Mini-Gastric Bypass by Mini-Laparotomy: A Cost-Effective Alternative in the Laparoscopic Era

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (MGB) is being increasingly performed worldwide. Results of MGB by mini-laparotomy (minilap MGB) are hereby reported. METHODS: 126 patients undergoing minilap MGB from October 2004 to October 2006, were reviewed at an academic institution. RESULTS: Mean age was 35 +/- 11.4 years (range 15-72), preoperative BMI was 44 +/- 6.9 kg/m2 (range 35-61.8) and 80 (63.4%) were women. Co-morbidities were present in 42 (33.3%). Operative time was 144 +/- 15.8 minutes (range 120-160) and length of hospital stay was 3.32 +/- 0.62 days (range 2-18). There was no hospital mortality, and the in-hospital complication rate was 4.7%. No anastomotic leakage occurred, and the incidence of wound sepsis was 2.3%. The mean total cost of the procedure was 3408 +/- 547 USD (range 2967-6876). Five patients (3.9%) developed incisional hernias and 3 (2.3%) marginal ulcers. BMI at 6 months was 33.0 +/- 3.1 kg/m2 (range 26.8-43.5, P < 0.001) compared with preoperative value. At 1 year, mean excess weight loss was 68.4% and comorbidities resolved in 85%. CONCLUSION: Minilap MGB is a simple, safe, effective and low-cost gastric bypass. It represents an attractive cost-effective alternative to laparoscopic MGB.     

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass versus Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding in the Super-obese: A Comparative Study of 290 Patients

Background: Controversy exists regarding the best surgical treatment for super-obesity (BMI >50 kg/m 2 ). The two most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide are laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). We undertook a retrospective single-center study to compare the safety and efficacy of these two operations in super-obese patients. Methods: 290 super-obese patients underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery: 179 LAGB and 111 LRYGBP. Results: There were one death in both groups. The early complication rate was higher in the LAGB group (10% vs 2.8%, P<0.01). Late complication rate was higher in the LAGB group (26% vs 15.3%, P<0.05). Operating time and hospital stay were significantly higher in the LRYGBP group. LRYGBP had significantly better excess weight loss than LAGB (63% vs 41% at 1 year, and 73% vs 46% at 2 years), as well as lower BMI than LAGB (35 vs 41 at 18 months). Conclusion: LRYGBP results in significantly greater weight loss than LAGB in super-obese patients, but is associated with a higher early complication rate.     

Primary Results of Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass in a French Obesity-Surgery Specialized University Hospital

BACKGROUND: Since 2002, we have performed 350 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (LRYGB). We decided to evaluate the laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB), an operation reported as effective, yet simpler than LRYGB. It consisted of a long lesser curvature tube with a terminolateral gastroenterostomy, 200 cm distal to the Treitz ligament. METHODS: From October 2006 to November 2007, 100 patients (23 men and 77 women) underwent LMGB. The mean age was 40.9 +/- 11.5 years (17.5-62.4), the preoperative mean body weight was 131 +/- 23.1 kg (82-203) and the mean BMI was 46.9 +/- 7.4 kg/m(2) (32.8-72.4). Twenty-four patients had prior restrictive procedure: 20 LAGB of which nine were already removed and four VBG (two laparoscopic and two by open surgery). In preoperative gastric endoscopy Helicobacter pylorii was present in 26 patients and eradicated. RESULTS: All procedures were completed laparoscopically by six different surgeons. Mean operative time was 129 +/- 37 min. There was no death. Seven patients (7%) presented major early complications: three reoperations for incarcerated herniation of small bowel in the trocar wound, one peritonitis due to a traumatic injury of the biliary limb, one perianastomotic abscess, one intraabdominal bleeding requiring splenectomy, and one endoscopic haemostasis for anastomotic bleeding. One patient presented anastomotic stenosis that required endoscopic dilatation 2 months postoperatively. Mean BMI at 3 months was 38.7 kg/m(2) (31.2-60.9) and at 6 months 35.1 (23.6-53.0). Nine patients complained of diarrhea that resolved 3 months postoperatively and, significantly, only two patients complained of biliary reflux. CONCLUSION: Pending long-term evaluation, LMBG seems a good alternative to LRYGB, giving the same results with a more simple and reproductible technique.     

