly reduced after EVAR compared to open repair. Hospital LOS was significantly lower after open retroperitoneal repair compared to transperitoneal repair (6.1 vs. 10.3 days, p = 0.001). Thirty-five patients (13%) underwent ruptured AAA-R, with only 34.3% mortality (in-hospital and 30-day). Forty-one patients (15%) underwent repair of complex aortic aneurysms, with 14.1% mortality. There are increasing societal and economic pressures to direct patient referrals to "centers of excellence" for specific surgical procedures. Although our institution meets neither of the Leapfrog Group's proposed criteria, our mortality and LOS for both intact and ruptured infrarenal AAA-R are equivalent or superior to published benchmarks for high-volume hospitals. Individual institutional outcome results such as these suggest that patient referral and care should be based upon actual, carefully verified outcome data rather than utilization of surrogate markers such as case volume and subspecialist involvement in postoperative care.     

Endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-risk-surgical patients.

PURPOSE: Following the publication of a prospective randomized trial (EVAR2) that questioned the benefit of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) for high-surgical-risk patients, we evaluated our own initial and long-term results with endovascular AAA repair for this patient population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2005, 115 patients with an AAA managed by an aortic endograft were entered in a registry. Data concerning diagnosis, operative risk, treatment, and follow-up were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis for all patients considered to be poor candidates for surgery. Patients with a ruptured AAA and those who were good surgical candidates were excluded from analysis. The main goal was evaluation of the operative mortality and the long-term survival of these patients. Secondary goals were determination of the frequency of secondary operations, the outcome of the aneurysm sac, and primary and secondary patency rates after aortic endograft placement. RESULTS: A total of 92 high-surgical-risk patients treated by an endograft were entered in this study. Sixty-seven patients (73%) were classed ASA III and 18 (20%) were ASA IV (20%). Mean aneurysm diameter was 58 mm+/-9 mm. The technical success rate was 99%. Operative mortality was 4.3% (4 cases). Four patients required re-intervention during the mean follow-up of 18 months. The survival rate at 3 yr was 85%. One type I endoleak (1%) and 9 type II endoleaks (9.7%) occurred during the follow-up period. Primary and secondary patency rates at 3 yr were respectively 96% and 100%. CONCLUSION: Our initial and long-term results with endograft repair of AAA in high-surgical-risk patients were satisfactory. These results appear to justify endovascular repair for this patient population.     

Influence of presentation on outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: In the absence of formal screening abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are detected in an opportunistic manner. Many remain asymptomatic and undetected until they rupture. Incidentally discovered small AAAs are entered into a surveillance programme until they reach a suitable size for repair. The aim of this study was to examine trends in the management of AAA and whether the method of presentation had an effect on subsequent mortality. DESIGN: Observational study in UK district general hospital. MATERIALS/METHODS: This study reports a single surgeon case series identified using a prospectively maintained database. Data on mode of presentation, management and mortality were retrieved from case notes, PIMS hospital database and the Office of National Statistics. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients were referred with AAAs between 1992 and 2004, 78% presenting in elective circumstances. The surveillance programme fed 33% of the operated cases. Two aneurysms ruptured whilst under surveillance. Overall elective operative mortality was 11.8% and has progressively decreased over time. Thirty-day operated mortality was significantly lower in patients having a period of surveillance than those having immediate elective repair (2.3 vs. 16.3%, p=0.018). A slight reduction in emergency AAA repairs was noted over the study period (r2=0.6) although registered aneurysm deaths continue to increase (r2=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Elective mortality following AAA surgery decreased over the study period. Outcome was better in those patients who had surgery for aneurysms that had been under surveillance. Despite opportunistic screening the population adjusted mortality rate of aortic aneurysms showed a progressive increase. A reduction in deaths from aneurysms is unlikely without a formal screening programme.     

To what extent has endovascular aneurysm repair influenced abdominal aortic aneurysm management in the state of Illinois?

PURPOSE: This study was performed using population-based data to determine the changing trends in the techniques for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in the state of Illinois during the past 9 years and to examine the extent to which endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has influenced overall AAA management. METHODS: All records of patients who underwent AAA repair (1995 to 2003 inclusive) were retrieved from the Illinois Hospital Association COMPdata database. The outcome as determined by in-hospital mortality was analyzed according to intervention type (open vs EVAR) and indication (elective repair vs ruptured AAA). Data were stratified by age, gender, and hospital type (university vs community setting) and then analyzed using both univariate (chi 2 , t tests) and multivariate (stepwise logistic regression) techniques. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2003, 14,517 patients underwent AAA repair (85% for elective and 15% for ruptured AAA). The average age was 71.4 +/- 7.9 years, and 76% were men. For elective cases, open repair was performed in 86% and EVAR in 14%; and for ruptured cases, open repair in 97% and EVAR in 3%. Elective EVAR was associated with lower in-hospital mortality compared with open repair regardless of age. No differences were observed with age after either type of repair for a ruptured aneurysm. Men had a lower in-hospital mortality compared with women for open repair of both elective and ruptured aneurysms. For EVAR, the mortality of an elective repair was lower in men, but there was no difference after a ruptured AAA. In men, the difference in mortality between elective open repair and EVAR was significant; the type of institution did not influence outcome. Patients >80 years of age had a higher mortality after open repair for both elective and ruptured AAA and after EVAR of a ruptured AAA. The average length of stay was 9.9 days for open elective repair, 13.1 days after open repair of a ruptured AAA, and 3.6 days for EVAR. The independent predictors of higher in-hospital mortality were female gender, age >80 years, diagnosis (ruptured vs open), and procedure (open vs EVAR). The year of the procedure and type of hospital (university vs community) were not predictive of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR has had a significant impact on AAA management in Illinois over a relatively short time period. In this population-based review, EVAR was associated with a significantly decreased in-hospital mortality and length of stay. Octogenarians had higher mortality after both types of repair, with the exception of elective EVAR.     

