Immunotherapy in Gastric Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibition is a new standard of targeted therapy in the treatment of advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (GC) and is represented in various combinations with and without chemotherapy in every therapy line within clinical trials. In advanced adenocarcinoma of GC, gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) and esophageal cancer (EC), the combination of nivolumab and chemotherapy in first-line therapy improves overall survival (OS) in PD-L1 (programmed cell death protein 1)-positive patients with approval in Europe (PD-L1 CPS (combined positivity score) ≥ 5), USA and Taiwan (CHECKMATE-649) and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for GEJC and EC in Europe (CPS ≥ 10) and the USA (KEYNOTE-590). Furthermore, pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy show clear benefits in OS and are approved as first-line treatment of Her2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor-2)-positive tumors in the USA (KEYNOTE-811). Nivolumab demonstrates superior OS regardless of PD-L1 expression in third-line therapy with approval in Japan (ATTRACTION-02) and pembrolizumab prolonged the duration of response in PD-L1 positive patients with approval in the USA in PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 patients (KEYNOTE-059). This review reflects the rationale and current results of phase II and III clinical trials investigating various immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-L1/1 and CTLA (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen)-4 in combination with and without chemotherapy and Her2-targeted therapy in GC.     

PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在晚期非小细胞肺癌中的治疗进展

程序性死亡受体1(programmed death 1,PD-1)抑制剂Pembrolizumab进入一线正式标志着免疫检查点抑制剂在晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的治疗体系中占据了重要地位.临床试验结果证实PD-1/程序性死亡配体1(programmed death ligand 1,PD-L1)抑制剂在晚期NSCLC的一线、二线和多药耐药后治疗的疗效均要优于传统的化疗.一线使用Pembrolizumab联合化疗的客观有效率(objective response rate,ORR)最高可达80%;单药Pembrolizumab的无疾病进展时间(progression-free survival,PFS)接近1年(10.3个月),死亡风险比含铂双药化疗下降40%.单药Pembrolizumab、Nivolumab和Atezolizumab用于二线的疗效同样突出,总生存时间(overall survival,OS)可至1年左右.PD-L1的表达是PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂疗效的预测因子,在晚期NSCLC中阳性(≥1%)的比例约为60%左右,组织类型间差异不大,但是目前并无检测的金标准.     

Aktuelle Systemtherapie des metastasierten Harnblasenkarzinoms

In November 2016 results of a phase III clinical trial with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab for second-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma were published, which showed an overall survival benefit in comparison with conventional chemotherapy with vinflunine, docetaxel or paclitaxel. Other PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are being tested in phase III trials for different stages of urothelial carcinoma. On 2 June 2017 nivolumab was approved in Europe as the first PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor for the second-line treatment of urothelial carcinoma. Other approvals are expected within this year possibly making this substance class the new standard for second-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Currently, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are also being tested for first-line treatment using different approaches either as a monotherapy or in combination with conventional chemotherapy or CTLA-4 inhibitors. Whereas data from single-arm phase II clinical trials have already been published, first phase III data are expected for the end of 2017. A new therapy approach evaluates the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for the perioperative treatment of patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after complete surgical R0 resection (radical cystectomy or nephroureterectomy). Two international phase III trials on adjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and atezolizumab are currently recruiting patients, which is likely to be completed in early 2018.     

Pembrolizumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis providing level 1a evidence