Laparoscopic Conversion of Laparoscopic Gastric Banding to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Review of 70 Patients

Background: The feasibility and outcomes of conversion of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) was evaluated. Methods: From November 2000 to March 2004, all patients who underwent laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to LRYGBP were retrospectively analyzed. The procedure included adhesiolysis, resection of the previous band, creation of an isolated gastric pouch, 100-cm Roux-limb, side-to-side jejuno-jejunostomy, and end-to-end gastro-jejunostomy. Results: 70 patients (58 female, mean age 41) with a median BMI of 45±11 (27-81) underwent attempted laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to an RYGBP. Indications for conversion were insufficient weight loss or weight regain after band deflation for gastric pouch dilatation in 34 patients (49%), inadequate weight loss in 17 patients (25%), symptomatic proximal gastric pouch dilatation in 15 patients (20%), intragastric band migration in 3 patients (5%), and psychological band intolerance in 1 patient. 3 of 70 patients (4.3%) had to be converted to a laparotomy because of severe adhesions. Mean operative time was 240±40 SD min (210-280). Mean hospital length of stay was 7.2 days. Early complication rate was 14.3% (10/70). Late major complications occurred in 6 patients (8.6%). There was no mortality. Median excess body weight loss was 70±20%. 60% of patients achieved a BMI of <33 with mean follow-up 18 months. Conclusion: Laparoscopic conversion of LAGB to RYGBP is a technically challenging procedure that can be safely integrated into a bariatric treatment program with good results. Short-term weight loss is very good.     

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as Treatment for Morbid Obesity: Technique and Short-Term Outcome

Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are the most commonly performed surgical procedures for weight reduction in the United States. Currently, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is being explored. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and short-term efficacy of LSG as a treatment option for weight reduction. Methods: Data of all patients who underwent LSG for treatment of morbid obesity between November 2004 and March 2006 and completed the 3- and 6-month follow-up visits at the time of the study, were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included demographics, operative time, length of stay, postoperative complications, and degree of weight reduction. Results: Of the 62 patients who underwent LSG performed by two surgeons, the data of 30 patients (7 males and 23 females) were further analyzed. Mean preoperative BMI was 41.4 (33-59) kg/m². Mean operative time was 80 min (range 65-130). Mean hospital stay was 3.2 days (range 2 to 25). Mean weight loss at 3 and 6 months following the procedure was 22.7 kg and 30.5 kg respectively, and mean % excess weight loss (EWL) was 40.7 and 52.8, respectively. Three patients were considered to have mild complications, and one patient had a major complication that necessitated surgical intervention. There was no mortality. Conclusions: In the short-term, LSG is a safe and effective treatment option.     

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: Results of our Learning Curve in 100 Consecutive Patients

Background: Morbid obesity requires life-long treatment, and bariatric surgery provides the best results. Among the bariatric procedures, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) has been considered to be superior. However, it requires advanced laparoscopic skills and a learning curve. We analyzed our results in an initial series of 100 patients. Methods: Data of 100 consecutive patients who underwent LRYGBP for morbid obesity in a 2.5-year period were prospectively collected and analyzed with emphasis on results and complications. Results: Mean age was 31±5 years. There were 63 woman and 37 men. Preoperative BMI was 50±9 kg/m². 33 patients were considered super-obese (BMI>50). Mean operative time was 3.8 ± 0.7 hours. Two patients required conversion to open surgery. Mean hospital stay was 6 days. Complications occurred in 10 patients. Mortality rate was 2%. Excess body weight loss was as follows: 33 ± 8% at 3 months (n=92), 47 ± 2% at 6 months (n=82), 62 ± 4% at 1 year (n= 70), 66 ± 5% at 18 months (n= 63) and 67 ± 8% at 2 years (n= 35). There was significant improvement in several co-morbid conditions, such as diabetes and hypertension. Conclusion: LRYGBP is a reproducible technique. It requires the combination of bariatric and laparoscopic expertise.     

