The utility of helicopter transport of trauma patients from the injury scene in an urban trauma system

BACKGROUND: Continuing controversy surrounding the value of scene helicopter evacuation of urban trauma victims led to the present study. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients brought to our trauma center from the injury scene by helicopter from 1990 to 2001. RESULTS: The study included 947 consecutive patients, 911 with blunt trauma and 36 with penetrating injuries. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 8.9. Fifteen patients died in the emergency department, 312 patients (33.5%) were discharged home from the emergency department (mean ISS, 2.7), and 620 patients were hospitalized (mean ISS, 11.4). Three hundred thirty-nine of the hospitalized patients (54.7%) had an ISS < or = 9; 148 patients had an ISS > or = 16. Eighty-four patients (8.9%) required early operation, mostly for open extremity fractures; only 17 patients (1.8%) underwent surgery for immediately life-threatening injuries. For 54.7% of the patients, the helicopter was judged to be clearly faster than would have been possible by ground transport. In 140 additional patients (14.8%) with prolonged scene time, the helicopter was probably faster than ground ambulance. Considering faster transport time and either the need for early operation or hospitalization with an ISS > or = 9 as advantageous, a maximum of 22.8% of the study population possibly benefited from helicopter transport. CONCLUSION: The helicopter is used excessively for scene transport of trauma victims in our metropolitan trauma system. New criteria should be developed for helicopter deployment in the urban trauma environment.     

Population-based prediction of trauma volumes at a Level 1 trauma centre

Objective: With an ageing US population, the demographics of traumatic injuries are being significantly altered. Census projections predict that the number of Americans over age 65 will double in the next 20 years. We used stochastic methods to forecast trauma admissions in order to predict the effects of such demographic changes at our trauma centre.

Methods: Age- and sex-related rates of traumatic admission were determined using population statistics and trauma registry data from 1994 to 1999. These rates were then projected from 2000 to 2025 based on both the Lee–Carter and random walk with drift methods. Stochastic population projections were made and paired with the projected trauma rates, allowing estimation of total trauma volume.

Results: Trauma rates were predicted to increase for most age groups. Trauma admissions are predicted to increase 57% by 2024. By 2019, 50% of trauma admissions will be 60 or older.

Conclusions: Our trauma volume is expected to increase 57% by 2024, an increase of 2% per year. More of this volume will consist of elderly patients, potentially requiring increased health-care resources.     

A review of cervical spine injury associated with maxillofacial trauma at a UK tertiary referral centre

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to determine the incidence and patterns of cervical spine injury (CSI) associated with maxillofacial fractures at a UK trauma centre.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of 714 maxillofacial fracture patients presenting to a single trauma centre between 2006 and 2012.ResultsOf the 714 maxillofacial fracture patients, 2.2% had associated CSI including a fracture, cord contusion or disc herniation. In comparison, 1.0% of patients without maxillofacial trauma sustained a CSI (odds ratio: 2.2, p=0.01). The majority (88%) of CSI cases of were caused by a road traffic accident (RTA) with the remainder due to falls. While 8.8% of RTA related maxillofacial trauma patients sustained a CSI, only 2.0% of fall related patients did (p=0.03, not significant). Most (70%) of the CSIs occurred at C1/C2 or C6/C7 levels. Overall, 455, 220 and 39 patients suffered non-mandibular, isolated mandibular and mixed mandibular/non-mandibular fractures respectively. Their respective incidences of CSI were 1.5%, 1.8% and 12.8% (p=0.005, significant). Twelve patients with concomitant CSI had their maxillofacial fractures treated within twenty-four hours and all were treated within four days.ConclusionsThe presence of maxillofacial trauma mandates exclusion and prompt management of cervical spine injury, particularly in RTA and trauma cases involving combined facial fracture patterns. This approach will facilitate management of maxillofacial fractures within an optimum time period.     