The recent introduction of immunotherapy in the first line setting of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) has dramatically improved patients’ prognosis. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to provide level 1a evidence supporting the use of pembrolizumab plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) as first-line treatment for advanced RCC. All published randomized prospective trials including patients with advanced RCC treated with pembrolizumab in combination with TKIs vs Sunitinib were included in this meta-analysis. An algorithm was used to reconstruct survival data from the published Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DoR) from the included trials. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for comparison among the different regimens was calculated. Main outcomes were differences in RMST for OS, PFS and DoR for pembrolizumab plus TKIs vs sunitinib arm. Reconstructed survival data from 1,573 patients were retrieved from 2 trials (KEYNOTE-581 and KEYNOTE-426) comparing pembrolizumab plus TKI (lenvatinib or axitinib, respectively) to sunitinib. Patients who received pembrolizumab-lenvatinib or pembrolizumab-axinitinib had better OS (24-month ΔRMST of 1.79 months [95% CI: 0.12-2.50; P < 0.001]), PFS (24-month ΔRMST of 3.83 months [95% CI: 2.93-4.74; P < 0.001]) and DoR (24-month ΔRMST of 2.32 months [95% CI: 0.97-3.67; P < 0.001]) relative to sunitinib. Pembrolizumab-lenvatinib combination gave a marginal benefit in terms of OS, PFS and DoR relative to pembrolizumab-axitinib group. By relying on individual survival data, we provided a level-1a evidence supporting the use of pembrolizumab plus TKI for first-line aRCC treatment.     

Emerging Role of Immunotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Purpose of Review

Advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has long been treated preferably with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, but many patients are cisplatin-ineligible whereas for those who progress on a platinum-based regimen treatment options are limited. We review key recent data regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors that are changing this treatment landscape.

Recent Findings

Since May 2016, five different agents targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway (atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, durvalumab) have received FDA approval for the treatment of aUC in the platinum-refractory setting, while pembrolizumab and atezolizumab are FDA-approved for cisplatin-ineligible patients in the first-line setting. Clinical outcomes and safety profiles of these agents appear relatively comparable across separate trials; however, only pembrolizumab is supported by level I evidence from a large randomized phase III trial showing overall survival benefit over conventional cytotoxic salvage chemotherapy in the platinum-refractory setting.

Summary

Pembrolizumab has the highest level of evidence in platinum-refractory aUC, whereas pembrolizumab and atezolizumab have comparable level of evidence in the frontline setting in cisplatin-ineligible patients. Ongoing research is evaluating novel agents, various rational combinations, and sequences, as well as predictive and prognostic biomarkers.

     

Comparative Efficacy of Second- and Subsequent-line Treatments for Metastatic NSCLC: A Fractional Polynomials Network Meta-analysis of Cancer Immunotherapies

BackgroundExtended onset of treatment effect and longer-term survival with anti–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapies, atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, have changed the landscape of second- or subsequent-line (2L+) treatments for adults with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This systematic literature review included phase I to IV randomized, controlled trials of 2L+ NSCLC therapies from MEDLINE, Embase, and secondary sources.Materials and MethodsStudies of treatments approved in the European Union or United States had to be in English with ≥ 10 patients per arm. A fractional polynomials network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted because traditional NMA of hazard ratios does not account for delayed onset of clinical effect or long-term survival observed in PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitor trials. Adjusted analyses accounted for treatment switching in the atezolizumab OAK trial. Expected survival time reflected area under the curve over the time horizon. Expected overall survival (OS) was ranked by median ranking with 95% credible intervals and by surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Of 25,115 screened records, 28 studies were included in the quantitative analyses of OS and progression-free survival.ResultsPD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors had comparable expected 5-year OS; all performed better than other treatment options. In unadjusted analyses, surface under the cumulative ranking curve ranked nivolumab first (87.9%), followed by atezolizumab (85.8%) and pembrolizumab (82.8%). Analyses adjusted for patients switching from docetaxel to immunotherapy ranked atezolizumab first (89.6%), followed by nivolumab (86.5%) and pembrolizumab (81.9%).ConclusionThis NMA applied an appropriate approach for indirect comparisons, including cancer immunotherapies, and supported robustness of PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapies for 2L+ treatment of NSCLC.     