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass is Safe and Effective in Patients with a BMI ≥60

Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) has been shown to be safe and effective. There is little data on the outcomes in massively super-obese patients, with a body mass index (BMI) &ge60 kg/m²(super-super-obese). The goal of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of LRYGBP in these patients, and compare these results to patients with a BMI <60. Methods: 213 consecutive patients undergoing LRYGBP by a single surgeon at a university hospital were included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: BMI <60 kg/m²(n=167) and BMI ≥60 kg/m² (n=46). The 2 groups were compared with regard to perioperative complications, and postoperative weight loss. Results: Both groups had statistically similar complication rates. There were major complications in 8 patients (5%) in the lower BMI group and in 3 patients (7%) in the higher BMI group. There were minor complications in 9 patients (5%) in the lower BMI group and in 4 patients (9%) in the higher BMI group. Mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was 64% at 1 year in the BMI <60 group and 53% in the BMI ≥60 group. Conclusion: LRYGBP can be performed safely and effectively in super-super-obese patients (BMI ≥60). Although these patients have less %EWL than lighter patients, they still end up with a good result. Therefore, LRYGBP should be considered a good surgical option even for patients with a BMI ≥60.     

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: minimally invasive bariatric surgery for the superobese in the community hospital setting

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) operation has become a popular choice for weight-reduction surgery. We report an outcome analysis of our early results with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for superobese (BMI >50) patients. Between January 2000 and October 2001, we operated on 71 superobese patients. The mean body mass index (BMI) of patients at time of surgery was 57 kg/m2. The prospectively collected data included patient demographics, comorbidities, operative times, postoperative weight loss, and complications. Conversion to open gastric bypass was required in one patient. The overall complication rate was 10 per cent. Preoperative comorbidities were resolved or improved in 93 per cent of patients at 1-year postoperative. Average operative time and length of hospital stay were 196 minutes and 2.3 days, respectively. Mean percentage excess weight loss at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months was 27 per cent, 39 per cent, 49 per cent, and 55 per cent, respectively. Mean BMI decreased to 36 kg/m2 over a 12-month period. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for superobese patients as performed in the community hospital setting can be both safe and effective with respect to overall postoperative course, early weight loss, and reduction of comorbidity.     

Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass is a Safe and Effective Operation for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity in Patients Older than 55 Years

Background: Bariatric surgery in patients >50 years has been controversial. We investigated the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) in patients >55 years of age. Methods: Prospective data on 71 patients (54 females and 17 males) undergoing LRYGBP were reviewed. The patients were followed for a mean of 17 months (range 2-35 months). Results: The mean age was 59 years (range 55-67 years), and the mean preoperative BMI was 50.2 kg/m² (range 37-65 kg/m²). There were no conversions to open technique. Mean percent of excess weight loss (%EWL) was 20%, 48%, 64% and 67% at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. 89% of patients had at least a 50% EWL at 1 year postoperatively. There was a significant decrease in the number of patients requiring medical treatment for co-morbidities associated with morbid obesity: diabetes mellitus 87%, hypertension 70% and sleep apnea 86%. There was no inpatient mortality. 1 patient died suddenly 2 weeks postoperatively of possible myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolism. 16 patients developed 22 complications. The median length of hospital stay was 3 days. Conclusion: LRYGBP is a safe and well-tolerated surgical option for the treatment of morbid obesity in patients >55 years old. These patients demonstrate a satisfactory weight loss and resolution of co-morbidities.     

