Should airguns be banned?

In this article, we express concerns regarding the availability of airguns, the injuries that they cause and their abuse as weapons of assault. We wish to stimulate debate on this topic and report a 5-year retrospective analysis of all airgun injuries to the head and neck, presenting to Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, from June 1998 to June 2003. We identified 16 patients who suffered such injuries with ages ranging from 5 to 15 years. The majority of cases were violent assaults, which is not in accordance with previous published reports. All of these occurred in public places outside the home. Most incidents occurred through the spring and summer period. Six patients required overnight stay in hospital. Nine patients required operative procedures to remove the airgun pellets. Two patients had serious eye injuries resulting in loss of vision. Two patients had penetrating neck injuries requiring exploration of the wound. The remaining group had either skin-penetrating injuries with lodgement of fragments in subcutaneous tissues or non-skin penetrating injuries. This study highlights serious injuries arising from the abuse of airguns as weapons of assault. Airguns are readily available to people without license. Recent legislation has increased the minimum age at which airguns can be carried in a public place, but we believe that stricter legislation is required to produce a reduction in the number of airgun-related injuries.     

Should aminoglycoside antibiotics be abandoned?

BACKGROUND: Aminoglycosides can cause nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Alternatives are available. METHODS: Surgical service antibiotic use, aminoglycoside toxicity, and perioperative culture/sensitivity results from July 1998 to June 1999 were reviewed. RESULTS: Of 289 positive cultures in 243 patients, 92 cultures (32%) grew 151 Gram-negative rods (GNRs). Aminoglycosides were used in 26 patients and 4 of 26 (15%) suffered nephrotoxicity. Of the 112 GNRs tested against ceftazidime, 111 (99%) were sensitive to it which was significantly better than amikacin (56 of 61, 92%, P = 0.038), gentamicin (116 of 134, 87%, P <0.001), and tobramycin (67 of 81, 83%, P <0.001). The proportion sensitive to cefuroxime (26 of 30, 87%) was equivalent to the proportions sensitive to gentamicin (87%, P = NS) and tobramycin (83%, P = NS). Of the 35 GNRs that were resistant to gentamicin and/or tobramycin, 15 (43%) were Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSION: Aminoglycosides produce a significant rate of nephrotoxicity. There are antibiotics with equal or better sensitivity profiles than aminoglycosides against GNRs and Pseudomonas. Aminoglycoside use is rarely, if ever, indicated.     

Should Dialysate Calcium be Individualized?

The growing interest in a personalized choice of dialysate calcium concentration faces some important unsolved questions. First, the desired aims to be achieved should be clarified, as different d‐Ca concentrations might differentially impact dialysis calcium balance and serum calcium concentration. A second point to be addressed is how to achieve the desired goals; the kinetics of calcium during dialysis treatment are complex. This is not an easy task and probably only an automatic device able to read serum calcium concentration in real‐time and adjust d‐Ca to it might supply an effective method for individualizing d‐Ca. Finally, it is not even clear whether individualizing d‐Ca is worth doing; cost‐effectiveness studies might give some further insights into this intricate issue.     

Should keratoacanthoma be treated surgically?

Keratoacanthoma is a rapidly growing cutaneous neoplasia of adult persons that may regress spontaneously. It is believed to arise from the hair follicles. It is sometimes difficult to distinguish keratoacantoma from squamous cell carcinoma either clinically or histologically. During ten years period (1992-2001) we were treating 18 patients with keratoacanthoma of the skin. We discuss here our experience with this tumor, and we conclude that early, complete excision is the treatment of choice for it.     

Should an infected Nuss bar be removed?

Background

The Nuss procedure is a minimally invasive procedure for correction of pectus excavatum. It involves insertion of a substernal metal bar. A feared complication of any implanted device is infection, which often necessitates removal. The purpose of this report is to describe the authors' experience with infectious complications after the Nuss procedure.

Methods

From February 2000 to July 2002, 102 patients underwent the Nuss procedure in 2 pediatric surgical centers. In a retrospective way, the files of those patients in whom a postoperative infection developed were studied.

Results

Seven patients suffered postoperative infectious complications. Only one bar needed to be removed.

Conclusion

The authors' experience indicates that there is no need for immediate removal of an infected Nuss bar. Most of these infections can be managed conservatively. However, early antibiotic treatment is warranted to ensure salvage of the bar.     

Should the internal thoracic artery be skeletonized?

Traditionally, the internal thoracic artery is harvested as a pedicle. In contemporary cardiac surgical practice, however, certain surgeons practice the internal thoracic artery-skeletonization technique. A systematic review of clinical studies reporting on the use of skeletonized internal thoracic arteries (SKT-ITA) has not yet been performed. The primary aim of this review article is to examine comprehensively the entire body of evidence regarding the use of SKT-ITA. In particular, we aimed to analyze the effects of skeletonization on sternal blood supply, wall damage and blood flow in the harvested vessel, postoperative graft patency, and clinical outcome. Advantages and disadvantages of the skeletonization technique are highlighted and discussed.