Baveno VI criteria as a prognostic factor for clinical complications in patients with compensated cirrhosis

BackgroundCombination of liver stiffness measurement and platelets count is a tool to safely rule out varices needing treatment (VNT) in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). Aims: to evaluate 4-year liver-related complications and survival in low-risk patients according to Baveno VI criteria.Methodswe conducted a monocentric retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all consecutive patients, with cirrhosis (LSM≥12.5 kPa) and without previous complication, evaluated between 2012 and 2015. Liver-related complications and survival were compared between 2 groups of patients: favourable (LSM< 20 kPa and platelet count>150.000/mm3) and unfavourable Baveno VI status patients (LSM ≥ 20 kPa or platelet count ≤150.000/mm3).Results455 patients with cACLD were analysed. Two hundred patients had favourable Baveno VI criteria, 3.6% with VNT. The 4-year probability of being free of acute decompensation was higher in low-risk patients (94.4 ± 1.8% vs. 85.7%±2.6%, p = 0.018). Unfavourable Baveno status was independently associated with acute decompensation. The probability of being free of HCC was significantly higher in low-risk patients (94.2 ± 1.8% vs. 87.6 ± 2.4%, p = 0.048). Liver-related mortality was not different between the 2 groups (p = 0.56).ConclusionThe Baveno VI criteria could predict clinical outcome in cACLD.     

Evaluation of three “beyond Baveno VI” criteria to safely spare endoscopies in compensated advanced chronic liver disease

BackgroundLiver stiffness measurement (LSM) <20 kPa and platelet count >150,000/mm³ exclude varices needing treatment (VNT) in viral compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD), saving-up to 20–25% endoscopies (Baveno VI criteria). Refinements of such criteria to further reduce endoscopies and an approach without LSM (Platelet 150/MELD 6) were later proposed.AimsTo assess LSM 25/platelet 125, LSM 25/platelet 110 (Expanded-Baveno VI) and Platelet 150/MELD 6 accuracy versus Baveno VI criteria, and the impact of platelet count variability on criteria accuracy in all-etiologies cACLD.MethodscACLD patients undergoing screening endoscopy with laboratory data within 6 months and LSM within one year.ResultsOf 442 patients, 31% had varices (7% with VNT). Baveno VI criteria had 100% sensitivity (Se) and negative predictive value (NPV) and spared 19.5% endoscopies. “LSM 25/platelet 125” and “Expanded-Baveno VI” criteria maintained such accuracy, sparing 15% and 24% more endoscopies, respectively (p < 0.001). Platelet 150/MELD 6 was less accurate, misclassifying 10% VNT. Platelet count variability exceeded 8% and one VNT patient was misclassified with both “Expanded-Baveno VI” and “LSM 25/platelet 125” criteria considering the previous platelet count.ConclusionsBoth “Expanded-Baveno VI” and “LSM 25/platelet 125” criteria are accurate in cACLD, but the former are more advantageous. Platelet 150/MELD 6 proved inadequate.     

Elastography-based screening for esophageal varices in patients with advanced chronic liver disease

Elastography-based liver stiffness measurement(LSM) is a non-invasive tool for estimating liver fibrosis but also provides an estimate for the severity of portal hypertension in patients with advanced chronic liver disease(ACLD). The presence of varices and especially of varices needing treatment(VNT) indicates distinct prognostic stages in patients with compensated ACLD(cACLD). The Baveno VI guidelines suggested a simple algorithm based on LSM < 20 kPa(by transient elastography, TE) and platelet count > 150 G/L for ruling-out VNT in patients with cACLD. These(and other) TE-based LSM cut-offs have been evaluated for VNT screening in different liver disease etiologies. Novel point shear-wave elastography(pSWE) and two-dimensional shear wave elastography(2D-SWE) methodologies for LSM have also been evaluated for their ability to screen for "any" varices and for VNT. Finally, the measurement of spleen stiffness(SSM) by elastography(mainly by pSWE and 2D-SWE) may represent another valuable screening tool for varices. Here, we summarize the current literature on elastography-based prediction of "any" varices and VNT. Finally,we have summarized the published LSM and SSM cut-offs in clinically useful scale cards.     