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer

BackgroundTrastuzumab plus chemotherapy is the standard-of-care (SoC) first-line therapy for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. Combining PD-1 antibody with SoC first-line therapy showed encouraging results in the KEYNOTE-811 study. The retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SoC vs. SoC plus camrelizumab (PD-1 antibody) as a first-line treatment for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer in a real-world setting.MethodsThis study included 41 patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer who received SoC or SoC plus camrelizumab from June 2017 to December 2020. The endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsThirteen patients received SoC (SoC group) and 28 patients received SoC plus camrelizumab (camrelizumab group). As of December 2020, the median follow-up time was 10.0 months. In the camrelizumab and SoC groups, the ORRs were 75.0% and 46.2% (P=0.032), respectively. The DCR was 96.4% in the camrelizumab group and 69.2% in the SoC group (P=0.003). The median OS was 18.4 in the camrelizumab group and 13.2 months in the SoC group [hazard ratio (HR) =0.343; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.151–0.783; P=0.008]. The median PFS was 3.78 in the camrelizumab group and 1.74 months in the SoC group (HR =0.416; 95% CI: 0.186–0.932; P=0.027). In the HER2 subgroups in the camrelizumab group, the median PFS of immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ vs. IHC 2+ fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was 11.3 vs. 9.0 months (HR =1.684; 95% CI: 0.710–3.994; P=0.047). The incidence rates of reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) (P<0.001), abnormal liver function (P=0.040), and hypothyroidism (P=0.039) between the two groups were significantly different. RCCEP and hypothyroidism were considered to be related to camrelizumab.ConclusionsFirst-line treatment with camrelizumab combined with SoC showed significant clinical benefits and good tolerance compared with SoC for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.     

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review of phase-3 clinical trials

BACKGROUNDThe outcomes of patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who are not candidates for local salvage therapy and of those diagnosed with recurrent or metastatic disease are dismal. A relatively new systemic therapy option that emerged in recent years in the treatment of advanced HNSCC is immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The safety profile and anti-tumor activity of these agents demonstrated in early phase clinical trials paved the way to the initiation of several promising phase-3 trials in the field.AIMTo evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of ICIs in HNSCC, based on published phase-3 clinical trials.METHODSWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus to identify published literature evaluating immunotherapy using ICIs in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC (R/M HNSCC) and locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). We used a combination of standardized search terms and keywords including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, recurrent, metastatic, locally advanced, immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), cytotoxic T- lymphocyte associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), and phase-3 clinical trial. A sensitive search filter was used to limit our results to randomized controlled trials.RESULTSFive phase-3 clinical trials have reported the data on the effectiveness of immunotherapy in HNSCC so far: Four in R/M HNSCC and one in LAHNSCC. In patients with R/M HNSCC, anti-PD-1 agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab demonstrated improved survival benefits in the second-line treatment setting compared to the standard of care (standard single-agent systemic therapy). While the net gain in overall survival (OS) with nivolumab was 2.4 mo [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.69, P = 0.01], that with pembrolizumab was 1.5 mo (HR = 0.80 nominal P = 0.0161). The anti-PD-L1 agent durvalumab with or without the anti-cytotoxic T- lymphocyte associated protein-4 agent tremelimumab did not result in any beneficial outcomes. In the first-line setting, in R/M HNSCC, pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy resulted in significant improvement in survival with a net gain in OS of 2.3 mo (HR = 0.77, P = 0.0034) in the overall population and a net gain in OS of 4.2 mo in the PD-L1 positive (combined positive score > 20) population compared to standard of care (EXTREME regime). In patients with PD-L1 positive R/M HNSCC, monotherapy with pembrolizumab also demonstrated statistically significant improvement in survival compared to EXTREME. In LAHNSCC, immunotherapy using avelumab (an anti-PD-L1 agent) along with standard chemoradiation therapy did not result in improved outcomes compared to placebo plus chemoradiation therapy.CONCLUSIONAnti-PD-1 agents provide survival benefits in R/M HNSCC in the first and second-line settings, with acceptable toxicity profiles compared to standard therapy. There is no proven efficacy in the curative setting to date.     

Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab versus Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment of PD-L1–positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy in the United States

IntroductionPembrolizumab has been approved in the United States (US) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, who are ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and with tumors expressing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (Combined Positive Score ≥ 10), or ineligible for any platinum-containing chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status. Long-term KEYNOTE-052 data continue to demonstrate pembrolizumab’s meaningful, durable, and well-tolerated antitumor activity. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus carboplatin plus gemcitabine as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients who have PD-L1–positive tumors from a US third-party healthcare payer’s perspective.Patients and MethodsA partitioned survival model containing 3 health states (progression-free, progressed, and death) was developed. A simulated treatment comparison and a network meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the comparative efficacy of pembrolizumab versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Overall survival, progression-free survival, time on treatment, adverse events, and utilities were modeled using the final analyses of the KEYNOTE-052 trial and 4 studies for carboplatin plus gemcitabine. Cost data were estimated using US standard sources and real-world data. Deterministic, probabilistic, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results.ResultsOver 20 years, pembrolizumab resulted in a mean gain of 2.58 life-years, 2.01 quality-adjusted life-years, and additional costs of $158,561, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $78,925/quality-adjusted life-year compared with carboplatin plus gemcitabine.ConclusionThis study suggests that pembrolizumab is cost-effective compared with carboplatin plus gemcitabine as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are PD-L1–positive.     

Immunotherapy revolutionises non-small-cell lung cancer therapy: Results,perspectives and new challenges

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are antibodies that target key signalling pathways such as programmed death 1 (PD1)/programmed death-ligands 1 and 2 (PDL1 and PDL2) to improve anti-tumour immune responses. Until recently, nivolumab was the only ICI validated for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a second-line treatment setting. Results from recent phase II and phase III randomised trials testing other ICIs have been presented. In Keynote-024, pembrolizumab, an anti-PD1 antibody, was reported to have great efficacy in the first-line treatment of PDL1 ≥ 50% tumours (30% of screened tumours), with a progression-free survival (PFS, median) of 10.4 months versus 6.0 months with chemotherapy (CT; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.50; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.37–0.68, P < 0.001), overall response rate (ORR) of 45% versus 28% with CT (P = 0.0011), and a 1-year overall survival (OS) of around 70%. In contrast, Checkmate-026 reported that nivolumab failed to show any benefit compared with standard platinum-based CT, with a PFS (median) in the PDL1 ≥ 5% NSCLC group of 4.2 months (nivolumab) versus 5.9 months (CT; HR = 1.15: 95% CI 0.91–1.45, P = 0.25). No benefit was observed in the PDL1 ≥ 50% subgroup. An encouraging report of the efficacy of pembrolizumab in addition to CT in first-line treatment in unselected NSCLC was also presented (Keynote-021) with an ORR of 55% versus 29% with CT alone (P = 0.0016). Atezolizumab, an anti-PDL1 antibody, showed efficacy for second-line treatment compared with docetaxel (OAK phase III study) with an OS (median) of 13.8 months versus 9.6 months with docetaxel. These results suggest a new paradigm for the treatment of advanced NSCLC using pembrolizumab for the first-line treatment of PDL1 ≥ 50% tumours.     

Long-term Outcomes with Nivolumab as First-line Treatment in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CheckMate 141

In the randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 141 trial, nivolumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus investigator’s choice (IC) of chemotherapy at primary analysis among 361 patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) post-platinum therapy. Nivolumab versus IC as first-line treatment also improved OS among patients with R/M SCCHN who progressed on platinum therapy for locally advanced disease in the adjuvant or primary setting at 1-year follow-up. In the present long-term follow-up analysis of patients receiving first-line treatment, OS benefit with nivolumab (n = 50) versus IC (n = 26) was maintained (median: 7.7 months versus 3.3 months; hazard ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.94) at 2 years. No new safety signals were identified. In summary, this long-term 2-year analysis of CheckMate 141 supports the use of nivolumab as a first-line treatment for patients with platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN.     

