Hysteroscopic endomyometrial resection of three uterine sarcomas.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience with three uterine sarcomas associated with hysteroscopic endometrial ablation. DESIGN: Cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Three of 2402 women undergoing hysteroscopic endometrial ablation who had uterine sarcomas. INTERVENTION: Hysteroscopic endomyometrial resection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and two carcinosarcomas were resected. After hysterectomy in two patients, no residual cancer was identified in one of them. The third patient was an 82-year-old woman with moderate menorrhagia who refused hysterectomy. After endomyometrial resection she remained amenorrheic for the last 14 months of her life. CONCLUSION: From our experience the incidence of uterine sarcomas is approximately 1/800 women undergoing hysteroscopic ablation for abnormal uterine bleeding. Complete endomyometrial resection is feasible and may be offered as diagnostic and palliative therapy in women at high risk for hysterectomy.     

Resectoscopic surgery may be an alternative to hysterectomy in high-risk women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Endometrial hyperplasia is found in 2% to 10% of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Up to 43% of patients with cytologic atypia harbor coexisting adenocarcinoma, and approximately 20% to 52% of atypical hyperplasias, if untreated, progress to cancer. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia encountered during routine resectoscopic surgery in women with AUB and to evaluate the role of resectoscopic surgery in the management of women with AUB and atypical endometrial hyperplasia who refused and/or were at high risk for hysterectomy. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: From January 1990 through December 2005, the senior author (GAV) performed primary resectoscopic surgery in 3401 women with AUB. Among these, there were 22 women with atypical (17 complex, 5 simple) endometrial hyperplasia. INTERVENTIONS: All women underwent hysteroscopic evaluation and partial (n = 3) or complete (n = 19) endometrial electrocoagulation and/or resection. Subsequently, 6 women had hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median (range) for age, parity, and body mass index were 55 years (24-78 years), 2 (0-4), and 30.1 kg/m2 (22.5-52.2 kg/m2), respectively. Among the 3401 women, there were 22 cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia, 12 of which were incidentally diagnosed at the time of hysteroscopy (complex 10, simple 2, incidence 0.35%). After hysteroscopic diagnosis or confirmation of diagnosis, 6 women underwent hysterectomy and BSO. Of the remaining 16 women, followed for a median of 5 years (range 1.5-12 years), 1 was lost to follow-up, 1 had only a biopsy to preserve fertility, 1 died from lung cancer after 4 years, and 1 died from colon cancer after 5 years. One patient developed endometrial cancer after 10.5 years with postmenopausal bleeding. She remains alive and well 3.5 years after hysterectomy and BSO. The remaining 11 patients are amenorrheic at a median follow-up of 6 years (range 1.5-12 years). CONCLUSIONS: Resectoscopic surgery in 3391 women with AUB detected 12 incidental cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (incidence 0.35%). Skillful resectoscopic surgery may be an alternative to hysterectomy in women with AUB and atypical endometrial hyperplasia, who refuse or are at high-risk for hysterectomy and who are compliant with regular and long-term follow-up.     

Endometrial adenocarcinoma encountered at the time of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy and possible role of treatment of hysteroscopic endometrial resection in women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) diagnosed with endometrial adenocarcinoma. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University-affiliated center. PATIENTS: Thirteen women with AUB and eight with postmenopausal bleeding. INTERVENTION: Preablation endometrial office biopsy and hysteroscopic evaluation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preablation endometrial biopsy was inadequate, inconclusive, or difficult to obtain in these women, and endometrial cancer was found at the time of resectoscopic surgery. Total endomyometrial resection including the tubal ostia was completed in eight women (group 1) and partial resection in five (group 2). Endometrial adenocarcinoma was confirmed histologically in all patients. A small focus of cancer was found in only two women in group 1 after total resection; in one the procedure was performed 9 years earlier and in the other it was completed hastily after absorption of 800 ml of 1.5% glycine irrigation solution. In women in group 2 malignancy was highly suspected and total resection was considered unwise. CONCLUSION: All patients were alive and well 0.5 to 9 years after hysterectomy, with no evidence of recurrent cancer.     