The changing epidemiology of spinal trauma: a 13-year review from a Level I trauma centre

IntroductionSpinal injuries secondary to trauma are a major cause of patient morbidity and a source of significant health care expenditure. Increases in traffic safety standards and improved health care resources may have changed the characteristics and incidence of spinal injury. The purpose of this study was to review a single metropolitan Level I trauma centre's experience to assess the changing characteristics and incidence of traumatic spinal injuries and spinal cord injuries (SCI) over a 13-year period.Patients and methodsA retrospective review of patients admitted to a Level I trauma centre between 1996 and 2008 was performed. Patients with spinal fractures and SCI were identified. Demographics, mechanism of injury, level of spinal injury and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were extracted. The outcomes assessed were the incidence rate of SCI and in-hospital mortality.ResultsOver the 13-year period, 5.8% of all trauma patients suffered spinal fractures, with 21.7% of patients with spinal injuries having SCI. Motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) were responsible for the majority of spinal injuries (32.6%). The mortality rate due to spinal injury decreased significantly over the study period despite a constant mean ISS. The incidence rate of SCI also decreased over the years, which was paralleled by a significant reduction in MVA associated SCI (from 23.5% in 1996 to 14.3% in 2001 to 6.7% in 2008). With increasing age there was an increase in spinal injuries; frequency of blunt SCI; and injuries at multiple spinal levels.ConclusionThis study demonstrated a reduction in mortality attributable to spinal injury. There has been a marked reduction in SCI due to MVAs, which may be related to improvements in motor vehicle safety and traffic regulations. The elderly population was more likely to suffer SCI, especially by blunt injury, and at multiple levels. Underlying reasons may be anatomical, physiological or mechanism related.     

Management of pancreatic injuries during damage control surgery: an observational outcomes analysis of 79 patients treated at an academic Level 1 trauma centre

Background

This study evaluated factors influencing mortality in a large cohort of patients who sustained pancreatic injuries and underwent DCS.

Methods

A prospective database of consecutive patients with pancreatic injuries treated at a Level 1 academic trauma centre was reviewed to identify those who underwent DCS between 1995 and 2014.

Results

Seventy-nine (71 men, median age: 26 years, range 16–73 years, gunshot wounds = 62, blunt = 14, stab = 3) patients with pancreatic injuries (35 proximal, 44 distal) had DCS. Fifty-nine (74.7 %) patients had AAST grade 3, 4 or 5 pancreatic injuries. The 79 patients had a total of 327 associated injuries (mean: 3 per patient, range 0–6) and underwent a total of 187 (range 1–7) operations. Vascular injuries (60/327, 18.3 %) occurred in 41 patients. Twenty-seven (34.2 %) patients died without having a second operation. The remaining 52 patients had two or more laparotomies (range 2–7). Overall 28 (35 %) patients underwent a pancreatic resection either during DCS (n = 18) or subsequently as a secondary procedure (n = 10) including a Whipple (n = 6) when stable. Overall 43 (54.4 %) patients died. Mortality was related to associated vascular injuries overall (p < 0.01), major visceral venous injuries (p < 0.01) and combined vascular and total number of associated organs injured (p < 0.04).

Conclusions

Despite the magnitude of their combined injuries and the degree of physiological insult, DCS salvaged 45 % of critically injured patients who later underwent definitive pancreatic surgery. Mortality correlated with associated vascular injuries overall, major visceral venous injuries and the combination of vascular plus the total number of associated organs injured.

     

Surgical interventions in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: Retrospective analysis of 74 patients treated at a tertiary level care centre

Background Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is a serious threat to tuberculosis control world wide with ominous implications in Indian context. The medical treatment of this disease is expensive, toxic and, most unfortunately, far from satisfactory. In carefully selected cases adjuvant surgery plays very significant role in achieving bacteriological cure. Methods Retrospective analysis was done in 74 cases of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, in whom some surgical interventions were carried out at L.R.S. Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases New Delhi between the years 1999 to 2003. There were 52 male and 22 female patients in the age group of 24 to 40 years. All were sputum positive at the time of surgery. Majority of patients were treated with pulmonary resections (Pneumonectomy [n=37], Bilobectomy [n=09] and Lobectomy [n=21]) while Primary Thoracoplasty with Apicolysis was planned in 7 patients. Post operatively 2^nd line anti tubercular chemotherapy was prescribed for 24 months. Results There were 03 early and 02 late deaths. Postoperative complications were seen in 24 cases. Eight patients developed bronchopleural fistula with empyema. At a mean follow-up of 2.8 years bacteriological cure was achieved in 62 patients Conclusion Judiciously performed adjuvant surgery can yield excellent long term bacteriological cure with acceptable mortality and morbidity in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Morbidity and drug compliance remain as problem areas.     