Clinical outcomes and influencing factors of PD-1/PD-L1 in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has an increasing incidence worldwide, and the global 5-year survival rate ranges from 5–30%. In China, HCC seriously threatens the nation''s health; the incidence of HCC ranks fourth among all theriomas, and the mortality rate is the third highest worldwide. The main therapies for HCC are surgical treatment or liver transplantation; however, most patients with HCC will experience postoperative recurrence or metastasis, eventually resulting in mortality. As for advanced or unresectable HCC, the current appropriate treatment strategy is transarterial chemoembolization; however, limited therapeutic effect and natural or acquired drug resistance affect the efficacy of this approach. Previous studies have demonstrated that PD-L1 expression on host cells and myeloid cells plays an important role in PD-L1 blocked-mediated tumor regression. Thus, further research on programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is required. Countries including the United States, France, Britain and China have developed PD-1/PD-L1 blockers, including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, toripalimab, sintilimab and camrelizumab. Notably, all of these blockers have therapeutic effect and influencing factors in HCC. Factors that influence the clinical outcome of PD-1 have also been discovered, such as inflammatory genes, specific receptors and signaling pathways. The discovery of these factors will help to identify novel methods, such as combination treatment, to decrease the influence of other factors on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1. Sorafenib and lenvatinib have been approved for first-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. When first-line treatment frequently fails, pembrolizumab and ipilimumab plus nivolumab are used following sorafenib (but not lenvatinib) treatment in advanced HCC. Thus, tumor immunotherapy using PD-1/PD-L1 blockers exhibits promising outcomes for the treatment of HCC, and more novel PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are being developed to fight against this disease. The present review discusses the clinical results and influencing factors of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in HCC to provide insight into the development and optimization of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of HCC.     

Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in non–small cell lung cancer

The last decade has witnessed rapid advances in the discovery and development of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer medicine, particularly drugs targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The proven antitumor efficacy coupled with low rates of drug-related toxicities observed, albeit idiosyncratic, with these novel immunotherapeutics have led to the registration of multiple PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab, in second-line advanced NSCLC, whereas durvalumab and avelumab are in late-phase clinical testing. Moreover, pembrolizumab has shown a survival advantage in the first-line setting; however, nivolumab failed to show a survival benefit possibly relating to patient selection based on PD-L1 expression. Current patient selection is based on PD-L1 expression, using the relevant companion diagnostic test, where patients with strong PD-L1 expression being more likely to respond to these novel agents. Ongoing clinical research focuses on the development of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy in neoadjuvant and adjuvant NSCLC. There is also much interest in using these drugs as a therapeutic backbone for rational combinations with other treatment modalities including cytotoxic chemotherapies in the first-line NSCLC, other immunotherapies such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 antagonists, molecularly targeted agents including EGFR and ALK inhibitors, and radiotherapy. Concurrent treatment with radiotherapy is of particular interest owing to the potential for the abscopal effect, using radiotherapy to facilitate systemic treatment.     

Biomarkers for immunotherapy response in head and neck cancer

Preclinical data suggest that head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a profoundly immunosuppressive disease, characterized by abnormal secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and dysfunction of immune effector cells. Based on landmark phase III trials, two anti-Programmed Cell Death-1 (PD-1) antibodies, pembrolizumab and nivolumab have been approved for HNSCC by FDA and EMEA in the recurrent/metastatic setting; in addition, pembrolizumab has recently received FDA and EMEA approval as first line treatment. In clinical practice, only a minority of patients with HNSCC derive benefit from immunotherapy and the need for the discovery of novel biomarkers to optimize treatment strategies is becoming increasingly more relevant. Although currently only PD-L1 is widely used as a predictive biomarker for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in HNSCC, there are many ongoing trials focusing on the identification of new biomarkers. This review will summarize current data on emerging biomarkers for response to immunotherapy in HNSCC.     