Non-invasive tools for compensated advanced chronic liver disease and portal hypertension after Baveno VII – an update

Non-invasive tests (NITs) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in particular, have entered clinical practice over 20 years ago as point-of-care tests to diagnose liver fibrosis in patients with compensated chronic liver disease. Since then, NITs use has evolved thanks to a large number of studies in all major etiologies of liver disease, and they have become important tools to stratify the risk of portal hypertension and liver-related events. The Baveno VII consensus workshop provided several novel recommendations regarding the use of well-established and novel NITs in the specific setting of portal hypertension screening, diagnosis and follow-up. The Baveno VII expert panels paid special attention to summarizing the existing data into simple clinical rules able to guide clinicians in their practice. The “rule of five” for LSM is a tool to stratify the risk of liver-related events, and LSM alone or in combination with platelet count, can be used now to rule-in and rule-out compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) and clinically significant portal hypertension, as well as to rule-out high-risk varices. Use of NITs in obese subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and patients with viral hepatitis C that has been successfully treated, require specific knowledge. This review will update the reader on these aspects.     

Liver stiffness-based model predicts hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with liver disease

BackgroundThe aim was to develop a model to predict clinically significant portal hypertension, hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg using pre-operative noninvasive makers.MethodsPatients who have been programmed for liver resection/transplantation were enrolled prospectively. Preoperative liver stiffness measurement (LSM), liver function test (LFT), and intraoperative HVPG were assessed. A probability score model to predict HVPG≥10 mmHg called HVPG₁₀ score was developed and validated.ResultsA total of 161 patients [66% men, median age of 63 years] were recruited for the study. Median LSM, and HVPG were 9.5 kPa, and 5 mmHg respectively. HVPG₁₀ score was developed using independent predictors of HVPG≥10 mmHg in the training set were LSM, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, and international normalized ratio. Area under receiver operating curve of HVPG₁₀ score in the training and validation sets were 0.91 and 0.93 respectively with a cutoff of 15. In the overall cohort, HVPG₁₀ score≥15 had 83% accuracy, 90% sensitivity, 81% specificity and 96% negative predictive value in predicting HVPG≥10 mmHg.ConclusionHVPG₁₀ score is an easy-to-use noninvasive continuous scale tool to rule out clinically significant portal hypertension in >95% patients with chronic liver disease.     

Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis

Measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is a standard method for the assessment of portal pressure and correlates with the occurrence of its complications. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) has been proposed as a noninvasive technique for the prediction of the complications of cirrhosis. In this study, we evaluated the ability of LSM to predict severe portal hypertension compared with that of HVPG in 61 consecutive patients with HCV-related chronic liver disease. A strong relationship between LSM and HVPG measurements was found in the overall population (r=0.81, P<0.0001). However, although the correlation was excellent for HVPG values less than 10 or 12 mm Hg (r=0.81, P=0.0003 and r=0.91, P<0.0001, respectively), linear regression analysis was not optimal for HVPG values>or=10 mm Hg (r2=0.35, P<0.0001) or>or=12 mm Hg (r2=0.17, P=0.02). The AUROC for the prediction of HVPG>or=10 and >or=12 mm Hg were 0.99 and 0.92, respectively and at LSM cutoff values of 13.6 kPa and 17.6 kPa, sensitivity was 97% and 94%, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis, LSM positively correlated with the presence of esophageal varices (P=0.002), although no correlation between LSM and esophageal varices size was detected. The area under the ROC for the prediction of EV was 0.76 and at a LSM cutoff value of 17.6 kPa sensitivity was 90%. CONCLUSION: LSM represents a non-invasive tool for the identification of chronic liver disease patients with clinically significant or severe portal hypertension and could be employed for screening patients to be subjected to standard investigations including upper GI endoscopy and hemodynamic studies.     

Non-invasive tests for the prediction of primary hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) is one of the most common malignancies in the world and it is one of the main complications of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Even in the presence of a well-established follow-up protocol for cirrhotic patients, to date poor data are available on predictive markers for primary HCC occurrence in the setting of compensated advanced chronic liver disease patients(c ACLD). The gold standard method to evaluate the prognosis of patients with c ACLD, beyond liver fibrosis assessed with histology, is the measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient(HVPG). An HVPG ≥10 mm Hg has been related to an increased risk of HCC in c ACLD patients.However, these methods are burdened by additional costs and risks for patients and are mostly available only in referral centers. In the last decade increasing research has focused on the evaluation of several, simple, non-invasive tests(NITs) as predictors of HCC development. We reviewed the currently available literature on biochemical and ultrasound-based scores developed for the noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension in predicting primary HCC. We found that the most reliable methods to assess HCC risk were the liver stiffness measurement, the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index score and the fibrosis-4 index. Other promising NITs need further investigations and validation for different liver disease aetiologies.     