Geographic patterns of urban trauma according to mechanism and severity of injury

The purpose of this study was to investigate the distribution of various mechanisms of injury and the relative severity of such injury cases throughout the different geographic zones of a large urban area using a computerized emergency medical services (EMS) dispatch/patient record database. The study city (population, 2 million residents) was divided into 156 geographic grids (each 4.5 by 3 miles) and the incidence and relative severity of various injury mechanisms were determined for each zone. Results: In one year (1988), there were more than 115,000 separate EMS incidents involving more than 150,000 patients, 26,000 of whom were transported for injuries incurred in 10,064 motor vehicle accidents, 4,587 falls, 4,015 lacerations/stabwounds, 1,796 beatings, 1,270 gunshots, and 952 auto-pedestrian accidents. Analysis of the 156 zones showed a disproportionate number of EMS responses in the city center with two centralmost grids accounting for about 25% of all responses. Call volume then progressively diminished toward the periphery of the city. However, with some very minor exceptions, the relative incidence and severity of the various injury mechanisms remained proportionally uniform within each zone, regardless of geographic location. Therefore, contrary to popular notoriety, the incidence and associated severity of any given injury type generally was not necessarily predicted by any particular neighborhood predilection for it, but rather by the overall demand for EMS in that zone of the city.     

A 10-year review of blunt renal artery injuries at an urban level I trauma centre

Introduction

Little consensus exists over the management of high-grade renal injuries, with continued debate over observation versus invasive surgery. Blunt renal artery injury (BRAI) is a high-grade injury that may result in renal dysfunction, hypertension, or failure.

Materials and methods

Management of BRAI at a level I trauma centre during a decade was retrospectively reviewed to determine incidence, assess management strategy, and evaluate hospital outcomes. Data collected included demographics, injury details, standardised scoring, renal injury grade, haemodynamic stability, diagnostic modalities, medical interventions, mortality, and hospitalisation length.

Results

Thirty-eight BRAI patients (21 Grade IV and 17 Grade V injuries) were admitted, representing 0.16% of trauma admissions, and consisting primarily of young males. Ultrasonography and CT was performed in 92.1% and 76.3% of patients, respectively. Primary management included exploratory laparotomy in 42.9%, angiography and embolisation in 34.3%, and observation in 22.9%. Six nephrectomies and one revascularisation were performed. The incidence of BRAI and use of angiography are higher than those reported in previous studies.

Conclusion

Over the past decade, increased use of CT as a diagnostic tool for confirming renal injury in haemodynamically stable patients at our institution may have contributed to the increase in BRAI detection. Higher utilisation of angiography has enabled a more conservative approach. In this series, angiography had a success rate of 94.4%. Angiography and embolisation or observation with careful monitoring are viable management options in haemodynamically stable patients with isolated BRAI.     

Time to intervention in patients with splenic injury in a Dutch level 1 trauma centre

Background

Timely intervention in patients with splenic injury is essential, since delay to treatment is associated with an increased risk of mortality. Transcatheter Arterial Embolisation (TAE) is increasingly used as an adjunct to non-operative management. The aim of this study was to report time intervals between admission to the trauma room and start of intervention (TAE or splenic surgery) in patients with splenic injury.

Methods

Consecutive patients with splenic injury aged ≥16 years admitted between January 2006 and January 2012 were included. Data were reported according to haemodynamic status (stable versus unstable). In haemodynamically (HD) unstable patients, transfusion requirement, intervention-related complications and the need for a re-intervention were compared between the TAE and splenic surgery group.