How to make the best use of immunotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Antibodies that target programmed death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand [programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)] have become a mainstay of first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable genetic alterations. In this review, we summarize results from recent clinical trials that have evaluated the anti-PD-1 antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab and the anti-PD-L1 antibodies atezolizumab and durvalumab as first-line treatment as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, other immunotherapies, and antiangiogenesis agents. We discuss factors that may influence treatment selection, including patient baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, tumor histology, and biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden. While immunotherapy has become a central component of first-line treatment of most patients with advanced NSCLC, important questions remain about how treatment should be managed for individual patients.     

The evolving landscape of immunotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: A focus on predictive biomarkers

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) was defined as a “recalcitrant cancer” because of its dismal prognosis and lack of outcome improvements in the last 30 years. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors revolutionized treatment in many cancer types and results from the IMpower133 study, a double-blind placebo-controlled phase III trial, showed overall survival benefit for atezolizumab when added to standard platinum-etoposide chemotherapy in first-line SCLC setting for the first time since years. Trials with other checkpoint inhibitors, e.g. pembrolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab and ipilimumab, are ongoing in various settings, but, to date, there are no defined factors to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from such treatments. This review summarizes results of immunotherapy trials in SCLC for first-line, maintenance and further-line therapies for single-agents and combinations with checkpoint inhibitors. Predictive factors from these trials are reviewed in order to identify their clinical value, with particular emphasis on PD-L1 expression on both tumor cells and in stroma, especially in pembrolizumab-treated patients, and tumor mutational burden, for patients treated with the ipilimumab and nivolumab combination.     

Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Immunotherapy Combinations for Advanced NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

IntroductionA series of randomized controlled trials have investigated different first-line immunotherapy combinations, but the optimal combination strategy is yet to be established.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis by retrieving relevant literature from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conferences. We included published and gray sources of randomized clinical trials comparing immunotherapy combinations with other treatments as first-line treatments for patients with advanced NSCLC. This study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020210501) to ensure transparency.ResultsWe analyzed a total of 16 studies involving 8278 patients and including 10 immunotherapy combinations. For patients without programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) selection, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was found to be comparable with sintilimab plus chemotherapy in providing the best overall survival (OS) benefit (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72–1.29). Furthermore, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy seemed to provide the best progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.36–0.55) and the best objective response rate (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.12–0.42). Subgroup analysis by PD-L1 suggested that nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus chemotherapy was associated with the best OS in patients with PD-L1 less than 1% and that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was associated with the best OS in patients with PD-L1 greater than or equal to 1%. Pembrolizumab and sintilimab were associated with relatively fewer grade greater than or equal to 3 adverse events when compared with other immunotherapies combined with chemotherapy.ConclusionsOur results suggest that antiprogrammed death-1 combinations are associated with potentially higher survival outcomes than anti–PD-L1 combinations with comparable safety profiles. Moreover, pem-chemo and nivo-ipi-chemo seem to be superior first-line immunotherapy combinations for patients with advanced NSCLC with positive and negative PD-L1 expression, respectively. Although atezo-beva-chemo treatment provided the best progression-free survival and objective response rate, the addition of chemotherapy to immunotherapy would increase the toxicity, especially when antiangiogenesis drugs are simultaneously added.     

A Randomized,Placebo-Controlled Trial of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Squamous NSCLC: Protocol-Specified Final Analysis of KEYNOTE-407