Resectoscopic surgery in 10 women with abnormal uterine bleeding and atypical endometrial hyperplasia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of the resectoscope in the diagnosis and treatment of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia. DESIGN: Retrospective case series (Canadian Task Force classification III-3). SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Ten women. Intervention. Hysteroscopic evaluation after preoperative endometrial biopsy indicated simple hyperplasia without atypia, complex hyperplasia with atypia, or inadequate specimen. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Atypical hyperplasia was confirmed in eight patients after total endomyometrial resection. Hysterectomy was offered to all patients but accepted by only two: one for bilateral ovarian serous cystadenomas and the second for a granulosa cell ovarian tumor. No residual endometrium was found in hysterectomy specimens. Seven women were amenorrheic and well 1 to 9 years after resection. An additional patient with amenorrhea died from colon cancer 2 years after resection. CONCLUSION: Resectoscopic surgery confirmed or detected atypical endometrial hyperplasia in eight women and excluded it in two patients with AUB and a previous diagnosis of simple hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, or inadequate specimen. Skillful resectoscopic surgery may be an alternative to hysterectomy in selected patients with atypical hyperplasia who are compliant with regular and long-term follow-up.     

Endometrioid adenocarcinoma treated by hysteroscopic endomyometrial resection

A 53-year-old multiparous woman, with no identifiable risk factor for endometrial cancer, presented with menorrhagia. She had been treated with oral contraceptives for 3 years. Office endometrial biopsy indicated well-differentiated villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. The patient refused hysterectomy and would consent only to hysteroscopic resection. She remains alive and well, with no clinical evidence of recurrence 5 years after resection. We propose that skillful resectoscopic surgery, under specific circumstance, may be an appropriate alternative treatment to hysterectomy for some early uterine malignancies.     

Miscellaneous Uterine Malignant Neoplasms Detected during Hysteroscopic Surgery

Study ObjectivesTo estimate the incidence of incidental miscellaneous uterine malignant neoplasms other than endometrioid adenocarcinoma detected during routine resectoscopic surgery in women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and to examine the effect of hysteroscopic surgery on long-term clinical outcome.DesignProspective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).SettingUniversity-affiliated teaching hospital.PatientsWomen with AUB.InterventionFrom January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2008, one of the authors (G.A.V.) and several fellows performed primary hysteroscopic surgery at St. Joseph's Health Care in 3892 women with AUB. Of the 7 with malignant disease, one underwent hysteroscopic partial (n = 1) or complete (n = 6) rollerball electrocoagulation or endomyometrial resection. After diagnosis of uterine cancer, the women were counseled about the disease and management in accord with established clinical practice guidelines. Follow-up with office visits and telephone interviews ranged from 2 to 8 years (median, 6 years).Measurements and Main ResultsOf the 3892 women, 4 had undiagnosed and 3 had suspected miscellaneous uterine malignant neoplasms including 1 endometrial stromal sarcoma, 2 carcinosarcomas, 2 atypical polypoid adenomyomas of the endometrium, 1 minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the cervix, and 1 smooth-muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential. At 2 to 8 years of follow-up, 1 patient died accidentally after 1 year, 1 died of carcinomatosis of either coexisting breast cancer or a carcinosarcoma (postmortem examination was declined) after 1 year, and 5 were alive and well.ConclusionResectoscopic surgery in women with miscellaneous uterine malignant lesions not adversely affect 5-year survival and long-term prognosis.     

Hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps: a study of 195 cases

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the therapeutic efficiency of hysteroscopic resection for the treatment of endometrial polyps in women with abnormal uterine bleeding and postmenopausal metrorrhagia. SETTING: University hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive patient follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1987 to 1997, 195 patients with haemorrhagic endometrial polyps were treated with hysteroscopic resection in our department. RESULTS: Five complications occurred, but no major complications were noted. A total of 89.2% of the patients remained in contact after hospitalization. After long term follow-up (5.2 years), successful results were obtained in 80% of the patients with polyp resection without associated endometrial ablation. Further surgery (hysterectomy) was required in only five women. CONCLUSION: Transcervical resection is the gold standard for treatment of endometrial polyps.     