Impact of sustained virological response with DAAs on gastroesophageal varices and Baveno criteria in HCV–cirrhotic patients

Background

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) show high efficacy and safety in HCV–cirrhotic patients, but most maintain clinically significant portal hypertension after sustained virological response (SVR). Non-invasive Baveno and expanded-Baveno criteria can identify patients without high-risk gastroesophageal varices (GEV) who have no need for endoscopic surveillance. However, data after SVR are scarce. We performed a multicenter study to evaluate SVR effects over GEV and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive criteria after SVR.

Methods

HCV–cirrhotic patients receiving DAAs and baseline endoscopic evaluation were included (November 2014–October 2015). GEV were classified as low risk (LR-GEV) (< 5 mm) or high risk (HR-GEV) (≥ 5 mm or with risk signs). Transient elastography (TE) and endoscopy were performed during follow-up.

Results

SVR was achieved in 230 (93.1%) of 247 included patients, 151 (65.7%) with endoscopic follow-up. Among 64/151 (42.4%) patients without baseline GEV, 8 (12.5%) developed GEV after SVR. Among 50/151 (33.1%) with baseline LR-GEV, 12 (24%) developed HR-GEV. Patients with GEV progression showed TE ≥ 25 kPa before treatment (64.7%) or ≥ 20 kPa after SVR (66.7%). Only 6% of patients without GEV and LSM < 25 kPa before treatment, and 10% of those with baseline LSM < 25 kPa and LSM < 20 kPa after SVR showed GEV progression after 36 months. The negative predictive value of Baveno and expanded-Baveno criteria to exclude HR-GEV was maintained after SVR (100% and 90.7%, respectively).

Conclusions

HCV–cirrhotic patients can develop HR-GEV after SVR. Surveillance is especially recommended in those with GEV before antiviral treatment. Baveno and expanded-Baveno criteria can be safely applied after SVR. https://clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02758509.

     

Egyptian revalidation of non-invasive parameters for predicting esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients: A retrospective study

Background and study aimsIn resource-limited countries, non-invasive tests for assessing liver fibrosis are a potential alternative to costly endoscopic screening for esophageal varices. We aimed to validate several non-invasive parameters for predicting the presence of varices.Patients and methodsBetween September 2006 and August 2017, a total of 46,014 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as one of the perquisites for receiving hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy were enrolled and divided into group I (without varices) and group II (with varices). Non-invasive parameters of fibrosis, namely Lok index, Bonacini score, liver stiffness, FIB-4, Baveno, and extended Baveno criteria, were validated.ResultsLok index, Bonacini score, liver stiffness, and FIB-4 had areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of >0.6 (all P < 0.01 for the null hypothesis that the AUC was 0.5) for determination of the presence/absence of varices, with cutoff values of 0.80, 6.5, 21.9 kPa, and 2.94, and sensitivities of 74%, 74%, 66%, and 83%, respectively. The expanded Baveno VI criteria performed better than the Baveno VI criteria (spared endoscopy rate 81% versus 63%).ConclusionThe use of non-invasive methods is of limited value in predicting esophageal varices. The limited accuracy of ≤60% may delay the use of appropriate primary prophylaxis against variceal bleeding in a large proportion of cirrhotic patients.     