IntroductionIn the randomized KEYNOTE-407 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02775435), pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel (chemotherapy) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated metastatic squamous NSCLC. We report updated efficacy outcomes from the protocol-specified final analysis and, for the first time, progression on next line of treatment.MethodsEligible patients were randomized to chemotherapy plus either pembrolizumab (n = 278) or placebo (n = 281). After positive results from the second interim analysis, patients still receiving placebo could cross over to pembrolizumab monotherapy at the time of confirmed progressive disease. The primary end points were OS and PFS. PFS-2 (time from randomization to progression on next-line treatment/death, whichever occurred first) was an exploratory end point.ResultsAfter median (range) follow-up of 14.3 (0.1–31.3) months, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy continued to exhibit a clinically meaningful improvement over placebo plus chemotherapy in OS (median, 17.1 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.4‒19.9] versus 11.6 mo [95% CI: 10.1‒13.7]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI: 0.58‒0.88]) and PFS (median, 8.0 mo [95% CI: 6.3‒8.4] versus 5.1 mo [95% CI: 4.3‒6.0]; HR, 0.57 [95% CI: 0.47‒0.69]). PFS-2 was longer for patients randomized to first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (HR, 0.59 [95% CI: 0.49‒0.72]). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events occurred in 74.1% and 69.6% of patients receiving pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and placebo plus chemotherapy, respectively.ConclusionsPembrolizumab plus chemotherapy continued to exhibit substantially improved OS and PFS in patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC. The PFS-2 outcomes support pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as a standard first-line treatment in patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC.     

Association of PD-L1 expression status with the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and overall survival in solid tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Whether PD-L1-positive patients derive more overall survival benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced solid tumours is unclear. We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane library and EMBASE databases from January 1, 1966 to March 1, 2019, to identify randomised controlled trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab and avelumab) that had available hazard ratios (HRs) for death according to PD-L1 status. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled overall survival (OS) HR and 95% CI among PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative patients. An interaction test was performed to evaluate the heterogeneity between the two estimates. A total of 24 randomised trials, involving 12,966 participants, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. An OS benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was found in both PD-L1-positive patients (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.60–0.70) and PD-L1-negative patients (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74–0.91) even at the minimum cut-off value of 1%. Significant differences in the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative patients were noted at different cut-off values. Moreover, there was a positive dose–response relationship between PD-L1 positivity and OS benefit (HR for 1%, 0.58, [0.50, 0.67]; 5%, 0.52 [0.43, 0.64]; 10%, 0.50 [0.40, 0.63]). Subgroup analyses showed that these results were generally consistent, regardless of study design, line of treatment, treatment type, tumour type, PD-L1 staining cell type and median follow-up time. We demonstrated that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improved OS in both PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative patients compared to controls, but the magnitude of benefit was clinically PD-L1-dependent.     

A Multicenter,Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Platinum Combination Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab With Platinum Combination Chemotherapy Plus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Treatment-Naive Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Gene Alterations: JCOG2007 (NIPPON Study)

BackgroundFirst-line treatment of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a paradigm shift to platinum combination chemotherapy together with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, regardless of the expression level of the programmed cell death–1 (PD-1) ligand PD-L1 on tumor cells. Moreover, such chemotherapy plus nivolumab (antibody to PD-1) and ipilimumab (antibody to cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein–4) prolonged survival in advanced NSCLC patients compared with chemotherapy alone. We have now designed a randomized, controlled phase III trial (NIPPON, JCOG2007) to confirm that platinum combination chemotherapy plus nivolumab and ipilimumab is superior to such chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab (antibody to PD-1) for treatment-naive patients with advanced NSCLC.Patients and MethodsChemotherapy-naïve patients aged 20 years or older with a performance status of 0 or 1 are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive platinum combination chemotherapy and either pembrolizumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Patients with known genetic driver alterations such as those affecting EGFR or ALK are excluded. Enrollment of 422 patients over 3 years at 55 oncology facilities throughout Japan is planned. The primary endpoint is overall survival. In addition, as ancillary research, metagenomic analysis of the gut microbiota will be performed with fecal samples collected before treatment onset, and the results will be examined for their association to therapeutic effect and adverse events.ConclusionIf the primary endpoint is met, platinum combination chemotherapy together with nivolumab plus ipilimumab will be established as a new, more effective standard treatment for advanced NSCLC.