Results

The cohort consisted of 96 adults of whom 16 were HD unstable on admission. In HD stable patients, median time to intervention was 105 (IQR 77–188) min: 117 (IQR 78–233) min for TAE compared to 95 (IQR 69–188) for splenic surgery (p = 0.58). In HD unstable patients, median time to intervention was 58 (IQR 41–99) min: 46 (IQR 27–107) min for TAE compared to 64 (IQR 45–80) min for splenic surgery (p = 0.76). The median number of transfused packed red blood cells was 8 (3–22) in HD unstable patients treated with TAE versus 24 (9–55) in the surgery group (p = 0.09). No intervention-related complications occurred in the TAE group and one in the splenic surgery group (p = 0.88). Two spleen related re-interventions were performed in the TAE group versus 3 in the splenic surgery group (p = 0.73).

Conclusions

Time to intervention did not differ significantly between HD unstable patients treated with TAE and patients treated with splenic surgery. Although no difference was observed with regard to intervention-related complications and the need for a re-intervention, a trend towards lower transfusion requirement was observed in patients treated with TAE compared to patients treated with splenic surgery. We conclude that if 24/7 interventional radiology facilities are available, TAE is not associated with time loss compared to splenic surgery, even in HD unstable patients.     

Analysis of usage and associated cost of external fixators at an urban level 1 trauma centre

Objective

To determine the usage, indication, duration, and cost associated with external fixation usage. Additionally, to show the significant cost associated with external fixator use and reinvigorate discussions on external fixator reuse.

Design, setting, and patients

A retrospective review of a prospectively gathered trauma database was undertaken to identify all patients treated with external fixation frames for pelvic and lower extremity injuries between September 2007 and July 2010.

Main outcome and measures

We noted the indications for frame use, and we determined the average duration of external fixation for each indication. The cost of each frame was calculated from implant records.

Results

341 lower extremity and pelvic fractures were treated with external fixation frames during the study period. Of these, 92% were used as temporary external fixation. The average duration of temporary external fixation was 10.5 days. The cost of external fixation frame components was $670,805 per year. The average cost per external fixation frame was $5900.

Conclusions

The majority of external fixators are intended as temporary frames, in place for a limited period of time prior to definitive fixation of skeletal injuries. As such, most frames are not intended to withstand physiologic loads, nor are they expected provide a precise maintenance of reduction. Given the considerable expense associated with external fixation frame components, the practice of purchasing external fixation frame components as disposable “single-use” items appears to be somewhat wasteful.

Level of evidence

Level II.     

Comparison of the new injury severity score and the injury severity score in multiple trauma patients

Objective： To assess whether these characteristics of less misclassification and greater area under receiver operator characteristic （ROC） curve of the new injury severity score （NISS） are better than the injury severity score （ISS） as applying it to our multiple trauma patients registered into the emergency intensive care unit （EICU）.
Methods： This was a retrospective review of registry data from 2 286 multiple trauma patients consecutively registered into the EICU from January 1,1997 to December 31, 2006 in the Second Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University in China. Comparisons between ISS and NISS were made using misclassification rates, ROC curve analysis, and the H-L statistics by univariate and multivariate logistic progression model.
Results： Among the 2 286 patients, 176 （7.7%） were excluded because of deaths on arrival or patients less than 16 years of age. The study population therefore comprised 2 1 10 patients. Mean EICU length of stay （LOS） was 7.8 days ± 2.4 days. Compared with the blunt injury group, the penetrating injury group had a higher percentage of male, lower mean EICU LOS and age. The most frequently injured body regions were extremities and head/neck, followed by thorax, face and abdomen in the blunt injury group; whereas, thorax and abdomen were more frequently seen in the penetrating injury group. The minimum misclassification rate for NISS was slightly less than ISS in all groups （4.01% versus 4.49%）. However, NISS had more tendency to misclassify in the penetrating injury group. This, we noted, was attributed mainly to a higher false-positive rate （21.04% versus 15.55% for IS S, t=-3.310, P〈0.001）, resulting in an overall misclassification rate of 23.57% for NISS versus 18.79% for ISS （t=3.290, P〈0.001）. In the whole sample, NISS presented equivalent discrimination （area under ROC curve： NISS=0.938 versus ISS=0.943）. The H-L statistics showed poorer calibration （48.64 versus 32.11, t=3.305, P〈0.001） in     