Plasma Nogo-A and placental growth factor levels are associated with portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND Clinically significant portal hypertension(CSPH) and severe portal hypertension(SPH) increase the risk for decompensation and life-threatening complications in liver cirrhosis. Pathologic angiogenesis might contribute to the formation of these conditions. Placental growth factor(PlGF) and Nogo-A protein are biomarkers of pathological angiogenesis, but data on their role in liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension is scarce.AIM To determine plasma levels of PlGF and Nogo-A in patients with liver cirrhosis,CSPH, SPH and potential to predict portal hypertension.METHODS A cohort of 122 patients with hepatitis C virus and/or alcohol-induced liver cirrhosis with characterized hepatic venous pressure gradient(HVPG) were included in the study. Demographic data, medical history, Child-Turcotte-Pugh and Model of End Stage liver disease score, clinical chemistry, liver stiffnessvalues were recorded on the day of the procedure prior HVPG measurement. The degree of portal hypertension was determined by the invasive HVPG measurement. Nogo-A and PlGF plasma levels were evaluated using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. The control group consisted of 30 healthy age-and sex-matched individuals.RESULTS Peripheral PlGF levels were higher and Nogo-A levels were lower in patients with liver cirrhosis(23.20 vs 9.85; P 0.0001 and 2.19 vs 3.12; P = 0.004 respectively). There was a positive linear correlation between peripheral levels of PlGF and HVPG(r = 0.338, P = 0.001) and negative linear correlation between the peripheral Nogo-A levels and HVPG(r =-0.267, P = 0.007). PlGF levels were higher in CSPH and SPH(P = 0.006; P 0.0001) whereas Nogo-A levels were lower(P = 0.01; P 0.033). Area under the curve for the diagnosis of CSPH for PlGF was 0.68(P = 0.003) and for Nogo-A-0.67(P = 0.01); for SPH 0.714(P 0.0001) and 0.65(P = 0.014) respectively. PlGF levels were higher and Nogo-A levels were lower in patients with esophageal varices(P 0.05). PlGF cut-off value of 25 pg/mL distinguished patients with CSPH at 55.7% sensitivity and76.7% specificity; whereas Nogo-A cut-off value of 1.12 ng/mL was highly specific(93.1%) for the diagnosis of CSPH.CONCLUSION Plasma PlGF levels were higher while Nogo-A levels were lower in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Biomarkers showed moderate predictive value in determining CSPH and SPH.     

The interplay between sarcopenia and portal hypertension predicts ascites and mortality in cirrhosis

BackgroundThe role of sarcopenia in predicting decompensation other than hepatic encephalopathy is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of sarcopenia, assessed by computed tomography (CT), in the development of ascites and mortality in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) outside the liver transplantation (LT) setting.Material and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated ACLD patients with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) >10 kPa and an available CT scan within 6 months. Sarcopenia was defined as skeletal muscle index (SMI) <50 and <39 cm²/m², respectively, in men and women. Competing risk regression models were used to assess the variables associated with the main outcomes.Results209 patients were included in the final analysis and sarcopenia was present in 134 (64.1%). During a median follow-up of 37 (20–63) months, 52 patients developed ascites, 24 underwent LT, and 30 died. Sarcopenia was found a predictive factor of decompensation with ascites (SHR 2.083, 95%-CI: 1.091–3.978), independently from the features of clinically significant portal hypertension (LSM≥21 kPa or portosystemic shunts). Sarcopenia (SHR: 2.744, 95%-CI: 1.105–6.816) and LSM≥21 kPa (SHR: 3.973, 95%-CI: 1.548–10.197) were independent risk factors for increased mortality.ConclusionsSarcopenia and portal hypertension are two major and independent risk factors for decompensation with ascites and mortality in cirrhotic patients outside the LT context.     

Role of hepatic vein catheterisation and transient elastography in the diagnosis of idiopathic portal hypertension

Background

Idiopathic portal hypertension is a rare cause of portal hypertension, frequently misdiagnosed as cryptogenic cirrhosis. This study evaluates specific findings at hepatic vein catheterisation or liver stiffness in idiopathic portal hypertension.

Methods

39 cases of idiopathic portal hypertension patients were retrospectively reviewed. Hepatic vein catheterisation and liver stiffness measurements were compared to matched patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, and non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis, included as controls.

Results

Hepatic vein-to-vein communications were found in 49% idiopathic portal hypertension patients precluding adequate hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements in 12. In the remaining 27 patients, mean hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was 7.1 ± 3.1 mmHg. Only 5 patients had HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg. HVPG was markedly lower than in cirrhosis (17 ± 3 mmHg, p < 0.001). Mean liver stiffness in idiopathic portal hypertension was 8.4 ± 3.3 kPa; significantly higher than in non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (6.4 ± 2.2 kPa, p = 0.009), but lower than in cirrhosis (40.9 ± 20.5 kPa, p = 0.005). Only 2 idiopathic portal hypertension patients had liver stiffness >13.6 kPa.

Conclusions

Patients with idiopathic portal hypertension frequently have hepatic vein-to-vein communications and, despite unequivocal signs of portal hypertension, HVPG and liver stiffness values much lower than the cut-off for clinical significant portal hypertension in cirrhosis. These findings oblige to formally rule-out idiopathic portal hypertension in the presence of signs of portal hypertension.     