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass beyond Age 60

Background: Previous reports have questioned the safety and efficacy of gastric bypass in older patients. We examine our results in the older group of patients to shed some light on the appropriateness of offering gastric bypass to senior patients. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database on all laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) cases performed from March 2001 to October 2003 was conducted. Patients >60 years of age were compared to the overall group. Results: A total of 550 patients underwent LRYGBP: all were completed laparoscopically. In the 527 patients <60 years of age, there were no deaths and there were 15 complications (2.8% perioperative morbidity). In the group of patients >60 years old, there were 23 patients; mean age was 64.4 years (60-75 years). There was 1 death in this group (4.3% mortality rate) and 1 postoperative complication (4.3% morbidity rate). In the >60 year group at an average of 12 months follow-up, weight loss was 43.2 kg (28.6-73.2 kg), change in BMI was 16.5 (11-23), and excess weight loss was 65% (40-110%). Also, diabetes resolved in 3 out of 4 patients (75%), obstructive sleep apnea in 2 of 3 (67%), hypercholesterolemia in 3 of 5 (60%) and hypertension resolved or improved in 10 of 11 patients (91%). Conclusion: While patients >60 years of age had a higher morbidity and mortality, their risk/benefit ratio was acceptable. Older patients achieve significant weight loss and resolution of obesity-associated comorbidities.     

Bowel Obstruction after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: Bowel obstruction has been frequently reported after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). The aim of this study was to review our experience with bowel obstruction following LRYGBP, specifically examining its etiology and management and to strategize maneuvers to minimize this complication. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 9 patients who developed postoperative bowel obstruction after LRYGBP. Each chart was reviewed for demographics, timing of bowel obstruction from the primary operation, etiology of obstruction, and management. Results: 9 of our initial 225 patients (4%) who underwent LRYGBP developed postoperative bowel obstruction. The mean age was 46 ± 12 years, with mean BMI 47 ± 9 kg/m². 6 patients developed early bowel obstruction, and 3 patients developed late bowel obstruction. The mean time interval for development of early bowel obstruction was 16 ±16 days. The causes for early bowel obstruction included narrowing of the jejunojenunostomy anastomosis (n=3), angulation of the Roux limb (n=2), and obstruction of the Roux limb at the level of the transverse mesocolon (n=1). The mean time interval for development of late bowel obstruction was 7.4 ± 0.5 months. The causes for late bowel obstruction included internal herniation (n=2) and adhesions (n=1). 6 of 9 bowel obstructions (66%) were considered technically related to the learning curve of the laparoscopic approach. Eight of the 9 patients required operative intervention, and 6 of the 8 reoperations were managed laparoscopically. Management included laparoscopic bypass of the jejunojejunostomy obstruction site (n=5), open reduction of internal hernia (n=2), and laparoscopic lysis of adhesion (n=1). Conclusions: Bowel obstruction is a frequent complication after LRYGBP, particularly during the learn ing curve of the laparoscopic approach. Specific measures should be instituted to minimize bowel obstruction after LRYGBP as most of these complications are considered technically preventable.     

Outcome after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding – 8 Years Experience

Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has been our choice operation for morbid obesity since 1994. Despite a long list of publications about the LAGB during recent years, the evidence with regard to long-term weight loss after LAGB has been rather sparse. The outcome of the first 100 patients and the total number of 984 LAGB procedures were evaluated. Methods: 984 consecutive patients (82.5% female) underwent LAGB. Initial body weight was 132.2 ± 23.9 SD kg and body mass index (BMI) was 46.8 ± 7.2 kg/m². Mean age was 37.9 (18-65). Retrogastric placement was performed in 577 patients up to June 1998. Thereafter, the pars flaccida to perigastric (two-step technique) was used in the following 407 patients. Results: Mortality and conversion rates were 0. Follow-up of the first 100 patients has been 97% and ranges in the following years between 95% and 100% (mean 97.2%). Median follow-up of the first 100 patients who were available for follow-up was 98.9 months (8.24 years). Median follow-up of all patients was 55.5 months (range 99-1). Early complications were 1 gastric perforation after previous hiatal surgery and 1 gastric slippage (band was removed). All complications were seen during the first 100 procedures. Late complications of the first 100 cases included 17 slippages requiring reinterventions during the following years; total rate of slippage decreased later to 3.7%. Mean excess weight loss was 59.3% after 8 years, if patients with band loss are excluded. BMI dropped from 46.8 to 32.3 kg/m². 5 patients of the first 100 LAGB had the band removed, followed by weight gain; 3 of the 5 patients underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) with successful weight loss after the redo-surgery. 14 patients were switched to a "banded" LRYGBP and 2 patients to a LRYGBP during 2001-2002. The quality of life indices were still improved in 82% of the first 100 patients. The percentages of good and excellent results were at the highest level at 2 years after LAGB (92%). Conclusions: LAGB is safe, with a lower complication rate than other bariatric operations. Reoperations can be performed laparoscopically with low morbidity and short hospitalizations. The LAGB seems to be the basic bariatric procedure, which can be switched laparoscopically to combined bariatric procedures if treatment fails. After the learning curve of the surgeon, results are markedly improved. On the basis of 8 years long-term follow-up, it is an effective procedure.     