Long-term impact and risk factors for hysterectomy after hysteroscopic surgery for menorrhagia

The objective of this study was to assess the long-term impact of management and establish the incidence of hysterectomy, and to identify factors predictive of failure of the procedure among women who had undergone hysteroscopic endometrial resection with or without myomectomy for menorrhagia. Clinical history and data on additional treatment and follow-up status were obtained by medical record review and postal questionnaire for 279 women who had undergone hysteroscopic surgery. Follow-up data were available for 259 (93%) cases, and the mean follow-up was 6.0 years. Subsequent hysterectomy was the primary endpoint, and its incidence was calculated by survival analysis. Univariant analysis and Cox regression model were used to identify predictors of failure. Myomas, polyps, adenomyosis, or endometrial hyperplasia were found in 40.9% of hysteroscopic procedures. Perioperative complications occurred in 5.7% and late complications in 7.7%. During the follow-up period, 97 (37.5%) of 259 women underwent at least one gynecological procedure. The incidence of hysterectomy was 23.6% (95% confidence interval: 18.8–29.1%). Positive predictive factors for hysterectomy were long uterine cavity (≥9 cm) and tubal ligation. Most (82.8%) of the 198 women who did not undergo hysterectomy had postoperative oligo- or amenorrhea. Hormone replacement therapy was common (67%) among postmenopausal women after endometrial resection. Hysteroscopic resection of the endometrium and concomitant hysteroscopic resection of fibroids for the treatment of menorrhagia is a suitable alternative to hysterectomy and offers lasting results. A large uterine cavity indicating possible uterine pathology and tubal ligation associated with hematometra increase the risk of hysterectomy.     

Long-term outcome of hysteroscopic endometrial resection with or without myomectomy in patients with menorrhagia

Objectives  To evaluate the long-term outcomes and hysterectomy rates after hysteroscopic endometrial resection with or without myomectomy for menorrhagia. Study design  Fifty-three women who had submucous myomas with intramural extension of less than 50% and smaller than 5 cm in diameter underwent endometrial resection and concomitant hysteroscopic myomectomy. Each of them was matched with a patient who had no submucous myomas and who had been treated by endometrial resection only. These two groups were compared for operative outcomes, additional procedures, outcome of menstrual bleeding and for subsequent hysterectomy, which was the endpoint of this study. Results  During the mean follow-up period of 6.5 years, 18 (34.6%) women with endometrial resection and myomectomy and 21 (39.6%) without myomectomy underwent at least one gynecological procedure. Hysterectomy was performed in 26.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16.8–40.3] of the patients with myomectomy and in 17.0% (95% CI 9.2–29.2) of the patients without myomectomy (P = 0.22). The main indications for hysterectomy were pain and spotting bleeding in seven out of 14 cases with myomectomy and in four out of nine with endometrial resection only. Leiomyomas were found in 12 out of the 14 women who had hysterectomy after hysteroscopic myomectomy and in four out of nine with hysterectomy after endometrial resection only (P = 0.06). Most (75.6%) of the 82 women who had not required hysterectomy had reached menopause. All the patients without hysterectomy in both groups reported amenorrhea or slight bleeding, and this response maintained for years after the treatment. Conclusion  Endometrial resection may be combined with hysteroscopic myomectomy without a significant increase or decrease in hysterectomy rates during a long-term follow-up.     

Long-term outcome of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation without endometrial preparation

OBJECTIVE: To describe the three-step hysteroscopic endometrial ablation (EA) technique without endometrial preparation, and its long-term outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Four hundred and thirty-eight premenopausal women with menorrhagia or menometrorrhagia underwent three-step hysteroscopic EA, which consists of rollerball ablation of the fundus and cornual regions, a cutting loop endomyometrial resection of the rest of the cavity, and rollerball redessication of the whole pre-ablated uterine cavity. The main outcome measures were menstrual status, level of satisfaction with the procedure, and the need for repeat ablation or hysterectomy. Questionnaires were completed for 385 women (87.9%) with a mean follow-up of 48.2 months. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four responders (47.8%) reported amenorrhea; 177 (46%) had light to normal flow. One patient (0.3%) underwent repeat ablation and 20 (5.2%) underwent hysterectomy: 15 (3.9%) because of endometrial ablation failure and 5 (1.3%) because of indications unrelated to the ablation (three cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and two cases of fibroids). Two hundred and ninety-two patients (75.8%) were very satisfied, and 78 (20.3%) satisfied with the results. No major complications occurred and three women (0.8%) became pregnant during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: EA is safe and effective means of treating of menorrhagia and menometrorrhagia in premenopausal women, and helps avoid hysterectomy in 95% of patients suffering from heavy bleeding, with or without uterine fibroids. Women should be informed that the procedure is not contraceptive and that pregnancy is possible after treatment.     