Comparison of the diagnostic quality of aspiration and core-biopsy needles for transjugular liver biopsy

BackgroundLiver biopsy remains essential for the diagnostic work-up of patients with liver disease.AimsTo evaluate aspiration vs. core-biopsy needles for transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) in patients undergoing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements.Methods84 patients undergoing TJLB between 06/2017 and 12/2018 were prospectively included. Liver biopsy specimens were systematically evaluated for quantitative and qualitative criteria such as number of portal tracts, sample length and fragmentation.ResultsIn direct comparison of paired TJLB specimens (n=35), core-biopsy samples were significantly longer (median 12 vs. 9mm, p=0.012), tended to contain more portal tracts (median 8 vs. 6, p=0.064) and were less fragmented (p<0.001), which resulted in better confidence for liver fibrosis assessment (p=0.035). However, a superior quality in terms of less fragmentation of core-biopsy specimens (p<0.05) was only confirmed in patients with HVPG ≥10mmHg or liver stiffness measurement >40kPa. In contrast, the aspiration needle provided significantly longer samples in patients with HVPG <10mmHg (median 21 vs. 12mm, p=0.007) or with liver stiffness measurement <20kPa (median 21 vs. 11mm, p=0.025).ConclusionIn patients with HVPG ≥10mmHg, we recommend to performed TJLB using core-biopsy needles, while the aspiration needle provides high quality liver biopsy specimens in patients with HVPG <10mmHg.     

6-thioguanine associated nodular regenerative hyperplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease may induce portal hypertension

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest an association between 6-thioguanine (6-TG) therapy and hepatic nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). An influence of 6-TG on portal pressure remains to be determined. The aim of the study was to examine the functional relevance of long-term 6-TG treatment on hepatic hemodynamics in IBD patients and its association with NRH. METHODS: Patients treated with 6-TG for IBD underwent measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and liver biopsy. 6-TG therapy was stopped when NRH was diagnosed. If elevated, HVPG measurement was repeated after 1 yr. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (15 women, 11 men; median age 41 yr, range 23-76) treated with 6-TG for 38 months (median; range 12-45) were included. Among 24 patients with sufficient liver biopsy, 6 patients (25%) were diagnosed with NRH. In these 6 patients, the HVPG was higher (median HVPG 7 mmHg, range 3-14) than in the 18 patients without NRH (median 3 mmHg, range 2-5; P < 0.001). In the patients with NRH, two had clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (13 and 14 mmHg, respectively); in one patient the HVPG was slightly elevated (7 mmHg). No overt clinical signs of portal hypertension were observed. One year after stopping 6-TG therapy, HVPG decreased in all 3 patients with initially elevated HVPG levels. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that IBD patients under long-term 6-TG therapy are at a substantial risk for developing NRH. NRH results in elevation of HVPG and may cause CSPH. Discontinuation of 6-TG therapy extenuates portal hypertension and may thus reduce the risk of complications.     

Effect of viral suppression on hepatic venous pressure gradient in hepatitis C with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Portal hypertension is a predictor of liver‐related clinical events and mortality in patients with hepatitis C and cirrhosis. The effect of interferon‐free hepatitis C treatment on portal pressure is unknown. Fifty patients with Child‐Pugh‐Turcotte (CPT) A and B cirrhosis and portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] >6 mm Hg) were randomized to receive 48 weeks of open‐label sofosbuvir plus ribavirin at Day 1 or after a 24‐week observation period. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12) in patients who received ≥1 dose of treatment. Secondary endpoints included changes in HVPG, laboratory parameters, and MELD and CPT scores. A subset of patients was followed 48 weeks posttreatment to determine late changes in HVPG. SVR12 occurred in 72% of patients (33/46). In the 37 patients with paired HVPG measurements at baseline and the end of treatment, mean HVPG decreased by ‐1.0 (SD 3.97) mm Hg. Nine patients (24%) had ≥20% decreases in HVPG during treatment. Among 39 patients with pretreatment HVPG ≥12 mm Hg, 27 (69%) achieved SVR12. Four of the 33 (12%) patients with baseline HVPG ≥12 mm Hg had HVPG <12 mm Hg at the end of treatment. Of nine patients with pretreatment HVPG ≥12 mm Hg who achieved SVR12 and completed 48 weeks of follow‐up, eight (89%) had a ≥20% reduction in HVPG, and three reduced their pressure to <12 mm Hg. Patients with chronic HCV and compensated or decompensated cirrhosis who achieve SVR can have clinically meaningful reductions in HVPG at long‐term follow‐up. (EudraCT 2012‐002457‐29).     