Psoriasis Remission after Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease characterized by epithelial hyperplasia and an accelerated rate of epithelial turnover affecting approximately 1-3% of the population. Exogenous and endogenous factors including morbid obesity can increase the morbidity of psoriasis. Case Report: A 55-year-old male, who weighed 131 kg with BMI 41 kg/m², underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). He had a 15-year duration of severe psoriasis and was being medically treated. At 12 months after LRYGBP, he had lost 39 kg (68% EWL), and had complete resolution of the psoriasis and had discontinued all preoperative medications related to the disease. At 2 years after LRYGBP, psoriasis has not recurred. Conclusion: Weight loss after LRYGBP should be considered as a strategy in the treatment of severe psoriasis in morbidly obese patients.     

腹腔镜手术治疗219例肥胖症疗效分析

目的探讨腹腔镜下胃肠外科手术治疗单纯性肥胖症及其合并2型糖尿病（T2DM）患者的效果及安全性。方法上海第二军医大学附属长海医院微创外科2003年6月至2010年6月间对219例肥胖症患者进行了腹腔镜下胃肠外科手术,其中201例行腹腔镜下可调节胃绑带术（LAGB组）,13例行腹腔镜下改良简易型胃肠短路术（LMGB组）,5例行腹腔镜下管状胃胃切除术（LSG组）。总结分析该组患者的临床和随访资料。结果LAGB组患者体质量指数（BMI）平均37．9kg／m2,术后6个月及12个月BMI分别为平均32．4kg／mz和29．7kg／m2;43例术前合并T2DM者．11例（25．6％）术后临床部分缓解,16例（37．2％）完全缓解;有26例（12．9％）术后出现并发症。LMGB组患者BMI平均34．7kg／m2,术后6个月及12个月BMl分别为平均31．6kg／m2和26．9kg／m2：10例术前合并T2DM者,2例（20．0％）术后临床部分缓解,7例（70．0％）完全缓解;有2例（15．4％）术后出现并发症。LSG组患者BMI平均43．8kg／m2．术后6个月及12个月BMl分别为平均38．1kg／m2和34．3kg／m2;3例术前合并T2DM者,术后1例达到临床部分缓解,1例完全缓解：有1例术后出现并发症。所有术式组均无围手术期死亡。结论腹腔镜下胃肠外科手术对单纯性肥胖症有效．并能使合并的T2DM得到缓解．同时手术并发症较少。     

Ala55Val Polymorphism on UCP2 Gene Predicts Greater Weight Loss in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Gastric Banding

BACKGROUND: Variability in weight loss has been observed from morbidly obese patients receiving bariatric operations. Genetic effects may play a crucial role in this variability. METHODS: 304 morbidly obese patients (BMI > or =39) were recruited, 77 receiving laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and 227 laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB), and 304 matched non-obese controls (BMI < or =24). Initially, all subjects were genotyped for 4 SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) on UCP2 gene in a case-control study. The SNPs significantly associated with morbid obesity (P < 0.05) were considered as candidate markers affecting weight change. Subsequently, effects on predicting weight loss of those candidate markers were explored in LAGB and LMGB, respectively. The peri-operative parameters were also compared between LAGB and LMGB. RESULTS: The rs660339 (Ala55Val), on exon 4, was associated with morbid obesity (P = 0.049). Morbidly obese patients with either TT or CT genotypes on rs660339 experienced greater weight loss compared to patients with CC after LAGB at 12 months (BMI loss 12.2 units vs 8.1 units) and 24 months (BMI loss 13.1 units vs 9.3 units). However, this phenomenon was not observed in patients after LMGB. Although greater weight loss was observed in patients receiving LMGB, this procedure had a higher operative complication rate than LAGB (7.5% vs. 2.8%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ala55Val may play a crucial role in obesity development and weight loss after LAGB. It may be considered as clinicians incorporate genetic susceptibility testing into weight loss prediction prior to bariatric operations.     