Perioperative hypotension and discharge outcomes in non-critically injured trauma patients,a single centre retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThere is a lack of information on the effect of age on perioperative care and outcomes after minor trauma in the elderly. We examined the association between perioperative hypotension and discharge outcome among non-critically injured adult patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of non-critically ill patients (ISS <9 or discharged within less than 24 h) who received anaesthesia care for surgery and Recovery Room care at a level-1 trauma centre between 5/1/2012 and 11/30/2013. Perioperative hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg (traditional measure) for all patients, and SBP <110 mmHg (strict measure) for patients ≥65 years. Poor outcome was defined as death or discharge to skilled nursing facility/hospice.Results1744 patients with mean ISS 4.4 across age groups were included; 169 (10%) were ≥65 years. Among patients ≥ 65 years, intraoperative hypotension occurred in >75% (131/169, traditional measure) and in >95% (162/169, strict measure); recovery room hypotension occurred in 2% (4/169) and 29% (49/169), respectively. Mean age-adjusted anaesthetic agent concentration (MAC) was similar across age groups. Opioid use decreased from 9.3 (SD 5.7) mg/h morphine equivalents in patients <55 years to 6.2 (SD 4.0) mg/h in patients over 85 years. Adjusted for gender, ASA score, anaesthesia duration, morphine equivalent/hr, fluid balance, MAC and surgery type, and using traditional definition, older patients were more likely than patients <55 to experience perioperative hypotension: aRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11–1.30 for 55–64 and aRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07–1.32 for ages 65–74. Perioperative hypotension was associated with poor discharge outcome (aRR 1.55; 95% CI 1.04–2.31 and aRR 1.87; 95% CI 1.17–2.98, respectively).ConclusionDespite age related reduction in doses of volatile anaesthetic and opioids administered during anaesthesia care, and regardless of hypotension definition used, non-critically injured patients undergoing surgery experience a large perioperative hypotension burden. This burden is higher for patients 55–74 years and older and is a risk factor for poor discharge outcomes, independent of age and ASA status.     

External validation of a modified trauma and injury severity score model in major trauma injury

BackgroundThe establishment of an accurate prognostic model in major trauma patients is important mainly because this group of patients will benefit the most. Clinical prediction models must be validated internally and externally on a regular basis to ensure the prediction is accurate and current. This study aims to externally validate two prediction models, the Trauma and Injury Severity Score model developed using the Major Trauma Outcome Study in North America (MTOS-TRISS model), and the NTrD-TRISS model, which is a refined MTOS-TRISS model with coefficients derived from the Malaysian National Trauma Database (NTrD), by regarding mortality as the outcome measurement.MethodThis retrospective study included patients with major trauma injuries reported to a trauma centre of Hospital Sultanah Aminah over a 6-year period from 2011 and 2017. Model validation was examined using the measures of discrimination and calibration. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) goodness-of-fit test was used to examine calibration capabilities. The predictive validity of both MTOS-TRISS and NTrD-TRISS models were further evaluated by incorporating parameters such as the New Injury Severity Scale and the Injury Severity Score.ResultsTotal patients of 3788 (3434 blunt and 354 penetrating injuries) with average age of 37 years (standard deviation of 16 years) were included in this study. All MTOS-TRISS and NTrD-TRISS models examined in this study showed adequate discriminative ability with AUCs ranged from 0.86 to 0.89 for patients with blunt trauma mechanism and 0.89 to 0.99 for patients with penetrating trauma mechanism. The H-L goodness-of-fit test indicated the NTrD-TRISS model calibrated as good as the MTOS-TRISS model for patients with blunt trauma mechanism.ConclusionFor patients with blunt trauma mechanism, both the MTOS-TRISS and NTrD-TRISS models showed good discrimination and calibration performances. Discrimination performance for the NTrD-TRISS model was revealed to be as good as the MTOS-TRISS model specifically for patients with penetrating trauma mechanism. Overall, this validation study has ascertained the discrimination and calibration performances of the NTrD-TRISS model to be as good as the MTOS-TRISS model particularly for patients with blunt trauma mechanism.     