Advantages and pitfalls of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in high-risk patients

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has been suggested for older men. Our aim was to determine the effect of participant selection on prevalence and treatment suitability. Men aged 65 to 75 years attending cardiology clinics composed the high-risk group; the control group was from the community. AAA screening was performed, with follow-up or surgery arranged. Four hundred eight of 651 (62.7%) high-risk men and 109 of 908 (45.0%; p< .0001) men attended from the community. In the high-risk patients, 40 AAAs were diagnosed, with a mean diameter of 41.4 mm (+/-10.4 mm). In the control group, 22 new AAAs were found, with an average size of 40.9 mm (+/-10.4 mm). Higher polypharmacy existed in the high-risk group (4.6+/-2.2 vs 2.3+/-2.0; p< .0001). More aneurysm patients were on dual-antiplatelet therapy (32.5% vs 15.4%; p= .048) compared with the overall high-risk group. In this group, three underwent surgery; one was anatomically unsuitable for endovascular repair and medically unfit for open repair. Two in the control group had surgery. A higher prevalence of AAA is encountered in high-risk men. Most aneurysms are small; however, a significant proportion of the aneurysms detected were of a size that would warrant repair. The decision to perform surgical repair is likely to be influenced by the comorbid medical conditions, which placed the patients in the high-risk category.     

Diagnosis and treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. A report of 82 cases.

Resection for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is being performed with decreasing mortality and morbidity. A retrospective study on 82 consecutive patients with AAAs admitted during the period 1974-1977 shoowed that 66 had a non-ruptured aneurysm and 16 a ruptured aneurysm. The mean age of the patients was 66,7 years. Concomitant disease was frequent. Operative mortality aneurysms and 37% in the group with ruptured aneurysms.     

Anatomic suitability of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms for endovascular repair

Mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) remains high despite improvements in anesthesia, postoperative intensive care, and surgical techniques. Recent small series and single-center experiences suggest that endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for rAAAs is feasible and may improve short-term survival. However, the applicability of EVAR to all cases of rAAA is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical suitability of ruptured aneurysms for EVAR as determined by preoperative cross-sectional imaging. A contemporary consecutive series of rAAAs presenting to a tertiary academic center was retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative radiographic imaging was reviewed and assessed for endovascular compatibility based on currently available EVAR devices. Patients with aneurysm morphology demonstrating neck diameter >32 mm, neck length <10 mm, neck angulation >60 degrees, severe iliac tortuosity, or external iliac diameter <6 mm were deemed noncandidates for EVAR. Forty-seven rAAAs were treated over a 10-year period, with 47% of patients presenting with free rupture and 60% of patients transferred from outside hospitals. Five (11%) patients were treated with EVAR, all over the past 2 years, while the remaining 42 patients underwent open repair. Preoperative imaging was available for review in 43 (91%) patients, and morphological measurements indicated that 49% would have been candidates for EVAR with currently available devices. Criteria precluding EVAR in this cohort were inadequate neck length in 73%, unsuitable iliac access in 23%, large neck diameter in 18%, and severe neck angulation in 14%. Overall 30-day mortality was 34%, and 1-year mortality was 42%. Candidates for EVAR were more likely than non-EVAR candidates to be male (95% vs. 68%, p = 0.046) and to have smaller sac diameters (7.0 vs. 8.5 cm, p = 0.02) and longer neck lengths (24.1 vs. 8.6 mm, p < 0.0001); less likely to have a >60 degree angulated neck (10% vs. 45%, p = 0.0002), larger external iliac diameter (8.9 vs. 7.3 mm, p = 0.015), and less blood loss during surgical repair (2.4 vs. 6.0 L, p = 0.02); and more likely to be discharged home (71% vs. 25%, p = 0.05). There were no differences in 30-day, 1-year, or overall mortality between candidates for EVAR and noncandidates. Only 49% of patients with rAAAs in this consecutive series were found to be candidates for EVAR with conventional stent-graft devices. Differences in demographics, aneurysm morphology, and outcomes between candidates and noncandidates undergoing open repair suggest that differential risks apply to ruptured aneurysm patients. Protocols and future reports of EVAR for rAAAs should be tailored to these results. Device and technique modifications are necessary to increase the applicability of EVAR for rAAAs.