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Vs. Mini-gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity: a 10-Year Experience

Background

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of morbid obesity but is technically challenging and results in significant perioperative complications. While laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) has been reported to be a simple and effective treatment for morbid obesity, controversy exists. Long-term follow-up data from a large number of patients comparing LMGB to LRYGB are lacking.

Methods

Between October 2001 and September 2010, 1,657 patients who received gastric bypass surgery (1,163 for LMGB and 494 for LRYGB) for their morbid obesity were recruited from our comprehensive obesity surgery center. Patients who received revision surgeries were excluded. Minimum follow-up was 1?year (mean 5.6?years, from 1 to 10?years). The operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and operative complications were assessed. Late complication, changes in body weight loss, BMI, quality of life, and comorbidities were determined at follow-up. Changes in quality of life were assessed using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index.

Results

There was no difference in preoperative clinical parameters between the two groups. Surgical time was significantly longer for LRYGB (159.2 vs. 115.3?min for LMGB, p?<?0.001). The major complication rate was borderline higher for LRYGB (3.2 vs. 1.8?%, p?=?0.07). At 5?years after surgery, the mean BMI was lower in LMGB than LRYGB (27.7 vs. 29.2, p?<?0.05) and LMGB also had a higher excess weight loss than LRYGB (72.9 vs. 60.1?%, p?<?0.05). Postoperative gastrointestinal quality of life increased significantly after operation in both groups without any significant difference at 5?years. Obesity-related clinical parameters improved in both groups without significant difference, but LMGB had a lower hemoglobin level than LRYGB. Late revision rate was similar between LRYGB and LMGB (3.6 vs. 2.8?%, p?=?0.385).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that LMGBP can be regarded as a simpler and safer alternative to LRYGB with similar efficacy at a 10-year experience.     

Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass for Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty

Background: Bariatric surgery is the only method for sustained weight loss in morbid obesity. However, 10-25% of patients will require re-operation for unsatisfactory weight loss or weight regain after restrictive surgery. Re-operation is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. This study is to evaluate the s a fety and efficacy of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) for failed vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). Methods: From May 2001 to March 2003, 29 consecutive patients underwent LMGB for failed VBG. Average age was 39.7 years (range 22 to 56), and average BMI before re-operation was 41.7 kg/m² (range 35.0-70.8). 8 patients had previous open VBG, and 21 had laparoscopic VBG. The re-operation was for regain of weight in 16 patients, inadequate weight loss in 10 patients, and severe reflux esophagitis in 3 patients. Re-operation was performed after an average of 58.5 months (range 14 to 180). Results: All the re-operations were completed laparoscopically. Average operative time was 171.4 minutes (range 130 to 290). There was 1 mortality, due to leakage (3.4%). 1 re-operation was necessary, for incarceration of small bowel in a trocar wound 10 days after the LMGB (3.4%). 1 anastomotic site bleeding and 1 wound infection occurred. Average BMI 12 months after the LMGB was 32.1 kg/m² (range 26.4 to 42.7). The quality of life study was significantly improved. The revision operation had much more technical difficulty for those with previous open VBG than laparoscopic VBG. Conclusion: LMGB is an effective and safe revision operation for patients with failed VBG. A large series and long-term follow up is needed for confirmation.     