Cause of death and time of death distribution of trauma patients in a Level I trauma centre in the Netherlands

Objective

The classical trimodal distribution of trauma deaths describes three peaks of deaths following trauma: immediate, early and late deaths. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether further maturation of the trauma centre and the improvement of survival have had an effect on the time of death distribution and resulted in a shift in causes of death.

Methods

All trauma patients from 1999 to 2010 who died after arrival in the emergency room and prior to discharge from the hospital were included. Deaths caused by drowning, poisoning and overdose were excluded.

Results

A total of 16,421 trauma patients were admitted to our hospital. 772 (4.7 %) patients died, of which 720 were included in this study. The trauma mechanism was predominantly blunt (94.7 %). 530 patients (73.6 %) had Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥25. The most frequent causes of death were central nervous system (CNS) injury (59.9 %), exsanguinations (12.9 %) and pneumonia/respiratory insufficiency (8.5 %). The first peak of death was seen in the first hour after arrival at the emergency department; subsequently, a rapid decline was observed and no further peaks were seen. Over the years, we observed a general decrease in deaths due to exsanguination (p = 0.035) and a general increase in deaths due to CNS injury (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

The temporal distribution of trauma deaths in our hospital changed as maturation of the trauma centre occurred. There is one peak of trauma deaths in the first hour after admission, followed by a rapid decline; no trimodal distribution was observed. Over time, there was a decrease in exsanguinations and an increase of deaths due to CNS injury.     

Air versus ground transport of major trauma patients to a tertiary trauma centre: a province-wide comparison using TRISS analysis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of adult (aged > 15 yr) blunt trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) = 12 who were transported to a single tertiary trauma centre (TTC) by helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) versus those transported by ground ambulance. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all adult (aged > 15 yr) trauma patients between March 27, 1998 and March 28, 2002 with an ISS score = 12, as identified through the provincial trauma registry. We used the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) methodology to determine a difference in outcomes between the 2 groups. RESULTS: We identified 823 patients; of these, we excluded 32 (3.9%) penetrating trauma patients. Of the blunt trauma cases (n = 791) 237 (30%) patients were transported by air and 554 were transported by ground (70%). A total of 770 (97.3%) patients were eligible for TRISS analysis. Using the TRISS methodology, the air group had a Z statistic of 2.77, yielding a W score of 6.40. This compared with the ground transport group, whose Z statistic was 1.97 and W score was 2.39. CONCLUSION: The transport of trauma patients with an ISS = 12 by a provincially dedicated rotor wing air medical service was associated with statistically significantly better outcomes than those transported by standard ground ambulance. This is the first large Canadian study to specifically compare the outcome of patients transported by ground with those transported by air.     

Perioperative management of laryngotracheobronchial injury: our experience in a level 1 trauma centre

Purpose

Laryngotracheobronchial injuries (LTBI) are serious injuries because of their consequences in terms of ventilation, coupled with the severity of other injuries associated with them. We share our experience in managing these patients perioperatively in our level 1 trauma centre.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the records of 30 patients with LTBI who presented at Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Center (JPNATC) from December 2007 to February 2011 was done. The demographics, mechanism of injury, clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities, anaesthetic management and outcome in these patients were reviewed.

Results

Intrathoracic location of the injury and Injury Severity Score (ISS) had a direct correlation with the outcome of the patients. The overall mortality was 6.7?%.

Conclusion

Meticulous examination, details about the mechanism of injury, careful diagnostic evaluation, and skilful airway and surgical management are necessary for a better outcome in patients with airway injuries. A high degree of suspicion in occult injuries and liberal use of a fibreoptic bronchoscope aids diagnosis and management. Prompt airway management in the pre-hospital setting before transfer to a higher level trauma centre ensures better outcomes.