Endometrial resection following levonorgestrel intrauterine system treatment for menorrhagia

The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes and hysterectomy rates after hysteroscopic endometrial resection among women following use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for menorrhagia and among women never using this. Forty-five women who had used LNG-IUS for treatment of menorrhagia underwent endometrial resection. Each of them was matched with a patient who had never used LNG-IUS and who had been treated by endometrial resection for menorrhagia (control group). These two groups were compared for operative outcomes, additional procedures, outcome of menstrual bleeding, and for subsequent hysterectomy, which was the endpoint of this study. During the mean follow-up period of 5.8 years, 19 (44%) women undergoing endometrial resection following LNG-IUS and 14 (31%) with endometrial resection and without use of LNG-IUS underwent at least one gynecological procedure. Hysterectomy was performed in 14 (33%) women who had used LNG-IUS and in seven (16%) in the control group (p = 0.05). The main indications for hysterectomy were pain and enlarged uterus; leiomyomas and/or adenomyosis were found in specimens of the uterus extirpated, except for two cases with hematometra in both groups. Patients not hysterectomized reported amenorrhea or slight bleeding, and this response persisted for years after the treatment. In conclusion, two of three women avoided hysterectomy when endometrial resection followed LNG-IUS although hysterectomy rate was higher than those who had never used the device. Hysteroscopic surgery may be considered as an alternative to hysterectomy after discontinuation of LNG-IUS for menorrhagia.     

Hysteroscopic resection of endometrial hyperplasia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hysteroscopic resection of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. DESIGN: Pilot feasibility study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). SETTING: Department of gynecology at a general hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy-three women. Intervention. Transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection under general or spinal anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Efficacy of treatment was based on hysteroscopic and histologic regression of endometrial hyperplasia and subjectively assessed uterine bleeding. Safety was evaluated by adverse events. Forty-four cycling women experienced complete remission of uterine bleeding and none had persistence of endometrial hyperplasia during follow-up; four underwent hysterectomy. Atrophic endometrium was present in 24 menopausal women, one of whom underwent hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Endometrial resection was effective in achieving regression of endometrial hyperplasia and preventing its recurrence. (J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6(2):151-154, 1999)     

Reoperative hysteroscopic surgery in the management of patients who fail endometrial ablation and resection

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of reoperative hysteroscopic surgery for women who fail endometrial ablation and resection. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review and follow-up (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Private office practice. PATIENTS: Twenty-six women who had undergone endometrial ablation or resection and experienced failure characterized by intolerable pain, bleeding, or asymptomatic hematometra. INTERVENTION: Sonographically guided hysteroscopic endomyometrial resection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean length of time from initial treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding and reoperative hysteroscopic surgery was 41.2 +/- 47.9 months. Five (19.2%) women required simple dilatation and 21 (80.8%) required endocervical resection to achieve access to the uterine cavity. There were no operative complications. Mean operating time was 20.3 +/- 9.5 minutes. Mean specimen weight was 6.7 +/- 4.9 g. Adenomyosis was present in 15 (57.7%) specimens. Women were followed for a mean of 23.2 +/- 22.7 months. Twenty-three (88.5%) achieved satisfactory results and avoided hysterectomy. Three women (11.5%) eventually required hysterectomy because of recurrent pain or bleeding. CONCLUSION: Reoperative hysteroscopy is useful in managing women after failed endometrial ablation and resection. It produces excellent results in achieving amenorrhea and relief of cyclic pelvic pain, thereby avoiding hysterectomy in most patients.     

Histopathology and Clinical Outcomes of 151 Women with Postmenopausal Bleeding Treated with Resectoscopic Surgery