Liver collagen proportionate area predicts decompensation in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus cirrhosis after liver transplantation

Background and Aims: Current histological scoring systems do not subclassify cirrhosis. Computer‐assisted digital image analysis (DIA) of Sirius Red‐stained sections measures fibrosis morphologically producing a fibrosis ratio (collagen proportionate area [CPA]). CPA could have prognostic value within a disease stage, such as cirrhosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate CPA in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) allograft cirrhosis and assess its relationship with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). Methods: In 121 consecutively‐transplanted HCV patients with HVPG, measured contemporaneously with transjugular liver biopsies, 65 had Ishak stage 5 or 6 disease (43 with HVPG measurement). Biopsies were stained with Sirius Red for DIA, and the collagen content was expressed as a CPA. In three cases, a tissue for Sirius Red staining was not obtained, and the patients were excluded. Results: Sixty‐two patients were analyzed. The median HVPG was 8 mmHg (interquartile range [IQR]: 5–10). Portal hypertension (HVPG ≥ 6 < 10 mmHg) was present in 30 (69.8%), and HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg in 13 (30.2%). The median CPA was 16% (IQR 10.75–23.25). Median Child–Pugh score and HVPG were not significantly different between Ishak fibrosis stage 5 or 6, whereas CPA was statistically different: 13% in stage 5 (IQR 8.3–12.4) versus 23% in stage 6 (IQR 17–33.7, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, CPA was the only variable significantly associated with clinically‐significant portal hypertension (HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg, odds ratio: 1.085, confidence interval: 1.004–1.172, P = 0.040). A CPA of 14% was the best cut‐off value for clinically‐significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and liver decompensation, which occurred in 24 patients. Event‐free survival was significantly shorter in patients with CSPH or with a CPA value ≥ 14%, or with a combination of both. Conclusion: In Ishak stages 5 and 6, CPA correlated with HVPG, but had a wider range of values, suggesting a greater sensitivity for distinguishing “early” from “late” severe fibrosis/cirrhosis. CPA was a unique, independent predictor of HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg. CPA can be used to subclassify cirrhosis and for prognostic stratification.     

Use of transient elastography (FibroScan®) for the noninvasive assessment of portal hypertension in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients

The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for assessing portal pressure and correlates with the occurrence of portal hypertension (PH)-related complications. Transient elastography (TE) is a new, highly accurate noninvasive technique, which enables us to evaluate hepatic fibrosis to detect advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. We performed a hepatic haemodynamic study and TE in 38 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. The association between HVPG and liver stiffness was assessed by linear regression. The diagnostic value of TE was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. We considered clinically significant PH as an HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg and severe PH as an HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg. A total of 38 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were included. Twenty-eight patients (73.7%) had clinically significant PH (HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg), and 23 (60.5%) of these had severe PH (HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg). We found a statistically significant association between liver stiffness (kPa) and HVPG (r(2) = 0.46, P < 0.001, straight line equation HVPG=7.4 + 0.204*TE). The areas under the ROC curves were 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64-0.97] and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.66-0.94) for the prediction of HVPG ≥ 10 and ≥ 12 mmHg, respectively. Our data suggest that TE can predict the presence of clinically significant and severe PH in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.     

Von Willebrand factor as new noninvasive predictor of portal hypertension, decompensation and mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis

von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF-Ag) is elevated in patients with liver cirrhosis, but the clinical significance is unclear. We hypothesized that vWF-Ag levels may correlate with portal pressure, measured by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), and predict clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH; HVPG ≥10 mmHg), decompensation and mortality. Portal hemodynamics were assessed by HVPG measurement, whereas vWF-Ag levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. During follow-up, complications of liver cirrhosis, death or transplantation were recorded. Two hundred and eighty-six patients (205 male and 81 female; mean age, 56 years) with liver cirrhosis were included. vWF-Ag correlated with HVPG (r = 0.69; P < 0.0001) and predicted CSPH independently of Child Pugh score. Higher vWF-Ag levels were associated with varices (odds ratio [OR] = 3.27; P < 0.001), ascites (OR = 3.93; P < 0.001) and mortality (hazard ratio: 4.41; P < 0.001). Using a vWF-Ag cut-off value of ≥241%, the AUC for detection of CSPH in compensated patients was 0.85, with a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 87% and 80%, respectively. Compensated patients had 25% mortality after 53 months if the vWF-Ag was <315% compared to 15 months in patients with vWF-Ag >315% (P < 0.001). Decompensated patients had a mortality of 25% after 37 and 7 months if their vWF-Ag was <315% and >315%, respectively (P = 0.002). In compensated patients with a vWF-Ag >315% median time to decompensation or death was 32 months compared with 59 months in patients with vWF-Ag <315%. vWF-Ag equals Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) in mortality prediction (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.71 for vWF-Ag versus AUC = 0.65 for MELD; P = 0.2). Conclusion: vWF-Ag is a new, simple and noninvasive predictor of CSPH. A vWF-Ag cut-off value at 315% can clearly stratify patients with compensated and decompensated liver cirrhosis in two groups with completely different survival. vWF-Ag may become a valuable marker for the prediction of mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis in clinical practice. (HEPATOLOGY 2012).     

Serum levels of soluble dipeptidyl peptidase-4 in type 2 diabetes are associated with severity of liver fibrosis evaluated by transient elastography (FibroScan) and the FAST (FibroScan-AST) score,a novel index of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant fibrosis

AimTo investigate the relationship in people with type 2 diabetes between serum soluble dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (sDDP-4) and degree of liver fibrosis assessed as the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and FAST (FibroScan-AST) score, both of which were measured by transient elastography (FibroScan).Subjects and methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we examined 115 patients with type 2 diabetes. With transient elastography (FibroScan), we assessed the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) as measures of hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis, respectively. We calculated the FAST score, which identifies progressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), from CAP, LSM, and the serum aspartate aminotransferase level. Significant hepatic steatosis was defined as CAP ≥280 dB/m; and significant liver fibrosis, as LSM ≥ 8.0 kPa. LSM was divided into 3 severity levels: significant fibrosis (8.0 to <9.7 kPa); advanced fibrosis, (9.7 to <13.0 kPa); and liver cirrhosis (≥ 13.0 kPa).ResultsSerum sDPP-4 correlated positively with liver enzymes, CAP, LSM, and FAST score. Multivariate analysis showed that LSM remained to be an independent factor for serum sDDP-4. Serum sDPP-4 was significantly higher in patients with LSM ≥ 8.0 kPa than in those with LSM <8.0 kPa and was significantly elevated in patients who are at risk for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with fibrosis (FAST score ≥ 035 or 0.67). Patients with both hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis had the highest serum sDPP-4.ConclusionSerum sDPP-4 was strongly associated with severity of liver fibrosis evaluated by LSM and the FAST score and was markedly elevated in diabetic patients with LSM ≥ 13.0 kPa indicating probable cirrhosis.     

Correlation of transient elastography with hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension: A study of 326 patients from India

AIM To study the diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography(TE) for detecting clinically significant portal hypertension(CSPH) in Indian patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.METHODS This retrospective study was conducted at the Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology, and Panceatico-Biliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, on consecutive patients with cirrhosis greater than 15 years of age who underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient(HVPG) and TE from July 2011 to May 2016. Correlation between HVPG and TE was analyzed using the Spearman's correlation test. Receiver operating characteristic ( ROC) curves were prepared for determining the utility of TE in predicting various stages of portal hypertension. The best cut-off value of TE forthe diagnosis of CSPH was obtained using the Youden index.RESULTS The study included 326 patients [median age 52(range 16-90) years; 81% males]. The most common etiology of cirrhosis was cryptogenic(45%) followed by alcohol(34%). The median HVPG was 16.0(range 1.5 to 30.5) mm Hg. Eighty-five percent of patients had CSPH. A significant positive correlation was noted between TE and HVPG(rho 0.361, P 0.001). The area under ROC curve for TE in predicting CSPH was 0.740(95%CI: 0.662-0.818)(P 0.01). A cut-off value of TE of 21.6 k Pa best predicted CSPH with a positive predictive value(PPV) of 93%.CONCLUSION TE has a fair positive correlation with HVPG; thus, TE can be used as a non-invasive modality to assess the degree of portal hypertension. A cut-off TE value of 21.6 k Pa identifies CSPH with a PPV of 93%.