Intragastric Balloon for Preoperative Weight Reduction in Candidates for Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass with Massive Obesity

Background: Laparoscopic bariatric operations can be technically challenging in massively obese patients. The potential of the intragastric balloon for preoperative weight reduction was evaluated in candidates for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) with super obesity. Methods: From January 2004 to March 2005, 10 patients with super obesity who were potential candidates for LRYGBP were included in a prospective observational study. An intragastric balloon was placed endoscopically under general anesthesia. Patients were then followed by a multidisciplinary team until removal of the balloon after 6 months. Weight, BMI, and percent excess weight lost (%EWL) were monitored after 1, 3 and 6 months. Results: The 10 patients were all female with mean ± SD age of 33±11 years (range 17-51). Initial weight was 175±25 kg (range 135-223) and initial BMI was 64±7 kg/m² (range 59-78). After completion of 1, 3 and 6 months, weight, BMI, and %EWL reached respectively: 166±27 kg*, 165±27 kg*, and 169±26 kg*; 61.1±7.6 kg/m²*, 60.8±8.4 kg/m²*, and 61±8.2 kg/m²*; 9±5%, 10±7%, 7±6%. (*=P<0.01 vs preop). Conclusion: In potential candidates for LRYGBP with super obesity, preoperative placement of an intragastric balloon can reduce the excess weight by 10% within 3 months. Extending this period failed to improve these results further.     

Laparoscopic Gastric Re-Banding versus Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass as a Rescue Operation for Patients with Pouch dilatation

Background:The authors assessed whether laparoscopic rebanding or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is the best approach for failed gastric banding after pouch dilatation. Methods: Between January 2000 and June 2005, 489 patients underwent laparoscopic gastric banding, and of these, 33 (6.7%) required rescue procedures for pouch dilatation. Each reoperated patient was contacted to obtain information about their postoperative course. Additionally, preoperative weight and BMI, weight loss at 1 year postoperatively, weight at time of pouch dilatation and the time-period between the primary operation and pouch dilatation were analyzed. Results: The most common operation for pouch dilatation was band repositioning or rebanding (16 patients). Band removal without replacement was performed in 7 patients. 8 patients underwent conversion to a LRYGBP. 1 patient underwent laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection and 1 patient received an intragastric balloon. Patients who underwent conversion to LRYGBP are very content and, although weight loss has been nearly the same as after gastric banding, they would prefer the gastric bypass operation to the gastric banding. Conclusion: Conversion to LRYGBP appears to offer significant advantages, and appears to be the rescue therapy of choice after failed laparoscopic gastric banding.     

Effectiveness of the Transoral Endoscopic Vertical Gastroplasty (TOGa?): a Good Balance Between Weight Loss and Complications, if Compared with Gastric Bypass and Biliopancreatic Diversion

Background

The effectiveness of restrictive procedures has been inferior to that of malabsorbitive ones. Recent variants of restrictive procedures, i.e., gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy, confirm the strive for more efficacious solutions with less complications. We investigated the balance between effectiveness and complications for a new restrictive procedure, a Transoral Endoscopic Vertical Gastroplasty (TOGa?)

Methods

Seventy-nine morbidly obese patients were submitted to one out of three surgical procedures: TOGa? (29 patients), laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGBP; 20 patients), and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD; 30 patients). Mean BMI were 41.7 (35.4?C46.6), 44.8 (36.4?C54), and 47.5 (41?C60.3), respectively. All the patients reached a 2-year follow-up.

Results

In TOGa? group BMI, respectively at 12 and 24?months, was 34.5 and 35.5, with 44 and 48.3?% of patients with BMI lower than 35. In LRYGBP group, BMI was 30.7 and 29.2?kg/m², with 80 and 85?% of patients with BMI?<?35. In BPD group, BMI was 30 and 29.6?kg/m², with 100 and 93.3?% of patients with BMI?<?35. In TOGa? group, 59?% of patients with an initial BMI?<?45 reached a BMI?<?35, in comparison to 48?% recorded in the whole group and to 14.3?% in patients with initial BMI????45.

Conclusions

In selected patients, TOGa?, was associated with good results after two years in terms of weight loss, even in comparison with LRYGBP and BPD. Minimal trauma, absence of complications, and short hospital stay justify this procedure for patients with low BMI.