Study ObjectiveBecause postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) is associated with up to 10% of endometrial neoplasia and office endometrial sampling fails in approximately 10% and is inadequate in 30% of cases, the objective was to determine the role of hysteroscopic endometrial resection (HER) for the diagnosis and treatment of women with PMB.DesignA retrospective cohort.SettingA university-affiliated teaching hospital.PatientsOne hundred fifty-one women with PMB (September 1990–December 2010).InterventionHER in the operating room.Measurements and Main ResultsThe median (range) age and body mass index were 58 (50–87) years and 29 (21–52) kg/m², respectively. Office endometrial biopsy failed in 30 (19.8%), was inadequate in 20 (13.2%), identified nonatypical endometrial hyperplasia (NAH) in 21 (14%), atypical hyperplasia (AH) in 4 (2.6%), and endometrial cancer (EC) in 2 (1.3%) women. HER in 151 women identified 7 new cases of AH (3 from failed/inadequate office biopsy and 4 from NAH) and 9 EC (5 from failed/inadequate office biopsy, 1 from proliferative endometrium, 2 from NAH, and 1 from AH). All 27 women with NAH were treated by HER alone. Of 8 women with AH, 6 were treated with HER and 2 with hysterectomy; no residual endometrium was found in hysterectomy specimens. Of the 11 women with EC, 2 refused hysterectomy and are well 10 and 15 years after HER. Hysterectomy was performed for 9 of 11 EC cases, 2 of 8 AH cases, and 1 for abnormal uterine bleeding. Six women had repeat HER for persistent abnormal uterine bleeding, and 10 were lost to follow-up. At a median follow-up of 11.5 years (range, 7–20 years), 132 (12 hysterectomies + 10 lost) of 151 (87.4%) women were satisfied with no further bleeding.ConclusionIn women with PMB, hysteroscopic endometrial resection concomitantly with resection of intrauterine pathology by experienced surgeons is feasible, safe, and effective for diagnosis in all cases and treatment of the majority of intrauterine pathology including NAH and selected cases of AH and EC.     

Emergency endometrial resection in women with acute, severe uterine bleeding

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endometrial hysteroscopic resection in the treatment of severe uterine bleeding. DESIGN: Pilot feasibility study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Department of gynecology at a general hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-six women with severe uterine bleeding. INTERVENTION: Hysteroscopic transcervical endometrial resection under general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Bleeding had a benign organic cause in 25 women. One endometrial carcinoma was detected in endometrial chips in a postmenopausal woman and was managed with hysterectomy. Fifteen cycling women experienced complete remission of uterine bleeding; one underwent hysterectomy during follow-up. Atrophic endometrium was present in nine menopausal women during follow up. CONCLUSION: Endometrial transcervical resection was effective in controlling heavy bleeding, preventing future episodes of severe bleeding, and avoiding further medical or surgical treatment during 19 months of follow-up.     

Ten-year follow-up of endometrial ablation

BACKGROUND: This paper presents a ten-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial which gives the long-term hysterectomy rate and patient satisfaction rate of transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial ablation in the treatment of heavy dysfunctional bleeding. METHODS: There were 120 women enrolled in the study, from June 10, 1993 to August 31, 1995, all requiring endometrial ablation for the treatment of heavy dysfunctional bleeding. All patients were offered a clinical examination two years postoperatively. Long-term outcome was assessed by completion of a questionnaire five and ten years after initial treatment. Any new symptomatology and need for further treatment or a hysterectomy was registered. A bleeding index and the patients' satisfaction rate and acceptability of the treatment method were stated. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were treated by endometrial coagulation, and 59 by endometrial resection. No significant difference in the number of hysterectomies or satisfaction rate between the two groups was observed. At a ten-year follow-up, 63% of patients only had one ablation, 11% were treated twice, and 22% had a hysterectomy. Only 3% were lost to follow-up. For the group of patients above 40 years of age, only 17% had a hysterectomy. Since the two-year follow-up only six patients with one hysteroscopic treatment have had further intervention. Ninety-four percent of the women would recommend the treatment to their best female friend. CONCLUSION: The long-term results show that an ablation for heavy dysfunctional bleeding is an excellent treatment. Overall 22% of patients had a hysterectomy. If the patient had no further intervention at the two-year clinical control, there was only a 6% risk of hysterectomy after a period of at least ten years.     

Why Do Women Choose Endometrial Ablation Rather Than Hysterectomy?

Objective: To determine why women choose endometrial ablation rather than hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia.

Design: Observational study based on postal questionnaires.

Setting: A university hospital.

Patient(s): One hundred eighty randomly selected patients from a cohort of 658 patients who underwent endometrial ablation for the treatment of menorrhagia during the past 7 years.

Intervention(s): None.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Patient attitude about endometrial ablation.

Result(s): One hundred six questionnaires (58.9%) were completed satisfactorily. The average postoperative follow-up period was 45.1 months (range, 3–80 months). Eleven women (10.4%) had undergone repeated endometrial ablation and 8 (7.5%) had undergone hysterectomy. More than half the women indicated that they would find endometrial ablation acceptable even if there was no chance of amenorrhea, if the probability of menstruation becoming lighter was ≥4:10, if the likelihood of menstrual pain decreasing was ≥3:10, if the chance of requiring repeated endometrial ablation or hysterectomy was ≤1:4, and if the risk of uterine cancer after surgery was ≤1:200. The three most important advantages of endometrial ablation over hysterectomy were perceived to be the avoidance of major surgery, the fast return to normal functioning, and the short hospitalization.

Conclusion(s): Most women who choose endometrial ablation rather than hysterectomy as therapy for menorrhagia are prepared to undergo hysteroscopic surgery even if the chance of success is relatively poor.     

A randomized prospective study of the use of endometrial ablation for prevention of recurrent endometrial polyps in breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen

Objective: To assess the roles of endometrial ablation in prevention of recurrence of tamoxifen-associated endometrial polyps in breast cancer patients.Design: A randomized prospective study of tamoxifen-treated patients who underwent hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps with or without simultaneous resection of the endometrium.Materials and Methods: Twenty consecutive women (aged 43–61 years) undergoing hysteroscopic removal of tamoxifen-associated endometrial polyps were randomized via a computer-generated random table to undergo or not to undergo concomitant endometrial ablation. All patients had undergone endometrial sampling prior to the procedure. The patients were followed for at least 18 months (range 18–24 months). The follow-up included transvaginal ultrasonography every 6 months and hysteroscopy when endometrial irregularity was noted. The main outcome variable was recurrence of endometrial polyps while the occurrence of uterine bleeding was noted.Results: In the 10 study group women, who underwent endometrial ablation, only 1 patient had a 1 × 1 cm endometrial polyp diagnosed and removed during the follow-up period. Seven of the study women remained amenorrheic, and 3 experienced spotting a few days every month. In the control group, a recurrent endometrial polyp, necessitating hysteroscopic removal, was diagnosed postoperatively in 6 women (two-tailed Fisher’s Exact test; P < .06).Conclusion: Recurrence of endometrial polyps, one of the most common problems in breast cancer patients receiving long-term treatment with tamoxifen, can be significantly reduced by performing endometrial ablation at the time of hysteroscopic removal of the polyp. The possible risk of occult endometrial cancer is yet to be determined.     

Five-year follow-up of endometrial ablation: endometrial coagulation versus endometrial resection

OBJECTIVE: A randomized, controlled trial was performed to compare the patient complication rate, effectiveness, and satisfaction rate of transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial coagulation versus endometrial resection in the treatment for heavy dysfunctional bleeding. METHODS: One hundred and twenty women requiring endometrial ablation for the treatment of heavy bleeding disorders entered the study. All patients were offered a clinical examination 24 months postoperatively and had a questionnaire by mail 5 years after the initial treatment. The number of complications during and after the operation, re-ablations, and hysterectomies were registered. A bleeding index and the patient satisfaction rate were stated. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were treated by endometrial coagulation, and 59 were treated by endometrial resection. No differences between the two groups were observed concerning fluid absorption, bleeding, perforation, and infection. At the 5-year follow-up, 64% of the patients had only one ablation, 15% were treated twice, 15% had a hysterectomy, and 6% were lost to follow-up. After 5 years, the bleeding index was halved in patients with menses. Seventy-nine percent of the women would recommend the treatment to their best female friend. CONCLUSION: We found no significant differences in the frequency of complications. Only 15% of the women had a hysterectomy after 5 years. No significant difference was observed with respect to bleeding reduction and patient satisfaction in the two groups.     

Recurrence of endometrial adenocarcinoma in a prior Bartholin's cyst marsupialization incision

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer recurrences in surgical incisions are rare and thought to be due to seeding of the area with microscopic disease at the time of original surgery. CASE: A 53-year-old woman underwent a dual procedure of a marsupialization of a benign bartholin's cyst with a hysteroscopic dilation and curettage for postmenopausal bleeding and received the diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Final pathology from subsequent hysterectomy and staging procedure demonstrated a surgical Stage IB Grade 1 endometrial cancer. An isolated recurrence of disease in her marsupialization scar was discovered 10 months after her staging procedure. CONCLUSION: This case represents the only described endometrial cancer recurrence in a Bartholin's gland which was contaminated at the time of the original hysteroscopy and dilation and curettage.